Lee Hui Ying
Singapore
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I thank the Senior Minister of State for his reply. Our waste generation per capita has fallen from 1.06 kilogrammes in 2015 to 0.83 kilogrammes today. This suggests that Singaporeans are ready to try and reduce waste and also, then the real progress lies upstream in waste prevention.”
“They share with me they help pet owners who cannot afford veterinary healthcare bills and end up surrendering their pets – the vets continue to treat the animals and even rehome them to another family. The Vet Council has the potential to help grow this booming industry.”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. In Budget 2016, there was a one-year freeze in foreign worker levies for the marine and process sectors due to the oil price's downturn. Ten years on, we now face a global oil price surge.”
“Finally, we must strike a difficult balance between preparing for the future and immediate needs. Building and maintaining coastal protection facilities is an expensive responsibility. Once built, these facilities will still need maintenance to cope with erosive damages from sea water.”
“Young Singaporeans shy away from the sector due to perceptions of harsh working hours and site conditions, and our local core is ageing. We cannot rely solely on a transient workforce. How will MND redesign construction careers to attract and anchor a sizable local talent pool? Fourth, liability framework for contractors.”
“Thank you, Mr Chair. I just have two quick clarifications for Senior Minister of State Janil. First, regarding the pilot that NEA is going through with the Town Councils on the surveillance camera deployments. Can I get further granular details in terms of the length of this pilot that is ongoing? How long would it be taking?”
The complete record
Every one of 83 lines we hold for Lee Hui Ying, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 1 of 2.
“Mr Deputy Speaker, I believe these efforts are about more than just job creation and economic growth. We also aspire to achieve genuine connectivity in every sense – one that enhances the lived experience of the Singaporeans. In Nee Soon South, the Chencharu area is set to see around 10,000 new homes built by 2040. This means that over the next 15 years, approximately 30,000 new residents are expected to move in at an average of around 2,000 per year. Early planning is essential to prevent transport bottlenecks that would be difficult to resolve once the residents have already moved in. I am glad to have been able to engage early with the key agencies, such as LTA, to begin preliminary discussions on expanding the transport networks in Nee Soon South or upgrading Khatib MRT station. For residents, it is often these small improvements that make the greatest difference. Better pedestrian access and well-planned transport connections can make daily commutes safer and more convenient. I look forward to continuing to work with MOT, LTA and our community partners. (In English): Mr Deputy Speaker, I look to the future of our transport sector with optimism. A world-class transport sector gives our residents more than convenience. It connects them seamlessly across Singapore and opens the door to the world for leisure, education, business and work. Because when Singapore moves well, the world moves with us. Mr Deputy Speaker, I support the Motion.”
“This means we can expect around 30,000 new residents to move into this 70-hectare area over the next 15 years, an average of 2,000 residents every year. So, therefore, upstream planning, transport planning is critical to avoid bottlenecks that will be difficult to solve once residents move in. I am grateful to have started early conversations with key agencies, including LTA, on plans for the local transport network or upgrades for Khatib MRT. For residents, it is often the small improvements that make the biggest difference. More accessible pathways and well-planned transport flow can make everyday journeys safer and easier. I look forward to working closely with the Ministry, LTA, and our community partners and our residents to plan ahead, address the needs early, deliver practical improvements that will serve Chencharu well for years to come. Sir, in Mandarin, please. (In Mandarin): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Mr Deputy Speaker, I support this Motion. Singapore's status as a globally connected hub for aviation, maritime and logistics did not come easily, and we must never take it for granted. A world-class transport hub requires a world-class workforce. We must create as many of these jobs as possible and equip Singaporeans with the capabilities to fill them. I would like to ask the Ministry of Transport how it plans to help our workers prepare for what lies ahead. Could the Minister share with us the projected manpower forecasts, the expected ratio of local to foreign workers and the job functions likely to see growing demand? More importantly, what plans do we have to train, attract and retain talent so as to ensure that Singapore continues to maintain its edge?”
“To pursue decarbonisation while maintaining our transport sector's economic competitiveness is a precarious balancing act. While it is important for us to take tangible steps towards lowering our emissions and taking the measured approach towards increasing the mandated proportion of sustainable aviation fuel blend, this should proceed with caution. The sustainable aviation fuel is still currently estimated to be about two to four times the price of jet fuel even when recent oil prices are at a record high due to the Middle East conflict. The costs from mandating sustainable aviation fuel and the accompanying levies could make Singapore less attractive as an air transport hub, especially if neighbouring air hubs choose not to undertake similar measures. While we currently have a competitive advantage, which would offset these additional costs, we should and must never take our existing competitive advantage for granted. So, I urge MOT to take calibrated steps in future on mandatory sustainable aviation fuel blend rates. The best way for us to maintain our long-term competitive advantage in the transport sector is to proactively shape the standards of the industry. The Technical Reference 68 is one good start. We must continue to play that strategic role of shaping the international standards on safety, ethics and security in the usage of autonomous technologies and AI in this industry. Lastly, Mr Speaker, Sir, I believe our intent to be a global transport hub is not just to create good jobs and pursue economic growth. All these are important, but we also want to be able to deliver to Singaporeans connectivity that improves their lived experiences. In Nee Soon South, Chencharu is planned to have about 10,000 new homes by 2040.”
“Remaining competitive and creating good jobs for our residents requires constant change. But as we push ahead, we must remind one another that compassion must prevail in our society. Those who helped build this sector must not be left behind. Even as we press on to be world-leading, we must ensure change is managed with people at its heart. As we adopt AI, these technologies should empower our workforce and not simply replace it. Our workers should be active partners in this transformation – equipped, involved and given the confidence to experiment with new technologies rather than fear being displaced. Next, staying competitive. I now turn to the balance between decarbonisation and energy resilience. Recent events in the Middle East have reminded us that global energy supply chains remain vulnerable to geopolitical shocks. Even as countries decarbonise and electrify, many economies will continue, for some time, to depend on reliable supplies of conventional fuels, such as diesel and jet fuel, particularly for aviation, heavy transport and resilience needs. For Singapore to remain a leading maritime and global aviation hub, we must recognise this reality. We must both embrace new, sustainable technologies, but also continue to ensure that our access to conventional fuels remains secure, reliable and diversified. And so, I hope the Government will carefully consider the future of the Jurong Island refineries. Beyond their economic contribution, they anchor Singapore's contribution and position in global energy supply chains, support industries that rely on refined fuel products, and preserve capabilities and expertise that have been built over decades. These strategic considerations should form part of any long-term plans for Jurong Island refineries.”
