K Thanaletchimi
Singapore
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I just wish to highlight that one or two of the schools, they built lifts near to the gym. A gym is supposed to be where students exercise and they are supposed to be climbing the stairways. But instead the lifts are built alongside and not at the mainstream classrooms' column.”
“I thank the Senior Parliamentary Secretary for the reply. I just wish to know, when lifts are built, are the teachers consulted on the locations where the lifts are to be built? Is there any consultation or review with the teachers in the school before it has been planned to be built?”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I would like to thank the Senior Minister of State Dr Amy Khor for the reply. Dr Khor mentioned that the Skills Framework will be out at the end of this year. May I know which profession or category of jobs in the Skills Framework will be out? Is it particularly nursing, allied health or all the other categories of jobs?”
“I would also like to ask the Minister if the Primary Care Network clinics are considered to be on par with the general practitioner clinics, so that, under the EA, the medical certificates (MCs) are recognised and also, they are able to get reimbursements from the employers.”
“I would like to ask the Minister a follow-up question on those companies on the FCF Watchlist. Are they still eligible for Government funding, such as Adapt and Grow and all the others, to improve their businesses? Are they still eligible to apply for those kinds of fundings?”
“Can the Government review and consider for a second wave of PG Package for those who missed out on the last wave? Healthcare needs are major concerns of our older citizens. We need to look after their needs adequately.”
The complete record
Every one of 215 lines we hold for K Thanaletchimi, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 3 of 5.
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I rise in support of the Bill. The PEB was set up to safeguard life, property and the welfare of the public by setting and maintaining high standards for registering PEs, and by regulating and advancing the practice of professional engineering. For PEB to take on the role of development of professional engineering is a natural progression as it has the resources and Government support that are required and the neutrality to allow the different engineering branches and professional engineering associations a platform to help brand and push forward the engineering profession such that customers and engineers alike recognise the value of a registered PE. Continual upgrade of technical skills and project management skills and safety awareness education should be developed to help prevent engineering tragedies that lead to severe loss of lives. Sir, notwithstanding, I have the following clarifications. One, that determines "Professional Engineering Work" and why is it that only certain branches prescribed under section 10(A) are required to register? Two, the rationale to amend section 15(2), as the explanation notes point out, is to allow an undergraduate to be registered as a PE. Should there also be a qualification in terms of stipulated years of work experience and review of projects the engineer had managed or undertaken before allowing engineers to be certified? Three, the re-enactment of section 35 and the new section 35A provides the necessary safeguards to encourage whistleblowing and eliminate any scapegoating behaviour that may be adopted by the management. This, indeed, will help protect the rights of PEs and prosecute the relevant parties that may be responsible.”
“In the amendment to the First Schedule, clause 17(5) clearly outlines the number of proxy votes one can hold so as to prevent any abuse by a single resident in the estate. This is a rule that is upheld at most professional bodies and this is much welcomed. Sir, I am, indeed, heartened that changes to the Bill reflect a well-balanced consideration for governance, safety and protection of stakeholders.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I rise in support of the Bill for it is a move in the right direction to uphold governance and transparency. However, I would like to clarify the following. The amendment to section 18(1) requires developers to give greater accountability as they are now required to submit a maximum rate of maintenance charges that is pre-approved by the Commissioner. This should result in greater certainty of the costs to the tenants and residents. It could also help ensure that developers act as greater stewards, ensuring better planning and are more careful of incurring any incidental expenditure. Having said that, how is this maximum rate of maintenance charges computed and how often is this reviewed? Section 37A is a welcomed amendment that helps to safeguard lives and works around past rigidities that building managers may hold. Allowing home owners/SPs flexibility to install safety equipment that does not impact the building's structure is a reasonable change to the law. However, the owners/proprietors must be responsible enough to ensure that only contractors with safety track record are called upon to do such installation for home safety measures and not, when doing so, endangers the safety of others or the condition of the structures could potentially cause damage. As for section 126B(5), what would be a guideline relating to the remuneration of an OM and how often does the Commissioner review this? It is good that safeguards are in place. Section 126B(4) includes the provision to rectify any foul play that could arise in terms of underpayment or overpayment. This is a positive change and I welcome it.”
“On the transfer of employees and their terms and conditions and issues pertaining to their transfer of employment, it is pertinent for the respective agencies of the affected staff to discuss the matter or had discussed the matter with the respective union or affected staff and give them ample time to arrive at a decision. A smooth and well thought through transfer will bring about greater staff morale and contentment. Pre- and post-employment transfer feedback from the affected staff should be addressed to ensure employees' operational efficiency.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, this Bill, which proposes to consolidate the Industrial Property Management to be under JTC and, therefore, the Industrial Properties Group Department from HDB to JTC, is a welcome move. With this, JTC is now the "go to" agency when it comes to industrial property rental and resources and "know-how" on industrial properties while HDB can focus on the residential needs of the nation. This move is very much applauded as it allows previous HDB industrial tenants to have access to more industrial properties and give them greater ability to do long-term planning. In the pursuit of restructuring the services rendered, it would be very much appreciated that much endeavour is taken to ensure that the affected employees are not worse off, with years of services being recognised and benefits being no less favourable. Sir, though this consolidation will largely benefit the whole intent and purpose of streamlining services with target customers at the heart of service, I would like to suggest and clarify on the following. With reference to section 39(3), I would like to suggest disciplinary investigations and actions could be completed by HDB rather than brought over to JTC. This is to ensure that the employee starts with a clean slate with a new organisation. Section 39 declares that a transfer as such will not give rise to any damages or compensation. To what extent was there consultation with the affected employees at HDB on their concerns of the transfer? The change in top management and organisation and issues, such as physical location of workplace and others, can impact the employee. If employees were not keen on the transfer to the new organisation, will they be given an option to redeploy the employee within HDB?”
