Eric Chua
Singapore
“Chairman, thank you for your indulgence. I would like to set right a couple of points in my speech earlier before Members seek clarifications. Firstly, I mentioned that enhancements we provide additional financial relief for 3,600 PwDs accessing our residential and community disabilities services. The number should be 3,800.”
“Sir, I thank the Member for her very passionate interventions over the past years as well. First, on job redesign. Under the existing Open Door Programme, there is a Job Redesign Grant that can already be applied for, so that is one potential avenue that we can point to.”
“And I behove all Members of the Chamber to also support these home-based businesses, because many of them, for instance, Bakes by Ben and his mum. They are making a living.”
“We must treat it as solvable. We cannot eliminate temptation, but we should not normalise harm. If technology has industrialised temptation, then our response must be to industrialise resilience: thoughtfully, proportionately, with care. Let us not hesitate simply because the subject is uncomfortable.”
“Sir, I thank the Member for his clarifications. On the provisions of information in vernacular languages on the website, I think that is something that we can potentially explore and look at.”
“I am also grateful for the IJT members across the private and public sectors – lawyers, policy-makers, law enforcement officers, social service professionals, healthcare experts, community partners and caregiver representatives. Sir, to be sure, we face both challenges and disruptions, but also tremendous opportunities.”
The complete record
Every one of 432 lines we hold for Eric Chua, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 3 of 9.
“Today, such PwDs are engaged by multiple services, such as Day Activity Centres and Sheltered Workshops. These programmes can be organised more conveniently and provide opportunities to build up skills for independence. Therefore, the new Enabling Skills for Life Programme Proof-of-Concept will be launched from 2025 to 2028, to support PwDs in lifelong learning. With the Enabling Skills for Life Programme, PwDs will be better served with a single service catering to their evolving learning needs and they will benefit from a curriculum focused on independent living, communication and language, and social-emotional skills, without needing to move between multiple services. Our second key thrust of support is to empower PwDs to live and participate in the community. Allow me to share Ms Ann's story. Ann is a former client of TOUCH Ubi Hostel. After leaving the hostel, she continued participating in TOUCH's outreach programmes but was only able to do so infrequently due to a long commute. Since October last year, the new Enabling Services Hub (ESH) @ Jurong has brought opportunities closer to where she lives. I recently met Ann at Taman Jurong CC. Like my son, Ann loves collecting Pokémon cards. So, I promptly suggested catching up over a happy meal. From our conversation, I learnt that Ann works part-time at Subway, takes part in continual education and learning courses and makes friends by volunteering at ESH@Jurong's events. Staying in a job and being in touch with the community have bolstered Ann's her self-confidence, empowering her to lead an independent and fulfilling life. We want to support PwDs like Ms Ann to live independently in our community. This is an area that Ms Denise Phua is interested in.”
“Ms Denise Phua will be happy to note that the EBH provides a longer and more intensive job support for those who need it. At the firm level, we want to ensure that employers and workplaces are inclusive, too. Miss Rachel Ong, Ms Denise Phua and Mr Ong Hua Han asked about this, and we do so by providing support through multiple approaches, legal protections, wage offsets, workplace modifications, capability building and recognition frameworks. First, in the legal domain, we have strengthened protections for persons with disabilities through the Workplace Fairness Bill that was passed in this House a few months ago. Ms Carrie Tan will also be pleased to know that the tripartite partners are developing a Tripartite Advisory on Reasonable Accommodations to raise awareness and guide employers in adjusting jobs or work environments to better support PwDs. Second the Government provides wage offsets to firms that hire PwDs. As shared at MOM's Committee of Supply debate, the Enabling Employment Credit will be extended till end-2028 to support the employment of PwDs. Third, employers who are keen to hire PwDs may need to purchase equipment or modify the workplace or job scope. We encourage this and provide the Job Redesign Grant to defray the costs of these modifications. Fourth, to foster an inclusive workplace culture, it is important to build confidence and skills to interact with, integrate and include PwDs at the workplace. Training grants and workshops are available to organisations. Fifth, we recognise and benchmark firms for their best practices and outcomes in disability-inclusive employment via the Enabling Mark Accreditation framework. Lastly, those unable to work are also not left behind. Instead, we enhance their opportunities for lifelong learning.”
“The employment rate of PwDs aged between 15 and 64 has increased, from 28.2% in 2019 to 2020, to 33.6% in 2023 to 2024, and we will continue to push towards our goal of 40% by 2030. Our employment strategy starts upstream, to strengthen work-readiness of students transitioning from school to work. We thank Ms Denise Phua and Mr Ong Hua Han for their queries in this area. I am pleased to share that the Institute of Technical Education (ITE) and SG Enable's internship and employment support programme will be enhanced to provide further employment support to more students with disabilities. This includes pre-employment training, career exploration and post-graduation job placement with up to one year of on-site support. For those needing more time to prepare for work after graduation from special education (SPED) schools, we will progressively expand the School-to-Work (S2W) and job support in key sectors that already have or the potential to employ PwDs. Beyond the transition, from school, we are also doing more to support persons with disabilities towards meaningful employment. At the sectoral level, we are taking a targeted approach to curate job opportunities in six key sectors that either already traditionally hire or can offer suitable jobs to PwDs. And these include F&B, retail trade, health and social services, amongst others. Within these sectors, SG Enable will identify and develop inclusive hiring champions among Enabling Mark-accredited companies and SkillsFuture "Queen Bee" companies to engage and inspire others to hire inclusively. 12.15 pm In 2023, we launched the Enabling Business Hub (EBH) at Jurong which is a showcase of inclusive employment in an industry-specific setting, in this case, logistics.”
“This is a multi-year, iterative process, where we build upon each other's ideas, so that the solutions that we land on are ultimately robust and sustainable. Our laser focus on better serving our families remains at the heart of what we do. So, let us work together, take this sector to the next level, so that we can continue to be that bright beacon of hope, that wind beneath the wings of our families that keeps them safe from the vagaries of life. I will now share our progress and upcoming efforts to support PwDs and their families. We are committed to enabling PwDs to work and live in the community. I thank Mr Baey Yam Keng and Ms Denise Phua for their questions on the EMP2030 and synergy between MSF and our partners. Our fourth Enabling Masterplan, EMP2030, envisions Singapore in 2030 as a place that includes and empowers persons with disabilities to achieve their aspirations. To ensure we are on the right track, Mr Ong Hua Han can be assured that we regularly conduct surveys on the well-being and experiences of PwDs, including in the workplace, through the Disability and Inclusion Panel Study (DIPS) and Public Attitudes Study. These inform our EMP2030 strategies, raise public awareness and promote inclusivity. Under EMP2030, we want to blunt the post-18 cliff effect that PwDs and their family members face. Therefore, we commit to making progress in two main areas. First, strengthening support for PwDs to pursue employment and lifelong learning. Second, empowering PwDs to live independently in the community. First, on employment. Employment is not just about a monthly paycheck. It is also a source of social connection, dignity and it is what many PwDs aspire to, as they apply their skills meaningfully through work.”
