Jackson Lam
Singapore
“As our transport system becomes increasingly digital, maintaining that trust will become one of our greatest competitive advantages. Mr Speaker, Sir, Singapore's story has never been one of standing still. Every generation has had to reinvent the foundations of our competitiveness. Today, we face another moment of transformation.”
“In fact, in 2025, ICA Air Cargo Command officers detected and referred 166 parcels to CNB for investigation. These 166 parcels were suspected to contain drugs or drug-related paraphernalia. In addition to that, we also enhance the awareness of the legal consequences of drug trafficking or drug abuse, so we continue to do that.”
“I have one clarification for Senior Minister of State Faishal. Can I ask how is CNB dealing with drugs traded on virtual platforms, like e-commerce marketplaces and encrypted messaging apps? Assoc Prof Dr Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim: Sir, can you ask Mr Jackson Lam to repeat his question?”
“The Bill updates evidentiary and enforcement provisions to reflect this reality. But even as systems become more efficient, it is important that people continue to have access to clear explanations and meaningful recourse. Systems must not only work well, they must also be fair, transparent and understandable.”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I have two supplementary questions. First supplementary question, what proportion of the vape listings removed were hosted on overseas platform beyond Singapore's jurisdiction? Second, whether stronger legal tools are needed to address overseas-based sellers?”
“I thank the Minister for his replies. I understand that MSF has plans to train up the frontline officers. But before we get there, will MSF consider getting an independent auditor to review the hotline records, so that the case registration failures are not only flagged up internally, but also externally verified.”
The complete record
Every one of 35 lines we hold for Jackson Lam, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account.
“As our transport system becomes increasingly digital, maintaining that trust will become one of our greatest competitive advantages. Mr Speaker, Sir, Singapore's story has never been one of standing still. Every generation has had to reinvent the foundations of our competitiveness. Today, we face another moment of transformation. Our future will not be determined simply by how many containers pass through our ports or how many passengers travel through our airports. It will be determined by whether Singapore becomes the place where technology, talent, trusted institutions and world-class infrastructure come together to create the transport ecosystem of the future. If we succeed, Singapore will remain not only a leading aviation and maritime hub, but also the world's most intelligent, trusted and innovative transport hub, creating better jobs for Singaporeans, strengthening our economic resilience and reinforcing our position at the heart of global trade. Mr Speaker, Sir, I support the Motion.”
“If a Singapore company develops an AI solution that improves cargo handling at Tuas Port or streamlines operations at Changi Airport, that solution can be exported across ASEAN and beyond. In doing so, we are not only exporting transport services. We are exporting Singaporean innovation, creating new opportunities for our enterprises while strengthening our position in regional value chains. Third, as technology transforms transport, we must invest just as strongly in our people. Whenever new technologies emerge, there are understandable concerns about automation replacing jobs. Technology changes jobs far more often than it eliminates them. The real question is whether workers are given the opportunity to adapt. As AI becomes embedded across our transport ecosystem, demand will grow for data analysts, systems engineers, cybersecurity specialists and digital operation managers. Our challenge is to ensure that Singaporeans are equipped to seize these opportunities. This also means to continue to strengthen our SkillsFuture, expanding industry attachments and supporting mid-career workers as they transition into emerging roles. It also means helping SMEs adopt new technologies. Digital transformation should not be something only large multinational companies (MNCs) can afford. If our SMEs can access technology, talent and financing, they too can become part of Singapore's next growth story. Finally, as we become more digital, we must also become more secure. Transport today depends on data just as much as it depends on roads, ports and airports. Cybersecurity, trusted digital identities and secure cross-border data flows are therefore matters of national competitiveness. Businesses choose Singapore because they trust our institutions and the reliability of our systems.”
“Imagine identifying a disruption at a regional hub hours before it affects Singapore, allowing shipping schedules to be adjusted automatically, or carrying out maintenance based on predictive analytics rather than fixed schedules, reducing downtime while improving safety. These technologies are no longer theoretical. They are already being deployed around the world. Singapore has also made encouraging progress. MPA has launched Singapore's first Maritime Digital Twin, a real-time virtual model of our port that supports planning, risk management and operational optimisation. It is also working with industry partners to develop AI applications for route optimisation, fuel efficiency and predictive analytics. The next step is to connect these efforts across our ports, airports, logistics providers and customs systems into an integrated digital ecosystem. When trusted data flows securely across the supply chain, cargo moves more efficiently, businesses gain greater visibility and resources are used more productively. In other words, data itself becomes a source of competitive advantage. Second, Singapore should aspire not only to be a transport hub, but also a transport innovation hub. Throughout our history, Singapore has succeeded not by inventing every technology ourselves, but by becoming the place where innovations are tested, refined and commercialised. We should apply that same philosophy to transport. Many promising innovations are emerging from SMEs and startups developing AI-powered logistics platforms, autonomous inspection systems, warehouse automation and digital trade solutions. Our ports and airports should become living test labs where these companies can test their innovations in real operating environments.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, Singapore has always been more than just a place on the map. Our success has come from connecting people, businesses and ideas with the rest of the world. For a small island with no natural resources, connectivity has never simply been about transport. It has been about survival, resilience and economic competitiveness. Today, this remains just as true. Our aviation sector contributes around 5% of Singapore’s gross domestic product (GDP) and directly employs more than 60,000 people. Our maritime sector is the world's largest container transshipment hub, handling a record 41.12 million TEUs last year, with around 90% of the containers transshipped through our ports. These figures reflect the confidence that global businesses continue to place in Singapore as a trusted gateway to Asia. But we should never assume this position is guaranteed. Across our region, countries are investing heavily in ports, airports and logistics infrastructure. Technology is reshaping global supply chains, while geopolitical tensions are making trade routes more uncertain. Businesses today are looking not only for the fastest route, but also for the most reliable and resilient one. In this environment, our future competitiveness will depend not only on the infrastructure we build, but also on how intelligently we use it. That is why I believe Singapore should focus on three priorities. First, we must become the world's smartest transport hub through AI and data. For decades, our competitive advantage has been operational excellence. The next leap forward will come from intelligence – AI. AI can optimise cargo flows, predict equipment failures before they occur, improve vessel and aircraft scheduling and detect supply chain disruptions before they become costly delays.”
