Sharael Taha
Singapore
“L, link regional ecosystems. O, we orchestrate with AI and frontier technologies. And W, we win by creating greater economic value, better jobs and better lives for Singaporeans. For the past 60 years, Singapore mastered the movement of ships. Then we mastered the movement of aircraft. Today, we are mastering the movement of data.”
“This is a test of our social compact, a compact that must now be renewed for a new era where businesses commit to not just profits but to people, where workers commit to not just jobs, but to lifelong growth, and where the Government continues to stand with both, ensuring that no one is left behind.”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I would like to thank Minister Tan for sharing the dual fuel nature of our power plants. My supplementary question is how quick is this switching? Can it manage the volatility, especially this unprecedented volatility? And do we need to re-optimise our power plants to manage our energy generation resilience?”
“Thank you, Chairman. Chairman, the Rail Reliability Taskforce has set out clear recommendations – accelerate renewal of ageing core systems, including train signalling and traction power, strengthen backup and resilience measures, improve asset management and spare part planning, deepen workforce capabilities and enhance commuter communic…”
“Thank you, Chairman. I thank the Minister and the political office holders for their comprehensive response. I have a few supplementary questions. I believe the Minister did not get an opportunity to address my cut on the role of NAIC. What precisely is its role?”
“Okay. Mr Chairman, I would like to take this opportunity to thank Minister Josephine Teo, Senior Minister of State Tan Kiat How, Minister of State Rahayu, Minister of State Jasmin Lau and the Permanent Secretary of MDDI, and the whole MDDI team for the responses and the great work that they do.”
The complete record
Every one of 500 lines we hold for Sharael Taha, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 4 of 10.
“Thank you, Mdm Deputy Speaker. Just to answer the query that Member Assoc Prof Jamus Lim asked. If he would have heard my speech, I mentioned that while it may increase short-term revenue, MNEs could adjust strategies by relocating operations of headquarters, limiting the sustainable gains – something which Minister Indranee Rajah has also mentioned. So, yes, it may increase the short-term revenue. However, because we do not know how MNEs will react to it, there may be a possibility that it is not a sustainable gain. The point I was truly making was about how we approach this situation when investments are such a critical thing to the survival of Singapore. The point I was making was not to approach this in a simplistic manner and underplay the effect of it and overestimate the benefits of it, to the extent of banking it in such that the increase in corporate taxes alone because of BEPS 2.0 can by itself cover the revenue that is generated by the increase in GST. So, it is about how do we approach this situation and about us being more cautious about it, and not count the chickens before the eggs hatch.”
“Mdm Deputy Speaker, BEPS 2.0 seeks to close gaps in international tax rules, ensuring MNEs pay their fair share, particularly where they generate revenue. Pillar One reallocates taxing rights to market jurisdictions, posing a challenge for Singapore given our small domestic market. Pillar Two establishes a 15% minimum effective tax rate for MNEs. In my speech, I will address three key points: firstly, the unintended consequences of implementing DTT and income inclusion rule under BEPS 2.0 Pillar Two; secondly, clarifications on the RIC; and thirdly, the timing of this implementation. Mdm Deputy Speaker, investments are essential to Singapore's economic growth, job creation and long-term stability. Investments inject capital, create jobs and nurture local talent. They foster competitiveness, innovation and technology transfers through global partnerships. To stay relevant, we must secure the right investments that refresh industries, attract expertise and adopt emerging technologies and shape our future economy. Investments across diverse sectors, such as the digital services and green technologies, strengthens resilience against economic shocks. The investments reinforce our role as a global hub and aligned with environmental plans, preparing Singapore for future challenges.”
“Mr Speaker, I would like to thank the Minister for his clarification. It is very much heartening to know that our students from lower-income families have the opportunity to also apply for DSA. In fact, 6% of the students come from FAS. But that being said, a few supplementary questions. The students from the more affluent families have better access to resources and have been taking up extracurricular activities like private coaching or even training for DSA interviews, while our students from the lower-income families do not have access to such coaching to enhance their capabilities through this expensive training. So, can the Ministry consider providing places in DSA for students from specifically lower-income families so that they have the opportunity to also take part in DSA and also expand their horizon in this space? In my second supplementary question, some school teams have a significant number of players from DSA, which then limits the opportunities for the late bloomers to come into the team and be part of the sports or the cultural activity. Can the Ministry consider, as the Minister mentioned about providing accessibility, limiting the percentage of team members in the sport or cultural activity taken in via DSA to a certain percentage so that the late bloomers have an opportunity to be part of it also?”
“Mr Speaker, as mentioned by the Minister just now about the virality of such videos, we have seen in the recent bullying case, the videos have made their rounds and continue to be made available. These videos may cause further embarrassment to the victims of the bullying. In fact, in the past one week, another video of students engaging in public displays of affection has come up. So, is there any possibility that the Ministry can work together with the Ministry of Digital Development and Information (MDDI) to get social media platforms to remove such videos, so that we remove the embarrassment for these students?”
“With platform workers using different modes of transport such as cycling or driving a car, how will the different mode of expenses be considered? Third is on the Platform Worker CPF Transition Support (PCTS). Will the PCTS be based on gross or net income? Will it be given annually or monthly? Fourth is on Work Injury Compensation. How will this be provided if the platform worker's vehicle is found to be modified? Finally, and most importantly, is salary and career progression for our platform workers. While this Bill deals with important safeguards, it does not address the issues of wage stagnation or career progression for platform workers. For most platform workers, their salaries will not increase unless they work longer in a day or if the platform operators raise their prices. In fact, their salaries will most likely decline as they grow older or need more time to look after their families. This is before the inflation rate is considered. In addition, when the assistance from PCTS ends in 2029, platform workers have to bear the full cost of CPF contributions, thus reducing their take-home pay. Mr Speaker, there are many job opportunities in Singapore especially in the growth industries which has opportunities for career advancement. How can we give our platform workers the opportunity to switch to other industries, if they want to try out new careers? (In English): Mr Speaker, Sir, in conclusion, this Bill is an important step towards protecting workers, ensuring their financial security and rebalancing the needs of all stakeholders. However, several areas require clarifications to ensure a smooth implementation. Notwithstanding the clarifications above, I stand in support of the Bill.”
