Ong Hua Han
Singapore
“Thank you, Chair. I would like to thank Senior Parliamentary Secretary Eric Chua for addressing most of my cuts and also for all he has done to uplift PwDs. I have just one clarification for the Senior Parliamentary Secretary.”
“Madam, in my Budget debate speech, I highlighted the need to take more active steps to enhance community integration, through recreational sports.”
“This can be done through awareness training for both employers and employees. Such training helps address common misconceptions around neurodivergent conditions. It also offers a platform to facilitate open discussion on potential workplace adjustments that can both accommodate neurodivergent employees and play to their strengths.”
“Just as we know to call 995 for medical emergencies, mental health helplines should be easily accessible through the app, to connect users to professional help immediately. Madam, awareness is also key. Collaboration with mental health organisations and other health apps can gradually expose more people to mental health first aid.”
“MoneySense already promotes financial literacy through online resources and ad hoc talks, and then there are other organisations, such as The Volunteer Switchboard, who partners with corporates to conduct workshops for a select group of ITE students.”
“SEN officers play a crucial role in supporting students with special needs. According to MOE, "the number of SEN officers in mainstream schools has increased from around 450 in 2017 to about 680 as of July 2024".”
The complete record
Every one of 104 lines we hold for Ong Hua Han, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 1 of 3.
“Madam, in my Budget debate speech, I highlighted the need to take more active steps to enhance community integration, through recreational sports. Can the Ministry share an update on the progress of the Disability Sports Master Plan, since it was first introduced in 2016 and its refresh last year, as well as upcoming sporting initiatives to strengthen community integration and foster deeper inclusion?”
“Thank you, Chair. I would like to thank Senior Parliamentary Secretary Eric Chua for addressing most of my cuts and also for all he has done to uplift PwDs. I have just one clarification for the Senior Parliamentary Secretary. In one of my cuts, I highlighted that adults with invisible neuro-divergent conditions, especially those with lower support needs, they do not receive much institutional support post-education. I do not think this was addressed earlier, so I would appreciate MSF for sharing if there are any plans to look into this space and develop support measures for these individuals?”
“This can be done through awareness training for both employers and employees. Such training helps address common misconceptions around neurodivergent conditions. It also offers a platform to facilitate open discussion on potential workplace adjustments that can both accommodate neurodivergent employees and play to their strengths. On top of raising sufficient awareness, we must also ensure safe and fair disclosure practises and combat stigma. Similar to mental health conditions, perhaps the Government could introduce an advisory on providing support for employees with neurodivergent conditions. At the end of the day, this is about creating an inclusive society, one that recognises and values the contributions of all individuals. Let us ensure that support for neurodivergent individuals does not stop at the school gates but extends into the later stages of life.”
“By doing so, we empower more persons with disabilities to live with dignity and achieve their dreams. Neurodiversity in Working Adults Chair, we need to better support working adults who are neurodivergent. Over the years we have made progress in increasing support for neurodivergent students through special educational needs officers and school counsellors. Neurodivergent conditions such as autism, ADHD and dyslexia last a lifetime. Yet, beyond school, existing policies and programmes cater only to autistic individuals, mainly those with high support needs. A large proportion of neurodivergent adults are left to navigate life's challenges without institutional support when they enter the workforce. This is especially true for those with conditions such as ADHD and dyslexia, which are invisible and not formally recognised as disabilities in Singapore. Neurodivergent working adults face unique challenges. They may struggle with organisation, executive function, or navigating workplace expectations. Many are also hesitant to ask for accommodations or help, fearing stigma or uncertainty about how employers will respond. I urge the Ministry to take action in two key areas. First, in order to design effective policies, we need data. Can the Ministry conduct periodic national surveys to gauge the prevalence of neurodivergence in our adult population and the challenges faced by neurodivergent adults? A national survey can help us to understand how best to support neurodivergent adults in daily life and in the workplace. The Ministry can then craft targeted support measures that are evidence based and impactful. Second, we need to raise more awareness around neurodiversity, especially in the workplace.”
“I am very glad that the update to the Home Caregiving Grant, as announced in the Budget Statement, will extend financial support to more caregivers and affirm their contributions. While this is highly appreciated, caregivers also face emotional strain, physical exhaustion and the challenge of looking after their own well-being. Building on this, can MSF also share its plans to further support caregivers beyond financial assistance? Last year, I spoke about recalibrating our means-testing criteria for disability schemes, at the MSF COS. Reading this year's Budget annexes, I understand that the means-testing criteria will be revised for the better. 7.15 pm In particular, the monthly per capita household income (PCHI) threshold for long-term care subsidies and grants are set to be increased to a standardised level of $4,800 from 2026. Examples include the Assistive Technology Fund, the Enabling Transport Subsidy and Taxi Subsidy Scheme, just to name a few. According to Singapore Departmant of Statistics, median monthly PCHI has increased from $3,500 in 2023 to around $3,600 in 2024. I have previously suggested that the threshold should at least align with the current median PCHI figures. Assuming that median PCHI grows steadily, the harmonised threshold of $4,800 should exceed that level. I am pleased to see this update go beyond my initial suggestion to broaden access to support schemes. I urge MSF to continually review the PCHI threshold at timely intervals to ensure that it keeps pace with median PCHI levels as they rise. Following this progress, I would like to reiterate my call from last year that we also take into account actual costs borne by families with PwDs. Financial support schemes should reflect the real and often higher costs that these families face.”
“Thank you, Chairman. Sir, we have made much progress over the years in raising disability awareness and increasing the workplace participation of persons with disabilities. Coming from the private sector, I have witnessed first-hand the collective will and efforts of the Government, MSF, SG Enable, social service agencies and enterprises, commercial or otherwise, all working together to advance inclusive hiring. For this, I am thankful – to see our shared commitment to the cause translating bit by bit into meaningful opportunities for persons with disabilities. With five years left to meet the Enabling Masterplan 2030 target of 40% employment, can MSF share its plans to bring to life strategies that encourage and accelerate inclusive hiring? Empower PwDs for Work and Independence Persons with disabilities and their caregivers have long-term aspirations, just like anyone else. They want to actively participate in shared spaces, secure meaningful employment and live independently within the community. We have come a long way in providing more pathways for persons with disabilities to thrive. Yet, there is always more that can be done. I had previously called for more support in the post-18 space and I am delighted to hear it specifically highlighted in the Budget by the Prime Minister. Now that we are debating in the Committee of Supply (COS), can MSF share more about how it plans to strengthen support structures for persons with disabilities as they transition from school to work? In doing so, we also need to recognise the crucial role that caregivers play. They are the unseen pillar of strength, often putting their needs and dreams on hold to care for their loved ones.”
