Nadia Ahmad Samdin
Singapore
“Other exchanges have pursued dual, listings and cross-market linkages. The experience has been mixed. While these frameworks generally reduce friction and improve access, they have not always translated into influence. Some companies eventually opt out of dual listing as a hitch.”
“Thank you, Speaker, and I thank the Minister as well. I have just two points, mainly related to the site-specific studies, as it appears that this is a very key part of the process, and I am not sure if I missed it.”
“Second, singles up till now can typically only purchase 2-room, Flexi or resale flats, given that two-room flexi flats are highly sought after by both singles and seniors, can the Ministry consider expanding the options?”
“Thank you, Chairman. I have three follow-up questions. The first is regarding food resilience and the initial plans for the Lim Chu Kang Agri-District. Could the Minister of State please elaborate on that. The second, I am very glad to hear of the top-up to the ACT Fund.”
“Could the Ministry share how aquacultural farms are transitioning towards climate resilience systems, such as hybrid or re-circulating agricultural technologies as well as the take-up rates of support schemes, the extent of transition across the sector and any key challenges in scaling the adoption of such technologies.”
“The recently published Green Skills Report defines what are green jobs and green skills, finding that such competencies are being integrated into mainstream roles, not just specialist jobs, with about 5,000 workers projected to be needed by 2030.”
The complete record
Every one of 406 lines we hold for Nadia Ahmad Samdin, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 1 of 9.
“Other exchanges have pursued dual, listings and cross-market linkages. The experience has been mixed. While these frameworks generally reduce friction and improve access, they have not always translated into influence. Some companies eventually opt out of dual listing as a hitch. But it is timely that we are pursuing the GLB now while strengthening the vibrancy and depth of our markets. This will further Singapore's place in our currently fractured world as a trusted stable bridge. If the GLB is to succeed, we must ensure that Singapore remains relevant to the companies that will define the future, that our firms are equipped to compete on a global stage, that investors are educated and equipped to understand the implications of the GLB and that our economy benefits meaningfully. Notwithstanding my clarifications, I support the Bill.”
“For professional services, given familiarity with US laws and systems, would be necessary, how can we support local professionals to secure a share of the work generated? And do we have any plans on an inter-agency effort that focuses on translating listing presence into broader corporate activity within Singapore? Finally, a brief point on cross-border regulatory enforcement. While the draft Bill and rules provide for regulatory cooperation and timely disclosure across both markets, there remains practical, operational questions of how this will work in moments of stress. How will cross-border investigation and enforcement operate in practice when the same event affects investors in both jurisdictions, depending on whether it is first detected in the US or in Singapore? Will there be any new bodies formed or other laws harmonised to oversee investigations and information transfer decide on trading halts as well as coordinate reviews? Does Singapore plan to conduct independent investigations? While the framework recognises time zone differences by requiring ongoing disclosures made on the SEC EDGAR system by the issuer to be announced via SGXNet, at the same time; and other material disclosures made by the issuer will be required to be released in Singapore via SGXNet within one trading day after the date they are filed in the US, timeliness for market's sensitive information is crucial. I look forward to future operational guidelines on how this will be coordinated and decided. If we are building a bridge between two markets, then market integrity must be able to travel across that bridge in real time that suits both investor bases, not only after the fact. Mr Deputy Speaker, we are not the first market to explore such an approach.”
“It ensures that Singapore-based investors are not merely trading these securities but are participating in the formation of capital itself. It creates allocation to local institutions and engagement with regional investor base. The listing activities itself generates ecosystem value – from due diligence to legal structuring, underwriting and advisory, accounting and compliance, research and coverage. These create new professional opportunities, build expertise and deepen Singapore's capabilities in handling cross-border listings. A listing presence combined with investor engagement can, hopefully, encourage the development of regional headquarter functions and closer integration with Singapore's financial and business ecosystem. While not guaranteed, these are pathways through which listing activities can translate into longer-term economic contribution. But we must be realistic about the limits. If trading volumes concentrate in the US, then market-making activity, derivatives trading and a significant portion of financial intermediation will also concentrate there. If analysts' coverage, investor engagement and prospectus requirements are primarily US-led, then much of the influence over valuation and requirements for US capabilities and professional services will sit outside of Singapore. I would like to ask beyond the initial capital raised, what mechanisms ensure that economic activity continues to accrue to Singapore over the life of these listings? Do we have any plans to deepen local participation, both from investors and institutions attracting capital from other parts of Asia so that Singapore's role can grow?”
“If the GLB is to succeed, readiness cannot be treated as a compliance checklist, but instead be complemented with a capability building agenda. The expectations of US markets may not always be aligned with the realities of companies emerging from Asia, many of which operate in different languages and times zones. While operating in this environment will force companies to demonstrate a different level of robustness that is recognised more globally, whether by investors, partners or talent, I would like to ask how we are preparing our Singaporean companies for this transition beyond simply exposing them to the opportunity. And is there a supporting role that Singapore can play for Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) companies which intend to pursue a GLB listing? While the Government should not be actively interfering or shaping a company's entry into capital markets, where possible, will we consider partnering with industry to develop structures to bridge capability gaps? This leads to my third point: translating listings into tangible economic value for Singapore. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the success of GLB should not be measured by the number of quality listings alone. It should be measured by the extent to which those listings translate into tangible economic value for Singapore and Singaporeans. When a company lists, value is created across multiple areas, including capital formation, professional and support services, investor participation and longer-term ecosystem development. I am heartened to see that there are mechanisms within the GLB that seek to anchor value locally. For example, as I earlier mentioned, the requirement that companies raise a meaningful portion of their capital through Singapore. This is not trivial.”
“The GLB extends that logic into capital markets. But we must be clear-eyed about the risks and limitations. Under the current structure, the listing on Nasdaq is an anchor. The listing on SGX is not designed to stand independently. I have four questions. If price discovery generally happens in the US due to deeper liquidity, what role can Singapore play beyond access? If trading volumes concentrate in the US, how can we ensure our market also remains active rather than symbolic, given lower trading liquidity? Has the Government assess whether the Singapore institutional and retail investor base can consistently generate sufficient demand for GLB issuers to meet the minimum threshold? Otherwise, the requirement may become a hurdle that limits uptake and the default may be re-allocation. Give the the volatility in the world, is the MAS considering other prescribed dual-listing arrangements as it stands with other markets that could further open up new sources of capital and cooperation? Second, preparing companies for the realities of the US market. The draft listing rules set out a minimum $2 billion in market capitalisation at listing threshold, among other criteria. This means that the pool of companies which qualify for the GLB may not be large. But it goes beyond market capitalisation. The question is also whether these companies are ready to go live as a public company in a US-led market environment. That means having the governance disclosure controls, investor relations capability and financial reporting discipline to withstand a cadence of scrutiny from sophisticated analysts, investor base regulators and the media. Companies must also get used to new success metrics beyond revenue, especially tech firms.”
