Hany Soh
Singapore
“Thank you, Speaker. Just one supplementary question on whether there are any recycling plans in the pipeline for collaborations with our partners in the region or globally, or for a start, coming up with a common framework in terms of recycling across our Association of Southeast Asian Nations region?”
“I thank the Minister of State for her response. I understand from a few seniors whom I have interacted with in Woodgrove recently that a number of their peers were unable to join them for their regular outdoor qigong and brisk walking activities due to respiratory-related health conditions lately.”
“In this regard, perhaps PUB could consider an "opt-in", at least for the implementation or installation of the Costal Protection Measures for private owners or lessors instead of requiring them to procure the same from scratch.”
“Thank you, Chairman. I have two clarifications. One is pertaining to what Senior Minister of State Janil has shared about MySkillsFuture Portal, revamping it. Can we explore to actually allow the functions for the users to actually navigate through the portal based on locations wise, so that it allows the users to benefit from it.”
“To encourage more Singaporeans to utilise their SkillsFuture training credits, I hope that SkillsFuture@PA programme can be further expanded. In addition to CCs, it could also extend to running courses at the Residents' Network Centres.”
“The first question is, can we explore rather than to not totally include or consider the waiver of fees, instead can we explore increasing the search fees instead, so as to achieve the objectives that Senior Parliamentary Secretary had mentioned in terms of defraying the fees for maintaining such a services in the Wills Registry?”
The complete record
Every one of 366 lines we hold for Hany Soh, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 1 of 8.
“Thank you, Speaker. Just one supplementary question on whether there are any recycling plans in the pipeline for collaborations with our partners in the region or globally, or for a start, coming up with a common framework in terms of recycling across our Association of Southeast Asian Nations region?”
“I thank the Minister of State for her response. I understand from a few seniors whom I have interacted with in Woodgrove recently that a number of their peers were unable to join them for their regular outdoor qigong and brisk walking activities due to respiratory-related health conditions lately. In this regard, I wish to ask, has the Ministry noticed that seniors have been particularly more prone to exacerbations of respiratory conditions during the haze period lately, given their higher vulnerability to air pollutants? Also, how can initiatives, such as the Community Health Posts, which are intended to bring healthcare closer to residents, especially our seniors, be further enhanced to better support them during the haze periods? Some examples which I wish to recommend are through proactive respiratory health monitoring, targeted education on haze precautions, expanded onsite support services or integrating with telehealth and frailty screenings at the Community Health Posts.”
“In this regard, perhaps PUB could consider an "opt-in", at least for the implementation or installation of the Costal Protection Measures for private owners or lessors instead of requiring them to procure the same from scratch. Thirdly, in the 10-year period for private owners and lessors to plan and implement Coastal Protection Measures, will they be required to provide progress updates to PUB? If so, how does PUB intend to ensure that the responsibility does not fall through the cracks when there is a transition in ownership or occupation by a lessor? Lastly, speaking from the perspective of conveyancing lawyer, how does the agencies ensure that the requirements are accurately reflected during the legal requisition stage? Notwithstanding my clarifications, I stand in support of this Bill.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, according to Singapore's Third National Climate Change Study, and just as what Minister Grace Fu has shared with this House earlier, Singapore's mean sea level may rise up to 1.1 metre by end-century, higher than previous estimates of one metre. Coastal protection measures will only become increasingly relevant and critical. To me, the purport of this Bill hits the nail on the head. However, the devil is in the details. I therefore raise several clarifications to the Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment. Firstly, the Government and Statutory Boards currently own approximately 70% of Singapore's coastal line, which leaves about 30% private-owned or leased. While PUB consulted a wide range of stakeholders for the purposes of our coastal protection plan, how extensive were its consultations with the roughly 30% of the private owners or lessors of our Singapore coastal line? These are the specific stakeholders whose concerns and feedback must be heard. For the practicality of this Bill's proposals and our coastal protection plan ought to be guided by the said group. This is not confined to the effectiveness of the Coastal Protection Measures but also and, perhaps, more importantly, the administrations of the Code of Practice and grants, which will all go towards the success or failure of the policy's objectives. Secondly, given that the Government will itself be implementing Coastal Protection Measures for the 70% of coastal line it owns, has PUB considered extending any economies of scale to be reaped to the private owners or lessors?”
“Thank you, Chairman. I have two clarifications. The first is in relation to the Beverage Container Return Scheme. I understand from Senior Minister of State Dr Janil's speech yesterday that the "Return Right" F&B outlets will be given a specific decal to inform consumers about their plans. In this regard, I wish to ask whether the decals have already been distributed to all of these stakeholders and are we looking at implementing it by 1 April as well? And to further avoid any confusion among the patrons in the F&B outlets, can we explore having a centralised compiled list of these vendors and perhaps put it on MyENV app? The second clarification is in relation to the SG Eco Fund. It is heartening to hear from the Minister that $50 million granted since November 2020 has engaged more than 700,000 people on sustainability related efforts. In this aspect, can I check whether we have also been keeping track in terms of the amount of the waste or energy and water resources that we have conserved through rolling out of this initiative through the SG Eco Funds? As I mentioned in my speech, it is important to actually measure to manage the outcomes.”
“By prioritising education, bolstering infrastructure and enhancing incentives, we can measure our progress and manage our resources wisely. Food Security, Resilience and Safety”
“This deposit-refund system for plastic and metal beverage containers, managed by BCRS Ltd, promises to boost recycling rates with a 10-cent refund per container returned at over 1,000 reverse vending machines island-wide at launch, aiming to double that within the first year. By making producers responsible and consumers active participants, it addresses waste at its source while improving recycling infrastructure. To ensure its success, can the Ministry provide more details on how the scheme will be operationalised, including management of unredeemed deposits and strategies to garner widespread support from Singaporeans through education campaigns and accessible return points? The BCRS may only be as successful with the public’s support. However, as we have heard the views of affected proprietors and feedback from consumers, the greatest challenge that needs to be overcome is in my opinion getting everybody on board. Finally, as we mark the sixth anniversary of the SG Eco Fund this year, launched in 2020 with $50 million to back community-driven sustainability projects, the fund has empowered numerous initiatives, from small-scale "Sprout" grants now permanently capped at $30,000 to larger endeavours. This milestone is a testament to ground-up action. Does the Ministry have plans to expand the fund's scope, perhaps by increasing overall funding, introducing new categories for climate adaptation, or partnering with more sectors to spur even greater participation across all segments of society? In closing, embracing a green sustainable lifestyle is not just about policies – it is about empowering every Singaporean to make a difference.”