“Just as we know to call 995 for medical emergencies, mental health helplines should be easily accessible through the app, to connect users to professional help immediately. Madam, awareness is also key. Collaboration with mental health organisations and other health apps can gradually expose more people to mental health first aid. Social media campaigns can also help to promote this in creative ways. For example, Tampines Fire Station has been making viral Instagram videos for a while now, and they are quite funny. Perhaps, we could leverage on their expertise and do the same for mental health first aid. Lastly, such apps need to be regularly updated with the latest information and resources to keep the platform fresh and relevant. Maternity Fees for Mothers of Singapore Citizens”
“Mdm Chair, we all know the importance of first aid in medical emergencies. But not many know about its mental health equivalent, Mental Health First Aid, which trains people to support those in distress or facing a mental health crisis. While there are increasingly more courses available online, access to Mental Health First Aid remains limited. In Singapore, we are familiar with apps that facilitate emergency first aid response. Take, for example, the myResponder app by the Singapore Civil Defence Force, with over 210,000 registered community first responders. Their focus remains largely on physical health emergencies. But what about mental health? Mental health emergencies can also happen anywhere and to anyone. In those critical moments, the ability to respond quickly and appropriately is just as important. Yet, no widely recognised platform exists to guide people through a mental health crisis. This is a missing piece in our response framework, but we do not need to start from scratch. Integrating mental health first aid into existing emergency response apps is a practical solution with manifold benefits. First, destigmatisation. Mental health is health and this ensures it is treated as equally important as physical health. Second, increased accessibility and awareness. A widely-used platform increases the availability of mental health resources, reaching even those who have never encountered or attended formal training. Third, timely intervention. With step-by-step guidance readily available, users will be able to identify signs of distress and respond before a crisis escalates. Fourth, emergency contacts at your fingertips.”
“Sir, MDDI should take the lead in coordinating efforts across Government agencies to protect personal information. During the January Ministerial Statement, Minister Josephine Teo clarified that scammers are not known to directly use NRIC numbers to steal or unlock valuables. Still, NRIC numbers continue to serve as a gateway to accessing personal, but not secret, information in Singapore. Take, for example, the Eligibility Checker for the Matched Retirement Savings Scheme, on the Central Provident Fund (CPF) Board website. Anyone can check whether a senior has less than the Basic Retirement Sum in their Retirement Account, earns less than $4,000 a month, and if the annual value of their residence is below $21,000. All this information can be unlocked with a senior's NRIC number and date of birth. It may not be obvious how this information could be misused. But in the hands of scammers, it could be used to build credibility and manipulate vulnerable individuals through social engineering tactics. I appreciate the CPF Board's intent to make the eligibility checks convenient. However, with scams becoming more sophisticated, should we not re-consider the right balance between security and convenience more carefully? We must act with foresight to stay ahead of emerging threats. With its deep expertise in data protection, MDDI is best placed to help our Government agencies develop the instinct for proactive data security.”
“MoneySense already promotes financial literacy through online resources and ad hoc talks, and then there are other organisations, such as The Volunteer Switchboard, who partners with corporates to conduct workshops for a select group of ITE students. By formalising partnerships with more of such organisations and expanding funding behind this, we can increase outreach, build up quality resources and bring in skilled trainers to complement existing efforts. Imagine a future where every student graduates with the ability to manage their finances responsibly, a future where young Singaporeans feel confident and empowered to make sound financial decisions. By taking action today, we equip our youths with the knowledge and skills to secure their financial future. Addressing Unhealthy Social Media Use”
“Madam, one in three Gen Zs and Millennials do not feel confident in making sound financial decisions in times of economic stress. This was from a survey conducted by Etiqa Insurance in 2023. Many young Singaporeans were also found to have relatively low confidence in investing and building emergency funds. In our fast-changing financial landscape, young Singaporeans have more to grapple with than previous generations. We must support our youths in navigating these new realities. To improve financial literacy education in Singapore, I would like to suggest a two-fold approach. First, I urge MOE to take a targeted and more in-depth approach to incorporating financial literacy education in the school curriculum. Financial literacy should be taught in a way that is both relevant to the students' lives and tailored to Singapore's unique financial ecosystem. Students should not leave school without understanding the Central Provident Fund (CPF), housing loans, taxes and insurance. Financial literacy education must also constantly evolve to reflect new financial trends, such as Buy-Now-Pay-Later schemes and cryptocurrency. Second, expand partnerships and funding for financial literacy programmes. It is crucial to start financial literacy education as early as possible. A strong foundation means that Singaporeans are equipped with the financial know-how to manage money effectively, setting them up for life. That being said, I fully recognise the heavy workload that our teachers already shoulder. I am not suggesting that teachers bear this responsibility alone. We can tap on experienced external vendors to complement MOE's efforts.”
“SEN officers play a crucial role in supporting students with special needs. According to MOE, "the number of SEN officers in mainstream schools has increased from around 450 in 2017 to about 680 as of July 2024". Can the Ministry share if there is a target ideal number of SEN officers in mainstream schools and if so, what this is, and how it plans to continue enhancing the support and development of SEN officers? Enhancing Lifelong Learning”
“However, can the Ministry clarify how it ensures the collection of a representative sample, as such online channels may end up excluding less digitally-savvy groups, like our seniors. Perhaps the Ministry could consider dedicated outreaches to seniors and persons with disabilities for a broader and more inclusive engagement. Lastly, public transport may not be feasible for some persons with disabilities. To facilitate participation in education, employment and even play, can the Ministry elaborate if there are future plans to increase the availability and affordability of wheelchair transport? Improving Road Safety for Pedestrians”
“Chairman, to fulfil Singapore’s car-lite ambitions, having a world-class public transport system must be a top priority. This means making it accessible to all, including seniors, children, young parents with prams and wheelchair users, just to name a few. A safe and pleasant commuter experience helps position public transport as the mode of choice. As a frequent user of the MRT, this is why I have been asking Parliamentary Questions around this. For example, last year, I raised the need to enhance and ensure the consistent display of LCD screens, so that commuters can read the route map and be able to count the stops before their destination at all times. To reduce the risk of crowd-related collisions, I also suggested wayfinding floor graphics that are immediately visible upon exiting train cabins, guiding commuters towards elevators on MRT platforms. It is often difficult to locate the nearest lift, especially during peak hours, and on crowded platforms. Even more so when taller commuters obstruct the view of wheelchair users, disrupting their ability to navigate. This complements existing tactile guiding systems, and helps reduce directional ambiguity. I had asked about the implementation of gap fillers and ways to further reduce the height difference between the platform and train floor. This too, is in the interest of safety and independent commuting. Can the Ministry share if it has any updates on these suggestions or upcoming plans to further enhance the commuter experience? I understand that the Ministry periodically collects feedback through platforms like CrowdTaskSG. A recent example was the study titled, “User Research: Wayfinding on MRT Network” by LTA. Such studies are commendable, as user feedback is the best form of feedback.”
