Masagos Zulkifli B M M
Singapore
“Coordination between Early Intervention (EI) centres, families and preschools is important for the continuity of support for children with developmental needs.”
“The Taxi Subsidy Scheme supports persons with disabilities (PwDs) who are unable to take public transport, by providing means-tested subsidies to offset the cost of taxi travel to school, work and employment-related training supported by SG Enable.”
“The Skills and Salary Guidelines published by the National Council of Social Service (NCSS) guides social service agencies (SSAs) to pay their employees fair and competitive remuneration and maintain the sector's attractiveness. The Guidelines are adjusted so that salaries remain competitive with comparable roles in competing markets.”
“Staff turnover rates vary across social service agencies (SSAs). An individual's decision to leave an organisation is influenced by a myriad of factors, of which pay is only one.”
“Beyond the requirement of a structured daily programme, community-based SCFA administrators have the flexibility to offer programmes and additional enrichment activities that meet the needs of their students. MSF does not track staff salaries and turnover of SCCs in general nor those that administer SCFA.”
“Male preschool educators comprised about 1% of the early childhood workforce in each of the last five years. The Early Childhood Development Agency (ECDA) has not issued guidelines pertaining to the rules set by preschool centres specific to the conduct of male preschool educators.”
The complete record
Every one of 2,489 lines we hold for Masagos Zulkifli B M M, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 43 of 50.
“Mr Deputy Speaker, MHA supports the Bill. The Member's initiative is a significant effort, given the complex and multifaceted nature of trafficking in persons (TIP). And let me repeat it: this offence is clearly complex and multi-faceted. We thank the Member for advocating more measures to combat TIP and for the inclusive approach that he has adopted in developing the Bill. Not only did the Member engage extensively with various Government agencies, he also mobilised and consulted a wide spectrum of groups, such as civil society, businesses, residents and students, to canvass for ideas and suggestions. Through the process, the Member has raised considerable public awareness on TIP. The Government takes the threat of TIP seriously. The Inter-Agency Taskforce, which my Ministry co-leads with MOM, was established in 2010 to develop a coordinated strategy to combat TIP. As part of its effort, a National Plan of Action, comprising 31 initiatives, was launched in 2012. The Taskforce is also active in regional efforts, as TIP is transnational and close cooperation between countries is necessary to eliminate trafficking at the source as well as the destination. Today, in terms of legislation, we have several laws that contain provisions to criminalise various aspects of human trafficking. These include the Penal Code, Women's Charter, Children and Young Persons Act and the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act. We have also refined these laws progressively and will continue to do so to ensure that they are updated, relevant and support the proposed Bill in dealing with TIP cases. But the Government's approach against TIP is not just about having effective and deterrent laws.”
“We should be mindful about being proactive in offering assistance. This is also to respect our bilateral partners. When I met the Nigerian Minister of State, she did not broach the matter. I think we should respect that.”
“Licensed moneylenders may take reasonable and legal steps to recover their debts. They must not infringe the laws. This could include contacting the borrowers to ask them to return the loan, or taking legal action to enforce the loan contract. However, as to the concerns raised by the Member, we know some moneylenders do resort to such tactics that the Member has alerted us to. Our point is that moneylenders cannot resort to harassment, vandalism, violence or threatening behaviour when recovering debts – the very things that we try to avoid from unlicensed moneylenders. Borrowers who encounter such behaviour should report the matter to the Police for investigation. Indeed, if we find them committing such offences, they will have their licences suspended, or not renewed or revoked by the Registry of Moneylenders. The Member might be happy to note that in June this year, MinLaw formed an advisory committee to review the moneylending regulatory regime and will recommend appropriate measures to strengthen it, including the debt collecting practices.”
“Every road user has a part to play. I have also highlighted the importance of education and enforcement under the broader SRS roadmap. I am thus heartened that Members support the proposed amendments. These amendments will ensure that TP has the necessary legislative levers to continue to keep our roads safe for all road users. With that, Madam, I beg to move. [(proc text) Question put, and agreed to. (proc text)] [(proc text) Bill accordingly read a Second time and committed to a Committee of the whole House. (proc text)] [(proc text) The House immediately resolved itself into a Committee on the Bill. – [Mr Masagos Zulkifli B M M]. (proc text)] [(proc text) Bill considered in Committee; reported without amendment; read a Third time and passed. (proc text)] Page: 76”
“Drivers should also first ensure that it is safe to stop before contacting any other party for assistance or when they want to assist the animals. Nevertheless, we thank Mr Gan for his question and would encourage drivers who hit animals to contact the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Before I conclude, let me address some of the other issues that Mr Ang has raised. I agree with him about the importance of road design in keeping our roads safe. LTA regularly Page: 75 reviews and audits the design of Singapore's roads. For example, LTA's Black Spot Programme tracks locations with a high incidence of traffic accidents and introduces customised road engineering treatments to reduce the number and severity of accidents. Mr Ang has also cited examples of fleet owners that have proactively installed road safety vehicular technologies. These are, indeed, worthy efforts. Such technologies not only improve road safety, but also raise productivity by reducing accidents, downtime, as well as repair, maintenance and insurance costs. The Government has helped to encourage companies adopt such devices. For example, the Singapore Transport Association and SPRING Singapore recently collaborated to launch the Mobileye advanced driver awareness system to about 100 transportation and logistics companies. SPRING provided funding through its Capability Development Grant to help SMEs defray the costs of adopting Mobileye. I hope that more companies will recognise the broader benefits of adopting such vehicular technology. To conclude, Mdm Speaker, I have spoken on the importance of individual and shared responsibility in ensuring that our roads remain safe for all. We have also consulted the Singapore Road Safety Council and Automobile Association of Singapore.”
“This is also why, in response to Mr Lim's comments, the law will apply to all work pass holders, whether they drive full-time or are asked to ferry passengers or goods on an ad hoc basis as part of their work. For example, a warehouse assistant who may have to deliver goods at times as part of his job would still be required to obtain a local licence. Madam, I will now move on to the fourth theme. This pertains to responsible road use. We will introduce the rebuttable presumption regime, which allows TP to presume that a vehicle owner was responsible for the commission of a traffic offence if he does not provide the driver's particulars. I would like to assure Mr Lim that TP endeavours to inform vehicle owners promptly after a traffic offence is detected. TP is also on track in installing almost 260 additional digital red light and speed cameras by the first half of 2015. This will further speed up TP's processing time for these traffic offences. I must emphasise, however, that it is still ultimately the duty of vehicle owners to ensure responsible use of their vehicles, keep track of those who use their vehicles and assist with the administration of justice. They, too, have a part to play in road safety. I would like to thank Mr Gan for supporting the amendment to clarify the expected behaviour of drivers involved in accidents when there is no one else around. He asked particularly if there should be a legal obligation for a driver to contact a relevant agency to treat an animal injured in an accident. The objective of this provision in the RTA is to ensure restitution for victims of accidents – in this case, the owner of the animal.”