“Introduced in mid-2023 at larger supermarkets, this initiative has already shown promising results, with at least large supermarket operators having reported a reduction in bag usage by up to 80%. This nudge has encouraged many to bring reusable bags, cutting down on plastic waste that clog our landfills and oceans. However, as we approach the three-year anniversary of the Disposable Carrier Bag Charge, I would like to ask the Ministry: what is the latest data on the scheme's overall effectiveness in reducing disposable bag consumption across Singapore? What lessons can we apply to broader waste reduction efforts? Second, regarding climate vouchers under the Climate Friendly Households Programme. This scheme has been a valuable tool, providing vouchers for energy and water efficient appliances, and it was recently enhanced with an additional $100, bringing the total to $400 per eligible household and extended to private properties until 31 December 2027. It is heartening to see such incentives making sustainable choices more accessible. Drawing inspiration from innovative local programmes like the Northwest Community Development Council’s (CDC's) Green Homes at Northwest, which rewards residents with up to $500 in e-vouchers for adopting eco-friendly practices such as using climate vouchers for high-efficiency appliances, I propose MSE considers how we can build on this momentum. Can the Ministry share whether the climate vouchers scheme will continue beyond 2027, or if a nationwide version akin to Green Homes at Northwest, perhaps with tiered rewards for multiple green actions, could be rolled out to amplify incentivisation and education across all districts in Singapore? Third, the upcoming Beverage Container Return Scheme (BCRS) set to launch on 1 April 2026.”
“Chairman, as we navigate the challenges of climate change, it is imperative that we, as a community, take collective action to build a more resilient and eco-conscious Singapore. Our efforts today are directed towards securing a livable environment for our future generations. Before Budget 2026, as part of our regular People's Action Party (PAP) Climate Action Group outreach engagements, my GPC Parliamentary colleagues, Ms Poh Li San, Mr David Hoe and I jointly organised an event based on the theme "Sustainability Living: Creating Zero Waste and a Circular Economy". It was a robust discussion session with over 30 climate activists, community leaders and stakeholders who came together to discover existing measures as well as new ways for us to foster sustainability in our daily lives. From the lively discussions and brainstorming, what we have gleaned is this: to convince Singaporeans to adopt green habits that minimise generation of waste, energy consumption, and water usage, three key pillars must undergird our efforts and policies. One, increasing education; two, improving infrastructure; and three, enhancing incentives. While sustainability is a global mission, the Singapore way has to be one that is “Made to Measure” and “Measure to Manage," for our unique urban context, with clear metrics to track progress and refine our approaches as we continue on this unceasing sustainability journey. We need targeted and a range of policies that would in aggregate resonate with and manage everyday Singaporeans. Against this backdrop, I raise several questions for MSE’s response today. First, on the effectiveness of the Disposable Carrier Bag Charge.”
“Thank you, Chairman. I have two clarifications. One is pertaining to what Senior Minister of State Janil has shared about MySkillsFuture Portal, revamping it. Can we explore to actually allow the functions for the users to actually navigate through the portal based on locations wise, so that it allows the users to benefit from it. This is aligned to my earlier cuts in relation to supporting people, for example, like stay home mothers, people with mobility issues to get closer to enhance and embrace lifelong learning. The second clarification is to the Minister. This is in relation to, also back to my cuts about exploring to have ITE or lifelong learning centre in the north. This is actually a very practical suggestion, especially since we have existing infrastructures available once the sports school moves out and moves to Kallang, so this is something that I really hope that MOE can consider.”
“To encourage more Singaporeans to utilise their SkillsFuture training credits, I hope that SkillsFuture@PA programme can be further expanded. In addition to CCs, it could also extend to running courses at the Residents' Network Centres. This would provide greater convenience and companionship for seniors and those with mobility issues, motivating them to sign up and participate. (In English): Chairman, educating Singaporeans develops our only natural resource – our people. Broadening education paths is not a luxury. It is essential for Singapore's resilient future. By expanding capacity, building targeted facilities, partnering with industries and community programmes, and reforming finances, we can make lifelong learning the norm, not the exception. Let us commit to this today, for the sake of our youths, our workers, our nation. ITE Pathways and Lifelong Learning”
“Such a facility would enhance access to practical, skills-based education, bridge gaps, and foster a stronger culture of continuous growth. Infrastructure alone is insufficient. We need holistic programmes to reach those who might otherwise fall through the cracks. I therefore call for deeper collaboration with initiatives such as the YMCA's Vocational and Soft Skills Programme, which equips out-of-school youth and youths-at-risk with job competencies and vocational skills to rebuild their confidence. Many of those young children feel lost due to negative peer influences or challenging family backgrounds. Normalising and expanding such programmes align closely with the Prime Minister's vision: every Singaporean, regardless of starting point, deserves a fair chance to pursue their aspirations and realise their full potential. To make these pathways truly inclusive, education financing must keep pace. I urge for a review and broadening of the Central Provident Fund Education Loan Scheme and Tuition Fee Loan to cover a wider range of courses – vocational trades, the arts and innovative fields like AI and sustainability. More banks should also offer similar support. This is an investment in our people's talents, ensuring no dream is deferred due to financial barriers. In Mandarin, please. (In Mandarin): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] To support the implementation of the SkillsFuture initiative, the People's Association (PA) has been offering SkillsFuture@PA courses at various Community Clubs (CCs) since 2016. This programme has been in place for nearly 10 years now. I would like to ask: has the number of courses offered, as well as the number of participating CCs, been gradually increasing? Which age group makes up the majority of participants?”
