Tan Eng Liang
Singapore
“Sir, in the light of Government's emphasis on road safety and the strong measures indicated by the Hon. Minister, I would draw the Minister's attention to the conviction in court of a school bus driver who caused the death of two students in my constituency. He was sentenced to eight months' imprisonment.”
“Furthermore, the concessions in personal income tax rates effective from Year of Assessment 1978 have benefitted most taxpayers in the higher income group. I, therefore, do not see any justification to warrant a revision of the $4,000 limit allowable for purposes of tax deduction.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I am not in a position to debate with the hon. Member whether or not the 5% increase given in 1974 was adequate. But if he feels that the situation now warrants another increase, perhaps we can have a look at the position. Dr Augustine Tan: Mr Speaker, Sir, just as a matter of interest, what would the Hon.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I beg to report that the Committee of Supply have come to a certain resolution. Resolution reported - "That the sum of $250,000,000 shall be supplied to the Government under the head of expenditure for the public services shown in the First Supplementary Development Estimates of Expenditure for the financial year 1st Apri…”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, the Consumer Price Index at constant prices in 1972 was taken as 100. In 1973 it was 117.7. In 1974 it went up to 144. That was the period when the ex-gratia allowance was given. In 1975 it was almost the same, 147.7. In 1976 it was 144.9. In 1977 it was 149.5.”
“ADJOURNMENT Resolved, "That Parliament do now adjourn sine die." - [Mr E.W. Barker]. Adjourned accordingly sine die at Twenty-six minutes past Four o'clock p.m.”
The complete record
Every one of 441 lines we hold for Tan Eng Liang, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 7 of 9.
“"Enhanced rate" means the new rate revised on 1st April, 1975. In addition to this compensation, he is given a cash grant of $11,800 in lieu of alternative accommodation or, if he so prefers, a three-room improved flat in a New Town is given for free. For those recommended for land allocation, that means those who qualify for land allocation, ex-gratia compensation will be paid for his house and other improvements but at the lesser rate. "Lesser rate" means the rate before the revision. Let me give an example of what I mean by "lesser rate" and "enhanced rate". There is a difference of approximately 30% to 50%, Compensation for a house and a kitchen with concrete floor and drain, at the enhanced rate will be $7.50 per sq, ft. At the ordinary rate, that means he is entitled to land allocation but is still paid a compensation, the compensation will be at the lower rate of $4.50 per sq, ft. On top of this, those squatters who were on the land when the census was taken will be entitled to some compensation based on the ordinary rate, and they will be given priority as far as rental and purchase of HDB flats are concerned. In fact, families affected by clearance are given priority for rehousing in HDB flats with a rental rebate of $15 per month for a period of three years. If they purchase a HDB flat the downpayment is reduced to $100. The other form of alternative accommodation given for those affected will be shophouses. In this respect my Minister has indicated the rising rental formula which means that during the first year the tenant pays 50% of what the commercial value is and it goes up in subsequent years to the end of the fifth year, that is, on the sixth year, the tenant pays the full rate.”
“10 durian trees, 10 pigs and 500 head of poultry, the flexibility of this Resettlement Panel may rule in his favour. All the factors are spelt out in this list here. In other words, the assessment of criteria for a bona fide farmer is actually fairly generous. These criteria have been effectively implemented from 1971/72 and it has not been made public because this has all along been an internal administrative procedure. To come back to what was discussed yesterday on the recommendation of alternative land allocation for resettlement cases. This is the point when we began to talk about the bona fide of farmers, and we said that a farmer must have 100 pigs or 3,000 head of poultry. In fact, he might be given half an acre of land if he farms to this extent. So it goes down the line: if he has 1,051 pigs and 15,001 head of poultry, he will be given two acres of land. There is a table of figures here that gives the whole range, Therefore, the consideration of all these cases of whether an ordinary bcna fide farmer belongs to this category which is eligible for enhanced compensation or to another category which is eligible for land allocation, is processed by the Resettlement Panel chaired by the Director of Primary Production. I have indicated to Members that they can appeal to this Panel and if they are still not happy they can go straight to the Ministry of National Development. Let me give Members some idea of how this compensation is paid. This had been discussed yesterday. The ex-gratia compensation awarded to these farming cases ("farming case" means farmers as defined by the Department). Those who find their own accommodation will be paid exgratia compensation for their house and other improvements at the enhanced rate.”
