Keith Chua
Singapore
“I thank the Senior Minister of State for the response to suicide prevention. In a PQ I filed last year, the response advised that there is no tracking or cumulative data collated of the number of persons diagnosed with suicidal ideation, whether caused by mental health conditions or other triggers.”
“Enterprise Singapore has a comprehensive set of schemes to help enterprises in their internationalisation efforts. Amid the uncertain global economic environment including emerging protectionism, what are MTI's plans to ensure the schemes remain relevant in supporting local enterprises with the potential and desire to internationalise and…”
“Mr Chairman, MTI and EnterpriseSG launched the Heartland Enterprise Placemaking Grant in 2024. Could MTI provide an update on the response to this grant from the merchants and how many applications have been received and how many have been approved.”
“Mr Chairman, businesses need to continue to manage costs efficiently, especially in a competitive environment. As mentioned by Members previously, can MTI provide an update on the the IMC for Pro-Enterprise Rules Review and the SME Pro-Enterprise Office (PEO). Specifically, what are the key areas that have been most helpful for SMEs?”
“Mr Chairman, the Minister recently announced the establishment of a task force to help sustain and grow heritage businesses. While some heritage businesses continue to flourish, many have decided to exit permanently owing to economic pressures, rising costs, lower consumer demand and also succession issues.”
“Mr Chairman, scams continue to be a pressing concern in our digital age. As technology evolves, so do the tactics of scammers, who increasingly exploit messaging apps and social media to deceive victims. Despite ongoing public awareness efforts and enhanced security measures, scams continue to remain persistent and a costly issue.”
The complete record
Every one of 105 lines we hold for Keith Chua, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 1 of 3.
“Mr Chairman, whether we look back 60 years or longer, we will find many threads of generosity and philanthropy in our shared history. It was not just among the wealthy and higher income, though many did give generously, but giving was across all income and social levels. I have often referred to Singapore as a generous society in past speeches. In the last couple of decades, we have seen philanthropy grow as more and more individuals and families give back to society. We can and should continue to encourage philanthropy and giving. I thank the Prime Minister for including initiatives in this year's Budget to encourage the spirit of giving, including the option to donate the SG60 vouchers to charity. Singapore continues to develop as a philanthropic hub for local and international giving. Could we get an update on existing initiatives and schemes to support the broader charity and non-profit sectors? In particular, are we seeing an increase in support for arts, heritage, culture and sports? Are there plans that will build regional giving that will leverage on public and private sector collaboration? The provision of $600 million in matching funds will be a helpful boost for the non-profit sector. How will this be channelled to areas or services of greatest need? Will all charities be favourably considered in benefiting from the matching funds, and are there measures to ensure that this matching grant to the three platforms will not result in donors redirecting funds away from the existing flow of donations directly to charities?”
“Mr Chairman, the social service sector has come a long way in the past few decades, maturing in professional standing and practices. Many more dedicated individuals have joined the social services as demand has grown in all areas. New initiatives continue to be launched to meet the evolving needs as we work toward ensuring that no one is left behind. I would like to declare my role on the boards of SSAs. Our sector continues to be heavily reliant on the constant inflow of professional staff and allied health workers. Many SSAs require a percentage of foreign staff to fill a variety of roles. We are training more social workers in our institutes of higher learning in anticipation of current and future needs. With our new social compact, I hope many more Singaporeans will see the social service sector as one that will present opportunity for a fulfilling career. In the past, salaries in the sector trailed behind jobs in most other industry groups. Steps have been in place for many years to uplift pay scales with Government support as many service providers are charities. In labour-tight Singapore, how might the social service sector continue to attract, nurture and retain talent beyond just better wages? At the sectoral level, how might we keep pace with societal changes and evolve to continue to serve Singapore society well? Will the Minister consider actively building a pool of trained volunteers in key areas of need to complement the full-time professional teams? As we see jobs in some commercial sectors reduce, can we actively retrain displaced workers to take up jobs in the social service sector? Future-directed Social Service Sector”
“I thank the Senior Minister of State for the response to suicide prevention. In a PQ I filed last year, the response advised that there is no tracking or cumulative data collated of the number of persons diagnosed with suicidal ideation, whether caused by mental health conditions or other triggers. Will MOH reconsider the current position, now that we have the National Mental Health Office, as this monitoring or tracking should be helpful in suicide prevention and, perhaps, more importantly, the provision of resources required for the support of these individuals? We should do all within our means to prevent the next suicide.”
“Countries with comprehensive postvention support, such as England and South Korea, find that the continuity of care for suicide survivors and those close to them are essential to preventing further suicide attempts. Support for Mental Well-being In last year's COS debate, the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth updated that there were 12 Well-Being Circles as part of the SG Mental Well-Being Network and more than 3,000 people have been supported. These initiatives are designed to help prevent the development of mental health conditions for all Singaporeans as part of the Tiered Care Model. In the White Paper I mentioned earlier proposing a national strategy for suicide prevention, one key recommendation is to involve families and communities in such efforts. This includes strengthening collaborations with religious and community leaders, and the continuity of care for suicide survivors as well as families, friends and communities affected by suicide. May I ask the following? How does the Ministry measure the efficacy of community mental health efforts, such as the Well-Being Circles and peer support circles? Will the Ministry ensure that every Singaporean has access to such community initiatives? And thirdly, Will the Ministry plan to leverage such community initiatives to ensure the continuity of care for suicide survivors and others affected by suicide? Mental Health First Aid Resources”
“Madam, suicide prevention requires a whole-of-society approach, given that not everyone who presents with suicidal behaviours has a mental health condition. The working group for Project Hayat presented its recommendations for a national suicide prevention strategy, per the S.A.V.E. L.I.V.E.S. framework to the Government. Madam, I am a member of the Working Group and Board member of the Singapore Anglican Community Services and Caring for Life. In his response to Project Hayat, the Minister for Health agrees we can do more in areas like research, the use of AI technology and means-restriction. I would like to ask the Minister the following questions, please. How will the National Mental Health Office work in the area of suicide prevention? Will the National Mental Health Office establish KPIs specific to seeing a reduction in the number of suicides? Will the National Mental Health Office take the lead in further policy-making across various Ministries and agencies, such as setting up a national suicide prevention framework? Will the office consider going beyond the current framework centred on clinical services and mental health interventions outlined under the Tiered Care Model, and put in place systemic interventions targeted at suicide prevention? For example, ensuring there is a holistic strategy addressing societal pressures and taking into account protective factors at each life stage from children to teenagers, to young adults and to the elderly? Lastly, how will the Office ensure adequate postvention support for individuals and families, that is, care provided following a suicide attempt?”
