Muhamad Faisal Bin Abdul Manap
Singapore
“Sir, I believe that the Minister did not answer quite a number of my questions. But due to time factors, I will submit a Parliamentary Question. Nonetheless, I have two clarifications. One, on the full-time madrasahs.”
“Is MOH looking into more aggressively hiring junior doctors, especially those that have left the public healthcare system? How do they intend to do so? Will it include increasing doctor's salaries to better compete with the private sectors and, if so, how much?”
“Sir, actually, I have written to SFA and they have actually replied to me recently. I just want to get a better clarification on the issues. What happened was that there is this issue that has been going on for about 10 years where the bakery located in the same block, a four-storey HDB block, has been emanating noise, heat and pungent sm…”
“What are SFA's requirements for bakeries to operate in a HDB residential block emitting the noise and heat levels resulting from their daily operations?”
“Sir, earlier in my speech, I have sought two clarifications on my cuts pertaining to ventilation systems for bakeries in order to better manage the disamenities caused by bakeries located in the HDB blocks. I really have not received a reply on this from the Ministry.”
“Sir, on the contrary, the implication of not approving LTVP+ applications for both these groups is that their lives will become more challenging and it will further complicate their lives. I would like to request that ICA exercise greater flexibility to applicants who are facing the two situations that I mentioned.”
The complete record
Every one of 597 lines we hold for Muhamad Faisal Bin Abdul Manap, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 1 of 12.
“Madam, in June 2024, MyActiveSG+ was launched. The web-based platform was meant to address the problems faced by users in booking sport facilities. Since the platforms launched, there have been problems with transferring of credits from the previous MyActiveSG apps, access to facilities by children and accompanied by their parents and with payment issues. I seek an update on whether these dealing issues have been ironed out. On a more concerning note, there was a commentary carried by CNA in November 2024 on the appearance of badminton groups organising games in exchange for a fee from participants. Individuals interviewed for the piece expressed their unhappiness over having to pay the host who organised badminton games, but at the same time will also resign to the realities that these groups leveraged on their members to secure slots at facilities, something that is more difficult for an individual on their own. Madam, I note that actions have been taken against the use of boards and scripting in the booking process, but the problem of securing booking at sports facilities as badminton courts remain prevalent. I urge MCCY, SportSG and stakeholders to look into improving the booking process further. ActiveSG”
“I think the madrasahs should expand. But will MUIS work with the madrasahs to deal with this problem, meaning the shortage of places for Primary 1?”
“Just asking whether MUIS can work with the full-time madrasahs to expand the number of intakes.”
“Sir, I believe that the Minister did not answer quite a number of my questions. But due to time factors, I will submit a Parliamentary Question. Nonetheless, I have two clarifications. One, on the full-time madrasahs. If I were to hear the Minister mentioned correctly just now that there are 400 places every year for Primary 1 enrolment and, at this point in time, almost every year, we have a double application for that 400 places. So, can I seek a clarification from the Minister whether does he MUIS to work with the full-time madrasahs to increase the number of Primary 1 places in these full-time madrasahs? Secondly, regarding the Mosque Executive Chairmen (MEC), I just want to clarify whether is the proportion still the same where 20% of MEC's salary comes from MUIS and the other 80% comes from the mosque? I just want to clarify that.”
“And if possible, can the Minister share what is the monthly income of the Mosque Executive Chairman (MEC)? Sir, the second matter pertains to Warees Halal Limited. The website of Warees Halal Limited states that it is a not-for-profit company limited by guarantee, as a subsidiary of MUIS Group whose focus is on providing Halal services and not on generating profits. My questions are as follows: (i) what are the annual revenue, expenses and net income of Warees Halal between 2020 to 2024; and (ii) what are Warees Halal’s plans to meet the increasing demand for halal services in the medium term? Sir, the next matter is regarding the Asatizah Recognition Scheme (ARS). I would like to ask the following: (i) how many asatizah are registered under the ARS to date; (ii) what is the total number based on gender, that is, Ustaz and Ustazah; (iii) what is the number of cases where the accreditation was withdrawn or cancelled since this scheme was established, and if there are any, what are the reasons for the cancellation of accreditation; and (iv) how many asatizah under ARS currently are from the Sunni and Syiah schools of thought? Sir, the last matter is about full-time madrasahs. Before I continue, I would like to declare that I have a child studying in a full-time madrasah in Singapore. Sir, my question is, what is the annual Primary 1 intake for full-time madrasahs for 2022, 2023 and 2024; and my second question is how many Primary 1 registration applications were received on those years?”
“Chairman, in Malay. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Sir, I would like to seek clarification and elaboration on four matters concerning the Malay/Muslim community in Singapore. These matters are: (i) the construction and management of mosques; (ii) Warees Halal Limited; (iii) the Asatizah Recognition Scheme (ARS); and (iv) full-time madrasahs. Sir, the Muslim community, especially those living in Tampines North and western Pasir Ris areas, like myself, warmly welcome the recent announcement on the resumption of plans and efforts to build a mosque in the Tampines North HDB estate. I would like to seek clarification on why the decision to build this mosque was delayed for nine years even though the announcement was first made in 2015, five years before the COVID-19 pandemic happened. Secondly, with the increasing number of HDB blocks under the BTO scheme in existing estates as well as the development of new HDB estates, I would like to ask the Minister, what are the factors considered by MUIS in its decision to add a second mosque in existing HDB housing estates like Tampines, and the construction of mosques in new HDB housing estates, such as Tengah and upcoming HDB estates like Bayshore. Sir, I will next touch on the administration of mosques. My first question: how many mosques are currently under the management of Executive Chairmen (MEC) and how many are under the management of non-Executive Chairmen? During the 2012 Committee of Supply debates, in replying to my query, the Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs at that time said that MUIS bears or pays 20% of the Executive Chairman's monthly salary and the remainder is paid by the mosque. My question is, has this percentage remained constant or has it changed?”