“Unfortunately, his insurance was limited to only third-party fire and theft, which meant that he could not receive any compensation for his injuries or any damage to his vehicle. Today, Mr T is still on hospitalisation leave and is unable to work, lost his source of income, has several follow-up medical appointments and the worst thing is that he must bear his own medical bills and vehicle repair costs. Another story that I wish to share is about another one of my Pasir Ris residents, a husband in his 30s who has three school-going children. Although both husband and wife have been platform workers for five years, they still live in a rental flat because they do not have sufficient CPF or cash savings to make the downpayment for their own house, let alone think about retirement. According to a DBS study in 2023, the expense-to-income ratio for platform workers has risen to 112%, meaning they spend more than what they earn. Without a fair wage structure, our platform workers will continue to face financial difficulties for their housing and retirement. Therefore, this Bill is the best way to provide our platform workers with some form of financial protection, covering work injury, housing and retirement adequacy. At the same time, it ensures that platform operators can continue to thrive, preserve jobs for workers and provide services for consumers. Although I support this Bill, I would like to seek some clarifications. First is on the definition of platform operators. How will companies determine whether they are platform operators? Will MOM provide any guidance on this? Second is on CPF contributions. How will CPF contributions be calculated for platform workers? Will it be based on gross income or net income?”
“While this Bill addresses important protections for our platform workers, it does not tackle wage stagnation or career progression for our platform workers. With over 70,000 platform workers in Singapore, how can we ensure their wages keep pace with inflation and rising costs? Comparatively, the Police Force has only 15,000 full-time officers, and the number of teachers of 30,000 is less than half that of platform workers. So, this is a sizeable chunk of our workforce. Other freelancers often see wage growth with experience, but platform workers are "price takers" with little control over their earnings. For many platform workers, their current wage could represent their wage ceiling. Unless they work longer hours or platform operators raise the prices, wages will stagnate and even decrease as workers age or seek better work-life balance. With inflation, real wages will quickly decline over time. Additionally, when PCTS ends in 2029, platform workers will bear the full cost of CPF contributions, further reducing their take-home pay. In a tight labour market like ours in Singapore, we need to consider how to create opportunities for our platform workers to transition into other industries or roles if they wish to do so. Can we also provide more training support for platform workers to explore opportunities in other growth industries if they wish to do so? Mr Speaker, in Malay, please. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Allow me to share the story of a family from my ward, Pasir Ris East. Recently, I met Mr T, a father of four school-going children. A month ago, when Mr T was doing deliveries, he was hit by a vehicle in a hit-and-run incident. He suffered serious injuries and was hospitalised for two weeks.”
“I also seek clarification on whether Workfare Income Supplement (WIS) eligibility and payouts will be based on gross or net income for our platform workers. Will part-time platform workers be eligible for CPF contributions, PCTS and WIS, too? One worker in Pasir Ris raised a valid concern about his employer discovering additional CPF contributions and he was worried his employer will suspend him for moonlighting, even though he simply wanted to supplement his income. These workers need assurance and some guidelines on this matter. Fourthly, on the issue of work injury compensation, given that the platform operator is not responsible for the choice of transportation of the platform workers, what happens if a platform worker's vehicle is found to be faulty or illegally modified? While motor vehicles undergo annual inspections, the situation is less clear for personal mobility devices and bicycles. Minor modifications, such as installing brackets or baskets to carry loads, which would increase the weight of personal mobility devices above 20 kilogrammes, should not disqualify workers from compensation. On duty of care, both platform operators and workers share responsibility for safety. Should platform operators be required to monitor workers' behaviour, such as unsafe driving, or insist on proper insurance coverage? In Mr T’s case, I was surprised that Mr T only had limited third-party insurance covering only third-party fire and theft. His limited third-party insurance was deemed acceptable by the platform operator, for someone that spends hours on the road. This raises questions about the adequacy of such insurance and the operator's duty to ensure its associates are sufficiently covered under insurance.”
“Mr Speaker, let me elaborate further on the definition of platform operators. I support the Bill's focus on ride-hailing and delivery services as these workers are more akin to employees than self-employed individuals. However, more clarity is needed on how companies will determine whether they fall under the definition of platform operators. Additionally, we must be proactive in identifying industries where similar power imbalances may emerge and take steps to protect the workers in those sectors. Secondly, let me touch on CPF and the retirement support mechanisms. I recently spoke to Mr Toh Kian Seng, a 62-year-old platform worker, who welcomed mandatory CPF contributions, recognising the long-term benefits for retirement despite the short-term reduction in take-home pay. However, younger workers may not share this perspective he said, as they may at times prioritise short-term earnings over long-term savings. Therefore, we must ensure a smooth transition to mandatory CPF contributions, with adequate support mechanisms in place. How will CPF contributions be calculated? Will it be based on gross or net earnings? How will differing expenses for operating various vehicles, such as bicycles, motorbikes and cars, be factored into the calculations? PCTS is a crucial mechanism to support platform workers during the transition for CPF contributions. With the income cap for PCTS raised to $3,000, will the support be based on gross or net income? The platform workers need cash to support their families’ monthly expenses. I urge the Ministry to provide this support on a monthly basis to help workers manage their monthly expenses.”
“His limited insurance coverage left him without compensation for his injuries or damage to his bike. Now on hospitalisation leave, he has lost his income and faces medical and repair bills. This situation reflects the reality for many of our platform workers, who lack proper recourse for injury compensation despite their vital role in keeping the gig economy running. This Bill seeks to address such vulnerabilities. Beyond injury compensation, platform workers often struggle with retirement and housing adequacy. One resident in Pasir Ris, a father of three in his 30s, lives in a rental flat because he lacks sufficient CPF savings to afford a home. A 2023 DBS study found that platform workers' expense-to-income ratio has risen to 112%, meaning they are spending more than they earn. Without a fair wage structure, many workers face financial insecurity, especially regarding housing and retirement. This Bill aims to provide long-term security for platform workers. Mr Speaker, while I support the Bill, I have several clarifications. Firstly, on the definition of platform operators, how will companies assess if they are platform operators? Will MOM provide guidance on this? Secondly, on CPF contributions, how will CPF contributions be computed for our platform workers? Will it be based on gross earnings or net earnings? With platform workers using different modes of transport, how will expenses be factored in? Thirdly, on PCTS, will it support be based on gross or net income? Will it be disbursed annually, daily or monthly? Fourthly, on work injury compensation, how will this apply if the platform worker's vehicle is found to be faulty or modified? Lastly, and most importantly, wage and career progression for our platform workers.”