“Those who graduated or are currently pursuing STEM, Finance or Accountancy courses/degree programmes fear that there will not be much prestige and recognition accorded to these programmes. Perhaps, the university could have been given a more neutral name and yet clearly represent the essence, substance and flavour of social sciences. From the employment perspective, as the sixth AU which comes directly under the purview of MOE, will there be changes to the remuneration and benefit packages of the employees, including training and upgrading, and will it be favourable? Sir, notwithstanding these, the change is, indeed, a step in the right direction as it clearly reflects and demonstrates the commitment of the Government to lifelong learning and, with this, I fully support the Bill.”
“Deputy Speaker, Sir, the restructuring and rebranding of UniSIM to SUSS to reflect its focus on social sciences are a highly commendable move. It demonstrates the increasing relevance and importance of the study of social sciences and the format of education. In a recent media interview, the hon Minister for Higher Education and Skills, Mr Ong Ye Kung, very eloquently put it, "The name was chosen to reflect the university's mission of driving lifelong learning anchored in disciplines with a strong social focus." I very much support this Bill which provides huge opportunities for adult learners to pursue an applied education in the social sciences. It also speaks of the importance of analytical and critical thinking skills and would provide a more holistic view in policy planning and research. UniSIM has been the go-to institution for adult learners who prefer the flexibility of acquiring a part-time degree while working full-time. However, with the shift of focus onto programmes which prepare for careers in the social sector, there will be a reduced focus and offerings in areas, such as business accountancy and engineering, for the adult learners. Will this reduction then be balanced or compensated by the other universities or institutions to ensure continued opportunities for adult learners, especially when greater importance is being placed for science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) programmes which are relevant for the current and future-ready jobs? I shall now touch on the name change. As mentioned by Mr Louis Ng, many Singaporeans do welcome this change. However, the name accorded has received a mixed reaction amongst many, including the past and present SIM/UniSIM students.”
“It is important to have an independent body so that the system gains trust from the public by ensuring openness and transparency. Who will appoint and who will be appointed as members of the Appeal Board? What are their terms of reference? If the appeal is rejected, will there be recourse for the aggrieved party? Fourth, while I note the proposal to increase the penalty for conducting PE without a licence, what is the rationale for such an increase? Has there been an increase of such cases of conducting PE without a licence? Being a strong proponent of public education and awareness, I would like to propose that we channel the funds collected from these fines into public education. Will there be a periodic review of the classifications of the various PE and arts as well as licensing requirements? Madam, notwithstanding these, I support the Bill.”
“Mdm Speaker, I rise in support of the Bill. The world order is changing at breakneck speed and people's preferences and desires are similarly being transformed. As our society matures with changing times, technological advances are taking precedence in all sectors, including the arts and entertainment. As Singapore safeguards itself against the constant threats of various forms, a tighter control over PE events seems to be a necessary evil. As this may impact the creativity element of individuals, groups, businesses and organisations which put together such events, the Government needs to maintain a fair balance. When control measures with tighter licensing requirements are introduced to protect the safety and security of the society, it is important to ensure that creative efforts are not stifled. However, Madam, I have the following clarifications in regard to the Bill. The omission of the word, "meetings" from the title of the Bill makes a major shift and, henceforth, the initial purpose of the Bill. There needs to be greater clarity on the separation of public meetings from PE. Both PE and public meetings need to be in line with community standards and public decency and uphold the law and public order. Two, there needs to be more clarity on the purpose of this Bill. With the amendments, what are the licences that will be refused and suspended? What are some of the examples that were refused and suspended before? And what were the bases for refusing and suspending these licences? Third, one of the provisions in the Bill is to set up an independent PE Appeal Board which will assess and handle appeals against certain decisions of the PE Licensing Officer. The key word here is "independent".”
“We need to have deliberate means of providing women with these opportunities if we want to see real progress in the next 50 years.”
“I am confident that men can also rise to the occasion if they were properly nurtured into the role and given the right support. This is especially important as our population ages and more working adults are called to provide caregiving to their elderly. Whether parenting or eldercare, it cannot be seen as a woman's job just because we are good at it. Setting targets to enable more women to take on leadership roles is equally important. Finally, I would like to touch on the topic of target-setting to improve women representation on boards. On 24 March 2017, BoardAgender and People's Action Party Women's Wing called for the 2020 target setting of working towards having at least 20% of women on boards of directors by 2020 as an aspirational goal. Looking at the lack of progress in getting women on board, I would urge the Government to adopt the recommendation. Equally important is how we can adopt similar target-setting at different levels of the career ladder. This is to ensure that we will have a continuous stream of women talent being nurtured at different levels of leadership so that we will not be at a loss while finding women directors to make up 20% of the board. What can the Government do to encourage a more systematic inclusion of women at various levels of leadership so that more women may take on top leadership positions or boards of director than the current 9.7%? One way is to include programmes or curriculum in tertiary institutions that will allow women to have a mock experience. While they are in employment, under talent management programmes, these women can be further identified and put through programmes that will enable them to further shine in their roles.”