“Mr Chairman, the Land Transport Master Plan (LTMP) 2040 was first released by LTA in 2019. Can the Ministry provide an update on its feasibility studies for a proposed rail line in the north and northeast regions as outlined in the LTMP 2040? Growing Public Transport Ridership”
“Chairman, I brought up in last year's Budget and COS debate that more can be done for persons with disabilities in the area of housing. The EASE programme is actually open to persons with disabilities regardless of age, on a case-by-case basis. However, speaking to people on the ground, not everyone is aware they can apply. The naming of the scheme suggests that the programme is meant for seniors only. MND should make it clearer that persons with disabilities of all ages can also benefit from EASE. Alternatively, could MND consider a similar but separate scheme for persons with disabilities? Those who require home modifications should be fully informed of their options to empower independent living at home. Under such a scheme, and this is a point I made last year, MND can then widen the list of improvement items that specifically cater to persons with disabilities beyond those with mobility challenges. Same-floor Lift Access for All HDB Flats”
“Mr Speaker, we often speak about inclusion, but the real goal is making it second nature, where it no longer needs to be said, because it is simply part of who we are. Arts and sports hold a unique power to achieve this, by bringing people together in ways policies alone cannot. They create spaces where we see talent before limitation, ability before disability. As the Prime Minister said in his Budget Statement, no one should be left behind. I stand by this message wholeheartedly. But we must make this a lived reality, where dreams and aspirations are within reach for all, not just some. Imagine a world where an artist is seen for their craft, a sportsperson for their skill – and not for their disability. A world where access and opportunity are more than just ideals. That is the future we should strive for. A Singapore we can all be proud to call home. Sir, I support the Budget. [Applause.]”
“While I personally find the competitive element fun and engaging, I do wonder if it may discourage those who prefer a more recreational approach to sports or exercise. Perhaps in the next DSMP refresh, MCCY could consider engaging deeper into this area, to find more ways to integrate PwDs in mainstream schools and to introduce more pathways for recreational sports participation. Third, the end-to-end experience for PwDs to participate in sports needs to be seamless. It is encouraging to see that the DSMP is already working towards accessible facilities under Strategic Move 3. Still, we must continue paying attention to the finer details to ensure an inclusive and uniform experience. I have always appreciated that the OCBC Aquatic Centre at the Singapore Sports Hub has concession rates for PwDs. This is a clear signal that PwDs are welcome and supported there. However, there are still areas for improvement. For instance, while the Aquatic Centre does have a wheelchair accessible counter for ticket purchase, it is unfortunately always closed in my personal experience. Additionally, while other gantries allow independent access, the wider, accessible gate for wheelchair users still has to be manually operated by a staff member, creating an unnecessary barrier. These may seem like minor details, but addressing them is essential so that inclusive access does not feel like an after-thought but part of a proactive design. I fully believe that we all recognise the importance of enabling PwDs to live independently. As we continue making strides in enhancing our ActiveSG sports facilities, let us not overlook the small but important details to ensure complete accessibility. I will now conclude.”
“But this is not what the plan seeks to accomplish at all. If social inclusion through sports is a collective effort, then why not call future iterations the Inclusive Sports Masterplan? Rebranding the DSMP in this way sends a clear yet subtle message: that sports should be for everyone. It draws the attention of the general public and prompts them to consider the important role they play in fostering a truly inclusive society. Second, beyond awareness, we should take more active steps towards greater community integration, especially at a recreational level. The first two strategic themes of the DSMP are to increase accessibility and enhance awareness of disability sports and inclusive sports activities. These are great, targeted steps and I commend MCCY for actively listening to feedback and responding to engagement findings. In particular, I found Strategic Move 4 very encouraging, as we aim to have all mainstream schools offer opportunities for students to experience disability sports by 2028. While it does not directly address integrating students with disabilities in mainstream schools via sports, it really does help to tackle the issue of awareness, which is the first step in overcoming preconceived notions about persons with disabilities. Another positive initiative comes under Strategic Move 5, which is to increase the outreach of Play Inclusive, a unified sports competition where students from SPED and mainstream schools train and compete together. Though the overarching objective is awareness, I recognise it is also about integration as it enables PwDs to play sports together with the wider community. In order to qualify, unified teams have to train together in the respective sports for a minimum of eight weeks.”
“Can we explore partnerships with international disability arts groups, to allow our artists to interact with peers from around the world? By doing so, we can proudly showcase the diversity of disability performances and provide greater exposure for local artists with disabilities. Sir, I have spoken up on a few occasions about the power of sports and why it is so important. Last year, the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth (MCCY) announced the refreshed Disability Sports Master Plan (DSMP). DSMP 2024 identified three strategic themes: one, increasing accessibility to disability sports activities and programmes; two, enhancing awareness of disability sports and inclusive sports activities; and three, fulfilling high performance aspirations of persons with disabilities. While I fully support these pillars and their initiatives, I have three complementary suggestions that I hope will further amplify their impact. First, we need to get more of the population to buy into the DSMP. If you read the master plan closely, you will find that achieving social inclusion through sports is actually a recurring objective. It is not about promoting disability sports exclusively for persons with disabilities or simply raising awareness among the general public, but it hopes to use sports to integrate society and normalise inclusive activities. While the current name "Disability Sports Master Plan" is well-intended to put the spotlight on promoting disability sports at a recreational and high performance level, it risks creating the perception that this plan is only for persons with disabilities. When someone without a disability comes across the DSMP, perhaps in the news, they may not instinctively see its relevance to them.”
“One great example is the Purple Symphony, an inclusive orchestra comprising talented musicians with and without disabilities. Another organisation, ART:DIS, is a non-profit organisation that supports persons with disabilities in the arts by organising art programmes, exhibitions and performances. Such groups offer training and resources to elevate the artistic standards of artists with disabilities by offering an alternative, accessible platform to hone their craft. I believe that the next stage for truly inclusive practices is when performances by artists with disabilities are no longer showcased in isolation but ingrained in our arts culture. This means creating clear pathways for artists with disabilities to enter the mainstream. At present, persons with disabilities are a part of significant national performances, such as the National Day Parade and Singapore Youth Festival Arts Presentation. Their artworks are showcased alongside those of artists without disabilities and they perform as part of a larger collective. But the question remains: how do we make this more of a norm? I recognise that this shift is not easy. There are barriers to overcome still, both in infrastructure and in mindset. Perhaps we can take inspiration from the successful strategies we have used in organising our ethnic and cultural festivals. We have long celebrated our multi-cultural identity, hosting arts festivals that are rich in diversity, featuring both local and international cultural performances. It has become second nature. We do not even think twice about the cultural richness that these events hold. The same can be done for performances involving persons with disabilities.”