“Is MOH looking into more aggressively hiring junior doctors, especially those that have left the public healthcare system? How do they intend to do so? Will it include increasing doctor's salaries to better compete with the private sectors and, if so, how much? Madam, I would close by saying, just because generations of doctors have survived such conditions is no excuse for MOH to continue to perpetuate such attitudes and working conditions. Should we not strive to be a society that is kinder and more compassionate, especially to those that care for us? Provide Nurses More Rest Time”
“Some indeed may be capable of operating at such an intense level for prolonged periods of time, but I believe many are not. Do we want our doctors that have been consistently overworked to attend to our sick parents and children in their hours of need? Do we want doctors that are stressed to make decision that can literally involve life and death? The same survey mentioned earlier found a significant correlation between the number of medical errors made with the amount of additional clinical hours worked per week. I note that in many parents' guides that MOH publishes, they emphasise the importance of parents being heavily involved in their children's life for children's health development. Many junior doctors in the public healthcare system are bonded and do not have the option of quitting if they are unable to deal with the stress and workload. They have no recourse and are forced to make choices that compromise their family time. Is it not ironic that even MOH, as MOH puts out these guidelines, their own doctors are unable to follow them due to the amount of hours they need to put into work? Madam, the current system to me does not seem sustainable. As the workload of junior doctors increases, many choose to leave the public healthcare system for better pay and lesser working hours. This only serves to aggravate the workload of the remaining doctors, leading to a self-reinforcing cycle. To me, MOH must intervene fast and decisively to change the system. Madam, Minister Ong mentioned in May 2024 that the National Wellness Committee on Junior Doctors has finalised its recommendation and are now progressively implementing them. Are the details of this recommendation and findings going to be made public?”
“Madam, I would like to address the issue of the workload of junior doctors. MOH has mentioned on 10 January 2024 in Parliament, that their guideline for junior doctors stipulates that, when average out over a month, the total work hours per week of junior doctors should not exceed 80 hours. Thus, over an average month of four weeks, the total work hours should not exceed 320 hours. Anecdotally, I hear that many junior doctors, particularly in our acute hospitals, regularly hitting or coming close to this limit. A nationwide survey published in the Journal of the Academy of Medicine Singapore, in 2023, reports that junior doctors work an average of 71 hours a week, which adds up to 284 hours on an average month. 3.30 pm In contrast, the Ministry of Manpower's (MOM's) employment guidelines stipulates that the contractual hours of work for common work arrangement under part four of the Employment Act is 44 hours a week and a typical employee is only allowed to work up to 72 overtime hours a month. For an average month, MOM's guidelines suggest that a typical work month would see one work 176 hours and even if one works overtime, one should not exceed 248 hours. Any more would presumably not be healthy for the employee. This suggests that MOH allows junior doctors to work 72 hours more than what is usually deemed healthy for a typical employee. Why have we institutionalised the practice of overworking our junior doctors? The Employment Act does not mention that managers, executives, solicitors and such are also excluded from this guideline, and doctors, being highly qualified and with special knowledge, belong in this category. To this I say, doctors hold the lives of the vulnerable and ill in their hands.”
“Sir, I have been requesting sheltered pedestrian crossing for my Kaki Bukit ward, a Silver Zone, in previous MOT COS debates. I would like to continue my request this year, as it is a crucial feature to have, especially for my elderly Kaki Bukit residents. 2.30 pm Sir, my ward consists of HDB blocks that were built in the late 70s and early 80s and have a high number of aged residents. There are two neighbourhood centres with each housing a food centre, wet market, shops and supermarket. These two neighbourhood centres, Blocks 537 to 539 and Blocks 509 to 511 precincts of Bedok North Steet 3, are the focal points for my residents for their daily needs, such as grocery shopping and eating their meals. Like any other neighbourhood centres, they also attract many non-residents to come and shop and fulfil their food cravings when many come by their own vehicles or commute by public transport. Sir, in the last few years, we have witnessed erratic weather conditions: super heavy rains and strong wind, especially during the monsoon season. For the past few years also, there has also been an increase in PMA users in my ward due to the ageing population. Hence, Sir, I have been persistent in my request to MOT for sheltered pedestrian crossings in my Kaki Bukit ward, linking the 17 blocks and the nearby bus stop to these two neighbourhood centres. Friendly Street in Private Estates”
“Sir, at the Committee of Supply (COS) 2023, I spoke on behalf of my Kaki Bukit residents, requesting an enhancement of public bus services to improve connectivity to other parts of Bedok Town, particularly the convenience of elderly commuters. The Minister replied that no new routes were being introduced for such intra-town feeder services due to the trade-offs involved. Today, with the same purpose of enhancing the public service for my residents, I would like to request the extension of Bus Service 137 to one of the loops of Bedok South Street 3. Sir, the current Bus Service 137 travels to and from Sims Place, the middle and Upper East Coast Terminal. The bus route covers Bedok North Avenue 1, Bedok North Avenue 2, Bedok North Street 3 of Kaki Bukit ward. Unfortunately, the route from Sims Place to Upper East Coast direction does not cover the loop of Bedok North Street 3, which has the bus stop number 84381 and 84391. Sir, I have received many requests, especially from elderly residents for Bus Service 137 to be extended to the two bus stops mentioned earlier. Based on my estimation, this extension will only have an added time of between three to four minutes and added distance of about 500 to 600 metres. The proposed extension will not only ease the plight of elderly residents who currently have to walk a distance to the nearest bus stop but will also lay the ground for the future residents who will occupy a potential future residential development at the former Bedok Town Secondary School. Bus Connectivity Enhancement”
