Alex Yam
Singapore
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I know the Minister of State indicated that while it is still undergoing investigation, we should not speculate. I know also from her reply that they have removed the wrong classification of our trade deficit with the US.”
“Thank you, Speaker. Building on the point that the Minister-in-charge of energy had raised earlier about fixed rates. There is concern amongst consumers that the gencos and the electricity suppliers may, at some point, invoke a force majeure, and that would affect the supply contracts that are signed with consumers.”
“Chairman, therefore, I look forward to hearing how MCCY intends to further embed the ethos of "we first" across multiple aspects of society so that our national identity is formed through participation, not just persuasion.”
“Thank you, Chairman, 41 questions and 330 minutes later, I certainly think the Ministry deserves the $100 back. So, I seek leave to withdraw my amendment. [(proc text) Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. (proc text)] [(proc text) The sum of $2,407,711,100 for Head X ordered to stand part of the Main Estimates.”
“Thank you, Chairman. The Minister updated the House earlier about the importance of keeping pace with technological advancements as well as hybrid threats, especially in the cyber domain.”
“If we are intentional in leveraging the reach and influence of institutions like SAFRA, we can ensure that Total Defence can remain a lived national commitment and not confined to the uniformed services or to our schools.”
The complete record
Every one of 592 lines we hold for Alex Yam, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 1 of 12.
“Thank you, Speaker. Building on the point that the Minister-in-charge of energy had raised earlier about fixed rates. There is concern amongst consumers that the gencos and the electricity suppliers may, at some point, invoke a force majeure, and that would affect the supply contracts that are signed with consumers. Therefore, I seek clarification, what safeguards there are in place to protect consumers and businesses from disruptions and the dramatic price spikes, and how will the Government ensure continuity of supply and fair contractual outcomes for consumers as well as the gencos?”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I know the Minister of State indicated that while it is still undergoing investigation, we should not speculate. I know also from her reply that they have removed the wrong classification of our trade deficit with the US. Having done so, has the trade team on the US side provided any indications to MTI on the reasons for our inclusion? The second question is, moving beyond the particular issue of Section 301, beyond our existing agreements with actors like the US, are there plans for MTI to also accelerate diversification into emerging markets or strengthening our regional supply chain so that we reduce our exposure to unilateral trade actions such as this? My last supplementary question is, given Singapore's inclusion despite the trade deficit, does the Ministry assess that the traditional indicators of trade imbalance are no longer the primary basis for such investigations? And what precedent does this set for future act actions against economies, such as ours, which are small and open?”
“Thank you, Chairman, 41 questions and 330 minutes later, I certainly think the Ministry deserves the $100 back. So, I seek leave to withdraw my amendment. [(proc text) Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. (proc text)] [(proc text) The sum of $2,407,711,100 for Head X ordered to stand part of the Main Estimates. (proc text)] [(proc text) The sum of $677,912,500 for Head X ordered to stand part of the Development Estimates. (proc text)]”
“Thank you, Chairman. For the Minister, on the consolidation under SpexSG, I might have missed it but could the Minister share the expected timeline for the new structure to be fully operational so that we can quickly address the myriad of needs that our Team Singapore athletes have on their life journey. The second question is for Minister of State Dinesh. He earlier spoke about the importance of unity and togetherness. We see a lot of collaboration at the apex leadership level for our ethnic and religious communities. But does the Ministry have an assessment of how much of this permeates down to the level of congregants and community members. What more can we do in this area? Lastly, for Senior Parliamentary Secretary Goh, she mentioned the youth panels and the partnering with Government agencies to allow youths to shape policy. Could she elaborate on how the Ministry will be ensuring that these ideas from the panels are meaningfully introduced and go towards influencing policy outcomes? One last one. Overarching all of that, a lot of announcements today, a lot of emphasis on building a "we first" society, but could I also ask the Ministry how would we measure success beyond participation in all that we have announced? How do we assess that social trust has been enhanced?”
“Chairman, in a "we first" society, our youth are not just beneficiaries of Singapore's future. They must also be partners in shaping it. Over the past year, MCCY has engaged many young Singaporeans. These conversations are valuable ones. But the key question is how these conversations translate into sustained pathways for participation. Young Singaporeans today grow up in a very different environment. They face economic uncertainties, rapid technological change and the constant pressures of the digital world. Member Dr Charlene Chen just spoke about loneliness in our interconnected world today. Therefore, how is MCCY equipping our young people with the resilience to navigate these pressures while remaining grounded in a sense of shared responsibility for Singapore? What opportunities are there for young Singaporeans to step forward meaningfully in community building, policymaking and service to society? For example, how can our youths be more actively involved in shaping local initiatives, volunteering networks or national conversations? For example, in Finland, under the Finland Youth Act, municipalities are required to include youths through the youth councils or nuorisovaltuusto and there are over 300 youth councils to cultivate early civic ownership. Ultimately, the goal is not simply to encourage participation, but to cultivate partnership but to nurture a generation that sees Singapore not just a place to live but as a community they feel responsible for, because when they feel a genuine stake in Singapore, they and we collectively, can unlock the fecundity of their ideas, the initiative and civic imagination. I would appreciate therefore the Minister's thoughts on how we can continue building such a generation.”
“I would therefore appreciate the Minister's update on how this new structure is taking shape. Strengthening Support for National Sports Associations”
“Chairman, at last year's COS, the Ministry announced an important restructuring of our high-performance sports ecosystem. This included the consolidation of the National Youth Sports Institute and the Singapore Sports Institute and the Singapore Sports School into the High Performance Sports Institute (HPSI). The Ministry also alluded to the eventual consolidation of the HPSI and the Singapore Sports School. This is a significant structural shift. For many years, Singapore's sports landscape has involved multiple institutions working across different stages of the athlete's journey, from youth identification to elite performance. The intent behind this consolidation is therefore an important one: to create a more integrated system that supports athletes more effectively throughout their development. Could the Minister provide an update on the progress of this consolidation? In particular, how will the new structure strengthen athlete development pathways, ensure smoother transitions from youth potential to elite performance? How will the system better coordinate coaching, sports science and athlete management so that promising young athletes receive consistent support as they progress? At the same time, I seek to ask how the Ministry will ensure that sporting excellence is balanced with education and well-being, because many of our young athletes must juggle training commitments with academic responsibilities? Finally, from the perspective of athletes, coaches and parents, what improvements have been observed so far? How will MCCY and SportSG ensure that this integration reduces fragmentation across agencies and ultimately leads to stronger long-term outcomes for Team Singapore?”