“Mr Speaker, today, we discuss a landmark Bill, the Platform Workers Bill, which creates a new legal framework and amends laws, such as WICA, WSH Act, CPF Act and Industrial Relations Act. This Bill represents extensive discussions and aims to provide platform workers with financial protection covering work injuries, housing and retirement adequacy. At the same time, it ensures platform operators can continue to thrive, preserving jobs for workers and services for consumers. The Bill is a result of Singapore's unique tripartite model, involving cooperation among the Ministry, unions representing workers and businesses. Hence, I want to extend my gratitude to everyone who has worked tirelessly on this Bill – our brothers and sisters from our NTUC unions representing the workers, many of them here today, spending hours with us, the workers, the team at the Ministries, the businesses and our team from the PAP who have been holding many discussions with our platform workers, including in Pasir Ris-Punggol, where we, too, held discussions with our platform workers. This Bill reflects what we can achieve by working together and our values of protecting our workers. Mr Speaker, the gig economy has expanded rapidly over the past few years, with the number of platform workers in Singapore growing from 70,500 in 2020 to 88,400 in 2022, driven by technology and the COVID-19 pandemic. However, this growth also highlights the disparity in power between platform workers and platform operators. While this imbalance may not be malicious, we need to rebalance the dynamics to ensure fairness for all parties. Mr Speaker, I want to share the story of Mr T from Pasir Ris East, a father of four who was involved in a hit-and-run accident while on a delivery job just a month ago.”
“Notwithstanding the clarifications above, I stand in support of the Bill.”
“It would be sufficient for the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the money launderer knew or had reasonable grounds to believe that they were dealing with criminal proceeds. This is a welcomed change as it enables the prosecution of money mules in cases where money is laundered through bank accounts and intermediaries in foreign jurisdictions before entering Singapore. However, I have a few concerns. How will we address situations where money launderers use innocent, unaware victims within Singapore to deceive and mislead investigators? How can we ensure adequate protection for these innocent victims? I have encountered cases where the bank accounts of suspected mules were frozen for months, only to be cleared of any wrongdoings. In some instances, their accounts remain frozen for over three months, leaving them without access to their funds. How can we better protect innocent victims in such scenarios? Secondly, in Part 3 of the amendment to the Criminal Procedure Code, clauses 14 to 17 allow for the sale of seized or restrained properties. I have a few questions regarding this. What is the threshold for the depreciation in value of the properties for the Court to order their sale? In cases where the seized properties are vehicles, does this then imply that the vehicles should be sold off as soon as possible to recover the maximum value? Mr Speaker, the amendments in the Bill are crucial. They aim to enhance the ability of our law enforcement agencies to pursue and prosecute money laundering offences. However, we must also ensure that the amendments to the Bill are implemented effectively and justly, safeguarding the interests of innocent parties while enhancing our anti money laundering efforts.”
“Mr Speaker, the recent $3 billion money laundering case has illuminated the clandestine activities and loopholes that money launderers exploit as well as their intricate cross-border operations. I would not dwell into the specifics of the particular case, but suffice to say, with billions of dollars involved, many are questioning how this could happen in Singapore, what measures can be taken to prevent a recurrence and whether our current safeguards are adequate. I am glad that this Bill, amongst many others, would strengthen our stance on anti money laundering. On the one hand, the arrest of the individuals involved in these money laundering activities, despite their complex cross-border operations, instils confidence in the capabilities of our Police Force to handle such intricate cases. On the other hand, it underscores the need for more robust measures to prevent money laundering crimes and to empower our law enforcement agencies to seek justice more effectively when a crime has been committed. Hence, the proposed amendments to the Bill are crucial. They aim to enhance the ability of our law enforcement agencies to pursue and prosecute money laundering offences and to clarify and improve our processes for dealing with seized or restrained properties linked to suspected criminal activities. These steps are vital for strengthening our anti money laundering efforts. While I stand in support of the Bill, I have a few clarifications for the Minister. Firstly, in Part 2 of the amendment to section 56 of the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes Act, Clause 10 states that the prosecution does not need to show a direct link between the criminal conduct and the monies allegedly laundered in Singapore.”
“It aims not only to protect our most critical systems, but also to secure a wider spectrum of digital infrastructure and services. Notwithstanding the clarifications above, I stand in support of the Bill.”
“What type of incidents must be reported and what constitutes sufficient severity? If a breach occurs in a system used by multiple customers, including CIIs, such as a cloud-based ERP system used by a CII like SAP S/4HANA, does the provider need to report breaches for instances outside of Singapore? And considering the complex dynamics and varying bargaining powers between computer vendors and CIIs, can we ensure adequate compliance? Which brings me to my second point. The broadened reporting obligations could also impose a substantial compliance burden on CIIs, STCCs and ESCIs. The potential for increased costs and the challenge of securing legally-binding commitment from powerful computer vendors must be addressed. How can we strike a balance that ensures robust cybersecurity without overwhelming businesses with regulatory demands? On my third point, given that these amendments are made to allow CSA to better secure Singapore's most critical systems in light of recent technological advancements, what is the Ministry's principal approach on the use of machine learning, deep learning and generative AI for CII owners? It is not unthinkable that, given the large amounts of data generated and consumed by CII owners, CII owners may have already begun to explore the use of machine learning and deep learning to optimise their processes. How do we ensure that this does not create or open up a potential cybersecurity threat for CIIs? In conclusion, as the digital environment continues to evolve, the need to fortify our cybersecurity measures become increasingly critical. This Bill is a step forward towards safeguarding Singapore's cyberspace by updating our legal framework to address contemporary challenges.”
“Lastly, the Bill seeks to provide wider cybersecurity assurance for Singapore's critical systems and important non-CII systems through the introduction of designating temporary systems as STCC in Part (3)(b) and designating entities as ESCI in Part (3)(c). These amendments, Mr Speaker, are all vital in a landscape where cyber threats increasingly exploit the interconnected nature of digital systems and the supply chain. They also address the shift towards cloud computing, where many services are moving away from traditional on-premise models. The Bill enables CSA to extend its protective measures beyond CIIs, encompassing a wider array of systems and entities under the broader umbrella of the Cybersecurity Act. While I support this Bill, I seek clarifications on several points, mainly focusing on: one, the challenges to its implementation; two, the balance between security enhancements and the compliance burden on businesses; three, how do we manage other technologies that could pose an opportunity and also an equivalent cyber threat, such as the use of deep learning, machine learning and AI within CIIs? Allow me to elaborate on my first point on challenges to implementation. By expanding the ambit of the Cybersecurity Act from just on-premise CII to CII and systems under the control of suppliers, essential services on cloud – even when it is offshore – and also to include STCC and ESCI, the scope of work for CSA will increase multiple-fold. Will CSA be adequately resourced to manage and implement this, given that a lot of the work requires detailed discussions and working arrangements together with the CIIs? The requirements for suppliers to report cybersecurity incidents also raise several questions.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, since its inception in 1993, the Computer Misuse and Cybersecurity Act has undergone several crucial revisions to strengthen our national cybersecurity framework. Notably, in 2013, the Act was first amended to address the emerging cybersecurity concerns. Further enhancements in 2018 introduced the concept of CII, empowering the Commissioner of Cybersecurity with extensive authority to combat and manage cyber threats. The digital landscape has rapidly evolved over the past five years, emphasising the need for our legal framework to keep pace with these technological advancements. The Bill introduces several key changes. Firstly, in 2018, the mandatory incident reporting for CII only covers systems under the CII owners' control. The amendments to section 14 will require CII owners to also report incidents targeting computer or computer systems under the control of suppliers to the CII owners. Secondly, amendments to section 2 updates the definition of "computer" beyond that of physical systems to give CSA the flexibility to separate virtual systems from the supporting physical infrastructure. The new section 7(1)(a) allows CSA to designate a computer or computer systems located overseas as a CII. This allows CSA to safeguard our essential services, even when CIIs go into cloud and the assets are not in Singapore. Thirdly, the amendments to Part (3)(a) ensures providers of essential services remain responsible for ensuring the cybersecurity of the service it provides even if the CII is outsourced to a third-party vendor.”
