Paul Murphy
Dublin South-West · People Before Profit-Solidarity · Ireland
“The Minister of State assured us we are bound by international law but then went on to talk about the fact that he wants to deploy troops outside the framework of international law. That is why the Government is getting rid of the triple lock. All the triple lock does is ensure that we only can send troops in line with international law.”
“The case for MetroLink south west is extremely strong. There are 350,000 people living between the Luas red and green lines. That is who will be served by this.”
“Hopefully the junior Minister will be able to clarify. The Minister, Deputy McEntee, said earlier to Deputy Ó Laoghaire, "The people I speak to do not like the fact that Russia has essentially removed, or will remove in the coming months, all our peacekeeping troops from UNIFIL".”
“I, too, want to ask about the senior Minister. This came up at the Dáil reform committee last week. It is very peculiar that a senior Minister is here and has answered previous questions on the triple lock today and then – no offence meant - we have the junior Minister answering these questions, which precisely prevents the continuation o…”
“Its defence is that we should not worry because the Government is only going to send them as part of an international force. I do not think anyone here thinks the Government is going to invade a country all by itself.”
“It is there in black and white in the programme for Government and the Government needs to live up to its commitment to do a new, properly independent feasibility study. I appeal to the Minister of State to ask the Minister for Transport to meet with the metro south west group which has been doing such excellent campaigning on this issue.”
The complete record
Every one of 1,527 lines we hold for Paul Murphy, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 14 of 31.
“Is the Taoiseach at all concerned that it appears the public paid a €10 million sweetener to the World Bank to ease the way for Paschal Donohoe to get his high paying €600,000-a-year top job there? Was the Taoiseach made aware at any stage in the discussions that the World Bank was asking for €131 million? The Department officials were advising not to give any more than that anyway yet Paschal Donohoe decided that we would give an extra €10 million to make €141 million. Was there any sense at that stage that this position would be emerging as his predecessor would be retiring as he was due to retire? Is the Taoiseach concerned? Has he asked questions of his colleague about this?”
“The US MAGA movement just kidnapped a head of state in Venezuela and brought him to America, killing many Venezuelans and Cubans on the way. Does the Taoiseach think that by being craven and just licking the boots of Donald Trump, he will not interfere in our politics or will he change course and call out what is happening on the international stage?”
“Last weekend, the US ambassador attended a far-right conference in Meath. It was a who's who of the Irish far right - Malachy Steenson, Sharon Keogan, multi-billionaire businessman Declan Ganley, an array of transphobes and anti-choicers. The conference explicitly encouraged American interference by the American far-right in Irish politics. Presumably, the US ambassador was nodding along when the conference chair, Eddie Hobbs, told the audience to reach across the Atlantic and seek help from the US MAGA movement to change the Irish Government. This comes after Steve Bannon telling Politico that he is working on developing an Irish Donald Trump and developing an Irish national party. Is the Taoiseach concerned?”
“We need to urgently debate the threat that Donald Trump and US imperialism pose to the entire world. The Taoiseach was at pains to downplay it earlier. We have seen nothing but a boot-licking craven response by the Irish establishment. At the start of this year, the US bombed Venezuela. It killed multiple Venezuelans as well as Cubans and kidnapped Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores.”
“The truth is we are going to have the highest inflation rates in two years. They are not back to the extremely high rates we saw before that, but they are high. The whole premise upon which the Government justified not continuing with the cost-of-living payments was that inflation had returned to normal rates. There was a logic set out that has been confounded by reality, yet the Government is sticking with its position of no return of one-off payments. The Minister knows that the impact of the withdrawal of one-off payments was very hard for the poorer sections of society. As a result of getting rid of the one-off payments, the bottom 10% lost 4.4% of their income. The next 10% lost 3.9%, so there were huge cuts in income and then particularly cruel, savage cuts reserved for disabled people of about €1,400 per year.”
“The Tánaiste's predecessor, Paschal Donohoe, said that there was no need for cost-of-living payments in the budget because “inflation has now returned to normal rates”. He said that inflation would be around 2% this year. That is clearly not the case. We have over 4% food price inflation and 3.3% energy price inflation. It is going to be a cold hard Christmas for many people. At this very late stage, I am asking the Tánaiste to bring forward emergency cost-of-living payments.”