“Sir, there are three blocks with identical designs in my ward of Kaki Bukit Division of Aljunied Group Representation Constituency (GRC), namely Blocks 528, 532 and 536 of Bedok North Street 3. Each of these blocks are 17 floors high, with a total of 192 units, served by two lift lobbies in each block. Although these three blocks are identical in design, Blocks 528 and 532 are served by a total of three lifts whereas Block 536 is only served by two lifts. Some residents of Block 536 shared with me that there used to be three lifts serving the block until the LUP was carried out. Sir, there are many elderly residents in Kaki Bukit, and Block 536 is no exception. They are particularly reliant on lifts. They have concerns over the wait times for the lifts and are confused why their block is seemingly deprived of one lift compared to the other two blocks of the same design. I therefore seek clarification from HDB on how it determines if a block has a sufficient number of lifts serving it, and secondly, on specifically on Block 536, why two lifts were deemed sufficient for this block, and I do hope that HDB can address this issue and provide the appropriate assistance to the residents of Block 536 of Bedok North Street 3. Support for Private Estates Residents”
“Sir, actually, I have written to SFA and they have actually replied to me recently. I just want to get a better clarification on the issues. What happened was that there is this issue that has been going on for about 10 years where the bakery located in the same block, a four-storey HDB block, has been emanating noise, heat and pungent smell. So, I have written to the relevant agencies, and the last round I wrote was to SFA. And then they did mention that they are working with other relevant agencies to look into the matter. But my question is basically whether SFA has received similar feedback on such issues and how pieces of feedback are being received in a year, and also whether there is any requirement for bakeries that operate in an HDB residential block in managing the noise and heat level resulting from their daily operation. Is there any kind of regulation or requirement imposed by SFA?”
“Sir, earlier in my speech, I have sought two clarifications on my cuts pertaining to ventilation systems for bakeries in order to better manage the disamenities caused by bakeries located in the HDB blocks. I really have not received a reply on this from the Ministry.”
“What are SFA's requirements for bakeries to operate in a HDB residential block emitting the noise and heat levels resulting from their daily operations? My proposal is for SFA to consider bakeries to be regulated with adequate noise control measures as well as sufficient ventilation systems, similar to features like those installed for bakeries located at HDB blocks, so as to be more effective in diffusing heat and vapour. Low Technology Farming Solutions”
“Madam, in the recent Community Disputes Resolution (Amendment) Bill debate, I had cited an example of a long-standing conflict between a group of flat owners and a bakery located in a four-storey HDB block in my Kaki Bukit ward. The residents of three households are affected by the excessive noise and heat from the bakery located on the ground floor. Madam, the issue was first brought to my attention in 2014 when a resident Mr A attended my Meet-the-People Session to seek assistance on the discomfort he faced caused by continuous release of unbearable heat, pungent smell and loud noises emitting from the bakery which he claimed happens daily from 5.00 am to 12.00 midnight. Back then, I made a representation to NEA and HDB Bedok Branch Office. Nine years later, in 2023, Mr A, together with two other residents, Mr B and Mr C, came to see me with similar feedback and I escalated the matter to MND. In October last year, 2024, Mr C returned to see me, citing the situation remains despite the numerous communications with the relevant agencies. He also told me that his two other neighbours have shifted out. This time around, I wrote to SFA to seek assistance. A recent update from SFA dated 27 February 2025 stated that SFA, in collaboration with relevant agencies, had conducted a thorough investigation into the reported disamenities at the mentioned premises. SFA had advised the operator to implement necessary measures to mitigate resultant noise and heat emissions from their food preparation activities. Madam, I would like to seek a couple of clarifications from the Minister related to this issue and would like to put forth a proposal. My clarifications are: how often does SFA receive similar feedback in a year?”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I report that the Committee of Supply has made progress on the Estimates of Expenditure for the financial year 2025/2026, and ask leave to sit again tomorrow.”
“Madam, access to a bank account is essential in daily life in Singapore. In response to a cut filed in 2022 by my colleague, Mr Gerald Giam, then-Deputy Chairman of MAS Mr Lawrence Wong had spoken on the Limited Purpose Bank Accounts, which was then in its pilot phase. These accounts are meant to help ex-offenders to access basic banking services, including receiving their salaries and Government payouts. I seek an update on how many local banks are offering such accounts for ex-offenders and whether MAS has data on the take-up rate for such accounts by ex-offenders. Madam, one of my constituents recently approached me for assistance with opening a bank account. My constituent is an ex-offender and needed a bank account in order to receive her salary. I sent appeals to six different local banks, which were all unsuccessful. I also sent an appeal to MAS. MAS offered to forward my constituent's appeal to DBS, UOB and OCBC but stated they were unable to compel any banks to open an account for my constituent. I urge MAS to work with the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Singapore Prison Service in ensuring ex-offenders can open bank accounts.”
“In January 2025, the results of a Graduate Employment Survey focusing on graduates from the five local polytechnics were released, indicating an employment rate of 54.6%, down from 60% in 2023 and 59% in 2022. The results of a similar survey focused on university graduates showed a fall in employment rates to 79.5% from 84.1% the previous year. These are worrying statistics and if the downward trend persists in subsequent years, will continue to fuel insecurity among Singaporeans beyond fresh entrance into the workforce. I call upon the Government to consider offering incentive schemes to companies that employ more Singaporeans than required by dependency ratio. This incentive could include tax breaks, reduction in Government charges, or preferential access to state incentive. On a related note, as the Government invest in making Singapore more attractive to global companies, it should also consider encouraging such companies to play their part in nurturing and developing our local workforce. Speaking broadly, Madam, my concern is the mental burden borne by the middle class in Singapore. Members of the House would recall the Motion on Mental Health and Well-Being, which was passed in February 2024. The Government has also acknowledged the importance of mental health and well-being and have announced several measures to address the matter. I have today highlighted two issues which adversely affect the middle class in Singapore. I hope that more attention will be paid to their plight, so that we can better understand their worries and take measures to address them.”