“Chairman, beyond competition and medals, sports build resilience, teamwork, discipline and healthy habits for young people. However, many students today find it difficult to join school co-curricular activities (CCAs) unless they already demonstrate a certain level of aptitude. Trials can be highly competitive and places are of course limited. As a result, some students who simply wish to try something new or participate recreationally find themselves excluded from school sports altogether. This risks narrowing participation to those who are already skilled when the developmental nature of sport lies precisely in allowing more young people to experience it. Could MCCY share how it is working with MOE to broaden access to sports in schools so that participation serves not only competitive excellence but also serves youth development? For example, are there plans to expand recreational tiers, modular programmes or learn-to-play pathways where students can pick up a sport without needing to pass a competitive trial? Such pathways could allow students to discover interest and develop confidence before deciding whether they wish to pursue a sport more seriously. Sports also provide one of the most natural spaces for young Singaporeans of different abilities and backgrounds to interact. When students train and play together, they learn cooperation, perseverance and mutual respect. In building a "we first" society, such shared experiences matter. School sports should remain both a pathway for excellence and a platform for broad participation. I would therefore appreciate if the Minister could share how policy can better balance these objectives while ensuring that student well-being and academic balance are safeguarded. Sports and Outdoors – Shaping Our Youths”
“Chairman, therefore, I look forward to hearing how MCCY intends to further embed the ethos of "we first" across multiple aspects of society so that our national identity is formed through participation, not just persuasion. It will be the quiet but enduring conviction amongst our people that our fate is shared, and that when the world is more turbulent, Singaporeans will instinctively do what we have always done best – to put "we" before "me". Because in this uncertain world, the greatest strength Singapore possesses will not just be our economy or institutions, but our people. [(proc text) Question proposed. (proc text)] 1.00 pm Religious Institutions and Youths”
“Programmes that bring students into contact with different segments of society can deepen empathy and a sense of shared responsibility. In workplaces, many Singaporeans spend a large part of their lives at work. Employers therefore have an opportunity to foster environments where collaboration across backgrounds, nationalities and skills is valued and where corporate volunteering helps employees contribute beyond their professional roles. In our neighbourhoods as well, those are the most immediate setting where "we first" instincts can flourish. Singapore's housing model has long been a quiet but powerful engine of social cohesion. But as lifestyles change, we need to reinforce face-to-face engagements so that neighbours do not become strangers. Initiatives that bring residents together can help restore that sense of familiarity with each other. We must recognise that much of our national conversation takes place online. Digital platforms have extraordinary reach. But they also amplify outrage, misinformation and polarisation. So, for a diverse and multicultural society like ours, cultivating digital citizenship is also essential. Our online spaces must reflect the same values of responsibility and mutual respect as we do in our physical spaces. We must also continue to bridge differences across generations and socioeconomic groups between the old and the young. Creating opportunities for these generations to interact will help anchor our national identity in both memory and renewal. We must guard against social silos forming as economic pressures rise. A "we first" society must ensure that compassion and mutual support remain embedded within our social compact.”
“Surveys by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) consistently show relatively high levels of trust in our public institutions. Community participation and volunteering have grown steadily over the years. But trust is not a static asset. It must be continually renewed. International comparisons are perhaps instructive for us. In many Nordic societies, more than 60% to 70% of citizens say they trust people they do not know personally. These are among the highest levels of social trust anywhere in the world. Such trust did not arise by accident, of course. It is the product of social norms and institutions that encourage citizens to participate actively in community life. Take Denmark, for example. There is a deeply rooted tradition known as "föreningsliv". It refers to a vibrant culture of associations where citizens organise sports clubs, cultural groups and volunteer initiatives. Many of these organisations are run not by professionals but by ordinary citizens. These associations build horizontal bonds across age, profession and background. They create the social networks that sustain trust. In the Netherlands there is the concept of "gezelligheid". This word has no perfect English translation, but it captures a sense of warmth, togetherness and shared belonging. It reflects the idea that communal life matters, that it is not merely a collection of individuals pursuing individual goals. In Japan, the "Yakult Ladies" play a vital social safety-net role, keeping a super-aged society connected. These examples remind us that social cohesion is not automatic. It is cultivated deliberately through everyday practices. So, for us, we must begin with our young. Schools are places where students prepare for life. They are also where civic instincts are formed.”
“Chairman, I move, "That the total sum to be allocated for Head X of the Estimates be reduced by $100." In quieter times, discussions about national identity can feel philosophical, even abstract. But we certainly do not live in quiet times today. The world around us is very much unsettled. War rages again in the Middle East. Major powers are contesting influence across regions and supply chains. Strategic rivalry is intensifying. Closer to home, regional tensions periodically flare as well. For a small and open country like ours, these developments are not distant headlines. They are reminders that the global environment is becoming more fragmented and uncertain. In such a world, national resilience cannot rest only on economic strength or military capability. It must also rest on something less visible but equally vital and that is social trust – the confidence that fellow citizens will stand together when it matters. This is the essence of what we mean when we speak about a "we first" society. But building such a society today is not so straightforward. Singaporeans, understandably, are focused on bread-and-butter issues. Families worry about the cost of living. Parents think about their children's future. Workers are adapting to technological disruption and economic uncertainty. In a fast-paced and demanding society, it is natural for people to focus first on their own households. Yet if everyone looks only inward, the invisible threads that hold a nation together will loosen. A "we first" national identity cannot be built by slogans alone. It cannot rely only on campaigns or occasional events. It must be experienced in daily life and reinforced through habits. Singapore begins from a position of strength.”
“First, I would like to thank the Minister for my five marks. For Minister of State Jasmin on AI, I welcome the framework of the four “Learns”, but if I could seek some clarity. I understand that she had earlier shared that the guidelines have been sent to all schools and for teachers to introduce it. Could the Minister of State share the staging and the levels by which, even if broadly, when students would be encouraged or be introduced to AI? Because beyond the four “Learns”, I think there is, to me, another factor. And that is learning before AI, so that students have a firm basis in knowledge, in mastery of gathering information before AI comes into play. The second related question is that now that we have engaged the teaching community in schools, as well as introducing to students, there is another important group of stakeholders, and that is parents. Because just now we keep mentioning arms race, and I think as parents ourselves, sometimes, it is prone that when we are worried that something new is introduced, we would want to enter an AI tools arms race and end up spurring another round of worry for students' ability to cope as well as a differentiation in between different levels of students – those who have more and those who have less.”