“Chairman, as Deputy Chairperson of the Education GPC, my colleagues and I remain fully committed to ensuring Singaporeans have access to education at every stage of life, including pathways beyond the conventional routes we have long accepted. As our nation intensifies efforts in AI education and promotes lifelong learning, we must ensure the right infrastructure supports every keen learner, regardless of their starting point. This is about building futures, not just acquiring knowledge. From feedback in my constituency in Woodgrove, during every ITE and Polytechnic application period, many qualified residents are disappointed when their preferred courses are oversubscribed, even when their results actually meet the cut-off. Can the Ministry share the current occupancy or utilisation rates for our ITEs, polytechnics, as well as their part-time courses? What plans exist to increase openings for working adults balancing careers and family as well? I urge a comprehensive review of capacity to ensure no qualified student is left on the sidelines. As one of the Members of Parliament for Marsiling-Yew Tee Group Representation Constituency (GRC), I have previously raised in this House the proposal for a new ITE in the North. This could double as a dedicated lifelong training centre to serve the growing population in the region. It could partner closely with Republic Polytechnic for a seamless "through-train" programme, allowing smooth progression from foundational to advanced skills. It could also collaborate with corporates in the nearby JTC industrial areas, enabling learners to apply skills directly on the job, secure employment upon graduation, or return easily for upskilling.”
“The first question is, can we explore rather than to not totally include or consider the waiver of fees, instead can we explore increasing the search fees instead, so as to achieve the objectives that Senior Parliamentary Secretary had mentioned in terms of defraying the fees for maintaining such a services in the Wills Registry?”
“Thank you, Chairman. I wish to first declare that I am a practicing lawyer, serving on the Law Society's pro bono practice committee, as well as our Pro Bono SG's community legal clinics committee. I have two clarifications for Senior Parliamentary Secretary Eric Chua. The first is in relation to his explanations that the registration fees for the Wills Registry cannot be waived at this juncture and the reason is because it is to defray the fees for maintaining such a service. In this regard, I wish to propose, can we consider instead that waiving the fees but instead increase the search fees component. Fundamentally, the reason is because we really want to enable the Wills Registry to become a reliable and accurate repository where we are able to know exactly how many wills are accurate registered and done in Singapore. The second suggestion or clarification is, to strengthen the comprehensive legacy planning, apart from the suggestions that I have made on Wills Registry and LPAs waivers, I wish to enquire whether can we also explore for the advanced medical directives, whether currently it is only allowed for the doctors to witness the signing of this legal instrument? Akin to the same principle for registrations of LPAs, can we also work with the Ministry of Health to explore for the lawyers to do a comprehensive legacy planning which allows them to also witness the signing of an Advance Medical Directive (AMD)?”
“Without registrations or mandatory professional indemnity insurance, vulnerable individuals risk relying on flawed advice with little recourse. Unscrupulous operators also risk tarnishing the reputation of our legal professions, which has upheld high standards for decades. It is our duty to protect Singaporeans from such risks and ensure legacy is both encouraged and safe. Improving Accessibility to Community Disputes Resolution Tribunals”
“Chairman, I declare that I am a practising lawyer and my areas of practice include estate matters. The Government's national legacy planning campaign is commendable, and we should build on this momentum to help even more Singaporeans plan ahead. A Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) protects a donor while alive but ends upon death. Then, a will is essential to legally express the testator's wishes. My first proposal is to waive the $50 registration fee and the $50 update fee for every will deposited with the Singapore Academy of Law's (SAL's) Wills Registry. This fee deters many, unlike the successful LPA fee waiver by the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) that drove higher uptake. Free registrations would encourage more deposits and transforming the Wills Registry into a reliable comprehensive database. Today, we lack accurate data on how many Singaporeans have made wills, or whether a found will is the latest one. A no fee system would address these gaps, just as the six-year LPA fee waiver did. Second, as we encourage more will making, we must also strengthen safeguards. Feedback from the lawyers and the public highlights concerning experiences with non-legal providers offering wills writing courses or services. I raised a Parliamentary Question in October on regulating such businesses. The Ministry replied that wills and probate courses are not restricted to lawyers, but non lawyers cannot give legal advice or perform solicitor services. Doing so risk criminal liability under the Legal Profession Act. Yet, can we fairly expect an average Singaporean to discern whether a course provider is rendering a legal advice or not.”
“Thank you, Chairman. I understand from Minister Indranee's speech that there will be a workgroup that will be formed to engage and to come up with some recommendations on how to boost our marriage and parenthood. In this regard, I wish to find out, do we have some specific timelines in mind on when the engagements will take place and eventually, some implementations of the suggestions? Bearing in mind that actually time is of the essence for us as we understand from the Deputy Prime Minister's speech that we will be doing a review in 2030, which is just a few years away from now. In the meantime, my suggestion is that we should emphasise and prioritise our resources towards those that, as Minister Indranee has mentioned, are actually keen to embrace marriage and parenthood, but at the same time are constrained by resources. So, in regard to the marriage component, I wish to ask whether the Government is keen to consider reviving the Social Development Network to encourage more opportunities for young Singaporeans to network and find future partners. And two, in relation to those couples that are keen to be a parent in terms of the suggestions that we have put forward earlier, and those that have been highlighted by Fertility Support Singapore, whether the Ministry of Health is already in a pipeline to roll out some of this support initiatives?”
“In closing, these refinements – better housing access, stronger fertility support and eased family-raising burdens – can help more Singaporeans realise their aspirations. Let us continue building a Singapore truly Made For Families. Reset Population for Resilience”
“SingHealth data shows roughly one in six couples experience infertility here. Through engagements with residents and Fertility Support Singapore, I have seen financial costs as the top stressor, sometimes forcing couples to abandon their journeys entirely. In this connection, I reiterate several proposals which, in my considered opinion, would establish the "right conditions" and constitute "more support" by the Government for aspiring parents. One, promote early and complimentary health screenings for fertility, potentially collaborating with the Registry of Marriages (ROM) and as part of the Healthier SG movement. Two, increased subsidies for assisted reproductive treatments (ART). Three, higher MediSave utilisation limits for ART, allowing treatments in private clinics to reduce long public hospital waits where time is critical. And four, Government co-funding for ART at private clinics, expanding MediSave withdrawals from three to six cycles, coverage for elective egg freezing, subsidised couple screenings and enhanced workplace support for fertility and family building. Third, on raising children. We must keep education and family expenses affordable. Offer greater flexibility in using Child Development Account funds for preschool-recommended enrichment lessons and field trips, for example. We must also continue to support continuous career progression for working parents, especially mothers, to ensure stable incomes amid rising costs for children and ageing parents. I urge reinstating working mother tax incentives, allowing mothers who increase their earnings to claim larger relief per child. This would motivate them to stay in or return to the workforce and pursue leadership roles when ready.”