“This is more than Work Pro that is provided for FWAs. Other than stopping the leak of experience, such flexible work arrangements, like job-sharing, can also attract women back into the workforce. After spending some time away from the labour market for family care, these women may want to step up gradually to help their families as well as themselves transit back into the working world. If the women can work in meaningful part-time or job-sharing roles, they will have more opportunity to reskill or update their skills while contributing economically. We need to support women to return to work. Earlier this year, the National Trades Union Congress made a call for the Government to support women PMEs who wish to return to the workforce after a period of absence through a returnship programme where companies take in women PMEs with work experience for three to six months to help them to assimilate back into the working world. At the end of the returnship period, employers may choose to offer these women a position in the company and the women can decide if they would like to be part of the company. Can the Government support enlightened employers who are willing to embark on the returnship programme through funding and recognition, and handhold them in guiding these women returnees? FWAs should not be seen as a privilege or entitlement for working women, but for all employees with responsibilities and aspirations outside of work. Perhaps it is timely for MOE to look into incorporating education on gender equality and shared caregiving between genders. At the heart of the unlevel playing field is the issue of unequal caregiving roles between genders. Women may be better caregivers by nature.”
“Now, I touch on flexible work arrangements to support women in the workforce as well as women returnees. We need to decisively plug the leak of experience out of Singapore's labour market by enabling women to remain in the workforce. This can be done through the implementation of flexible work arrangements (FWAs). Flexible work arrangements are becoming an increasingly viable option for both businesses as well as employees as we move into the digital age and grow our pool of knowledge workers. With more workers in professional, managers and executives (PME) roles, job-sharing, where one full role is shared among two to three employees, is a viable role especially suited for PMEs who wish to scale up on their family-care roles while their children are young. Young working parents, especially mothers, can still have a meaningful career and contribute to the economy. On a lighter note, the last point I wish to make is that we also need to acknowledge that stereotypes do not just affect women. They affect men as well. When we fight gender stereotypes levelled against women, we also need to be conscious that we do not end up confirming male stereotypes while nurturing our young. However, employers have been reluctant to offer such options, citing increased manpower costs when taking into consideration the whole salary package, for example, employees' insurance costs. Until they experience the tangible benefits of retaining their female talents, there will be inertia to move. Is the Government able to defray part of the increased cost of rolling out flexible work arrangements, such as job-sharing, so that businesses are more willing to embark on exploring the viability of such working arrangements on a more permanent basis?”
“Mdm Speaker, I rise in support of the Motion. In Singapore, human capital is our mainstay in attracting foreign investment and growing our economy in this first world era. Given that female enrolment at local Polytechnics is 89% of male enrolment and at university level for first degree is at 95% of male enrolment, the Government has been spending almost an equal amount on educating our young women as our young men. Therefore, it is critical that investment in our people see good returns, that is, having its people remain in the workforce, remain economically active and contributing to civil society. With women labour force participation rate at 60.4%, 40% of women are not working, with family care being the main reason for dropping out of the workforce. I think it has been quite well-established that, given a choice, women want to have a career and still be able to fulfil their roles as caregivers in the family. The Government has done much in supporting working parents through the Baby Bonus package, which comprehensively includes parental tax rebates, parental leave and cash support. The introduction of paternity leave is a bold step in the right direction in inculcating the culture of shared parenting. However, more can and needs to be done to level the playing field for women. Until we have a pervasive family- and women-friendly work culture, two groups of women need to be supported if we are serious about tapping on the 40% of women who are currently out of the workforce − the working women in danger of dropping out of the workforce due to family-care reasons and the women who would like to return to the workforce after a period of intensive caregiving. We need to do more creatively to enable women to remain at work.”
“Madam, I would like to seek a clarification on the Attach and Train programme, the new initiative that was announced by MOM. Could the Minister enlighten if this Attach and Train programme can be more pervasive, now that it is being introduced across all institutions in healthcare, including the ILTC sector.”
“Madam, I would like to seek one clarification regarding the PCP. Could the Minister share if the programme is standardised across all the institutions or is it very customised to individual institutions, as the career the Minister talked about aligns to all the institutions?”
“Third, how many organisations or companies have cyber insurances to minimise their losses or liabilities which often comes with greater awareness of cybercrimes and means to secure and tighten their cybersecurity? Lastly, Madam, Singapore's CSA's concern on the lack of awareness of cybersecurity amongst Singaporeans is real. And the challenges are here to stay as our cyber transactions, cyberspace communication and cyber connectivity have increasingly become a vital part of our lives with social media use being highly pervasive. On this note, have we done enough and taken all possible measures to educate and increase the awareness of cybersecurity amongst students, employees, employers, social agencies as well as members of the public? I believe there is still room for improvement. With that, thank you, Madam.”