“For instance, robotic process automation reduces the administrative burden on Child Protection Officers. Third, as mentioned in an op-ed in Lianhe Zaobao, the challenges we face present an opportunity to strengthen and establish a uniquely Singaporean model of family services. Underpinning all that we do is our desire to better serve families that we work with. That is why we are working with social service agencies to strengthen the family services sector. In June 2024, MSF convened the Family Services Review Committee. Prof Tan Tai Yong, President of the Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS), and I co-chair the Committee to consider ways in which we can deliver services in a more holistic and family-centric manner. Indeed, Assoc Prof Razwana Begum, Mr Melvin Yong and Mr Fahmi Aliman will be happy to know that one issue the Committee is considering is how we can provide care that meets the complex needs of families. This ensures that families are served in a comprehensive, coordinated and convenient way, instead of being "bounced around" multiple services. Fifty representatives from 28 social service agencies and associations are involved across the Committee and Working Groups. Over 200 social service professionals shared their views over multiple engagement sessions, and I personally visited each social service agency and heard from many other stakeholders and partners as well. To be sure, there are many perspectives on how to strengthen the sector. At this juncture, we are keeping an open mind and considering all options and ideas that have been surfaced to us. We are committed to this consultative approach of co-creation. We thank all who have shared their views, and we will continue to listen to you.”
“With this, more families can realise their homeownership aspirations. Chair, we have significantly pivoted our support for lower-income families, moving from assistance to empowerment. We will continue to invest our efforts in this area so that families in need can achieve stability, self-reliance and social mobility. Let me now turn to vulnerable families facing socio-emotional challenges. Singapore's society is evolving. Families are getting smaller. More are staying single. Familial support networks may shrink and weaken over time. With our ageing population, we will see an increase of senior households, social isolation and caregiving stress. The proportion of dual-income families has also grown and more face challenges balancing family commitments and career demands. Domestic violence continues to be an issue faced by some families. We have already seen an increase in the volume and complexity of family service cases social service professionals deal with. This trend will likely continue. To prepare well for the future, we must grab the bull by its horns, tackle the challenges early and head-on. But to be sure, it is not all doom and gloom. First, the social service sector is in a position of strength, having grown in professionalism and recognition over the years. Second, Mr Louis Ng would be happy to know that we are stepping up efforts to manage the heavy demands placed on social service professionals today. Imposing a strict cap on caseloads would be unnecessarily rigid, as the sector needs flexibility in manpower deployment to adapt effectively to operational needs on the ground. We are focusing on other areas and ways to manage the demand, by expanding the sector workforce and enhancing operational efficiency through technology.”
“To this end, we are trialling a new model of support to address the health needs of ComLink+ families later this year. Family coaches will support families in adopting healthier lifestyles through healthier diet, exercise and regular health screenings, among other measures. Dedicated staff from healthcare clusters will help families access services that they need. And for families with complex health conditions, family coaches and healthcare staff will help develop and implement health action plans that prioritise their needs, steps to take and healthcare services to access. Through this, we hope to improve families' overall health, such that they can better pursue their other life goals. We will use insights from the trial to support more families in due course. Second, on housing. Many ComLink+ families in public rental housing aspire to own a home and we are enhancing our support to enable their aspirations in two ways. First, we are partnering the Housing and Development Board (HDB) to provide ComLink+ families with home ownership planning and guidance. As Minister of State Faishal Ibrahim shared, from entry to public rental housing, HDB officers support ComLink+ families in working out the income and savings they need for homeownership. Family coaches will journey with them towards these goals and when they are ready to purchase a flat, HDB will help them navigate the process. Second, we are opening more pathways homeownership through enhancing the Fresh Start Housing Scheme. As Minister of State Faishal has shared, eligible first-time ComLink+ families in public rental housing will be able to buy shorter-lease flats alongside Second-Timer families. The Fresh Start Housing Grant for eligible second-timers will also be increased from $50,000 to $75,000.”
“We now have 260 family coaches and are on track to reach our target of 300 by mid-2025. Each family coach works with 25 to 35 families. Let me share an example of how ComLink+ is progressively making a difference. Mr Riyaz, his wife and their four-year-old daughter, Inayah, live in a 2-room rental flat. A full-time cook, Mr Riyaz is the sole breadwinner while his wife cares for their daughter. Their family coach, Ms Hazriah, built on their aspirations and strengths and marshalled resources to support them. Tapping on the couple's focus on Inayah's education, she emplaced them on the ComLink+ Package for Preschool to incentivise good attendance. She also collaborated with KidSTART in providing and supporting Inayah's child development needs. Mr Riyaz and his wife also hope to find well-paying employment to provide a better life for Inayah. Recognising this, Ms Hazriah emplaced him on the ComLink+ Package for Employment and referred his wife to basic English courses to improve her employment prospects. This is but only one example of how ComLink+ recognises families' strengths, efforts and aspirations and empowers them towards their goals. But we will not stop there. Mr Fahmi Aliman and Mr Melvin Yong will be pleased to know that we will be further integrating services across Government to deliver even more comprehensive, coordinated and convenient support to uplift lower-income families under ComLink+. First, we are weaving health and social support together. Being healthy allows us to live, work and pursue our aspirations. But families trying to make ends meet may find it hard to keep track of medical appointments or need help identifying relevant healthcare services.”