“Singapore's marriages fell by 6.2% in 2025 compared to 2024 and this significant drop is projected to worsen Singapore's ultra-low TFR, which stood at 0.97 in 2024. The question is: why are Singaporeans deterred from marrying and having children? Last February, I moved a Motion in Parliament calling for continued review and updating of policies to better support families and the marriage and parenthood aspirations of Singaporeans. I endorsed a whole-of-society approach to build a Singapore Made For Families. Through my engagements, it is clear this is a multi-faceted issue requiring enhanced Government support across life stages. At the outset, couples must want to start a family and feel confident they can raise one. As I said during the Child Development Co-Savings (Amendment) Bill debate, prospective parents have unique concerns. The decision to marry and have children is deeply personal. While no policy can meet every individual need, we must raise the baseline support on several fronts. First, a home of their own with sufficient space remains a top concern. The Housing and Development Board (HDB) has ramped up Build-To-Order (BTO) supply to keep public housing accessible and affordable, yet I still receive many appeals from Woodgrove residents for help with BTO or Sale of Balance Flats. Despite multiple ballots, some couples never secure an opportunity. This becomes a major speed bump in their family journey. I suggest refining HDB priority schemes to consider applicants' existing living arrangements. Those facing ascertainable hardships, such as overcrowded households, family conflicts or past pregnancy loss, could receive an additional ballot chance. Second, more support is needed for couples facing conception difficulties.”
“Building on the momentum, I intend to speak during the Ministry of Law’s Committee of Supply (COS) to propose ways to enhance access and protection to encourage legacy planning. Mr Speaker, in conclusion, Budget 2026 lays a strong foundation but with these recommendations, we can make it even more inclusive. By supporting Singaporeans through youth, parenthood and seniority, we build a resilient nation where every season of life is one of opportunity and dignity. I support the Budget.”
“Many do not wish to burden their children, and seek to remain active and healthy. Grassroots organisations and Active Ageing Centres play complementary roles in this, supporting seniors with face-to-face interactions, helping them to embrace digitalisation, organising regular engagements to foster community bonds while keeping our seniors’ minds sharp and prevent physical frailty. A recent example is the Frailty Management Programme that was launched in Care Corner Active Ageing Centres in Woodgrove and Marsiling, with a comprehensive and tailored care plan and close monitoring to address our seniors’ physical, nutritional and social needs. Mr Speaker, the Government has been actively encouraging seniors, and in particular, Singaporeans to embark on legacy planning. But I believe more can be done to increase the take-up rates, especially among our seniors, such as: one, continuing to waive the Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) registration fees for Singaporeans; and two, considering a revamp of the Wills Registry, while ensuring users are properly advised by legal professionals and better protected. At this juncture, I wish to declare that I am a practising lawyer. As part of our PAP Senior Group initiatives, Woodgrove Branch has organised three sessions of pro bono LPA certification sessions last year serving our seniors in need. I am immensely grateful to our group of dedicated volunteers and lawyers, who have given many of my Woodgrove residents a peace of mind and more importantly, assisted them in completing their legacy plans. At Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC, we have more pro bono LPA certification sessions in the pipeline, which we hope our residents will sign up for and attend when the dates are announced. Please stay tuned.”
“Beyond conception, the journey after birth, subsumed under SG Made For Families, also influences decisions to start families. Concerns include accessible and affordable housing as well as mitigating career impacts for parents raising children. It is regrettable that not every need can be met as each family's circumstances are unique. That said, this House will strive to ensure that every Singaporean family is cared for. A common appeal from my Woodgrove residents is for housing that allows them to build true homes. Obstacles that my residents face include successfully balloting for a HDB flat, upgrading to a larger flat to accommodate their growing family, which for buyers of resale flats means needing to fork out at times significant cash to meet the cash-over-valuation component. As such, I hope that HDB can provide access to bigger HDB flats by granting priority as second timers to the Sale of Balance Flats for families with two or more children who wish to upgrade and live closer to or with their parents. For children’s education, we must keep expenses affordable by offering better flexibility in tapping on the Child Development Account (CDA) funds for preschool-recommended enrichment lessons and field trips, for example. We should also support continuous career progression for working parents, especially mothers, ensuring stable incomes to cover growing expenses for ageing parents and children. I urge reinstating the working mother tax incentives to allow mothers who earned more income each year to claim a larger amount of tax relief for each child, so as to motivate mothers to remain and/or return to the workforce when they feel ready to pursue leadership positions. Finally, let us not forget our seniors entering their golden years.”
“Through my engagements with fellow Singaporeans, in particular my Woodgrove residents and Fertility Support Singapore (FSS), I have been motivated to continue to spotlight support for assisted conception procedures. As Minister Indranee Rajah noted in her speech at FSS' "Fertility and Inclusion in the Workplace" forum, and I quote, "There are couples who wish to have children but have difficulties conceiving. The struggles they face are deeply personal, often invisible and sometimes painful." SingHealth statistics indicate that roughly one in six couples, about 17%, experience infertility in Singapore. For these couples who clearly wish to start families but face daunting hurdles, we can and must do more. FSS' community engagements reveal that financial costs are the top stressor, forcing some to abandon their fertility journey entirely. With two successive years of historically low TFR, Sir, the time to act is now. My fellow PAP Women's Wing MPs and I stand aligned with FSS' recommendations to propose several feasible solutions to create those "right conditions": one, promote early health screenings for fertility, potentially collaborating with the Registry of Marriages and as part of the Healthy SG movement; two, increased subsidies for assisted reproductive treatments (ART); three, raising the MediSave utilisation limit for ART and allowing treatments in private clinics to alleviate long waiting times in public hospitals where time is of the essence. Additionally, we recommend Government to co-fund for ART at private clinics, expanding MediSave withdrawals from three to six cycles, MediSave coverage for elective egg freezing, subsidised fertility screenings for couples and enhanced workplace support for fertility and family-building.”