“I would like to focus on four areas: first, how we position Singapore, particularly, as a bridge for high-growth companies in Asia; second, how we prepare our companies for the realities of operating within these markets, where expectations, scrutiny and standards are different; third, how we ensure that this integration translates into tangible progress and economic value for Singapore through capital participation and ecosystem development; and finally, how we ensure market integrity through seamless mutual enforcement and timely information sharing. First, Singapore as an Asian bridge. As Southeast Asia continues to produce high-growth firms, particularly in tech, many seek listing opportunities in the US. The GLB ensures that even as these companies pursue global capital, they can do so without losing access to regional investors, proximity to core markets and the strategic appeal that comes from being anchored in both Western and Asian ecosystems. It is also hoped that it will boost SGX's IPO pipeline and competitiveness. The framework requires that companies raise a portion of their capital through Singapore – $75 million or 15% of the global offering, whichever is higher. This ensures that our market is not merely a point of access but a point of participation where Singapore has a stake in the growth of these companies. Rather than accessing such opportunities only through foreign markets, our capital can engage through our own infrastructure. By enabling companies to access US capital markets while maintaining a listing presence on SGX as well, we position Singapore not as an alternative but reinforce our role as a gateway economy. We have long positioned ourselves as a hub for flows of capital, talent and ideas.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I rise in support of the Securities and Futures (Amendment) Bill. Historically, exchanges competed as destinations. Companies chose where to list and in doing so, they chose where value will be created, where liquidity would sit and where their story will be told. But that mode has shifted. Today, broad capital is global, deep liquidity is concentrated and the companies shaping the future, particularly in technology and innovation, are not bound by geography. They go where capital is deepest, coverage is strongest and where they are understood. This creates a structural challenge for Singapore, not because we lack strong institutions or capability or credibility, but because the gravitational pull of global capital, particularly for high-growth and technology companies, is traditionally not centred here due to investor culture, risks, platform dominance, regulatory infrastructure and talent, among other factors. The GLB offers a response to this reality. It is not an attempt to out-compete the largest capital markets in the world. It is a recognition that we must evolve our role within them. In a more uncertain and fragmented global environment, it is imperative that Singapore continues to strengthen our position as a trusted and relevant financial hub. Listings typically involve overlapping and sometimes disjointed disclosure standards, liability frameworks and regulatory timelines. These can add significant coordination, complexity and cost. So, I appreciate the intent of these amendments to better align processes and reduce duplication. These are practical steps that can reduce friction.”
“Thank you, Speaker. On assurances to households, I would like to appeal for my second question earlier on national food stockpile to please be answered.”
“Thank you, Speaker. On food price monitoring, given that we import more than 90% of our food supply, could the Government share more – whether there are ways for data on the monitoring dashboard that is used by the Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment to be shared more proactively so that households and businesses have more timely visibility of emerging price trends for scenario planning and whether more forward-looking indicators can be included to help Singaporeans better cope with potential price fluctuations. As a second point, I thank Minister Tan for some of his sharing in response to questions earlier on contingency scenario planning as well as the stockpile for LNG and diesel. I understand the need to not disclose sensitive details around our national food stockpile. However, could the Government consider whether there is merit to provide some general indicators of adequacy for certain food items and essentials, such as broad coverage, ranges or scenario readiness, so as to give Singaporeans greater assurance in light of the current uncertainties, similar to the two to three months' data which was shared during COVID-19. Where I am coming from is while many appreciate these broader updates, there is room to build understanding and make the impact clearer at an individual and household level so that our people have a better understanding how prepared we are but not immune and also a sense of agency that they can still do something amidst this uncertainty.”
“Thank you, Speaker, and I thank the Minister as well. I have just two points, mainly related to the site-specific studies, as it appears that this is a very key part of the process, and I am not sure if I missed it. First, in the event there are differing timelines or approaches adopted by neighbouring landowners, given that each measure will really depend on the site, what is the formal mechanism that PUB has to step in and ensure that there is alignment across implementation? That was the first question. The second is, how will interested groups and members of the public be made aware about the timing of these site-specific studies and is there any opportunities for citizen scientists to get involved? Because I appreciate the Minister's assurances that nature will be well considered and integrated, but for nature-based solutions, these have to be very intentionally designed and woven in as part of the process.”
“Could the Ministry clarify how continuity of planning and coordination with new owners will be ensured if and when coastal land changes ownership after the protection requirements or boundaries have been designated? Has the Ministry considered how many such parcels have changed hands over the past 10 or 20 years? Given these coordination and implementation complexities, support for landowners will be important. I therefore appreciate the technical expertise, planning coordination and financial assistance the Government will provide. As investment costs may be significant, it would be helpful if the Ministry could outline a little bit more, the financial and technical support available over the years, so as to provide greater assurance to landowners during implementation and more importantly for maintenance in the years to come as such measures will need to remain robust and effective? Sir, coastal protection is a collective responsibility across Government, landowners and the wider community. We inherited a coastline shaped with foresight, and it is our responsibility now to safeguard the shores that support livelihoods, leisure and our connection to the sea. In doing so, we ensure that future generations will continue to know Singapore not only as a global city, but also as an island home that will endure and thrive in the face of climate change. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Waves roll by the shore, Sea breeze greets the morning light, Coastlines guarded more and more, For future generations' sight. (In English): Thank you, Sir. I support the Bill.”
“Given that climate projections and requirements may evolve over time, could the Ministry also share how the Coastal Protection Code of Practice will be periodically updated, and how landowners will be supported if future standards require upgrades to earlier works? I would also like to ask if the Ministry will consider including in its Code of Practice an encouragement and prioritisation for hybrid nature-based solutions that meet the technical requirements? In some parts of the world, coastal protection has successfully taken on an integrated approach that can attenuate wave energy, enhance biodiversity and in some cases even create usable public spaces alongside protection works. For example, sponge cities in Denmark and China or living shorelines in America. Sir, water does not respect boundaries. Beyond individual sites, coastal protection also operates as a connected system which the Minister has emphasised. The Bill rightly requires continuity along the adjacent land parcels. Could the Ministry please elaborate how PUB will support the coordination, so that the overall coastal system functions cohesively? In the event there are differing timelines or approaches adopted by the neighbouring landowners, what mechanisms will PUB have to step in and ensure timely alignment so that gaps do not emerge so as to avoid implementation risks? This need for continuity also extends over time beyond the parcels, as land ownership may change. The Bill allows for up to 10 years for owners to implement measures, which is helpful for long-term planning and coordination. However, there may be instances where land ownership changes during this period.”