“AI literacy must therefore be embedded systematically and age appropriately across the education journey, with teachers supported through clear guidelines and professional development. But the conversation does not end at graduation. AI Upskilling Access for the Workforce AI is reshaping industries across the board. Continuous learning is becoming essential not only for engineers, programmers, accountants, designers, logistics consultants and frontline supervisors. Yet, mid-career and mature workers may find AI training inaccessible due to cost, time constraints or being unfamiliarity with digital tools. Here, accessibility and relevance are key. Upskilling pathways must be modular and practical, integrated into mainstream continuing education rather than confined to specialist tracks. Training should be directly linked to real workplace tasks. And smaller firms that lack in-house capacity will need further support. Lower-wage workers must not be left behind as automation advances. If digital literacy has become a baseline skill over the past two decades, AI literacy must now become a shared national competency. It should not be a niche advantage enjoyed by a small group, but a common capability that strengthens our collective resilience. Ultimately, AI is a tool. Whether it empowers or diminishes us depends on the norms and structures we build around it. If we are intentional, we can raise a generation that masters AI without being mastered by it and a workforce that uses AI to enhance judgement rather than outsource it. In doing so, we ensure that technology amplifies what is makes us uniquely human. Preparing Graduates for an AI Job Market”
“Thank you, Chairman. AI is shaping the way we learn and the way we work. But it also raises deeper questions about judgement, equity and the preservation of human creativity. Our students are already encountering AI tools in their daily lives. AI literacy must mean more than technical familiarity. It must include the ability to question outputs, detect bias, understand limitations and exercise ethical judgement. A student should know not only how to generate an answer through AI, but how to interrogate it. In practical classroom terms, this may mean requiring students to produce an initial draft before consulting AI and assessing them on how they evaluate and refine AI suggestions. It may mean presenting students with an AI-generated essay and asking them to critique its weaknesses. 7.00 pm In Mathematics and Science, we might place greater weight on explaining reasoning rather than simplify and presenting a solution. In the arts, AI, of course, can generate various variations, but the creative direction must remain firmly in the hands of the student. The principle therefore is simple. AI should be a thinking partner, not an answer engine. It should expand imagination and not standardise it. It should accelerate our ability to iterate but not eliminate intellectual struggle. We must be careful that creativity is not stifled by convenience. The most complex processing tool ever is the human brain. It would be deeply ironic if, in building ever more powerful machines, we allowed our own capacity for deep thinking and problem solving to weaken. Some degree of cognitive effort, even friction, is necessary for growth. If AI removes that effort entirely, the learning becomes hollow. At the same time, we must ensure that there is equitable access.”
“Thank you, Chairman. The Minister updated the House earlier about the importance of keeping pace with technological advancements as well as hybrid threats, especially in the cyber domain. While we have talked a lot about how we grow defence internally and get our people on board, could I ask the Minister if he could share with the House, what is the status of our international cooperation in terms of defence, growing our defence capability and also threat assessments?”
“If we are intentional in leveraging the reach and influence of institutions like SAFRA, we can ensure that Total Defence can remain a lived national commitment and not confined to the uniformed services or to our schools. I would appreciate if the Ministry could share what outcomes MINDEF will track to assess whether defence is truly anchored in the community and what more can be done to strengthen this vital pillar of national resilience. SAFRA and the Community”
“We hear conversations about friendships forged in outfield conditions, about the satisfaction of completing a demanding exercise, about the quiet pride in wearing the uniform and doing one's part. And, of course, when national servicemen meet, complain about tough training as well. These lived experiences are powerful ones. They humanise defence. They remind us that security is not an abstract idea. It is built by sons, daughters, brothers, sisters, fathers, colleagues. My question therefore is how MINDEF can deepen partnerships with organisations like SAFRA so that they go beyond just being facilities for recreation. Would there be plans to develop programmes within these community platforms that will actively foster inter-generational understanding of NS? For example, perhaps dialogues where veterans and younger Singaporeans can share perspectives on NS, preparedness workshops that involve entire families, activities that integrate the messages of Total Defence into everyday community life. How can SAFRA and similar institutions better engage not only our NSmen, but also spouses, their children and our new citizens as well? Many new Singaporeans may not have grown up with NS is a formative experience. Yet, their sense of belonging and commitment is equally important for us. Can these platforms help them understand our defence story and feel invested in protecting their newly adopted home? Ultimately, defence in the community should be visible in small but telling ways. Parents who instinctively teach their children resilience and preparedness, neighbours who check on one another during crises, young Singaporeans who see NS not merely as an obligation, but as a shared rite of passage, and new citizens who speak of Singapore's security as their responsibility as well.”
“Chairman, Total Defence has never been just about equipment. It has always been about people. And it is about whether every Singaporean understands his or her stake in this country and appreciates the role that NS plays in keeping Singapore safe. Operational readiness remains critical of course. But without sustained community support and identification with the institution of NS, our defence posture will gradually hollow out. As our society continues to evolve and becomes more prosperous and comfortable, defence concerns can easily slip to the back of our minds. Families today juggle work pressures, children’s education, caregiving for elderly parents and of course, rising costs of living. Young professionals are focused on career advancement and personal aspirations. It is natural that defence issues do not feature prominently in daily conversation. The peace and stability we have enjoyed for decades also make existential threats feel distant. Security becomes assumed rather than consciously valued. This is precisely why community institutions matter more now than ever. They bridge the gap between our defence needs and everyday life. They keep defence awareness alive in spaces where Singaporeans already gather. Therefore, SAFRA is one such important institution. It has clubhouses across the island and a large membership base. It is where national servicemen meet friends, where families send their children for classes, where people exercise, dine and unwind. I have personally spent time at SAFRA facilities with my family as many Members would have. These are ordinary moments, but they are also opportunities. Around us are NSmen who have trained together, served together and carry stories of hardship, camaraderie and pride.”
“Singapore has a responsibility to strengthen ties with other middle powers, uphold the multilateral system, and stabilise trade networks. When rules are challenged, we must stand up to defend them. This too is part of the purpose of the Budget’s support for diplomacy and international engagement. Singapore has never grown amidst an environment of certainty. Our independence was uncertain. Financial crises were uncertain. The pandemic was uncertain. Yet each time, we relied on two things: resilience and unity. When the next wave rises, we will have the resources, societal trust and capable people. As long as we continue to move forward together, Singapore will continue to rise! Today is the eighth Day of the Lunar New Year, I wish for favourable weather and good harvests and peace and prosperity for the country and its people. (In English): Mr Speaker, I support the Budget.”