“The Panel has in the past reexamined many cases of appeal and I shall later give Members very brief statistics to show that many cases were settled in favour of the appellant. First of all, I think the term "bona fide farmer" is a misnomer. After today's debate, it is our intention to tell the PPD to stop using the term "bona fide farmer". This term "bona fide farmer" has been used to describe a situation for enhanced compensation as resettlement benefits. The present definition of a bona fide farmer means anybody or any farmer who is engaged in any farming activity to the extent of any of the following "criteria" (since there was implication that there were no criteria): Livestock farming: Pigs 25 heads, poultry 1,000 tieads. Vegetable farming: In the case of leafy vegetables, if you have an area of 1,800 sq. ft. A cultivated area of 1,800 sq. ft. of water cress and 3,600 sq. ft. of other leafy vegetables. Fruit farming: 20 durian trees or 40 rambutan trees, or an equivalent number of similar type of fruit trees. Orchid growing: Orchids and flowers cultivated over an area of 10,000 sq. ft. Fish farming: 1� acres of pond fish-breeding. Aquarium fish 7,200 sq. ft. tank area. This means the surface area of the fish tank not the area of the farmer's particular estate. Aquarium plants 5,000 sq. ft. of cultivated area. There are a number of queries on borderline cases. For instance, if a farmer has only 20 pigs, we do not straightaway eliminate his eligibility. We will try and re-define his case based on a combination of factors. If he has only 20 pigs and 800 head of poultry, we might define him as a poultry farmer. Or if he has a combination of any of these factors, say.”
“The rates were last reviewed in 1975 and the revised rates were made known to the general public through the mass media. At this juncture it is worthwhile to clear the misunderstanding over the definition of bona fide farmers yesterday. This arose from a query by the Member for Punggol when he talked about land allocation and the criterion of 100 pigs or 3.000 head of poultry. To clear, once and for all, this implication that there are no criteria and that the Primary Production Department arbitrarily decides who is a bona fide farmer and who is not. I shall give Members all the criteria used so that there will not be any future queries as to what is this and what is that, if they can put up with me. Before I go into that, let me say that the bona fide status of a displaced farmer is determined by the staff of the Resettlement Department on certain guidelines provided by the PPD. As the current resettlement policy provides enhanced resettlement benefits for displaced farmers, including higher rates of ex-gratia payment of compensation, payment of a cash grant or a free three-room flat in lieu of land allocation, all cases have to be referred to the Department of Primary Production for examination and verification. There is a panel chaired by the Director of Primary Production to review all these cases. In fact, if any particular squatter or settler is unhappy over any decision taken, he can appeal to this Panel, which comes directly under the charge of the Director of PPD. If the Panel should rule against the appeal of this squatter or settler, he can take it one step further by appealing to the Ministry of National Development, which has the final authority over the PPD.”
“I have explained just now why it is not always possible for the Resettlement Department to inform Members of Parliament in advance. As I said, sometimes resettlement officers themselves do not know the nature of development. Sometimes it is necessary to keep it confidential where the position of the land is uncertain. I hope Members can appreciate the point. However, the Department has made it a rule to inform the Member of Parliament of the respective constituency in which the relevant site is located of any impending resettlement action before the field staff are sent out to conduct a census survey. I think those rural Members of Parliament can vouch that they are informed and that we do send officers to help during the period of difficulty. The last change of residential address on the identity card before the cut-off date will be taken as conclusive evidence of the displaced person's eligibility for resettlement benefits. However, in borderline cases the Resettlement Department has accepted other official documents such as TOL, income tax returns, birth or death certificate, vaccination or inoculation certificate, radio or TV licence, driving licence, or any other evidence to suggest physical occupation of the site before the cut-off date. However, arising from such complaints of Members, the Resettlement Department is now drawing up a list of what we call "official documents" which can be accepted by the Resettlement Department as evidence of residence. In future this list will be attached to the clearance notices served on all displaced persons. The next query the Member mentioned is about the ex-gratia compensation payable to people affected by the various land acquisition or development projects.”