“Second, we should already recognise that persons with disabilities often have diverse needs, which require more flexibility and thoughtful planning. Not everyone with mobility challenges uses a wheelchair. Some can walk short distances, others may be able to manage a few steps. Yet, these nuances are often lost in the standard web-based ticketing experience. A potential solution could be to establish a dedicated access and ticketing hotline for persons with disabilities to make enquiries and explore specific accommodations for arts events in advance. This way, more people can be assured of a comfortable experience. The Government can take the lead by introducing such a hotline at venues it owns and operates, like the Singapore Indoor Stadium or Singapore Conference Hall. This can serve as a model for private ticketing offices, allowing them to adopt similar practices, if proven effective. Sir, an inclusive event starts before the doors even open. When persons with disabilities can secure tickets as easily as everyone else and are then welcomed by trained staff on event day, this creates a smooth experience and facilitates participation in the arts scene without hesitation. Let me move on to my second point on enhancing representation in the arts scene. Mr Speaker, we should do more to support and nurture artists with disabilities at all levels of the arts landscape. This is not just about putting more persons with disabilities on stage. It is about ensuring that the voices and perspectives of persons with disabilities are embedded into our cultural identity. We already have dedicated groups to champion arts and cultural performances by persons with disabilities.”
“For instance, local theatre companies like Wild Rice and the Singapore Repertory Theatre have taken commendable steps in providing access performances at select showings. These performances are accompanied by sign language interpretation, captions, audio descriptions and touch tours, to offer a fully inclusive experience. Another heartwarming example was the Coldplay concert in January last year that had a special zone for fans who are deaf or hard of hearing. Sign language interpreters translated the lyrics in real time, while fans used interactive vests called SubPacs, to feel the music through vibrations. These accommodations went beyond providing literal translations of the lyrics. They were about giving fans full access to the concert experience, immersing them in the rhythm, energy and soul of the music. Mr Speaker, this is the kind of inclusive action we need to see more of. There are actionable steps that we can take to understand and address the unique needs of individuals with disabilities. To this end, I have two suggestions. First, could the Government consider commissioning a comprehensive survey to understand the participation of persons with disabilities in the arts and the challenges they face? During the Budget speech, Prime Minister Wong introduced the SG Culture Pass, granting every Singaporean aged 18 and above, $100 credits to attend arts and heritage events. We need to make sure that when initiatives like this are rolled out to all Singaporeans, we do not inadvertently exclude others disproportionately. Having such a survey will allow the Government to pinpoint specific barriers encountered by persons with disabilities and it could highlight areas that are under-addressed and ensure equitable participation even in the arts scene.”
“Yet today, many still feel awkward interacting with persons with disabilities. We are still some distance away from more natural and meaningful interactions. The arts create spaces where this change can take place, where people from all walks of life come together through a shared love for music, performance and culture. Our SG Arts Plan 2023-2027 is a roadmap that guides Singapore's arts policies over a five-year period. While the plan recognises the importance of inclusivity in the arts, there is room to further refine what this means in a holistic way for persons with disabilities. We can do more to harness the arts as a force for greater inclusion in our society. To achieve this, I propose a two-pronged approach: increasing participation and enhancing representation. First, to boost participation, we need to make concerts, theatre performances and live music events more accessible. Last year, we were treated to a lineup of exciting, high-profile concerts, including Taylor Swift, Bruno Mars and Ed Sheeran. But how many of those with mobility challenges or sensory disabilities actually get to attend? Too often, the experience of booking tickets for major events can be stressful and anxiety-inducing for those with unique accommodation needs. The race of "fastest fingers first" leaves many excluded before the event begins. Accessibility means more than simply providing wheelchair spaces or one-size-fits-all solutions. It means recognising the diverse needs of individuals and adopting an end-to-end, user-centric approach. While some productions do provide accommodations, it is not yet standard across the board.”
“That is why I am happy to see "Nurturing A Caring and Inclusive Society" as a core tenet of this Budget, with meaningful initiatives for families, seniors and persons with disabilities. At its core, inclusion is not just about supporting specific groups in isolation. It is about integrating them to strengthen our social fabric and unite us as one nation. When everyone, including the most vulnerable, has real opportunities to contribute and thrive, to participate in shared spaces and to engage meaningfully with the wider community, we build a stronger Singaporean identity. In this spirit, I fully welcome the dedicated focus on "Empowering Persons with Disabilities" this year. I am also very heartened to hear the Prime Minister specifically recognising the concerns in the post-18 space and I look forward to hearing more about the initiatives that will be shared by MOE and MSF during the COS debates. Sir, last year, I spoke extensively on what inclusion or social participation means for persons with disabilities. In this debate, I hope to build on this and explore how we weave this naturally into the fabric of our society through two familiar avenues: the arts and sports. From a young age, we were taught to embrace people of different races and religions. We have internalised racial and religious harmony as a core Singaporean value, not only because we learn this in our textbooks, but because we have grown up, learnt together and played alongside friends, regardless of race or faith. We bond as Singaporeans over shared experiences, whether it is our love of food, cheering for our national team, catching up on gossip or breaking down the latest Netflix drama. Mr Speaker, where similarities meet, differences fade away.”
“I thank the Prime Minister and Minister for Finance, Mr Lawrence Wong and his team for putting together a Budget that is both balanced and sustainable. In his opening remarks, the Prime Minister reminded all of us that, "Singapore today is far stronger than we were 60 years ago." For us to enjoy an expected Budget surplus of $6.8 billion, or 0.9% of GDP in 2025, and a similar figure in 2024, especially when we are a country without natural resources is not something to take for granted. We only need to look around us, to know that what we have got is highly uncommon and worth safeguarding. While it is reasonable to question the accuracy of the Government's financial projections or debate how to best use the surplus, we, nonetheless, find ourselves in a position of strength. In his speech, the Prime Minister also framed the Budget statement in the context of the global realities at play. We live in a time of persistent geopolitical uncertainty, where war rages on and global trade rules are being re-written. Long-held principles are now being questioned or even renounced. As citizens of the world, we are left to ask ourselves: what do we hold onto? Yet, even in these times, it is reassuring to see Singapore remain steadfast in our values. There is an inherent tension between securing our social ideals and maintaining financial discipline. Mr Speaker, even as worldviews shift, Budget 2025 has carved out an important space to stay true to our ideals while upholding fiscal prudence. The Budget has never been just about government spending or financial reserves. It is equally about our social capital.”