“More importantly, what are our plans to train, attract and retain the workforce so that Singapore remains well-positioned for the next phase of growth? AI has taken centrestage over the past few years. As a country, we have been doing a lot to develop a workforce with sufficient tech professionals, including data scientists, developers and product managers, as well as a larger general workforce that is comfortable with using AI in their domain. The Ministry of Digital Development and Information (MDDI) is undertaking to ensure we engage in frontier research and to expand our education institutions' capacity to train AI talent. Tech giants are not the only ones who need tech talent. I call on the Government to ensure our upskilling efforts and AI proficiencies are spread across industries. One of the things I value about the transport sector is the wide range of talent it requires: we need brilliant AI scientists to design and maintain the cutting-edge model that will transform the industry as well as skilled technicians on the ground. Not all these talents are best developed through university education. Our polytechnics and Institutes of Technical Education (ITEs) will play a crucial role in supplying the workforce of the future. I encourage the Ministry to broker partnerships between our institutes of higher learning and industry partners to develop and update relevant courses in the present, design programmes that will meet future needs, develop scholarships and internship programmes to draw in talent in advance, and design opportunities for mid-career upgrading and career transition. The transport sector must transform quickly to stay relevant and our workforce will need to retrain, readjust and in some cases, relearn. The reality is clear.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, I rise to affirm the importance of strengthening Singapore's position as a globally connected transport hub. But this position cannot be taken for granted. We may be small on the map, but we sit right at the crossroads of the world – by land, by air, by sea and increasingly, by data and technology. Singapore has always understood one thing. In transport, if you want to stay relevant, you cannot afford to miss the boat. If we are not moving forward, we risk being left at the platform. In this increasingly unpredictable world, the strength of Singapore's transport sector and its diversity of interconnectedness to the rest of the world is not only an economic priority but also one of national security. Singapore's success today as a global transport hub did not happen by chance. It is the decades of hard work of our businesses, the many Singaporean workers and public servants across the transport sector. A world-class transport hub needs a world-class workforce. We must do our best to create these jobs and empower Singaporeans to excel in them. To this, I will speak on three key areas. First, how our AI strategy is integral to creating good jobs in the transport sector. Second, staying competitive, staying ahead. And third, matching international connectivity with local transport infrastructure. As the transport sector develops, we need to prepare a workforce that will be able to meet the needs of the future. To get there, I would like to ask how the Government is preparing our workforce for this transformation. Could the Ministry share with us a forecast of the talent we will need – the expected mix of local and foreign workforce as well as the mix of key functions where demand is likely to grow?”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I thank the Senior Minister of State for his reply. Our waste generation per capita has fallen from 1.06 kilogrammes in 2015 to 0.83 kilogrammes today. This suggests that Singaporeans are ready to try and reduce waste and also, then the real progress lies upstream in waste prevention. So, I have two supplementary questions. What are the measures MSE will take to help Singaporeans realise this? I have a few suggestions. We can draw reference from the European Union's (EU's) Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation that minimises the amount of packaging generated. Or even radio-frequency identification (RFID)-based food waste sorting systems. My second supplementary question: businesses can be required to accept reusable containers, supplying repairable products or refills. What are the policy thresholds that MSE considers to disincentivise single-use packaging or restrict aggressive promotional tactics which may put more products into the market?”
“Thank you. Essentially, for future bus stop designs, whether we will keep in mind solar panel designs or in future then to include heat resilience elements to keep our bus stops cool.”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I thank the Minister of State for the reply. Compared to 2016, when the trials took place, Singapore today is really experiencing more frequent and also intense heat stress, with 2026 projected to be among the hottest years on record. So, I have a few supplementary questions. First, whether the Ministry has studied cooler bus stop concepts used overseas for adaptation in Singapore? For example, a solar-powered bioclimatic shelter in Spain that actually can claim to reduce temperatures by 20°C to keep pedestrians cool? Second supplementary question: as we adapt to a rising urban heat, whether then commuter heat resilience can be a formal consideration in future bus stop designs? Third supplementary question: may I ask for the progress of the green roofs deployment and how does the Ministry identify and prioritise these bus stops for green roofs deployment? And in Nee Soon South, we have four bus stops surrounding Khatib Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) station. We are happy to partner the Ministry and LTA to deploy the green roofs as early as possible in the area, so that we can beat the heat together.”
“They share with me they help pet owners who cannot afford veterinary healthcare bills and end up surrendering their pets – the vets continue to treat the animals and even rehome them to another family. The Vet Council has the potential to help grow this booming industry. But a lack of specialist clarity or support for our vets can threaten the initiative's potential. We want a Council that elevates standards without crushing the spirits of those who practice. These clarifications aside, I stand in support of the Bill. 2.59 pm”
“The veterinary industry has a small community but high attrition rates. Practitioners typically require years of specialised study yet face relatively low remuneration, whilst also dealing with emotional fatigue and harassment. If practitioners need to invest more time and money to advance as specialist veterinarians, but remuneration and working conditions remain unchanged, this situation may further deteriorate. The cost of manpower shortage will ultimately be passed on to consumers, as fewer veterinarians mean not only higher costs but also reduced choices. Therefore, I would also like to ask the Minister whether consideration will be given to providing veterinarians with "Industry Abuse Protections" similar to those established by the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons in the UK, to strengthen occupational safeguards for veterinary practitioners? In Nee Soon South, I know some residents who work as veterinarians. They not only care for pets but also help pet owners with compassion. They tell me that when they encounter situations where owners cannot afford medical bills and are forced to surrender their pets, they continue treating these animals and find new homes for them. The Veterinary Council has the potential to elevate this industry to the next level, but without clear definition of the specialist system or support for practitioners, it would be futile. Therefore, I look forward to seeing a Council that can raise industry standards without dampening practitioners' enthusiasm. (In English): Mr Speaker, vets do more than care for our animal companions. They are the first line of defence for zoonotic diseases and public health. In Nee Soon South, I have residents who are also vets and they go the extra mile.”