“Members here that if they have complaints of rudeness or are unhappy over certain activities of these officers, then do let us know so that an investigation can be carried out. The Member for Telok Blangah queried about the need to conduct a census survey, His suggestion that a census survey on resettlement cases be conducted only when alternative accommodation is available is not practical. Census survey of resettlement squatters has to commence in advance because the magnitude of the problem has first to be ascertained and provision made for alternative accommodation. Furthermore, sufficient time is required to examine the squatters' eligibility, to process the improvement on their land, to compute the quantum of compensation payable and to comply with all the legal formalities such as serving notices to quit, etc, 4.45 p.m. The Member for Jalan Kayu has I think brought up a number of points. First, let me deal directly with his query on the cut-off date. The main object of a cut-off date is obviously to prevent unscrupulous owrers of buildings or structures on State land or HDB land due for clearance from selling them to unsuspecting persons at perhaps exorbitant prices. This also prevents some members of the public from cashing in for priority of HDB flats by paying out tea money to owners of structures os~ these acquired sites. The Board has actually issued several press statements informing the general public of what these rulings are. The date of Gazette notification is taken as the cut-off date for eligibility in respect of private land compulsorily acquired by Government. In respect of State or HDB land, the cut-off date is the first day of taking of census by the Resettlement Department.”
“Sir, let me give a brief picture of the Resettlement Department so that Hon. Members can understand why resettlement officers who go round resettling people or taking census really do not know themselves what the actual programme of resettlement is. The Resettlement Department carries out resettlement of families in affected areas at the request of the various Government Ministries or statutory bodies. The Jurong Town Corporation can request the Resettlement Department to clear certain areas. Similarly, the URA, the HDB itself, the Ministry of Communications, etc, No reason is given except that that particular area has been gazetted for acquisition as the land is required for a public purpose. This means that the resettlement officers themselves do not know what kind of development is going to take place in that particular area. So do not blame them if they honestly say that they really do not know. If any Hon. Member should feel strongly that they have to know what the area will be used for, then the best thing is for him to find out which particular Ministry or statutory body is acquiring that area and inquire directly from them. The staff of the Resettlement Department, as indicated by the Hon. Member, faces tremendous problems. Nevertheless, they are told to be patient and courteous towards the public at all times. We have heard in the House that it takes both sides to exercise good relationship. Some people who receive resettlement notices adopt a resentful and even hostile attitude towards resettlement officers, and that is admitted. But I believe, by and large, working in such a stressing situation resettlement officers generally have performed their duties reasonably well. But nevertheless I can assure all Hon.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, the Housing and Development Board is sympathetic towards the situation at Moulmein. In fact, the houses may be put up faster if there was an "act of God". Anyway, a few houses in that particular area have been acquired by the Government. I can assure him that the people there would be given alternative accommodation. The reason for the long delay is that many areas in Singapore are under clearance for development, for example, the Changi Airport project and other project and other projects in the Central Area. But to me it is a reasonable delay because there are other residents in other areas who have waited for more than two years. Unfortunately, that particular area mentioned is just outside the Central Area, and we have not reached the stage of requiring it for priority development. Let me assure the Member that the HDB will look into this matter, and if we can expedite matters we will do so.”