“They include an end to the censorship of their communications, their right to a fair trial and the granting of immediate bail. There appears to be a conspiracy of silence on this matter in the British media. I appeal to the Tánaiste to contact his British counterpart to express our concern about what is happening and to demand that basic civil liberties are upheld.”
“By the time we come back in January, unless there is a change of approach by the British State, hunger strikers will again have died in British prisons. They will have been killed by an injustice system that arms, supports and funds genocide. Eight young people are currently on hunger strike in Britain. They are people who have been held without trial or bail for more than a year for protesting against British support for genocide. Qesser Zuhrah is on day 47 of her hunger strike. In 1981, Martin Hurson died after 46 days, another victim of the British injustice system. Yesterday, she was hospitalised only after significant protests by Zarah Sultana and others demanding that the prison allow in an ambulance. Their demands are extremely reasonable.”
“In South Dublin County Council's area, the CRU has made a decision to grant permission for Gas Networks Ireland to connect a gas pipeline to the massive Vantage data centre in Profile Park. That decision states that the emissions will result in 3 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent. Some 32% of the emissions in that area already come from data centres. Emissions are going to go up even further.”
“That is my question. The Minister of State is in the Department of the environment. He cannot just say something and then move on. It is completely illogical to say, on the one hand, that we are committed to this legally binding target of reducing energy consumption but, on the other, that we agree with a decision paper which states that our level of electricity usage will continue to grow and that this is going to be driven by the data centres. You have to pick one or the other. We will either reduce energy consumption or we are going to allow it to increase. Increasing energy consumption is going to lead to a significant increase in greenhouse gas emissions. The latter is because data centres are now directly connected to fossil fuel usage. Originally, it used to be the case that we should not worry and that it would all be renewables.”
“It has been stated that Ireland's total electricity demand has grown by 30% over the past ten years, with the demand from data centres having greatly contributed to this level of growth. This level of growth is projected to continue over the next ten years, with data centres representing a larger share of total energy demand. How does that tally with a commitment and a legal obligation to reduce energy demand when it is being state that this is going to continue to go up fast and that data centres are a driving factor.”
“Will the Minister of State expand on how it is possible to have a policy of exponential growth of data centres that are using fossil fuels? How does that coincide with what he says to the effect that this has to exist within the bounds of our climate targets. We are signed up to the EED, which has a legally binding target to reduce energy consumption by 11.7% by 2030. Ireland's target reduction is 16%. Yet, we have a decision paper from the CRU which states that medium-term electricity demand from data centres could reach 5.8 GW. That is equal to the peak energy demand for the entire country. It is also more than the entire 5 GW target for offshore wind energy by 2030, which the Government is sure to meet.”
“It seems we would be losing out on our country becoming a toxic waste ground. The new CRU large user policy enables further exponential expansion of data centres. It allows them to generate their own electricity using fossil fuels. The CRU is also allowing data centres to connect directly to the gas network in South Dublin County Council's area. How can the Government possibly say any of this is in line with our legal obligations to reduce both final energy consumption and carbon emissions?”
“As the gap between the votes is less than ten, given the importance of this matter, that this is about women's health and is about simply restoring a Bill to the Order Paper that already had passed Second Stage in the last Dáil, I am asking that we vote by means other than electronically. I ask people to look at their consciences and even shift from a "No".”
“Surely some of them will break with the party Whip and vote with the people, who, urban or rural, are overwhelmingly opposed to fox hunting.”
“I have to put it to those in Sinn Féin. What are they thinking? What are they thinking about supporting this colonial practice? If they do not come to their senses, if they do not change their party's position on this, I hope at the very least that they will allow a free vote. Surely they know that this is going to be done away with. In 20 years’ time, we are not going to have the continuation of fox hunting in this country. Surely a majority of the Sinn Féin membership supports a ban on fox hunting. I know that those I worked with in the presidential campaign were laughing at Heather Humphreys, her support of rural pursuits and her defence of fox hunting, and they were supporting Catherine Connolly’s opposition to it.”