“Children aged zero to six receive $500 in annual support, with additional essentials provided in partnership with businesses. From early childhood education to parent-child bonding and nutrition, we walk step by step with families. This is not a large-scale subsidy. It is a long-term investment. These measures may not be large in scale, but they are concrete. The meaning of policy lies not only in national figures, but in the small sigh of relief in everyday life. A Budget is not merely a fiscal document. It paints a picture of the society we want. Let me use a New Year metaphor: the Yusheng. Yesterday was the seventh day of the Lunar New Year, we all did "lohei". The fish represents the economic foundation. If the fish is not fresh, nothing else matters. AI adoption, enterprise transformation, and industry upgrading ensure that the fish remains fresh. And may our Budgets always have surplus. The shredded vegetables represent skills and education. Future security comes from adaptable capabilities, not fixed positions. Peanuts and sesame represent social support. Support for families, seniors and the vulnerable ensures that society can move forward together over the long term. This is no small matter. The sauce represents our we-first spirit. Not "what do I get?" But "how far can we go together?" Each ingredient alone seems ordinary. But combined together, they create the flavour of the New Year. Fiscal discipline is like the golden crackers simple in appearance, yet holding the entire structure together. Coming to the earlier topic, as great power rivalry intensifies and international law and trade rules come under strain, small and middle powers must cooperate more closely.”
“Of course, no one says they enjoy paying taxes. But what would truly be unfair is not adjusting tax policy today, it would be having to raise taxes suddenly during a downturn tomorrow. The real question is not whether we can spend more in any particular year, but whether we can support Singaporeans sustainably over the coming decades. Singapore's fiscal philosophy has always been simple: plan early, act prudently, share gains when conditions allow. This is not poor marksmanship. It is long-range targeting. When conditions turn out better than expected, the Government returns support to citizens through various packages. That is precisely the meaning of preparedness. As an ancient text puts it: "Digging a well when thirsty is inferior to preparing before the rain." We would rather be called conservative today than be forced into hurried tax increases tomorrow. When the world is uncertain, when great power rivalry intensifies, when supply chains and financial systems can shift overnight, a surplus is not a luxury. It is insurance. If the next storm arrives, we will not need to borrow in haste, raise taxes suddenly, or cut social support. That is true fiscal responsibility. Let me say candidly: a fiscal surplus does not mean people feel no pressure. Residents do not speak to us about macroeconomic indicators. They speak about daily life. They worry about: (a) whether AI will replace their jobs; (b) whether prices will continue to rise; (c) whether shop rentals will increase again; and (d) whether families can sustain expenses over the long term. These concerns are real. Therefore, a Budget must be macro-sound and micro-relevant. In the North West District, we run Little Steps @ North West, supporting families participating in KidSTART.”
“When the Government runs a deficit, it is criticised as fiscally irresponsible. When it runs a surplus, it is said to have miscalculated. It is like a person who brings an umbrella and is mocked for being excessive, and yet if he does not bring one and gets drenched, he is mocked for being foolish. National finances are not month-end accounts. They are an inter-generational responsibility. In recent years, our Budgets have not only met fiscal targets, we have won a larger battle. Because today, we have a surplus. Therefore, We have more "ammunition" to face the storms ahead. A surplus does not mean over-taxation. It means that in an uncertain world, we planned using conservative assumptions and reality has turned out better than expected. If we had planned using optimistic assumptions instead and subsequently found ourselves unable to pay for healthcare, ageing and security, who would bear the cost? Not the accountants. Not the commentators. It is the people. As the ancient saying goes: "One survives in adversity and perishes in comfort." When a budget aims to be "just enough", it often ends up being "slightly short". In such a world, we must build strength and prepare in advance. Before troops move, provisions must be ready. The bow must be fully drawn and the arrows well supplied. Only then can we act effectively when the need arises. We must clarify a basic principle: GST is a long-term structural revenue source. A fiscal surplus is largely cyclical. Long-term responsibilities cannot be funded by short-term fortune. Ageing does not disappear with economic cycles. Healthcare spending does not fluctuate simply because one year is strong and another is weak. Using cyclical revenue to fund permanent obligations is like using your bonus to pay a mortgage.”
“Mr Speaker, in Mandarin, please. (In Mandarin): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Mr Speaker, the past few years have not been calm for the world. We have just emerged from the pandemic, yet global recovery has been hesitant. Businesses have had to reorganise their supply chains and families have had to readjust the rhythms of daily life. Just as many thought we were entering a new phase of stability, global politics suddenly shifted gears and circumstances changed rapidly. Some commentators have even described this as a kind of "gangster-style" logic in international conduct. Rules have become negotiable. Agreements can be signed and just as easily overturned. The US Supreme Court struck down the tariff measures and shortly thereafter, a new 15% tariff was announced on all countries, friends and foe alike. This is not the textbook version of globalisation. It is a more direct and raw contest of power. Great power politics has returned. US-China competition continues to intensify. The Middle East remains tense, with the shadow of Iran still looming. Small and middle powers are increasingly pressured to declare positions and choose sides. When large waves crash against the shore, small boats feel the impact first. Singapore is not a bystander. We are a small and open economy. When storms arise, we are among the first to feel them. But amidst the storms, what ships fear most is not only the external waves, but also internal friction. Unity cannot be merely a slogan; it is the prerequisite for maintaining strategic resolve in a complex world. Therefore, in such a world, this Budget is not merely about numerical balance, but national assurance. After the Budget Statement, over the past few days, I have heard some interesting comments.”
“Yes, Mr Deputy Speaker. Thank you to the hon Member for the clarification. With regard to his clarification on the performance, I would like to clarify with him if it is accurate to say that he is referring to specific performances of specific sports during the SEA Games, rather than the overall performance which was markedly better in 2025 than in previous SEA Games.”
“Yes, Mr Deputy Speaker, just two clarifications for the hon Member. I note in his speech that he used the words that he proposes amendment, in terms of the size of the Council. Is the Member proposing a formal amendment to the Bill or is he making a suggestion? Secondly, he has made an assertion that we should reflect on the results of the 2025 SEA Games. I am not sure by what measure he is referring to, because certainly in terms of medal haul, it was a record of 202 medals: I think 51 gold, 43 silver and 64 bronze. That is way more than what we had in 2023. So, I am not sure how he came to the conclusion that we did not perform better in 2025.”