“Hence, the law and its associated initiatives should be harnessed to realise the vision of the Enabling Masterplan 2030, not only to meet the aspirational target of 40% employment rate for persons with disabilities by 2030, but to embed inclusion into every aspect of society. Let me now conclude. In 2013, Singapore ratified the UNCRPD and we have done a lot since. Today marks a meaningful step in our ongoing effort to address the remaining gaps in our laws. But the passing of this Bill will not be of material concern for employers who are already inclusive, nor will it automatically transform every organisation into an equitable employer. It simply sets the minimum standards for fair employment practices. Real change requires much more than that. It is my hope that more employers take fairness beyond just a legal obligation. It is an opportunity to embrace the benefits of workplace diversity and above all, to do what is right. Let us continue striving for a Singapore where every individual is valued and where our workplaces reflect the best of our shared values. With that, Sir, I support the Bill.”
“These legal frameworks, while not identical, all uphold a holistic and thoughtfully applied principle of reasonableness, which safeguards the vulnerable while ensuring a judicious process. By studying how other jurisdictions have embedded their laws into practice, we can refine our approach and adapt these lessons to Singapore's unique context. Mr Speaker, we can be proud of the progress we have made for PwDs over the past decade. The Disability Trends report released by MSF last month revealed that public attitudes towards persons with disabilities were largely positive. Yet, based on the survey by the National Council for Social Service, there has also been a decrease in positive attitudes towards persons with disabilities in the workplace, from 59.6% in 2019 to 50.6% in 2023. While the reasons for this are not stated by MSF, more work needs to be done. NCSS' survey also revealed one interesting finding, which I will quote: "respondents who had contact with persons with disabilities at least twice in the past year reported higher proportions of positive public attitudes across the four disability types, compared to those who had no contact with persons with disabilities at all". This highlights the need to consistently raise awareness and promote meaningful interactions in the community. The more we live, play or work with PwDs, the more understanding and accepting we become. I agree with Minister Tan See Leng – there is no silver bullet to eradicate discrimination. Legislation alone cannot be a panacea that solves for fair and nurturing workplaces. As we debate the finer points today, we must not lose sight of the bigger picture. The WFL works in support of our broader ambitions – to build a more inclusive society, beyond just the workplace.”
“Direct discrimination was once only addressed in the TGFEP. Now, protections against direct discrimination are enshrined in law. Another example is the recently introduced Tripartite Guidelines on Flexible Work Arrangement Requests, which replaced the earlier tripartite advisory on FWAs. The same approach can be applied to reasonable accommodations in the future. While an advisory can serve to provide a starting point, there is a real risk it may not be taken seriously or is seen as optional. Therefore, it is crucial that the transition into enforceable guidelines is prompt and deliberate. As employers adapt to new practices under the advisory, the Government can study how to legislate reasonable accommodations. On the surface, defining what is "reasonable" might sound tricky, but it is not an abstract concept. Just like for indirect discrimination, other jurisdictions provide for reasonable accommodations. For instance, the Canadian Human Rights Act provides that employers and service providers have a duty to accommodate up to the point of "undue hardship", considering health, safety and cost. This is scoped not to only provide coverage for PwDs, but to cover all other prohibited grounds of discrimination, which means protected characteristics in our context. It also states that, "the Governor in Council may make regulations prescribing standards for assessing undue hardship". Similarly, Australia's Disability Discrimination Act states that an adjustment is reasonable unless making the adjustment would impose an "unjustifiable hardship" on the person. In determining whether a hardship is unjustifiable, the Disability Discrimination Act adopts a multifactorial approach by taking into account all relevant circumstances of the particular case.”
“Another 37% experienced a one-off cost with a median of US$300 or roughly S$410. Closer to home, Singapore offers grants specifically designed to support employers in creating workplace accommodations for persons with disabilities. Employers will be happy to know that if they are registered under the Open Door Programme, they can tap on the Job Redesign Grant that covers up to 90% of costs incurred. The grant, administered by SG Enable, can be used to defray the cost for the purchase of equipment, workplace modifications, redesigning of job scopes or processes and consultancy services. Fifty percent of employers who used the grant reported that workplace accommodations cost less than $1,000 on average. Between 2020 and 2022, 20 employers hiring 60 persons with disabilities benefited from the Job Redesign Grant per year on average. We need to do more to encourage higher uptake of available support. I hope that the tripartite partners can play a crucial role in raising awareness of such schemes. Third, the advisory needs to outline how the process of providing reasonable accommodations should be managed. Requesting for accommodations is not a one-sided demand. Instead, it should be a collaborative process that addresses concerns of both employees and employers. This can be clarified by providing specific examples of reasonable accommodations and what falls outside the scope of reasonableness. This balanced approach ensures that such workplace accommodations are validated and implemented in a practical and fair manner. Finally, MOM should consider specifying a timeline for transitioning the tripartite advisory into enforceable guidelines, laying the foundation for future legislation. Such transitions are not without precedent. Our very debate today is one such example.”
“Taking this stepwise approach may be a prudent way to build consensus and readiness, before moving towards strengthening our law in the near future. To ensure the advisory is effective, I would like to offer a few suggestions. First, the advisory needs to emphasise that reasonable accommodations are a necessity, not a good-to-have. It needs to address common misconceptions and clearly show that the outcome is a net positive to the employer and the employee. In the context of workplaces, reasonable accommodations are indispensable adjustments made to enable persons with disabilities to perform their job duties. The goal of reasonable accommodations is not to give anyone an unfair advantage. It is about levelling the playing field. It allows persons with disabilities to enjoy equal opportunities in the workplace. According to the US Job Accommodation Network, 85% of employers reported a direct benefit of retaining a valuable employee as a result of having made an accommodation. Other widely mentioned benefits include increased employee productivity and company morale. These points show that when employees are given the right tools and environment, they are happier and well positioned to become valuable contributors that stay for the long term. Second, the advisory should draw attention to the financial support available to allay any costs concerns. Reasonable accommodations are not meant to be overwhelming or create excessive strain on any organisation. Some employers may worry that providing accommodations would come at a heavy cost. But this fear is unfounded. The US Job Accommodation Network found that 56% of workplace accommodations for persons with disabilities came at no cost to employers – free of charge.”