“Saoirse McHugh makes a very good point in the newspaper today: “I don't think anybody believes that getting a pack of 50 dogs and 50 people on horseback to chase a single fox to exhaustion is a reasonable or efficient form of pest control.” Foxes are no threat to anyone or anyone's livelihood. They are beautiful, intelligent animals that play a vital role in our ecosystem. Tearing them limb from limb is not a sport. It is not an ancient Irish tradition. It is not a rural pursuit. It is an alien bloodlust, imported into this country by a colonial aristocracy. The Irish Masters of Foxhounds Association was established in 1845 during the Famine, as Deputy Healy noted. While ordinary people were starving to death, there were aristocrats in red coats riding around on horseback, torturing animals to death. That is what this tradition is about.”
“If the Minister had a problem, he could come back and sum up by saying, “We agree with a ban on fox hunting, but we have a problem with some of the wording and the way it is done”. That is no problem. What would happen is it would be passed on Second Stage and amended on Committee Stage. The point on the ban on trail hunting is there precisely because this has been used in Britain as a way of continuing undercover or underground fox hunting. However, no ban is specified and we support the possibility of the continuation of drag hunting. Let us be real about the argument on pest control.”
“In the end, the anti-fox hunting candidate won and the pro-fox hunting candidate lost, and it was a strong illustration for people that this person was wildly out of touch. Therefore, it is deeply ironic that we are going to have a vote tonight in the Dáil, where it seems the three big parties are going to continue to be out of touch, not take the lesson of that presidential election and vote to allow this cruel practice to continue. Regarding the other arguments the Minister made, the only way he can defend the indefensible is with misinformation and a divisive approach. There was the suggestion that this is about pest control. First, to be clear, it is misinformation to say that our Bill bans the shooting of foxes. Of course, it does not.”
“We are opposed to this cruel, barbaric practice. We think it must go the way of dog fighting. I do not know if the Minister had a problem with the banning of dog fighting. We are opposed to badger baiting. It should be banned immediately. Others do not agree with that. The Minister thinks that this should continue. That is a binary issue. I am sorry if that offends the Minister in some way. The Minister did not say "rural pursuits" and instead went for "rural activities" because, of course, it brings us back to the presidential election. Fox hunting played an unexpectedly outsized role in the campaign as an illustration of how incredibly out of touch Heather Humphreys was, with her continued invocation of rural pursuits and her enthusiastic support for fox hunting, not shared by the vast majority of the public.”
“The Minister is defending the indefensible and he knows it. He is defending cruel, barbaric practices. He is defending the organised killing for human entertainment of a tiny minority of foxes. Then, he tries to do it in such a way as to suggest that it should not be divided along urban and rural lines, having two minutes previously said that this is a "wedge issue" that is "designed to be emotive and confrontational", and that there are many other rural activities we would like to ban. On the one hand, the Minister said we should not be pitching it as urban and rural, and we agree, but on the other hand, he was doing precisely that. The Minister said we are presenting this as a binary issue. He was not clear on what non-binary way he wants to present it. Some of us are opposed to fox hunting.”
“I move: That Dáil Éireann adopts the Report of the Committee on Standing Orders and Dáil Reform entitled, "Rota for Leaders' Questions pursuant to Standing Order 38", copies of which were laid before Dáil Éireann on 12th December, 2025.”
“I move: That, pursuant to Standing Order 205, the Health (Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy) (Amendment) Bill 2023, which lapsed on the dissolution of the 33rd Dáil, shall be restored at Order for Committee Stage and notice shall be published pursuant to Standing Order 37.”
“I understand that survivors have been attempting to engage with, and discuss this with, the Minister for children but there has been no engagement whatsoever. In replies to parliamentary questions, the Minister details engagement with boards, with audits and with governance structures but does not seem to be engaging with the survivors. I ask the Taoiseach to discuss this with the Minister to ensure she engages and meets with the survivors.”
“It has been three years since the completion of the Shannon report into sexual abuse of children at St. John Ambulance. It is a harrowing report which concluded that the organisation had failed to act against the perpetrator for years, despite, "a significant degree of organisational awareness of the risk that he posed to children". One of the central recommendations of that report was that the national safeguarding officer be independent, specifically to counter what was described as a cultural deference within St. John Ambulance. However, departmental funding for that role has now been ended and the same officer is being retained directly by the organisation itself, which at the very least raises a question mark over the independence of the role.”