“Mr Speaker, I do share a differing view from Mr Leong. He said our children should not be exposed to and learn from such topics when it is a bit more complex. I would like to thank the Minister for his clarifications that the CCE lesson is aimed at allowing students to share and receive diverse views, and arrive at their own conclusion on complex issues – because they are already exposed to it from the social media. I am certain that there would be even more complex issues in future which our students would be exposed to and we would have to teach them to approach these in a way that maintains our social, religious and racial harmony in Singapore. So, my supplementary question to the Minister is, given the threat of worsening geopolitical tensions, whether it is China-US tensions or Taiwan, or conflicts against races or religions in other countries, how will the Ministry decide when the different issues will be addressed as part of the CCE lessons? Would it be useful for students to discuss these topics before the tensions are significantly heightened?”
“I would like to thank the Minister and Senior Minister of State and Senior Parliamentary Secretary Rahayu for the clarifications. Just some clarifications in Malay, Mr Chairman. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] My thanks to Senior Minister of State Zaqy for sharing that the MTS has been expanded further to include subjects, like Additional Maths, as well as Biology. May I suggest to the Senior Minister of State that we encourage Secondary 3 and Secondary 4 students to participate in programmes, like Learning Journeys, so that they can be acquainted with the kind of jobs and skills that are required in the growth industries? My second question: can we also provide specific programmes to encourage learning of skills in subjects, like AI and cybersecurity, so that our students and workers will have the best chance to work in the growth industries?”
“Within our community, we have started professional networks, such as MMiT and MMs in Engineering. The volunteers from MMiTs and MMs in Engineering have supported the programmes, such as Learning Journey, Raikan Ilmu and Hashtech. In the Hashtech competition recently organised by M3@Pasir Ris-Punggol, volunteers from MMiT and MM in engineering assisted students to explore skills in AI. Could the Minister also share how professional networks in our community can come together to share insights on the industry for students and potential mid-career switchers? Building Up our Youth Mentoring Capability (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Beyond educational support, mentoring plays an important role to equip our youth with emotional support and career guidance, so that they can achieve their aspirations. Aside from mentoring programmes in educational institutions, M3 has also started to roll out mentoring programmes in some M3@Towns. At M3@Pasir Ris, we launched a mentoring programme where young professionals provide mentoring support to at-risk youths in secondary schools. I am heartened that, through this programme, all the youth beneficiaries managed to pass their year-end examinations, and more importantly, they gain a more positive outlook about their future. Could the Minister also share how these mentoring programmes could continue to be relevant and effective in supporting the needs and aspirations of our youths?”
“Thank you, Chairman. Chairman, in Malay, please. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] A strong educational foundation remains a key pillar in helping both individuals and families achieve success and social mobility. Organisations like MENDAKI play a crucial role in supporting our children and youth at different stages of their education journey, through programmes like the KelasMateMatika (KMM) and MENDAKI Tuition Scheme (MTS). Could the Minister share how programmes, like KMM and MTS, have helped our students and how the programmes have grown over the years? Beyond programmes like KMM and MTS, how can programmes like Learning Journey by MENDAKI's Future Series Team and M3@Pasir Ris-Punggol provide avenues for youths to explore the jobs in the growth industries? Over the past year, the learning journey programme has given our students the chance to visit more than 10 science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) companies, such as Google, SIA Engineering Company, Rolls-Royce, SMRT and SAESL. How can we encourage more youths to attend such programmes, so that they can be inspired and learn more about opportunities in the growth industry? Support for Professional Development of Workers (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] In his Budget speech, Deputy Prime Minister Wong shared that there will be many economic uncertainties ahead. Therefore, to ensure that our Malay/Muslim workers continue to have good jobs, we must equip our workers with the knowledge and skills to be resilient, participate in growth industries and seize opportunities in the future economy. Could Minister share whether there are plans to better support our Malay/Muslim workers to ensure that they are better prepared to thrive in the future economy?”
“Chairman, in Malay, please. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] The Administration of Muslim Law Act (AMLA) was amended last month to enable MUIS to create the Singapore Community Wakaf (WMS). We must continue to think of ways to meet the future needs of our community and the AMLA amendments lay the foundation for WMS to serve as a community endowment fund for social and religious development. In my speech during the AMLA amendment Bill, I shared about the importance in having the WMS as a sustainable revenue stream and how its returns can be used to prepare for medium- and longer-term needs of our community. This includes ensuring that our madrasahs are supported with sound and sustainable funding, so that we can continue to offer quality education, provide different development pathways to enhance the skills of our religious teachers, as well as meeting the long-term needs of our mosques and madrasahs including land lease renewal. Can the Minister share more about the plan to build the WMS corpus to ensure that we are prepared for the future needs of our community? How can we encourage more of our community members to contribute to the WMS?”
“Chairman, we have made progress in uplifting wages of lower-wage workers. Workfare Income Supplement (WIS) and PWM are two important policies that must go hand in hand to uplift the wages of lower-wage workers. Firstly, what is the progress on the expansion of the PWM? I welcome the raising of the income qualifying cap from $2,500 to $3,000 for those 30 years and older. What will be the percentage of workers who will benefit from WIS with the higher qualifying cap? What is the target of lower-wage workers that the Ministry would like to provide support for? The raising of PWCS ceiling from $2,500 to $3,000 and the raising of the co-funding level for the increase in wages of the lower-wage workers from 30% to 50% shows the Government’s commitment to help increase the wages of the lower-wage workers while helping businesses with this wage cost increase. How long will these co-funding levels last? The support of consumers and employers are integral in this success. How has the PW Mark assist businesses?”