“We must ensure that every Singaporean can access, use and benefit from technology securely and confidently.”
“Chairman, digitisation is transforming the way we live, work and interact. From e-payments to telemedicine and digital Government services, technology has become a cornerstone of our daily life. As Singapore advances, we must ensure that every Singaporean, regardless of age, ability or background, can confidently navigate the online space without fear of exclusion or exploitation. Our digital future must be built on inclusivity, empowerment and safety. While many have adapted, others remain digitally vulnerable and lack digital confidence. These include seniors struggling with e-services and persons with physical and mental disabilities. IMDA announced a strategic collaboration involving over 300 partners under the National Digital for Life Movement to help advance Singaporeans' essential digital skills. These efforts are commendable and instrumental in closing the digital divide. But more needs to be done to reach underserved communities. A report by the Ministry of Social and Family Development has highlighted the need for design and technological solutions to promote independent living among persons with disabilities. I would like to ask the Ministry how would ongoing digital initiatives ensure mass access so that no one is left behind? How can we scale efforts to further bridge the digital divide? What strategies are in place to empower citizens with the skills and confidence to use technology safely and effectively? How are we ensuring accessibility across all digital platforms, particularly for persons with disabilities? How are we strengthening public awareness of online threats, ensuring that Singaporeans can identify and protect themselves against digital risks? An inclusive, safe and digitally empowered society is not just a goal. It is a necessity.”
“Mr Chairman, MTI and EnterpriseSG launched the Heartland Enterprise Placemaking Grant in 2024. Could MTI provide an update on the response to this grant from the merchants and how many applications have been received and how many have been approved. Based on activities and events organised thus far, how has the response been from residents and the wider community? Have merchants benefited from increased footfall and business growth? Key to all business is staying relevant and competitive. The alternatives, such as large malls located in the heartlands, also draw significant footfall. Will there be regular reviews to ensure this scheme achieves the intended outcomes? Tourism 2040”
“Enterprise Singapore has a comprehensive set of schemes to help enterprises in their internationalisation efforts. Amid the uncertain global economic environment including emerging protectionism, what are MTI's plans to ensure the schemes remain relevant in supporting local enterprises with the potential and desire to internationalise and grow? From the recent efforts in internationalisation, which sectors have fared well and continue to show scope for more companies to consider? From the recent efforts, have there been useful lessons that may benefit companies contemplating internationalisation given the increasingly crowded local domestic market in sectors, such as retail and food and beverage? Will local lenders look favourably on funding internationalisation for local enterprises? Internationalisation”
“Mr Chairman, businesses need to continue to manage costs efficiently, especially in a competitive environment. As mentioned by Members previously, can MTI provide an update on the the IMC for Pro-Enterprise Rules Review and the SME Pro-Enterprise Office (PEO). Specifically, what are the key areas that have been most helpful for SMEs? What has the feedback from SMEs been so far? Are we seeing positive response by SMEs in accessing the services? Will new SMEs also find the PEO beneficial? Innovation, Growth and Sustainability”
“Mr Chairman, the Minister recently announced the establishment of a task force to help sustain and grow heritage businesses. While some heritage businesses continue to flourish, many have decided to exit permanently owing to economic pressures, rising costs, lower consumer demand and also succession issues. Could the Ministry and URA elaborate on the plans to support heritage businesses in the short and longer term? In particular, how can we help those where the next generation is committed to carry on but may need support in some areas? Heritage businesses are a part of our shared history. As a community, we can all play our part by patronising heritage businesses. Safe and Efficient Last-mile Deliveries”
“Mr Chairman, since launching the Singapore Land Authority's (SLAs') Reinventing Spaces into Vibrant Places (RSVP) programme, could the Minister kindly advise whether properties have been successfully awarded and, if so, how many? Are any of the properties currently in use by the successful tenants? Are there any properties scheduled for launch in the coming year and, if so, when will be the timing of this launch? Will the decision for additional properties under this programme be solely determined by SLA and the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA)? In evaluating the interest generated in the programme thus far, can the Ministry advise whether the interest for state land is still leaning towards the more conventional method as there seems to be many more sites listed for tender under this method? Would there be favourable consideration by SLA for proposals from non-profit groups and organisations, given the increase in interest for arts, culture and heritage? Some community service organisations may find use of state properties as an option to better connect with the community. Is SLA open to such proposals? As an example, creative use of a property may enable it to be a welcoming touchpoint for persons to find out more about difficult topics, such as mental health or other conditions like anxiety or depression. Use of appropriate sites may also appeal to the seniors, especially if the property has an interesting history. It may be helpful for happy memories. Optimising State Assets via Technology”
“Mr Chairman, there are many avenues for our small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to grow both locally and internationally. There are also many helpful grants and different areas of financing support available. However, many of our SMEs may not be aware of the opportunity to unlock value of their intangible assets and IP rights. Successful businesses should ensure that they protect their brand value. This may also open up avenues for access to finance. How can IPOS support SMEs in this area? Has IPOS worked with trade associations and chambers (TACs) to better reach Singapore SMEs? Singapore as Arbitration Hub Mr Chairman, Singapore has established herself as one of the leading places for international arbitration. Recent reports suggest that Singapore has become the leading arbitration hub. There are many accompanying benefits ranging from professional to economic. However, there is also keen competition from other cities. May I ask the Minister what steps are we taking and what steps can we be taking to deepen the attraction of Singapore as an arbitration hub? With the many global and technological changes more recently, including a more protective and uncertain world, how might this affect our efforts? In-house Counsels and Para-legals”
“Mr Chairman, scams continue to be a pressing concern in our digital age. As technology evolves, so do the tactics of scammers, who increasingly exploit messaging apps and social media to deceive victims. Despite ongoing public awareness efforts and enhanced security measures, scams continue to remain persistent and a costly issue. Given the ease with which scammers infiltrate these platforms, it is crucial that we ensure a strong and coordinated response. I would like to therefore ask MHA how cooperative have messaging apps and social media platforms been in combating scams? What measures are in place to enhance collaboration with these platforms to swiftly detect and disrupt scam operations? How are social media and messaging platforms being held accountable for scam activities on their networks?”