“The planned relocation of SSP to Kallang, alongside national training centres, sports science and sports medicine facilities, is particularly promising. It signals a whole-of-ecosystem approach to Team Singapore development, from youth to elite levels. We will miss the school in the North West district, but we wish it well when it does relocate. I do look forward to further details at the COS, particularly on how athlete welfare, dual career planning and post-sporting transitions will be strengthened under this consolidated model. Our duty is not just to produce champions but to ensure that those who wear the Singapore crest proudly emerge with dignity, resilience and viable futures beyond sport. Mr Deputy Speaker, taken together, these amendments reflect a maturing sporting nation in Singapore; a nation that values inclusion alongside excellence; participation alongside performance; standards alongside accessibility; and ambition alongside with a caring ecosystem. SportSG's growing role must continue to be exercised with humility, partnership, accountability and transparency. Sport thrives not by central control but by enabling communities, athletes, volunteers as well as professionals to flourish together. I support this Bill because it provides the right statutory foundation for the next phase of Singapore sports, a phase that is more inclusive, more diverse, more professional and more humane. One team, one dream, one Singapore. Mr Deputy Speaker, I support the Bill.”
“It allows the sector to mature, to professionalise and to align voluntarily around best practices. Initiatives, such as the Safe Sport Commission, the NROC and the NREP, have already raised confidence across the ecosystem. I would encourage SportSG to continue engaging multiple stakeholders, especially smaller clubs and independent coaches, so that standards uplift rather than exclude. Because professionalism should be enabling, not burdensome. Over time, Mr Deputy Speaker, as the sector continues to mature, there may be merit in reviewing whether certain baseline protections should become mandatory. But the present approach, to me, strikes the right balance between leadership and flexibility. Fourth and lastly, on holistic education and career support for our athletes. Mr Deputy Speaker, perhaps the most far-reaching amendment in this Bill is the empowerment of SportSG to establish and oversee institutions that develop our national athletes across both sporting and academic domains. The consolidation of the SSP and the High Performance Sport Institute into a single entity represents a significant shift in how we think about our athlete development. For too long, young athletes have been forced to navigate parallel systems – one focused on sporting excellence; another on academic progression. Integration therefore allows us to design truly athlete-centric pathways, where education and sports reinforce rather than compete with each other. The SSP retaining its identity as a school is important. Education must remain a pillar, not as a concession. But strengthening its role as the education arm of our high-performance system ensures that sporting ambition does not come at the expense of future options.”
“Singapore, as the Minister has described, has hosted various events, such as the World Chess Championships and the Olympic Esports Week as well. These, to me, are not fringe pursuits. They are globally recognised domains of excellence as well. At the same time, I do appreciate the Bill's careful calibration that recognising the sports may not automatically mean equal funding or blanket support. SportSG retains the discretion to assess governance standards, athlete pathways and alignment with national objectives. This, to me, is important. We should be inclusive without being indiscriminate. Public resources must continue to be stewarded carefully and transparently. I would, however, ask SportSG to continue communicating clearly with the public on how decisions are made, especially when certain popular activities may not receive immediate support, because transparency helps us to build trust, even when not all aspirations can be funded immediately. Third, Mr Deputy Speaker, on uplifting standards across the sports industry. Because as participation grows, standards matter more, not less. The Bill provides SportSG with the mandate to establish and maintain quality standards and codes of practice for coaching, equipment, facilities and accreditation systems. I support this direction. Parents entrust their children to coaches. Athletes entrust their bodies and careers to training systems. Recreational participants as well deserve safe environments and competent instruction. Standards protect not only performance but more importantly the people who participate. I note the assurance that SportSG does not seek to become a regulator at this point in time and that standards will not, at this moment, be legally binding. This calibrated approach is sensible.”
“Secondly, on supporting diverse sporting aspirations. The Bill updates the statutory understanding of what sport is and in doing so, reflects how Singaporeans actually live, train and compete today. Beyond competitive and recreational sport, the Bill explicitly empowers SportSG to promote physical fitness activities, mind sports and e-sports. This is a pragmatic and necessary evolution. Physical fitness activities are foundational to public health, especially in an ageing society like Singapore. Programmes under ActiveSG, as well as local efforts, such as the North West Healthy Living Festival, recognise that many Singaporeans may not aspire to competitive sport, but still seek structured, social and motivating ways to stay active. As an example, the North West Brisk Walking Club has grown into, what is perhaps, Singapore's largest and most consistent community fitness movements, with a strong membership base of 70,000 spanning seniors, working adults and families. What has also been particularly encouraging is its recent evolution, across all the five Community Development Councils (CDCs). With the launch of CDC Walking Trails, the intentional design of routes to be more accessible, scenic, gamified and digitally supported, we have seen, since its launch in August 2025, a broadening participation of over 85,000, including many younger residents and first-time exercisers. When we invest thoughtfully in simple, inclusive physical activity, we lower the barriers to participation and bring more Singaporeans into physically active lifestyles. Mind sports, such as chess, bridge and e-sports, reflect cognitive skills, discipline and international competitiveness.”
“The proposed amendments give SportSG the clarity, mandate and flexibility to meet these realities responsibly. I will, therefore, focus my remarks on four broad areas: inclusion and disability sport; the broadening of what we recognise as sport; standards and professionalism in our sports ecosystem; and finally, the holistic development of our athletes across sporting and educational pathways. First, on disability sport and inclusion. Mr Deputy Speaker, in my view, one of the most important shifts reflected in this Bill is the formal recognition of the SNPC as a key partner of SportSG. This is alongside the SNOC and the NSAs. This is not merely symbolic. It is a signal of intent. The refreshed DSMP made it clear that inclusion is not an adjunct to our sporting system. It must be integral to it. Athletes with disabilities do not exist on the margins of Team Singapore. They are Team Singapore. So, therefore, formal recognition of the SNPC strengthens accountability, coordination and partnership across the entire sporting ecosystem. It enables clearer alignment in athlete development, competition pathways and event organisation. It also affirms that disability sport deserves the same strategic attention, resourcing discipline and long-term planning as able-bodied sport. I would therefore encourage SportSG, as it operationalises this partnership, to continue investing not only in elite pathways, but also in grassroots access. This includes adaptive facilities, trained coaches and community-level programmes that enable persons with disabilities to engage in sport early and confidently. Inclusion succeeds not when we create parallel systems, but when our mainstream systems are designed with inclusion in mind from the very beginning.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I rise in support of the Bill. This Bill touches on a wide and interconnected sporting ecosystem in Singapore and many of my colleagues will be speaking on its various dimensions. Ms Gho Sze Kee and Ms Valerie Lee will address how we strengthen Team Singapore and disability sport. Dr Charlene Chen, Mr David Hoe and Ms Elysa Chen will speak on mind sports and e-sports, as well as the importance of governance and accreditation. Ms Poh Li San will speak on the importance of board diversity in our sports associations, while Dr Hamid Razak will address the need for a calibrated and disciplined approach to resource allocation. Ms Hazlina Abdul Halim, Mr Yip Hon Weng and Mr Lee Hong Chuang will take a broader view across the Bill's themes. And closing off will be the Deputy Chair of our Government Parliamentary Committee (GPC), Ms Joan Pereira, who will close off the bench's contributions to this debate. Collectively, these contributions will reflect the breadth of the Bill. My remarks today will therefore focus on framing the overall direction of travel, before my colleagues go deeper into the specific policy areas where their suggestions and observations will be made. Mr Deputy Speaker, this Bill reflects how sport in Singapore has evolved over the last decade and, more importantly, how it must continue to evolve if it is to serve not just our medal ambitions but also our people, our social compact and our national identity. At its very core, this Bill recognises a simple truth, that sport today is not just confine to podiums, pitches or to the playing fields. It is increasingly also about inclusion, health, character, opportunity and lifelong participation.”