“Such initiatives should not only be encouraged but normalised, aligning with the Prime Minister's vision in his Budget speech: that every Singaporean, regardless of where they start in life, should have a fair chance to pursue their aspirations and realise their full potential. As our nation ramps up efforts in artificial intelligence (AI) education and encourages lifelong learning, we must ensure that the right infrastructure is in place to support every keen learner. I have previously suggested in this House that we consider establishing another Institute of Technical Education (ITE) in the North. This new ITE could also serve as a dedicated campus for lifelong learning, collaborating closely with the nearby Republic Polytechnic and collaborate closely with the adjacent JTC industrial areas. Such a facility would democratise access to practical, skills-based education, bridging gaps and fostering a culture of continuous growth. Turning to marriage and parenthood, I applaud the Budget's recognition that families are the bedrock of society and the first line of support for every individual. Building on this geological metaphor, Budget 2026 should enhance support for family starting and building, much like the stratification of bedrock that provides enduring stability. Prospective parents face unique concerns and challenges; there is no silver bullet to improve our ever-low total fertility rate (TFR) overnight. The decision to marry and have children is deeply personal. The key question is: what are the "right conditions" that would help couples feel confident and ready to start a family?”
“Mr Speaker, I rise in support of Budget 2026. As the Head of Advocacy for the People's Action Party (PAP) Women's Wing's Seasons of Life, I am heartened by the Budget's emphasis on supporting Singaporeans through every stage of their journey – from youth to parenthood and into the golden years. Drawing from my engagements with residents in our Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC and various community partners and stakeholders, I wish to raise recommendations that build on this foundation, ensuring no one is left behind as we navigate life's seasons together. Let me begin with our youths and the imperative of education for lifelong learning. As the Deputy Chairperson of the Education Government Parliamentary Committee (GPC), my colleagues and I remain unwaveringly committed to ensuring access to education at all life stages. I fully agree with the Prime Minister that learning must extend beyond theory and translate into hands-on applications that empower individuals to thrive. An example which I wish to share with this House is the YMCA's Vocational and Soft Skills Programme (VASSP), an initiative I have proudly supported for the past few years which aims to equip out-of-school youths and youths-at-risk with job competency and specific vocational skills. I regularly attend their dialogue sessions, where I share my personal story: starting as a student in the Normal (Academic) stream, facing doubts about my future, yet finding the confidence to pursue a law degree and becoming who I am today. This programme is a vital effort to uplift youths who may feel disillusioned about their future due to influences like misguided peers or challenging family backgrounds.”
“I thank the Senior Minister of State for his reply. In this regard, I have two supplementary questions. One is pertaining to a recent feedback that I have received from my Woodgrove residents. In fact, it is about misdelivery or missing letters that they were supposed to receive, inviting their children to attend our Woodgrove's Edusave ceremony. This is a rather unfortunate incident and we wondered how does the Ministry of Digital Development and Information (MDDI) intend to ensure that there is continuous improvement to SingPost's services; bearing in mind, in the Senior Minister of State's earlier reply, it was mentioned that, indeed, some of the feedback has already been brought to the Ministry's attention. The second supplementary question is, can MDDI share about SingPost's QoS standards in comparison with other countries' services standards?”
“Speaker, it is rather unfortunate that we have experienced two incidents at the very early stage of the school reopening, where many of our little ones, especially the Primary 1 students have just entered schools, and the incidents happened in primary schools in this instance. I believe this has invariably caused some anxiety for parents, especially for those whose children have just entered primary schools for the very first time. In this regard, can I ask the Ministry, how has MOE worked with the schools to communicate updates to the parents and what has been the feedback received thus far in relation to the handling of these issues on the ground in the schools? The second supplementary question is whether, following from these incidents, we are ramping up our efforts in raising more awareness and encouraging our students to practise good personal hygiene?”
“I thank the Senior Minister of State for his reply. I have three supplementary questions in this regard. First, are the participation rates at the CGS Drive, or the CGS Day, to NEA's satisfaction? How can NEA further cultivate greater interest and involvement of our Singaporeans towards the objectives that we have set in relation to CGS? And finally, whether NEA can consider, as part of the annual celebrations at the CGS Day, to consider setting some targets or begin to start tracking in relation to how much carbon footprint reductions, energy waste efforts reductions we have been doing in the community? On the day itself, we can, then, present and share with fellow Singaporeans the powerfulness of the community coming together to do green and go green.”
“I thank the Senior Minister of State for his reply. I understand that the cost of prevailing food supply prices are currently not taken into consideration at this point in time, but whether moving forward, we can take this into consideration and consider working closely with the Ministry of Trade and Industry? While I understand that we want to ensure sufficient food supplies for food security purposes, we also want to take care of our merchants and hawkers in trying to mitigate their operating cost. And there has been feedback that there has been a sudden surge in some of the protein items, for example, like chicken, which, as a result, they are deliberating whether to transfer this cost to the consumers. As a result, it will invariably become a concern in terms of the cost of living.”
“Thank you, Speaker. I wish to first declare that I am a family law practitioner. I thank the Minister for his substantive reply, but I note that my Parliamentary Question No 16, the questions have not been addressed yet, specifically in relation to when was the deceased's father first being informed of the situation, and whether the Ministry will consider requiring the parents of an affected child to be informed by relevant agencies, and involve both parents in any safety plan, regardless of their marital status. The reason I ask this is, more often than not, in the situations of a potential child abuse case, the relevant stakeholders more often than not, tend to assume that the parent without the custody care and control should not be first informed, or any of the relevant information may not be revealed to him at the earliest instance, and there are situations or there are cases where in the event of parental alienation and child abuse cases, the parent that was affected by parental alienations will only know of the situations, being the last person in the situation.”
“Thank you, Speaker. The TALIS findings underscore our Singapore teaching profession as innovative and respected, yet burdened by the demands that could potentially erode long-term sustainability, particularly our early career educators. In this aspect, I have three supplementary questions for the Minister. First, do teachers appraisal and progression factor in non-teaching duties, such as projects and CCAs? The second supplementary question concerns whether the Ministry has sought teachers' feedback on the demands that they face from students' parents and whether the situation has improved with the introduction of the Parents Gateway communication platform, as shared by the Minister earlier? And finally, I am not sure if I caught it, in the various measures that the Minister shared earlier, in relation to supporting the young, budding teachers, whether we are prepared to consider to include a scheme like a mentorship between senior and more junior teachers, as a form of buddy system, encouraging and providing the necessary support and guidance to the young educators?”