“Will the Ministry consider extending the "Industry Abuse Protections" to veterinarians under the Vet Council, similar to the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons in the UK, to provide them with better occupational support? Mr Speaker, in Mandarin, please. (In Mandarin): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Mr Speaker, this Bill represents an important milestone for our veterinary industry. As more Singaporeans keep pets and pay greater attention to pet care, the veterinary industry is expected to continue flourishing. Establishing a new registration system for veterinary specialists will help enhance public trust and quality in advanced veterinary services. We would not expect a GP to perform complex specialist surgery on humans. Similarly, in the veterinary system, the blurred boundaries between specialist and non-specialist treatment make more comprehensive regulatory mechanisms necessary. The Australian and New Zealand College of Veterinary Scientists has established a four-tiered professional qualification framework. Many of our vets have trained in Australia and the UK and are familiar with such tiered systems. Therefore, we have received feedback suggesting that the proposed tiered system, particularly in the specialist category, still has room for improvement. For this reason, I would like to ask the Minister: First, will the Minister further clarify the specific requirements for the specialist veterinary category in subsidiary legislation? Second, if we maintain the current three-tiered system, how can we ensure it will be as effective in safeguarding public interest? Third, to complement the Bill and encourage more stringent and continuous professional development, will the Government consider providing training support and grants for vets?”
“Lastly, we must talk about the "abuse gap." In the UK and Australia, the British and Australian Veterinary Associations have reported a surge in "cyberbullying" and physical intimidation by pet owners. In Singapore, vets often face "de minimis" claims – small, repetitive legal threats – that constitute a form of harassment. The Government has done a great job since COVID-19 to prevent and protect our healthcare workers from harassment and abuse. We can do the same for our vets. In the UK, this protection is extended to vets under the Respect Your Vet Team initiative. Furthermore, the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, which is the UK's equivalent of a Veterinary Council, provides additional support to vets that makes them more than just a regulatory and disciplinary body. The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons provides a hotline for vets to discuss grey area issues, support vets through difficult disputes and, in recent years, have launched numerous initiatives to champion the mental well-being for vets. One such initiative is the ProfCon Investigation Support that provides Confidential Peer Support for those under investigation and their flagship Mind Matters Initiative that provides workshops to promote mental well-being and mental health in the industry. This is a small industry with high attrition rates. Vets tend to have lower comparative pay despite years of specialised study, while managing compassion fatigue and abuse. This is slated to worsen if individuals spend more time and money to upskill as specialists, but continue to receive similar pay and working conditions. This shortage, in turn, transfers to the consumers, as a fall in the supply of vet services results in higher costs and fewer choices.”
“Second, if we are to stick with these three tiers, how does this safeguard the public interest as effectively as more granular international models? Third, to complement the Bill and encourage more stringent and continuous education requirements, will the Ministry consider providing support and grants to vet professionals for continuing education? Second, another clarification desired on the ground is how will we protect our vets against death by process in possibly dealing with a "double penalty" of having to simultaneously defend a claim in the civil courts and a Vet Council inquiry, for the same set of facts. I understand that both processes serve a different purpose. The civil courts serve to compensate for damages, and the Vet Council serves to discipline malpractice. However, vets who are likely to operate in smaller clinics would not have the resources to address two parallel processes. A single case could be a death sentence for the business, even if they are eventually cleared. For example, under clause 56 of the Bill, an Interim Order can suspend a vet for up to 18 months while investigations proceed. This is a staggering timeframe to disrupt a person's livelihood. Accountability is important, but it must be balanced with trust in our professionals. Otherwise, we risk increasing consumer costs from defensive medicine or deterring passionate people from taking up this specialised career. To avoid disproportionate "punishment by process", can the Minister of State elaborate first, how does the Government balance the potential proceedings vets may face? Will there be guidelines to limit the amount of investigation time? If there are concurrent proceedings, can civil cases be put on hold until findings from the Vet Council have been released?”
“In contrast, the Australian and New Zealand College of Veterinary Scientists stipulates a highly stratified professional qualification framework that informs their registration, including four tiers distinguishing general practitioners, members, fellows and finally, registered specialists. The highest tier of registered specialist requires both a post-doctoral degree and years of clinical experience. This is similar to the residency system in human healthcare medicine. Moreover, there is a wide variety of postdoctoral degrees offered to prospective students, allowing them to upskill at the correct level of expertise and knowledge. Similarly, the UK distinguishes between general practitioners, advanced practitioners and board-certified specialists. Advanced practitioners have postdoctoral degrees and practical experience but still might not meet the threshold to be considered board-certified specialists who receive residency training similar to human medicine, contribute to published research and are active in the specialty. Contrast this with our three-tier system, which groups all levels of postgraduate expertise under a single "specialist" banner. This may risk the specialist tier being too blunt and not useful to consumers as a mark of trust and quality. Many vets in Singapore studied in Australia and the UK. They are already familiar with more detailed tiered systems. So, it is not surprising that we have received feedback that the proposed tiers could be more robust, especially in the specialist class. First, will the Ministry substantiate the specific requirements for the specialist tier in the subsidiary legislation?”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I rise to speak in support of the Veterinary Practice Bill. This is a milestone for our veterinary community, a profession that has grown from just over 100 practitioners two decades ago to about 700 today. The industry is still ripe for greater growth. Pet ownership continues to rise and Singaporeans are more sensitive to the care of their furry companions. Many neighbouring countries already have robust regulations for the veterinary industry, and it is opportune for Singapore to join the conversation. As we move towards a more sophisticated regulatory landscape, we must ensure this Bill has the "claws and teeth" to protect not only the animals and their guardians, but also the dedicated professionals who serve and save them. I wish to raise three areas of clarifications for consideration. First, the introduction of a specialist register is a welcome move, strengthening the trust and quality of advanced veterinary services. We would not expect a general practitioner (GP) to perform complex orthopaedic, eye or soft tissue surgery on a human without a residency period and proper specialisation. But these are common surgeries that general licensed vets do in Singapore. This blurred distinction between specialised and non-specialised treatment in the current "GP-heavy" veterinary landscape creates a need for deeper regulation. However, we must ask if the proposed three-tiered system is sufficiently robust. Specifically, clause 16 defines a specialist tier broadly and gives the Council greater statutory discretion to determine someone's place in this tier. There were concerns raised that the broadness of this tier cannot effectively motivate veterinary pursuits at the highest level.”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. In Budget 2016, there was a one-year freeze in foreign worker levies for the marine and process sectors due to the oil price's downturn. Ten years on, we now face a global oil price surge. Many sectors, especially the construction sector, that rely heavily on diesel for logistics and transport, now face doubling or even tripling of their business operating costs. Will the Government consider a temporary freeze of foreign worker levies to affected sectors, especially the construction sector? This will directly help to offset the impact of rising costs. And if the crisis prolongs, were there be alternative support measures to help these businesses manage this cost as well? This include businesses who manage private contracts who will not be able to benefit from BCA's co-sharing of fuel calls for key Government projects.”