“The point is to stop social media companies pushing toxic material at us as standard, to stop them normalising racism, sexism and transphobia, and to stop Elon Musk exploiting his ownership and control of social media to flood the zone, whip up fear and hatred, manipulate politics and push it to the far right around the world. That is why we will be introducing a Bill next week on First Stage to turn off recommender algorithms by default and to ban them entirely for children. To make a real difference, we need to take on the big tech companies.”
“Turning off the algorithm would mean teenage boys would no longer have misogynistic manosphere content being pushed at them the minute they go online, which is what happens - a teenage boy buys a new blank mobile phone, sets up a teenage boy's account and within half an hour is flooded with this crap. Teenage girls could use social media to communicate with their friends without being inundated with viral videos promoting eating disorders, suicide and self-harm. Women could go online without being bombarded with upsetting videos about miscarriages and stillbirths as soon as the algorithm realises that they are pregnant. The point is not to censor this material; people can still look it up if they want to.”
“We had that confirmed at the AI committee just a couple of weeks ago. Turning off recommender algorithms by default and turning them off entirely when the user is under 18 would be transformative. At a stroke, it would stop the torrent of toxicity that big tech is flooding us with so that we stay online for longer and buy more stuff. Big tech is exploiting the human instinct to rubberneck even though we do not like what we see, even though it disgusts us. It is why their algorithms recommend execution videos and racist far-right propaganda. Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg turn us all into motorists gawking at car accidents.”
“We all know the harm that can result from online toxic material. We know especially the harm that can be done to children. We have had fine speeches from Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael TDs making that point, but what is the Government going to do about it? The answer so far is nothing. It is a fine issue to make speeches about and to have concerns on, but when it comes to taking action and taking on the big tech companies, the Government has a record of inaction so far. The Government set up Coimisiún na Meán to regulate this. The commission recommended in its draft online safety code that social media companies should turn off recommender algorithms by default. This one simple measure would have a massive impact. What happened to that recommendation? It was removed after lobbying by big tech companies.”
“The new roll-out of BusConnects routes has been a disaster in my constituency. Constituents report that buses on the F spine route, which were supposed to provide a more direct route to the city centre and greater connectivity, are taking 20 to 30 minutes longer to get into town and providing fewer options for people trying to get to work or school. It is made worse by the frequent delays and cancellations seen across nearly all routes in Dublin South-West, including the S and W spines operated by Go-Ahead Ireland. Elsewhere, the NTA has been forced to change routes in Finglas and Chapelizod due to protests and people making their voices heard. Will the NTA do the same here or will people be forced to protest?”
“Their demands are minimal, namely, the right to a fair trial, the right to access bail, the right to access medical care in prison and for the ending of the proscription of Palestine Action. There is an almost total media blackout on this in Britain, leading people to suspect there is a so-called D-notice in relation to this. Is the Taoiseach concerned about the decline of civil liberties and the fact that people are forced to go on hunger strike in Britain?”
“Does the Taoiseach think there is any national security implications for the significant decline in basic civil liberties that is happening in Britain, such as the proscription of organisations of Palestine protestors like Palestine Action, the denial of the right to a jury in the vast majority of trials and what is happening with the Palestine protesters who are charged with nothing more than property damage and who have been held for over a year without trial and without access to bail? The consequence is there are now eight protesters on hunger strike for over 30 days. This is the longest, most significant hunger strike since the H-block hunger strikers.”
“How much additional funding will be allocated to provide special needs services and appropriate school places for all? I want to mention an awful, tragic case I was asked to raise, namely that of a young girl called Jannah, who was 12 at the time she tragically took her own life. She had been waiting for three years and ten weeks, which is about 12 times the legally required period within which her assessment of need should have started. Her mother contacted the authorities seven times to say the case was urgent and that an assessment was needed. The girl did not receive any assessment or any of the services she needed. It is an absolute disgrace.”
“The priority is to splash the cash for the fast-food bosses, big multinationals, builders and developers instead of caring for children with additional needs. The motion contains simple actions that the State could take to end the assessment-of-needs backlog. The Government is not opposing the motion, but is the motion just going to go on a long list of very good motions, including motions we have proposed, suggesting how the Government can deal with this problem, while it does absolutely nothing about it? Will it just join the law in something that the Government ignores? What is the target date to provide all the assessments within six months? Since the Government is not opposing the motion, it should be able to name that date. What is the emergency action plan? What is the longer-term workforce plan?”