“Yes, sure. So, on that point itself, whether the legacy portal can be able to be enhanced further, to serve this purpose in terms of the take-up rate. And finally, also, in relations to the take-up rate, the registration fee for Form One is currently free and waived until 31 March 2026. In view that we are now rolling out this additional measure of remote certifications, whether we can consider to extend the waiver.”
“I agree with the Senior Parliamentary Secretary and wish to commend the efforts that, over the years, community partners, for example, Pro Bono SG, the Community Development Councils have been rolling out in the community to organise law awareness talks, particularly targeting the minority groups as well, and we even have the Family Justice Courts rolling out community law awareness talks in the community as well over the years to increase such awareness. But at the same time, I can recognise that a lot of seniors, they understand that it is important to do a LPA, but perhaps this topic still remains as a morbid one. And in terms of doing a comprehensive legacy planning or estate planning, they may think that perhaps they can prioritise in doing the nominations for CPF first, but try to delay on the doing of a LPA and doing of a will. I can understand that over the years the Government has rolled out many initiatives, for example, the Legacy Portal. So, my suggestion is whether we can consider how we try and increase awareness or encouragements of the take-up rate of doing a comprehensive estate planning in this aspect, which means encouraging more to sign up through the Legacy Portals, how the legacy portal can help to —”
“Thank you, Speaker. I have three clarifications to MSF. First, I must declare that I am a practising lawyer in family law, who volunteers in the Law Society's Probate Practice Committee. The first question is pertaining to the Certificate Issuer playing a critical role, to ensure that the donor signs the LPA without duress and in this case, in a remote situation, I think on the point that the Senior Parliamentary Secretary has just mentioned about expecting written documentations and making sure that this whole process has taken place in a secured way without any duress, can I enquire, because at this point in time, I believe that the attendance notes that any Certificate Issuers would take may vary across between lawyers and doctors, and for example, the judges may feel that there is a higher expectation, from lawyers' point of view, to exercise extra caution and diligence in ensuring that the documents are signed without duress. So, may I suggest that whether MSF can consider issuing a guidance note unifying the expectations of Certificate Issuers, be it from the doctors or the lawyers, to make sure that we are all on the same page, and ensuring that a consistent standard of quality and services are being rendered to ensure and minimise the risk of any disputes that arise subsequently? The second and third clarifications are on how we can help to increase the take-up rate of LPA.”
“In this regard, I would like to ask the Government: how will the Government assure stakeholders, especially those SMEs and elderly who are not IT savvy, of the safety and security of DCP, in particular, what are the safeguards against abuse, scams or cybersecurity threats? (In English): Notwithstanding my clarifications, Mr Speaker, I stand in support of this Bill.”
“Each of these options involve different workflows, timelines for deposits and procedures for releasing its funds. To kickstart adoption of DCP, I suggest that the transactions involving Government agencies, such as HDB and the CPF Board, take the lead in using DCP. Additionally, the Singapore Academy of Law could consider sunsetting its current escrow fee arrangements with a view to eventually merging them into the DCP framework. I also recommend that the SLA partner with institutions, like the Temasek Polytechnic's Diploma in Law and Management, Law Society of Singapore and Council of Estate Agencies, to organise workshops to train the relevant stakeholders, such as students, paralegals, lawyers and real estate agents, in DCP skills so that we can start developing a skilled workforce to support this transition. My next point is in respect of the new section 16W of the Bill which, if passed, will allow deeds relating to immovable property to be executed virtually on PETS. Does this extend to Powers of Attorney for the sale, rental or general management of a real property? Currently, under section 48 of the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act (CLPA), the original Power of Attorney, engrossed with a seal, must be deposited with the High Court. Will the virtual execution on PETS satisfy this requirement moving forward or will amendments to the CLPA be needed? In Mandarin, please. (In Mandarin): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] SLA's DCP makes property transactions seamless, transparent and secure for buyers, sellers, lawyers and estate salespersons.”
“Mr Speaker, I declare that I am a lawyer by profession and oversees the conveyancing department of a law practice that has indicated interest in signing up for the DCP as offered by SLA. I rise in support of the Electronic Conveyancing and Other Matters Bill. I appreciate the objectives behind the introduction of DCP. It streamlines the conveyancing process, enhances convenience and minimises the risk of clerical errors, issues that are often only discovered at the completion stage. Such errors can lead to professional negligence claims, delays in buyers collecting their keys to commence the renovations and even for sellers receiving their proceeds later to purchase their next home. That said, I seek clarification on the current take-up rate for DCP. Has SLA secured sufficient buy-in from all or if not, majority of the stakeholders, such as the real estate agents, property developers, banks that offer mortgage loans and law firms that provide conveyancing services? If not, what are the reasons and how will they be addressed? My next clarification pertains to whether the DCP is intended to eventually be the only platform for conveyancing, the way how eLitigation is used today in the legal practice? If no, a real concern could be that old habits die hard. Without a mandated shift, certain stakeholders, such as banks and law firms, may be resistant to change their established workflows and standard operating procedures. This could lead to confusion. For instance, under current arrangements, deposits or conveyancing monies can be held in either: one, a law firm's conveyancing account; two, with the Singapore Academy of Law under its Conveyancing Money Service; or three, via DCP's Digital Conveyancing Account.”
“As a member of the Sustainability and Environment GPC and Action for Green Town Champion for Marsiling-Yew Tee Town Council, I will continue to engage our residents, relevant agencies and partners to drive these innovations and improve public health conditions, ensuring our communities thrive in line with our collective vision. Mr Speaker, I conclude my speech by appealing to our Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC residents, particularly my Woodgrove residents and fellow Singaporeans, please never hesitate to reach out to me to share your thoughts, your ideas and your aspirations. You will always have a friend in me.”