“Mr Speaker, I thank the Minister for outlining the range of existing support schemes. Having served previously in NSAs, I think our athletes would be very happy to hear that a review will be undertaken. I just have a very simple supplementary question. Could the Minister share with us what is a possible timeline by which SportSG will be working with SNOC on the review of cash incentives and recognition for our SEA Games medalists, especially those who are in silver and bronze categories?”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I thank the Minister of State for his answers earlier. Could the Minister of State reassure the public the current inspection enforcement regime during construction and renovation works is assessed to be sufficiently robust, given that these time periods where the confluence of hot works, temporary wiring and flammable materials significantly heighten risk, as we saw in in the tragic example in Tai Po? Building on the point that the hon Member, Mr Ng Chee Meng, mentioned earlier as well, in terms of community efforts, in my constituency, we organise regular block evacuation exercises so that residents are better prepared on evacuation routes and looking out for one another. What we saw from the Tai Po example, from interviews with survivors, as well as some of the experiences of those who were trapped, it is that many did not take the initial evacuation alert seriously enough and that may have contributed to the increased number of fatalities. With a growing number of vulnerable and elderly residents, is there more that the Ministry can do to heighten evacuation awareness, especially with the higher density and taller residential developments that we have today?”
“Mr Speaker, I have three clarifications for the Minister. We had an intense debate on this in the same House in 2017. Given the same sensitivities surrounding 38 Oxley Road, will the Government consider structured public engagement or consultation when developing the interpretative plans to ensure that the eventual design fosters unity and avoids reopening old political disputes? Secondly, the Minister also mentioned that the Government intends to come to a decision within this term of government. For the sake of public clarity, could the Minister outline the key project milestones that Singaporeans can expect from now until the final configuration, if the site is decided to be preserved? Lastly, Sir, Minister has also taken pains to explain that the preservation decision concerns national memory and not personalities. Could the Minister elaborate how the Government will communicate this to the public so as to avoid misconception that this is an attempt to memorialise any individual rather than our shared independence journey?”
“On monitoring and review, what are the mechanisms that will be available to monitor the impact of these changes over the next few years? Regular publication of disability assessment data, appeals statistics and processing times will also strengthen transparency. Ultimately, social and health initiatives often compete for limited fiscal space and must demonstrate measurable outcomes within short cycles. Yet, long-term care, by its very nature, requires patient sustained investment in our caregivers, in community infrastructure, and preventative programmes. We must continue to find ways to bridge support gaps through deeper partnership, flexible funding models and a mindset that sees care not as a cost but as a shared responsibility and a social investment in our collective future. CareShield Life is also ultimately very important as part of our care framework. But by its very nature, it is abstract and its technical design makes it difficult for many to understand. Compared to ordinary health insurance, disability-type insurance is less intuitive to many people. It is hard to internalise eligibility criteria, payout triggers, limitations on how premiums evolve. And therefore, this requires much more public education. And I do urge the Ministry to continually inform and educate our public on the importance of CareShield Life and how it operates. By 2030, one in four Singaporeans will be aged 65 or above. The CareShield Life Scheme is a key pillar of our response to this demographic transformation. This Bill is not merely about technical amendments, but it is about how families experience vulnerability, care and experience dignity. I therefore support this Bill and I believe the suggestions that I raised today can make a good Bill even better.”
“Will MOH issue updated clinical guidance and ensure that our assessors receive the adequate training to apply the criteria consistently? Appeals processes should also be transparent and timely. Clearer public guidelines with case examples and possibly tele-assessments for bedridden patients will reduce stress for families. Secondly, on digital service and inclusion. The shift to digital service is practical, but many affected groups are seniors with limited digital literacy. How will MOH ensure that they are not disadvantaged by missed notices? A "phygital" model should be the default for critical documents, such as demand notes. Community partners, such as the Silver Generation Office, the Infocomm Media Development Authority, media literacy ambassadors and the Community Development Councils (CDCs) can support vulnerable groups in managing their digital interactions. Thirdly, financial sustainability. The additional subsidies is commendable, but as payouts rise and our population ages, how stable will premiums remain over the longer term? Regular public actuarial reports, similar to CPF's, can build trust. MOH could also consider more progressive subsidies for middle-income families who may not qualify for help but still shoulder heavy caregiving burdens. CareShield Life also operates in conjunction with many other schemes such as the Home Caregiving Grant and Medisave withdrawals for long-term care. How will MOH ensure that families experience these as a coherent ecosystem, rather than fragmented programmes? A one-stop care portal perhaps, that integrates financial, medical and social services could be a meaningful difference for families navigating sudden disability events.”