“Sir, I rise in support of the Coastal Protection Bill. As an island city-state, our proximity and access to the sea is an important part of our identity. Along our shores are where many Singaporeans first learn to cycle, sail, fish, barbecue with family, dive or simply watch the sunset. For me, the coast is also where my husband and I enjoy slowing down with my son when time permits – pointing out boats along our shores. Our coasts also support a wide range of activities and livelihoods: from sustaining trade to aquaculture and the protection of coastal habitats, such as mangroves and coral reefs. As climate change intensifies and Singapore strengthens coastal protection, these measures will inevitably shape our coastal environments and the people connected to them. This Bill is an important step in ensuring that our shores remain safe, healthy and accessible for generations to come. Coastal protection, however, is technically complex and I am heartened that the Ministry and PUB have developed a nuanced plan that recognises the differing needs of stakeholders. Sir, the Government will implement most of the coastal protection measures and the remaining coastline is occupied by private landowners and lessees. Naturally, their interests may be more site-specific than system-wide and there may arise situations where a landowner implements a more modest measure, whereas integrated coastal defence requires more comprehensive works. Could the Ministry share how PUB will guide and support landowners to take a holistic and long-term approach to coastal protection, rather than prioritising lowest-cost or short-term retrofits?”
“But can we consider support programmes for multi-generational families living under one roof and our seniors? Using MENDAKI Funds”
“(In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Chairman, I want to address challenges facing many young families. Many belong to the "sandwich generation" and face pressure from rising cost of living, while balancing responsibilities of raising children and caring for aging parents. Sometimes, they bear all this without strong family support networks, unlike previous generations. As a mother, I have went through the early stages of marriage and parenthood that was filled with joy. But when facing new experiences, feelings of confusion, fear and exhaustion may emerge. Preparing breakfast, adjusting to new routines, staying up when the child is crying – all while balancing work and family demands. This can affect the family's well-being. In this regard, the Bersamamu Programme and Project ARIF have helped many young couples in early marriage and parenthood, providing religious guidance, medical perspectives and practical skills like financial planning. May I ask about the latest developments on Project ARIF and Bersamamu Programme – how many young couples have benefited from these initiatives? Are there plans to expand services, especially in mental health and wellness support for young couples? Additionally, can we consider strengthening collaboration with programmes like KidSTART so family support can be implemented continuously? How will Government increase its outreach and ensure young couples know about these programmes? With an increasing number of multi-generational families and seniors, our social landscape is clearly changing. I have often advocated on the need to focus on our seniors. At the national level, there are many efforts supporting seniors in their golden years.”
“Thank you, Chairman. I have three clarifications. The first is on blue spaces for Minister of State Alvin Tan. I was very excited to hear more about the new Marine Science Centre. Could he please clarify how will its work complement existing efforts, for example, of St John's Island National Marine Laboratory and other institutions like the Singapore Oceanarium Research and Learning Centre, holistically, and how can Singaporeans, youths and citizen scientists be involved in its work? Next, could he also share more on the plans for the second Marine Park's recreational spaces, and what lessons can be learnt from the first Sister Islands Marine Park? I also note that the second Marine Park, which includes Lazarus South and Kusu, generally have higher levels of human activity, for example, Kusu during the pilgrimage season, and Lazarus South, for example, recreational spaces and tiny homes. So, how will MND take this into consideration, for example, in terms of zoning and visitor management, when designating this second park, so that we can protect our habitats and minimise pressure on the environment? My second clarification is for Singapore Parliamentary Secretary Syed Harun, regarding lessons learnt from the SRSF and JSS-OR pilots, including in Ang Mo Kio, where I serve. For example, some who work as delivery riders have asked if there can be motorcycle lots provided, and also, as there are residents who have certain health and well-being challenges, can MND look at centralising more services beyond the example given, which was New Hope, who already does a very good job, I should add. My last question is just for further help on supporting divorcees, as I asked in my cut.”
“Second, singles up till now can typically only purchase 2-room, Flexi or resale flats, given that two-room flexi flats are highly sought after by both singles and seniors, can the Ministry consider expanding the options? After all, many also support elderly parents who stay with them if there are emergencies or help with nieces and nephews on the weekend. Finally, for those who want a space of their own, but cannot afford it yet, the Ministry trialed two housing typologies in recent years, the Single Room Shared Facilities (SRSF) and the Joint Singles Scheme Operator-Run. As both models were well subscribed, what are the plans to expand the scope of these programmes? How many rental families has the home ownership support team served over the years? What are the success rates so far and are there plans to integrate —”
“Have our public housing offerings fully adapted to these changes? Perhaps a re-diversifying of housing typologies might need to follow to support the needs and aspirations of a changing Singapore over Singaporeans' life course. A wider spectrum of options would allow citizens to find housing that matches not just income, but also life stage and aspirations. In my earlier speeches, I have spoken on the need to better support couples and families who want to stay near or with family members. In the earlier days, a young couple who first purchases a 3-room BTO can aspire to other versions of home over the years, such as a jumbo flat, maisonette, executive apartment, or even low rise and terrace public housing. These options provide more configurations and variety of life one can look forward to beyond hacking and expanding rooms or moving from public housing to private dwellings, which can increasingly feel unattainable. Today, flat typologies have largely remained the same, and in fact become even more similar as we optimise for speed and scale. How has MND reviewed the housing aspirations of Singaporeans, and can MND consider exploring some unique typologies in upcoming projects, for example, dual key or modular layout suitable for caregiving? I would like to speak briefly for three other segments. First, for a divorcee trying to re-establish a roof over his or her head. Many experience long waiting times, high temporary rental costs and uncertainty. Beyond schemes like Assistance Scheme for Second-Timers (ASSIST), can MND consider other forms of support for this segment to find new beginnings?”