“For instance, deploying more AI-powered surveillance systems, such as smart cameras or sensors, that could map pigeon and rat activity in real-time, pinpointing breeding hotspots or food sources, like improper waste disposal. Earlier this month, Singapore University of Technology and Design announced that it has developed Singapore’s first robot that can detect mosquito breeding sites and spray repellents. We should encourage and support our town councils to roll out more innovative ideas aiming to significantly reduce manpower, time and safety risks to resolve these challenging municipal issues and I, for one, certainly hope that in the near future one day, we can have a robot rat catcher. Moreover, technology should enhance community engagement. Over the years, we have been encouraging residents to use OneService App to report municipal issues, such as pest sightings, instantly for the relevant agency’s rapid follow up. However, we often receive residents’ feedback that while the platform appears to update that the matter has been followed up and, thus, the case is marked as closed, these issues continue to recur. It will be helpful if we can continue to look into reviewing how such interactive apps can be better enhanced and allowing opportunities for the residents to be kept regularly updated on the efforts made by the agencies in resolving the issue and how each of us can contribute towards resolving such issues. Mr Speaker, OneService App should provide a "one stop" solution to ensure that feedback is promptly followed up and municipal problems can be properly resolved expeditiously. By addressing root causes proactively as a community, we can create safer, healthier environments for our families and seniors.”
“By doing this, we can truly help learners at different stages, supporting the youth to pursue their dreams and older people to continue learning, hence building a more inclusive education system that support Singaporeans to follow their passion without financial worries. (In English): Mr Speaker, I now turn to public health, a pressing concern for Woodgrove and Singapore. Persistent issues, like pigeon feeding, rat infestations and mosquito-borne diseases, continue to challenge our communities, particularly affecting households with young children, seniors and even those with immunocompromised individuals. Pigeons, carriers of diseases, like salmonella and ornithosis, create nuisances through droppings. On land, NEA reported that over 1,000 enforcement actions against rat infestations took place in 2024, nearly double the 670 actions in 2023, as rats pose risks through their urine, droppings and fleas. Meanwhile, notwithstanding that dengue cases have reduced significantly over the years, the Communicable Diseases Agency noted a rise in Chikungunya cases: 21 by August 2025, compared to 10 in 2024, transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes, the same vector for dengue. During my house visits and community events in Woodgrove, residents repeatedly shared their concerns about these issues despite intensified preventive and enforcement efforts by the community and agencies. While these efforts are commendable, they often address symptoms rather than root causes, leaving families worried about health risks. To tackle these challenges more effectively, I urge the Government to explore innovative solutions, particularly putting in more resources to leverage on technology to identify and address the root causes of these public health issues swiftly.”
“Mr Speaker, this vision of a broader definition of success, where we encourage our children to pursue their passions, brings me to my next point: ensuring that education financing supports this shift by enabling access to a wider range of courses that reflect diverse aspirations. In Mandarin, please. (In Mandarin): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Presently, the CPF Education Loan Scheme allows an Ordinary Account owner to use his or her savings to pay for tuition fees for full-time MOE-subsidised courses. The other option comes in the form of MOE's Tuition Fee Loan. Loan coverage is up to 75% for eligible diploma courses, and up to 90% for undergraduate programmes. However, as we encourage our children to pursue their passions, be it in fields like performing arts, environmental design, or emerging technologies like AI and digital media – the current scope of eligible courses under these schemes is too restrictive. Many passion-driven programs, such as those offered by private institutions or specialized academies, fall outside MOE-subsidised categories, leaving several parents I met in Woodgrove sharing their concerns with me of their struggle to finance these aspirations of their children. I urge the Government to broaden the scope of eligible courses under the CPF Education Loan Scheme and Tuition Fee Loan and for more banks to likewise follow suit, to include programs that nurture diverse talents – whether in the arts, vocational trades, or innovative fields. We could consider accrediting high-quality courses from private institutions or expanding subsidies for lifelong learning modules.”
“As a society, and especially by parents of school-going children, the change in mindset must follow. Otherwise, we risk reducing the policy improvements to merely changes in labelling, which would result in a distinction without a difference. On this front, some of my residents have confided in me and shared that despite MOE’s efforts, the practical experience and effects have not or at least do not feel like they have changed much, if at all. Generation after generation, parents, children, and employers have participated in a race defined by academic achievements. The change in mindset will not be engendered overnight, not least because a shift in mindset could mean dropping out of the “arms race”, as mentioned by the Prime Minister in his speech two days ago. Should we encourage our children to pursue their passions and dreams, even if these are unconventional or may not lead to what are perceived as the best employment prospects or best jobs? Does this mean we should do away with or reduce the number of tuition as well as enrichment classes now, or when? What if nobody else does so, and my child ends up having to return to the race with a handicap? These are some of the questions that naturally and frequently arise in many Singaporean parents’ minds. In a society that has become more frenetic, and competition more toxic, as Singaporeans seek to outdo one another, we have become more anxious and stressed, and worse, we pass this on to our children. But I share the same sentiment with the Prime Minister that families, should not feel they are stuck on a treadmill running harder and harder in a bid to avoid falling behind. There needs to be a broader definition of success in Singapore that goes beyond narrow metrics of academic and material.”
“However, the starting point cannot be the trivialisation or dismissal of an employee’s legitimate fertility efforts, and especially not by responding with insensitive remarks or personal attacks. On this note, I assure all aspiring parents who are on your fertility journey or going to embark on the same, that my fellow PAP Women’s Wing Members of Parliament and I will never stop advocating for greater support for all of you. I take this opportunity to also exhort employers to review your existing fertility support policies, or if none exists at this juncture, please urgently implement one. For example, Fertility Support Singapore's Guidebook for Employers to Support Employees Facing Fertility Challenges could be a viable resource to begin with. As Deputy Chairperson of the Education GPC, I am committed to ensuring access to education at all life stages. I shared with this House previously that the late E W Barker once said, "Education should always seek to find and nurture the best in every student, inspiring him to contribute confidently and fully in the area of his own capabilities, rather than made to feel useless and ashamed for not having made it to the top of the school." The intent behind the "generational shift" away from competition based on grades, such as by revising the Primary School Leaving Examination scoring system and those as shared by Minister Desmond Lee in his speech yesterday is laudable. Notwithstanding this, we ought to keenly observe and assess whether the policy objectives have been met, or will be met. Along the way, we will make the policy and legislative refinements in furtherance of those objectives. I say this because the policy intent cannot be met solely by MOE’s efforts alone. It will take every stakeholder's hands to clap.”