“They are left with choices they find neither savoury nor sweet. Madam, I understand that we cannot treat the country's finances as a well of infinite wealth. Trade-offs have to be made and assistance has to be directed to where it is most needed. I also acknowledge that instances such as the ones I have cited may not be representative of the bigger picture. Even so, when such cases do arise, I hope that the relevant agencies will be able to exercise flexibility and review each case more holistically in assessing an applicant's eligibility for assistance. Madam, the next issue I wish to raise has to do with jobs. The ability to cope with the cost of living is not just a function of the price of goods and services, but also the ability to afford them. A report published by The Straits Times on 8 February 2025, covered the experiences of several Singaporeans who had faced employment disruptions. The report noted that residents' unemployment and long-term unemployment rates remain low and the incidence of discouraged workers was also at a low point. Economists interviewed for the article noted that even so, there were plausible reasons for job insecurity among Singaporeans. News of an retention exercises, the increased prevalence of contract work, disruptions caused by technological changes are some of the factors fueling job insecurity. Madam, I note that the Prime Minister has announced greater support for reskilling and retraining opportunities under SkillsFuture and Workfare Skills Support schemes respectively. I am not against the notion that our workforce needs to remain attuned to the needs of the job market and adequately trained. However, I believe we need to take a more proactive approach.”
“My colleagues in the Workers' Party (WP) have floated several proposals in this House on previous occasions – most notably, when we table a Motion calling for the Government to review its policies, so as to lower cost of living pressures on Singaporeans and their families. Madam, today, I wish to draw attention to the plight of the middle class in Singapore; sometimes described as the "sandwich class", as they are earning too much to qualify for the bulk of social assistance and support, but earning too little to have a significant financial cushion to help them deal with various trials and tribulations, which may derail their journey through life. There is also a particular subset of this group, one defined by their age, that leaves them in an unenviable position of bearing responsibilities of caring and supporting aged parents as well as young children. Madam, residents in my division of Kaki Bukit and Aljunied GRC have approached me for assistance. For example, one resident needed legal assistance in a matter involving his brother's insurance claims. He was deemed ineligible for assistance from the Legal Aid Bureau, but the cost of hiring a lawyer was prohibitive for his family and him. Another individual informed me that because his household income did not satisfy the means test threshold, his mother was not qualified for MediFund scheme. He compared himself to his relative, whose elderly mother lives in a rental flat and receive MediFund assistance, even though his relative is more financially secure than he is. He remarked that by having his mother staying with him and caring for her, he feels that he is being penalised for his filial piety. In situations like this, Singaporeans in the middle class are like a sandwich without fillings.”
“Madam, let me begin by acknowledging the considerable thought and effort that must have gone into the formulation of Budget 2025. The world is growing more complex and the impact of global developments are bound to have a significant impact on Singapore, given our dependence on international trade and investment. I am heartened by the proposal, such as the increased assistance levels under schemes such as ComCare and the increased Government support under the Progressive Wage Credit Scheme. At the same time, I once again urge the Singapore Government to review the need for a statutory minimum wage to be introduced to ensure that the lowest earners in Singapore will be able to cope better. Madam, Singaporeans are a pragmatic people. They will always worry about bread and butter issues first. The rising cost of living have been felt more keenly by all Singaporeans in the last few years. The Singapore Government itself is cognisant of this; hence, the announcement of measures, such as CDC Vouchers, U-Save rebates and so on. I note with some interest, however, that Bloomberg reported on 22 February 2025 that a poll conducted among 1,002 Singaporeans by Milieu Insight indicated that 55% of respondents viewed these measures as inadequate in helping them cope with the rising cost of living. I know that a similar poll conducted the year before was even worse, with 62% viewing support measures as inadequate. Taken together, it is clear that Singaporeans want the Government to look beyond the disbursement of payouts to help Singaporeans cope with the cost of living and consider structural changes to existing schemes towards keeping cost of living affordable for all Singaporeans.”
“I thank the Minister, for her reply. But based on my personal dealing with the MPS cases, there are many letters, replies from HDB, which mentioned that residents have to go through the proceedings to be able to prove, to submit a divorce certificate. So, basically, my proposal is for HDB to actually implement a scheme for such cases.”
“Thank you, Sir. I would just like to seek one clarification from the Minister. Earlier, the Minister mentioned that there are cases where HDB approved application for rental flat under the public rental scheme by individuals who are still in the midst of divorce proceedings. So, may I know, is there a specific scheme for this or is it across the board or just based on a case-by-case basis?”
“Sir, on the contrary, the implication of not approving LTVP+ applications for both these groups is that their lives will become more challenging and it will further complicate their lives. I would like to request that ICA exercise greater flexibility to applicants who are facing the two situations that I mentioned. Sir, in conclusion, I hope that the points I have raised in this speech will be given due attention and implemented by the relevant Government agencies.”