“Mdm Speaker, I rise in support of the Bill. This Bill aims to address the increasing scale and transnational nature of cybercrime, as well as the evolving tactics of cybercriminals' punishable offences. As the cyber workspace expands, it is important to secure individuals, organisations and Singapore from being victims of cyber intrusions and cyberattacks which could hurt the very heart of Singapore's cyber connectivity and economic vibrancy. For our Smart Nation Programme to realise its objectives, a safer cybersecurity ecosystem is required, and it needs to be strengthened as new developments and tactics evolve and are exploited by cybercriminals. Madam, at this point, I wish to seek the following clarifications. Will the key information infrastructure operators, such as energy, finance and transport operators, be required to report on incidences of breaches or attempted breaches of cybersecurity as and when they occur rather than when directed by the Minister? Will such reporting be extended to the other business sectors, too? Second, what is the awareness level of cybersecurity and its importance to all companies in Singapore, especially small and medium enterprises? How well are these companies protected? Do these companies see the importance of it and invest adequately in cybersecurity to protect both their individual workers' and clients' data? Will there be support and assistance for companies in instituting a holistic approach to protecting their cybersecurity system from cybercrime? Madam, for better security, we require companies' cooperation, effort as well as commitment to build cybersecurity capabilities and invest in employees' education for awareness and implementation of best practices in their usual work processes.”
“If, or should the Town Council fail or does not perform satisfactorily or perform up to par, how would the Ministry, as the body with regulatory and oversight over the Town Council, deal with it? Madam, notwithstanding these, I rise in support of the Bill. 4.44 pm”
“Mdm Speaker, I declare my interest in this Bill as a dwelling resident of an HDB estate run by a Town Council. I am glad and fortunate to be living in Ang Mo Kio GRC, a precinct well-run by Dr Intan Azura. I truly believe in governance and accountability to every Town Council resident, for that matter. So, let me give a different perspective as a resident of a Town Council. Madam, the amendments to the Town Councils Act, if passed, will, indeed, further strengthen Town Council governance as it demands greater transparency and gives the MND more power to compel Town Councils to declare their financials in an appropriate and timely manner. The amendments will help tighten financial discipline and strengthen accountability and transparency by requiring Town Councils to submit the audited financial reports within six months of the FY and keep a registry of disclosures on conflicts of interest involving staff members or employees. This is important as residents do pay conservancy charges and it is important that they know where the money goes to. It further stresses that Town Councils that fail to comply with the Act will be fined up to $5,000 and key decision-makers can be prosecuted for the failure. Madam, it is, indeed, notable that the Bill also proposes for a Code of Governance, setting out standards which Town Councils need to adhere to. In view of the fact that Town Councils in the first place were created to decentralise the estate management of the residential town, therefore, do the amendments intend to include a provision to allow different Town Council management regimes in the future?”
“As a further clarification to section 84A(2), will trustees be allowed to authorise a relevant agent, that is, the support staff managing the trust, to upkeep the obligations required under 84A(2)?”
“Mdm Speaker, I support the Bill as it will enhance Singapore's reputation as a trusted international financial centre and reinforce our commitment as a responsible member of the international community to global efforts in countering money laundering, terrorism financing and tax evasion. The changes will further help to make the ownership and control structures of trusts more transparent and improve financial record-keeping by trustees. Madam, I would like to seek clarifications on the following. The Mutual Evaluation Report (2016) provides a comprehensive report of the anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism measures in place in Singapore. It analyses the level of compliance with the FATF 40 recommendations and provides recommendations on how the system could be strengthened. Some of the amendments in this Bill are the result of the recommendations. The report specifically highlighted the lack of enforceable obligations on trustees to collect beneficial ownership information relating to a trust beyond the immediate beneficiary. Similarly, the GF requirements may also change, subject to the findings of FATF on the study of the Singapore financial actions landscape and requirements set by GF and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The amendment Bill in section 84A(1)(a) and (b) provides for the Minister to make such regulations that are necessary to give effect to the FATF recommendations and GF requirements. As such recommendations and requirements may change from time to time, how will the details of the changes be made known and what is the lead time given to the affected parties to comply?”
“Just a quick one. I would just like to ask the Senior Minister of State Dr Amy Khor how prepared are our healthcare institutions in managing a diverse workforce? Do they have policies on diversity management in ensuring equal opportunities when the healthcare workforce comprised people of different nationalities or Singaporeans, as well as getting people of disabilities to work in the healthcare along with ex-convicts? They can be a potential alternate source of workers. 3.00 pm”
“It is important to align and standardise best practices for systems and processes to keep our healthcare system safe and affordable. The reorganisation is a step in the right direction. I would also urge that MOH consider having health volunteers, health ambassadors to penetrate the community to address the need of an ageing population better and tapping into the pool of caregivers or domestic helpers. Manpower Cost and Sustainability”
“How ready are MOH and the respective healthcare regulatory bodies in recognising modular learning and qualification? How do we ensure that this does not erode the quality of care to patients? The SkillsFuture Leadership Development Initiative which aims to help aspiring Singaporeans acquire leadership competencies and critical experiences can attract more young Singaporeans to join the healthcare sector. As we welcome the initiative, how can it be extended to the healthcare sector as part of leadership development for healthcare workers? While offering more overseas training opportunities for nurses or allied healthcare professionals, how can we ensure that they return to Singapore to help build a stronger Singaporean Core with deeper capabilities? With abundant training opportunities and great growth potential for the professionals, managers and executives (PMEs) in the healthcare sector, I suggest for MOH to develop an academy for the healthcare sector to help in structuring training for workers. This will be a well-coordinated effort which standardises training beyond the basics and provides a one-stop centre for courses and skills advancement. With the support from MOM, the Employment and Employability Institute (e2i), NTUC Learning Hub and various IHL partnerships, the tripartite alliance academy for healthcare can help to meet the demand for a skilled workforce in the healthcare sector. One would also understand that the lack of manpower and the reliance on foreign workers are inevitable unless the healthcare sector transforms itself to improve productivity and innovation. Through this, many improvements were made over the last five years as we embark on automation and improve processes.”