“The SDC allows for early intervention and retraining of motorists and will equip motorists with the relevant defensive driving skills. We have made the SDC voluntary rather than mandatory as it is the individual responsibility of each motorist to be proactive in improving his own driving habits. Mr Giam and Mr Lim raised some questions about the licensing requirements for foreign drivers. Singapore is a signatory to international treaties on the recognition of driving licences, which allow Singaporeans holding Singapore-issued licences to drive in other countries. In return, we accord the same privileges to foreigners who are temporarily in Singapore holding driving licences issued by signatory countries. We have also studied the Page: 74 practices of other jurisdictions. Many allow non-tourist foreigners to drive with their foreign licences for a designated period. This can range from a month to 12 months. We have decided on six months, which is consistent with countries like Germany. In enforcing this provision, TP may require an extract of the driving licence records from the overseas licensing authority, for instance, when TP has reason to believe that the licence had been forged or tampered with. Mr Lim commented on the tightened licensing requirements for foreign vocational drivers. Vocational drivers spend long hours on the road and owe a greater duty of care as they may ferry passengers or goods. The policy intent behind our requirement for foreign vocational drivers to obtain a local driving licence is to ensure that they are competent and understand our traffic laws when they drive on our roads.”
“This forms part of TP's overall preventive education efforts that Ms Tin and Mr Kumar asked about. Specifically on public education on the dangers of handphone driving, I think it is important to put this in context. There are many other types of behaviour that contribute to distracted driving, which several Members have alluded to. Mr Ang and Mr Gan will be happy to know that the dangers of handphone driving are already an essential part of TP's general road safety education efforts on distracted driving. Learner motorists are also taught, from the onset, the dangers of distracted driving as part of their basic theory education. Madam, education also plays a key part in ensuring driver competency. I am glad that Mr Ang and Ms Tin support the introduction of the SDC. Mr Ang has suggested that the SDC curriculum should incorporate inputs from behavioural experts and also show videos of road accidents. The SDC was developed by TP's testers, in close collaboration with the driving schools, to focus on correcting bad driving habits. Students will undergo lessons on basic driving theory, including defensive driving, as well as practical driving, before taking the theory and practical tests. They will also view videos on traffic accidents to discuss common mistakes made by motorists and to identify learning points. Mr Lim has asked about the intents of the amendment to section 35A. The amendments to sections 35A and 45 will allow the Minister to prescribe situations where TP will be allowed to cancel demerit points. The intent is to allow TP to recognise good behaviour. The application of these amendments will be confined to situations, such as passing of the SDC, that the Ministry specifically prescribes. It will not apply to appeals for individual cases.”
“In response to Mr Pritam Singh's question, there were 6,527 and 3,220 cases of inconsiderate driving in 2013 and the first half of 2014 respectively. However, TP does not track which cases can be specifically attributed to distracted driving as there may be several factors that can contribute to inconsiderate driving. Madam, a third theme running across several Members' speeches relates to public education and driver competency. Allow me to address these points in turn. Mr Ang and Ms Tin said that education and enforcement need to work in tandem. I agree. They are parts of the mutually reinforcing thrusts under the SRS roadmap. Mr Ang also asked the Government to provide greater support to the Singapore Road Safety Council on its education initiatives. In practice, TP works very closely with the Council and supports many of its outreach efforts, such as annual road safety campaigns. In addition to funding provided by MHA, the Singapore Road Safety Council has also been very active in raising funds from the community and its key stakeholders in support of its efforts. This is Page: 73 encouraging and also reflects the principle of shared responsibility for road safety. Mr Lim asked if we could emphasise road safety education for the vulnerable road users, including students and the elderly. In fact, TP already conducts targeted outreach to educate these vulnerable groups about road safety. In 2013, TP had conducted talks for over 90,000 young and elderly persons and also organised 70 exhibitions for these groups. We will do more. I would also like to inform Mr Kumar that during the engagements with young children, TP also emphasises the importance of wearing seatbelts for child seats.”
“Nonetheless, I would like to emphasise that, regardless of the scope of this offence, it is the individual responsibility of every motorist to display a duty of care on our roads. Mr Zainal and Mr Kumar have asked whether exemptions could be granted, for instance, to allow the use of handphones in emergency situations. As far as possible, motorists, even in emergency situations, should find a place to stop before making the call. Within the Home Team, Police officers who drive or ride alone are required to pull over to the side of the road if they need to use a handphone, even in emergency situations. That said, each case is assessed based on its individual circumstances, no different from how other traffic offences are enforced. Ms Tin Pei Ling and Mr Gan have suggested raising the penalties for the offence, especially for handphone driving. Our assessment is that the current penalties provided within the RTA are sufficient. A motorist who commits this offence will be fined $200 and given 12 demerit points. If he is charged in court, he can face a maximum penalty of $1,000 fine and up to six months' imprisonment as a first-time offender. The maximum penalties for repeat offenders are double that for first-time offenders. These penalties should be seen within the context of the overall increase in TP enforcement which, taken together, serve to deter such behaviour. On the broader issue of distracted driving, TP may take action against motorists for the offence of inconsiderate driving under section 65 of the RTA, as mentioned by Mr Pritam Singh, if they display irresponsible road use behaviour. The offence carries a penalty of up to $1,000 fine and up to six months' imprisonment for first-time offenders convicted in court, who may also face disqualification.”
“Madam, the proliferation in the use of mobile devices, such as handphones, and their expanded range of functions – trends which Ms Tin Pei Ling had also highlighted – explains why we proposed broadening the scope of the handphone driving offence. However, we also recognise that it is neither possible nor practical for the law to specify all the actions and even devices that could potentially distract the driver. Our proposed approach for the handphone driving offence is consistent with that taken in other jurisdictions, such as Hong Kong, which do not permit the use of mobile communication devices while the vehicle is in motion but generally allow the use of hands-free sets and operation of mounted or in-built devices. As Mr Zainal and Mr Kumar have pointed out, other jurisdictions, such as the UK and some Australian states, go a step further to prohibit the use of handphones in stationary vehicles. Mr Zainal had also asked whether we should prohibit driving instructors from using their mobile devices while conducting classes for learner drivers. The driving schools have been advised by TP that their instructors should refrain from doing so when conducting driving classes. This has, indeed, been a longstanding practice. To sum up, with respect to defining the scope of the handphone driving offence, we have deliberately decided to take a measured approach in tightening the rules on handphone driving. But we will continue to monitor this situation after the new changes Page: 72 come into effect and study the practices of other jurisdictions as they evolve to deal with other types of smart devices that are being developed.”