“With ComCare support, families can stabilise their footing and can better pursue longer-term goals of self-reliance and social mobility. 12.00 pm However, social assistance alone addresses immediate needs but may not tackle the underlying causes of challenges or provide longer-term solutions. Moreover, those in need may not have the time or capacity to reach out for support. This is where ComLink+ comes in. Under ComLink+, we go beyond assistance, to empower families to achieve their goals. We proactively reach out to lower-income families and address their needs early. Family coaches journey with them by co-creating action plans tailored to their strengths, needs and goals. Through the ComLink+ Progress Packages, we boost their efforts, providing financial top-ups to those that take action in preschool enrolment and attendance, employment, debt clearance and home ownership. I thank Mr Melvin Yong, Mr Fahmi Aliman, Mr Gan Thiam Poh and Mr Xie Yao Quan for their interest in ComLink+'s progress, including the roll-out of Progress Packages and family coach recruitment. ComLink+ is now supporting around 10,000 families living in public rental housing. It has also been expanded to lower-income families not in public rental housing, but are eligible for the KidSTART programme or have school-going children at risk of long-term absenteeism. The ComLink+ Progress Packages for Preschool and Employment were launched in August and December 2024 respectively. Close to 1,600 families have been emplaced on either or both of these packages. The ComLink+ Packages for Debt Clearance and Home Ownership will be launched in the coming months. To power ComLink+, we need a strong team of committed and professional officers.”
“Chair, this year, Singapore turns 60. As we look ahead, it is important to consider what society we want to be. A lasting goal for Singapore is to remain a place of opportunities and hope. Many Singaporeans want Singapore to continue to be a place where all families thrive, including lower-income and vulnerable families, and those with family members with disabilities. MSF is committed to supporting these families and today, I will share the progress we have made and our way forward. We remain committed to journeying with lower-income families towards stability, self-reliance and social mobility. We started with providing a strong safety net to support those who need help with basic needs. This is the philosophy behind ComCare financial assistance. While families are our first line of support, some may require additional help from the Government and the community. Over the years, we have enhanced ComCare to reflect the evolving cost and definition of basic needs. Recently, studies from the Singapore Management University (SMU) and the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) found that Singapore residents view social activities and the ability to manage minor exigencies as basic needs that the Government and community could share responsibility in providing. That is why, as Prime Minister Wong mentioned in his Budget speech, we will now enhance our social safety net by increasing ComCare Short- to-Medium Term Assistance and Long Term Assistance cash rates to support these needs, alongside our regular review of the ComCare quantum. To Ms Ng Ling Ling's query, ComCare caters for a range of food options so that families can buy food items they prefer without compromising on nutrition. This ensures they need not cut back on food expenditure at the expense of their health.”
“Sir, in 2022, I spoke about the risks of exposure to sexually explicit materials, gaming addiction and other harms online. I emphasised the need for awareness, appropriate interventions and collective efforts from the Government, families and society to create a safer and more constructive online environment. Last year, I highlighted the pervasiveness of digital technology in exposing youths to harmful online content and how unrealistic body standards being purveyed through mainstream and social media platforms have become a source of mental health strain for our society. The online world has become an indispensable part of our lives, offering opportunities for networking, knowledge sharing and content creation. However, it must also be made safer, especially for the young and impressionable. Some have suggested access bans as a solution to online harms, but banning access alone is clearly not the way forward. For instance, social media bans might generate unintended dangers. The premise is: young people are adept at using the Internet. Bans might push them to access social media without their parents' knowledge or prompt them to look for unregulated and hidden areas of the Internet. I, therefore, reiterate my call to the MDDI to dive deeper into how we can shape an online environment that balances safety as well as opportunities for growth. After all, our digital space should remain a constructive platform for young people to network, share knowledge and create content, one that is safer and more conducive for everyone. Online Safety”
“Sir, on Monday, 3 March 2025, the Leader of the Opposition asked in his supplementary question for an explanation of an apparent discrepancy between the ComCare disbursement amounts reported in FY2022 annual report and Ministry of Social and Family Development's (MSF's) Supporting Lower-Income Households Trends Report published in 2024. I would like to clarify that the data in the trends report is reported on a calendar year basis whereas the data in the ComCare annual reports is reported on a financial year basis. But to be complete, I would also like to highlight that the Ministry has issued a correction to the FY2021 and FY2022 ComCare annual reports, which were earlier presented to Parliament. On Friday, 28 February, when preparing for the MSF Committee of Supply, the MSF team reported to their director that there was an error in the FY2021 and FY2022 ComCare annual reports. A corrigenda has since been submitted to Parliament and published. In summary, the total amount of ComCare payments in FY2021 were understated. Hence, the $112.5 million figure cited in the trends report should have been $122.5 million. Nevertheless, the reason for the difference cited in the supplementary question is that the ComCare annual reports refer to the financial year, whereas the trends report refers to the calendar year.”
“Speaker, Sir, with your permission, may I make a clarification with regards to a supplementary question posed by the Leader of the Opposition on the 3 March Sitting?”
“Sir, I thank Mr Yip for his supplementary question. I think there is a need to strike a balance here: a balance between ensuring accountability because it is public money that we are dealing with, but perhaps a more important point is the need for us to check in on a regular basis with these clients. Because we do want to make sure that circumstances within the family have not quite deteriorated and if they have or if they have improved, what are the additional things that we can do to better support these clients. So, considering the two, I think there is a need for us to still ensure that this renewal process is in place. But for cases where, based on their own merits, we can extend the interval for which each of this renewal is being carried out.”