“Okay. Our charities, both large and small, continue to form part of our social support network, providing daily care to many beneficiaries. Many smaller charities will find funding a continuing challenge. Smaller charities will be essential to address gaps as we work towards the objective of caring for everyone who needs help. I hope the three groups mentioned by the Prime Minister, the Community Chest, the Collective for a Stronger Society and the President's Challenge will find ways to channel this increase in resources to some of the smaller charities who will be essential in ensuring that no one is left behind. We are an increasingly caring and generous society. The multiplier effect when everyone who can, gives, will be extraordinary. I hope future Budgets will continue to nurture the spirit of giving and see greater collaboration between public and private initiatives that will ensure that no one is left behind. Mdm Deputy Speaker, I support Budget 2025.”
“Just like our nation, this will have taken time, most likely decades of tireless efforts of dedicated individuals and the supporters, including Government and private donors —”
“Support schools and educators and, here, more specifically, to adolescents: establish suicide prevention protocols in schools for suicide prevention, crisis response and postvention support. In focus group discussions conducted under Project Hayat, participants have expressed concern that school staff, counsellors and teachers may be insufficiently equipped to provide psychological support or conduct suicide risk assessments for students in need. It was also found that many educators may lack the necessary training to identify warning signs, manage crises or intervene effectively in suicide-related situations, leaving a critical gap in the support network for vulnerable students. By developing and implementing clear protocols and comprehensive training programmes, schools can ensure that educators, school counsellors and students are better prepared to respond to suicide risks. And this would involve equipping school staff with the tools to recognise early signs of distress, intervene appropriately, and provide ongoing support to students facing mental health challenges. Mdm Deputy Speaker, as this is a Budget for all Singaporeans, we must continue to find ways to adequately support the many vulnerable groups where these are not yet in place. I have covered those with mental health conditions, persons with disability and special needs, caregivers and proposed for more to be done to prevent suicide. We will need to work together, Government and society, to ensure no one is left behind. I would like to conclude on the spirit of giving and the increased support in the Budget to encourage a generous society. Many large charities today started small.”
“Involving individuals who belong to communities at greater risk of suicide, survivors of suicide, and those who have lived experiences of suicide is essential in bridging gaps in suicide prevention. We need to value data and research: investing in research on the upstream determinants of suicide amongst the vulnerable groups, and to conduct further research to determine additional priority groups in Singapore. There is a strong link between upstream factors and social determinants that heighten suicide risks among vulnerable groups and those who are experiencing loneliness or hopelessness in their lives. More research is required on priority populations that are at greater risk of mental health challenges, self-injury or suicide and to develop evidence-based interventions that are tailored for these respective communities. Another recommendation is to involve families and communities: strengthening family support initiatives to manage mental health and suicide prevention, and strengthening collaboration with religious and community leaders. Family-focused programmes should be developed to equip families with the knowledge and skills to recognise early signs of distress, facilitate open and supportive communication, and offer practical strategies to assist loved ones facing mental health struggles. As trusted figures within communities, religious and community leaders hold significant influence and are often seen as sources of support and guidance, making them well-positioned to promote mental health awareness and reduce the stigma surrounding suicide. Leaders can foster an environment of compassion, understanding and acceptance to reduce stigma, as well as play a key role in identifying individuals at risk and providing timely support.”
“The researchers, therefore, hypothesised that the unique situation of working abroad may increase non-residents’ vulnerability in general, while adverse life events, such as relationship and health issues, may be too overwhelming to bear, especially when support services are not readily available and accessible. The third vulnerable group identified in this White Paper, the neurodiverse population, I will just share an anecdote from the parents who lost their child who had autism spectrum disorder (ASD) to suicide and recounted this in the focus group discussions: “I don’t think he can understand why he cannot seem to get along as well with other children as maybe his classmates can, so I think there’s also the feeling of rejection…. I always thought that if he had managed to live to COVID, perhaps he would still be alive, because we are all just in our safe little space, he doesn't have to go out and socialise. I always wish that he had that two extra years, [it] just didn’t happen.” Three other vulnerable groups identified in the White Paper include the elderly, caregivers and lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBTQ) community. Recommendations for vulnerable groups in the White Paper include strengthening governance and policy, involving communities of people at risk of suicide and those with lived experience of suicide in all aspects of policymaking and implementation of suicide prevention policies. A key feature of suicide prevention efforts across the world is to ensure that people who have been affected by suicide are involved in all aspects of suicide prevention, including policymaking, implementation, research and advocacy.”
“I understand the Government has provided an initial response to the White Paper through the Minster for Health. The paper identified several vulnerable groups. I will expand on three of these groups. First, the youths and adolescents as a vulnerable group. According to data from SOS, as mentioned earlier, suicide remains the leading cause of death for nearly 30% of young people aged between 10 and 29 over the last five consecutive years. This is until 2023. Based on a study of 221 patients aged between 10 and 19 who were presented to hospitals’ emergency departments for suicidal or self-harm attempts in 2021, not all adolescents at risk of self-harm and suicidal behaviours have serious mental health disorders but, instead, have psychosocial problems and emotional regulation difficulties. Of these, only 48.4% of the patients studied had ongoing psychiatric or psychological support. More than half of the patients had “ambivalent intent”, that is, confused about whether they truly wanted to end their own lives, which highlights impulsivity and the lack of emotional regulation. The study found a predominance of female patients, in this case, 85.5% over male patients. Hence, focusing on risk factors for females, such as eating disorders and past history of self-harm, can inform risk management strategies in schools and in communities. Second, migrant workers as a vulnerable group. In a 2021 study of non-resident suicides which occurred in Singapore between 2011 and 2014, it was found that most resident suicide cases did not have a known physical or mental health issue, prior to suicide attempts or suicide notes. Based on the analyses of available suicide notes, relationship and health problems emerged as the top two suspected triggers for suicide.”
“Suicide is tragic and a most painful encounter, whether by family, friends or communities. In 2023, based on statistics from the Samaritans of Singapore, we lost 322 lives to suicide. It is the leading cause of death for those aged between 10 and 29. There is also the increased risk of suicide amongst the elderly. Suicide cuts across all age groups and all strata of society. One suicide affects many, many others, including family, friends and communities. There are many who attempt suicide and need support. Families and friends who care for individuals with suicidal ideation also need support and help. Project Hayat is a community-led effort guided by a work group comprising policymakers, suicide experts, researchers, community workers and helping professionals, religious leaders, corporate leaders, representatives from the media, and people whose lives have been impacted by suicide. Project Hayat presented a White Paper to the Government in late-September 2024 covering 23 recommendations for a national suicide prevention strategy in Singapore under the S.A.V.E.L.I.V.E.S framework, using the acronym, each highlighting a specific course of action. The research conducted for the White Paper included direct interviews with key stakeholders from countries with national suicide prevention strategies, such as Indonesia and South Korea; focus group discussions with people in Singapore who have been directly and indirectly affected by suicide, including parents, youths, educators, first responders, healthcare and emergency services personnel, religious leaders, media representatives; and the first phase of public consultation with more than 500 respondents sharing their views on suicide and suicide prevention.”