“Could NParks update on the initiatives it has undertaken to strengthen ecological connectivity and biodiversity-sensitive designs across green and blue spaces in the last five years, as well as any future plans? At the same time, we recognise that our people are joint inhabitants in our city in nature. Part of our national vision is the goal that every household is 10 minutes away from a park. This also means that wildlife is 10 minutes away from us, increasing the number of wildlife human interactions and sometimes clashes – from monkeys to otters, wild boars to snakes, hornbills to tapirs, sambar deer to migrating storks. I would like to ask, has MND observed any trend lines in incidents in the past five years, including of migratory animals? And has MND assessed if the current plans, response teams and protocols remain adequate? How does MND see the long-term approach balance between containment, deterrence and co-existence? Finally, are we investing enough in public education such that city in nature is understood as a shared goal and responsibility beyond tree planting? Diversity in Housing Typologies Singapore's public housing system has also been globally recognised for delivering accessible quality housing at scale. Our homes not only provide shelter but also build communities and encourage social cohesion in estates. While home ownership rates remain fairly high compared to other cities, the focus has typically been on supporting young couples and first timers with the rising cost, which is of course, net crucial for nation building. But population and family planning dynamics today are changing. Given our ageing society, total fertility rate, marriage and divorce rates. We have more singles, second timers and seniors who strongly desire to age in place.”
“Thank you, Chairman. Sir, Singapore has been recognised globally for being one of the greenest cities in the world. Despite extensive urbanisation, our green cover spans a remarkable 40% of land area. This is only possible through the commitment and intentionality of each generation. In 2020, MND launched their vision to transform Singapore into a city in nature. Nature is not about aesthetics. We have learnt since young that nature is functional. Different species play respective roles and in the ecosystem they work together. As climate infrastructure, tree canopies and green buffer zones mitigate the urban heat island effect, lowering cooling demand and making active mobility possible. Socially, nature serves as recreational and exercise spaces, supporting mental well-being and as restorative spaces. Economically, tourists are drawn to our city in nature identity right from the time they leave the airport. Nature is the only infrastructure that cools, protects, filters and regenerates simultaneously. Many see urbanisation as the opposite of nature, but Singapore's lived experience of how we have balanced the two offers a different perspective. It is part of what makes us exceptional. If we plan it well, nature will not compete with our urban future development plans, it will secure it. In this regard, could MND share how it has weighed trade-offs and integrated nature, including preservation of existing flora and fauna into design principles for newer and upcoming housing estates towards improving heat resilience and tackling rising sea level challenges? Under MND's push for city nature, several 2030 targets have been laid out, including animal and plant species recovery plans, as well as forest, marine and coastal habitat restoration. I commend these efforts.”
“Thank you, Chairman. I have three follow-up questions. The first is regarding food resilience and the initial plans for the Lim Chu Kang Agri-District. Could the Minister of State please elaborate on that. The second, I am very glad to hear of the top-up to the ACT Fund. Does the Ministry track progress and utility of the funds dispersed and are there details of project closures or unsuccessful projects once disbursed? The last one is on flood resilience. I am glad to hear about the plans to build community resilience. Could the Senior Parliamentary Secretary please elaborate, beyond the PUB SMS alert service, are there emergency rescue and evacuation drills that the PUB intends to carry out?”
“Could the Ministry share how aquacultural farms are transitioning towards climate resilience systems, such as hybrid or re-circulating agricultural technologies as well as the take-up rates of support schemes, the extent of transition across the sector and any key challenges in scaling the adoption of such technologies. Beyond productivity improvements, sustained demand for local produce matters. To boost local demand amidst import competition, I understand the Ministry work with industry partners to establish an industry level supply and demand aggregator. Could the Ministry provide an assessment of its effectiveness in strengthening demand for local produce and plans to further support market development? How else can the public be engaged? Climate pressures across our water do not operate in silos. As risks intensify, adaptation will become more complex and costly. If our island city state is to be resilient, we must strengthen the integrity of our systems from infrastructure to industry to individuals. Climate Adaptation Capability Building”
“Sir, as an island nation, Singapore's safety and sustainability is closely linked to the health of our coastal, water and marine ecosystems. Climate change places going pressure on these interconnected systems. Rising sea levels affect coastal protection. More intense rainfall test flood resilience and warming seas affect aquaculture stability. I would like to seek the Ministry's views in two main areas. First, on flood resilience. We have observed increased in average annual rainfall and the frequency of heavy rainfall with annual rainfall rising about 83 millimetre per decade since 1980. Whilst Singapore has progressively upgraded drainage infrastructure, it is neither practical nor cost effective to size drains for the most extreme storm events only. As rainfall intensities are projected to increase, some residual flood risks may need to be managed at community level during extreme events. Could the Ministry share how Singapore strengthening community flood resilience, including public preparedness and local response capabilities in flood-prone areas? Will the Ministry consider a map perhaps, or improved alert system? Secondly, on climate resilience, agricultural and food resilience. As of 2023, Singapore had 98 sea-based and 33 land-based seafood farms. Most farms are concentrated in near shore coastal waters, where sea space and environmental conditions impact farm viability. Could the Ministry provide an update on recent trends in the number of aquacultural farms, including any consolidation or exit and what the trend might indicate about the sustainability of the sector? These coastal farms are highly sensitive to surrounding marine conditions and have experienced environmental stresses.”
“How can Active SG credits help people find new pickleball doubles partners, try a badminton class together? And could mentoring programmes for young professionals have mentors who guide their mentees in small groups or industry fellowships, which do the same? Next, as informal family care remains central, how can we better support couples and families who want to stay near family members? Beyond broadening housing typologies, which I will speak about in the Ministry of National Development (MND) COS, some seniors now hesitate to move in with their children as it could affect eligibility criteria of certain schemes, such as healthcare subsidies, the Home Caregiving Grant, where seniors adult children's incomes will be factored in, if they are living together. Given the cost pressures on families today, especially for those with young children, could we review mean-testing thresholds for certain support schemes? A final point. Not everyone may be so fortunate to have family support. I reiterate my call to form parenting circles within neighbourhoods where parents can opt in to share baby items and figure out this phase of life together. This can be done in a systematic way, for example, through Short Message Service (SMSes) sent out by the Government at certain milestones – six months or one year. This time period is important as social isolation within the early years of parenthood correlates with lower fertility intentions for a second child. Singapore Made For Families”
“Thank you, Sir. Prime Minister Lawrence Wong was a great hype-man for Minister Indranee so I am really looking forward to her speech. In my past speeches, I have made calls for better fertility health support, including on subsidies, immune deficiency foundation treatments and health screenings. In my Budget speech yesterday, I spoke about how our super-aged society status and low TFR presents an existential challenge. Over the past few years, the Government has made significant efforts, including our Made For Families plan. These are deeply personal decisions, and we must frame it sensitively and optimistically for younger Singaporeans to feel hopeful about having someone to have and to hold through good and bad times in life. I urge the Government to continue to respond meaningfully, not incrementally, and consider what are the most meaningful ways between direct cash transfers to offset costs, provision of services, such as childcare, or even tax measures. Today, I will focus on forming and flourishing families. Sir, love cannot be legislated, but more conducive environments perhaps can be designed. Many youths share how a lack of time and opportunities to meet people as well as economic and social anxieties are some barriers to romance. Facilitating intentional opportunities to meet new people once youths have left school outside of the grind of work and repeated proximity in shared context, for example, through hobby communities or even volunteering, could ignite a spark. Could we weave some of this into our design of schemes to gently create opportunities for social interaction? For example, a version of the Culture Pass to encourage shared experiences. By bundling special tickets for two and encourage bringing someone else along.”