“What does it say about our society, Government and State if there is, in the middle of a storm, a 15-year-old girl who is to sleep outside the Dáil for 50 hours? What does it say that she started her sleep-out around the same time as a protest by a large number of disability organisations that were crying out to the Government not to make them poorer, as the Government has just done through the budget, and crying out for a winter emergency payment? It points to the utter failure of the State to vindicate the rights of children with additional needs. The ask is extremely simple and basic: stop breaking your own law, provide the assessments of need and then the therapies. What is happening shows how messed up the priorities of the Government are.”
“They can just sue us in a different country that is also signed up to investor court systems and the Irish courts have no oversight role whatsoever. What a joke. We need to stop this.”
“They can still take court cases under it for another 20 years. Other international treaties and courts have similar clauses. CETA is even worse, because once we ratify it, which we do not have to since trade is currently happening with Canada, we can only leave if the entire EU does. It is an extremely high and undemocratic barrier that gives every other European country a veto over our future. There is no oversight here. The Government is claiming that this legislation complies with the Supreme Court judgment because it found that ratifying these courts would be unconstitutional, but there is no meaningful oversight here. A multinational can choose to sue us in any other country to evade this.”
“What is to stop any multinational for suing us for loss of profits under CETA if we decide to impose windfall taxes or make any changes to corporation tax in the future? The Government is effectively trying to condemn us forever to be its model of a corporate tax haven, a vassal state for US multinationals. The impact of that is not just in the cases themselves. It is not just in the potential billions of euro that the public could be forced to pay to these corporations in unfair, rigged, non-court judicial processes. It is also about the chilling effect. This is putting limits on our democracy into the future. The Energy Charter Treaty, for example, has a 20-year withdrawal clause, so even if we got out of it tomorrow, which we should, we are still stuck with it for another 20 years.”
“The Government is presenting this Bill as only applying to CETA and an EU trade agreement with Chile. It says not to worry because it will only apply to Canadian and Chilean companies, but all a big US multinational has to do to avail of CETA's investor courts is to go through a subsidiary in Canada. If it does not already have a subsidiary in Canada, it can open a subsidiary in Canada and then take a case. Let us say a future left government wants to prioritise renewable energy for people's needs, not AI, so it says we are going to stop having more and more data centres. Passing this Bill can mean that Canada, Google, Amazon or Microsoft can sue us for any future loss of earnings as a result. They can sue us for taking climate action in the interests of people and the planet.”
“This is a recipe for fossil fuel companies in particular to stop states from doing what is necessary to save the planet for all of us for a liveable future. Fossil fuel companies should be paying us billions for wrecking the climate, not us paying them, but instead these twisted courts allow them to demand compensation from us for not being able to cause even more storms, floods and devastating heatwaves around the world. It is outrageous that our Government wants to entangle us further into this warped system by expanding investor courts to more international agreements. We are already in deep enough trouble with the Energy Charter Treaty investor courts without handing more multinationals an even bigger blank cheque, which is what is enabling them to sue us in a variety of other investor courts will do.”
“That is indirect expropriation - the investor had an expectation when it invested because the Government told the investor it would be able to continue to jack up rents as much as it wanted, and now its legitimate expectation of making this profit has been cut across by the Government's action, so the investor will sue. The investor might be investing in liquefied natural gas terminals because the Government has given the go-ahead for that, then when a future government comes to power and says this is of course madness and there is to be no more fossil fuel infrastructure, the investor can now sue the Irish State. It would not be in the Irish courts, which is a crucial point, but in parallel courts accessible only by corporations. It would sue the Irish State there for billions in lost revenue because of indirect expropriation.”
“Basically anything at all is counted as expropriation under CETA and how it is interpreted. I go to annex 8-A, which defines expropriation. It states that if you have direct expropriation, which is the term that we would know it as, there is a slam-dunk case for compensation, but also, "indirect expropriation occurs if a measure or series of measures of a Party [that is, a country] has an effect equivalent to direct expropriation, in that it substantially deprives the investor of the fundamental attributes of property in its investment, including the right to use, enjoy and dispose of its investment, without formal transfer of title or outright seizure." What could that look like? If we introduce rent controls that actually bring rents down, a Canadian investor, under this, can now sue the Irish State.”