“I would like to ask the Minister, will the shared services by SportSG have sufficient capacity to meet the needs of all NSAs? Second, if the demand exceeds capacity, what framework will SportSG use to prioritise requests?”
“To do so, can the Government consider extending enhanced tax deductions of up to 400% tied to long-term support for these sectors, given their importance to national resilience and unity? A structure that supports multi-year giving pledges with higher deductions will provide planning certainty for arts groups and our sporting organisations. If we are prepared to incentivise investments in technological capability because it strengthens economic competitiveness, we should also be deliberate in incentivising cultural investments that strengthen cohesion. My fourth point is on projecting our national identity. The arts and sport do more than bring us together at home. They also project who we are in the world. Just as our athletes proudly fly the Singapore flat at major international games, could MCCY consider developing a strategy for high-potential arts and cultural groups to perform on the world's most prominent stages and international festivals? When our artists and creators showcase their work on these international platforms, it helps to project confidence in who we are as a nation. If we are proud and confident of our identity, we should also present that identity to the world with equal confidence. Chairman, as we build a future-ready economy, we must also build a future-ready society, one that can help us thrive in these uncertain times. A resilient society invests in its cohesion. The returns may not always appear in economic numbers, but they will be reflected in our pride that we share as a nation. Oxley - National Monument”
“Let us ensure that rising cost of living does not hinder Singaporeans from pursuing their talents in these domains. Second, on the participation in the arts and sports. A vibrant arts and sporting culture also depends on broad participation. A broad base helps to strengthen the talent pipeline. I am encouraged by arts programmes in community spaces and the showcasing of our national athletes in our neighbourhoods. These initiatives embed culture and sport in everyday life. The SG Culture Pass was introduced in Budget 2025 to encourage greater participation in the arts. I would welcome updates by the Ministry on utilisation – whether it is reaching new audiences and increasing regular engagement. Similarly, could the Ministry consider piloting a participation-based mechanism such as an SG Sport Pass, where funding is directed specifically towards programmes delivered by accredited coaches? Not only will this broaden access to structured sports participation, it will also incentivise coach certification and upscaling and strengthen the likelihood of our coaches, many of whom operate as small businesses and enterprises. My third point is on enhancing ecosystem financing. In 2024, sports and the arts received just 3.9% of total charitable giving, suggesting that there is considerable room to crowd in sustained private support, a point that Member Jackson Lam also highlighted. I welcome the extension of the 250% tax deduction for qualifying donations to Institutions of a Public Character (IPCs) until December 2029, announced in the Prime Minister's Budget. But we can do more to crowd in and catalyse sustained giving in the arts and sports by corporations and private donors.”
“First, on the sustainability of our arts and sports practitioners. In both sectors, talent alone is not enough for excellence. Practitioners must be financially secure. Many artists and athletes face income uncertainty. Career spans can be short, income streams uneven, with the burden of support often falling on their families. In the arts, many operate as freelancers or pursue portfolio careers. But to sustain their work at a high level, practitioners must be equipped as professionals able to protect and sustain their work. For self-employed artists, could MCCY consider strengthening advisory and support platforms to better equip them in navigating contract negotiations and protecting their intellectual property (IP) and rights, areas where freelancers can otherwise be vulnerable? For our athletes, given the finite duration of sporting careers, MCCY has already put in place important schemes such as Sports Excellence Business (spexBusiness) and spexEducation to support dual-career pathways. But could the Ministry consider further strengthening these efforts with more structured support for career transitions? This could include providing modules in areas such as sponsorship management, personal brand development and entrepreneurship so that our national athletes are better equipped to support themselves beyond their competitive years. Financial viability also matters in heritage cultural enterprises. As long-standing businesses close, could MCCY consider establishing a targeted succession support initiative, providing advisory support, mentorship and transition planning to help heritage cultural enterprises pass sustainably to the next generation? Sir, we have spoken a lot of cost of living in this Chamber during this debate.”