“Finally, we must strike a difficult balance between preparing for the future and immediate needs. Building and maintaining coastal protection facilities is an expensive responsibility. Once built, these facilities will still need maintenance to cope with erosive damages from sea water. When coastal landowners face difficult market conditions or short-term cash flow challenges, how should maintenance work continue? (In English): Sir, notwithstanding my clarifications, I stand in support for the smooth sailing implementation of this Bill.”
“Has the Government assessed how this Bill will affect business competitiveness for our coastal landowners? Like the seas, businesses have its high and low tides. What happens to maintenance when coastal landowners face difficult market conditions or short-term liquidity challenges? Do we have contingency plans in place to provide support? Otherwise, we might not only have poorly maintained structures, but possibly lose valuable businesses. Sir, in Mandarin, please. (In Mandarin): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] As a small-island nation, rising sea levels pose a real threat to Singapore. By 2100, sea levels are projected to rise to 1.15 metres, and during extreme weather, could even surge to five metres. This is already higher than over 30% of Singapore's land. Some smaller island-nations have already had to plan to relocate their citizens. If we do not plan early, our descendants may one day also face a situation of having to leave this island. Therefore, I support this Bill. There are three things that I would like to raise. First, our coastal protection needs to establish a continuous line of defence. This implementation process must remain consistent and highly integrated. I would like to ask, can the Coastal Protection Code of Practice provide sufficient guidance to encourage different landowners to implement consistently, or will PUB serve as an overall coordinator, pre-approving relevant coastal protection plans? Second, how do we ensure that this Bill can be smoothly implemented over such a long period of time? Financial support over such a long duration also needs to ensure there is proper accountability. How can we track the use of funding during this period to ensure that funds are properly used for coastal protection?”
“These could be more difficult to set up and integrate in a continuous defence line. Will there be technical guidance to help them integrate nature-based solutions with other coastal management features? Second, how will we manage the smooth implementation of this Bill over such a long timeframe? Over 10 years, and surely by the year 2100, we can expect that landowners, lessees and personnel have gone through various changes. Effective handover of knowledge is crucial for these measures to be effective. Will PUB set guidelines or conditions for the handover of technical knowledge to new landowners or lessees to preserve critical technical knowledge of privately-built coastal defences during transitions? Can critical data be centrally stored in the Coastal Protection Interpretation Plan, so that new owners, or even the Government, can step in where needed? It is also important to stay accountable and be accountable for financial support that we provide over such a long period. How will the use of the grants be tracked over this period to ensure funds are properly deployed to coastal protection? What happens if landowners receive the grant and then liquidate or sell the property during the 10-year term? Lastly, we must strike a difficult balance between building resilience for the future and succeeding in the present. Coastal landowners are those in key strategic sectors, such as shipping and energy. Singapore's future also requires that they can stay competitive in the global economy. Constructing and maintaining coastal protections is a costly responsibility. In-depth studies and top-quality workmanship are needed to build effective defences. After construction, the coastal defences also need constant maintenance from sea erosion damage.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, as a small-island nation, the dangers of rising sea levels to us are real. By the year 2100, sea levels would have risen to 1.15 metres, possibly surging to five metres during weather events. This is higher than more than 30% of Singapore. Smaller island-nations, such as Tuvalu and Kiribati have had to make plans for relocation of their population. We are fortunate and lucky to be larger. But fail to plan, plan to fail – our future generations may one day face the prospect of having to leave our island. I thus support this Bill as it makes the preparations we need to stay on the map, even into the next century. I have three areas of clarifications. First, our coastal protection requires us to build a continuous line of defence. This means implementation must be consistent and well-integrated. However, under this Bill, the responsibility is decentralised to individual landowners. Each may take a different approach to comply with the Bill. Responsible landowners would invest heavily in constructing their coastal defences, but some may choose to minimise costs, especially if they are on a temporary lease. Will the Code of conduct provide sufficient guidance to promote consistent implementation between landowners? Or will PUB act as an overall coordinator to pre-approve coastal defence plans? Would it be more efficient for the Government to build maybe the entire coastal defence line and then seek reimbursement from landowners? The Bill makes reference to implementing coastal management via nature-based solutions. This is ideal as nature-based solutions bring added benefits, such as preserving biodiversity and reducing emissions. How will we encourage landowners to adopt nature-based solutions?”
“I thank both Ministers for their comprehensive replies on the efforts for the build environment. So, I have clarifications on other areas. First, is there updated timeline on the 15-month wait-out period for the sales of a private property for residents to purchase resale HDBs? Because every week, we meet residents who appeal to waive on this due to their unique and unfortunate circumstances; some with families with young children and sometimes have to sell because of failed businesses. So, I hope support will be provided to such families. Second, I echo Minister of State Alvin's strong call to not feed the birds. But unfortunately, recalcitrant illegal bird feeders still continue to do so. So, will there be strengthened enforcement against illegal feeding? And will there be plans for step-up surveillance in hotspots and more importantly, higher penalties for repeat offenders? And on crow shooting, I have asked this earlier in the cut as well, whether there are safeguards to minimise public exposure, especially to young children. Will there be advanced notification protocols in place to inform residents in advance of such shooting efforts?”
“Young Singaporeans shy away from the sector due to perceptions of harsh working hours and site conditions, and our local core is ageing. We cannot rely solely on a transient workforce. How will MND redesign construction careers to attract and anchor a sizable local talent pool? Fourth, liability framework for contractors. This also deters locals from entering the industry. The fear of excessive liability falling on individuals can be paralysing, but safety is non-negotiable. Are penalties under the Building and Construction Authority Act calibrated so they uphold standards without creating a climate of fear that deters capable leaders? Third, as we push digitalisation, are regulations keeping pace? If expect transformation, policy regulation and support must move in tandem —”
“Will the Ministry consider conducting a Ecological Impact Assessment to study how culling efforts could affect our broader local biodiversity? Let us act upstream, so that problems do not spiral into a full-blown "crow-sis". Builders' Challenges in Built Environment With major infrastructure projects such as Terminal 5 underway, our construction sector continues to face significant cost and manpower pressures. Policies must be carefully calibrated to support both workforce transformation and business sustainability. The builders I have met, including some of my residents, have welcomed the New Action Team chaired by the Minister and they are encouraged by the strong leadership and attention placed on the sector. What are the Ministry's long-term plans to grow infrastructure, manpower and talent pipeline to ensure supply can meet demand? I have the following suggestions. First, on foreign manpower costs. The periodic raising of S Pass qualifying salaries creates a "domino effect", jacking up business costs unnecessarily. Instead of raising the salary, which permanently inflates the wage bill, not just on the foreign worker per se, the salary of other workers in the company will have to be increased accordingly. Contractors are suggesting the increase of the workers levy instead. This will still generate revenue for the Government without overpaying what workers ask for. Second, contractors are facing growing volatility. Has MND planned adequately to avoid supply chain disruptions? For example, is there sufficient staging and dumping grounds, adequate capacity at Jurong Port to handle cement imports, and enough workers' dormitories to support projected demand? Third, local talent is a matter of national resilience.”