“Would the Government reconsider the position for support for persons in recovery both by way of some form of disability allowance or support during treatment and rehabilitation when they are unable to work and be gainfully employed, particularly if their financial situation warrants such support? In addition, would the Government reconsider support for employers of persons in recovery in ways similar to the Enabling Employment Credit and SG Enable grants as it relates to persons diagnosed with a mental health condition? And here I would just like to add my appreciation to many employers who are already providing this support by employing persons in recovery. In some cases, the mental illness may be so debilitating that these individuals require a very long recovery time. Can we better support them, so no one is left behind? This Budget continues the advocacy for lifelong learning. Should we take a closer look at the options and consider where we may need to tailor these for vulnerable groups so that they, too, can benefit? Persons with intellectual disability or autism may need tailored courses in their adult life. Some may need to, or desire to, to reskill. I hope we will provide these options, especially where the levels of learning may need to be moderated. In other words, Mdm Deputy Speaker, may I suggest we provide or expand appropriate skills and other courses for these special groups? I am pleased to see the inclusion in the support of caregivers. I hope we will comb through all caregivers progressively and comprehensively and, over time, give them the necessary support. Mdm Deputy Speaker, I would now like to address the issue of suicide prevention and support for individuals and families affected by suicide.”
“Similarly, Budget 2025, with extensive immediate support initiatives and significant longer-term investment for our future, is forecast to end with another surplus of $6.8 billion. This year’s forecast surplus is extremely helpful to navigate local and global uncertainties should the need arise. Mdm Speaker, we continue to look at measures to support all Singaporeans and work toward the commitment that no one is left behind. May I declare my interest as a board member of two social service agencies in mental health services, suicide prevention and also on a working group on Project Hayat. Budget 2025 will enable many to continue to thrive and, at the same time, move others forward to not just survive, but also to thrive. Nevertheless, we need to recognise there remain vulnerable groups that our current and future policies need to address. Let me start with persons with disabilities and special needs, including autism. This Budget provides for avenues of support for such persons post-18 years of age and, more specifically, in the area of employment. However, we must also find avenues for those who may not be in a position to work. These individuals also deserve to have access to an acceptable level of quality of life. It would not be appropriate to see them as a burden to society just because they may not be considered economically productive. Persons with mental illness are also a broad vulnerable group. Much has been debated in this House on mental health and well-being and the many interventions we have and continue to introduce. In previous speeches, I have put to this House specific consideration for better employment support for persons in recovery from mental illness.”
“Mdm Speaker, in his Budget Speech, the Prime Minister reminded us of how far we have come as a nation since our Independence 60 years ago. We have moved from third world to first world and we have seen our economy improve from a state of bare survival to one of resilience. Most of us have our basic needs met in housing, education, healthcare and employment. Despite the continuing global and external uncertainties, we are well positioned to face these challenges together. Our multiracial and multi-religious society remains cohesive and harmonious and we continue to enjoy political stability, peace and security despite external tensions. We must treasure all this and preserve what has taken decades to build. I described last year’s Budget under three broad themes. Firstly, being faithful in stewarding our limited resources from our fledgling state and seeing this steadily grow to our current levels. In Budget 2025, we continue fiscal prudence and good stewardship. Secondly, continuing to introduce measures and initiatives that were directly targeted at taking care of the welfare of our people, which also includes our foreign workers in our midst. In Budget 2025, we enhance help for many groups. Thirdly, being a blessing to one another, sharing as we ourselves have been blessed and how we have also shared beyond our borders. In Budget 2025, we enhance the spirit of giving. Budget 2025 continues the path forward, deepening and strengthening many areas covered from last year's Budget. It is commendable that we managed to achieve much through last year's Budget and still end the fiscal year 2024 with an estimated surplus of $6.4 billion.”
“As we will need to bridge this phase together, could the Minister kindly update us whether there will be further assistance considered for the producers as they transition toward a sustainable business level? Also, will food operators who support local suppliers be considered for some form of support or subsidy until suppliers can reach economies of scale and, therefore, become more price competitive? Mr Speaker, Sir, notwithstanding these clarifications, I support this Bill.”
“It is clear that home-based food business must adhere to proper food safety practices and will be subject to enforcement should lapses occur. It would, therefore, be helpful for food-based operators to access courses on best practices relating to food safety and hygiene. This is currently not mandatory. Whether the food business requires a licence or is exempt, it would certainly be in the interest of the operator to observe proper safety standards for the business to thrive. The Bill seeks to streamline some of the processes and also reduce compliances costs for food businesses that do require licensing. This is welcome news for an industry facing many areas of cost increases. Food operators should remain responsible in ensuring that the food safety standards are not diminished. On the matter of food security. Food security is in our national interest. We are currently progressing toward our goal of producing 30% of our annual requirements by 2030. Food businesses are prepared to play an increasing part in providing demand for local produce by including locally-sourced or grown products in the primary ingredients. Similarly, consumers are also willing to switch to local produce to bring the local supply chain to financially sustainable levels. While some food operators have introduced successful farm to table or farm to fork concepts, these tend to be at the higher price end. For operators whose concepts fall more in the mass market, or middle or lower price end, there are possibly two factors currently limiting the switch to local produce. One is the matter of price as local produce will compete with produce from other sources of supply. The other is the ability to supply in sufficient quantities.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, firstly, I would like to declare I am an office bearer at the Restaurant Association of Singapore and also chairing a food service business. Food safety practices have contributed to the success of food-based businesses in Singapore. Singaporeans, residents and visitors can be assured that operators are required, by law, to observe standards and practices that ensure all food sold is safe for consumption. While the barrier to entry for establishing a food business is low, the basic licensing requirements hold operators responsible and accountable. The only exception would be home-based food businesses which fall outside current licensing requirements. The rationale to exclude home-based food business from requiring licensing relates to the scale of operations, being a smaller scale operation and, therefore, the resulting lower risk in the area of food safety issues. Home-based food business is a helpful means, both as primary and supplementary sources of income. It encourages entrepreneurship. It also presents a low-cost means to test out whether a food and beverage concept or model is viable. I am glad the Government agencies continue to keep a light touch on this group of operators. One result of this light touch is the lack of data, as anyone can start a home-based food business. Would the Minister consider some simple form of tracking the number of home-based food businesses? Could the Minister also clarify, whether an operator can establish a home-based food business in a second premise whether this is an owned or rented property? If so, are there any upper limits on the number of home-based food businesses an individual or family can operate without the requirement to be licensed?”