“00 pm Against this backdrop, feedback from athletes and NSA leaders continues to highlight structural constraints: difficulty retaining coaching talent due to funding uncertainty; challenges in building robust athlete development pathways beyond the elite tier; limited resources for sports science; injury prevention and sustained grassroots outreach. If we expect NSAs to widen participation, strengthen safeguarding standards, develop youth pipelines and support high-performance ambitions, episodic programme-based grants may not be sufficient. I therefore ask the Minister, has MCCY conducted a recent capacity assessment of NSAs to understand where structural gaps, not just financial shortfalls, are impeding long-term development? Beyond periodic funding grants, will MCCY explore multi-year core funding frameworks or partnership models that build organisational stability for NSAs? As Singapore faces an ageing population and persistent physical inactivity challenges, what additional structural support will be provided to NSAs to expand community engagement and broaden participation safely and sustainably? If sport is to remain a pillar of national well-being and identity, then our NSAs must be equipped not only with passion, but with stability, professionalism and long-term resilience. Sustaining Arts and Sport Ecosystems Assoc Prof Kenneth Goh (Nominated Member): Thank you, Chair. In this changed, turbulent world, we must invest just as deliberately in the arts, sport and the cultural ecosystems because these are the human and societal foundations that shape who we are as Singaporeans. In an AI-led world, creative work, sport and cultures will not disappear. They will become even more valuable as distinctly human pursuits. Allow me to make four points in my cut.”
“Mr Chairman, I declare my interest as a Vice-President of an NSA. Sports play an important role in national identity, community health and youth development. Singapore has enjoyed notable successes on the international stage and grassroots sport participation has grown. But if we look more closely at the institutional backbone of our sporting ecosystem, the NSAs, there are structural pressures that deserve attention. Recent public reporting has shown that private sponsorship for sports remain limited. In 2023, sports donations amounted to about S$13 million, representing less than 1% of the total charitable donations in Singapore. Many NSAs and athletes have acknowledged the difficulty of securing sustained corporate backing. This means that associations remain heavily reliant on Government subventions and short-term grants. Whilst NSAs are mainly run by volunteers, MCCY shared in Parliament that Sport Singapore and the Singapore National Olympic Council are working to strengthen their governance and operational capabilities. This is an important recognition. But it also underscores the reality that many associations operate with lean secretariats and limited professional depth. Furthermore, SportSG funding is tied to governance and strategic planning requirements. Currently, funding is provided to 45 out of 63 eligible NSAs, subject to meeting capability criteria. While this promotes accountability, it also means that associations with weaker institution capacity may struggle to secure stable, multi-year support, reinforcing a cycle of fragility. 3.”
“Chairman, the roads in Singapore are among the safest globally and that reflects decades of investment in infrastructure, enforcement and education. Recent figures show year-on-year declines in fatality rates per capita. But one persistent challenge remains: the misalignment of responsibility in road traffic incidents. Too often, when collisions or infractions occur, public discourse frames fault as lying solely with "others" – the reckless driver, inconsiderate cyclist or distracted pedestrian. This mindset risks obscuring the reality that safe mobility is a shared responsibility. Pedestrians, cyclists, motorists and transport planners each have a role in ensuring that our roads functions safely for everyone. 4.45 pm Vision Zero frameworks adopted in parts of Europe and North America, for example, emphasise system design that anticipates human error while reducing its consequences. I therefore ask the Minister, has MOT considered adopting elements of a Vision Zero approach tailored to Singapore, where system design, speed management and clear accountability align across all road users? Second, while engineering and enforcement remain vital, what new educational or behavioural initiatives are MOT planning that go beyond conventional campaigns to foster mutual road user respect? Finally, recognising the rise in micro-mobility usage, what steps will be taken to clarify rights and responsibilities between pedestrians and micro-mobility users in shared spaces, backed by data-driven enforcement rather than ad hoc measures? Mr Chairman, this policy cut is intended to encourage a deeper, more systemic conversation about how we share responsibility for road safety, recognising that blaming "others" alone is not sufficient to drive meaningful behaviour change.”