“Mr Chair, animals are integral to our shared environment. The steady stream of feedback we receive on animal welfare proves that residents envision a society that is not just efficient, but harmonious and gracious. We have come a long way, but more must be done. The recent viral incident of a man cutting a community cat's whiskers reminds us that cruelty still lurks in the estates. What are the Ministry's specific plans for 2026 regarding animal welfare legislation? As our spaces become greener, urban bird populations have risen and we have been playing a cat-and-mouse game with mother nature to manage with ecologically sensitive solutions. While pigeon population control has seen some success, we continue to face a spike in house crow populations and it affects all our residents. With crow shooting as the latest control measure, I would like to ask: on the protocols, particularly on the use of shooting in residential areas; what safeguards are in place to minimise public exposure, especially to young children, during such operations in estates. Can the operations be scheduled outside school commuting hours and avoiding areas near schools and playgrounds, where young children are present? Effective enforcement is key. Beyond reactive measures, how will enforcement against illegal feeding be strengthened? Are there plans for stepped-up surveillance in hotspots, higher penalties for repeat offenders, regular tree pruning or enhanced public education? Does NParks have sufficient enforcement resources? 12.45 pm Can upstream measures – better waste management and environmental design – can these be strengthened to reduce reliance on shooting over time?”
“Thank you, Mr Chair. I just have two quick clarifications for Senior Minister of State Janil. First, regarding the pilot that NEA is going through with the Town Councils on the surveillance camera deployments. Can I get further granular details in terms of the length of this pilot that is ongoing? How long would it be taking? How are these locations being identified for surveillance camera deployment? Second, on second-hand smoke. I note the additional smoking prohibitions that are in place. I am just wondering whether NEA could consider AI-enabled technology to be used, especially on smoke detection as well.”
“This pilot using smart cameras could first, automatically and instantly mask the interiors of units and the faces of residents to ensure privacy; two, strictly detect specific motions, specifically the trajectory of an object being thrown or the lighting of a cigarette at the window interface. With this, we can overcome the privacy hurdle that currently prevents enforcement. More Designated Fishing Spots”
“Chair, Budget 2026 raises tobacco tax to discourage smoking, but the real victims are those trapped at home – children and non-smoking family members exposed to second-hand smoke. This topic has been brought up in this House multiple times. But we must continue to place attention on this silent killer. From The Global Burden of Disease 2023 study, at least one person in Singapore dies that is attributed to second-hand smoke and the numbers are climbing. It is time to move beyond taxation. It is time to act decisively to protect Singaporeans from second-hand smoke. It is time to legislate and ban smoking at windows and balconies. To be clear, it is not to police what happens inside homes, but to stop smoke from drifting into neighbours' units and harming our young and old. There is a need for stronger enforcement powers and smarter surveillance. How effective are current measures in addressing complaints on second-hand smoke and also high-rise littering? We now face a technological stalemate. Catching offenders in the act is difficult and existing cameras are limited by angles and privacy constraints within homes. As a result, recalcitrant offenders act with a sense of immunity, and many complaints reach a dead end for lack of evidence. MSE is already using AI video analytics for rat surveillance and drainage inspections. It is time we apply this strategic advantage to protect our residents' health, safety and living environment. Will MSE commission a sandbox pilot for AI-enabled enforcement cameras?”
“By setting aside more community spaces into community plots and growing public interest in community farming, we can not only supplement our food supply but also strengthen our "we first" Singapore spirit, engaging our citizens directly in stewardship of our food security. The Story behind Singapore Food Story”
“Mr Chair, in November last year, it is with a measure of regret that we note the "30 by 30" goal – producing 30% of our nutritional needs by 2030 – has been replaced with revised targets for 2035. We understand the pragmatism behind this decision. Our local agri-food sector has faced severe headwinds. We have seen high-tech farms shut down and a quarter of our sea-based farms exit the industry in 2024 due to rising costs. The statistics are sobering: in 2024, we produced only 8% of our fibre and 26% of our protein. However, while the timeline has shifted, the urgency has not. We face a global environment where supply chains are increasingly vulnerable to disruption. In this context, strengthening our local food capabilities is not just an economic ambition – it is a strategic necessity for our survival. I have three questions to the Minister. First, beyond the feasibility study on the new multi-tenant facility, how will the Ministry further support our existing local food producers to succeed even in spite of high costs? Are there plans to help them access better financing or technology to ensure both survival and ability to scale? Second, I understand 11 agencies are currently required to approve a plan for commercial farming. Will the Minister also consider allocating resources towards engagement of food producers to provide them with support to meet regulatory guidelines and requirements? Will there be a review to identify if it would be possible to streamline regulatory processes? Third, achieving our food security goals requires an "all-hands-on-deck" approach.”
“If we do not rebalance mitigation and adaptation, we risk building a future that looks good on paper but falters under real climate stress. Overcoming Plastics Recycling Challenges”
“Mr Chair, over the past months, my residents and fellow Government Parliamentary Committee (GPC) Members of Parliament (MPs) have taught me that sustainability is not just a policy goal: it is a way of life. From our Nee Soon Green Fest to our zero-waste initiatives, we see what is possible when people take ownership. Nationally, the upcoming National Adaptation Plan will push this agenda even further. But feedback from the ground is clear: we can and must do better. Our recycling rates are improving, but yet contamination of blue bins, especially with food waste, remains a persistent problem. Too many recyclables end up as trash. With Semakau Island filling up, every avoidable bag of waste is not just trash. It is a countdown to the day we run out of space. So, upstream waste reduction is critical. I have the following questions. First, will the Ministry consider widening the Resource Sustainability Act and the Good Samaritan Food Donation Act's scope to introduce stronger upstream waste reduction obligations and improve data reporting requirements to better support circular outcomes? Are there plans to set mandatory packaging waste reduction targets, rather than relying mainly on recycling rates? Second, what are the public consultation plans for the National Adaptation Plan and what measurable indicators will assess impact at the community level? Third, we celebrate businesses that cut emissions for quick wins, but too often, adaptation, the very investments that would shield us from floods, heatwaves and other climate shocks, is ignored. Why? Because the returns are long-term, less visible and harder to measure. How will the private sector be incentivised to invest meaningfully in the adaptation measures?”