“Taking reference from SG Enable and the UNCRPD, reasonable accommodations are necessary and appropriate modifications and adjustments. They are adjustments that do not impose a disproportionate or undue burden and puts persons with disabilities on equal footing with the rest of society. Many of us rarely consider the accommodations we rely on daily, like having a table to write on or a chair to sit on, because they are so integrated into our lives. Supporting PwDs is not about large-scale changes. It is about small, thoughtful considerations. Just as having a table or a computer is a basic necessity for work, PwDs also need accommodations – only that they are tailored to their specific needs to carry out their tasks effectively. For example, a wheelchair user may require a height-adjustable desk at work. An autistic employee might benefit from a relaxed dress code to reduce sensory discomfort or require clear, direct instructions to enable productive work delivery. PwDs merely want to be treated equitably, not with sympathy or pity. Sir, denying the space to provide reasonable accommodations undermines a fundamental right. Yet, the WFL does not prohibit the denial of reasonable accommodations. In place of legislation, I understand that the tripartite partners plan to release an advisory on the provision of reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities. This is expected to work in concert with the WFL. We all know an advisory is not law, but if harnessed effectively, it could still lay important groundwork. If we want employers to embrace and buy into the idea of reasonable accommodation, we must first demonstrate its necessity, share best practices and debunk the myths.”
“It is crucial that those who suffer from discrimination feel safe and empowered to report such unfortunate instances. Given this, can the Government clarify, how employees who seek help in cases of indirect discrimination will be protected against retaliation since this falls, technically, outside of the Bill's coverage. Addressing this clearly will encourage more employees to come forward without fear of reprisal, ensuring they report their concerns and finally receive the support they need. While the Government has chosen not to include protections for indirect discrimination in the Bill at this juncture, such legislation is not new. There are other jurisdictions that have legally defined indirect discrimination to protect vulnerable persons in all settings beyond just the workplace. For instance, the UK has its Equality Act. Australia makes this definition in its Disability Discrimination Act as well as in the respective discrimination Acts for age and sex. Similarly in Hong Kong, the Ordinances for each protected attribute of disability, sex, family status and race, all explicitly provide for protections against indirect discrimination. The passing of the Workplace Fairness Act is an important step in helping our workplace mature, paving the way for deeper commitments to fairness and inclusivity in the future. In parallel, I urge the Government to examine how other jurisdictions have defined and implemented such protections against indirect discrimination and adapt these learnings to strengthen our local approach in future amendments to our WFL. Mr Speaker, discrimination can take many forms. One such form is the denial of reasonable accommodations. This is recognised in some jurisdictions as a discriminatory practice.”
“Employers and employees in Singapore who wish to understand the principles of fair employment practices can refer to TAFEP's TGFEP. The guidelines outline the dos and do nots for ensuring fairness across all stages of employment. However, the current recommendations and examples that accompany them deal only with direct discrimination. Since protections against direct discrimination will now be elevated through legislation, the issue of indirect discrimination remains insufficiently addressed in existing guidelines. Given this, can MOM consider, in collaboration with the tripartite partners, updating and improving the guidelines to incorporate explicit messaging that indirect discrimination is not to be tolerated? These guidelines should include clear examples of indirect discrimination. By helping employers and employees better understand the concept, the TGFEP can serve as a valuable tool for providing practical guidance for employers and employees to navigate such situations. This may be especially helpful for employers with fewer than 25 employees who are currently not in the scope of this Bill. Most who experienced discrimination at work often do not report to official channels. According to MOM's Fair Employment Practices Report, in 2023 only 29.3% of employees who encountered discrimination at work sought help. Perhaps, they believed that their concerns will not be taken seriously, or worse, that they will face negative consequences. Under section 28 of the Bill, "prohibition against retaliation", only prohibits retaliation for anything done under or by reference to the proposed Act. It is unclear if these protections extend to those who seek help from TAFEP or MOM for indirect discrimination.”
“Indirect discrimination occurs when a seemingly neutral policy disproportionately puts persons with a particular protected characteristic at a disadvantage, even if the adverse outcome is unintended. For example, sharing key information solely through verbal communication would exclude employees who are deaf or hard of hearing and pose challenges for autistic individuals who need direct and explicit messaging. An employer might believe they are being fair by giving instructions to all employees in the same way. They may think there is no discriminatory practice. But this approach disadvantages those of us who genuinely require tailored adjustments to thrive. When accessibility is disregarded, opportunities at the workplace gradually narrow. Performance is unfairly evaluated at year-end. Promotions or career advancements are stifled. The result is an adverse employment outcome that unjustly penalises someone for circumstances beyond their control. Sir, unlike direct discrimination, indirect discrimination is often difficult to prove or perhaps not as easily understood. It may be subtle and less obvious, but it is a real issue that needs to be tackled. Policies or common practices are rarely designed with sufficient thought for including minorities or the disadvantaged. This makes indirect discrimination more pervasive and harder to address, especially when biases are unconscious. Without sufficient intervention, it leaves disadvantaged minorities even more vulnerable. The WFL does not provide for indirect discrimination. In the absence of legislation, those who believe they have suffered from indirect discrimination have little recourse besides seeking help from TAFEP.”
“Mr Speaker, today Parliament debates the Workplace Fairness Legislation, a landmark Bill that sends a clear message: discrimination has no place in our work environment. Discrimination, in all its forms, must be eradicated if we are to build a truly inclusive community. As the saying goes, "the true measure of any society can be found in how it treats its most vulnerable members". This Bill reflects that principle, representing a step forward in the right direction and I commend the Government for reaffirming our pledge to fairness and dignity. The proposed Act defines 11 protected characteristics, taking a pragmatic approach to cover 95% of discrimination based on complaints to TAFEP and MOM. Among them, disability has been designated as one protected characteristic, bringing much-needed attention to a vulnerable minority. Before today, there has not been any legislation that specifically addresses discrimination against persons with disabilities in the workplace, making this an exciting milestone for many in the community. My speech will focus on what this legislation means for those with disabilities in the employment landscape. Under section 17 of the Bill, it is discrimination for an employer to make an employment decision that adversely affects an individual if at least one of the grounds for the decision includes the individual's protected characteristic. This means that direct discrimination is expressly prohibited. This is a good thing. We cannot allow fair employment opportunities to be denied on the basis of one's disability. However, discrimination may not always be direct. An individual may also face indirect discrimination.”