“Chairman, I am heartened to see that while we work on growing our economy and equipping our workers with the right skillsets, we are also focusing on strengthening our social compact by ensuring growth is inclusive and with work-life balance for workers. FWAs will be a key enabler for this, but it must be done in a way which balances the needs of both employers and employees. FWAs can be in the form of flexible time, flexible place and flexible load. Does the Minister have any updates on the guidelines on FWAs and how its adoption in the public and private sector can be encouraged? How do we harness the potential of senior workers, mobility-challenged residents, caregivers and women back to work through FWAs? Have our guidelines moved the needle for hiring them? How do we assist companies to manage FWA requests while maintaining harmony, fairness and productivity in the workplace? Seniors in Employment”
“Chairman, there are many industries in Singapore that are growing and competing for local workforce. SkillsFuture provides the platform for the current workforce to develop the skills required in the economy and WSG supports with assisting the workforce with job placement and career conversion through programmes, such as CCP. While we strengthen and provide the opportunity for our Singaporean workforce, we must continue to remain open and connected to support economic growth. Can the Minister provide an update on how our foreign workforce policies will continue to support our business needs while ensuring that local workers can continue to compete fairly for good jobs? And while the number of Work Permit holders have rebounded post COVID-19, how does the Government intend to manage the inflow of Work Permit holders, given the resource and infrastructure constraints?”
“Temporary financial support for the involuntarily unemployed is not something new in Singapore and for some residents, the ComCare does just that. Some countries have practised some form of support for the involuntarily unemployed but many end up with poorly designed unemployment benefits, which can inadvertently make it more attractive for involuntarily unemployed workers to stay unemployed rather than to return to the workforce. How has the Ministry incorporated learnings from these countries and feedback from the public and tripartite partners in the design of the upcoming support scheme for involuntarily unemployed jobseekers? How will the support scheme be administered? What is the anticipated average duration of support required for the involuntarily unemployed? How do we ensure that while the support scheme must assist the involuntarily unemployed, it does not make it more attractive for the involuntarily unemployed workers to stay unemployed? Can we ensure retraining and upskilling using SkillsFuture credit and actively searching for jobs including compulsory attendance for career, curriculum vitae and interview coaching be prerequisites for support? Sustaining Wage Growth”
“I thank Minister Chan for his reply and addressing our PQs as part of the COS. I think it is important that we provide an opportunity for our students to discuss current affairs in CCE, as they are already presented with this information. But one challenge of doing this is emotions can, indeed, be very raw and it requires masterful facilitation in order to achieve the intended objective. So, a few supplementary questions for our Minister. How do we check that our teachers are ready to facilitate such discussions without imposing their own opinions on the matter? I welcome the suggestion that we should do it in pairs or at least provide some guidance to the teachers or some support to the teachers while they go through it for the first few trials. Second, I welcome the Minister's reply that the information is to be updated. Can I suggest that we share the instances where we re-voted for ceasefire and support for humanitarian assistance, suggested in October 2023, in February, and in the past 50 years, on our stand on supporting humanitarian rights? Thirdly, as we deal with these changes, will we be pausing the lessons? And before we restart it again, can we trial the lessons with a focus group or with a pilot group of individuals and get their feedback on it? On information, in particular, there are rumours that the infamous Samuel and Arun slide was not created by MOE. Can the Minister share a bit more insights on to that? And lastly, I have raised a PQ on what support is provided to teachers when they receive backlash from parents and the general public, and whether the school management will take action against the teachers who are subjected to these complaints. I think we need to support our teachers and educators a bit more in this space.”
“Mr Chairman, how will the Ministry intend to introduce the ITE Progression Award? What are the types of diplomas that will be applicable for this award that is in line with the needs of the industry? Will it be applicable for diplomas from independent schools? ITE Education”
“Mr Chairman, I applaud the SkillsFuture Level-Up Programme, which provides $4,000 top-up for Singaporeans aged 40 and above, subsidies to the second publicly funded diploma or publicly subsidised diploma, and the ITE Progression Award. On the SkillsFuture Top-Up with targeted scope, I have spoken regularly on this over the past few years, and I am glad to see that the top-up is confined to selected training programmes, which are industry-oriented, with better employability outcomes. Given that there are over 29,000 courses on the SkillsFuture website, how will the Ministry decide which training programmes will be eligible for this top-up funding? What will be the criteria? How will SSG work with the industry to identify courses which are industry-oriented with better employability outcomes? There are often multiple training vendors for one type of training. How do we prevent over-inflated training fees to prevent excessive claims by training vendors? And instead of tying it for better employment outcomes, can we also have some of it tied to the productivity or improvement outcome it brings to the company? PwDs' Access to SkillsFuture Courses”
“As we strive towards building a Community of Success, how can we support Berita Harian's capabilities so that it can provide a Singaporean Malay perspective on current affairs for the region? GenAI Sandbox”
“What are the Government’s plans to build compute capacity to support our growing AI and digitalisation needs? How do we secure the chips and not be overly reliant on a single source? And how can we develop this energy-intensive, high-performance computing sustainably for Singapore? Lastly, given the success of platforms, such as Singpass, HealthHub and so on, how can we continue to better Singaporeans’ lives through digital? How can we provide Singaporeans easier access to Government services through digital? How can we use digital and technology to assist residents with special needs, such as the visually handicapped and our seniors? How can we use digital to bring our community closer together? Support for Vernacular Papers Mdm Chair, for my next cut, in Malay please. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Since 2023, Berita Harian has transformed and shifted its focus from a newspaper that is exclusively print-only media to a digitally-ready platform. It now offers many innovative products in the Malay language and on multiple digital platforms to engage current and new readers. From a podcast like #notapis, Instagram Reels, TikTok, BH Hub, BH lab, innovative content, and even organising community forums, the Berita Harian team has transformed how news is delivered to Malay readers, in line with the needs of the community. My first question is how do we continue to support Berita Harian in terms of its manpower or budget to continue developing these Malay language products? Secondly, although the Malay language has a small user base in Singapore, there are many more Malay readers in the region.”