“We should enable this so that every employer can ultimately embrace the intent of this Bill. Businesses need to do well in order to do good. At the same time we want responsible employers who take care of their employees. Employees, too, must remain diligent and responsible and be reasonable in exercising the protection this Bill provides. Mr Speaker, Sir, my questions notwithstanding, I support this Bill.”
“Statistics show that about two thirds of individuals diagnosed with ADHD present with other disorders which could fall under either the protected characteristic of disability or mental health condition. But that would leave out some who are specifically diagnosed with ADHD. Could the Minister kindly clarify whether ADHD falls under one of the protected characteristics if an individual is not concurrently diagnosed with any of the four categories under disability or mental health condition? Caregivers, too, have been a group requiring more avenues of support. In recent years, more support for caregivers has been provided across various fronts. While caregivers are more than likely to be family members as defined, there are caregivers who provide care but fall outside this definition. Could the Minister clarify if there is scope for broadening this category of caregivers? This Bill needs to be seen as an initial step towards workplace fairness as it covers broad key areas. Some concern has been raised on whether more clarity should be given in addressing issues arising in the workplace. We need to strike a reasonable balance between employers and those who fall under the protected characteristics. The workplace should not become a litigious environment as this Bill intends to preserve harmony and fairness. Nevertheless, some degree of recourse as provided in this Bill will help minimise discrimination and unfair practices should these arise. We should see this as a positive first step and therefore as a work in progress. Many employers are already providing excellent work environments and giving care to employees who fall under protected characteristics. Some employers, whether by nature of the sector or other factors, may need time to adjust.”
“In order for the individual to be included under mental health condition, there will need to be a professional diagnosis. This seems fair and reasonable. However, the outworking of this will require better understanding and awareness of mental health conditions and the benefits of seeking proper professional intervention. Public education on mental health and wellness needs to continue. Employers will also need to better understand mental health conditions and how this may impact the employee and their ability to continue in their roles after appropriate treatment – not unlike other medical issues that result in temporary incapacity to work. The workplace must therefore see transformation to one where any person with a mental health condition can be accepted and supported without the agony of stigma. While discrimination is addressed in the Bill, the broader challenge of stigma will need continuing efforts. Many employers have also provided employment opportunities for PwDs. For some years now, social enterprises and charities have been active employers for persons with disabilities. We are also seeing increasingly a much wider group of employers providing employment opportunities for PwDs. Today, PwDs are prepared for suitable jobs from the time they attend schools. This therefore removes some of the anxiety, but this will also be dependent on there being enough job vacancies once they enter the job market. There also needs to be alignment, as mentioned by hon Member Denise Phua earlier, on conditions that fall under disability. One condition is, for example, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, or ADHD.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, may I first declare my position as the executive chairman of a food service business and also as vice president of a charity providing mental health services. For persons recovering from and coping with mental health issues, meaningful employment can be both helpful and vital. If I would look back over the past 20 years or more, many employers have been extremely generous in providing employment opportunities for persons in recovery. In the more recent years, with efforts to help persons in recovery gain meaningful employment, even more employers have stepped forward. Employment support specialists have also been engaged to assist both employees in the workplace and also the employers. I would like to acknowledge with gratefulness all who have provided and continue to provide employment opportunities for persons in recovery. In passing the Workplace Fairness Bill, it will provide a good framework for issues involving potential discrimination and provide guidance for fair employment practices. I would like to touch on three of the stated protected characteristics: mental health condition, disability and caregiving. Let me continue with mental health and the protected characteristic of mental health condition. Recent studies and reports show – and have been mentioned by the Minister – that mental health issues will be an area of increasing need for intervention and support. Including this in the proposed Bill is therefore very timely. The added complexity for mental health conditions is the issue of stigma. Individuals may not disclose this even within their family and friends and may also choose not to advise their employers of their condition. Even of more concern, they may not be willing to seek proper help and suffer in silence.”
“There are also examples of hawkers who have grown into full scale restaurants on their own and not just one restaurant, but several outlets. KEK Seafood is one example of a family that has successfully transitioned into the second generation, having grown from a stall to now, a multi-outlet restaurant business. Hawker culture as we know it will need to evolve. The case study, entitled "Cooking or Cooked: The Future of Singapore's Hawker Culture" by Khor Jia Wei and Kenneth Tan, helpfully lists the multiple issues and factors feeding into the sustainability of the hawker industry. Public policy is just one of the factors. Public perception of hawkers and the expectation of cheap food may well need to evolve. However, we also want to try to ensure that access to good and affordable meals remains available and accessible for those who need this option, as we work on raising income levels. As we reframe our definition of success, there may well be a rethink on where providing good and affordable food, or taking on a thriving hawker business into the next generation will be on this list. Mr Speaker, Sir, I therefore intend to support the amended Motion.”
“The third cost component, manpower, is a continuing challenge for the F&B sector. While some hawkers work as a family unit, there are those who will need to hire assistants and the cost of this has increased. There is also the issue of supply of manpower. Manpower costs are not as key a cost component for hawkers as other F&B concepts. But where margins are challenged, any increment eats into the bottom line. Consumer spending does flow with the economic tide. During better times, it is possible that consumers will be willing to spend more on F&B and, therefore, replace a hawker meal with one at a higher cost option. Similarly, when we need to tighten our belts, the demand for hawker food may well increase. On a national level, there has been the successful inclusion of hawker culture in the UNESCO Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. Mr Speaker, Sir, the Government has not been short of efforts and allocation of resources toward the support of hawkers. I believe these will be constantly reviewed and enhanced, where appropriate. The support during and post-COVID-19 would have brought welcome relief to many hawkers, though some hawkers will have been impacted more negatively than others. Hawkers also have opportunities to improve processes and these include grants for equipment and going digital. One big challenge for the hawker industry is that of succession. While some hawkers have moved into second and third generations, many cease operations when there is no opportunity for succession. F&B operators have been seizing the business opportunity for some popular stalls and scaling these to multi-outlet operations. It remains to be seen how this will feed into the continuity of our hawker culture.”