“In response to Mr Gan Thiam Poh's query on how we fare in global rankings on road safety, it is, unfortunately, not meaningful to rely on international rankings for road safety as various jurisdictions adopt different definitions in measuring accident statistics. Instead, it is more important that we keep a close watch over our own accident trends over time and Page: 71 continually review them – review our policies, enforcement and education measures so that we can continue to improve road safety. Madam, I will now move on to address specific questions and comments from Members on enforcement. In particular, many Members have spoken on the expansion of the handphone driving offence and I would like to thank Members for their support. Indeed, many Members have said that we have not gone far enough. But let me clarify that the expanded offence will cover the use of any function of a mobile communicative device. The examples raised by Mr Lim and Mr Gerald Giam – of playing games, reading e-books on a mobile communication device, or reading downloaded emails and documents – will indeed be captured under the new offence if the driver holds the device in one hand while the vehicle is in motion. Several Members, such as Mr Zainal, Mr Pritam Singh, Mr Gan, Mr Giam, Mr Hri Kumar and Mr Lim, have asked whether we should have broadened the scope of the handphone driving offence beyond what has been proposed. As a principle, drivers should be focused on driving and not be distracted at any time. Like Mr Gan, we are just as concerned about distracted driving.”
“Anecdotally, I have been told that motorists have felt this increased presence on the roads and feel safer and more reassured because of this. Mr Lim also mentioned certain hotspots. TP does take into account feedback from the community in the deployment of its enforcement resources. I will also inform TP about the specific areas of concern that the Member has mentioned. Apart from more officers on the roads, TP has also been installing digital red-light and speed cameras – 60 digital red-light cameras have been installed since March 2014. These initiatives will augment TP's enforcement capabilities and allow them to effectively enforce the amendments being discussed today. On education, TP has implemented several initiatives, such as requiring all learner motorcycle riders to take the Expressway Familiarisation Ride course, as well as revising the retraining course for motorists facing their first or second suspensions, to have a more comprehensive curriculum and more stringent passing standards. On the engagement fronts, TP has worked with the Singapore Road Safety Council to launch the Singapore Road Safety Award to recognise fleet owners that are committed to improving road safety. I also chair the Safer Roads Industry Taskforce (SRIT), together with Parliamentary Secretary for Transport Assoc Prof Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim. SRIT is a platform for us to engage key stakeholders, including the private bus operators that Ms Tin Pei Ling spoke about, on road safety initiatives for vocational drivers. Our overall strategy for road safety has served us well. Between 2003 and 2013, our road traffic fatality rate fell by over 40% to 2.9 fatalities per 100,000 persons.”
“Madam, I would like to thank Members who have expressed support for the Bill and their recognition of TP's efforts in keeping our roads safe. At the same time, Members have raised good and pertinent points, which can be grouped into four main themes: first, our overall strategy for road safety; second, the enforcement of traffic offences, in particular, the handphone driving offence; third, public education and driver competency; and, finally, responsible road use. Let me address each of these four main issues before I speak on other specific issues Members have raised. Madam, allow me to begin by reiterating some of the key tenets of our strategy on enhancing road safety. At its core, all road users must exercise individual responsibility to cultivate and practise safe and courteous road use. Laws alone are not enough. Other stakeholders, including the Government and employers, also have a part to play. The SRS Page: 70 initiative, which I mentioned, was launched in 2013 with its three-pronged approach of enforcement, education and engagement so as to engender a culture of safe and courteous road use. Our proposed amendments to the RTA take reference from the SRS roadmap and give some of these initiatives that were previously announced. The implementation of SRS has been progressing well. We have stepped up our tempo of enforcement. Mr Lim Biow Chuan and Mr Zainal Sapari spoke about the importance of effective enforcement. TP has deployed an additional 70 TP officers as well as Auxiliary Police Officers on our roads since 2013. Indeed, Mr Lim's pointing out of the increase in violation is, in no small part, a result of violations alone but also the result of increased enforcement.”
“This gives the DCP broader powers to remove dangerous drivers from our roads, even as investigations are taking place. Madam, in summary, the proposed amendments will strengthen TP's enforcement powers, enhance driver competency, clarify the expected behaviour of vehicle owners and motorists, and update administrative processes to enhance TP's responsiveness. However, individual responsibility is just as important. Motorists need to acquire the necessary skills, hone the right habits and adopt a safety-first mindset. If we all play our part, we can engender a culture of safe and courteous road use, and help reduce the number of accidents on our roads. Mdm Speaker, I beg to move. Question proposed. 3.21 pm”
“Clause 15 amends section 70 to enable TP to require suspected drink-drivers to provide blood specimens to doctors within Police stations, instead of only at hospitals. This will relieve TP of the need to escort arrested persons to the hospital to have their blood specimen taken. To streamline processes, clauses 16 to 19 and 23 to 25 amend the RTA to vest various technical and operational powers, such as the power to approve types of motorcycle helmets and seat belts, in either the Deputy Commissioner of Police or the Registrar of Vehicles, instead of the Minister. Clauses 12 and 27(a) also amend the RTA to designate the Commissioner of Police (CP), instead of the Minister, as the authority to assess appeals relating to the DCP's decisions on driving licences and driving instructor licences, while the Minister will continue to hear appeals related to driving school licences. This amendment will better calibrate the type of Page: 49 appeals reviewed by the Minister, depending on the degree of public impact. Several other amendments update and clarify TP's regulatory powers related to driving licences. Clause 5 amends section 35C to clarify that a person whose driving licence has been revoked is allowed to drive again if he is issued with a new driving licence. Clause 6(c) amends section 36 to remove the requirement for learner motorcycle riders to complete a circuit training programme before obtaining a provisional driving licence. Clause 10 amends section 47C to give the DCP the powers to immediately suspend the licence of a driver involved in a traffic accident who is being investigated for the offence of causing grievous hurt under section 338 of the Penal Code.”
“This amendment reinforces the duty of vehicle owners to ensure responsible use of their vehicles, and to assist with the administration of justice. It will also enhance TP's effectiveness in enforcement, especially for camera-enforced offences where the identity of the driver cannot be ascertained from camera-footage alone. Next, clause 22 amends section 84 to clarify the expected behaviour of drivers involved in accidents. Currently, a driver involved in an accident where damage or injury is caused to any person, vehicle, structure or animal, has to stop. He is then required to provide his particulars, if requested to do so by other persons at the scene of the accident. The amendments retain the requirement for the driver to stop, following an accident. However, they add an obligation on the driver to take reasonable steps to provide his particulars to the owner even when no one is around to request for such information. For example, if a driver hits a car in a carpark, the driver should leave a note on the damaged car with his particulars. In addition, the driver must report the accident to the police as soon as reasonably practicable and within 24 hours unless he is first contacted by the owner. Drivers who fail to take these actions shall be liable for the offence of hit-and-run. Overall, the proposed amendment will facilitate restitution for victims of accidents. Finally, Madam, I will briefly state the other amendments in the Bill that seek to streamline TP's internal processes. Clause 13 amends section 62A to allow the Minister to prescribe in subsidiary legislation the upper age limit for driving heavy vehicles.”