“Sir, the point-to-point (P2P) transport sector has evolved significantly in recent years. Commuting in private hire cars (PHCs) has become an integral part of our local transport mix. While many Singaporeans have embraced PHCs as a commute modality, the fact that PHCs are not allowed to pick-up and drop-off passengers at taxi stands runs counter to common sense. Why not allow the use of available infrastructure to facilitate safe pick-up and drop-off for PHC users? From both the convenience and safety standpoints, doing so makes good sense. While I agree with the need to restrict vehicles other than taxis from stopping or parking, I urge LTA and MOT to reconsider allowing PHCs to pick-up and drop-off passengers at taxi stands and stops. 2.45 pm Sustainable P2P Transport Services”
“Sir, as Singapore pivots toward active mobility in our last-mile commute, ensuring the safety of shared footpaths, especially for our seniors and young ones, is crucial. The continued occurrence of incidents, such as the fatal collision between a 20-year-old e-scooter rider and an elderly woman in Bedok North last year, has kept the issue of pathway safety on the public’s consciousness. In 2018, LTA mandated that new pathways are to be at least 1.8 metres wide, up from 1.5 metres previously. However, I wonder if this provision is sufficient. In Queenstown, many residents are seniors. Walking from point-to-point is a daily reality for many of them. In Margaret Drive, for instance, owing to an adjacent construction, one particular shared pathway is now a mere 1.62 metres. In this instance, I propose widening the shared pathway for the duration of the adjacent construction, by temporarily concretising an adjacent grass strip, measuring 0.45 metres in width. As Singapore society ages, and as we evolve how we complete our last-mile commute, I hope our provisions can spare a thought for the safety of the vulnerable ones in our community. Personal Mobility Aids (PMAs)”
“We collect and analyse data regularly to implement strategies that help control and reduce the problem in each precinct. A municipal task force convenes regularly and reducing rat burrows is a standing agenda item. This structured approach helps us assess the effectiveness of measures taken and adjust our approaches for better outcomes. However, the financial challenges of running the Town Council remain high, with significant resources already allocated to pest control efforts. While traditional methods, such as baiting and manual trapping provide some level of control, they may not be sufficient for long-term effectiveness. Given these challenges, there is a pressing need to explore more advanced and efficient rat control solutions. These modern techniques can possibly include the use of smart traps and biological controls, which have been proven to be more environmentally sustainable and effective as well. I therefore would like to appeal to the MSE to provide their assessment on the rat situation in Singapore and to review the possibility of assisting Town Councils defray costs associated with implementing the more innovative, albeit costlier pest-control solutions. With more support, we can embrace more effective and environmentally friendly methods, and at the same time, comprehensively nip the rat problem in the bud. Enablers”
“Madam, Project Wolbachia is presently in Phase 5 of its implementation. I fully support the project and its continued implementation. However, for some residents, especially those whose homes are on lower floors, living with the constant release of male Wolbachia mosquitoes has caused some inconveniences. While I usually share NEA's advisory that they do not have to exercise restraint in swatting mosquitoes they come across, few found solace in my advice. One resident with sensitive skin even purportedly developed rashes because of the increased mosquito population. To be sure, the NEA has reported laudable outcomes from the project thus far, Aedes mosquito population at study locations has dropped by up to 80% to 90% and findings from a multi-site field study revealed a 75% decrease in risks of contracting dengue. Residents in nearby areas have also been found to have a 45% lower risk of contracting dengue than those in areas without releases, indicating that the advantages go beyond immediate zones. Would the MSE and NEA then be able to help ameliorate the disamenities that residents face with the project's implementation? Rats Infestation Madam, rat sightings in Singapore are not uncommon. In Queenstown, residents have raised concerns regarding rodent problems in their estates. In a few particularly severe cases, rats have chewed through car wires, causing significant damage to vehicles, resulting in damages amounting to thousands of dollars in repair costs. Such incidents not only result in unnecessary financial burden for vehicle owners, but more importantly, highlight broader public hygiene, health and safety concerns. Working with the Town Council, my team and I actively monitor and work to reduce the number of rat burrows in our estate.”
“Madam, I am Hokkien, and Hokkien mee is one of my favourite hawker food. I recently ate my first plate of Hokkien mee that was not cooked by a human hawker. No, not a paranormal encounter. My Hokkien mee was cooked by a robot, named Wok AI. To my surprise, the Hokkien mee was delicious, just a touch lacking in "wok hei", something that even Chip, the engineer-turned-hawkerpreneur has been working on, and by now, he might already have "cracked the code" to achieve ideal "wok hei". Madam, my cut is not about "wok hei" but how technology can help us sustain our hawker culture. Technology can reduce the physical strain on senior hawkers, allowing them to focus on quality control. It could also ensure consistency in taste and consumers might even be able to personalise our dishes. Fancy a plate of Hokkien mee that is 20% spicy, 50% moist, 30% "wok hei", just 3% oily, for Healthier SG's sake? I therefore hope the Ministry can strengthen support for our hawkers in technology adoption, and in so doing, preserve our much beloved hawker culture for many more generations to come. Focus on Public Health and Hygiene”
“However, should these teething challenges be successfully worked through, such an arrangement would enable different hawkers to operate the same stall at different times of the day, thereby ensuring the continuity of food options for consumers and retaining the vibrancy of our hawker centres for a much longer stretch of the day. On a related note, many successful hawkers have built strong brand recognition, with many loyal customers seeking out their food. However, the inability to operate beyond two stalls restricts their ability to meet demand. Under today's provisions, hawkers can appoint a joint operator or a nominee. However, I understand that some hawkers are still hesitant about doing so. Could the Ministry share more from its engagement with hawkers the general reasons for not readily embracing the joint tenancy or nominee model, and what the NEA or MSE might be able to do to address these concerns? Regular reviews and recalibration of existing frameworks will ensure that hawker centres remain accessible, sustainable and adaptable to the evolving needs of hawkers and consumers alike. By fostering a more flexible and forward-looking approach, we can continue to uphold Singapore's rich hawker heritage while ensuring its long-term viability for future generations. Automation and Hawker Culture”
“Madam, hawker centres play a crucial role in Singapore's culinary and cultural landscape, serving as a cornerstone of our local food culture. Hawker centres provide affordable, good-quality meals and serve as communal spaces where people from all walks of life gather. Whenever I seek budget-friendly and delicious food, hawker centres are my go-to choice. However, while regulations governing our hawker centres today have generally served us well, I would like to ask the Ministry if some rethinking of our rules might be opportune, especially in view of the need to adapt to the changing realities confronting our hawkers today. A significant challenge among our hawkers today is their physical self. Many hawkers are getting on in years and are not as physically able as before. Many veteran hawkers, who have spent decades perfecting their craft, now find it increasingly difficult to work long hours. As a result, many stalls in some hawker centres close by the late afternoon, and this translates to reduced food options and overall foot traffic to these hawker centres. This not only impacts individual stallholders' revenue but also affects the vibrancy and appeal of these centres as our community hubs. To optimise stall utilisation and address this challenge, may I suggest that MSE consider the implementation of a new policy that would allow for two different sets of stallholders to operate the same stall, in accordance with a two-shift system. To be sure, this calls for careful planning: food types sold across the two shifts should ideally be complementary; and infrastructural provisions such as allocated storage areas or spaces for the preparation of food must be redesigned.”