“How would ICA be able to assess factors like economic contributions, length of residency, the applicant’s ability to contribute to Singapore and integrate in our society, as well as the applicant’s commitment to sink roots, as stated in ICA’s website, when the applicants themselves have little chance to try and fulfil those factors because they are in Singapore for a limited time as short-term visit pass holders? Sir, similar to my earlier suggestion regarding HDB rental flat applications by wives or husbands undergoing divorce, ICA can also work with Family Service Centres to conduct a more in-depth analysis and establish a scoring system to measure and assess the applicant’s difficulty. By having a more thorough evaluation process, this will help ICA make more accurate and better assessment. It is my understanding that ICA's current process only accepts appeals via email and e-forms, without any face-to-face sessions. I believe that this approach may be insufficient to obtain a comprehensive assessment of the problems or challenges that are faced by those submitting appeals for rejected applications. Sir, it is my view that approving LTVP+ for Singaporean couples in financially vulnerable positions would enable their foreign spouses to seek employment. This will potentially increase household income and therefore alleviate any financial burden. For elderly applicants requiring care, in addition to their partners having the opportunity to work and increase their income, the presence of their partners by their side for an extended period is very much needed, to provide companionship in their twilight years, and for those who have health issues, their partners can be there and provide the best care.”
“Sir, the next group concerns Singaporeans who have repeatedly been unsuccessful in their efforts to obtain a Long-Term Visit Pass Plus (LTVP+) for their life partners, as well as their family members, be it biological children or stepchildren who are foreign nationals. This group often laments that they cannot live together as a family because they are often separated due to their inability to obtain LTVPs for their partners and other family members. There are also reports of couples who are burdened with this challenge and had to divorce due to the intense pressure of having to always live separately because they were unable to obtain LTVPs. Sir, based on my observations from appeal cases handled during MPS, it appears that LTVP+ applications that are frequently rejected, seem to be from applicants whose Singaporean partners are in financially vulnerable positions or are of advanced age. Sir, the ICA website states: "ICA takes into account factors such as the individual's family ties to Singaporeans, economic contributions, qualifications, age, family profile and length of residency, to assess the applicant's ability to contribute to Singapore and integrate into our society, as well as his or her commitment to sinking roots." Sir, I acknowledge the importance and necessity of these factors. However, at the same time, I do wonder how an applicant would be able to fulfil the factors set out by ICA? This situation is akin to the question "which comes first, the chicken or egg?".”
“Due to this concern, these individuals who are about to become single parents will apply to get rental flats under the Public Rental Scheme. Usually, for such cases, HDB will tell the applicants to wait until their divorce case is settled in order for it to be evaluated and processed. Sir, Members of this House would have often been approached by individuals in such situations during their MPS. I acknowledge that HDB will do its best when considering applications and appeals from these soon-to-be single parents. However, I feel that the existing system or process can still be improved and refined. What I would like to suggest for such situations is for HDB to join hands and work closely with social agencies such as Family Service Centres to conduct a more in-depth analysis and establish a scoring system to measure and assess applicants' difficulties, and whether they are in dire need of shelter. If the results of the analysis show that an applicant’s situation is serious, does not have close family support and also does not have a place to live in and so on, HDB can give "in-principle approval" even though the divorce has not been officially finalised. This will at least provide some form of assurance to the applicants and also can alleviate the pressure that they face. At the same time, this proposed process can reduce the waiting time to get rental flats for these applicants. More importantly, a more in-depth and thorough evaluation process like this can address situations where cases are overlooked or had "fallen through the cracks".”
“Sir, my speech would be in Malay. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Sir, the phrase "Family is the pillar of society" aptly suits the Motion tabled before us. This phrase means that families, as the smallest units in a society, play an important role and have an impact in shaping values and strengthening any society. Therefore, Sir, when there are efforts that help improve family life, such efforts are very much welcome and must be given full support. My colleagues and I from the Workers' Party have given various suggestions as well as underlined the importance of having more family-friendly government schemes and policies, coupled with less pressure and more happiness, in order to further improve family life in Singapore, which will thereby further strengthen Singaporean families, thus forming a more prosperous, strong and cohesive society. Sir, among the matters I have raised in this House include Paternity Leave and Family Care leave. I have done so during my first term. In addition, I have, on many occasions, raised in this House the concerns and grievances of segments of Singaporeans who are still burdened with challenges and hardships of family life that made them feel marginalised and neglected. In today's debate, I would like to once again focus on two groups of Singaporean families facing challenges, in the hope that their concerns and feedback will receive due attention. Sir, firstly, I wish to once again, raise the issue of wives or husbands who are undergoing divorce and are very worried about finding a place to live for themselves and their children, because their matrimonial home needs to be sold under Court order.”
“Thank you to the Minister for his clarification. On his seeking of clarification regarding the gender equality, if I can put it that way, basically, as what I have quoted yesterday, even the former Member of Parliament, Mr Zainal Sapari, and I think most Muslims know, the Friday prayers are only obligatory upon the male Muslims, not for females. That is why I am asking on behalf of male Muslims. And my clarification yesterday was pertaining to the two scenarios to get an affirmation and certainty from the Minister that the two scenarios have been happening for so many years, and are even reflected in the Suara Musyawarah, which is the Singapore Conversations equivalent, and even the issue about Friday prayers being highlighted on social media by Assistant Secretary-General, Mr Zainal Sapari. So, I just want to have a confirmation and certainty that the two scenarios that I cited yesterday can come under the legislation. That is all.”
“Sir, I am not discounting about using dialogue to manage such issues. But what I am trying to say is, whether under the current Bill, which is going to be enacted soon, most probably, I just wanted to know whether he actually agrees that it should be covered under this legislation, this Bill, for the two instances that I mentioned?”
“Thank you, Sir. I would like to pose one clarification to Member Mr Fahmi Aliman. I would just like to clarify whether, the two instances that I cited yesterday that are not covered by the law or the WFL. One of them is about allowing Muslim males to go for Friday prayers and the other one is the wearing of tudung for female Muslims. Am I right to say that the Member disagrees that these two instances are supposed to be covered under WFL?”