“And is it enough to help those who fall just outside the eligibility criteria? Third, for those who rely on Community Law Centres and pro bono services, is there enough capacity, especially for family and employment disputes? Fourth, as cases become more complex, has the Ministry considered strengthening early legal advice and triage so people can get proper guidance before problems escalate? Access to justice must not just exist. It must remain practical, affordable and effective. Next, I will touch on growing Singapore as a trusted global IP hub. Mr Chairman, Singapore's future competitiveness depends increasingly on intangible assets such as intellectual property and innovation. Under the Singapore IP Strategy 2030, we have set out a strong vision. But as technology advances, especially in AI, IP policy is no longer just legal policy. It is also economic policy. Businesses today need more than IP registration. They need strong enforcement, proper valuation, financing support and trusted dispute resolution. So, I ask: how are MinLaw and IPOS helping businesses, especially our SMEs, build stronger IP capabilities so that IP becomes a real business asset, not just legal protection? As we move into the next phase of IP Strategy 2030, what more can be done to strengthen Singapore as a global hub for IP dispute resolution, valuation and licensing, especially in new sectors? Finally, with concerns about generative AI using copyrighted works, can the Ministry update us on how it is studying transparency and balancing innovation with protecting creators? This clarity will be important for trust and confidence. Accessible Legal Aid”
“Chairman, the rule of law is one of Singapore's greatest strengths. It gives investors confidence, keeps our society stable and helps Singaporeans trust our system. But for it to stay strong, it must remain accessible to our people and respected around the world. Today, I would like to speak on two areas: first, strengthening access to justice through civil legal aid and socio-legal support; second, strengthening Singapore's position as a trusted global intellectual property hub in a fast-changing technological world. Chairman, in a written reply to a Parliamentary Question on 26 September 2025, the Minister explained the current framework for civil legal aid. The Legal Aid Bureau provides support to Singapore Citizens and Permanent Residents who meet the means test and the merits test. The means test was last revised in 2024, with the per capita household income raised to $1,050 and the Annual Value threshold to $21,000. There is also flexibility through the Means Test Panel for deserving cases. Those who do not qualify can turn to Community Law Centres, run by Pro Bono SG, as well as schemes such as the Family Justice Support Scheme and the Ad Hoc Pro Bono Scheme. These are important avenues. But Chairman, the question is whether this is enough in today's more complex and costly legal environment. Civil cases today, especially family, employment and debt matters, are becoming more complicated. Legal costs have increased and processes are becoming more demanding. So, I seek clarification on four points. First, does the Ministry consider the current $1,050 per capita income threshold sufficient, given rising costs? Are there plans to review it regularly to keep pace with economic conditions? Second, while the Means Test Panel provides flexibility, how often is it used?”
“In fact, in 2025, ICA Air Cargo Command officers detected and referred 166 parcels to CNB for investigation. These 166 parcels were suspected to contain drugs or drug-related paraphernalia. In addition to that, we also enhance the awareness of the legal consequences of drug trafficking or drug abuse, so we continue to do that. So, we take this as something very serious, because we want to protect fellow Singaporeans and to keep Singapore safe and secure. And there was a question about the death penalty survey. Yes, this is something that was asked by Christopher de Souza earlier. I missed the supplementary question. In fact, we continuously do surveys. It is something that we also want to make sure that we get support from Singaporeans, and I must tell you that, because I work actively on the ground, I must say the large majority of Singaporeans continue to want us to have a very strong stance against drugs, and also want us to make sure that we keep themselves, their families safe, and one of the things that they support is the death penalty.”
“How is CNB dealing with drugs trade on virtual platforms, like e-commerce marketplaces and encrypted messaging apps? Assoc Prof Dr Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim: Sir, I thank the Member for the supplementary question. So, while the virtual platforms seem to provide anonymity to the drug offenders, they must know that there is no safe haven for them, because CNB employs a slew of measures or strategies to tackle online drug trafficking. In fact, we are into this whole system a lot more these days, compared to the time when I first started to join MHA. As I shared in my speech, we take proactive measures to monitor these messaging apps and take actions against those who are really facilitating drug trafficking activities here. And if you also relate to some of these activities, they originate from overseas, and it is orchestrated by drug syndicates and we spare no effort in taking actions. In fact, we work very closely to share best practices, experiences and intelligence with our counterparts. Let me give you an example. We work very closely with the Thailand Office of Narcotic Control Board to track down a Singaporean, if you can recollect, Mr Benny Kee Soon Chuan. He was involved in a drug trafficking syndicate in Thailand. In fact, he was using Telegram to receive and collate orders, and then arrange for drugs to be exported to Singapore, where it would be received and distributed by his associate. So 22 September last year, he was issued a detention order under the Criminal Law Act (CLTPA) in view of his involvement in drug trafficking activities. So, this is one source. The other avenue that come in will be through parcel delivery, Sir. Parcel delivery, where we also work with ICA and public sector stakeholders, and also major courier companies.”
“I have one clarification for Senior Minister of State Faishal. Can I ask how is CNB dealing with drugs traded on virtual platforms, like e-commerce marketplaces and encrypted messaging apps? Assoc Prof Dr Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim: Sir, can you ask Mr Jackson Lam to repeat his question?”
“Second, with methamphetamine dominating youth arrests, has the Ministry studied whether digital recruitment, especially through encrypted messaging platforms, is driving earlier exposure? Beyond taking down accounts and syndicates, what proactive digital countermeasures are we considering? Third, at the regional level, given the record methamphetamine seizures and the continued synthetic drug flows, are we strengthening intelligence sharing and joint task force arrangements with key ASEAN partners? Can we do more to disrupt supply chains further upstream instead of focusing at our borders? Fourth, with female drug abusers rising from 15% to 19% of total arrests, should we also be examining whether gender-specific prevention and strategies are needed? Mr Chairman, this policy cut is not about weakening our firm stance on drugs. On the contrary, it reflects concern that the threat is evolving. If one in two new abusers is under 30, and children as young as 12 are being drawn in, then prevention must move upstream – socially, digitally and regionally. We must make sure our strategy stays ahead of the curve, rather than simply responding to it.”