“However, bins sometimes overflow before scheduled collections, forcing recyclables to be discarded as trash to maintain cleanliness. Singapore's recycling trucks also lack multiple compartments to keep materials separated. Even if households sort their recyclables, they would still be mixed during collection. This raises concerns about the effectiveness of the system and begs the question of whether additional investments can and should be made in upgrading infrastructure to support better recycling practices. What else can the Ministry do to facilitate Singaporeans in truly embracing the 3Rs as a way of life? Free or Low-cost Drinking Water”
“Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. This has been a mantra that has been ingrained in me from a young age. In my younger days, I had thought that the 3Rs was the gold standard for sustainable living. That misinformed fantasy of mine was smashed when I visited one of Singaporeans' favourite travel destinations: Japan. In Japan, recycling is a ritual. Japanese families meticulously sort their waste into plastic, paper, metal and glass. They follow detailed and stringent guidelines. To recycle a soft drink container, one would have to clean and dry the PET bottle to prevent residual contamination, remove paper labels and metal cap, and deposit each item in different recycling bins. Such societal norms have its roots in a worldview that is a deeply reverent of Mother Nature, something Japanese children learn from a young age. In Singapore, our National Recycling Programme aims to make recycling more convenient, but we do face several challenges. Our Blue Bins are a single-stream system where all recyclables are collected. While this simplifies the process, contamination is a problem, when non-recyclables or items that have yet to be cleaned get thrown in the mix, especially. In fact, contamination rate stands at 40%, significantly diminishing the effectiveness of our recycling system. Some Queenstown residents have also expressed concerns about the limited capacity of recycling bins and the low frequency of collection. In HDB estates, 660-litre bins are used; one bin to each block. Collections take place at least three times a week. Larger 1,800-litre or 2,200-litre side-loader bins are also deployed but collections only happen once a week. For landed properties, each house is provided with a recycling bin, typically ranging from 180 to 240 litres, with weekly collection services.”
“Sir, I thank the Member for his additional questions. We will clarify during the Committee of Supply debates.”
“Sir, I thank the Leader of the Opposition for his additional questions on SSO-town specific data. We do not publish that. We track the statistics at the national level. As to why we do not publish that, I think that there are some variabilities across towns, for instance, based on the demographic growth profiles of each town's population, there might be some differences in terms of those who qualify for LTA vis-a-vis those who qualify for SMTA for instance. But generally, we do not see a large standard deviation across towns with regard to those who qualify for SMTA and LTA. As to the second supplementary question, I would encourage the Member to file another Parliamentary Question, because I do not have the statistics with me at this moment.”
“Sir, the example that I mentioned earlier, in response to the Member's supplementary question is that we have worked with Keppel Club to provide or set aside a majority of slots for the public and to also keep costs affordable for these members of the public. Rest assured, we will continue to work hard to ensure continued public access to golf.”
“Sir, I thank the Member for her supplementary questions and more importantly, for standing with and supporting our social service frontliners. As I mentioned, consistent reporting is probably the best response to any social service professional who encounters a threat, verbal or physical abuse, or harassment. So, report it to the Police. And after the report has been lodged, MSF will appoint a dedicated officer to serve as a point of contact on behalf of the social service worker with the Police. And even if the case is assessed to have not crossed the line or threshold for proactive investigation, MSF may guide and advise the social service worker to pursue civil remedies in the form of a Magistrate's Complaint, if it is necessary. We will consider the Member's suggestion on public education on measures that MSF can take to protect social service professionals. Like Ms Yeo, MSF does not tolerate any abuse of our social service frontliners and if there are specific cases that the Member has in mind for which MSF can assist with, we would be happy to follow up with her separately.”
“Sir, I thank Mr Giam for his supplementary questions. With regard to the temporary venue, as I had mentioned earlier, we are already looking into the possible extension of the use of that facility for competitions, training and public use beyond WCH. The temporary venue actually sits on the footprint of the Kallang Alive masterplan. More fine grain details of the masterplan are currently being worked through. Various agencies like Sport Singapore, the Urban Redevelopment Authority for instance, will have to consider the various use cases of the plot for the mid to longer term. Definitely, we will be considering whether we can extend the use of the venue beyond its WCH utility. On his second question about cost, I think a common stance amongst organisers of such international, global sporting events, us included, will be not to be more excessive than past editions of the same event. After considering sponsorships that we have garnered so far, I think it is reasonable for us to make a stand that we are more or less on track with this position.”
“More details will be shared later as these require additional feasibility studies. The construction cost of the temporary facility is being finalised, but it is expected to be comparable to that of other host cities which built temporary facilities to host the WCH. As host country, we aim to deliver a positive event experience for athletes and spectators alike, while being fiscally prudent and cost-effective. The organising committee has been careful to reduce costs where possible, while working hard to secure sponsorships for these events. These sponsorships will help us defray some costs associated with operations and logistics of the event. We have a sponsorship target and we are making good progress towards it. We are in active discussions with various sponsors and we will reveal them progressively. At this point of time, we are unable to disclose details of the sponsorships due to commercial sensitivity. The success of this event will depend on Singaporeans’ support. So, let us cherish this opportunity to show the world what we can do as a nation united and deliver a championships that we can and will be proud of.”
“Some of these community activities will be commencing soon in the lead-up to the main event, such as the SG60 Swim Challenge that we will launch in April this year. We expect to welcome about 40,000 international visitors to Singapore for the World Aquatics and World Aquatics Masters Championships 2025. This is a conservative estimate and comprises spectators and other visitors such as athletes, officials, production crew, media. Based on this, the estimated incremental tourism receipts generated by these international visitors is estimated to be some $60 million. The final tourism receipts generated will be clearer after the event. For us to be able to host any large-scale sport competitions of the highest tier, we would have to put in place additional supporting infrastructure, as was the case for previous host cities of the WCH. For instance, the recent editions of WCH in Fukuoka and Doha required the construction of temporary pools to facilitate the hosting of the events at WCH, and coordination across the different aquatic events for officials, athletes and fans. For WCH 2025, with the OCBC Aquatic Centre hosting water polo and diving competitions, a temporary facility will be needed to host the swimming and artistic swimming competitions. And this is being constructed at Kallang. Besides using the facility for the WCH, it will also be used for the World Aquatics Masters Championships that would be held from 26 July to 22 August this year. We are also studying the possible extension of the temporary facility to be used as a training and competition venue for other local and regional meets, as well as for athlete training and for public use, beyond the hosting of the WCH. If possible, this would further amortise the cost of staging the WCH.”