“have equal opportunities that AI and digital provide? From a business perspective, AI is a general purpose technology that applies across industries. The technology is not confined to just companies in the tech industries or MNEs only. How can we support our SMEs across industries to leverage AI to improve their value proposition, productivity and processes? Secondly, some reports mentioned that 70% of workers will see AI impacting their current jobs. Can the Minister provide an update on the Industry and Jobs Transformation Maps across the industries? How has AI changed the Industry Transformation Maps? How do we proactively support workers who may be displaced by this technology? Through NAIS 2.0, how do we identify opportunities for our workers to upskill and apply AI in their jobs to boost their productivity and add value to the industries that they are in? It is also anticipated that more than 15,000 workers are required in the AI field. How will MCI work together with MOM to deliver the 15,000 AI practitioners required in the industry? How can we have specific Career Conversion Programmes to provide more talent with this skillset? As we build the critical mass of practitioners, we will also have to develop our depth talent in the industry. At the top end, how do we attract world-class talents to bring AI capability into Singapore? How do we build our own depth capability with researchers in AI in our local institutions? Thirdly, Mdm Chair, to develop a thriving AI industry ecosystem in Singapore, we must develop the infrastructure to stay ahead of the emerging trends and demands. Other than fast network speeds, high-performance computing capability is also a necessity for AI.”
“Thank you, Mdm Chair. Madam, in the Motion on "Building an Inclusive and Safe Digital Society" that was raised by our GPC in this House last month, the House reaffirmed our commitment to adopt a whole-of-nation approach to sustain trust by building an inclusive and safe digital society. In the Budget Debate earlier this week, I shared that I am glad that we commit to invest more than $1 billion over five years for our National AI Strategy 2.0 which will focus on building the infrastructure, developing our workforce and the industry. In my next few cuts on this, I will focus on a few key items on the National AI Strategy 2.0. Firstly, how can we provide equal and equitable opportunities such that the opportunities brought about by AI do not only benefit the few at the top? I raised this during our Motion in January, too. This includes ensuring NAIS 2.0 provides opportunities for all segments of Singaporeans, bridging the gap between the haves and the have-nots and also ensuring our SMEs are involved in developing their capability. Secondly, AI is said to be a general capability that reads across industries and will have impact across multiple industries. How will NAIS 2.0 refresh our Industry Transformation Maps and Job Transformation Maps? How do we build the talent pipeline? Thirdly, how do we build the infrastructure necessary for Singapore to be a powerhouse in AI development? Lastly, how do we better lives through digitalisation? Firstly, as we go digital and embark on transformation under the National AI Strategy, how can we ensure that all segments of Singapore are able to tap on the opportunities AI and digital provide? How do we ensure the digital haves and the digital have-nots, especially school-going children from lower-income families.”
“Mr Chairman, in his Budget speech, Deputy Prime Minister Wong shared that the international environment has darkened dramatically – major powers are prioritising national security over economic interdependence in this current geopolitical climate and there are other potential headwinds, like BEPS 2.0, that may affect Singapore's competitiveness to attract investments. In light of this, how do our global FTAs remain relevant and create conditions for cross-border investments and boost Singapore's competitiveness?”
“I would like to thank Member Mr Louis Chua for his question. Mr Speaker, Sir, I am not saying that we should go against the spirit of BEPS 2.0. I am just saying that when it comes to attracting investments, we should not limit our capability to attracting investments, which would mean requiring us to provide certain benefits or support in order to bring the investments into Singapore.”
“As we head towards the uncertain future our fiscal discipline, our refreshed social compact and our focus on keeping our society strong and united will be integral to define how well we can navigate the uncertainties ahead, turn challenges into opportunities and progress for Singapore and ensure that despite all the challenges ahead of us, we continue to look out for one another, care for one another, in a vibrant, resilient and inclusive community. Mr Speaker, Sir, I support the Budget.”
“Enhancing the effectiveness of SkillsFuture to focus on capability building and real productivity improvement is something that I have often spoken about in Parliament too. I have raised this in my maiden speech, in the Budget Debate 2022, Income Tax (Amendment) Bill 2023, National Productivity Fund (Amendment) Bill 2023 and SkillsFuture (Amendment) Bill 2023. Hence, I welcome these enhancements, especially the $4,000 SkillsFuture Credit top-up, for selected industry-oriented training courses as it will enable our workforce to focus on capability development to drive innovation towards higher value outcomes. Lastly, how do we ensure the Budget is sustainable for future generations? Mr Speaker, Sir, the Budget tackles the immediate challenges brought about by the higher costs of living, pursues better growth and jobs by anchoring quality investments, equips our workers for the future economy, creates more paths towards equality and mobility, provides more assurance for families and seniors, invests in a safe and secure Singapore and safeguards energy security amidst the energy transition. There are many challenges ahead of us and there will be pressures to spend more. The Budget addresses the key challenges and builds our capability as we look ahead and it does so with a balanced fiscal position, where we do not spend beyond our means. I am heartened to hear the reassurance from Deputy Prime Minister Wong on upholding the ethos of fiscal discipline and responsibility to ensure our fiscal position always remain balanced, sound and sustainable.”
“Similar to my speech, the Leader of Opposition quoted Deputy Prime Minister Wong's speech that the "international environment has darkened dramatically" and we expressed caution towards Singapore's future in the uncertain global environment. I can tell you for certain that it is getting increasingly difficult to attract foreign investments into Singapore and I am glad that the Refundable Investment Credit is an additional tool introduced to assist in attracting investments into Singapore. Mr Chua mentioned that we should not go against the spirit of BEPS 2.0. But I am worried if, philosophically, he is comfortable with limiting the capability of the tools that we have to attract investments? To attract investments – our lifeblood for Singapore – here is where theory diverges from reality, where we are fighting tooth and nail for more investments into Singapore. Is this what Mr Louis Chua is advocating for? I can assure those in the Chamber that attracting investments into Singapore will continuously be more challenging and we want to equip ourselves with the full disposal of tools to attract good investments into Singapore to create good jobs for our people. Secondly, how do we ensure that everyone enjoys the progress and we continue to provide more support to those that need help? I am pleased to hear the continued commitment to upskill and reskill our workers through our SkillsFuture Level-Up Programme, provide enhancement support to our low-waged workers through the enhancements of the Workfare Income Supplement (WIS), SkillsFuture Mid-Career Training Allowance and the introduction of the Institute of Technical Education (ITE) Progression Award.”