“Inflation and higher costs have impacted many industry sectors, not just the F&B sector. Food is a necessity. Hence, higher food costs would naturally hit us more noticeably and directly. Typically, a business will raise selling price to retain operating margins. However, for F&B, this is often not so clear-cut. We are truly spoilt for choice in F&B. Hence, operators, myself included, would need to be judicious in raising selling prices. The similar cautious approach is taken by hawkers who are concerned that a price increase will result in loss of customers. Recent reports suggest that many hawkers prefer to accept the lower operating margins rather than risk losing business through a price increase. Some suggest that public perception of hawker food is low price and hence, this makes it more difficult for customers to accept price increases. Mr Speaker, Sir, F&B is a competitive business. The discerning customer will make choices, weighing price, quality, convenience and a variety of other factors. There are many initiatives to raise the profile of hawker food, with the intention to get the general public to accept paying more for hawker meals. It should be noted though that there are some hawkers who do not intend to raise prices. Some feel that they want to keep the meal affordable for those who would be adversely affected by price increases. Others would feel that they have comfortable earnings even though margins are down. In this cost area, the Government has been managing inflation at the macro level and, as mentioned by hon Members earlier, provided supplementary efforts, such as the CDC Voucher scheme. The CDC Voucher scheme has the dual impact of helping households meet higher rising costs and supporting spending at selected merchants, including hawkers.”
“It is the same pattern in other F&B concepts, whether these are food courts, quick service restaurants or full service restaurants. Some will have waiting lines, while others, you can be seated almost immediately. There are also variations in revenue levels for the same concept over various geographical locations. So, one particular brand in one particular location may attract a certain level of revenue and be different in another location. Some malls, where the foot traffic is high, the F&B outlets located there enjoy proportionately stronger sales. But this comes at a cost – higher rents. In the case of private landlords, private landlords set the rental and the tenant decides whether to accept it or not or negotiate over the best available rental. In Government hawker centres, the potential tenant offers the landlord what is considered affordable. A seasoned or experienced hawker will know the potential of the business and would have done the maths on what to bid and what is affordable. The alternative to the bidding system would be a balloting system where the rent is fixed and the variable then becomes the luck of the draw. And this has been proposed by hon Members Mr Leong and Ms Poa. This, too, will not be perfect and could result in potential vacancies, whereas the current bidding system will still award a stall for a minimum of $1 rental if this is the highest bid. I, therefore, feel the Government is addressing the issue of rental costs at hawker centres in a reasonable and fair manner under the current circumstances. The next big cost item for all food businesses is cost of raw materials. In recent years, we have seen food costs escalate, owing mostly to external factors.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, firstly, allow me to declare my interests in this matter. Currently, I serve as a member on the National Heritage Board. I am also currently Vice President of the Restaurant Association of Singapore and also Executive Chairman of a food service business. Hawkers play a key role in the F&B landscape. They continue to provide tasty and affordable meals for all Singaporeans. An NEA study in 2023 suggests that over 80% of Singaporeans consume hawker centre food at least once a week. Hawker food continues to remain largely affordable owing to a variety of factors. In F&B, the three main cost components are cost of space, that is, rental; cost of food, that is, the raw materials that go into the dish; and manpower. Hence, an F&B business thrives or survives when it generates sufficient revenue to cover all operating expenses. Government policy thus far has recognised the value and place of hawkers in our society, and it would seem the majority of hawkers benefit from generally low and manageable rentals in the 100-plus hawker centres. Older hawkers continue to benefit from the Subsidised Rent Scheme. NEA data estimates this at about 40% of cooked food stallholders. NEA also reports that the average successful monthly bid for cooked food stalls continues to be lower than rental at food courts and coffee shops. Thus, on the issue of rents, can there be a better way to support hawkers moving forward? Recent high bids in popular centres have raised the question of whether the bidding system is still the correct approach. If we look at the hawker centres, in many hawker centres there will be a few stalls with long queues and many where we can just walk up and order.”
“A public listing would both bring in fresh capital and enable NE to free up a portion of the Income investments. Alternatively, if it is decided that Income remains wholly owned and remains private under NE, the Board and Management could look into steps that would have been taken with the proposed transaction with Allianz to achieve capital extraction over time while keeping Income sustainable. This could result in releasing resources for the broader social mission. This House may continue to debate and discuss what has happened. And from that, there may well be useful lessons. However, we must be forward looking and find appropriate solutions as there would seem to be significant opportunities to enhance the social mission. Doing well for a socially driven enterprise needs its own definition, just as we are now embarking on a refreshed definition of personal success. We have a national benchmark in Temasek as a national commercially-driven organisation that also does amazing good from the commercially-driven financial returns. NE can be the national benchmark for a model socially-driven organisation. Doing well is relative. Doing well can, therefore, be more clearly articulated for NE, which, going by the latest annual report, demonstrates a healthy financial state and a commendable list of impactful social initiatives for Singaporeans.”
“A fifth characteristic is that a social enterprise runs on strong business fundamentals designed to address the social objective with the attendant measurement of outcomes falling within the constraints of the legal registration form chosen. Finally, a sixth characteristic of social enterprises is that they are continuously balancing the tensions between their financial and social objectives to meet their social purpose while remaining financially stable and sustainable." I will just mention that this came from a working paper called "Finding a common language for Social Enterprises in Singapore". The proposal for the divestment of a majority stake in Income will now be off the table with the passage of this Bill. So, what next for NE and Income? Details that surfaced on Monday disclosed that NE would receive both the proceeds from the proposed divestment and a subsequent capital extraction, thus freeing up funds which could be deployed for continuing the broader social mission, presumably beyond Income. As Income is profitable and currently financially viable, the Board and shareholders may not need to be in a hurry to find another option. Allianz has also indicated that it will review the proposal and the Government's concerns. I may be repeating options that NE and Income may already have considered. One, consider the option of a public listing of Income as a profitable and socially responsible business. Today, there is increased interest in social investing, and increasing amounts of capital are looking for suitable investments in this class. The current investment options on our own stock exchange, for example, for profitable companies with clear social mission, are extremely limited.”