“Thank you, Sir. The World Aquatics Championships (WCH) is the highest tier of world championships in aquatics. WCH 2025 will be the first time that an edition of the WCH is being held in Southeast Asia. Global sports events such as WCH help Singapore to gain sporting prominence and mindshare internationally. As of January this year, our social media content on WCH 2025 has made more than 5.8 million impressions, across various platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Tiktok, Weibo and XiaoHongShu. WCH strengthens Singapore’s reputation as a top-tier destination for international sporting events and reinforces our capabilities in hosting such large-scale events. Beyond sports, the event will also have a related impact on tourism, hospitality and other industries, further raising Singapore’s profile as a travel destination. The WCH 2025 will inspire local athletes and further encourage our population at large to participate in sports. Our Team Singapore athletes can gain valuable experience from competing against the best athletes in the world and this in turn will bolster their chances of doing well at future tournaments. Such opportunities to compete with the world’s best are significantly enhanced when world class competitions are held right here in Singapore. The WCH is not just for athletes but also for all Singaporeans. The event will rally Singaporeans together to cheer for Team Singapore in SG60, and we are confident that it will spark greater interest amongst Singaporeans for aquatic sports and inspire our next generation of sporting talents. Singaporeans can look forward to a variety of related community activities organised at the sidelines of the main event. We expect up to 350,000 Singaporeans will have the opportunity to participate in these activities.”
“Concerns over physical and mental well-being also mean many are hesitant to re-enter or stay on in the workforce in their senior years. Clearly, mindset shifts and tangible action, on both the employer and employee ends of the spectrum, are needed. If we are serious about our Blue Zone 3.0 ambition, then surely, we must lead the charge in reframing retirement and senior employment, among other issues. After all, to discriminate based on age, is merely the act of discriminating against our very selves – the future versions of ourselves. Sir, Singapore's journey to becoming a Blue Zone is unlike any others. As we strive towards being a Blue Zone 3.0, our goal is not just to live longer but to live well. And to get there, we will be sailing through uncharted waters, where no one before us has gone. Our true measure of success lies not just in productivity, but in the collective well-being of every passenger on board this ship. Beyond the various measures like the Matched MediSave Scheme, the enhanced Home Caregiving Grants and broadening of HDB's Enhancement for Active Seniors programme under this Budget, there is scope for us to do more, to move the needle on senior employment. After all, if there is any vessel that we can navigate all on board to the promised land of wholesome, empowered longevity, I have every confidence that that vessel's name must be Singapore. Sir, I support the Budget.”
“At retirement age – which in Singapore's context will be 64 by 2026 – many seniors whom I meet are still physically active, cognitively sharp and more than able to be involved in a productive activity, one way or another. In fact, I jokingly tell many of my Queenstown seniors that I meet that I would have to "check their IC" to be sure that they are telling me their real age! Many of them look way younger than their actual "NRIC age". To be sure, many seniors find purpose, mental stimulation and social engagement in continued employment. Work is more than just an income source. It provides structure, a sense of purpose and a continued role in society. Some seniors actively resist retirement because their professions define their identity. The challenge, then, is not merely extending work life but rethinking its structure. How can employment be made more flexible, more meaningful and adapted to the strengths of an ageing workforce? Also, what is the reality in our employment market today? Do employers perceive the resumes of senior applicants they receive as prospective assets with decades of experience, or do they reflexively dismiss them on the assumption that senior workers would be a drag on efficiency and productivity? What changes can be implemented at the workplace to facilitate the reintegration of more seniors as part of our active workforce? Would employers be willing to consider process automation, AI, redesigning full-time roles as micro jobs as ways to not merely hire more seniors, but also, to fulfil our manpower needs in a labour-tight market? Among senior workers, many are rightly concerned about the perception of age discrimination at the workplace and many would also want to prioritise time for loved ones in their golden years.”
“I have been concerned about various aspects about our seniors in the community: their physical and mental well-being, their retirement financial adequacy, social isolation and the many associated downsides. As our population ages, we must rethink senior employment in our society. Should retirement mean stepping aside completely, or can we reimagine a model where their experience and contributions continue to shape our community in a positive manner? How should we think about productivity, employment and social participation in our senior years? For some insights, let us go back in time. For much of human history, retirement was not a formalised concept. People worked for as long as they were able to, and labour formed an integral part of an individual's identity. In 1889, Germany introduced the world's first pension system: giving Germans who were 70 years and older, especially those who could no longer work, financial security in their old age. Now, the rest, from the late 19th century onwards, was history. An official retirement policy is arguably one of the best policy implementations that bolsters well-being in one's senior years. Over time, however, attitudes towards retirement evolved. As people generally live longer, there is a growing sense of inertia in extending our working years. Take France, for example. In 2023, France experienced widespread protests raising the retirement age from 62 to 64. Some see the raising of retirement age as an obscene violation of their well-deserved rest after years of toil. The real question is though: does employment in our senior years have to be cast purely as a binary, black-or-white construct: either you work full-time or you do not work at all?”
“We can almost see and hear the Health Promotion Board's various campaigns flashing before our eyes. Cognitive engagement – learning new skills, playing memory-enhancing games, engaging in purposeful activities reduce dementia risks, and from my own non-clinical experience, senior members of my extended family who played mahjong remained lucid throughout their golden years. Employment – continuing to work provides mental stimulation, encourages social interaction, adds to financial stability, facilitates a sense of validation, esteem and actualisation, all of which contribute to overall well-being. Our ambition for Singapore goes beyond what we had already achieved. In the words of our Health Minister, we are setting our sights to becoming a Blue Zone 3.0, moving beyond policy-driven longevity, to embedding healthier habits into everyday living. By 2030, one in four in Singaporeans will be 65 or older. As Singapore ages, it is essential to reframe the ageing narrative. Negative descriptors that are often used today, like "Silver Tsunami", "has beens", "burden on society" should be immediately abandoned. And we must shift our perception of ageing. No longer should ageing be seen as a period of decline, but rather as a phase of life that represents opportunity, contribution and vitality. By fostering a society that not only values longevity, but also the potential and contributory role that seniors can play, we can create an ecosystem where older adults are empowered to contribute and to thrive. In Queenstown where I serve, nearly three in 10 residents are 60 and above.”