“For example, in a family of seven where one member of the family is unfortunately not in a good condition, then I think we will have no hesitation in giving preference to that particular family. On the other hand, for example, if a family of father, mother and two children wants to apply for a five-room flat, when we feel that they should be quite contented with a two-room flat, then unless there is urgent reason for somebody else to have it, we have no hesitation in giving preference to this family. There is also a transfer registration involved. In other words, we have to take into consideration the length of time he has been on the waiting list. Let me assure Hon. Members that while there is contradiction, seemingly so, the administration of the implementation of transfer preferences is done after taking all factors into consideration. 4.15 p.m. Finally, to answer the Member for Kim Seng. In the case of Tiong Bahru, if I am not mistaken, the one-room emergency flats have been knocked down and in their place one-room improved flats have been erected. But here again, the priority of providing more new HDB flats is uppermost in our minds, Therefore, priorities come into play. But let me assure him that wherever there is an urgent need, there will be no hesitation in knocking down the very old one-room emergency units with common corridors, and common facilities and building the new improved one-room units,”
“I would like to inform him that the Board does conduct periodically training courses for all grades of officers when they first join the Board or some time after joining the Board. Such courses include HDB orientation programme, and for those involved in finance there are courses on financial administration, management report writing for executives, training within industry, and also courses on job relations, job methods, job instruction, courtesy to the public, handling of public requests and how to serve the public. Like all other organisations. HDB officers are instructed to be courteous and polite to members of the public. But being such a large organisation with nearly 10,000 employees, it is therefore inevitable that complaints are made against some employees from time to time. But in all cases of complaints, investigations are thoroughly carried out. I would like to assure all Hon. Members that if they have any specific complaint about any particular officer in any particular area, please let me know and we will investigate into it. Lastly, to answer the contradiction implied by the Member for Potong Pasir and the Member for Kim Seng on the two-child family concept versus a large family of seven to 10 children. Let me first merely say that if the observation of the Member for Kim Seng is that there are 23 occupants in one room, then I think probably most of them are illegal immigrants. As far as administrative implementation of transfer is concerned, where I am directly responsible as Chairman of the Allocations Committee, discretions are exercised between, say, a seven-member family versus a family of father, mother and two children. In all cases of transfer special consideration is given to the human aspect.”
“While the HDB is aware that substituting concrete blocks for these weld-meshed openings reduces ventilation, it is a necessary precaution against spread of fire in these congested one-room flats. I do not think we should await a serious occurrence of fire for this to be tested. But to satisfy Members, we have done an informal inquiry into the situation after a few Members of Parliament have complained to the officers of the Area Offices. We have got a survey which shows that approximately 70% of the openings, that means the previous weld-meshed openings. completely closed. In addition, some 25% to 30% were partially closed prior to this decision to close them up. Let me give some figures. In Toa Payoh East, it was found that 70% or these openings were closed. In Henderson, 70% were totally closed and 25% were partially closed. In Balestier. 70% were completely closed and 30% partially closed, which means a 100% coverage by the survey. I think the question of privacy and the nuisance of having things thrown into one's flat is uppermost in the minds of the residents as far as they are concerned. But from the HDB's point of view, what is most important is that these openings are definitely a fire hazard. However, to double check the reliability of these statistics, the HDB will select a block of one-room flats due to be completed soon and provide larger openings along the walls fronting the access corridor to test the ventilation, and to observe its effectiveness during the next 12 to 18 months. The Member for Mountbatten has correctly pointed out the need of a good public image for our public housing programme. I think we share his sentiments and, in fact, this is precisely what we are trying to do.”