“The fertility journey is tough, beginning with the first stage of trying to conceive naturally, which, if unsuccessful, leads to seeking medical advice, and only where suitable can couples embark on initial treatment options, such as in vitro fertilisation. The journey does not end there, as pregnancy may still elude the couple, or in the case of successful conception would then require the couple to take extreme care to minimise the risk of pregnancy loss. Along this journey, couples face a gamut of challenges – physical, emotional, financial and career wise. Crucially, the employee’s experience at work can make or break their dedication to work, fertility treatment, or both. It saddens me when I read some of the comments submitted to Fertility Support Singapore’s sensing poll. My boss joked, "Maybe you're just not meant to be a parent", and my boss demanded two weeks' notice for follicle scans." Mr Speaker, not only are such comments insensitive and unsupportive to an employee who is undergoing a challenging journey, they can feel like personal attacks. On the other hand, there are examples that are positive that we can follow from. Fortunate employees have also shared and reported that fertility benefits are a talent magnet. I quote some of their comments: “When my CEO shared her IVF story, I knew I’d stay; Egg freezing benefits showed they get it; Emotional and mental support to make the journey less lonely and hard to bear.” This need not be a zero-sum situation. Indeed, with the right mindset and support, I am certain that everybody can and will "win". To be clear, I am not at all saying that work exigencies ought to always be deprioritised at the workplace.”
“It would be an opportune juncture for MOE to also consider whether an ITE can be built in the near future in the new Kranji town, offering an even broader variety of tertiary education options for the youths living in the north. Mr Speaker, I turn now to the topic on fertility support, an embracing parenthood cause close to my heart. In 2022, I filed an Adjournment Motion titled "Celebrating SG Families: Embracing Parenthood through Live, Work and Play". In November 2024, I participated in the debate of the Child Development Co-Savings (Amendment) Bill during its Second Reading. In February earlier this year, I moved a Motion with my Parliamentary colleague Mr Zhulkarnain titled "Supporting Singaporeans in Starting and Raising Families". This Motion was passed successfully. During the Committee of Supply in April this year, I spoke on fertility support for first-time parents. Today, I wish to highlight the need for more support for aspiring parents at the workplace. As highlighted repeatedly, the total fertility rate (TFR) fell to a historic low in 2023. In 2024, the TFR remained at 0.97. This existential crisis we face is not over. I refer to the 2025 study conducted by Fertility Support Singapore with Milieu, "Findings revealed that when it comes to facing fertility struggles in the workplace, stigma forces employees into silence, fertility treatments come at a career cost, and workplaces remain lacking in fertility support measures and benefits." As a matter of policy, surely, we can do more. From the perspective of the existential crisis we face, definitely, we must do more.”
“As Prime Minister's fellow Marsiling-Yew Tee MP, I, too, seek to assure fellow Singaporeans, that not only is the North not "ulu", but the planned developments will further transform the north "into a modern and vibrant regional centre." We will be welcome many exhilarating projects in the pipeline, such as the commencement of Johor Bahru-Singapore Rapid Transit System Link operation next year, which will be an additional land link to Malaysia; the expansion of the Woodlands Checkpoint to shorten clearance waiting times, reducing traffic congestion, yet enhancing security; including also the redevelopment of Kranji race course into a new major housing development project, just to name a few. But I want to take this opportunity to share a few additional ideas and suggestions which I have received from my Woodgrove residents to transform our north even further. With the Sports School relocating as part of the Kallang Alive Masterplan, many of the residents have expressed a pity if the site is converted to be yet another housing project. Instead, we should try our best to retain as many of the state-of-the-art facilities there as possible, and convert the facility into a recreational hub for the benefit of the residents. One resident even remarked, "If we have a Downtown East Singapore, why can we not have an "Uptown North" here?" [Mr Speaker in the Chair] I further suggest that the premises can be enhanced further to incorporate green and sustainable solutions, supporting family health and bonding, including ageing-in-place. Additionally, Yishun Innova junior college will be relocated back to its permanent site in Woodgrove and open its doors at the newly upgraded campus in 2028.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, I rise to thank President Tharman Shanmugaratnam and speak in support of His Excellency’s address. As we look back in our nation’s formation journey, Singapore has indeed been on a "remarkable journey". To me, ours is also a never-ending journey because this House can, and will always strive to do better for our Singaporeans. I pause at this juncture, to register my utmost gratitude towards all who have given me the opportunity and support to continue in this journey as a Member of this 15th Parliament. Especially to my Woodgrove residents. Thank you for entrusting me with this honour to renew my commitment of service. Five years ago in my maiden Parliamentary speech, I shared with this House my GEL mission to co-create a brighter future for Woodgrove, where "G" pertains to green living initiatives to sustain our environment; "E" for embracing parenthood to support our families; and "L" for law awareness to empower our community. With the support of our residents and working hand in hand with our ever-supportive community partners, we turned those missions into reality and built an active, vibrant Woodgrove where residents are proud to call home. Today, I want to build on this foundation, drawing inspiration from the Draft Master Plan 2025 and the Prime Minister’s recent National Day Rally to transform the northern parts of Singapore, where Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC is situated, into a more family-friendly and senior-friendly, live, work, learn and play hub, while ensuring our residents can realise their Singapore dreams through determination, passion and lifelong learning. During the National Day Rally, Prime Minister dispelled the myth that the North is "ulu".”
“I will try my best, Mr Speaker. Thank you, Minister, in acknowledging the fact that parent engagement is vital in such situations of bullying. In this regard, I wish to ask how promptly do the schools or the teachers get in touch with the parents? Is it once the bullying incident had occurred, to update the parents at the earliest opportunity, and whether there will be continuous efforts to handhold and work with the parents in addressing the issues? I think, many a times, while we acknowledge and understand that resources are lean, and teachers and schools are working very hard in addressing different issues at the same time, it does comes in useful to assure the parents on the progress and hard work that have been undertaken by the teachers and the schools in their best efforts to address the issue.”