“The Ministry and FJST will then work in close collaboration to tailor relevant training courses which are supported by the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) Education and Training Fund. To that, how can MOH facilitate the gathering and sharing of such data to best utilise funds for targeted training? With a greater demand for manpower in the ILTC sector, how can we enhance the attractiveness of jobs in the industry through better wages and career progression? Bearing in mind the ageing population's need for continued spending in acute care hospitals and the gradual cut in the Ministry's budget in the next two years, how can we manage the allocation of budget effectively? As the ILTC sector grows its manpower, how do we ensure a strong Singaporean Core? How can the SkillsFuture programmes allow more to be equipped with the necessary skills to enter the industry? There are many women in their 50s seeking employment and this can be a possible source of manpower to fill job vacancies in the ILTC sector. I believe that with the new Attach and Train programme as well as SkillsFuture funding support, we can better tap into this resource to address the manpower shortage issue. Nurses play a major role in our healthcare system. Besides the recommendations of the National Nursing Taskforce in 2014, does the Ministry have plans to develop the nursing workforce further? How can we further improve the Singaporean Core in the nursing profession? It is, indeed, encouraging to note that the Government supports modular and e-learning training. This is a step in the right direction. How would MOH regulate certification required of healthcare staff with the move towards modular and e-learning?”
“Madam, as Singapore faces challenges of an ageing population and as we move beyond the hospital to the community, how can we transform our healthcare workforce to realise this shift? There are several issues which I wish to highlight with some suggestions. First, the manpower issues in primary care and step-down care. At the last Budget, I suggested for VWOs or private organisations to run an alliance of step-down care institutions. By forming an association with ILTC organisations coordinated by AIC, the alliance can help bring these institutions up to speed with technology, improve their processes to become more manpower-lean, as well as develop career opportunities and advancement for their staff. With the growing need to address the intermediate and long-term needs of Singaporeans and to further strengthen our primary care sector via primary care network or community care services, the jobs of the future may well be from the ILTC sectors. With approximately 30,000 jobs to fill, how pervasive are the initiatives rolled out by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM), such as Professional Conversion Programme (PCP), Career Support Programme and how can we link step-down care institutions with jobseekers under the Attach and Train programme which is newly announced? The healthcare sector faces challenges filling the many job vacancies. I encourage MOH to work with the Labour Movement which has set up a Future Jobs, Skills and Training (FJST) department to identify emerging opportunities in the job market across various sectors. Together with employers, FJST will determine the necessary expertise and training workers will need to join the healthcare industry.”
“With regard to VWOs, how integrated in terms of systems are they in the social sector so that the case management of individuals that come for help is well taken care of? The second question is, have you considered shared services for certain operational admin services which VWOs, about 400 of them, require in commonality? These shared services can bring down the so-called operational costs. And the third question is: have we considered forming an association in the social sector for VWOs so that they can learn the best practices and even complement each other with the resources and exchange views?”
“The Disability Caregiver Support Centre is one promising initiative. I do hope that more can be done in assisting people with disabilities gain employment so that they can earn a dignified living. For this, we will need corporate organisations to support the employment of people with not just mild disability but also moderate disabilities. My personal experience working with people with disabilities has been a promising one. They are consistent, reliable and diligent; performing well in their given job scope. SG Enable has instituted programmes to create awareness among companies and conduct training for potential corporate organisations which show a keen interest in hiring people with disabilities. We must applaud such organisations for their willingness and pursuit to do good in Corporate Social Responsibility. With that in mind, I urge the Government to consider providing some wage support for companies hiring people with disabilities as a permanent employee, instead of offering them contract-based employment. This will give the individuals and their care-giving families more certainty and assurance. I am also heartened that, over the next five years, the Ministry will provide additional funding, up to $100 million in total, to further develop the capabilities of our VWOs and charities. In an effort to attract and retain talents, will the funding for VWOs-Charities Capability Fund be used to provide staff with training and better remuneration, especially for VWOs-Charities that provide some form of healthcare services? In this way, we can enhance the attractiveness of the sector, strengthen ability and build up the Singapore Core. Helping and Funding VWOs”
“Sir, I am heartened to note that there is more support for families with infants or children under 18 months of age. The Government's support for families, especially the Additional CPF Housing Grant for first-timer couples buying resale flats and the increase in capacity of centre-based infant care to 8,000 by 2020, is, indeed, welcomed. As we move towards a more caring and inclusive society, people with disabilities are also included in the Government's initiatives for lower income families, such as the U-Save rebates, to mitigate the increase in water tax. However, many sceptics doubt these measures are sufficient to moderate the cost of living and believe that consumers will take the brunt of the price increase. There is fear that cost increases can potentially spiral and this should be addressed in two prongs. First, to ensure that sellers are not exploiting and profiteering from the situation; and, second, to educate the people to be prudent in all aspects of their daily consumption. The sandwiched class is usually the most affected but given the least support. These are the mid-level professionals, managers and executives (PMEs) − the new vulnerable group of people, both in terms of securing employment and managing the family's cost of living. Perhaps the Government can provide more short-term support for this group, especially when the economic prospect looks bleak with lower employment rate. Next, I am glad that the Ministry will be doing more to help caregivers and assisting people with disabilities find work. The third Enabling Masterplan aims to better integrate people with disabilities into the workforce by giving more support to caregivers. This is the joint effort and initiative by the committee comprising both private and public sector representatives.”