“Given that the proposed top-ups to NPF is half of the budget of the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth (MCCY), how do we measure success so that we can quantify the returns on this investment? As a member of the Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI) Government Parliamentary Committee (GPC), I am also glad to see our commitment to invest in more than $1 billion over five years for our National Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2.0. I will elaborate more on it in the Committee of Supply (COS) debates. Something that I have also always talked about in this Chamber is the rising cost of doing business and the uncertain impact of the implementation of Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) 2.0. This is something that I have raised in the Goods and Services Tax (GST) amendment Bill in November 2022, Budget 2023, National Productivity Fund Bill in August 2023 and in this Budget debate again. In the GST amendment Bill, I have also challenged the perception from some of the Members that BEPS 2.0 alone will be sufficient to make up the "hole" left behind by not raising GST. I am glad that in yesterday's speech, I may have heard Mr Louis Chua agreeing with Deputy Prime Minister Wong's position, that there will be spending to offset impact of implementing BEPS 2.0 and there is still a lot of uncertainty on how businesses and countries will react. The Member goes on to say that he hopes that the introduction of Refundable Investment Credit does not go up against the spirit of the global BEPS 2.0 implementation. He also mentioned that he hopes that it is not returned back to MNEs in other forms. I find that as an extremely worrying position.”
“This then brings in jobs globally for our local small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) who, together with its workers, have a fair share of the pie through schemes, such as the Partnerships for Capability Transformation scheme. We then come to the next question of how to develop the workforce capability? We had Workforce Singapore (WSG) in the exhibition hall promoting the sector, encouraging the Career Conversion Programme to bring more mid-career professionals into the industry and skills upgrade, through SkillsFuture, to better prepare the workforce for the growth of the industry. At the side of the hall, we had AeroCampus, where schools were sharing courses on aerospace engineering to prepare our talent pipeline, and the students toured the AeroCampus, learning more about the industry from seasoned professionals. There is no single ingredient of how we continue to attract quality investments into Singapore, but rather how our schemes, policies and agencies continue to collaboratively synergise. Working together to create a vibrant and innovative economy is our competitive advantage to the world. We must continue to balance these levers and leverage on more to continue to make Singapore a vibrant and viable investment location. Hence, I am glad that in Budget 2024, it was announced that there are $3 billion investments in the Research, Innovation and Enterprise (RIE) 2025 grants, $2 billion top-ups to the National Productivity Fund (NPF) and Financial Sector Fund each and the enhancements to the Partnerships for Capability Transformation. While I support the intent, given the size and scale of the NPF, how do we ensure that the funds are effectively used by businesses to drive real productivity, add value to the industry and transform the industries?”
“We must have a strong, vibrant and innovative economy which will then bring good jobs and hence, better lives for all Singaporeans. That is the formula for economic progress in Singapore. However, the competition to attract quality investments is getting stiffer. We have heard of countries, such as Japan, Germany and the United Arab Emirates, rolling out vast amounts of subsidies to attract investments. I agree with Deputy Prime Minister Wong that we cannot afford to engage in this "bidding war" with the major economies, but what we can do is to strengthen the vibrant ecosystem that makes it conducive to attract investments in Singapore. Mr Speaker, let me declare that in my previous and current roles in strategy and business development for a multinational enterprise (MNE), I have had the opportunity to understand the considerations an MNE has before it invests into foreign countries and what makes them decide to trigger that investment. A conversation that I had with a Senior Executive of a large MNE at the Singapore Airshow best sums it up. Beyond the buzz of the dynamic display, he mentioned, while overlooking the hall, "There is no place in the world where we have such a clear view of the ecosystem of support for any investment, such as that shown in Singapore." True enough, at the front of the hall, we have the Economic Development Board (EDB) hard at work attracting the investments. We then have JTC Corporation championing sustainable industrial development. MNEs looking to develop their business, including our local homegrown MNEs, like SIA Engineering Company and ST Engineering, pursuing business development.”
“Deputy Prime Minister Wong also mentioned that it would be messier and more unpredictable. If we take a step back and observe the world around us, we can see many examples of conflicts or of communities wedged apart by differences, or of fragmented post-election struggles to form government and of parliaments in deadlock that they cannot pass important bills to help the country. Very often, the fractures and the wounds driven by wedging differences often lie so deep that it will take generations to resolve and mend. If we look at the world around us, Singapore sticks out like a sore thumb, for what we have is an anomaly. And this did not happen by chance and should not be taken for granted. In the past few years, how Singapore came together – not without our own fair share of challenges – has enabled us to sail through this storm. With the uncertainties and challenges ahead, how we continue to stay together with our refreshed social compact and our focus on keeping our society strong and united will be integral to define how well we can navigate the uncertainties ahead, turn challenges into opportunities and progress for Singapore and ensure that even with all the challenges, we continue to look out for one another and care for one another, in a vibrant, resilient and inclusive community. And it is through that lens that I will respond to Budget 2024. Firstly, how do our schemes and policies work together to drive progress for Singapore? Secondly, how do we ensure that everyone enjoys the progress and we continue to provide more support to those that need help? And lastly, how do we ensure that the progress is sustainable for our future generations? Mr Speaker, Sir, it is of no doubt that quality investments are the lifeblood of Singapore's progress.”
“Mr Speaker, when I speak to many residents on what they are looking for in the year's Budget, many reply, "Will the Government give us more this year?" There seems to be a growing expectation, especially with the cost-of-living pressures, that every Budget should have a giveaway package, such as our Assurance Package. And even after all the announcements are made on the full extent of the Budget, when asked for their views, there are some who continue to focus on the immediate needs, such as how much more Community Development Council (CDC) Vouchers they will be receiving. However, more and more residents come up to me and share that they are getting increasingly worried about our future, if Singapore can continue to grow and prosper and if this trajectory and Budget is sustainable. The phrase used by Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong in his Budget speech was, "cautiously optimistic". Deputy Prime Minister Wong shared that there is considerable uncertainty in the outlook and the risks are tilted to the downside. What struck me was the challenges that he shared ahead. He mentioned how the international environment has darkened dramatically, something that was also picked up by the Leader of the Opposition yesterday. The three decades of peace and stability in the post-Cold War era is now over, and he shared that we now lived in an era of conflict and confrontation. And the Deputy Prime Minister also mentioned that the world will be more violent, as we see a growing zone of impunity involving armed conflict and terrorism that cannot be easily resolved by the global community. When we look around us, the world seems to continue to be more fragmented as major powers are prioritising national security over economic interdependence.”
“Jobs Support Scheme made sure workers remain employed during challenging times. I, for one, as one of the over 25,000 aerospace workers in the industry, saw first-hand how the Jobs Support Scheme managed to keep many Singaporeans employed when our borders were shut; the Small Business Recovery Grant assisted SMEs to stay afloat; SkillsFuture provided support for our workforce to upskill and upgrade to meet the needs of the future economy; and the Senior Employment Credit ensured seniors get an opportunity for employment. Hence, before I end my speech, I would just like to say a huge "thank you" to the Minister and all those working in the Ministries for working very hard to design and administer the grants and schemes for everyone who needs it, especially during the last few years. Clarification notwithstanding, I stand in support of the Bill.”