“Thank you, Chair. I have two short sets of clarifications. First for Senior Parliamentary Secretary Dr Syed Harun. I hear from him that from June onwards, the MTLLPC will be introducing and working with communities for parent workshops. Can I ask on the number of locations identified? How were they identified and whether Nee Soon South will be considered, because it also has a relatively high proportion of young family in the population? My second question, on a serious note, I would like to ask the teacher, Minister, for clarification on my answer to his PSLE question. My cortisol levels are spiking and overflowing, so I hope to get an answer from him as well.”
“Sir, in Mandarin, please. (In Mandarin): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Bilingualism is central to Singapore's identity, yet gaps remain. Some students struggle with both English and their mother tongue and interest in mother tongue languages is waning. I speak from personal experience as a former Language Elective Programme (Chinese) student. I am proud to enjoy my mother yongue. Our identity as bilingual Singaporeans is special. Bilingualism should not be a policy, it should be a skill students embrace with confidence and pride. Yet mastering two languages is no easy feat. Too often, it is seen as an exam to pass and a source of stress rather than a living language. Has our current policy kept pace? How can we reignite interest? I ask whether MOE will provide greater support for parents to immerse young children at home and leverage digital platforms to make learning engaging. We need targeted support for weaker learners, stronger teacher training and curricula that make languages relevant and engaging. Assessments should reward practical use, not just exam results. Only then can bilingualism become a lifelong skill, empowering our students and sustaining our cultural heritage. Community Partnerships for Bilingualism”
“Mr Chair, AI is transforming education. But our goal must be clear. Students should be not just learners or users of AI, but innovators and creators of AI. AI-ducation – the use of AI to personalise learning, identify gaps and guide teaching – can help students progress at their own pace while freeing teachers from repetitive tasks to focus on mentorship and meaningful learning. To be AI-ready, how will students and teachers be equipped with the resources and skills needed to thrive in an AI-ducation environment? Our next bound of staff development must focus decisively on AI proficiency. First, AI can be a force multiplier to address staff strength challenges. We need to up the AI proficiency of all staff so they can free up "human bandwidth" for high-value student interactions. Second, teachers must be practitioners of AI before they can be teachers of AI. Beyond standard professional development, is there a structured AI proficiency roadmap so every teacher can use AI confidently as a daily assistant? How do we ensure AI tools are deployed to subtract admin workload rather than add a new layer of tech management duties? Is there a framework to regularly benchmark teachers' AI competency? Our students and educators must not just use AI. They must innovate it, create it and lead its future. Unlocking Potential Through Data”
“Mr Chairman, education should be joyful. Yet in Singapore, once every six years, parents face intense pressure over two milestones: Primary 1 registration and the PSLE. The uncertainty of school placements, combined with the high stakes of academic outcomes, creates enormous stress – stress that no parent should face alone. The Primary 1 registration process focuses on what the parents have done. Whether they live nearby, are alumni, or volunteer. We should spotlight our children instead. We go great lengths to get priority. I have deep respect for their efforts to do what they believe is best for their children. But we must reflect on how or whether the system unintentionally amplifies anxiety, undermines fairness and detracts from the schooling experience. As MOE embarks on a review of the Primary 1 registration process, I have two points to make. How does the current system create stress? In our meritocratic society, every child who works hard should have the opportunity to thrive. One practical step could be removing the secondary school affiliation advantages, so all students compete on a fair footing. Second, can the process better support students of diverse backgrounds and talents? The system should feel like Harry Potter’s Sorting Hat, helping parents choose the school where their child can maximise their own unique potential. Let us centre the child – and match or sort each one to a school where their unique potential can flourish. Sleep Health and Later School Start”
“Mr Deputy Chairman, our senior youths today – not young seniors, but senior youths, those in their late 20s to 30s, are burdened with adulting responsibilities. They are now in a liminal space. They face a different reality, one marked by disruption and exponential change. They have just entered the workforce, just got married, just started their parenthood journey. And just as they learn to care for their children, they are called to care for their parents too. They face unique challenges, which risk being left out by supports that are targeted at the usual age groups or life stages. While they strive to remain committed at work, caregiving responsibilities are often unpredictable and do not fall neatly into existing leave categories. The Prime Minister has sent a clear signal that support for our young parents is important. I urge the Minister to consider a flexi-care leave scheme, which is already adopted by some private organisations. This will give workers the assurance and flexibility to respond to caregiving needs across different life stages without having to choose between their jobs and their families. It can be for accompanying parents to medical appointments, caring for a child who is unwell or attending to urgent caregiving needs at home – or simply a day to recharge for their own mental well-being, no questions asked. This is not just a matter of compassion, but of workforce sustainability. By supporting working caregivers, we enable them to stay employed, productive and present, strengthening both our families and our workforce. Made For Families Certification”
“What measures will the Government take to alleviate the burden on businesses, households and individuals for a successful race to a low-carbon transition? Carbon Policy and Transition Support”
“Mr Chair, we are in a race to a low-carbon future while I am in a race against time. In his Budget 2026 speech, the Prime Minister acknowledged the decline in global climate momentum, which may see Singapore pegging its carbon tax at the lower end of the $50 to $80 per tonne range by 2030. This would be buffered by other measures, such as developing other energy sources, importing low-carbon electricity and scaling up the use of electric vehicles (EVs). However, one area of growing concern is the significant carbon footprint incurred by the use of generative AI (GenAI). Singapore is taking much-needed steps forward but also risks leaving a larger environmental footprint with every step. How can Singapore ensure AI development is climate-aligned? The carbon footprint of GenAI can vary significantly, depending on factors, such as model size, training frequency, cooling systems and the energy mix powering data centres. Given this, does the Ministry have an estimate of the environmental footprint based on the planned AI scale-up? If yes, how does it fare against our existing footprint? How does the Ministry intend to quantify Singapore-specific emissions arising from AI development? Is there a framework to measure and publicly disclose the carbon footprint associated with large-scale AI infrastructure? How is the projected energy demand from AI being incorporated into Singapore's long-term carbon modelling and emissions trajectory planning? Are there plans to also implement carbon taxes on AI infrastructure to encourage responsible use? What is the expected carbon tax rates, considering all known factors? The increase in carbon tax rates will translate into higher costs borne by corporations and communities.”