“The SDC will be offered to eligible drivers who have accumulated half or more of their maximum allowable demerit points. However, the SDC will not be offered to probationary drivers who have just obtained their driving licences as we expect new drivers to be more careful on the roads. The SDC also allows for earlier intervention so that we can correct unsafe road habits. To encourage motorists to take this course, those who pass the course will have three demerit points deducted from their record. Clauses 4 and 9 amend sections 35A and 45 respectively to provide the Minister with the power to make rules regulating the disregarding or cancellation of demerit points. This will allow the introduction of the SDC. Madam, everyone has to play a part in ensuring road safety. The third set of amendments will clarify the expected behaviour of vehicle owners and motorists on responsible road use. Clause 20, section 81, introduces a rebuttable presumption regime for selected compoundable and driver-related traffic offences specified in the new Part I of the Third Schedule as amended by clause 26, such as speeding and red-running. Under this regime, the vehicle owner is presumed to have committed the principal offence if he fails to provide TP with the particulars of the driver who had committed the offence. For example, if a vehicle Page: 48 is caught speeding by a speed camera and the owner does not provide the driver's particulars, TP will be empowered to take action against the vehicle owner for the speeding offence. However, the owner can also rebut the presumption by proving that he was not the driver at the time of the offence, such as by showing proof that he was overseas.”
“This licence class will allow the Page: 47 holder to drive all Class 3 vehicles, except light goods vehicles and small buses. To convert to this licence class, the holder needs to pass the Basic Theory Test only. Madam, we have consulted industry associations, such as the Singapore Logistics Association and the Singapore Transport Association, on these changes. To facilitate this transition, existing Work Permit and S Pass holders who hold converted Class 3 licences will, upon application, be issued with Class 3C licences upon the expiry of their current licences. Those who drive light goods vehicles and small buses will be required to take the Practical Driving Test when renewing their licences and they will be given sufficient time to do so. They will then be issued with a full Class 3 licence. These changes will better ensure that these drivers are competent and familiar with driving on our roads. Put together, these changes will ensure that foreign vocational drivers are competent when they drive on our roads. Let me illustrate these changes with an example. A Work Permit holder is hired to drive a light goods vehicle. Prior to the policy changes, he would have been able to drive, with his foreign licence, for up to 12 months upon entering Singapore and then take the Basic Theory Test to convert his foreign licence to a local Class 3 licence. Following the policy changes, he will now have to pass both the Basic Theory Test and Practical Driving Test within six months of obtaining his Work Pass to convert to a local Class 3 licence. Madam, I will now move on to competency for general motorists. TP will introduce a voluntary Safe Driving Course (SDC) in the second half of 2015.”
“To do so, foreign drivers have the option to convert their foreign licences to local ones, after passing the requisite tests. Today, TP allows a person to convert to motorcycle and Class 3 or 3A licences, which are for lighter models of motorcars and other motor vehicles, by passing the Basic Theory Test. We will make two changes to this licensing regime. First, we will repeal and re-enact section 38 of the RTA to require work pass holders, who drive as part of their job, to obtain a local driving licence within six months from the date of issue of their work passes for all licence classes. We have provided for the six-month period after studying the practices of other jurisdictions and taking into account the views of industry stakeholders. These changes will come into effect on 1 January 2016 to give the industry sufficient time for adjustment. However, I encourage all employers to start sending their foreign drivers to obtain local licences prior to that. Fleet operators also have a responsibility to keep our roads safe and, in fact, they should send their foreign drivers to obtain local licences before they are deployed on our roads. I understand that fleet operators do this, like Bok Seng Logistics. I encourage all employers to do the same. Second, we will raise the licence conversion requirements for Work Permit and S Pass holders who drive Class 3 vehicles. The Class 3 licence category allows holders to drive motorcars, light goods vehicles and small buses. They will now be required to pass the Practical Driving Test, in addition to the Basic Theory Test, to convert to a local Class 3 licence. At the same time, we will amend the Road Traffic (Motor Vehicles, Driving Licences) Rules to introduce a new Class 3C licence category from June 2015.”
“In recent years, with technological advancements, smart phones can, among other things, be used to surf the Internet, check email and play games and not just make phone calls. There has also been a proliferation in the types of communication devices, such as tablet computers, that can be just as distracting to the driver. Page: 46 As such, clause 14 of the Bill repeals and re-enacts section 65B to expand the scope of the offence for driving while using a mobile telephone. First, the proposed amendments will clarify that the offence will cover the use of all "mobile communication devices", which includes devices, such as tablet computers. Second, the definition of "use" will be broadened to cover any function of the device, including Internet-surfing, the checking of email or the playing of games. It will be an offence, as long as the device is held in at least one hand, while the vehicle is in motion. Enforcement alone is not sufficient. Motorists must possess the necessary skills to drive safely and exhibit proper behaviour on our roads. As such, the second set of amendments seeks to enhance the competency of motorists, both local and foreign, on our roads. I will start with two key changes we intend to make to the licensing regime for foreign vocational drivers, before addressing the competency of general motorists. Madam, I think it might be useful if I first sketch our current licensing requirements for foreigners, including vocational drivers who drive for work. Today, foreigners are allowed to drive in Singapore using their foreign licences for up to 12 months from their date of last entry into Singapore. They need to obtain a local driving licence to continue driving thereafter.”
“Mdm Speaker, I beg to move, "That the Bill be now read a Second time." Madam, our road safety situation has improved over the years, with a 13% decline in the number of fatal accidents since 2009. Nonetheless, accidents on our roads can and should be prevented. We introduced the Safer Roads Singapore (SRS) action plan in 2013 with the three-pronged approach of education, engagement and enforcement. The SRS is a continuation of Traffic Police's (TP) long-standing efforts to inculcate responsible road use for all road users. I am glad to see our partners, such as the Singapore Road Safety Council, actively supporting the SRS objective of engendering a culture of safe road use in Singapore. As part of this effort, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has reviewed the Road Traffic Act (RTA) to ensure it remains relevant and that we continue to have the necessary enforcement and regulatory powers to ensure that our roads stay safe. The proposed amendments will (i) strengthen the TP's enforcement powers, (ii) enhance competency of drivers, (iii) clarify the expected behaviour of vehicle owners and motorists on responsible road use, and (iv) streamline administrative processes. I will address each of these four areas in turn. First, we intend to strengthen TP's enforcement powers to ensure that TP can deal effectively with errant behaviour on the roads. MHA first introduced the offence of driving while using a mobile telephone, or more commonly referred to as "handphone driving", in 1999. This prohibits a driver from holding a mobile telephone and using it to communicate with another person while the vehicle is in motion. The number of violations for this offence has risen by almost 25% over the last five years from 2,867 violations in 2009 to 3,572 violations in 2013.”