“Thank you, Chairman and I thank the Deputy Prime Minister for his speech as well. I have two clarification questions. The first is really in the acknowledgement that Singapore is a small player and at the same time, we continue to be a trusted partner to others who are on the same journey as us. Could Deputy Prime Minister please share more, whether there are plans, especially if the recent Green Skills Report and opportunities for us to expand to provide talent to wider Asia, beyond just creating good jobs for our people, this will also allow us to build closer relationships regionally for greater effort. And my second clarification is on transparency and plans for transition allowances, moving forward.”
“The recently published Green Skills Report defines what are green jobs and green skills, finding that such competencies are being integrated into mainstream roles, not just specialist jobs, with about 5,000 workers projected to be needed by 2030. It also reviewed more than a hundred existing interventions and programmes which have been implemented by agencies and stakeholders thus far. How successful have current interventions been, in terms of translating into jobs filled and income growth for Singaporeans? How can Singapore grow into a green skills hub for ASEAN and the wider Asian region? Finally, amid the evolving technological landscape with increased adoption of AI, advanced manufacturing and digital systems, how is Singapore building a pipeline of hybrid green digital talent? At the heart of it, is how Singapore can sustain credible climate action while remaining competitive and building capabilities needed for the transition. No single country, especially one as small and trade-exposed as ours, can solve this alone. Greener Careers”
“Sir, the new global order, AI advancements and climate pressures are reshaping economies, lives and livelihoods. Climate change is not a distant threat. Its impact is already felt. 2024 was one of the warmest years on record, with total rainfall 8.1% above the long-term annual average. But around the world broadly, the momentum for climate action has slowed. A report by Climate Forecasting Consortium's Inevitable Policy Response showed that decelerating or regressive policy surged by over 500% in 2025. In Singapore, many companies want to transition, yet some may lack the expertise. Others, particularly large emitters, find it not so easy to pivot and require high capital investments to improve efficiencies and transform their operations. In some sectors, commercially viable low carbon substitutes are not yet available at scale. In this regard, I seek the Government's views in three areas. In a world where climate action is slowing or increasingly becoming politicised, how will Singapore maintain credibility of our carbon tax policy while ensuring that industries remain competitive and our country is economically viable, especially vis-à-vis other countries in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Last year, I raised a Parliamentary Question regarding the structuring of transition allowances. Sir, we should remain transparent about allowances and committed in our push towards decarbonisation. Could the Ministry share more about future plans for the use of transitional allowances and purchasing of international carbon credits to ease near-term pressures, while ensuring that the integrity of our carbon price signal remains strong? Beyond carbon policies, the transition will also depend on whether firms and workers can adapt.”
“We must think structurally, not incrementally and across life stages from childhood confidence, to workforce resilience, to ageing with purpose as one congruent Singapore story. If we design intentionally and strengthen the compact between generations, then longevity will not feel lonely and will not weaken Singapore. And whether one comes home to a large reunion, bringing the next generation along, or a small gathering, or a community who becomes family – every generation of Singaporeans should know, that they always have a place at our national table.”
“Finally, the generation of seniors today, is more digitally savvy and living longer than before. By 2050, nearly half of Singaporeans are projected to be over 65. That represents valuable wisdom and experience which should be tapped on. Ageing is also about dignity and purpose. In Ang Mo Kio, 40% of our residents are over 60 years old. Their life stories and gentle resilience, inspire me deeply. While efforts, such as the Enhancement for Active Seniors (EASE) 2.0 and the Silver Upgrading Programme make ageing in place more possible, we must continue to design empowering upgrades and inclusive spaces so they feel confident to participate in community life instead of taking a deficit-based approach to thinking about what they cannot do. And in the midst of all the upgrading and construction to do so, we must also be mindful in the process, how even changes in pedestrian walkways, lack of lifts or escalators at overhead bridges, can result in our seniors being fearful of leaving their house to do their favourite market run and end up staying isolated home alone. I hope that over time, public spaces and Active Ageing Centres can evolve into intergenerational hubs, where grandparenting sessions are a norm, seniors mentor youths and take on micro-work opportunities, even as some recover in community. Mr Speaker, Sir, at reunion dinners and at iftar, we instinctively make space for one another. It may be slightly jarring going between lohei and terawih in this period, but this is also, what it is, as the beauty of a multi-religious and multiracial society. This Budget challenges us to do the same at a national level. It is the first Budget of our super-aged phase.”
“I hope that every family in Singapore will continue to have faith – that we will stand together through thick and thin and remain confident that the prosperity we build will be inclusive and benefit every family. (In English): By 2030, around 100,000 seniors are expected to require assistance with daily living. While many rely on foreign domestic workers or care services for the day to day, caregiving does not end at the door. Sons and daughters from the sandwiched generation continue to carry the quiet responsibilities with love – the emotional vigilance, decision-making, unexpected hospital appointments and the guilt of not being able to be there. Enhancements to the Home Caregiving Grant (HCG) are very welcome. But we should also encourage structured parental care leave frameworks and employers who go the extra mile to support employees. Today, many rely on annual leave and career often competes with caregiving responsibilities until a point where one feels like they have to tap out of the workforce, especially for women who tend to disproportionately carry the caregiving load; having stronger caregiver support frameworks, including hospital post-discharge protocols, as well as helping caregivers begin again after their loved ones are no longer around. I hope we broaden the qualifying criteria of the HCG to include those who are unable to work due to mental health conditions, instead of only assessing by activities of daily living. And finally, we must keep an eye out for particularly vulnerable double ageing segments, such as the persons with disabilities and caregiver dyad. An ageing society with changing family structures requires caregiving language and norms to evolve – we cannot keep stressing family systems until they break.”