“This Suara Musyawarah report was produced by an independent and non-partisan committee formed by the government with the objective of gathering feedback as well as concerns and aspirations of the Malay/Muslim community in Singapore. On page 21, paragraph 32 of the Suara Musyawarah report in Malay, and I quote, "This committee has also heard several personal experiences that give the impression that discrimination is also practiced in employment. Personal examples include employers who clearly state that their preference is for non-Malay workers and Muslim women are sidelined or bluntly told that they are not allowed to wear the hijab". Sir, this Suara Musyawarah report was published in 2013, almost 12 years ago, and the feedback that was collated are possibly incidents that had occurred several years before 2013. In fact, my wife had a similar experience back in 2000 when she was almost accepted to work at a private language centre but with one condition, which was she cannot wear a hijab. Moving forward, a recent incident that received attention from many people, including Madam Halimah Yacob, who was the President at that time, was a case that occurred in 2020. It involved a Muslim female worker at a well-known department store who was told to remove her hijab a few minutes after she had just started work on her first day. In this case, as reported in the media, Madam Halimah firmly stated, "there is no place for discrimination of any form and against anyone in Singapore". Sir, in conclusion, I would like to seek confirmation from the Ministry of Manpower that both scenarios I have shared, namely not giving permission to perform Friday prayers for Muslim men and the wearing of hijab for Muslim women, are recognised as workplace discrimination under this Bill.”
“The second situation involves Muslim male employees whose request for a slightly longer break on Fridays to perform Friday prayers are refused by their employers. In general, many Government agencies and employers in the private sector allow Muslim men to perform Friday prayers. However, there are still some or a few who do not permit it. The issue of granting permission to perform Friday prayers was previously raised by former Member of Parliament Mr Zainal Sapari through his social media platform. Mr Zainal Sapari's sharing on this matter was covered by online media outlet Mothership on 17 July 2019, titled "MP Zainal Bin Sapari suggests S'pore employers give Muslim men time-off for Friday Mosque prayers". Mr Zainal Sapari, who is currently the Assistant Secretary-General of the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC), said he had been approached by Muslim male employees who face difficulties in getting permission from their companies or employers to perform Friday prayers. He said that "it would be much appreciated if employers could grant male Muslim workers time-off between 12.30pm to 2.30pm to go to the mosques". In the same Facebook post, Mr Zainal Sapari also explained the obligation of Friday prayers for Muslim men, and he also opined that "workers should also 'make up for lost company time' by coming to work a little earlier, or leaving later that day". The second scenario is a situation that has received much attention for a while now, which is the wearing of hijab. For years, there have been occasional accounts or reports about Muslim women facing situations where they are asked to remove their hijab if they want to be accepted for employment or after they have started work. This matter was mentioned in the Suara Musyawarah report published in 2013.”
“Sir, I will be speaking in Malay. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Sir, the Workplace Fairness Bill that has been presented and is currently being debated has been eagerly anticipated by Singaporeans, especially those who are more vulnerable to discrimination when seeking employment as well as those carrying out their duties. The Workers' Party has long voiced the need for legislation to address the issue of workplace discrimination. We, the Workers' Party MPs, along with Singaporeans, feel relieved that after waiting for so long, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) has finally made this decision. Sir, in part Three of the bill titled Protected Characteristics, clause 8 lists and establishes the protected characteristics, namely age, nationality, sex, marital status, pregnancy, caregiving responsibilities, race, religion and language ability, as well as disability and mental health condition. This protection covers all stages of employment, including recruitment, period of employment and dismissal. Sir, I would like to take this opportunity to raise or bring up again the concerns of Muslim community in Singapore regarding the types of workplace discrimination experienced by certain Muslim individuals. I will share two scenarios that have been experienced by Singaporean Muslim individuals and would like to seek clarification and confirmation that, based on this bill, discriminatory practices indeed occur in these two scenarios and that the affected individuals can file a report. The first scenario concerns the observance of Friday prayers for Muslim men. One situation involves Muslim men being rejected for employment during interviews because their request to perform Friday prayers is not granted by the company.”
“Sir, in this case, although complaints have been channelled to the relevant Government agencies and I believe these agencies have taken all possible measures to find the best solution, from what I understand, based on the sharing by the flat owner who came to see me, the complaints about have not been satisfactorily resolved. This has led to several flat owners moving to other areas to protect their health and their families' health. I believe the new cases that I shared are also happening in other HDB housing estates. Here, I would like to suggest that future amendments to the CDR Act is further expanded to include commercial units located in HDB blocks, not just residential units alone. Sir, before concluding this speech, I would like to suggest introducing an order for mandatory counselling sessions. The resolution of disputes between neighbours through the tribunal process may not be a permanent solution if the root cause or main issue is not addressed. Disputed issues often stem from a lack of awareness and understanding about the need for tolerance, mutual respect, consideration and effective communication in discussing contentious issues. By attending counselling sessions, it is hoped that the spirit of unity and neighbourliness can be fostered and strengthened among the parties facing disputes.”
“Furthermore, in comparing the CDRT legal process and civil claims, the civil claims process is more complicated and challenging. Another situation that I consider to be a neighbourhood issue is disputes involving business owners operating in commercial units located below HDB flats, which are typically found in four-storey blocks of flats. Sir, in section 4(4a) and (4b) of the existing Act, "A neighbour of a respondent is an individual who lawfully resides in a place of residence: (a) that is in the same building as the respondent's place of residence; or (b) that is within 100 metres of the respondent's place of residence." Based on this explanation, this Act does not include situations where there is a dispute between a flat owner who is neighbours with the owner or tenant of a commercial unit in the same block within 100 metres of the place where the respondent's residence is located. I would like to share a situation in my constituency where some flat owners are neighbours with a commercial unit that runs a business manufacturing and selling pastries and cakes. I have been approached by several flat owners who complained that their quality of life is adversely affected by heat, odours and early morning noise coming from a commercial unit located on the ground floor of the same block. My complaints have been passed on to HDB and NEA several times over the years. Most recently, a few months ago, I was approached by an affected homeowner who made a complaint and asked for help to have something done. The person told me that some of the neighbours who previously complained had moved to other areas because they could no longer endure the physical and mental suffering caused by the heat, odours and noise produced by the commercial unit.”