“What they are doing is they are trying to promote and enhance awareness to adopt essential Infocomm Security practices so that it is not just being done at the individual basis but also in companies, in any other set-ups that involve the use of IT. Currently, this is co-chaired by the Deputy Chief Executive and Director-General (Telecoms & Post) of Infocomm Development Authority (IDA) and the Vice-Chairman of Singapore Infocomm Technology Federation. The Police is part of this initiative.”
“The first question on whether existing laws are adequate, yes, they are. We do, however, need to continue monitoring and updating them, as these kinds of crimes do evolve over time. In the past, there was no such crime of extorting people through the Internet. But now, there are such crimes. And the victims may be in Singapore but the perpetrators may be overseas. Certainly, the best approach is prevention. The victims themselves are the people who are using all these media. They must be always aware that they can be victims of cybercrime. Are there efforts to collect data and transform them into actionable plans? Yes, there are. This is continual, as I have mentioned before. We work together with international organisations like INTERPOL to make sure that we have a bigger global view of the issue, and not just what is happening in Singapore. Should we have other channels to allow people to make reports? Well, we are mindful that we do not want to create more channels even though it may be particularly for online scams or Internet cybercrime. There are already existing ones through our NPCs, through our NPPs; even online reporting that our citizens and our visitors can assess. Do we work with experts? Yes, we do. In fact, they regularly come to advise us, we also invite them to run workshops with our regular police forces, as well as to involve other police forces in other countries to ensure that we are working together and on the same page. It also heightens our awareness of the vulnerability of our citizens to this new crime. And then, there is a cybersecurity awareness alliance which comprises 21 representatives from the Government and private enterprises, including even trade associations and non-profit organisations.”
“I thank the Member for the supplementary questions. Firstly, certainly, this is a very new phenomenon in our society, where because of the "ubiquitousness" of the Internet, multimedia devices are all over the place, sometimes even at our dinner table, this is now a means and access for criminals to perpetrate their crimes. Therefore, our own forces in the Police have had to upgrade themselves to understand the nature of these crimes and how they are perpetrated, including working with their foreign counterparts. As the Member rightly pointed out, this is not a crime just perpetrated within Singapore. Indeed, most of them have been perpetrated overseas. Therefore, we have to work regionally as well as internationally, including with INTERPOL, who have just set up their INTERPOL Global Complex for Innovation (IGCI) recently in Singapore. With INTERPOL and all these regional counterparts, we hope to address these issues together.”
“Thank you. For the six-month period between January and June 2014, there were 787 reported online cheating and cyber extortion cases. In the same period in 2013, there were 187 such cases. The rise in the number of police reports could be partly due to greater public awareness and willingness to report such crimes. A key strategy to reduce the number of online crimes is to raise public awareness and vigilance. To this end, the Police have worked with the community and key stakeholders to increase public education of online crimes through mainstream and social media. For example, Police have highlighted cases of online purchase and identity theft scams in the upcoming episodes of CrimeWatch this year. The Police and the National Crime Prevention Council (NCPC) have jointly developed public education collaterals pertaining to online crimes for display on bus stop panels, at MRT stations and over the Internet, including online forums and shopping sites. Police are also working with major financial institutions to feature crime prevention advisories on their Internet banking websites by end-2014. Members of the public are encouraged to contact the Police immediately should they become victims of any crime, be it online or otherwise. This can be done through existing crime reporting channels, such as the Neighbourhood Police Centres (NPCs) and Neighbourhood Police Posts (NPPs), as well as Police's online reporting portal. Page: 33”
“I think we have to separate the issues around legalities between what we have to settle and the commercial exposure that residents have to make on their own, bearing in mind what they will bear in future or not. I think that is not the Government's mandate to tell them. The people must be open-minded and must know what they are into and understand the situation as it develops.”
“The consultation generally takes place yearly. But it does not prevent us from asking for clarification and to have meetings if it is urgently needed. Er Dr Lee Bee Wah (Nee Soon): Mdm Speaker, many of my residents are very disappointed with Malaysia's reclamation work in the Johor Straits. I would like to ask the Page: 19 Senior Minister of State: is it possible to urge Singaporeans not to buy any project at this Forest City project?”
“As I had mentioned to Dr Lim Wee Kiak, the boundaries between our two countries do not change, whatever reclamation works are done by one country or another. While I am not sure how much is the distance from the proposed reclaimed land to Singapore, I will wait for the information to be more apparent, when it is given to us. On the second question, whether there is any more reclamation land by ourselves, I am not aware of this. I think the right authority would answer this, if a Parliamentary Question (PQ) is submitted. On whether the agreement on the 2003 dispute is used, indeed, it sets a precedent for both countries to work together and to consult each other on any reclamation work that each other does in the Straits of Johor, whether in the east or west of the Straits.”
“I thank the Member for the supplementary questions. I think it is too premature to talk about any development at this stage and we must not to be hypothetical about it. We must let consultations and information exchange go forward, and to study them first before we hypothesise what we will do or what they will do, and what can happen in the future. Page: 18 On the second question, the boundary lines between any countries have already been fixed. Unless there are disputes, they have to be settled. Between Singapore and Malaysia, it is very much settled. Whatever reclamation each country does, does not change the boundary lines between the two countries.”
“Because of these potential transboundary impacts on Singapore, we have requested Malaysia to suspend reclamation works until Singapore had received and studied all the Page: 17 relevant information. On 30 June 2014, Malaysia responded with some preliminary general information on the proposed reclamation projects for Forest City and R&F Princess Cove. Malaysia promised to share all other information, including the EIAs, once their relevant internal processes are completed. Malaysia has stated that no reclamation works are currently being undertaken on these projects, and that it remains committed to fulfilling its obligations under international law and will take all necessary measures to avoid any adverse transboundary impact. We welcome Malaysia's cooperation on this matter and look forward to receiving the rest of the information we requested as soon as possible. We are also seeking further clarifications on some of the information that Malaysia provided. In the meantime, we will study the information provided and conduct the necessary studies to ascertain how this project will impact Singapore. Mdm Speaker, in the spirit of bilateral cooperation between our two countries, we remain committed to working together with Malaysia to address our concerns over the possible transboundary impacts of Malaysia's reclamation projects. In this regard, we have proposed to hold consultations with Malaysia so that both sides can further discuss and exchange information on these projects.”