“— of what we need to do and that protecting the environment is everybody's duty. Thank you, Madam.”
“It is important to educate Singaporeans on food that poses a negative impact on the environment. "The biggest intervention people could make towards reducing their carbon footprints is to eat significantly less red meat," said Prof Tim Benton at the University of Leeds. A research, led by scientists at the Oxford Martin School, found that shifting to a mostly vegetarian diet, or even simply cutting down meat consumption to within accepted health guidelines, would make a large dent in greenhouse gases. Adhering to health guidelines on meat consumption could cut global food-related emissions by nearly a third by 2050, while widespread adoption of a vegetarian diet would bring down emissions by 63%. Lastly, the eco-friendly award is a timely reminder —”
“Madam, regarding the recent announcement on carbon tax, though it is in the right direction to reduce carbon emissions it will, however, have an impact on the industries' financial sustainability and, ultimately the workers and consumers. Are there other measures that we can put in place to incentivise the individual firms to be prudent and compel them to use alternative sources of energy? With this tax, are we on track to meeting our commitment to lower carbon emissions? Has the Ministry explored other initiatives, considering the level of carbon emitted in our day-to-day life may have compounded the problem? Perhaps, the Ministry can consider further reviewing the following. One, creating greater awareness of the importance of addressing climate change and its implication on Singapore and its people. This can be done through schools, at workplaces and in public places with educational posters and documentary films, extensively promoting recycling, reducing or replacing the usage of plastics. This can be done by providing greater access and incentives for one to exchange empty bottles for coins − a practice found in Sweden. Pushing for consumers to bring their recyclable bags and not providing the alternative of plastic carrier bags could also be considered. It is the age-old culture that we need to reignite. About 19% of carbon emission comes from transportation. Can we do more in getting electric vehicles instead of petroleum cars to ply our roads if our effort to make Singaporeans switch to public transport remains a challenge? Can we better incentivise companies and individuals to encourage such efforts? The food we eat is what we are and what the environmental impact will be.”
“Madam, I have three clarifications. One is on mindset change. How prepared are our Statutory Boards, Government-linked companies and Civil Service in embracing or recognising modular training or e-learning by new job entrants? The second question is with regards SkillsFuture Credit. Have we done a gender-based analysis or properly analysed which are the courses that are predominantly taken by the female cohorts, compared to the male cohorts? The third question is: has the Ministry considered, in order to encourage more people to take up STEM courses, can we have a scholarship allocated for female students in the IHLs?”
“Madam, thank you. SkillsFuture Stocktake”
“We should also allow funding and subsidies to be extended to standard programmes of modular and e-learning curricula. Workers in employment who pursue programmes of such nature must be given equal opportunity for recognition, promotion and career progression. I trust the Government to also change the mindset of human resource professionals to be inclusive in their recruitment of job applicants with skills-based qualifications obtained through e-learning and short courses. Now, I wish to also speak on women in male-dominated sectors. Information and communications technology (ICT) is a fast-growing sector for Singapore. In 2015, only 43 women out of every 100 men enrolled in the information technology (IT) field for their first and higher degrees, and only 58 females for every 100 male students enrolled for the diploma courses. Does the Ministry have data to show a comparison on the usage of SkillsFuture Credits across gender? If so, is there any significant difference between the genders for ICT and STEM programmes? Does the Government also curate the courses to ensure that they are up to date and relevant, given the rapidly changing nature of technology? Have there been efforts to encourage women mid-career switchers who go for conversion programmes to consider STEM-related training? Can the Ministry consider allocating STEM scholarships for female students?”
“Madam, I welcome the various SkillsFuture initiatives that are implemented, such as the greater support for modular and e-learning and training. What more can be done to encourage both the young and mature Singaporeans to embrace modular training and e-learning? How can we persuade more Singaporeans to embrace lifelong learning? How long will it take to change our people's mindset and for them to see the importance of equipping themselves with the relevant skills? How prepared is the Civil Service sector in recognising qualifications attained through modular courses and e-learning curricula? Are employers ready to acknowledge new job entrants with skills qualifications obtained through e-learning? How do we change both employers' and employees' mindset to accept such training as a way of life for Singaporeans to keep pace with the changing skills needs of the economy and achieve skills mastery? To see a significant change in the mindset of employers, I urge the Civil Service and the Government-linked companies to initiate and lead by example. In the healthcare sector, too, there should be pervasive modular training and e-learning modules for support staff to strive to upgrade themselves for career progressions. However, as more take on skills-based programmes, the professional regulatory bodies must stand prepared to review the current programmes and provide greater accessibility to modular training and e-learning. To prevent "a spiraling paper chase" and producing a workforce which excels in exams but are ill-equipped to take on jobs of the future, there is a need for our society to move away from exam-based assessment and provide greater emphasis on practical training.”
“For some sectors like nursing, it takes 24 months to train a person. It would be worthwhile to consider extending this wage support beyond that.”