“Before I start, I would like to thank Members for bringing up the drugs issue. It is an issue close to my heart. Chairman, the latest statistics from CNB give us reason to pause and reflect. In 2025, 1,165 new drug abusers were arrested. That is a 17% increase from the year before. Even more troubling, one in two of these new abusers was below the age of 30, and the youngest person arrested was just 12 years old. Among those under 20, nearly 80% were abusing methamphetamine. Cannabis use among youths also remains significant, with new abusers making up to 70% of cannabis arrests. These are not just numbers. They point to something deeper – a growing vulnerability among our young population. At the same time, CNB dismantled 25 drug syndicates last year, including those operating through Telegram and from overseas. Drug seizures amounted to nearly $22 million. Beyond Singapore, the 2025 World Drug Report recorded a record 236 tonnes of methamphetamine seized in East and Southeast Asia in 2024. Southeast Asia alone accounted for 94% of these seizures. Taken together, this tells us we are facing two pressures at the same time: first, increasing exposure among our youths here at home; second, persistent and large-scale production and trafficking flows across the region. Mr Chairman, Singapore's enforcement regime remains firm and respected. But the drug landscape is changing. It is becoming more digital, more decentralised and more transnational. So, I would like to seek clarification from the Minister on four areas. First, given that one in two new abusers is now below 30 and the youngest arrested was only 12, does the Ministry intend to recalibrate its preventive outreach? Should we be engaging children earlier, perhaps even before they enter secondary school?”
“Shared advisory models within industry clusters could allow SMEs to access transformation expertise without bearing the full cost alone. We could also streamline grant processes through pre-approved solution bundles for common transformation projects that will reduce friction and speed up adoption. In some cases, SMEs within the same sector could even pool resources to invest in shared AI tools or digital infrastructure – that will achieve scale without overstretching their balance sheets. Global uncertainty should not lead to hesitation. If SMEs upgrade decisively, they strengthen both employment resilience and long-term competitiveness. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, resilience must be layered. For seniors, it means inclusion and participation. For hawkers, it means sustainable viability. For SMEs, it means execution capability. Macroeconomic stability gives us room to act. But societal resilience determines whether that stability lasts. If we strengthen participation for seniors, sustainability for hawkers and capability for SMEs, we build resilience that is both economic and social. In a changed and uncertain world, that layered strength will determine whether Singapore simply adapts or continues to lead. Mr Deputy Speaker, I support the Budget.”
“Resilience here means balance. Transparency helps build trust. Publishing periodic rental sustainability indicators, even at an aggregate level, can reassure hawkers and the public that rental frameworks remain aligned with operating realities. On digitalisation, grants are available, but adoption is not just about funding. It requires practical guidance. Structured advisory support, perhaps expanded through hawker associations, can help stallholders with cost control, inventory management and digital payments, that will improve productivity without losing authenticity. Succession is another important area. Pairing retiring hawkers with aspiring entrants through structured mentorship and phased handovers could preserve know-how while reducing entry risks for newcomers. Supporting hawkers is not just about economics. It is about preserving everyday infrastructure that holds our communities together. Next, I will touch on our SMEs. Our SMEs are central to our economy. They create jobs, anchor supply chains and generate domestic value. But today, they face a dual challenge – geopolitical uncertainty and rapid technological change. Budget 2026 strengthens financing schemes, internationalisation support and AI-related incentives. These are necessary steps. However, for many SMEs, the issue is no longer awareness. Most business owners know AI matters. The real challenge is execution. Where do they begin? How much should they invest? How do they assess the risks? Resilience in this context requires structured enablement. Sector-specific AI playbooks, developed with trade associations, could provide practical, step-by-step roadmaps tailored to industries such as logistics, retail, professional services and F&B.”