“Sir, next I would like to seek clarification on two situations that occur frequently among neighbours in HDB housing estates and whether Bill will cover both situations that I will mention. Firstly, I believe the members of this House and HDB are often approached and contacted about the payment of compensation for cases of leaks that cause damage to kitchen cabinets, appliances and equipment and treatment costs for cases where the flat occupant get injured due to slippery floors caused by ceiling and pipe leaks originating from clogged pipes in the neighbour's home upstairs. Some of the cases that I highlighted are situations where HDB conducted visits and advised the neighbour not to use the kitchen tap in the kitchen sink, but this advice is not heeded by the homeowner, which caused the leak to worsen and cause more damage to the property of the neighbour below. I understand that HDB will advise affected flat residents to contact their neighbours and seek compensation for damages incurred or medical costs. Sir, it should be acknowledged that it is not easy for affected flat owners to obtain compensation as this will only happen if their neighbours are willing to do so. From what I understand, in situations where the neighbour does not agree, the party seeking compensation need to file a civil claim. As we know, such matters cannot be brought to the Small Claims Tribunal. Sir, I would like to seek clarification whether, in such cases, can the affected flat owners use the CMC channel and, if the situation warrants it, file their case at CDRT? I am of the view that such issues involving neighbours are better handled by CDRT on the basis that they involve aspects and elements of neighbourliness and community relations.”
“Mr Speaker, in Malay. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Sir, the Ministry's efforts to enhance and tighten the Community Disputes Resolution Act (CDRA) are welcomed by many groups and the general public. The Workers' Party and I support this amendment Bill. I would like to seek explanations and obtain clarifications on some matters related to this amendment Bill. Firstly, one of the new efforts to be implemented is the use of sensors or monitoring devices to capture sounds and the like, which may be used as evidence in tribunal sessions. This is stated in the new section 13H. Sir, this is a very good and useful initiative especially for flat owners or homeowners who are elderly and are not savvy in using recording devices or technology especially the latest and cutting-edge devices. However, I would like to ask whether the homeowner will be charged any fee for the use of these devices. I am asking this because there are certain groups who may feel reluctant if fees are imposed for certain reasons. If fees are to be charged, I request that exemptions be considered for those in need. Sir, the new section 13C is about the establishment of the CRU as well as the granting of powers to the appointed Community Relations Officer. The establishment of the CRU with specific powers is, indeed, necessary. Earlier, Minister Edwin Tong and Senior Minister of State Sim Ann explained about the functions and operations of the CRU. I would like to get a bit more clarification on how CRU operates. I hope there will be clarification on whether this CRU operates similarly to the police, where the public can contact this unit at any time, late at night or early morning, to get assistance in stopping disturbances from neighbours at that very moment.”
“Rather, I believe that it is also in the public interest that senior appointments in NSAs are also carried out in a way that ensures that the best available person for the job is hired, especially since public monies are involved. On a related note, I would like to know how much has been spent on the Unleash the Roar project to date and what are the key milestones which have been reached. Unleash the Roar”
“Sir, I have spoken extensively in this House on the topic of Singapore football. This was the focus of my speech during a Motion on sporting excellence which I filed in July 2023 alongside my colleague Assoc Prof Jamus Lim. From July 2023 until now, our national football team has won matches against Guam twice as well as Taiwan once and were defeated by Tajikistan, South Korea and Thailand respectively. We have also appointed a new coach, Tsutomu Ogura, who will replace his countryman who was sacked after a string of disappointing results. I would like to know if MCCY is privy to what targets FAS has set for Mr Ogura in the short, intermediate and long term. Sir, the Football Association of Singapore is one of the many national sports associations (NSAs) that receive funding from the Government via Sport Singapore. In 2017, my colleague Mr Pritam Singh had asked a Parliamentary Question about how the Government exercised oversight over how monies are used by the NSAs. I would like to seek an update from MCCY on the current policies on what are the safeguards in place to prevent any misallocation or misuse of public funds from happening in our NSAs. I would also like to know what is the framework for determining how much funding each NSA gets and what benchmarks are put in place to determine whether an NSA is performing its function in a satisfactory manner. How much weight is placed on success and victories in tournaments and competitions? To be clear, Sir, I am not saying that sporting success is the only or most important measure in determining if an NSA is performing well.”
“A complete and detailed progress report will enable, firstly, the community to have a deeper knowledge and understanding about the development and effectiveness of the programmes and initiatives that have been carried out, and secondly, so that the community can also know about the progress of M3's efforts in achieving the mission and vision that has been outlined for the Singapore Muslim community.”