“In this regard, we have, on a number of occasions, registered our concerns with Malaysia regarding these projects. We have requested for all relevant information on all their reclamation and construction works, including the EIA reports and projected timelines for their completion, for our further study and consideration. These were conveyed through letters from NEA to its Malaysian counterpart and through third party notes, which are formal diplomatic correspondence between governments. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong spoke and wrote to Prime Minister Najib Razak on this matter. Minister for National Development Mr Khaw Boon Wan also wrote to his co-chair of the Malaysia-Singapore Joint Ministerial Committee for Iskandar Malaysia, Minister in the Malaysian Prime Minister's Office Dato' Seri Abdul Wahid Omar, to express Singapore's concerns. Our concerns have also been expressed to other Malaysian ministerial colleagues. This issue was also discussed at the Malaysia-Singapore Joint Committee on the Environment Working Group meeting in Malaysia in May 2014. In our communications with Malaysia, we have conveyed our concerns that the reclamation projects could lead to an increase in the current velocity in the Straits of Johor. In turn, this could affect safety of navigation in the Straits, as well as increased erosion to the seabed and foreshore defences that support the infrastructure for the Second Link and Singapore's shoreline. The reclamation projects could also result in changes in the morphology and water quality in the Straits of Johor which directly affect Singapore's coastal and marine environment, as well as fish farms and other facilities in the East and West Johor Straits.”
“Mdm Speaker, Singapore is very concerned about the potential transboundary impact on Singapore from reclamation projects in Malaysia that are in close proximity to Singapore. Countries are obliged under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), and general international law, not to cause harm or permit activities within their jurisdiction to cause transboundary harm to their neighbours. In the present case, this would include Malaysia not permitting reclamation activities of this scale and nature to take place so close to the international boundary with Singapore without first conducting an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Where such Page: 16 assessments indicate that any damage may be of a transboundary nature affecting Singapore, Malaysia has a duty to consult Singapore. If damage to our environment has been caused or is imminent, Malaysia has a duty to immediately notify Singapore. Countries are also obligated to work closely on such matters and to share any relevant information with each other. Apart from the UNCLOS and general international law, under the 2005 Reclamation Case Settlement Agreement between Singapore and Malaysia, both Singapore and Malaysia are obliged to monitor our respective environments in the Straits of Johor, share information and address any adverse impacts, if necessary. There are two reclamation projects in question. The first is by Country Garden Holdings Co Ltd and Kumpulan Prasarana Rakyat Johor in the western Straits of Johor, also known as Forest City; and the second is by Guangzhou R&F Properties Co Ltd in the vicinity of Johor's old Customs, Immigration and Quarantine Complex by the Causeway, also known as R&F Princess Cove. Singapore was not given prior information on these reclamation projects.”
“These passports comply with the International Civil Aviation Organization's (ICAO) recommendations and requirements, including security standards to ensure the integrity of biometric Page: 18 passports. It is an offence under the Passports Act not to report any loss of passport. A Singapore passport is an important document and highly valued by local and foreign criminals. During the passport application and collection process, and in public outreach and community engagement through talks and exhibitions, ICA constantly reminds Singaporeans of the importance of safe-keeping their passports and the need to report any loss of their passports immediately. ICA maintains our security with tight controls at our borders over persons who present stolen or lost passports. At the same time, the security features of our Singapore biometric passport, and the education efforts and strict enforcement of laws regarding lost and stolen passports, help ensure that Singaporeans who travel, face fewer queries and delays due to inquiries regarding their passports.”
“All persons entering or leaving Singapore are subject to stringent checks at the checkpoints, which include travel document examination and identity verification. There are several layers of checks to detect stolen or fraudulent passports. ICA actively taps into its network of global partners to exchange information on lost and stolen travel documents to prevent undesirable persons from using such documents. Since 2008, ICA has been using the INTERPOL's database containing over 40 million travel documents reported lost or stolen by 167 countries, in the passport document examination process. Singapore is one of several INTERPOL member states that cross-check travellers' passports against this database, accessing it about 29 million times a year, to determine if a passport presented had been reported lost or stolen. Over the past five years, about 7,000 Singapore passports are reported lost or stolen each year. Once a report is received, ICA will immediately cancel any reported lost or stolen passport, update its database and convey the relevant information to INTERPOL. Over the past five years, across all our checkpoints, an average of about 350 travellers per year have been detected to be in possession of forged or tampered travel documents, or had presented a travel document that did not belong to him or her. Under section 47 of the Passports Act, anyone found guilty of offences relating to false foreign travel documents shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $10,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years or to both. To deter forgery or tampering with Singapore passports, Singapore is one of many countries which have issued new passports with stronger security and protection features, such as biometrics.”
“ICA will study the viability of introducing another NRIC re-registration after the age of 30, so that the information captured will be up-to-date. This is especially relevant with longer life expectancy. ICA will also consider a waiver of the NRIC replacement fees for those who face financial difficulties or if their NRICs were damaged due to situations beyond their control, such as accidents or fires. Mdm Chair, the safety and security we enjoy in Singapore do not come about by chance. We all have a part to play. MHA will continue to be vigilant in the fight against drugs and crime. Together with our community partners, we will strengthen and enhance our capabilities and programmes to remain ready for the challenges ahead. Page: 95”
“As mentioned earlier by Deputy Prime Minister, cybersecurity is important for us, especially given our inter-connectedness. Hence, we have Page: 94 taken a comprehensive approach to ensure the security and integrity of our databases. First, there are strict controls to ensure that only designated individuals have access to data. These officers are then only allowed to access data that is required for their specific operational need. Our servers are also protected by physical and software measures which are on par with international security standards. These measures are able to quickly detect hacking and raise alerts such that remedial action can be taken immediately. For all the processes I have mentioned, we conduct regular audits and reviews to ensure compliance. Finally, ICA has a business continuity plan for biometric systems to ensure that critical systems are able to function, even if there is a disruption. We note Mr Low's comments and we will continually review our security policies to ensure that the integrity of personal data is safeguarded. Nevertheless, it is also important for individuals to be alert and careful about sharing personal information and details in cyberspace. 3.30 pm Mr Baey Yam Keng suggested that we replace NRICs at intervals of 20 years for security and other functional reasons. The current practice for Singapore residents is to register for an NRIC at 15 years old, and undergo a re-registration at the age of 30 where they will provide an updated photograph. Since the introduction of the current type of NRIC in 1991, the vast majority of them have remained in good condition after more than 20 years of use. Nevertheless, Mr Baey's suggestion is a valid one.”