“A fossil fuel company, Klesch Group Holdings Limited, is suing the EU, Germany and Denmark for at least €95 million over windfall taxes under the Energy Charter Treaty. In EcoDevelopment v. Tanzania, a Swedish investor sued Tanzania when the land title for a sugar plantation that never got off the ground was cancelled by the government. The company won a payout under this process of more than three times its original investment. The Egyptian Government was sued under an ISDS process because it proposed to increase the minimum wage. The Uruguayan Government was sued by the tobacco industry because it tried to put in better health warnings. This is about giving corporations the power to get massive amounts of money from states and chill progressive legislation into the future.”
“According to the United Nations, ISDS or investor courts have awarded corporations the equivalent of the combined GDP of 45 small and poor countries. The average award is €250 million but awards of €1 billion or multi-billion euro awards are not uncommon. I will give some examples of what the Government is trying to sign us up for. In the Woodhouse Investment case, the UK is facing a claim from a company which invested in a proposed coal mine in Cumbria which was cancelled when the British High Court ruled against it on climate grounds, and it is looking for compensation for that. In 2024, ExxonMobil launched an ISDS case under the Energy Charter Treaty against the Dutch Government as part of a set of arbitration cases demanding billions of euro for its decision to phase out gas exploration in Groningen in the Netherlands.”
“The Minister earlier claimed at length that the investor court system, ICS, is substantially different from the investor state dispute settlement, ISDS. This is simply not true. This is just a rebranding of ISDS as ICS because its brand was so toxic. The Minister of State does not have to take my word for it. Listen to the expert advice of Comhlámh, Christian Aid, ActionAid and Trócaire, which have researched these issues extensively and concluded that the investor court system is a rebranded version of ISDS that offers a few cosmetic changes but which does not different fundamentally from ISDS. They are not making it up. They are able to see through the corporate spin that it suits this Government and the European Commission to inflict on us.”
“Contrary to what the Government is saying now, this could well include Mercosur in the future. The Bill is deliberately drafted in such a way as to ensure the Government will never have to hold a referendum on investor courts ever again. The whole point of this seemingly innocuous technical Bill is to avoid having to consult the people. Why? It is because the Government knows that if it suggested setting up a parallel system whereby corporations could sue states outside the regular judicial process, it would not win a referendum on it. Investor courts are completely against the public interest. They are rigged, private courts, designed to take the side of private investors against elected governments and to put profits before people every single time.”
“It deserves a national debate and national outrage. We should actually be having a referendum on it because the results of this could truly be catastrophic. I have been fighting this for more than a decade. I was in the European Parliament at the beginnings of CETA. I was involved in organising with civil society organisations across Europe, and also ordinary people, trade unions and civil society groups in Canada, warning about what this was, and now the Government is attempting to push this through. This paves the way not only for investor courts, or the parallel justice system for corporations only, as part of CETA but also for private investor courts as part of every current and future trade agreement that the Government will sign us up to in respect of which it seeks such courts.”
“This is dystopian stuff. Under an innocuous title, the Arbitration (Amendment) Bill, what is being proposed is a fundamental challenge to democracy, sovereignty and people’s environmental and labour standards. What the Government is proposing to do, in darkness, is to sign Ireland up to a parallel justice system. This is not a justice system that the Minister of State and I can access; it is a justice system only for corporations. That is what is proposed and that is what CETA is about, or at least that is what the investor court system – the renamed investor-state dispute settlement mechanism – is about. It is a parallel justice system accessible only by corporations for corporations to sue states if they intervene and interfere with their legitimate expectation of making profits. That is what this is about.”
“Their committee has two simple asks, namely, pay parity with community training centres, CTCs, and the implementation of pay scales. I am aware that there are discussions ongoing with a small offer being made but there is still no promise of a pay scale like other, similar workers. Can the Government commit to these asks?”
“There are many people doing important work in adult education across this country. One mechanism for that is so-called local training initiatives, LTIs. There are 100 workers spread out throughout 16 ETBs. Scandalously, these workers for LTIs have not had an increase in their pay in 20 years despite the deepening cost-of-living crisis. In 2001, the Labour Court recognised pay inequities within the community training programme and recommended a 20% pay increase, as well as future increases, but they were not extended to those working for LTIs. Community training staff who are funded in the same way as LTIs, follow identical guidelines and work with the same students received those pay increases and salary scales but the LTI workers did not.”