“Members may be aware that the Ministry of Home Affairs is already looking into a proposal for the setting up of a Block Committee comprising national servicemen and volunteers from amongst the members of the public, including members of the CCCs and MCs if they are available, to assist in the prevention of crime, vandalism and other anti-social activities in Housing Board estates. It is therefore premature for the Housing Board to consider the proposal for another special unit. I would suggest that we wait for the performance of this particular unit which is being set up by the Ministry of Home Affairs, and if the need should arise we can always reconsider his request. The Member for Aljunied is a bit disappointed with the dark corridors in the housing estate in his constituency. As I have earlier pointed out, the Tanjong Rhu housing estate and the housing estate in his constituency belong to the older generation of one-room flats. I think the only way to convince Hon. Members is that, if one goes to the one-room improved type of flats at Telok Blangah, one can definitely see an improvement in the design, lighting, and so on. The main reason has been enunciated by both the Member for Aljunied and my colleague, the Member for Leng Kee. I have no actual cost-effectiveness of glass louvres versus simple glass versus weld-mesh openings. But I think it can be said that Iouvres are more expensive If he is interested. I will give him a reading tomorrow on cost-effectiveness. I think the several incidents of fire that had occurred in these one-room flats have prompted the HDB to initiate this action.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, on behalf of my Minister, I want to thank the Hon. Member for Henderson for his very kind compliments. But the answer to most of his queries will be "No". The Member has correctly pointed out that the complaints of noise nuisance, the washdrippings and vandalism of lifts and so on are definitely an indication of a lack of civic responsibility on the part of residents. In that direction there is very little the administration of the HDB can do. However, it is a valid observation that there is this lack of a big community hall for functions, like weddings and so on, to be carried out. But one must bear in mind that while we are improving the facilities in the newer estates, as I have indicated earlier, there must be priorities. Everybody is asking for facilities, such as sports fields and playing fields. It is now suggested that we should have a community hall for social activities. With a little bit of initiative, perhaps renting a hall at the community centre or some school hall could make-do for the sort of function that the Member has in mind. I think there is need for a little clarification here. When my Minister mentioned that there was 90% success, he was referring to shops on the public tender system, and there was no implication of such success with hawker centres in housing estates. To answer the Member's query on the setting up of a special unit to promote social activities. I have already stated earlier on that the answer is "no", The reason is this.”
“- I may be wrong - that the qualitative aspect, improvements of social amenities and so on, is taken into consideration. But I stand to be corrected.”
“Sir, I would like to assure the Hon. Member for Telok Blangah as far as his request for an assurance on those two points are concerned. But to be fair to the press release issued by the Ministry of National Development - I have it right in front of me - he mentioned that there was no substantive suggestions given to his observation. Let me simply quote something positive: 'In cooperation with the Public Utilities Board, the sanitary pipings are now tested before the flats are ballotted and any leakage is made good before handing over the flats to the residents.' In fact, there is another paragraph right at the bottom which also answers his query. As I said, if he is satisfied generally, we will stop at that. As regards the deregistration of that particular vehicle, the simple reason why I know about it is that the Member had written to me about this particular car, a Volkswagen, which came up during his meet-the-people session. All I am saying is that if he can produce the deregistration certificate from the ROV, I can assure him that the parking fee will be immediately refunded for whatever period that has not expired. To come back to the Member for Jalan Kayu, all I can say is that our public housing is at the moment the cheapest form of housing accommodation available in Singapore. I think it is because of the subsidy that land is assessed at way below the normal market price, and I do not intend to query or quarrel over the figures because they were supplied to me. As regards the qualitative aspect, I think that where the statistics and the survey are concerned, it merely points to cleanliness. That means the maintenance of the estate as a whole is comparatively cleaner. I do not think .”
“The Board is now building another swimming pool, south of MacPherson Estate, for the residents in MacPherson. Another swimming pool and sports complex will be built off Alexandra Road to serve the residents in the old housing estates in Bukit Ho Swee and Redhill. Another sports complex will also be built at the junction of Jalan Bukit Merah and Henderson Road to serve the residents of Telok Blangah New Town as well as Tiong Bahru and Henderson Hill Estates.”
“But despite that, we will try our best to make some improvement to the hawker centre that the Member mentioned, but it could only be a minor improvement. For example, we have sacrificed green areas in this estate to make way for more car parks. To compensate for this lack of facilities or social amenities in the old housing estates, not necessarily in the Member's constituency alone, the Board is now systematically studying the various housing estates to provide additional facilities, wherever possible, within each estate if land is available. Based on this particular policy, a swimming complex, as the Member has mentioned, has been built off Mountbatten Road, but correctly pointed out by him, it is meant not only for the residents of Tanjong Rhu but also for the residents in the Old Kallang Airport Estate.”