“We could pilot structured second-career pathways in sectors where labour demand remains strong – healthcare support, community care, logistics coordination, SME administration – these pathways can combine modular training, job redesign and clear placement opportunities for workers aged 55 and above. Digital skills are another key area. While SkillsFuture is broad-based, some older workers may benefit from shorter, very practical modules directly tied to specific job roles. A clearly identified "Senior Skills Track" could lower psychological barriers and encourage more to step forward. We should also recognise that information today can feel fragmented. Employment support, CPF matters, healthcare schemes and long-term care arrangements sits across different platforms. A more consolidated, senior-focused interface – even if it is simply a navigational layer – would go a long way in improving clarity and confidence. Ultimately, supporting seniors is not just about financial adequacy. It is about dignity, contribution and about sustaining inter-generational trust. And that trust strengthens us, especially in uncertain times. Next, I will touch on our hawkers. When we talk about hawkers, we often speak of heritage and culture, and rightly so. But we must also remember: hawkers are small business owners operating on very tight margins. At the same time, hawker centres are shared community spaces, places where Singaporeans from all walks of life gather. In a fragmented world, such shared spaces matter even more. Yet, rising rental pressures, volatile input costs and manpower constraints are placing real strain on many stallholders. If costs continue to outpace revenues, the risk is not just about business closures. We risk weakening a layer of our social fabric.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, Budget 2026 comes at a time of real change. The world around us is becoming more fragmented, more contested and less predictable. Last year, our economy grew by 5%, which gives us confidence. But this year's projected growth of 2% to 4% reminds us that external headwinds are real and likely to persist. In this environment, resilience cannot exist only in our fiscal numbers or economic forecasts. It must be felt on the ground, by our seniors, our hawkers and our SMEs. Today, I will focus on these three pillars of grounded resilience. First, I will touch on our seniors. Singapore's ageing population is no longer something we talk about as a future issue. It is already our present reality. We should celebrate the fact that we are living longer. Longer life expectancy reflects the strength of our healthcare system and our social policies. But living longer must also mean living with security and with purpose. If seniors feel uncertain or anxious about their future, that anxiety does not remain isolated. It affects families and ultimately, it affects society as a whole. Budget 2026 takes important steps. CPF top-ups and higher contribution rates strengthen retirement adequacy. The Long-Term Care Support Fund reinforces CareShield Life. The Senior Employment Credit and the Tripartite Workgroup on Senior Employment encourage businesses to continue hiring and retaining older workers. All these are meaningful moves. As life expectancy rises, retirement itself is changing. Many seniors today are healthy, experienced and still eager to contribute. So, the question we should ask ourselves is: are our systems ready for multi-stage careers?”
“The Bill updates evidentiary and enforcement provisions to reflect this reality. But even as systems become more efficient, it is important that people continue to have access to clear explanations and meaningful recourse. Systems must not only work well, they must also be fair, transparent and understandable. Singapore has always done well because people trust that our systems are designed with care, applied proportionately and corrected when they fall short. This Bill helps to maintain that trust by modernising our laws while keeping people at the centre. Mr Speaker, this Bill is not about regulation for its own sake. It is about responding responsibly to technological, demographic and social change. It seeks to protect seniors, support mobility, improve safety and modernise enforcement, without losing sight of fairness and common sense. With careful implementation and continued engagement, the Land Transport and Related Matters Bill 2026 will strengthen, not just our transport system, but also the confidence Singaporeans place in it. I therefore support the Bill.”
“Many of us will recall reports of fires in residential blocks linked to such devices. These incidents are frightening because they do not affect just one household. They put neighbours, families and the entire block at risk. The introduction of an offence for keeping unsafe devices, even when they are not actively used, reflects an important reality that risks often arise long before an incident occurs. At the same time, I welcome the reasonable-excuse safeguards and transitional arrangements. These ensure enforcement remains proportionate and humane. Clear public education will be essential so that people understand what is expected of them. Mr Speaker, Sir, the Bill also addresses road safety more broadly, particularly through amendments to the Road Traffic Act. I welcome the clarification that mandatory disqualification periods are minimum periods, restoring the original legislative intent following recent judicial interpretation. Too often, attention comes only after something bad happen – when lives are lost or permanently changed. Clearer statutory guidance strengthens deterrence, while still allowing Judges the discretion to respond fairly to the seriousness of each case. The enhanced speed limiter regime for heavy vehicles is also timely. When safeguards are bypassed, the harm caused can be severe and irreversible. Tightening these controls reflects lessons learned through experience and reinforces our commitment to road safety. Finally, Mr Speaker, Sir, I would like to touch on a broader theme that runs through this Bill – trust in systems, especially as Singapore relies more heavily on automation and digital enforcement. From speed cameras to electronic charging systems, technology now plays a central role in transport management.”