“However, the reality we must face is that the TFR of Malays is now below the population replacement rate, at 1.58 in 2024. Among young people, marriage plans are increasingly being postponed because they need to prioritise building their careers and financial stability to cope with challenging living costs. For young couples who fall into the “sandwich generation”, pressure and time constraints lead to decisions to have one or two children, something that requires significant consideration. Therefore, we need to rebuild the “kampong” for our families and strengthen support networks. Whether these are families transitioning from rental flats to their own flats, single mothers or fathers raising children or caregivers who sacrifice their careers to care for elderly parents, all Singaporeans need to feel that support is always available, and systems are easily accessible for them to get help. Some families in our community still depend on a single source of income. This makes them more vulnerable to economic uncertainty. When their source of income is affected, they worry whether their daily needs can be met. Whatever choices families make in childcare arrangements, women who take career breaks should always feel that the door remains open for them to return to work and fulfil their aspirations if they choose to do so. I applaud initiatives, such as MARA Mentoring by MENDAKI and the SkillsFuture Job Seeker Support Scheme by WSG. However, in an era of rapid change, more support is needed. I would like to call for opportunities for mid-career workers continue to be strengthened, including mentor programmes and buddy systems for those going through transition phases.”
“For youths, I hope to see more structured, meaningful internships for learning, not as proving ground, to become the norm. Today, some stack internships out of pressure, not purpose. Students from lower-income families sometimes feel torn about pursuing an internship they are passionate about versus the opportunity to work for their households. And when some graduates turn to internships instead of full-time roles, we must ask how else we can support the school-to-work transition. Organisations like The Astronaut's Collective, Access Singapore and Halogen run programmes that help facilitate exposure to career opportunities for, among others, disadvantaged students to broaden their horizons to the possibilities they may not even know of. I hope that such important work can further be scaled. Work-study pathways should be integrated into curriculum, not peripheral as just stand-alone programmes and industry co-development of curricula should deepen. For mid-career workers, reinvention must be normalised. In a potential hundred-year life, this may translate to multiple careers across our lifetime. Conversion programmes should be strengthened with concrete employment outcomes, so that these transitions feel like renewal, not regression. It is clear that our Government takes an active stance on ensuring that: one, there are high quality jobs for Singaporeans; and two, that Singaporeans are well equipped with the skills to take on these jobs. Having said the above, we should also consider the social and emotional dimensions of how an older workforce responds to such rapid change and support them. Sir, in Malay, please. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Sir, family is the bedrock of our society's strength.”
“We must build on this momentum, through changing mindsets about shared responsibilities and consider adjusting childcare leave proportionately to the number of children a couple has; enhancing flexible working arrangements which are crucial for many modern, dual-income households; normalising career pauses and supporting re-entry for both men and women; improving opportunities for access to housing with more space or that are nearer other family members for support. This is the invisible infrastructure of fertility – when parents trust the system, there is less anxiety about parenthood and there may be a greater willingness to give it a go. As every child is precious, we must also make sure that every child is safe. Preschool and student care oversight needs to be strengthened, so parents have peace of mind when leaving their children for the day. Our systems must also hold the most vulnerable of children with care and competence. Whether under child protection, in residential care homes or in the juvenile justice system, we must strengthen safeguarding standards and empower officers working with these children, through adequate resourcing and coordinated support across agencies to intervene and tackle the root of the issue. The system must fight for them, not fail them, as these children are part of our national family too. Demographic change also reshapes our workforce. The number of citizens aged 80 and older have increased by approximately 60% over the past decade. Budget 2026 strengthens workforce support, such as the expansion of AI training under the TechSkills Accelerator. But disruption is already here – long-term unemployment of those under 30 is higher than pre-pandemic norms and mid-career transitions are lengthening.”
“Sir, in an ageing society, every cohort of children grows smaller. This means fewer classmates, siblings, workers and caregivers. In 2024, 29,237 new Dragon babies were born – one of whom was our son Mizan. Every child is not just precious, but pivotal in securing Singapore's place in the world. When couples consider parenthood, they are not just calculating financial costs across their children's lifetime; they are assessing confidence – be it in childcare access, sufficient housing, quality of life, our climate, the way the world is going in what the stakes are like to raise a child. Before we were fortunate to have Mizan in our sixth year of marriage, my husband and I would often talk about the kind of parents that we hope to be, the kind of Singapore that he might grow up in. Budget 2026 includes financial measures, such as Child LifeSG Credits and Community Development Council (CDC) vouchers, and for some parents, this means a few months of milk powder covered, which is much appreciated. Over the past two years, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong highlighted the Government's support for a Singapore Made For Families. One substantial policy shift has been the expansion of paternity and additional 10 weeks of shared parental leave during that precious first few months. Beyond monetary support, these are the kind of changes that help to make family "feel" possible in Singapore.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I rise in support of Budget 2026. Over the past week, many have moved between reunion, Ramadan and reflection – with meals shared around the table. Some tables are full, while others have empty seats. Elders with their time-honoured recipes, children pulled up close with baby chairs and extra seats pulled out at the last minute. We make space for each other, instinctively. Budget 2026 is delivered at this festive and reflective moment, set against a backdrop of profound structural change. The global order is fracturing, job augmentations facilitated by technology are accelerating and economic competition is intensifying. The World Economic Forum's Future of Jobs Report projects that nearly 40% of skills being used in today's workforce will change by 2030. Global trade tensions continue to intensify, with the value of goods hit by new tariffs quadrupling in the past year to the highest level in over 15 years. But there is another transformation, which is equally consequential that we must confront. As of this year, we are now an officially super-aged society, with more than 21% of our resident population 65 or above. At the same time, our resident total fertility rate (TFR) stands at less than half the replacement rate. The issue is personal, existential and urgent. An ageing society is not simply about older persons. It reshapes childhood, work, caregiving, retirement and community life for everyone. If we prepare late and view ageing as a burden, we will have to manage decline. But if we prepare early, perhaps we can design longevity with meaning through our years. Today, I will speak about how we must respond across the life course, so that every Singaporean continues to have a place at our national table.”
“Thank you, Speaker, and thank you to the Senior Minister of State as well. I have three follow-up supplementary questions. The first is really on the last point about accessing the food safety grading. While I understand that the new regime will provide more up-to-date grading, I think there is also something about a physical decal making it front-and-centre for consumers to be able to consider. So, will the Ministry consider including a physical decal requirement to be updated as and when the grade may change? My second one is, I had asked about the measurement of the effectiveness of this change in regime. Could the Ministry elaborate whether there will be any outcome-based indicators beyond inspection performance? For example, outbreak severity or recurrence rates that will be checked alongside these compliance indicators? My third and final one is, while SAFE strengthens assurance at the food establishment level, food safety risks can also originate earlier on in the chain – from import to processing to storage and distribution. I hope to understand how SAFE fits within the broader food safety and public health architecture, if possible.”