“The second aspect is partnership in action. Residents play a vital role in helping to keep their neighbourhoods safe and secure. Grassroots leaders, volunteers and residents have also taken the initiative to assist Police in the forming of Neighbourhood Watch Groups (NWGs) and Citizens-on-Patrol (COP) groups. To date, more than 7,000 NWGs and 600 COPs have been formed island-wide, helping to watch over their communities and keep them safe and secure. There are also members of the community who do more and regularly serve alongside us in the Civil Defence Auxiliary Unit, Volunteer Special Constabulary and Community Emergency Response Teams. The effectiveness of the Home Team is the sum total of the efforts of our individual Departments and our partnerships with the community. These community partnerships create a multiplier effect that amplifies the Home Team's ability to keep Singapore safe and secure. Having the right mindset is important. Today, you may be doing your part to help a neighbour in need. Tomorrow, someone else may be doing likewise for you. The Home Team will continue to deepen our engagement with the community, expand the scale and scope of some of the programmes I have just mentioned, and explore new areas of collaboration. I hope that many more will step forward and join us in this endeavour. Let me now touch on two other issues that Members have raised. Mr Low Thia Khiang has asked about the security and integrity of the Home Team's biometric databases. MHA uses biometric technology and systems for various applications in areas, such as traveller clearance at the Checkpoints. We recognise the need to safeguard the security and integrity of our Home Team databases.”
“We are fortunate that the Home Team can rely on the partnership and involvement of people from all walks of life to keep Singapore safe and secure. They complement our work and are critical in rallying the community quickly when crisis strikes. Our philosophy is that a community comprising individuals committed to the well-being of society, equipped with training and skills, is best placed to take ownership of local issues and assist each other in times of need. We will continue to build on these partnerships. There are two aspects to our work with the community. First, equipping and engaging. As a starting point, it is important that we equip the community with the relevant information, skills and tools. I am glad to note that many students are coming on board to be equipped with emergency preparedness skills and help share what they have learnt with their fellow schoolmates through the SCDF's Junior Lionhearters' Programme. This was launched in April 2013 to cultivate young ambassadors who generate interest and awareness among their schoolmates, friends and Page: 93 families on the importance of emergency preparedness and the need to take individual ownership. In the case of the Police, they work with schools in the Youth Engagement Programme, which plans activities to engage youths and steer them away from trouble and crime. A very good example of this is the Delta League. Since 2011, the National Crime Prevention Council and Police have organised this community football programme where youths are engaged in sports and other meaningful activities. But off the pitch, the youths interact with Police officers and life coaches, as well as take part in community activities. To date, close to 4,000 youths have participated and benefited from the Delta League.”
“This was a 23% increase from 2012. The support from employers to help ex-offenders stay in a job is an important part of our strategy to help ex-offenders rehabilitate and reintegrate into society. Accommodation and family support are also important factors that support ex-offenders' reintegration efforts. In this regard, the Yellow Ribbon Community Project (YRCP) plays a crucial role in helping families of incarcerated offenders during their term of imprisonment. Piloted in 2010 in just seven grassroots divisions, the YRCP helps these families link up with relevant Government agencies for social assistance and support. They conduct house visits and help to ensure that the bonds between the families and the incarcerated offenders remain intact and that the ex-offender then has a home and family to return to upon release. As of today, the YRCP has expanded to 60 grassroots divisions all over Singapore, involving more than 500 volunteers. Over 1,600 families have benefited from this initiative. In 2014, we will broaden its coverage and extend the YRCP to more divisions. In 2013, we celebrated the 10th anniversary of the Yellow Ribbon Project (YRP). The YRP has helped raise awareness about the challenges of reintegration, increase the acceptance of ex-offenders and inspire action in the community. Since inception, more than 420,000 members of the community have participated in various Yellow Ribbon activities, such as the Yellow Ribbon Prison Run and Yellow Ribbon Concert. The YRP has also partnered close to 1,000 community agencies and schools to organise and run activities for ex-offenders. Volunteers and community support are not limited to the rehabilitation sector.”
“Besides individual counselling and group work, families of these youths are also involved in their rehabilitation. We will continue to finetune this programme as we believe these low-risk young abusers, with sufficient support, have a good chance of turning over a new leaf and staying away from drugs. Later this year, a Community Rehabilitation Centre for moderate-risk youths will commence operations. It is a residential programme that allows youths to continue their schooling and employment in the day, before returning for counselling and programmes. Let me touch now on partnering the community to keep Singapore safe and secure. Keeping Singapore safe and secure is a whole-of-community effort that requires support from all stakeholders, as Mr Hri Kumar and Ms Tin Pei Ling have pointed out. Please allow me to provide some updates on how we work with volunteers and the community to prevent re-offending, as well as in other areas. In our work with ex-offenders, we have found that securing employment, finding accommodation and having support from the family and community are all critical factors in helping ex-offenders reintegrate into society. Ex-offenders who are gainfully employed are less likely to re-offend. The Singapore Corporation of Rehabilitative Enterprises (SCORE) prepares offenders for employment by providing them with training that is accredited by the Workforce Development Agency (WDA), and other market-relevant skills before their release. SCORE has steadily built up a network of over 3,800 employers from various fields, such as logistics, manufacturing and food and beverage industries, who are all willing to offer ex-offenders a second chance. In 2013, SCORE helped more than 2,000 offenders secure employment before Page: 92 their release.”
“It is important that we address drug abuse as upstream as possible, which is why youths are a key target segment. CNB uses a range of platforms and works with various stakeholders, such as educators and parents, to outreach to them. Apart from mainstream media, CNB has been using social media sites like FaceBook, YouTube and Instagram to disseminate this information. In April 2013, we launched a youth-oriented blog (LiveItLoud.Sg) to promote a healthy and drug-free lifestyle. It takes on a more personal approach and youth-centred content and popular guest bloggers, and has more than 4,000 unique visitors to date. We also recognise the important and complementary role that parents can play in speaking to their children, all through the various phases in their life, guiding them to the right information and keeping them away from drugs. A recent survey by the National Council against Drug Abuse (NCADA) found that Page: 91 the majority or 96% of youths who spoke to their parents about drugs and drug abuse were more likely to be deterred from taking drugs. Over the course of the year, CNB will be covering topics, such as the effects of drugs and the importance of family support in popular local magazines like Manja, I-Weekly, 8 Days and NTUC Lifestyle. CNB is also working with MOE to feature e-articles with anti-drug information for parents on platforms, such as the Edumall and Parents in Education portals, and individual school websites. We have also strengthened early intervention programmes for young drug abusers of various profiles. For example, we collaborated with MSF to introduce casework and counselling for young first-time drug abusers since July 2013 as part of an enhanced supervision scheme. To date, 28 youths aged 14 to 20 have benefited from this.”