“A significant 10-year gap between health span and lifespan exists. What this means is that Singaporeans spend the last decade of their lives in poor health, struggling with chronic illnesses, disabilities, or other age-related illnesses and issues. While Singapore has a high life expectancy, health difficulties have a substantial impact on quality of life in our later years. How then, can we address this? The answer does not lie in what we can do when we turn 60. We do need to go way upstream. Let us examine the factors determining good health. According to the World Health Organisation, factors affecting one’s health are an individual’s social and economic environment, physical environment and their characteristics and behaviours. It is not merely how good or advanced a population’s healthcare system is that singularly determines the people’s healthcare outcomes. In fact, social determinants of health play a much more significant role in ageing well than the state of the healthcare system alone. Therefore, a comprehensive approach to ageing well must consider various non-healthcare and non-medical components such as social connections, physical activity, dietary habits, cognitive engagement and employment. Social connections – strong community ties significantly support ageing well. Conversely, research suggests that social isolation contributes to cognitive decline and poor health outcomes. Physical activity – encouraging daily movement, natural movement, such as gardening or walking, rather than structured workouts, helps maintain long-term mobility and independence. Dietary habits – this is an obvious one, for we are what we eat. Consume in moderation. Less salt, less sugar.”
“Sir, some parts of the world are home to an unusually high number of centenarians, individuals who live past 100. These communities also often have a high quality of life. Enter the “Blue Zone", a term coined by explorer, author and longevity researcher Dan Buettner in 2004, as part of a study that examined longevity hotspots around the world. Among these pioneering Blue Zones were: Okinawa, Japan; Sardinia, Italy; Loma Linda, California; Nicoya, Costa Rica and Ikaria, Greece. These regions share common lifestyle habits such as plant-based diets, frequent low-intensity physical activity, strong community ties and a sense of purpose. Singapore was declared a Blue Zone 2.0 in August 2023. This was an accolade significant for reasons beyond the longevity marker that Blue Zones represents. Unlike first generation Blue Zones like Okinawa, Singapore does not boast of a deep-rooted tradition of healthy living. Our pace of life is fast and often hectic, and not getting enough good quality sleep is something many in Singapore as well as in this Chamber, struggle with. Yet, Singapore bucks the trend, becoming a Blue Zone mainly because of stable governance, economic security, accessible healthcare and effective public health measures. So, in essence, being a Blue Zone was not something that came along organically for Singapore, but rather, through careful orchestration via policy and programming. Indeed, we are living longer here in Singapore than many other parts of the world. Singaporeans have an average life expectancy of 84.3 years, with men having an average life span of 84 years, while women living to an average of 88 years. Does that mean then that all is well? Not quite. The health span of Singaporeans, that is, years lived in good health is at 74.2 years.”
“Sir, actually, there is a concerted and coordinated plan as recommended by the Enabling Master Plan Task Force for promoting inclusive employment practices. Some of the key components of our strategies to raise the bar in inclusive employment include: one, harvesting the potential for more inclusive hires in six identified growth sectors by enhancing support for employers in companies in these sectors, including putting in place inclusive hiring champions; two, improving opportunities for PwDs in gig work; and three, uplifting the capabilities of our job coaches. But to the Member's suggestion, we are prepared to look at what the Enabling Business Hub is currently doing, working with the hawkers' associations, as well as the local community, local heartlands, business owners, and scale what has been done, where appropriate.”
“Sir, I thank the Member for his supplementary questions. I will take them together. Sir, the Member is right to describe the process of extending financial assistance as a process of balance – a balance essentially between getting the most appropriate financial assistance, in terms of quantum, to an applicant based on his or her assessed need in the most expedient manner. And on the other end, maintaining a healthy level of prudence and at the same time, accountability, because public funds are being used. Our officers at the frontline, at the SSOs are well aware that, over time, the applicants' financial situation might change and therefore, will check in periodically with each applicant over time; and at the same time, ensuring that the principles of expedience and accountability are upheld. I am confident that our public officers at the SSOs do the best for each application that they receive, based on these principles.”
“In 2024, the COC granted a total of 71 permits for organisations to conduct fundraising appeals for foreign charitable purposes.”
“In 2014, the COC granted a total of 71 permits for organisations to conduct fundraising appeals for foreign charitable purposes. [Please refer to "Helping our Charities Make a Global Impact", Official Report, 5 February 2025, Vol 95, Issue 151, Matter raised on Adjournment Motion section.] [(proc text) Written statement by Mr Eric Chua circulated with leave of the Speaker in accordance with Standing Order No 29(5): (proc text)] I wish to make the following factual correction in my response to the Adjournment Motion during the Sitting of 5 February 2025. My statement should read as follows:”
“I think to clarify what I have just said, Mr Speaker, I think that what I have mentioned in my speech earlier was that specific instances, especially in the case that the Member has mentioned in his speech, that of Yuan Siang and the Monolith's application, it was the first time that the team has actually put in an application and the Charities Unit team had to go through back and forth, with some hand-holding guidance, especially with regard to checks, background checks, that had to be made to maintain public trust and confidence in the entire fundraising process, to make sure that donors' interests are protected and to make sure that donors are confident that this is a legitimate cause that they are donating towards. So, I think that is the angle for which I was coming from when I said that there were certain cases for which the process might be longer, not necessarily only higher risk cases. [(proc text) Question put, and agreed to. (proc text)] [(proc text) Resolved, "That Parliament do now adjourn." (proc text)] Adjourned accordingly at 8.39 pm.”
“Mr Speaker, I mentioned that the Minister, today, already has the discretion to waive the condition and has done so in the past. Many actually are qualifying as grantmakers, and they have applied for and have been successfully approved for charity status under the Grantmaker Scheme. Under this lighter touch regime, the key is that most, if not all, of the funds that are actually rallied or that are mobilised are private funds. So, in that sense, if you are going out to the public for appeals, you are going out to canvass on social media in the open for funds coming into a specific cause, then you do not qualify to be a part of this scheme. But I think, the short answer to Mr Louis Ng's question is that, yes, if you are canvassing for refugees overseas, you are not excluded from this exclusion.”