“However, an organisation could outgrow its social mission or evolve over time as social norms and the landscape change and/or when its management changes. A social enterprise needs to be dynamic and alter its mission, vision and values to continue to stay relevant and the term 'rebirth' was proposed to acknowledge and articulate this characteristic. A characteristic of a social enterprise is that the organisation is addressing through business processes a clearly articulated and institutionalised social mission that is contextually relevant to the community it supports. A second characteristic speaks to the integration of the business process with the social mission. A social enterprise is an organisation whose social mission is evident not only through the products and services it offers, but also in the way it operates and the impact it achieves on the ground. A third characteristic of social enterprises is that its social mission is evident throughout its operations, products, services and its impact on the communities it serves. Unlike traditional businesses conducting projects as part of corporate social responsibility (CSR), the social good done by a social enterprise is a part of the core business of the company. Even if delivering the social good is not its sole core business, it can be considered a social enterprise as long as its social mission is visible in every aspect of its work. A fourth characteristic suggests that a social enterprise should have an intention and roadmap to sustainable financial performance. Even if it relies on multiple revenue streams, it should not be operated purely on a charity-buying model and should, over time, transition to generating increasing amounts of its revenue from earned income.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I stand to speak in support of the Bill. As a concerned citizen, I had my share of questions when the announcement was made in July for Allianz to acquire a majority stake in Income. From a purely commercial perspective, the proposal may have made good business sense. Respected voices supported the proposal. Equally, there were some who raised valid questions and concerns with the limited information available at that time. I am, therefore, pleased to note that we have in place checks and balances from the Ministerial Statement on Monday by Minister Edwin Tong, supported by Minister Chee Hong Tat, and, with this Bill, added measures to protect the interests of Singaporeans. Having been engaged with both the social sector and the business sector, I have seen and continue to see, the constant challenges of balancing doing well commercially with doing good. In efforts to better understand social enterprises in Singapore, the former Asia Centre for Social Entrepreneurship and Philanthropy at the National University of Singapore studied the NTUC social enterprise model along with several other social enterprises. Mr Deputy Speaker, may I mention that, at that point in time, I was the Centre’s Advisory Board Chair when several research and working papers were published during that period. Allow me to quote from one of the working papers: "A genuine social mission is one that is defined at the founding of the organisation and hard-coded in its DNA through the by-laws, constitution, articles of incorporation or term sheets signed with the investor. When this is the case, there is less concern of mission drift or false marketing, that is, an organisation using a social mission as a branding spin when its intentions are purely financial.”
“However, given the organisational support mechanisms in the hands of these organisations and having these in place, enhancing participation in sports for these organisations could be an added focus. To achieve this may need allocation of more funding and I do urge the appropriate Ministries to consider this as we prepare for the upcoming and future Budgets. In addition, larger funders, such as Tote Board – I know they are already helping in a great way – can help to supplement public funding, as will the private and people philanthropic and business communities. In a conversation I had with one of our Paralympians, he called for more private sector sponsorship and support. I can certainly relate to this call. Compared to our successful Olympians, where commercial sponsorship is often widely promoted and available, we can do more for our Paralympians. I hope more companies will see this as an avenue to support, thus enabling our current para athletes and future Paralympians to excel both locally and internationally. Mr Speaker, we can and should do progressively more in the area of sports at the national level and I thank the Minister for his assurance on this and also the plans that have been outlined. As we head towards a more inclusive society, let us also intentionally allocate increased public, private and people resources to strengthen and support our para athletes, current and future Paralympians, making suitable sports options more widely available and accessible. Congratulations again to our Team Singapore Olympians and Paralympians!”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I rise in full support of this Motion. And along with my fellow Members, I would also like to add my congratulations to Team Singapore at the recent Olympics and the recent Paralympics. Your collective performance encourages all of us to pursue excellence in sports as a national agenda. Speaking as a volunteer in the social service sector for many years, I would like to say a bit more in the encouragement of expanding and extending sports for those amongst us with disabilities and special needs, that is, those who will potentially participate in future Paralympics and similar sporting events. Firstly, I hope, at a national level and across all sectors, we will begin and continue to deepen and encourage sports at the earliest possible ages. These would begin at our special needs education institutions and schools, and services for persons with disabilities. Our current curriculum may need to be expanded to facilitate, encourage and broaden interest and participation in sports. My colleagues, Mr Ong Hua Han and Ms Denise Phua have already spoken on this. Secondly, I would encourage parents of children with special needs or early diagnosed disability to consider intentional guidance towards sporting development where these are available. Selection of the type of sports will require appropriate counsel. We already have many helpful lessons from our Paralympians and their families. Thirdly, we have many established social service providers who are providing support for persons with special needs and disabilities. Many of our social service providers, though, focus on support that helps achieve basic levels of independence, including employment options when reaching adulthood.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, we need to continue to help those who struggle with gambling problems and, at the same time, we need to continue to seek preventative efforts to minimise any further rise in problem gambling.”
“Some years back, there was a private initiative for Singaporeans and PRs to protect oneself by voluntarily signing up for self-exclusion, even if one felt there was no known interest or likelihood in gambling. This pre-emptive approach could be a protective step that at least enables a first level check and balance. In particular, this could provide individuals protection from impulsive situations. The current statistics on self-exclusion indicate there are 28,000 Singaporeans and PRs in this category for self-exclusion from casinos. There may also be parents and families who are concerned about the risk of gambling affecting their children when they turn adults and gain access to casinos and other forms of gambling. Can we provide a mechanism for parents to apply for Exclusion Orders while their children below 21 years of age are under their charge and on a voluntary basis and even without any existing evidence of any gambling problem? The introduction of the IRs has shown the economic benefits. Initially, we had to handle the social fallout that accompanied this. Gambling takes many forms and we need to continue to look into all forms of gambling as we look at prevention. Tax revenues from legal gambling are sizeable and can we consider deploying more resources to the matter of prevention and protection?Social service organisations, such as We Care Community Services and other similar service providers, can be better or should be better resourced to initiate preventive programmes. We would also want to keep up our efforts to engage our youths at risk of problem gambling. Our family service centres can also be increasingly resourced to tackle frontline prevention.”
“The active Exclusion Orders aim to protect more harm from being done, though it would seem that damage has already happened in perhaps several instances. As a society embarking on a renewed social compact, we should continue to look at how we prevent problem gambling at the earliest stages. By design, casinos are embedded within world-class convention facilities, entertainment, food and beverage, retail and related attractions. Hence, the venues themselves will attract persons of all age groups. In fact, the two IRs attract significant local and foreign visitors daily, who are there to enjoy the excellent facilities. These facilities and attractions are not offered at subsidised levels to the general public. So, the operators in these two locations can, therefore, refrain from any efforts to attract such visitors to the casinos without any loss of revenue. Some may feel that there is little harm trying out a casino experience. Would we have any data on whether this seemingly innocent step has led some on the path to problem gambling? How are we monitoring this? Can we consider requiring the two casinos to review the casino access points such that these are not directly from public areas of retail, food and beverage, entertainment and attractions? The purpose of this would be to shield unsuspecting visitors and protect exposure to children. I am again here making a guess that random visitors would not be core sources of revenue for the casinos and, therefore, this would not significantly affect their current operating revenues. Unlike specialised casino destinations like Las Vegas or Macau, Singapore casinos are located within our integral day-to-day landscape and, therefore, remain a facility for many who are not drawn to these facilities for gambling.”