“Madam, I have got three questions. One, is on work trial extension. Basically, I would like to ask the Minister whether he would consider a work trial for our PMETs who want to look at other industries before they switch over permanently. So, it would be worthwhile looking at it. The second question I have is with regard to PCP. For some of the programmes, the training is beyond 18 months. For instance, nursing is 24 months for someone who is not in the industry at all. Can the wage support or some form of support be given to these people and the industries that are taking them? This will help, especially the Intermediate and Long-Term Care sector, which is taking in nurses who want to switch over from one industry to another? The third question is on HR professionals. I remember MOM stating that there will be a HR framework and to make sure that the HR professionals are up to skill and professionalism. When will this be rolled out?”
“However, as women live longer, it would be worthy to drill further down the concerns of mature women and their needs as they age beyond 60, whether or not they are in employment.”
“Madam, I must applaud the tremendous effort of MOM in helping Singaporeans who are retrenched, in search of jobs, and looking to switch industries through various schemes, such as PCP, CSP and the latest Attach and Train Programme. The new Attach and Train programme allows workers to join companies for training attachments and the firms do not have to hire them. This is unlike the traditional Place and Train scheme where workers are trained after they have been hired for jobs. This way, workers can still stand a chance to be trained on the job and gain experience while trying out new sectors. As much as we welcome the programme, how can we ensure that students or workers on the programme are remunerated fairly and can be placed in a job after the training? Does the labour law protect such workers? Next, I wish to further call upon the Ministry to do more for "mumpreneurs" who would appreciate flexible work arrangements (FWAs), such as working from home. Perhaps the Government can consider providing grants or tax reductions for costs in setting up and running of home offices for this group of women entrepreneurs? Now, I wish to speak on re-entry and re-employment of women and having enough in their nest egg for their old age. Based on the CPF Board's report in 2013, there seems to be a significant improvement in women's CPF balances. However, this analysis was done with women aged 25-54. For the elderly aged 55 and above, they may lack savings and rely greatly on contributions by family members and assistance from the Government. Can informal jobs, such as caregiving within the family and friends, be incentivised in terms of Government MediSave top-ups? The tripartite approach to address age management and employment concerns is, indeed, commendable.”
“Will the Government consider working with the Labour Movement to explore ways to assist these affected workers leverage programmes, such as the "Adapt and Grow" programme, and transit into new employment before the company winds down? These workers can plan and start to upskill and reskill to enhance their employability earlier. All the Government's support and assistance should be directed to sunrise companies or future-ready companies with potential for growth. Will the Government evaluate the situation and circumstances in which SMEs are given assistance to ensure accountability? Helping Micro and Heartland Enterprises”
“Chairman, the Budget has a slew of extensive targeted measures to support industries and companies in their medium- to long-term effort to improve their businesses' productivity and performances. Last year, MOF provided greater help to SMEs, such as more corporate income tax rebate and the extension of the Special Employment Credit scheme. This year, there are even more targeted help for SMEs to improve their efficiency and go international and digital, with a focus on data analytics and cybersecurity. In light of this, has the Ministry tracked and monitored the performances of SMEs which received assistance last year? Has the outcome been encouraging? Will MTI provide a progress report showing which sectors have benefited and shown improvement and which, despite all measures and assistance, have yet to yield any results? From the latest MTI report, besides the construction sector, the retail sector seems to have one of the lowest in productivity. What measures can be taken to improve this sector's productivity? In regard to the Government's Enabling Growth and Innovation measures, besides providing financial support, can the Government take on a greater role in supporting SMEs in their overseas ventures by helping them leverage its network? The Minister earlier alluded to their effort in doing so, but probably we can be more pervasive in this effort. With today's economy, many SMEs may need more handholding to sustain themselves. Despite all the financial assistance rendered by the Government, some SMEs may end up winding down their businesses and the workers will be adversely affected.”
“Are there enhancements extended to existing CPF Housing Grant for couples buying Build-To-Order flats? Lastly, I applaud the Government's Budget inclusion for the expansion of infant care centres. Such support will enable younger women to stay in the labour market after childbirth and, for those who had stopped working, a reason to return to work. This is where the employers, those working alongside with them and the entire nation can show better understanding and support to these groups of women who often face challenges raising children. Madam, notwithstanding the above, I support the Budget that is promising and exciting, to build a formidable economy and create good jobs for Singaporeans.”
“Should there be a gradual increase over a period instead? Can there be a systematic way or formula for increasing water price so that it is less painful for Singaporeans? Moreover, the increase would mean some sellers or outlets may take advantage of the circumstances by increasing food and drink prices, amongst many others. I would strongly urge the Consumers Association of Singapore to help keep tab on this and act swiftly to normalise such behaviour. As for social enterprises of the Labour Movement, I believe that they will, as always, act to moderate the price increases to safeguard consumers from being exploited by those who often cite a compounded cost increase in the supply chain as an excuse. One other industry that would see such impact is the healthcare sector. Will such increase result in an increase in the cost of healthcare services to Singaporeans? Because in healthcare, we use a lot of water for every step of the procedure. I hope the respective Ministries will not pass on the cost increases to its consumers. Also, with the increase in water price, will employers use this as a reason to reduce wage increases as well as bonus payouts? With regard to U-Save rebates, perhaps the Government can consider having different subsidies for multi-generation flats and executive flats, instead of grouping them together and providing them with the same amount of assistance. This is because people living in multi-generation flats get the least U-Save rebates amongst other flat types when many are living as three-generation family units with elderly parents or grandparents and may require more assistance and support from the Government. Enhancement of the CPF Housing Grant for resale flats encourages young families to buy resale flats.”