“Government agencies are changing our practices in two ways. One, where there is no need to accurately identify someone, most agencies have stopped using the NRIC number completely. Two, where individuals must be identified accurately, agencies are starting to use the full NRIC number instead, such as in official documents like licences and employment letters issued by the Government. For the private sector, the Government will consult the public before making any changes to guidelines for the use of partial NRIC numbers. We will ensure that we balance protecting personal data and meeting legitimate business needs. Since June 2025, we have been educating the public about proper NRIC number use through social media, traditional media, roadshows and community touchpoints. We will continue our national campaign across multiple platforms in English and vernacular languages to raise public awareness and understanding on the proper use of NRIC numbers. We recognise that organisations need time to adapt to these changes. During this transition period, we encourage the public to continue reporting cases where NRIC numbers are mishandled, as the feedback helps us ensure proper implementation.”
“Question No 8. The Minister of State for Digital Development and Information (Ms Jasmin Lau) (for the Minister for Digital Development and Information): In January 2025, the Government explained through a Ministerial Statement, its plans to improve the way National Registration Identity Card (NRIC) numbers are used. We are making progress in two main areas: stopping the misuse of NRIC numbers as passwords for authentication, in other words, to prove you are who you claim to be; and also, moving away from the use of partial NRIC numbers for identification. I will elaborate on these two areas. First, we are committed to stopping the use of NRIC numbers for authentication. Your NRIC number should not be used like a password because other people might know it. Government agencies stopped this practice over a year ago and we are now working with private organisations to do the same. The Personal Data Protection Commission and Cyber Security Agency have issued guidance to all private organisations. Government agencies, such as the Infocomm Media Development Authority, the Monetary Authority of Singapore and the Ministry of Health, are also working with sectors like telecommunications, finance and insurance and healthcare to take action to stop this practice. While organisations will have adequate time to adjust their practices for compliance, those that flagrantly misuse NRIC numbers can be penalised under the Personal Data Protection Act. Second, we are moving away from the use of partial NRIC numbers, starting with the public sector. Partial NRIC numbers, like the last four characters, are not reliable for identifying people because some individuals share the same partial NRIC numbers. Some individuals even share both the same name and partial NRIC number.”
“(In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Thank you, Mr Speaker, and also to the Senior Parliamentary Secretary for the explanation. I would like to add two supplementary questions. If I am not mistaken, there are already planning guidelines for the types of activities and use of premises in the areas closest to Sultan Mosque. Will the Government consider reviewing whether the coverage of that area should be extended to other parts of the Kampong Gelam area to ensure that business activities are aligned with cultural heritage values and local community functions, as well as promote suitable activities that foster local entrepreneurial spirit? (In English): And the second supplementary question in English, please. Heritage districts, such as Kampong Gelam, often function not only as conserved heritage spaces but also as natural entry platforms for culturally rooted and community-based enterprises because they offer visibility, clustering effects and market access that support early brand formation. And I am sure many agree that there have been younger brands that have grown in Kampong Gelam, which introduced local flavours to the community and to tourists. Has the Government considered whether conservation and place management approaches could also incorporate elements of business incubation and structured tenant mix to encourage some of these younger businesses?”
“Thank you, Speaker, and I thank the Minister and her Ministry for working so hard at food resilience. Singaporeans love food and we import more than 90%, so this is real important work. I have two supplementary questions. The first is really on global partnerships as the new pillar. Could the Minister elaborate a little bit more about how certain regions, which we are exploring these partnerships with, the strategy behind identifying these regional priorities? And secondly, could the Minister also describe a little bit more about what sort of collaborations are being pursued as part of the partnerships, be it trade in essential supplies, as mentioned with New Zealand, or also co-investments or technology collaboration, long-term offtake agreements, and so forth?”
“Thank you, Speaker, and I really appreciate the Minister of State's assurance. I recognise, especially for those with special needs, there may be alternative schemes, for example, through SG Enable. However, for the care recipients who are facing mental health conditions, could the Minister of State clarify what sort of testing? Because for the mental health condition and the doctor issues a total permanent disability, is there an equivalent sort of testing which can be offered to assess ADL, in order for them to qualify for this scheme? Because my understanding on the ground is that this is a little harder to do; and for mental health conditions, there is not as many schemes available.”
“Thank you, Speaker, and I thank the Minister of State for her response. In an ageing estate, such as Ang Mo Kio, the HCG is very much appreciated. And while primarily designed for seniors, my understanding is that it is also designed to recognise other forms of caregivers. And so, I have two supplementary questions. The first, for those with autism and intellectual disabilities, can the Minister of State clarify whether the individual must also separately meet the Activity of Daily Living (ADL) criteria? If so, would the Agency for Integrated Care (AIC) consider decoupling this? As the care recipients also have some level of independence and we want to encourage them to maintain these ADLs; the caregivers would greatly appreciate the support. Secondly, while caregiving needs may present differently across physical health and mental health conditions, the intensity and impact on caregivers are equally significant. So, could I check whether the Government can extend the HCG to care recipients who are facing diagnosed mental health conditions and, if necessary, to introduce the appropriate criteria similar to ADLs for this qualification?”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker, and I thank the Senior Minister of State for his response. My follow-up questions are really around what sort of mental health conditions will this framework cater for, in terms of the availability of jobs? And is there a planned duration for which support will be provided for persons with mental health conditions and in recovery who are seeking jobs?”
“I am truly inspired, especially with grandmothers who can still work part-time, diligently cook and care for their grandchildren. For our seniors, I hope it will be easier for them to access mental health care so that it does not feel strange to them and we can mitigate their apprehension towards health screenings. Seniors must feel that seeing a doctor is akin to working with a personal coach who can improve their quality of life. As a community, we must go beyond traditional approaches and collaborate with various agencies to reach out to seniors. Places of worship like the Al-Mutaqqin Mosque have started efforts to engage elderly congregants through sharing on health topics and estate planning. These sessions are delivered in practical and sensitive ways by weaving together these topics with religious guidance. For seniors and those who care for them, even as the seasons of life change, this season can be just as beautiful. Many conditions can be treated if addressed early. Support is always available and many are willing to walk with you, accompanying you in every step of your journey. (In English): Sir, as we weather international crises and uncertainties, we must protect the hearts and minds of our people. As our only national resource, a healthy population is key to the long-term stability and prosperity of Singapore. As we celebrate SG60 this year, I am reminded that our story has always been one of people who have stood together and overcome the odds. Indeed, it is a story of "we". Let us bring that same spirit to improve mental health. Every school, a place of nurture and safety; every workplace, a circle of purpose and care; every home, a source of strength and love; every neighbourhood, a compassionate community together. I support the Motion.”