“The Member has complained about the unreasonableness on the part of the car park attendants in not permitting visitors to housing estates to stop just to pick up a passenger, a friend, or a baggage. The Housing Board now issues pink tickets for such vehicles to enable the driver to park for a duration of five minutes without any charge. He has also asked why has the minimum parking fee been increased from 20 cents per hour to 40 cents per hour, and why is there the need to restrict parking up to 10.00 p.m, or 11 .00 p.m, for visitors. The answer is that it is mainly due to the administrative problem of shift work. For example, we cannot change shifts at midnight. Members should grant us that little administrative ability. Owing to administrative difficulties there are certain ways to go about exercising restraints. To illustrate that this is an administrative decision, the charge in the minimum fee of 20 cents for half an hour parking is slowly being withdrawn from the public car parks under URA. There are administrative difficulties. Let me assure him that it is not an honest mistake. It is a deliberate and well-thought out administrative procedure. 3.30 p.m. Lastly, let me answer the Member for Katong. He has sadly lamented on the old estate at Tanjong Rhu. It is a fact that the Tanjong Rhu housing estate was built under the first five-year building programme when the standard of public housing was obviously among the lowest. Because of numerous complaints and so on, attempts have been made to improve. Again, due to the restricted site and the lack of additional space around to expand, there is very little the HDB could do.”
“I would like to assure the Member that there is a constant review of the administration and policy of the Housing Board in conjunction with the Ministry of National Development, with the main object of improving both the concept of public housing in terms of design and the administration of public housing in terms of running these housing estates. The Member for Bras Basah has raised a number of points. First of all, let me tell him why there is a need to charge for use of the Housing Board car parks. The object of paid parking is merely to control car parking either in public housing estates or on the main roads. It also ensures that there is proper use made of the car parks. If there is no control of car parks, inconsiderate car owners can easily cause obstruction and create problems for other car owners. Therefore, a paid parking system will eradicate this problem. It will also prevent any encroachment by lorries and trailers and also stop junk-yard operators from dumping their vehicles in the car parks meant for residents of the housing estates. The Member may be aware that the HDB has very recently (I think it was last week) introduced a pilot scheme whereby parking lots are reserved for visitors to park their vehicles in the HDB car parks after 11.00p.m. To give some details, visitors are required to pay $1 for a permit to park their vehicles from 11.00 p.m, at night to 7.00 am, the next morning. This scheme has been implemented as a pilot project and it is being carried out at Toa Payoh West, Toa Payoh Central, Stirling Road, Henderson and Buona Vista housing estates. If this scheme proves to be successful, the Board may extend it to other areas.”
“Obviously, the intention of establishing a statutory board is to ensure that it has more flexibility and that the administration could function smoothly and efficiently and not be bogged down by too much red tape and bureaucracy, as in the case of a department of the Government, like the Land Office or the P\ND. Another point on which the Member has expressed concern is in regard to the coordination and planning of new estates. It is not fair to compare the older estates with the newer estates. I can assure the Member that the very fact that Ang Mo Kio will be vastly different from, say, the old Alexandra Estate, must clearly indicate that the HDB has been receptive of ideas and observation from the Backbenchers and the public in improving both the design and social amenities in the new housing estates. I can assure the Member that this is so. On his particular complaint about Toa Payoh Police Station, according to the Housing Board's record, the piece of land was reserved for a police station for the last three to five years. But somehow the programme of the Ministry of Home Affairs did not meet with this requirement. Lastly, the Member touched on the public tender system. I can only refer again to my Minister's statement made in this House yesterday afternoon, when he said that the existing public tender system has proved to be satisfactory and there is really no' reason to change what has already been proven to be a good system. Moreover, a fixed price system does not ensure that consumer products will be cheaper.”