“We know of the syndicate that defrauded Skillsfuture of about $40 million and last year, in January, Parliament passed the amended SkillsFuture Singapore Agency and Skills Development Levy Act so prevent the abuse of Skillsfuture funding. How will the amendments in this Bill enhance the enforcement and prevent the fraudulent claims and provide more effectiveness to recover money that were disbursed based on false information? A quick check on SkillsFuture website also shows that there are over 29,000 courses available. Most courses have multiple vendors or course providers. However, the course fees and hence, SkillsFuture grant varies. Take Lean Sigma Green Belt Certification as an example. The course leads to an industry accepted certification but one provider charges five times more per course and gets three times more the funding received by the other provider, for the same outcome for the participant. I am not referring to this specific example. But how do we ensure course fees are not inflated and do not become an opportunity for companies to claim higher subsidies? Lastly, the penalty proposed can be equal to three times the amount received or an imprisonment for a jail term not exceeding three years. If there are excessive checks, will this deter those who truly are in need from seeking the support that they require? Mr Speaker, looking at the Second Schedule, I am grateful to see the long list of money, credit, rebate and other grant schemes introduced by the Government, especially over the past three to four years to provide support for all segments of our society facing many different challenges. Schemes like COVID Support Grant and SIRS supported those who lost their jobs or had a pay reduction during COVID-19.”
“Mr Speaker, this Bill provides for the recovery of any money, credit, rebate or other grant schemes introduced by the Government or a statutory body from persons that are not entitled to or who were wrongly given the grants. I am in support of the Bill. However, I have a few points of clarification. Firstly, the Second Schedule lists many schemes, such as the Wage Credit Scheme, Senior Employment Credit, Jobs Support Scheme but does not specifically identify COVID Support Grant (CSG) and Self-Employed Person Income Relief (SIRS). Will these two schemes and other schemes not listed be included in the Bill too? The reason I ask is because I have met elderly and unemployed residents who have approached me for assistance as they have been requested to return the SIRS that they have received previously. Some shared that they did not apply personally for the grant and were assisted by their family members or friends. Hence, they cannot recall details of their application. They also mentioned that they have already spent the SIRS money and do not have any money to pay back and are not working. How will these cases be treated? Secondly, I noticed that almost all the schemes mentioned in the Second Schedule are for schemes that were introduced between the COVID-19 period from 2020 and 2023. From these schemes, what is the total amount of money, credit, rebate or other grants recovered so far from falsely or wrongly given claims? Does the Ministry have any indication if there was an increased amount of false claims during this period and hence, this Bill allows the smoother recovery from false or wrongly given claims? Thirdly, for Skillfuture Enterprise Credit, how do we ensure the grants that are provided are effectively disbursed?”
“While companies can also put in policies to prevent workplace discrimination in their organisation and to prevent the discrimination for mental health and encourage mental well-being at the workplace, translating these strategies into practice poses significant challenges. For example, how do managers manage conversations and, in particular, performance appraisals, as it is the season now, for colleagues or subordinates with mental health conditions without making them feel discriminated, especially if their performance is affected by it when compared to other peers? How do we then balance and manage the expectation with the rest of the team too? These issues cannot be legislated. But the devil is in the details when we try to translate the intent into practice. If we want the approach towards mental health to change in the workplace, employers, employees and the people leaders must be equipped with the right skillset to drive that change. Should that skillset be made available as a guideline for employees on the "do"s and the "don’t"s or should we impose it as a legal requirement by MOM? Or will it be something where we highly encourage employers to upskill their employees from a SkillsFuture perspective, as suggested by fellow Parliamentarian Mr Edward Chia? Mr Speaker, Sir, as I have mentioned earlier, the discussion continues and is a work-in-progress. I am glad that our society continues to have this discussion as we refine our approach and come to a collective agreement on what we, as a whole-of-nation; Government, businesses, organisations, communities and individuals, can work together towards our inclusive society. I stand in support of the Motion.”
“For Mdm Elena, some of the grassroots leaders, such as Mr Charlie Cheong, offer to care for her parents while she gets a haircut, goes to the market or takes the day off from caregiving. How can we continue to encourage more from the community to come forward and provide assistance to support the mental burden of such caregivers, especially in our fast-ageing society? To borrow the words of fellow MP Mariam Jaafar in her speech earlier, "We must care more for each other in our society." Secondly, on improving workplace mental health and well-being, we know that good work is beneficial for our mental health. A healthy state of mental well-being can also contribute to improved productivity. According to data collected from MOM, one in three employees found it challenging to cope with work demands and pressures or felt exhausted physically or mentally from work. Based on a survey conducted by MOM, there was an increase in the proportion of job seekers who faced discrimination due to mental health conditions, from 2.9% in 2021 to 5% in 2022, as well as an increase in the proportion of employees who felt that they were discriminated at work due to mental health conditions, from 3.2% in 2021 to 4.7% in 2022. The National Mental Health and Well-being Strategy aims to address these issues by improving mental health literacy at work, reducing stigma, supporting the employment of individuals with mental health conditions, customising mental health support according to occupational needs and preventing discrimination through fair employment practices.”
“Beyond policies and Ministry effort, we need the wider community to have the right knowledge and understanding about mental health conditions that will aid their recognition, management or prevention. This includes the ability to recognise symptoms of mental health conditions and to know where to seek help. Hence, it becomes increasingly important to strengthen the informal support networks in the community. Let me share with you three cases of our residents in Pasir Ris East. Last Friday, I met Mdm Tan during our house visit. Mdm Tan is 70 years old and taking care of her bedridden mother with dementia. She shared with me how difficult it was to be caring for her own mother when she herself was getting older. But she said with a smile, "As hard as it is, it is my duty as she is my mother". One of our other residents, Mdm Elena, is herself in her mid-60s. She has no siblings and is not married. She is taking care of her two elderly parents; her father in his 90s goes to the daily dementia care home and her mother, who is in her 80s, has dementia and stays at home. Another one of our residents, Mr Aziz, is a kidney dialysis patient in his 70s and taking care of his mother with dementia, who is in her 90s. There are many individuals like Mdm Tan, Mdm Elena and Mr Aziz who are retirees but themselves caring for their parents. Caregivers can undergo an immense amount of stress, what more when the caregivers themselves are dealing with their own challenges. Beyond policies from MOH, how can the community come together to support individuals like this better? In Pasir Ris, our community volunteers through our Pasir Ris East care store, visit the families every third Saturday of the month to catch up with them and check on how they are doing.”