“Young employees may rely on models' output, but our seniors who have lived through decades of trials possess the intuition to spot errors and this is their unique advantage. Last year, the Alliance for Action on Empowering Multi-Stage Careers for Mature Workers (AfA-EMW) launched a pilot programme, collaborating with various parties to jointly create solutions for re-skilling, alternative employment models and progressive retirement. While this is a positive start, we should also care for those seniors who prefer a low commitment but high impact work. I suggest establishing a matching service, such as connecting industry veterans with SMEs to serve as consultants, subject matter experts or trainers. The Japanese refer to the marginalised senior employees as Madogiwa-zoku. But I see it as a more positive vision. These senior professionals can sit by the window and provide guidance and mentorship to the younger generation. Quality ageing is not only about financial security but also about providing our seniors with a space where they can live with dignity and purpose for years to come. (In English): Mr Speaker, Sir, as Singapore stands at the edge of these historic inflection points, from the AI disruption to the transition into a super-aged society, we must remember, above all, our people are here to stay. And it is only in a place that feels like home, which offers both the stability of purpose and the promise of progress, that we bring out the best in our people. When Singaporeans feel they have found their place, they will, in return, bring the best of themselves to shape the future of this country. With that, I support the Budget.”
“This could be daunting enough to put them off returning altogether and we lose out to their valuable experience and productivity. As we push forward with our plans to build leadership in growth sectors, falling behind for these parents is even more likely. We can help them find balance. To make the best choice between time for their children and the ability to return to their careers. Trade-offs will exist, but it will be a waste if parents feel the door is closed once they slow down for a few years. One starting point is to double down on SkillsFuture for these parents. Having a dedicated set of courses targeted at returning parents, with course requirements and schedules built around those with caregiving responsibilities. Flexi-work arrangements should become a mainstream feature of good jobs – not an exception, but an integral part of how we attract, retain and empower workers across every life stage. This includes encouraging employers to offer flexible hours, part-time professional roles and phased return-to-work options, so parents can rebuild their careers while meeting caregiving roles. When we enable parents to return with confidence and dignity, we not only strengthen families – we also retain valuable skills, experience and talent in our workforce. Mr Speaker, in Mandarin, please. (In Mandarin): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Fourth, to assist our seniors in employment, Singapore is set to become a super-aged society this year. Our seniors are not only a group that needs support, but have also become an important pillar of the workforce. The life experience and seasoned wisdom that our seniors have are difficult for AI to replicate. They are the most reliable defence against the AI hallucinations.”
“During that one week, students used pen and paper or went 24 hours screen-free without using technology to complete their assignments. Similarly, students should be required to submit initial drafts or brainstorms on pen and paper for peer, teacher review, which encourages them to think critically before using GenAI as a sounding board or editor. Let our young be innovators, be creators, not users, of AI. Harnessing AI to facilitate students' education looks different at every stage. In pre-tertiary education, AI's best use case might be critiquing a PSLE composition; in tertiary education, it might be supporting a literature review; in internships, it might be turning an admin task from a day's work to an hour's work through automation. While MOE has already provided parents and students with general resources on GenAI and EdTech, students would also benefit from a guideline on specific GenAI use cases across educational levels and subjects. Our youth are and have always rose to the challenges of this generation. We need to provide platforms, define pathways and envision possibilities in partnership with them, giving them room to become our future changemakers. Third, navigating back to the workforce for returning parents, many of whom are our senior youths. Whether due to personal circumstances or a desire to focus on their children's early years, some parents choose to take a break from work. When these parents return, they face an uphill battle to re-integrate themselves back into the workforce, especially if they have taken a long break due to multiple children or even waiting to help their children prepare for the PSLE. They re-enter a workplace with new tools and skills needed, their networks having moved on and a short runway to prove themselves again.”
“Supporting start-ups to hire local graduates would also enable these workers to take ownership while providing start-ups with the much-needed pairs of hands, while aligning with the strategic focus on supporting high-growth companies. Also on jobs, our construction sector continues to face significant cost and manpower pressures. Policies must be carefully calibrated to support both workforce transformation and business sustainability. With the increase in minimum qualifying salaries for S Pass holders, a more sector-based and skills-focused approach may be needed for construction, where structural manpower shortages persist and margins are unhealthily eroded. Salary benchmarks should better reflect skills, experience and job responsibilities, rather than relying heavily on age tiers alone. This will help firms manage workforce costs responsibly, while continuing to support fair wages. I will speak more on this during the Committee of Supply debate. Second, navigating the AI world. Given the prevalence of GenAI, teaching our students to fluently converse with these models has become a non-negotiable for the future. However, students risk letting ChatGPT fill in the blanks for them at the expense of their own development and losing critical thinking. AI cannot just be a buzzword. How do we create an environment where students are innovators and creators of AI and use GenAI as a tool and not a crutch? I suggest we look to current initiatives tackling general technology use for inspiration. Recently, the National University of Singapore college held its first "Touch Grass Week", named after an online term for disconnecting from technology and stepping into the outside world.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, ending 2025 with a 5% growth despite global headwinds is a significant achievement. Yet, for many, this feels less like a triumph but more like a collective sigh of relief. Amidst such uncertainty, Singaporeans often feel torn between the safety of the conventional route and the risk of forging their own path. However, in this age of disruption, we cannot afford to choose one over the other. Success today requires a marriage of intentional strategy and individual passion. AI-ready, job-ready, future-ready, but are Singaporeans ready? How can we support every Singaporean to not just survive the waves but navigate them with purpose? First, navigating the job market. In the labour market, it remains uncertain. Our young graduates have always been viewed as a highly employable group, due to their ability to perform quickly as they learn on-the-job. However, the ground is shifting as companies hire for highest productivity at lower cost, experience becomes the differentiator from day one. While most students complete internships, many find that these stints lack the technical depth or clear conversion pathways needed to secure a full-time role in a competitive market. How can the Ministry of Manpower and the Ministry of Trade and Industry actively create and recreate job opportunities in response to these shifts? The Government introduced the Graduate Industry Traineeships Programme last year. In addition to financial services and information and communications, traineeships should be expanded to include the newly announced focus sectors in Singapore's AI strategy – advanced manufacturing, connectivity and even healthcare – as well as people-centric industries, such as social services sectors and retail.”
“Can the Minister reveal what plans there are to improve the convenience and connectivity network of shared paths in HDB estates? With our rapidly ageing population, mobility aids will only become more prevalent. I hope this Bill can ensure that all Singaporeans can use our roads safely and conveniently. (In English): Mr Speaker, Sir, notwithstanding these clarifications, I fully support the Bill. With the increasing prevalence of PMA use in our ageing population, I hope that this Bill enables safer and more accessible roads and paths for all Singaporeans.”