“] Mr Deputy Speaker, this amendment reflects that the Government's care for the elderly and persons with disabilities, and demonstrates our society's sense of responsibility and foresight when facing the challenges of an ageing population. As society rapidly ages, more and more families will face the pressure of long-term care. Whether due to age-related disability, or mobility difficulties caused by illness or accidents, long-term care is no longer "someone else's problem", but rather "a common issue for all of us". This amendment makes the definition of "disability" clearer and more consistent, whilst also ensuring that document servicing channels are more convenient and effective. Although these amendments appear to be technical, they concern whether families can receive timely assistance and protection in their caregiving journey. I also hope that when the Government implements electronic servicing, it can consider the actual circumstances of elderly people and vulnerable groups, avoiding situations where they miss important information due to the digital divide. We can combine physical letters with social media to ensure no information is missed. Most importantly, we must continue to make "dignified ageing" our goal, establishing a reliable and compassionate long-term care system that allows every citizen to face the future with peace of mind. (In English): While I support the Bill, I would like to raise a few clarifying questions and suggestions to strengthen its implementation. Firstly, on assessment criteria and appeals. On the new "not disabled" definition: some individuals have progressive or cognitive disabilities that do not neatly fit into the six ADLs. How will these cases be fairly assessed?”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, I rise in support of the CareShield Life and Long-Term Care (Amendment) Bill. This Bill continues the Government's careful and compassionate work to strengthen our national framework of long-term care, ensuring that no Singaporean faces the challenges of severe disability or extended care needs alone. It reaffirms our social compact, that as we build a more inclusive "we first" society, we also build systems that allow Singaporeans to age with dignity, security and peace of mind. For me, this Bill does two things. Firstly, it redefines the circumstances under which the CareShield Life Scheme applies by introducing a clear definition of "not disabled" in a new Fourth Schedule and by clarifying automatic coverage rules for individuals becoming Citizens or Permanent Residents after the scheme’s commencement. Secondly, it modernises the service of documents provisions, including a new section 61A that allows notices, such as demand notes, to be served through multiple channels, including email and approved digital platforms. This of course reflects the way that Singaporeans increasingly communicate, ensuring that administrative processes keep pace with technological advancements. These legislative enhancements coincide with significant policy shifts as well. In August 2025, the Government accepted the CareShield Life Council’s recommendations for the 2025 Review. These include higher payouts to meet long-term care needs and a $575 million in additional premium subsidies to cushion the increase for households. These changes ensure that CareShield Life remains financially sustainable while protecting Singaporeans who develop severe disabilities from being left behind. Mr Deputy Speaker, in Mandarin. (In Mandarin): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.”
“Mr Speaker, Singapore may be small, but we can be bold, visionary and responsible. Building a "we first" society is not a Government programme – it is a national endeavour. It requires the participation and commitment of every Singaporean. Let us also cherish our hard-earned political stability and protect this valuable asset. Let us work together to maintain Singapore's precious political environment, ensure our political atmosphere remains clean, and enable future generations to grow up in a more united and prosperous Singapore. I support the motion.”
“A "we first" society requires understanding and continuity between generations. We should encourage the formation of mentorship groups, pairing youth with experienced seniors to jointly plan community projects. The combined experience and wisdom of the older generation with the drive and fresh perspectives of the young can create powerful synergies, ensuring both societal stability and vitality. Furthermore, in this age of fragmentation, we need common stories and shared memories more than ever: support projects that document and share "Singapore Stories," focusing not only on national achievements, but also on the contributions of ordinary people, particularly stories of how the younger generation actively participates in and transforms communities. Develop community archives and digital platforms, allowing every community to preserve and share its history, and enabling youth to become a new force in recording and disseminating these stories. Create arts and cultural programmes that explore the evolving meaning of being Singaporean, encouraging young artists to interpret and enrich our shared identity from contemporary perspectives. These efforts, particularly through activating the proactive participation of our youth, will help us build a society that shares not just a common geographical space, but a profound sense of shared destiny. We must return to the saying with which I began: "In the land of Shu, there were no great generals." It reminds us: to build a "we first" society, we must continuously nurture successors and encourage more young people to enter public service. We cannot rely only on a small elite – we must build a strong pipeline of talent, ensuring that there are always capable people ready to serve.”
“This requires redesigning national education to emphasise that citizens are not only rights-bearers, but also responsibility-takers; developing a grassroots community service framework so that volunteerism becomes a part of life, not just an occasional activity; and creating multicultural competency programmes to equip Singaporeans with the skills to thrive in a diverse society. Here, I must place special emphasis on the crucial role of the younger generation. The hope and impetus for building a "we first" society lie with our youth. They are not just future successors; they are a vital force in shaping the social fabric of the present. Young people are intellectually active, full of ideals, and possess a natural affinity for fairness, justice and sustainable development. We must create greater space for them, closely integrating their energy and creativity with our shared vision for the future. Specifically, first, we must genuinely listen to and trust our youth. Our engagement cannot be merely symbolic. We must substantively incorporate their ideas into policy considerations. When formulating long-term plans, the voices of young people must be heard and their suggestions should have the opportunity to be translated into concrete actions. Second, we must empower our youth to be the protagonists of community innovation. MCCY should support young people in independently launching projects that solve community problems, enabling their transition from being passive recipients of policy to active co-creators. This hands-on experience in building is the most effective way to foster a sense of ownership and belonging to the nation. Third, we must build solid bridges for intergenerational collaboration.”
“The greatest challenge the world faces today is not economic or military – it is the crisis of social cohesion. Individualism and a "me first" mindset are eroding the foundations of many societies. Singapore must choose a different path. To build a “we first” society, politically, all parties must prioritise the national interest, transcending partisan disputes. In policy, people should not only ask, "What is in it for me?" but also, "Is this fair for our society?" In daily life, we must care for one another, leaving no one behind. The Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth (MCCY) has a special role to play in this. I believe the Ministry should lead this paradigm shift from "me" to "we", redefining our social compact through three key areas. Community building must go beyond festive events and occasional activities. We need to establish deep community connectivity programmes, encouraging residents to not only to know each other as neighbours, but to become mutual support systems; develop Community Shared Spaces 2.0 – transforming them into real living labs, not just physical spaces; and create intergenerational collaboration projects, bringing the young and old together to solve community problems, facilitating the exchange of wisdom and innovation. MCCY should lead this effort, shifting community building from activity-based projects to building a relational ecosystem. We need not merely law-abiding citizens, but community members who actively contribute.”
“All of this reminds us – political stability is not inevitable; it is a fragile asset that can easily be lost. In stark contrast, Singapore stands out. We have just completed a smooth, stable and mature leadership transition. The Prime Minister has changed, but policies remain consistent; the nation's direction continues and public confidence remains strong. Amid global turmoil, Singapore's institutions, culture and mutual trust have forged this hard-won stability. This is our advantage and also our responsibility. The President emphasised the importance of unity in his address, a point that I believe is crucial. The political atmosphere is like the air we breathe; fresh air goes unnoticed and unappreciated, but once it lacks harmony and becomes polluted, everyone feels suffocated. The concept of "harmony" or "hé", as advocated by Confucius, signifies a genuine, principled harmony, and not soulless, superficial conformity. This "hé" refers to harmonious and dedicated efforts towards the common, supreme goal of national development and the people's welfare. We must maintain a high degree of consensus on this major objective. This is the foundation upon which we can pool our strengths and accomplish great things. This is the "harmony of the gentleman", a unity stemming from shared ideals and beliefs. In this Parliament, we encourage constructive debate. However, if the purpose is to deliberately create confrontation for political gain, while disregarding the overall national development, this closely resembles what Confucius criticised as "conformity without harmony". This is why the President and the Prime Minister have repeatedly reminded us that true democracy is not "me first," but "we first." This is the most valuable aspect of Singapore's political culture.”