“I also welcome the SkillsFuture Leadership Development Initiative to develop 800 potential Singaporeans for exposure to international jobs that are well-paying. As we welcome this, to avoid the situation of talent shortage, the Government could work with companies on job redesigning and rebranding of industries and jobs to attract more locals and Singaporeans working abroad to come back and work at home. It was also announced that all Ministries would have a 2% cut and that the Health, Home Affairs and Defence Ministries will have a 2% cut in phases. Which part of the expenditure will the 2% cut come from? As manpower is often the big ticket expenditure of any organisation, will this cut affect the workers' jobs and salaries? Is it the right time to cut the budget for all Ministries, especially for Health, while we are confronted with challenges of an ageing society; and for Home Affairs and Defence with the increasing threat of terrorism globally? Will there be a fee increase passed down to Singaporeans consequently? I wish to now touch on cost of living. It is notable that for both the diesel cost increase and 30% increase in water conservation tax, the Government has put in place mitigating measures for low-income families. It is, indeed, heartening to see several schemes made available to families to cope with the cost of living. However, Singaporeans, especially the middle-class families, will feel the brunt of these increases. Therefore, short-term help for such families would be welcomed, especially when companies are expected to be prudent with wage increases and bonuses. In fact, more should be done to help these middle-income families. Some Singaporeans questioned the sudden huge increase in water price. I think the Minister has explained earlier.”
“Mdm Speaker, I welcome this year's forward-looking Budget. It contains several initiatives to support and assist the growth of our economy by strengthening the industry sectors under the ITMs for 23 industry sectors through the tripartite alliance and partnership. The aim is to identify jobs of the future and preparing and equipping our workforce in deepening their skills, improving productivity with technology and automation, embracing innovation for better business opportunities and business sustainability, and providing market opportunities for internationalisation of businesses, especially for SMEs. This is understandable as SMEs employ two-thirds of the workforce today. However, with targeted budget allocation and the introduction of both existing and new schemes, how do we ensure that these SMEs create better jobs for our Singaporeans? How many of such jobs are future-ready? To what extent will they succeed in improving productivity and, if so, where is the check and balance that SMEs will share the gains with the workers that thereafter translates into sustainable wage increases or profit sharing? Some SMEs or companies are barely keeping themselves afloat with the funding support provided by the Government. Should these SMEs continue to suffer and prolong its losses, their workers will be adversely affected. With this in mind, the Government can perhaps work with the Labour Movement to explore ways to assist these potentially affected workers leverage programmes, such as the Adapt and Grow programme, and transit into new employment before the company winds down. These workers can plan and start to upskill and reskill to enhance their employability.”
“Madam, the Bill seeks to regulate the operation of early childhood development centres. It contains the regulatory framework for operators of early childhood development centres. It provides the approval framework for those performing the duties and approval framework for third-party education providers. The Bill is also a timely and forward-looking one as it takes effect with the repeal of the Childcare Centres Act. Madam, I would like to seek the following clarifications in regard to the Bill. Section 3 states that the Bill does not apply to certain centres. Why does this Bill not apply to preschools run by the Government, such as the MOE kindergartens? Should it not be that standards be applied to both the Government and privately-run preschools? Section 17 spells out the directions concerning the safety and well-being of children. Thus, the licensee who fails to comply will be imposed a fine of up to $10,000 or not exceeding 12 months' imprisonment. How does an agency make sure that every licensee complies with the directions and not wait until someone whistle-blows or complains? Section 23 states the approval for performance of and deployment of individuals to perform prescribed duties. Preschool teachers play an important role in detecting developmental issues among children. Will there be training for teachers in caring for children with special needs? Also, the Bill does not provide much reference or guide on the qualifications and experience required for such teachers. What other fees or charges are to be paid in respect of the services and other areas mentioned in section 51 under "Regulations"? Madam, notwithstanding these, I rise in support of the Bill.”
“Madam, I rise in support of the Bill. The Bill sets out the general qualifications and requirements for architect registration. It brings about improvements to safeguard the interests of both the architects providing the service and the clients who sought their services. Essentially, the amendment to the Bill allows for the recognition of architect qualification and standards with the arrangement between the BOA and those territories or countries outside Singapore. This will, indeed, open up more opportunities for these professionals and allow them to extend their expertise and services overseas with fewer hurdles. At this stage, I wish to seek the following clarification on the amendments. In regard to section 4C, if a tie occurs in the voting for the President of BOA, how will the tie be decided? Section 11(2), which explains the recovery of payment from the architect, how can a person recover the amount paid to an unauthorised architect? Will he/she have to file a civil suit to recover his/her money? As stated in section 31(k), will the appointed investigator be allowed to authorise or appoint a team of support for the investigation work? And which Ministry oversees this Act? Section 15A, which is a new section that spells out the recognition of registered architects in any participating jurisdiction, is this restricted to foreign architects to obtain any of the qualifications listed in the BOA website? And importantly, how do we preserve the standards of overseas architects who are practising in Singapore vis-a-vis the Singapore architects?”
“Madam, I have two supplementary questions. One, on the role of community pharmacists. A lot of times, in the GP clinics, the highest cost burden for the patient is the prescription cost, medication cost. Is the Ministry considering expanding the role of community pharmacists where pharmacists are given the prescribing rights, as well as are able to provide cost-effective medication to the patients? The second question is: will the Minister consider having survey outcomes listed on the website for GPs who provide medication for general common ailments and how much they charge the patients?”