“Relevant considerations include the target amount of donations, mode of fundraising appeals, location and background of the beneficiaries, track record of the fundraisers and compliance with the past appeals, just to name a few. Nevertheless, we understand the pressing nature of permit applications for certain types of fundraising appeals, such as for those in support of disasters or other emergencies. Hence, the COC's Office takes a risk-based approach in assessing such applications and has been expediting most of these applications. To streamline the process of applying for foreign fundraising permits, we encourage NPOs to engage and alert us on their fundraising plans early and submit permit applications with full disclosure and complete information to facilitate each review. Alternatively, NPOs may also choose to work with other charities or organisations that already have valid permits to support the relevant causes. NPOs will not need to apply for a separate permit if they do so. We are always looking for ways to assist legitimate fundraisers in their charitable activities and welcome suggestions to improve our service delivery.”
“Most of these charities are Qualifying Grantmakers who applied for charity status under the Grantmaker Scheme administered by MCCY. Unlike typical charities, Qualifying Grantmakers are solely funded by an individual, family or institution and do not solicit for donations from the public. Given that these Qualifying Grantmakers are privately funded, they are regulated under a lighter-touch regime, with certain regulatory requirements, such as the requirement to substantially benefit the local community, waived. That said, Qualifying Grantmakers are still encouraged to apply some of their funds in Singapore. The key then, is in striking a balance: a balance between allowing selected charities more flexibility to do overseas work and yet ensuring that the vast majority of our charities which are funded by donations from the public retain the focus on meeting local needs. Mr Ng also spoke about the difficulties faced by NPOs in obtaining a permit to conduct fundraising appeals for foreign charitable purposes, such as the long processing time. We appreciate the understanding shared by Mr Ng on the need for due diligence on such fundraising appeals. The permit system and checks in place today serve to maintain public trust and confidence in fundraising appeals and protect donor interests. The COC's Office assesses the information provided by permit applicants to ensure that funds raised are used to support legitimate causes. In the past three years, we have been able to process most applications within 30 days. However, some applications may need longer to process as they are more complex and involve higher risks.”
“Mr Speaker, I thank Mr Louis Ng for his passionate speech about the admirable efforts of fellow Singaporeans who have stepped up to help those in need overseas. His suggestions on how to encourage and facilitate their work reflect our underlying shared vision of a united people where we look out for one another and support those in need, at home or abroad. I would like to address Mr Ng's suggestions by sharing our policy approach in balancing the needs and concerns of people in Singapore versus people outside of Singapore. Mr Ng spoke about the difficulties faced by non-profit organisations (NPOs) serving foreign charitable purposes in obtaining registered charity status in Singapore. As Mr Ng rightly pointed out, one of the conditions for charity registration is that the purposes of the organisation must be beneficial wholly or substantially to the community in Singapore. Registered charities enjoy benefits such as income and property tax exemption and therefore, there is an expectation that the resources of charities should generally be channelled back towards helping the local community. However, our regulatory framework is not so rigid that we are unable to work towards being a philanthropic hub and to recognise the benefits of our local charities in doing overseas charitable work. In line with Mr Ng's recommendation, the Minister today already has the discretion under the existing regulations to waive this condition on a case-by-case basis and has done so in the past. In response to the Member's Parliamentary Question on a related topic last year, we shared that the Commissioner of Charities (COC) has granted charity status to organisations who obtained a waiver of this charity registration condition.”
“Sir, with respect to the Member's supplementary question, I think there is no one answer because every case is unique by its own merits. Those of us who are involved in this piece of work would know that the situational factors and difficulties that each homeless or rough-sleeping person has to deal with are often complex and interlocking. It could be a mix of employment, family disputes, mental health – and a whole host of other issues. And oftentimes, they overlap with one another. So, what we need to do then is to make sure that we can work with community groups, work with individual volunteers on the ground, Government agencies in the mix as well, to offer the most thoughtful as well as customised support to each of these cases. So, really, there is no one quick, textbook answer for all the cases. 12.31 pm”
“Sir, I thank Assoc Prof Razwana for her supplementary questions. I will take the two questions together. Every foster child is issued a medical fee exemption card (MFEC) and this covers standard medical or dental treatment charges as well as compulsory immunisations and medications. So, in terms of getting access to these standard treatments and medication, I do not think the natural parents will be an obstacle to the process. What happens in every foster placement is that there will be a foster care worker that is assigned to support both the foster parents as well as the foster child, and they will have at least one face-to-face contact every two months. Every foster parent can raise any concerns or difficulties that they face during these sessions. What we can do is that we can continually engage foster parents. Every once in a while, I will also get feedback from foster parents as to how we can improve the process to help facilitate their work in taking care of the foster child. We will continue this engagement and make sure that, wherever support is required, we will render them as soon as possible.”
“Sir, ECDA, as noted by Ms Yeo, has informed all preschools of the mandate in a Town Hall in February last year. ECDA then issued a circular with details of the implementation in August last year, stating that all preschools must implement CCTVs from 1 July this year. This includes details of CCTV camera requirements, locations of where CCTV cameras must be installed, recording and storage of CCTV camera footage as well as usage and access of CCTV footage by parents and authorities. ECDA has provided lead time of over a year before the start of the mandate on 1 July this year. Additionally, I would like to inform the House that ECDA will also adopt an advisory approach for the first six months of implementation from 1 July this year to 31 December this year and enforcement will take place from 1 January 2025 onwards. This advisory approach was communicated to preschools in August last year. 1.30 pm”
“Mr Speaker, I thank Assoc Prof Razwana for her supplementary questions. I think the principle is that practice must be informed by research. And in the study, there were some 11 forms of ACEs that were identified. Let me highlight some archetypes for which MSF is working with ground organisations to address some of these concerns. For children who have experienced abuse or neglect, MSF works with community partners and agencies to provide evidence-based trauma interventions to address the trauma as well as other behavioural and emotional needs to help them develop healthy coping mechanisms. In terms of children who have lived with family members who are or were incarcerated, MSF works with the Singapore Prison Services on processes where social service touch points, for instance, the family service centres will be notified to provide support to family members of inmates or ex-offenders. For children whose parents are separating or divorcing, MSF has also partnered social service agencies to support these children and their parents, and this include the mandatory co-parenting programme, which helps parents make informed decisions that prioritise their child's well-being as well as to practise cooperative parenting. There are also other programmes to help children cope with their parents' divorce, such as the Children of Divorce Intervention Programme and the Children-in-Between Programme. So, these are the some of the archetypes that I have mentioned for which the Ministry is working closely with partners on the ground and as and when we can, we will have research inform some of the interventions that we are making and to assess the intervention's effectiveness on the ground as well.”