“Mdm Deputy Speaker, the issue of problem gambling is not new. Gambling addiction has long been a matter of social concern and can destroy lives of individuals, families and friends. In my growing up years back in the 1960s, I became aware of relatives with gambling issues and recall how this distanced them from family and, in turn, often, family from them. I was then too young to fully appreciate the realities. Though I do recall with some detail that there was a constant search for money to pay debts, including dealing with the demands of debt collectors, sometimes these were quite intimidating. When we awarded the two casino licences, there was understandable concern over the social impact, in particular, for the vulnerable and potentially those who had worked hard to build up savings that could be placed at risk. I acknowledge the various initiatives in response to the concerns and directed to minimise the consequences on various groups. I am encouraged that the relevant authorities constantly review protection for individuals affected by or at risk of problem gambling. In addition, I do support the broader objectives of this Bill to continue to stay relevant to the changing landscape. [Mr Speaker in the Chair] The report from NCPG indicated the existence of over 340,000 active Exclusion Orders as of June 2023. Taking a closer look at the statistics, exclusions by law total just over 117,000 or just about a third, and self-exclusions at about 185,000 for casinos include about 157,000 foreigners, and this is the majority group for this category. Mr Speaker, Sir, the insidious nature of gambling suggests that anyone can be vulnerable.”
“It remained unclear to me what possible circumstances could contribute to illness if the food donated was safe and healthy at the point of donation. Could Mr Louis Ng provide us some examples the Bill intends to address this? May I also suggest that there be sufficient channels of guidance for the food-insecure communities to, firstly, assist them in making the right choices; and, secondly, advise them of their rights. Through this Bill, Mr Ng has continued to advocate for the need to being responsible in the area of food wastage and highlighting the existing needs of fellow citizens and residents who do not have access to three meals a day. We must continue to work on both these areas. Successful implementation, looking ahead, could, therefore, bring us to this scenario where: firstly, efforts to reduce food wastage bring good results; secondly, food will still find its way to the food-insecure as part of the reduction in food wastage; thirdly, there may, however, be less food available for donation from the many sources as food wastage reduces. However, hopefully, when we get to that stage, there will be a sizeable reduction in those in our community who continue to be food-insecure. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in keeping with the brevity and relative simplicity of this Bill, may I conclude by lending support to the Bill and thanking the hon Member, Mr Louis Ng, for bringing this to the House.”
“Moving to the other sectors of food, may I suggest that wholesalers and retailers review the timelines set on donating food reaching expiry dates? It is, of course, clear that every business needs to stay profitable and viable. However, for those that continue to do well, perhaps donating dry goods with a longer shelf life can achieve the dual objectives of reduced wastage and more food for those who can benefit from such donations. In passing this Bill, there should be guidelines on what types of food should not be donated, purely for health and safety reasons. Some suggestions from a RAS survey include exclusion of milk-based food and shellfish – generally, food that easily spoils. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I move now to the second objective, which is the redistribution of consumable food. Mr Louis Ng did a great deal of research and consultation in the four years and has reached some level of confidence that by absolving donors of liability there would be more food available for donation. In his opening remarks, Mr Louis Ng mentioned that with the removal of liability, some hotels and restaurants would be prepared to step forward and donate food. May I ask if he has identified other groups who are currently reluctant to donate but would possibly step forward with this protection from liability? I initially struggled with the exemption of liability on some basic principles. The intended beneficiaries are fellow human beings who must retain their dignity and basic rights. In all likelihood, they would be vulnerable and, therefore, may need guidance. Unfortunately, if they do get ill from consuming donated food, they would have the added struggle of medical costs.”
“I would like to now touch on some areas related to food services: catering and general retail and distribution of food. The food and beverage (F&B) industry continues to face high operating costs. As a result, cost of food, whether raw or prepared, is often carefully controlled. Most operators will control inventory to minimise spoilage from overstocking perishable items. There are constant efforts to keep improving operational efficiencies and managing the bottom line. Controlling food wastage at source is primary in a sustainable F&B business. Most commercial F&B operators require licensing and follow strict compliance requirements toward food safety and hygiene. Cooked food is to be consumed within stipulated time limits and consumers are provided with this information. Owing to the health and safety regulations and also the cost controls by F&B operators, there would seem to be limited amounts of prepared or cooked food suitable for donation. Some foods, such as breads and pastries that have longer shelf life, may remain safe for consumption, though the quality may be affected after a period of time. However, this does not suggest that the F&B industry cannot still be Good Samaritans. I would encourage the F&B industry, wholesalers and retailers of food in all forms, to be generous and work with groups, including the hon Member, to make available food to meet the basic needs of food-insecure sectors of our communities. Many F&B operators donated generously during COVID-19 and this spirit of generosity can find new avenues as we strive toward a more caring society, caring for each other and also caring for the environment.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, may I first mention my involvement in commercial food services and catering, and also as an office holder in the Restaurant Association of Singapore (RAS). I would like to thank the hon Member Mr Louis Ng for introducing the Good Samaritan Food Donation Bill. I would also commend him on the brevity and general simplicity of the Bill. It makes for easy and pleasant reading. In introducing this Bill, Mr Ng mentioned it had been a four-year journey. The Bill intends to reduce food wastage and increase food available for the redistribution to food-insecure communities. Food wastage cannot continue to increase without responsible response at both national and international levels. Many initiatives continue in this attempt to curb food wastage. We must do our part in Singapore to reduce food wastage across all the areas, within our ability to do so. Most of us in Singapore are blessed with the ability to afford all our meals. We are, however, aware that there are communities in our midst facing challenges to place food on the table, each meal, for various reasons. Food wastage takes many forms. Some years back, a National Environment Agency (NEA) study found that each household disposed of about 2.5 kilogrammes of avoidable food waste each week. If each household took action to distribute some or most of this, Mr Louis Ng will see the tangible results of reducing unnecessary food waste and, concurrently, making food available for the food-insecure communities. I accept that this may be too simplistic and general. Though efforts in this direction can result in many, many more good Samaritans stepping forward across Singapore. The parable of the Good Samaritan illustrated that we can and should show love for everyone beyond just family and friends.”