“The other point raised by him is on the Survey. It is only fair that I should g ye the actual interpretation of the Survey by those who wrote this particular article. It has been indicated that in 1968 a large percentage of the residents were from resettlement cases cleared from the slums in the Central area. Therefore, 75.2% of the people interviewed have indicated that it is obviously cleaner to live in housing estates compared with their previous environment. However, in 1973 there were fewer clearance cases and some of the residents had moved from the older housing estates to the new housing estates as a result of the splitting of families, etc. Therefore, only 49.2% of the people consider that their new environment is an improvement over the old housing estate environment. However, in the 1973 survey only 9.6% of the people consider that cleanliness in the Housing Board estates is inferior to their previous environment. Therefore, it cannot be interpreted that the cleanliness in the Housing Board estaies has deteriorated in the last few years. think cleanliness depends both upon the residents and the maintenance and service team of the HDB. If the residents do not adopt clean habits, no amount of maintenance by the HDB can really keep the estates spick and span. Another point raised is the suggestion that perhaps a top civil servant should be appointed Chairman of the Housing and Development Board. The present system of appointing a part-time Chairman to the Housing and Development Board has proved to be extremely satisfactory. The intention of appointing a Chairman or members to sit on a statutory board is to reap the richness of the expertise of top executives in the private sector.”
“It should be borne in mind that whatever the Housing Board charges the People's Association, the price of the land is kept extremely low. The next question raised was in regard to helping the tenants and the contractors. As he has correctly pointed out, contractors are licensed by the Housing Board. But if complaints about them are substantiated, then the Housing Board can do something; perhaps their licence could be terminated and their deposit of $5,000 forfeited. They can also be black-listed and debarred from doing any renovation work in any Housing Board estate. I think I have covered all the queries raised by the Member for Telok Blangah. The Member for Jalan Kayu has raised a number of points. The first was about the provision of better maintenance services for residents of Housing Board flats. I think it is well understood that the Housing Board is continuously striving to improve the standard of maintenance and services in its housing estates. A good example is the introduction of the Essential Maintenance Service Unit and the Lift Emergency Unit which provide a round-the-clock service to attend to urgent calls for correction of any defective electrical installation or to attend to complaints of normal choking of sanitary pipes and fittings. The present charges for these services are well below actual cost and, in fact they have to be subsidised. To give some figures, the expected income from the collection of service charges is estimated to be $52.8 million against an expenditure of $58.4 million. My Minister has indicated yesterday that for the next financial year the Government will subsidise the Housing Board to the tune of $46 million. Part of this money will be used to subsidise the maintenance and services section.”
“I am glad the Member has read it. The second point which he raised is whether the Board could refund the proportion of the unused fee for a season parking licence taken by one of his constituents. The Board cannot make such a refund to a resident who has already been allocated a parking lot. This means that he had been successful in balloting for a parking lot and had thus deprived another person of that particular parking lot. The same principle applies to a person who pays road tax to the Registry of Vehicles. If he decides to sell his car, he cannot ask the ROV for a refund of tax for the unexpired period. It is between him and the purchaser. The same principle applies to a TV licence. But, to satisfy the Member, should the car owner deregister his car immediately, that means, he really takes it off the road, then the Board would allow a refund of the unexpired season parking charges, to keep in line with Government's policy of discouraging car ownership. In respect of this particular car. I have checked with the ROV this morning and I found that it has not been deregistered. Another point raised by the Member is about the Housing Board being a stickler of principles in regard to the processing of plans for community centres. Let me reply by simply saying that whenever the People's Association decides to build a community centre in a Housing Board estate it forwards its plan to the Ministry of Finance for endorsement. In the meantime the Housing Board goes ahead with the processing of the plan. At this point it is the normal practice for the Housing Board to request the People's Association to pay for the piece of land as soon as it can. In fact, a six-month extension period is normally given.”
“Let me first answer the question raised by the Member for Telok Blangah. Together with a few other Members, he has raised some observations on the need to improve the standard of workmanship in public housing. As a result of their observations, the Ministry of National Development issued a press statement on 21st February, 1976, explaining in great detail the causes of the poor workmanship. I have a copy of the statement here which could be handed to the Member at a later stage.”