“We are studying the reasons for this increase. One reason could be misperception that young persons have about drugs. When arrested, many Ice Page: 90 and cannabis users say they took these drugs because they assumed they could control their addiction. They can try it just once and then they can stop thereafter. Please let me make this clear. There is no such thing as "lifestyle" drugs. One cannot experiment with drugs and not expect to get hooked. Ice and cannabis are no less addictive and dangerous than the drugs we have seen in the past. They can lead to a lifetime of drug dependency, damage our bodies and, in some cases, result in death. From time to time, we also read stories about how drugs have claimed the lives of celebrities everywhere. Every time this happens is an opportunity for the media and the entertainment industry to step up and rally against drug taking and its harmful and potentially deadly consequences. Indeed, what has been happening is that we mourn their death and, worse, sometimes continued to produce materials that promote drug taking. For ourselves, we should send a clear message to the young to always to say "no" to drugs. Therefore, I am glad that Singaporeans understand this and support our tough zero-tolerance stance against drug abuse. Our approach to the drug problem is a comprehensive one, comprising targeted prevention, strong enforcement and detection, upstream intervention for drug abusers, and supervision and rehabilitation to reduce re-offending. I would like to touch on how we have been applying this approach, particularly to youths and first-time abusers. CNB adopts a calibrated and targeted approach in its Preventive Drug Education initiatives, or what we call "PDE".”
“Mdm Chairperson, I will now speak on our fight against drugs, strategies to prevent reoffending and efforts to strengthen community relationships. Mr Vikram Nair and Mr Alvin Yeo have asked for updates on the local drug situation, especially among youths, and our plans to counter these threats. When discussing the local drug situation, it is important to first set the context. The regional drug situation is expected to worsen, with reports of higher production, trafficking and consumption of heroin and amphetamine derivatives. International drug syndicates are also targeting the region. The attack by the suppliers has been relentless. 3.15 pm We are monitoring these trends closely because even though the situation in Singapore is contained, the unfavourable regional situation poses a challenge to our efforts to combat drugs. This is evident from local drug seizures. In 2013, CNB seized 72 kg of heroin. What does this amount to? What does this mean? This amount is sizeable because it can potentially feed the drug habit of around 8,000 abusers for 30 days. That is more people than those detained in our Prisons today for drug abuse. This is also a 150% increase from five years ago. There have been similar increases in cannabis and methamphetamine seizures in recent years. As pointed out by Mr Vikram Nair and Mr Alvin Yeo, drugs such as methamphetamine, more commonly known as Ice, and cannabis, which some may perceive as "party" drugs or "lifestyle" drugs, have now gained popularity of late. Arrests of methamphetamine and cannabis abusers increased in 2013 when compared to the year before. Between them, they account for 73% of new abusers arrested in 2013 and nearly 64% of new abusers arrested were below the age of 30. This is a serious concern.”
“Our ability to seize opportunities and foster cooperation with these emerging markets will give Singapore additional avenues for growth. I will now hand over to Senior Parliamentary Secretary Sam Tan who will respond to questions on Singapore's technical assistance and MFA's consular assistance to Singaporeans.”
“This contribution was highlighted when I attended the second Conference on Cooperation among East Asian Countries for Palestinian Development in Jakarta, where I also met Palestinian Prime Minister Rami Hamdallah and welcomed more Palestinian officials to visit Singapore under the enhanced package. We offered further help and cooperation, including water management and public administration. Besides the Middle East, we have stepped up our engagement of other emerging markets, such as Turkey – where we opened an Embassy in 2012 – Africa, and Latin America, to expand Singapore's economic footprint. In January 2014, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan made an official visit to Singapore, where the commencement of negotiations on a comprehensive Singapore-Turkey Free Trade Agreement was announced. This is a significant development in bilateral relations. Africa continues to feature on our radar as we look beyond traditional investment destinations. I visited South Africa and Nigeria in May 2013 and was impressed by the rapid economic growth and pace of development in the continent. We must not miss out on this. We are also watching Latin America closely. Our trade with this fast-growing region reached about S$37 billion in 2013. Minister Shanmugam has visited Brazil and Peru and, in July 2013, we hosted Ministers from 10 Caribbean countries for the inaugural CARICOM High-Level Ministerial Exchange Visit. Indeed, many Latin American countries are looking for opportunities to participate in Asia's robust growth. Notably, as of 2013, cumulative foreign Page: 144 direct investments from the region into Singapore amounted to S$25 billion.”
“Mr Chairman, Mr Alex Yam asked about the state of Singapore's engagement of the Middle East, in view of political developments in the region, and Singapore's engagement of emerging markets, of which I will touch on Africa and Latin America. We have focused our efforts on the Gulf countries, many of which we have established institutional platforms with, such as the UAE, Qatar, as well as Oman, where we have recently established a Consulate-General in Muscat, Oman. Last year, between our officeholders, we visited Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, Qatar, UAE, Oman and Bahrain. And recently, Minister visited Iran. Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean also visited Abu Dhabi in January 2014. Singapore also welcomed Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Abdullah Bin Nasser Bin Khalifa Al-Thani in November last year and His Majesty King Abdullah [II] Page: 143 recently in February this year. Our economic ties with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) are strong. Last year, trade between Singapore and the GCC totalled about S$64 billion and, with the coming into force of the GCC-Singapore Free Trade Agreement in September 2013, we will further expand our economic links with the region. At the regional level, Singapore has worked with ASEAN to build closer links with the GCC. In addition to these political and economic engagements, we have shared our development experiences with the Middle East. For example, Singapore contributes to the Palestinian National Authority's capacity building efforts under our Technical Assistance Package.”
“Indeed, these are the kind of cases that cause the delays. Sometimes, there are disputes as to what happened, a dispute as to whether he himself was driving or he disputes that he was actually driving. That is why it becomes protracted. Fortunately for us, this makes up a very small percentage of such offences.”
“Mdm Speaker, 98% of all offences would have the notices issued within seven days. The rest of them would have to be issued quickly but, unfortunately, for this very small number – the 900 of them, Page: 8 or 0.15% – could not get to the offender as quickly as possible. Unfortunately, the Police has no power to forgive the offence and, certainly, this discretion should not be given to them. They will have to consult AGC, or by legislation, in order to waive such an offence.”
“Madam, I beg to move the amendment* standing in my name, as indicated in the Order Paper Supplement. [(proc text) *The amendment read as follows: (proc text)] [(proc text) In page 54, line 2, after "conviction", to insert "and sentence of imprisonment (excluding a default sentence), corrective training, preventive detention or reformative training". (proc text)] The amendment tightens the definition of antecedent to exclude convictions for which only a default sentence was given. [(proc text) Amendment agreed to. (proc text)] [(proc text) Clause 19, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill. (proc text)] [(proc text) Clauses 20 to 22 inclusive ordered to stand part of the Bill. (proc text)] [(proc text) The Schedule ordered to stand part of the Bill. (proc text)] [(proc text) Bill reported with amendments, read a Third time and passed. (proc text)]”