“I thank the Senior Parliamentary Secretary for the reply. I just want to say that as a commuter and a wheelchair user, it is not sufficient because it is quite important to be able to know exactly where you are at all times. I think the rotating information, sometimes you may miss out exactly where you are on the station and let us say you were not paying attention, for example, during the commute, you want to know in one look, where you are. So, at the moment, I think, for instance, the North East Line does not exactly show a commuter where you are approaching. And then, the East-West Line tends to show the station name quite clearly, I think in the rotating information, but not in the context of where you are on the route map. So, let us say if you were dozing off on the train and you look up, it is not immediately clear and you may miss a stop. And it is even more so if you have mobility challenges and I just wanted to raise that. I would be happy to take this also offline to discuss how we can enhance this.”
“I thank the Senior Parliamentary Secretary for the response. I ask these Parliamentary Questions as I frequently commute via the MRT. As a commuter, it is not always easy to identify where exactly I am on the MRT route, especially when the train is crowded and even more so for a wheelchair user, where the eye-level is a lot lower. So, the LCD display, as you pointed out, is not consistent across the train lines. In my opinion, ensuring better user interface should be a priority and is potentially not too complex an issue to solve. So, I would just like to ask the Senior Parliamentary Secretary if there are any challenges to make this information more consistently clear across the train lines and whether or not we can share a more concrete timeline of when to expect them.”
“For Minister Edwin Tong, it has been a long day so I apologise if I failed to hear this in his response. I do understand that the factors were being looked at cumulatively. But referencing my speech, can the Minister clarify whether the lack of clear binding provisions or structural protection around Income's social mission alone is sufficient reason to merit the blocking of this deal?”
“I would therefore like to ask the Minister, were it not for the issue of capital extraction, would the Government still see fit to accept the assurances of Income and NE regarding its social mission in good faith? Or would the lack of clear, binding provisions or structural protections alone be sufficient grounds to merit the blocking of this deal? I hope the Minister could address this point with clarity and transparency, so that Singaporeans can better understand and fully appreciate the deliberations of the Government, especially when it concerns national assets to which Singaporeans have deep emotional ties. This is important in the context of this Bill, as the amendment introducing section 33(a) into the Insurance Act will now require the Minister's approval before the MAS may approve an application by a person to obtain effective control of or become a substantial shareholder of certain licensed insurers. Sir, while the passing of this Bill runs the risk of appearing rushed, it will nonetheless enable the Government to uphold public interest in these pressing circumstances. Therefore, notwithstanding my clarification above, I support the Bill.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, let me first declare that I work in a financial institution. Two months ago, at least in the eyes of the public, the proposed transaction at the centre of our debate today was defended quite robustly in Parliament. Income's track record and the many assurances from Income and NE were repeatedly referenced, to justify that Income's social mission will continue to be fulfilled, even after a foreign company acquires a majority stake in it. On Monday, it therefore came as a surprise to many Singaporeans that the Government had intervened to stop the deal. I note in MCCY's assessment, as articulated by Minister Edwin Tong, that one of the two key reasons why the deal was not approved in its current form, was because there were, and I quote, "no clear binding provisions or structural protections in the deal to ensure that Income's social mission will be discharged." It is now clear that the promises around Income's commitment to maintaining its social mission are not legally binding. In the absence of written or legally binding provisions, one cannot draw sufficient comfort or be reasonably confident that such assurances can be upheld, especially when the ownership structure becomes markedly different post-acquisition, and I agree. The other key reason why the proposed transaction was blocked, pertains to the proposed capital extraction plan, a substantial amount of about S$1.85 billion over three years. To MCCY, this proposal materially changes the complexion of this transaction since the original intentions of the deal on the grounds of capital adequacy can no longer be defended. And I agree with this judgement as well.”
“Whether you choose to turn therapy into a competitive career is completely up to you. If you have the interest and desire to challenge yourself in high performance sports, organisations like SDSC have the pathways to make your dreams possible. If not, taking part in sports simply to stay fit, make friends, and enjoy yourself is just as valuable. Mr Speaker, a few days ago, I went for a swim, my usual routine on most weekends. Despite a fully-equipped and accessible ActiveSG Sports Centre, there was not a single wheelchair user in sight. It is my dream that one day, every sports facility will be bustling with activity, where everyone of every ability is included. In closing, I wish to once again, extend my warmest congratulations to our Team Singapore athletes for their outstanding achievements. By carrying the torch and blazing the way forward, you set an inspiring example for us all to reach for greater heights, and shape the Singapore we want to live in. Sir, I fully support the Motion.”
“According to focus group discussions with social agencies and SPED schools conducted in the lead-up to the review of the 2016 DSMP, around 70% of non-participants said they were not interested in sports. This statistic speaks volumes. Building more accessible infrastructure alone is not enough. There is an urgent need to do much better in how we raise awareness and promote the benefits of sports. As we look forward to the update of the DSMP – and I thank Minister Edwin Tong for earlier giving us a glimpse of what to expect – it is critical to ensure that persons with disabilities and their caregivers fully embrace all that sports can offer. Second, everyday Singaporeans have a part to play too. When you see someone who looks different from you, do you stare, or do you recognise them as part of your larger community? Simple gestures, like a warm smile, offering a seat, and other acts of kindness can go a long way. If each of us makes an effort to foster inclusive and accepting environments, more persons with disabilities will feel comfortable to show up, participate, and thrive in our shared spaces. And third, all of this will remain an academic discussion if persons with disabilities and their caregivers do not, themselves, take the first step to participate. Change often begins with small actions. For those unsure of where to begin, setting personal goals can be a great way to get yourself motivated. These goals do not need to be grand or lofty. Sometimes, achieving the goal of being able to get out of bed independently, can be a rewarding and significant milestone. And from there, who knows where that progress will take you? Our equestrians who are with us today – Laurentia, Hilary and Gemma – all started riding as a form of therapy. And look at where they are today.”
“It is an inclusive force that can unite a nation. Our national athletes show us what is possible if you take sporting talent and ambition to the next level. But what about the rest of us, those who play sports socially, recreationally, or just to stay fit? What about those of us with disabilities? Where do we fit in? Sports participation has countless benefits. Beyond improving one’s physical health, participating in sports also builds discipline and boosts self-confidence. It can reduce stress, prevent cognitive decline and combat depression. In short, sports participation materially improves our quality of life. This is even more so for persons with disabilities, as engaging in sports can enhance mobility, foster independence and build resilience. Inclusive sports participation is therefore essential to ensure that persons with disabilities feel welcomed, so that they too can reap the benefits of sports. To make sports truly inclusive, it will take a whole-of-society approach. The Government, everyday Singaporeans, caregivers and persons with disabilities. All three groups have a crucial role to play. First, it is vital for the Government to keep inclusive programming at the heart of policy-making, to encourage more to participate. For example, in mainstream schools, are we doing enough to include children with disabilities in physical education classes? Unlike their peers in SPED schools, students with disabilities in mainstream settings do not have a structured approach to sports participation. We need to do more to ensure that persons with disabilities are exposed to sports and its benefits at a young age, to give them a higher shot of sustaining sports participation later in life.”