“Sir, in Malay. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Sir, I would like to ask a few questions to get some clarification and also give suggestions on these two matters, firstly, the Mosque Building and MENDAKI Fund (MBMF), and secondly, M3. Sir, the Mosque Building Fund (MBF) was initially set up to finance the cost of building new mosques during the period when Singapore was undergoing development and urbanisation. The MBF then became the MBMF in 1984, after the establishment of MENDAKI Foundation, and the use of this fund was further expanded to include efforts and initiatives for community development. In 2009, this fund was also extended for the use of upgrading and revitalising mosques. Sir, the information I share is available on MUIS' website. I would like to ask Minister about the use of the MBMF to fund the development of mosques. What is the allocation of funds from MBMF, in terms of percentage, against the actual cost, firstly, for the construction of new mosques like the Yusof Ishak Mosque; secondly for rebuilding mosques, like the Al-Ansar mosque; and thirdly, for mosques that undergo upgrading and repair works, like the one that Alkaff Kampung Melayu mosque is undergoing. Sir, regarding the M3 network that was established in 2018, I would like to know whether the Minister will produce its Progress Report. If this report will be produced, when will it be done? May I suggest that this progress report be released once every five years.”
“Thank you, Sir. I have one clarification for Minister Masagos. I believe Minister Masagos mentioned earlier that the ComLink+ family coaches are actually social workers from the FSCs and I believe the Minister is aware of the already heavy workload of FSCs' social workers. So, I would like to ask whether MSF will actually be able to provide additional resources and funding to FSCs, so that FSCs are sufficiently equipped?”
“Additionally, Sir, I would recommend that MSF and MOE explore integrating basic financial literacy into the curriculum for secondary school students. I have made numerous calls for the adoption of the social protection framework developed by the International Labour Organization (ILO) and the introduction of an annual social protection report, which tracks the effectiveness and efficacy of our social policies meant to uplift society. I would like to propose piloting the ILO's social protection framework and social protection report for the ComLink+ scheme. ComLink+”
“Sir, at the Budget Statement a fortnight ago, the roll-out of a number of enhancements to ComLink, dubbed ComLink+, was announced. I welcome moves to provide additional assistance and support and empower low-income households. This can go a long way. One feature of ComLink+ is having family coaches and voluntary befrienders working directly with beneficiaries' families, providing custom support. This is indeed a fundamental aspect in facilitating and empowering families towards achieving their goals. For households who are facing life challenges: mentorship, facilitation and, at times, handholding, are crucial. Financial and other tangible forms of assistance will not be effective without this human aspect. In 2022, I have highlighted the importance of a good interpersonal relationship between the beneficiaries and the case worker in order to optimise the effectiveness of the assistance and support rendered. I would like to reiterate this crucial point. I recommend that MSF maintain a low beneficiaries-to-coach and befrienders ratio. This will not only ensure that beneficiaries' families get adequate support from their coach and befrienders, it can also help reduce burnout and stress on the coaches and befrienders. I also welcome the introduction of assistance with debt repayment to licensed moneylending companies and organisations that are trackable and verifiable. Nonetheless, there are and will be cases where low-income households turn to unlicensed moneylenders. I would like to ask MSF if any assistance will be offered to low-income households in such a predicament. I suggest that MSF could also explore working together with organisations focused on debt counselling, such as Adullam Life Counselling.”
“Madam, in MOT's COS 2022 debate, I had asked LTA to consider building sheltered linkways at pedestrian crossings, as part of a Silver Zone feature, towards further improving the safety of elderly Singaporeans when moving around the estate. I would like to seek updates on this suggestion. I would also like to request that if LTA is to implement this suggestion, please do consider my ward, Kaki Bukit, for its pilot as it is one of the first few estates to have a Silver Zone. Sadly, Kaki Bukit does not even have a single sheltered linkway erected by LTA at pedestrian crossings, although I have previously sent written requests to LTA for such improvements. Madam, in addition, I would like to suggest that LTA consider widening the pedestrian path at pedestrian crossing islands. With the increase in the use of PMAs by the elderly and physically disabled, widening such areas would enhance the safety and comfort for all users. Finally, I would like to ask that LTA share the most common feedback LTA has received, regarding improvements to the Silver Zone features, as well as what LTA has implemented, in response to such feedback.”
“Sir, I will touch on four matters related to HDB's public rental scheme, PRS. First, on the Joint Single Scheme (JSS) Operator-Run, which was launched in December 2021. I would like to ask, how many applications HDB received in 2022 and 2023 and what is the success rate? Second, I have encountered more residents seeking help to appeal for a PRS JSS unit but have faced difficulties finding a suitable co-applicant even after receiving a list of potential co-applicants from HDB. Other than the JSS-OR scheme, what other measures are HDB exploring to assist this segment? Third, how many 3-room PRS units have been created to date? What is the occupancy rate and what are the eligibility criteria for a family wishing to apply for a 3-room PRS unit? Sir, my final points relate to the challenges faced by single parents who are either unemployed or low-income earners. I have met many of whom, are anxious about housing for themselves and their children following a divorce. While waiting for their matrimonial flat to be disposed of, they are unable to apply for a PRS unit. But if they apply only after the matrimonial unit is sold, they may be in for a long wait before the application for a PRS is approved and a unit is allocated to them. During the wait, they have no stable housing. In many cases, the financial proceeds from the sales of matrimonial units are insufficient for them to secure a new flat and they also cannot afford renting from the open market. Sir, would HDB consider granting single parents in such situation in-principle approvals, provided they meet the other criteria for a PRS unit? Home Ownership”
“Sir, I would like to seek a point of clarification from Minister Chan. I heard Minister acknowledging that the issue of the Israel-Palestine conflict is a sensitive one a few times in his speech. I just want to know whether MOE considered in the first place, to consult parents of younger students whether they are comfortable to have their children partake in this particular CCE lesson, which touches on sensitive issues, like what Minister said? I believe this is done similarly for the Ministry's sexuality education. So, just one clarification.”
“While the Government considers the Workers' Party proposal towards equalising the fees between SPED schools and the mainstream ones; can it, in the interim, adopt a similarly tiered approach to ensure more equitable outcomes and provide much-needed relief for middle-income families with a special needs child? Mainstream School – Disability Awareness”