“At the same time, the Bill reinforces an important principle: our footpaths and common spaces are shared. As devices become faster or heavier, greater responsibility must follow. Clear rules protect pedestrians, but they also protect responsible users who rely on these devices and do not want to be unfairly judged because of the actions of a few. When I speak with residents, the concern is rarely about seniors who truly need these aids. More often, it is about uncertainty. People ask: what is allowed? What is safe? And if something goes wrong, who is accountable? When there is uncertainty, trust in shared spaces begins to erode. This Bill provides much-needed clarity. That said, rules alone are not enough. Implementation will matter just as much. Seniors navigating medical assessments, online systems or registration processes should not feel anxious or overwhelmed. I encourage the Ministry to continue pairing regulation with strong outreach through community centres, healthcare providers and grassroots organisations, especially during the transition period. Compliance should come from understanding and support, not fear. I also welcome the Bill's focus on upstream responsibility, particularly the stronger controls on the sale, advertisement and possession of unsafe or non-compliant devices. Too often, enforcement falls mainly on end-users, even when powerful devices are marketed without proper safeguards or clear information. This does not feel fair. By placing clearer responsibility on sellers and platforms, the Bill improves accountability and sends a clear message that safety must be built in from the start. Related to this are the provisions dealing with unsafe devices, including those that are modified or uncertified.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I rise to speak on the Land Transport and Related Matters Bill. I do so not only as a Member of this House, but as someone like many Singaporeans who uses our transport system every day – walking through neighbourhoods, sharing footpaths and relying on our roads and common spaces to feel safe and predictable. Transport policy may be debated here, but its impact is felt outside this Chamber. It is felt on our footpaths, in lift lobbies and in the confidence that people have when they move around their neighbourhoods. In that sense, this Bill is not just technical or administrative. It is about how we update our rules to reflect how people live today, while continuing to keep everyone safe and included. Over the past years, many Members would have seen reports of mobility devices colliding with pedestrians, or fires linked to unsafe or modified devices stored in residential blocks. These incidents are unsettling. Not because mobility aids are the problem – they are not. But because they show that our rules have not fully kept up with how these devices are being used and sometimes misused, in shared public spaces. Mobility devices today are more powerful and more widely available than before. If used properly, they make a real difference to people's lives. If used irresponsibly or without safeguards, they can pose risks to others. This Bill is timely in addressing that gap. The clearer definitions of mobility vehicles, together with mandatory registration and the requirement for a Certificate of Medical Need for certain devices, strike a careful balance. They recognise that many seniors and persons with disabilities, these devices are not conveniences. They are essential tools that allow people to remain independent, mobile and connected to the community.”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I have two supplementary questions. First supplementary question, what proportion of the vape listings removed were hosted on overseas platform beyond Singapore's jurisdiction? Second, whether stronger legal tools are needed to address overseas-based sellers?”
“I thank the Minister for his replies. I understand that MSF has plans to train up the frontline officers. But before we get there, will MSF consider getting an independent auditor to review the hotline records, so that the case registration failures are not only flagged up internally, but also externally verified.”
“I thank the Minister of State for his reply. Can I ask whether the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) is working with other agencies to develop verification tools or secure channels for our business owners to verify the authenticity of the orders, when orders are made?”
“I believe that as long as we take good care of our older generation and our young people, we can link the past with the future, and together, make Singapore not just only a more prosperous, but also more heartwarming place. (In English): In conclusion, Mr Speaker, Sir, the President reminded us that Singapore must uphold trust, deepen unity and ensure that progress is inclusive. I fully agree. I believe unity happens when people feel they belong. Our seniors want to know that they are not being left behind in a fast-changing world. Our struggling youths want to believe they still have a chance. If we take care of both, we secure our past and protect our future. I hope to see a Singapore where generations do not live apart but grow together, where community is not just a slogan, but something we feel every time we step into a lift, or a hawker centre, or a park. I am new to this House and I promise from the onset that I will do the work, I will listen to those whose voices tremble, I will speak up when silence becomes too loud. And I will always remember why I am here, not for myself, but for those who gave me this seat. Singapore is often praised for its efficiency. But I hope we will also be known for our empathy. That, to me, is real progress, not just being the best, but being good. Mr Speaker, Sir, I support the Motion of Thanks and I thank the House and all Singaporeans for giving me this chance to serve. [Applause.]”
“Let us strengthen our vocational tracks, not as second choices, but as first-rate options. Let us expand mentorship programmes in the trades, in entrepreneurship and in the arts. And we can all play a part too. It could be a hawker stall uncle who gives a teen a weekend job; a teacher who checks in after class; a grassroots leader who listens without judgement; when we wrap a net of care around our youth, they fall less and climb more. A young person who feels seen, who feels believed in, will rise to the challenge. We just have to give them the room to do so. Mr Speaker, Sir, now a few words in Chinese. (In Mandarin): Mr Speaker, I hope Singapore can do more for our elderly, enabling them to participate in building our community cohesion. We do not necessarily need large-scale policies, but rather through some creative community programmes, such as making good use of public spaces, allowing them to enter schools and community kitchens and so forth, to build relationships with the younger generation, and live fulfilling and active lives. I also hope we can continue our efforts to walk alongside our elderly step by step on the digitalisation journey. Our young people, especially marginalised youth, also need more help. I hope that programmes designed for young people can be developed with more long-term stable resources, allowing them to help each other and realise their potential together. Young people should also continue to have more pathways to success, letting them know that "heaven has endowed everyone with talents for eventual use". As long as we believe in their abilities, they, too, will learn to believe in themselves.”