“I was heartened with the announcement in Budget 2025, that as part of the upcoming enhancements to the Home Caregiving Grant, the Government will raise the quantum and maximum qualifying per capita household income thresholds for the Home Caregiving Grant. At present, the qualifying criteria is based on someone permanently requiring some assistance with at least three of the six activities of daily living. In this term, I hope the Government will recognise caregivers to persons who have mental health conditions which render them unfit to work too. Such support, particularly for caregivers facing health or ageing challenges of their own would be much appreciated. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Sir, more than 40% of residents in Ang Mo Kio GRC are aged 60 and above. Our seniors possess invaluable experience and the nation's collective memory, having lived through pandemics and global crises. I deeply appreciate our seniors for often sharing their advice while their encouragement lifts my spirits. Many seniors have shared with me that they feel the pressures of change, such as declining health and retirement, which disrupt their daily routines. Additionally, they experience the loss of old friends and family members who, as they grow older, begin to live farther apart. The resilience they have built over the years has taught them to endure challenges, so feelings of distress are often kept hidden in silence. As a result, seniors may feel lonely. Some uncles have shared with me their desire to remain active. However, their spirits wane when they are beset by chronic illnesses that require ongoing attention. Sometimes, fading memory or hearing problems can also lead them to withdraw from others. Sir, we need to celebrate the resilience of our seniors.”
“Seniors do not have the same vocabulary to search symptoms online like our youth. We need to think about local neighbourhoods as a community of first responders and equip primary care as a critical touchpoint for prevention, as these conditions first materialise as somatic concerns, such as pains or insomnia sometime. Beyond the good work of the Silver Generation Office, Active Ageing Centres and the community centres, can we leverage technology and have automated messages regularly reminding seniors of health and well-being support, similar to messages which new parents, such as myself, receive when our babies hurt certain months in age. A text or push notification could remind them that they are not alone. An elderly who would often come to my meet-the-people sessions week after week with a different challenge, once stopped short and said, "I just want someone to know that I am still alive." More often than not, out of good intentions, we tend to share with our seniors, "It is dangerous, you should not do that, be careful." This deficit approach diminishes their confidence. As we reshape the ageing narrative, I hope we take a strengths-based approach to emphasise to our seniors what they can do. Finally, carers and caregivers have a crucial role in one's mental health journey, as their companionship and support are integral to persons in recovery. Where the person in recovery was a breadwinner, a carer may step in to take on additional financial responsibility as well as a new role, ensuring medical adherence. A person in recovery and carer's story is one of strength. Especially for ageing parents who care for their adult children with mental health conditions, it is testimony to unconditional love with little respect.”
“Can workshops be made more accessible in our neighbourhoods to improve mental health literacy and equip parents to have hard conversations with their children? After all, there is no school of parenting when a child comes into our lives, and as a first-time mom, I will be the first to admit that parents are learning as we become parents too. I understand that the Ministry of Social and Family Development will introduce a new model of support for the health needs of families under the ComLink+ scheme. I urge the Ministry to consider including mental well-being in the updated model, as vulnerable families often face instability and decision fatigue as well as a significant bandwidth tax. Sir, while Singapore is set to become super-aged next year, Ang Mo Kio is well on its way as a super-aged town with a diverse population of seniors, each with their own life experiences and challenges. We often speak about youths transitioning to the workforce, facing uncertainty, but less is spoken about older adults, who stop work and are confronted with a loss of identity, companions or health, becoming empty nesters or taking on a caregiving role to a spouse. Sometimes, these stressors compound, resulting in harmful or suicidal thoughts among older adults. One of the most difficult parts of being our people's representatives is sitting in wakes or on the living room floor the morning after or waiting for the ambulance next to a cold canvas in the immediate aftermath. Our seniors have given so much of themselves to see Singapore become what she is today. I only hope that we can help them feel supported as they age. 希望我亲爱的乐龄可以安享晚年. I call on the Government to consider a targeted strategy in caring for our seniors' mental health.”
“Secondly, I hope there can be stronger support for their re-integration into the workforce once they are ready. While there are support services such as the Institute of Mental Health (IMH) Job Club, it is unclear how many individuals these services have supported as a proportion of those who have sought help, and the range of jobs available for persons with different qualifications, as well as the progress of the job fit assessment and referral framework by the National Council of Social Servce to ensure a longer term fit between employer and employees with different kinds of conditions. Worries about the cost of treatments remain a key barrier. Sir, besides MediShield and public subsidies available for the management of mental illnesses under the chronic disease management programme (CDMP), I hope the Government can consider expanding the mental health conditions covered under the CDMP and increase the subsidies coverage for mental health treatments. Recovery is often non-linear, requiring consistent treatment, and the costs incurred for one to receive quality and timely support can be prohibitive. I echo my appeal for the Government to coordinate a framework and improve access to insurance coverage for persons with mental health conditions. Sir, a study by the National University of Singapore found a gap in parents' understanding of mental health conditions. Under the National Mental Health and Well-being Strategy, the "Parenting for Wellness" toolbox for parents was released. How can we work with parents to understand and put this into practice in a bite-sized and practical way, like how I consult Instagram Reels at night to find out whether I have gentle-parented my son hard enough, or could I actually have fed what I fed him at 10 months old.”
“Sir, for many youths who are conscious about the world that we live in, the future seems uncertain as calamities increase, leading to a sense of hopelessness that this is the world and the systems that they have inherited. Despite their willingness to take action, some feel wary to create change as an individual, questioning the impact which they can make as one person in the face of bigger nations and corporations. This Government is taking serious steps to fortify our food supply chains, tackle rising sea levels and develop innovative cooling systems towards heat resilience. Climate change is a wicked problem of the generation. It is important to deepen their knowledge as part of school curriculum and involve them as co-creators to climate solutions and a voice at the table. So, I was very grateful to hear the Prime Minister's speech earlier. Building accurate understanding and active participation will help move helplessness to agency and foster a shared mission, like Captain Planet. With a volatile economy and reports of company layoffs, many working adults feel greater stress that is coupled with cost-of-living worries. For some, the need to earn and provide, pretend that everything is okay, results in them pushing past the point of burnout, requiring more intensive and longer treatments. Some are concerned about gaps in their curriculum vitae and stigma by employers, leading to potential unemployment should they take that much-needed step to seek treatment. For this group of individuals who require time off from work, I hope we can consider some form of interim credits or allowance to help with basic living costs, as schemes such as ComCare often do not apply. To be self-aware and recognise one's need to rest is courage. To commit oneself to recovery is strength.”