“Furthermore, the health condition of PMA users changes over time. They must be fit enough to operate mobility aids to reduce the likelihood of accidents. Even if they are assessed to own, does not mean they have the ability to operate. Therefore, users must meet basic requirements for vision, dexterity and mental state to safely operate assistive devices. Will the assessment for mobility scooters include evaluating whether patients can safely operate the assistive device? Considering changes in their health conditions and the effects of ageing, will assessments have time limits for safety purposes? For example, patients with serious chronic conditions might undergo reassessment every three years? Secondly, regarding effective enforcement of regulations. I believe most users will comply with regulations, but for those bad actors who repeatedly ignore advice, will the MOT consider implementing a demerit point system as a deterrent to ensure others' safety? Will the authorities consider installing speed detectors on footpaths, similar to enhanced speed cameras and traffic cameras on roads? Thirdly, regarding the livelihoods of food delivery workers. In 2019, after PMDs were banned from footpaths, some delivery workers switched to using PMAs. The new speed and registration regulations will likely cause delivery workers, who depend on these devices for livelihoods, to lose their income. During the transition period, they desperately need additional support. Will delivery workers who want to change careers receive employment assistance? Delivery workers who switch to PABs and PMDs will not be able to use pedestrian-only paths, causing difficulties when delivering in HDB estates.”
“This could include allocating shorter distance deliveries to more PMA delivery riders to mitigate potential fall in earnings. Or will there be career transition assistance for those who wish to switch out of their delivery jobs? Additionally, delivery riders who switch to PABs or PMDs would not be able to legally ride on pedestrian paths, making it challenging for them to complete their deliveries in HDB estates. So, those who do so illegally might pose an even greater risk to pedestrians due to the higher speed limit. Therefore, could the Minister or the Ministry share on plans to improve last mile connectivity by increasing the accessibility of shared paths network within the HDB estates? Sir, in Mandarin, please. (In Mandarin): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Mr Speaker, the use of Personal Mobility Aids (PMAs) has become increasingly common, and we have a responsibility to balance the safety, responsibility and clarity for all users on public paths. I hope MOT can further clarify the impact of this Bill on PMA users, road users and food delivery workers, as well as how the new measures can be enforced. Firstly, starting from June this year, mobility scooter users must obtain medical certification after completing relevant assessments by doctors or occupational therapists before they can own a mobility scooter. These users often depend on assistive devices for basic mobility, so this assessment must be affordable for them. Will the MOT coordinate with MOH and the MSF to ensure that existing and new mobility scooter users can easily access assessment services provided by doctors and occupational therapists at affordable prices? Will the authorities set a fee cap for this service to avoid opportunistic price hiking?”
“There are still some confusion on regulations surrounding active mobility vehicles such as the speed limit and which paths or roads each vehicle is allowed to ride on. Just as we are getting used to the terms of PMA, PMD and PAB, we are now hearing new terms from the Ministry – motorised vehicles, motorised wheelchairs, motorised scooters. Will the Ministry consider increasing better and fuller public communications efforts, such as placing visible signages on speed limits and designating which vehicles are allowed on footpaths, shared paths and roads? This will reduce the number of accidents due to some riders and pedestrians who unintentionally use the wrong paths. Additionally, which I think has been highlighted in this Chamber by some Members, there are other factors other than speed that pose safety risks and public disturbance. Sometimes, you hear them before you see them. Some active mobility users play loud music on their devices, almost like a mobile disco blasting through the Housing and Development Board (HDB) blocks and footpaths. And sometimes, during wee hours of the night. Will the Ministry look into restricting the playing of loud music on such devices to minimise disturbance and to show consideration for the community? Third, some delivery riders switched to PMAs after PMDs were banned from footpaths in 2019. The new regulations on speed limit and vehicle registration are likely to result in loss of income for many delivery riders who depend on the device for their livelihoods. So, the transition support is crucial. Has the Ministry consulted with major food delivery platforms on changes in compensation structures or job allocations due to the new regulations?”
“I have seen some PMA users, while medically allowed to own a PMA, may not have the ability to safely operate their devices and this jeopardises other path users. PMA users should meet baseline requirements of eyesight, dexterity and mental state to safely operate their devices. I would like to ask if the AMS will include an assessment test to determine if the patient is able to safely operate a PMA? This may also change with time if health conditions worsen or simply from ageing. Will there be a validity of each AMS to ensure continued assessment on safe riding of PMAs? For example, a reassessment once every three years for those with severe chronic conditions. Second, the effectiveness of the regulations in making our footpaths and roads safer for everyone. From 2023 to Q3 2025, MOT said there were around 710 reported accidents involving PMAs, PMDs or PABs that resulted in injuries. And approximately 590 were on the roads and 120 were off-road, inclusive of public paths. There may have been much much more accidents that went unreported. The new regulations aim to reduce accidents involving pedestrians due to reckless speeding on footpaths and shared paths. However, the prevalence of motorised PMA users might make it difficult to enforce penalties against many cases, with some riders who decide to hit and run after the collision to avoid punishment. So, enforcement is extremely key here. Most will comply but there may still be recalcitrant users who disregard the rules. Can the Ministry consider establishing a demerit system for PMA users to deter repeat offenders who fail to consider the safety of others? Will there be physical features installed, similar to red light cameras on the roads, on shared paths to track speed limits?”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I rise in support of the Land Transport and Related Matters Bill. This introduces new and important regulations. It is so important that despite my broken voice today, I wish to share my thoughts, my residents' thoughts on this Bill to ensure safer paths for all. The growth in the use of PMAs in Singapore shows how our city has evolved – from an ageing population with greater needs for independence to a broader expectation that our public spaces accommodate different forms of mobility. But as PMAs become a common sight, it is our duty to strike the right balance of safety, clarity and responsibility between the different users of our public paths. On this Bill, I have a few clarifications regarding the enforceability and impact of these new measures. First, focusing on the most impacted group: the PMA users. From June this year, users must have the Certificate of Medical Need to own a PMA, which can only be obtained after completing the Assessment for Mobility Scooter (AMS) from doctors or occupational therapists. Given that these PMA users would need the vehicle for basic mobility, the AMS should and must remain affordable for all. Will MOT be coordinating with MOH and the Ministry of Social and Family Development to ensure accessibility and affordability of these services by public and private GPs and occupational therapists that can offer AMS for existing and also new PMA users? Will there be a fee cap to avoid opportunistic price hiking to obtain the AMS? As users’ medical conditions change over time, it is important to ensure PMA users continue to be fit to operate PMAs to reduce the likelihood of accidents. Assessment to Own does not mean Assessment to Operate.”