“IMPARTSG supported Narish through his "N" level as a private candidate and his subsequent traineeship at ITE. Thereafter, Narish returned to intern at the organisation, driven by his passion to empower others facing similar challenges. In 2023, IMPARTSG sponsored Narish for a Work-Study Diploma programme in Community Engagement and Development. Today, he balances his studies while leading a sepak takraw initiative called GIC-APEX, which connects over 99 youths across communities like Ghim Moh, Ang Mo Kio, Woodlands and Jurong East. One individual who has been touched by Narish's work, let us call him Albert. He is 16 years old and a survivor of an e-bike battery explosion in 2018. Due to the trauma, Albert suffered from severe anxiety, school refusal and social isolation. Narish approached him with empathy and created a safe space and developed a plan to integrate Albert's love for sepak takraw with his social reintegration. Today, Albert flourishes as a regular community volunteer working with seniors on Age Well programmes. Narish's story reminds us of the collective potential we unlock when we invest in our youths and empower them to uplift others. This is real transformative power when we come together for common good. There are many others like the old "me" and Narish in our community. That is why such programmes in the community matter so much. These are not short-term projects. They are long-term lifelines. We must support such programmes, not just with grants and pilots, but with sustained, long-term funding. It means building stronger bridges between schools and community groups. It means trusting our youth sector to innovate and backing them when they do. I also believe we need to continue broadening the definition of success for our youths.”
“I have seen elderly persons struggle to book polyclinic appointments or get flustered accessing Government services on their phones. The answer is not to tell them to catch up, but it is to walk with them, one gentle step at a time. I would like to commend the efforts of the SG Digital Office to provide community digital clinics. I hope these can be further expanded to include peer learning, where digitally savvy seniors guide their fellow neighbours or pairing youths with seniors as an intergenerational activity. At the heart of this is a simple principle: ageing well is not just about living longer; it is about living with purpose and joy. Mr Speaker, Sir, I now turn to our young people, specifically those who are quietly struggling and often out of sight. These are the youths who do not always show up in statistics. They may skip class, drift into the wrong company, or simply stop believing they have a future. I was one of them myself. I did not have much family support. I did not know who to look for or where to look for help. I mixed with the wrong company and got into all kinds of trouble during my secondary school days. Essentially, I became one of those kids that parents tell their children to stay away from. Thankfully, my secondary school teachers had an abundance of patience, guidance and belief that every student can grow and succeed. Thanks to them, I managed to turn my way around. My new friend Narish went through a similar journey. He is the first youth to receive support from IMPARTSG in 2017 after facing significant challenges through his childhood and teenage years. Some of us here may be familiar with IMPARTSG. It is a charitable organisation whose core mission is to give youths facing adversity a fighting chance.”
“They want to play their part in the community. They want to feel like they still matter. I met Mdm Ho recently. She is a retiree and often organises seniors' exercise sessions in the Nee Soon community. She also encourages the group to have potluck sessions during festive celebrations. Today, the group has grown to 50 seniors. There could be many more warm-hearted elderly, just like Mdm Ho, in our community. They bring our residents and neighbours together. We should support such ground-up efforts and share them with the broader community. Growing old should not feel like growing invisible. "家有一老，如有一宝" (elders in a family are like treasures) should not be just lip service. Our seniors are a gift, not a burden to be managed. Government initiatives, such as the Action Plan for Successful Ageing, and the co-location of eldercare and childcare services have laid strong foundations. But we must do more to reimagine what ageing can look like; where seniors are fully present, where they mentor, share or shape their communities. Imagine primary schools where seniors come to read to students, share stories of the olden days or simply help with co-curricular activities. Imagine void decks with community kitchens, where older folks share their family recipes with the younger residents. All these are not grand policy moves, but they build connection and connection is what keeps people going. Let us also look at our common areas. Many are quiet during weekdays. Can we turn them into intergenerational spaces? Community gardening, music corners where young and old can perform together. These are small ideas that add a soft touch to our daily lives. And let us not forget digital inclusion. As our services transition online, we must ensure our seniors are not locked out.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I rise in support of the Motion of Thanks to the President for his address. This is my first time speaking in this House, and I do so with gratitude, humility and a full heart. I treasure the chance to speak up on behalf of other regular Singaporeans, just like myself. I come to this Chamber with a commitment to listen, to care and to take action. I wish to express my appreciation to all those who have served in this House before me. Their dedication has shaped the Singapore we live in today. It is now our turn to continue that work with conviction, compassion and courage. The President reminded us, in his address, that we are at a critical juncture in our nation’s journey. We were reminded that the world around us is changing in profound way and uncertainty is becoming the new normal. Yet, we are not a vessel adrift. By strengthening our security, transforming our economy, sustaining mobility and putting "we" before "me", we can chart our course with confidence and unity. How do we do that? A Chinese saying has guided me in my journey as a volunteer and now as an MP, "老吾老，以及人之老; 幼吾幼，以及人之幼." To honour the elderly as we do so for our elderly at home and care for others' children as we care for our own. Let me start with our seniors. We all know the numbers. Singapore is ageing quickly. In just five years, a quarter of our citizens will be aged 65 and above. But numbers alone do not move hearts. We all know of some aunties who live alone and almost never leave the house, or uncles sitting by themselves with their kopi at coffeeshops, watching the world move past them, growing quieter every day. I think about my own grandmother and the older neighbours who watched me grow up. Many of them want to feel connected to the community they are in.”