“I rise to support the Motion of Thanks to the President. In Mandarin, please. (In Mandarin): Today, I wish to borrow an old saying from Chinese history to reflect on Singapore's future: "In the land of Shu, there were no great generals, so Liao Hua had to serve as the vanguard." This saying is not just a historical reference – it serves as a stark warning for us today. This phrase comes from the period of the Three Kingdoms. In its later years, the Kingdom of Shu faced a severe shortage of talent. Zhuge Liang had passed away, and Jiang Wei was struggling to hold things together. Eventually, with limited military strength, Shu had to appoint Liao Hua – an ageing and less capable officer – as its vanguard. Later generations lamented: when a nation or team lacks capable people, it will have no one to turn to at critical moments. Although the original saying carries a tone of irony and helplessness, we should treat it today as a wake-up call. If a country fails to continually nurture talent and establish a robust leadership succession system, it risks being unprepared when crisis strikes. Singapore must never repeat such a mistake. The current state of the world is deeply concerning – recurring political violence in the United States, severely testing its democratic system; continuous disputes between left and right wings in Europe; frequent changes in leadership in Japan and South Korea, leading to a lack of policy continuity and stability; major electoral recalls and social divisions in Taiwan, severely damaging trust between the government and the people; ongoing political disputes following elections in several Southeast Asian countries; endless conflicts in the Middle East and the Russo-Ukrainian war, with peace nowhere in sight.”
“Thank you, Mr Chairman. Clarification for the Minister of State. She spoke at length earlier about the NLB as well as adoption of AI. As we know, AI is quite ubiquitous today, so how will NLB ensure that the adoption of AI remains respectful towards authors and content creators, and of course not diminish the value of creativity and hard work in coming out with content? 2.45 pm”
“Accessible Digital Services Mr Chairman, how will the Ministry ensure our digital services truly leave no one behind, especially our seniors and people with disabilities? As we forge ahead with smart initiatives and digital transformation, how will these advances remain equitable and accessible to vulnerable groups in our society? We know that technology can be intimidating at times, even exclusionary, if not implemented thoughtfully. Will the Ministry, therefore, be introducing new standards or guidelines to ensure our websites, apps and other digital resources are user-friendly for individuals with varying needs? Finally, how will the Ministry measure success, track progress and provide transparent updates so that we can be assured that every segment of our community benefits from our digital future? I would like to also take the opportunity to affirm the staff of MDDI and associated agencies for the work that they do in advancing an inclusive and informed nation through digital transformation. I have worked with many of them on various projects, and I can attest to their passion and dedication in making lives more closely connected and digitally-efficient, yet also so tremendously people-centred. Thank you to everyone for their work. 1.00 pm NRIC – Leading Inter-agency Coordination”
“Mr Chairman, I love the libraries when I was growing up. A visit to the National Library at Fort Canning or the regional libraries was always a real treat. I, therefore, rise to invite the Ministry to update the House on how our public libraries will be evolving to support a future-ready Singapore. In particular, libraries have long been a cornerstone of community enrichment. Yet, the digital age calls for more innovative approaches to learning. What new initiatives can we expect to see in our libraries that will encourage greater tech adoption and skills acquisition for all Singaporeans? Furthermore, how will these initiatives be scaled up for different age groups, especially our seniors, so that everyone, regardless of digital fluency, can benefit? Libraries should not just be repositories of books, but living, breathing testbeds of new knowledge and digital hands-on experiences. I look forward to hearing how the Ministry plans to bring these transformative opportunities to the heart of our communities. Civil Discourse in Online Space In our interconnected world, social media and digital platforms are powerful tools for community building. Yet, they can also be fertile breeding grounds for harmful discourse, misinformation and polarising narratives that threaten our social fabric. We have long prided ourselves on our cohesive society and we must not let online vitriol undermine our unity. Youths, in particular, are vulnerable to the negative influences in these digital spaces. Could the Minister please share the Ministry’s strategic efforts to foster civic-mindedness on the Internet, be it through digital literacy programmes, collaborative initiatives with community groups or targeted policies encouraging responsible online behaviour?”
“Sir, Singapore's racial and religious harmony has long been the foundation of our social fabric. Yet, in today's volatile global landscape and with recent reports of far-right extremism, even in our midst, we must acknowledge that this precious harmony cannot be taken for granted. We do not inherit harmony, we continue to build on it. It is therefore incumbent on all of us to remain vigilant in preserving this unity. I would therefore like to ask the Ministry for its assessment of the current state of racial and religious relations, and how our agencies are anticipating emerging threats in this space. We have seen how technology and social media can amplify divisive ideologies, enabling dangerous actors to find like-minded communities or target the vulnerable with disinformation. In this fight against extremism, it is essential that stakeholders – community groups, religious organisations, educational institutions and the general public – partner with the Government. Community organisations can serve as first responders on the ground, spotting early warning signs and offering constructive channels for dialogue. Religious leaders can build bridges of understanding through inter-faith activities, fostering trust and empathy among different communities. The public, too, has a critical role to play: by promoting open conversations, reporting suspicious activities and rejecting hateful rhetoric, whenever it arises. As we continue to navigate an increasingly complex security environment, may we always be guided by vigilance, empathy and unity. I therefore seek the Ministry's views on how we may deepen our collective efforts to safeguard Singapore's social harmony, ensuring that future generations can inherit a society bound together by respect and mutual understanding.”
“Mr Chairman, in our increasingly complex external environment, where information flows freely and narratives can be shaped by foreign actors, Singaporeans risk being influenced by interests that may run counter to our nation's well-being, worse still becoming useful idiots to foreign causes. To safeguard against this, MFA must play a crucial role in keeping our citizens well-informed about our foreign policy principles, core national interests and the broader geopolitical context. By communicating openly through regular updates, public briefings and community engagements, MFA ensures that Singaporeans understand how our foreign policy decisions are made and why they matter. This knowledge strengthens our national resilience against attempts at foreign influence. Beyond that, I hope MFA can share how it partners with other agencies to develop media literacy programmes and help Singaporeans evaluate information and detect malicious campaigns. Singapore's Relations with India”