“As for Pin Xiu, welcome back, you are no stranger to this House and to sporting glory. You brought home not one, but two gold medals from Paris. I remember watching the 100m backstroke event and was incredulous when I realised that Pin Xiu won the event by a margin of 0.06 seconds. Even the commentators could not tell who won, in real-time. Pin Xiu, it must have been an exhilarating race for you. To perform at such elite standards, with seven golds and one silver across five Paralympic Games, is undeniable proof of your resolve and sheer willpower. In my younger days, I took part in amateur swimming competitions run by the Singapore Disability Sports Council (SDSC). In the pool, I imagined representing and winning a medal for Singapore at the Paralympics. As you can see, that remains a dream I had not fulfilled. I chose the boring path. Thank you, Pin Xiu and Jeralyn for showing us, showing me, that dreams can come true, if you have the courage and the will to pursue it. While we applaud our medal winners, let us not forget all our Team Singapore athletes who competed at the highest level. We see your sacrifices, your grit and your unwavering dedication to representing our nation with pride. You have given your all, and your pursuit of excellence is something we all deeply admire and respect. I hope you do not forget to celebrate as well, for you have truly earned it. To those who supported our athletes – family and friends, performance coaches, sports scientists, psychologists, doctors and many more – your role is just as vital. We recognise you too, for your contributions behind the scenes have been crucial in unlocking the potential of our sporting champions. Mr Speaker, sport has that unique power to bring people of all walks of life together.”
“Today, we celebrate the successes of our national athletes, in particular Ms Jeralyn Tan, Mr Maximilian Maeder and Ms Yip Pin Xiu, who have brought immense honour to Singapore on the world stage. To Jeralyn, Max, and Pin Xiu: your dedication, resilience, and sporting excellence were on full display in Paris. You have inspired all of us who were rooting for you at home. Thank you for flying the Singapore flag high and making us proud. Before the Paris Games, “kitefoiling” was not a term that most Singaporeans have even heard of. Yet, after Max brought home the Olympic bronze, we have seen couch experts springing up all over the island, eager to discuss this exciting sport they have always known and loved. Max may seem like an overnight success, but this cannot be further from the truth. It was years in the making. His well-documented story tells of a boy who started honing his skills and competing at the young age of 11. At 18, Max is already a decorated athlete and a household name. Max, you deserve all the flowers and we wish you many more fantastic years ahead. Over to our medal-winning Paralympians. Pin Xiu and Jeralyn, I extend my heartfelt congratulations to you, on your remarkable triumph of the human spirit. In September, Jeralyn made history by claiming Singapore’s first Paralympics medal in boccia, in her Paralympic debut, no less. But many may not know, just two months before that, Jeralyn had to endure a heartbreaking quarter final elimination from the World Boccia Cup in Portugal. While others may have crumbled under a disappointment of this scale, Jeralyn demonstrated her never-say-die attitude and has now etched her name in the history books. Her strength in the face of adversity is a testament to her character and this must not go unrecognised.”
“I thank Minister Chee Hong Tat for the Ministerial Statement. I have two supplementary questions and the Minister has touched on the first one in his response to Ms Hany Soh. First, train disruptions are often a chaotic and confusing experience for commuters. I had first-hand experiences in the past. Persons with disabilities (PWDs) and the elderly are particularly vulnerable and in need of help, as they may not know who to turn to in unfamiliar situations. Given this, may I ask the Minister to consider additional training for ground staff to better equip themselves to identify and proactively offer support to our more vulnerable commuters? Second, some commuters were unaware of the train faults until they arrived at the MRT stations. For PWDs and seniors who meticulously plan their commute, this can be quite disruptive. In line of this, will the Government consider expanding the suite of communication channels available to ensure that as many vulnerable persons and their caregivers as possible are promptly notified when train breakdowns occur?”
“The proposed Bill aims to close the gap between platform workers and their counterparts in a traditional workplace. As we roll out the new measures, I hope that this is just the start of broader efforts to scale up protections and uplift more platform workers. Sir, I support the Bill.”
“I am heartened to know that platform workers will be supported in their retirement planning and in having workplace injury compensation. Under the proposed Bill, "platform service" means a service specified in the First Schedule that is provided through a platform, digital or otherwise, by a platform operator exercising management control in respect of the provision of that service by platform workers. The meanings of platform service, platform operator and platform worker are drafted broadly enough to potentially apply to a wide range of services, such as caregiving services and cleaning services. However, based on the First Schedule, the two platform services covered in the Bill are limited to delivery service and ride-hail service for now. There are other platform workers who need to be safeguarded. As an example, I would like to call particular attention to locum nurses, especially those who find work through caregiving platforms. Locum nurses would fall within the definition of platform workers, as they are similarly subject to the management control of platform operators. They help plug the gap of providing home nursing services, especially with our ageing population. All providers of caregiving services deserve to be recognised; so do other platform workers who provide services that keep us all going. They should be entitled to having their rights, protections and representation provided for. If the Government is considering expanding the scope of the Act in future to provide for more platform workers, it would be helpful to understand the timeline for such amendments. Mr Speaker, I am glad that we are taking an active step towards looking after the under-served in our workforce.”
“In 2023 alone, there were more than 200 reported cases of abuse against taxi and private-hire drivers. Ride-hail drivers have to maintain a minimum overall rating to keep their account and be eligible for incentives and bonuses. This is essential for their livelihood. It makes them less likely to retaliate or defend themselves when facing verbal abuse, for fear of poor reviews or complaints. Women drivers are also vulnerable to sexual harassment from passengers. Yet, platform workers are not protected against harassment under the proposed Bill. They have no recourse. In comparison, some workers in other industries have protections in place. Security officers, for example, are protected from assault and harassment under the Private Security Industry Act. Such protections being legislated sends a strong signal that harassment will not be tolerated. Given that harassment is a real risk in platform work, will the Government consider including protections from harassment in a future iteration of the Act? Platform workers deserve to feel safe and have sufficient recourse in the event of harassment. In the healthcare sector, the Tripartite Framework for the Prevention of Abuse and Harassment in Healthcare was launched last December. The framework sets out, I quote, "a standardised, zero-tolerance policy against all forms of abuse and harassment towards healthcare workers". If not through legislation, I hope that the Government could at least consider modifying and applying such a framework to platform workers too. In doing so, platform operators and platform work associations can collaborate to improve reporting and prevent situations that lead to abuse and harassment. Let me now briefly touch on the scope of this Bill before I conclude.”