“Sir, the provision under this subhead is to meet expenditure, as the Member has indicated, for the supply of free water at the remaining public standpipes and outdoor taps in the rural areas. Our policy as mentioned by him still stands. There are only two standpipes today at Jalan Betek, off Lim Chu Kang, and five outdoor taps at Rifle Range Road which cannot be dismantled for the time being as they are for use by the residents in that area who have no other source of water supply. To give an indication of how our policy has been implemented, the number of standpipes has been progressively reduced from 2,471 in 1966 to two in 1976. As and when alternative water supply is available in these particular areas, the remaining standpipes will be removed.”
“Sir, the Member is championing the cause of the fishermen in his constituency. As far as anti-pollution measures are concerned. I have said that he could bring the matter up directly with the Ministry of the Environment. As far as the Primary Production Department is concerned. I have indicated that we would be very happy to pursue the matter further with the Ministry of the Environment to satisfy his request.”
“This particular unit is looking into the artificial breeding of udang gala and soon hock, a variety of carp. The Division is also looking into the possibility of cage-net breeding of Chinese carps in the reservoirs and garoupa near and around the costal waters. It is also looking into the artificial breeding of fingerlings by culture. They are all at different stages of research and development. We hope that something will come out of these research programmes. But, as the Member has indicated, the main activities are at the Jurong Fishing Port and the other fishing centres, that is, the Central Fish Market at Jurong and the Kangkar Fisheries Centre. There is a question on the Jurong Fishing Centre by the Member for Jurong. I think I can sum up by saying that the activities of the Central Fish Market at Jurong have increased tremendously in terms of encouraging trawlers to bunk at this particular fishing centre. It has also encouraged other indirect or related activities, such as the provision of deep-freeze facilities. It has also a fish meal factory nearby. It is trying to encourage related facilities in that particular centre so as to enable more fishing trawlers to call at Singapore. The Member may know that we do buy fish from the Russian, Japanese, and Taiwanese trawlers and also from Thailand. I have figures to show that over the past year there was an increase of total gross tonnage of almost 77.636 tons over the previous year. There is also an increase of unloaded fish, approximately 1 7.4%, over the previous year. I have more or less summarised the more important points on the activities of the Fisheries Division. But if Members are interested to have more details, I have them all here.”
“Sir, I presume that the Member for Punggol in the first part of his query is referring to the Lorong Halus Dumping Ground of the Ministry of the Environment, which is situated along the Serangoon River. Yesterday the Minister for the Environment has indicated to the Member that bunds have been built along the river bank as a means to prevent waste from being washed down into the Serangoon River. If the Member feels strongly regarding the pollution control procedures or matters, my Ministry will be happy to take it up with the Ministry of the Environment. I was told that at the mouth of the Serangoon River the fishermen are catching crabs. I do not know how true this is. According to the Ministry of the Environment, the pollution is not all that bad. As I have indicated, if the Member feels strongly he can refer this matter to the Ministry of the Environment. 7.30 p.m. As regards illegal trawlers, the Primary Production Department has not received any complaint on this matter and I have no information to offer. If the Member can supply me information on the trawlers' activities, we can look into the matter. The third matter which he wishes to seek information is the Fisheries Division which, as he has correctly pointed out, is playing an extremely important role in ensuring a sufficient supply of fish for Singapore. The Fisheries Division has done a few things in that direction. Of immediate relevance would be the type of research work that is being carried out in the Division, in particular the freshwater laboratory called the Aqua Culture Unit. This is a relatively new field. The intention is to rear freshwater or aquarium fish for production, just like the traditional Chinese method of culture.”
“But if that particular area is required urgently, for example, an immediate construction of roads, then the Authority is in no position to grant an extension of time because of the urgent need by the relevant competent authority. Under normal circumstances where there is no urgent requirement. then in all cases a reasonable extension of time is given. As regards the procedure for appeal, there is a provision that if they are not happy with regard to specific items of compensation, they can write directly to the Ministry or, if they feel strongly, to the Minister concerned. We have received a few appeals arid these are being investigated. If the investigations reveal that there is unfair assessment of the various items, then there could be a decision to upgrade the amount of compensation. With regard to compensation and to whether a farmer is bona fide or not, we have to adopt certain criteria. If we do not start off somewhere, there is no way to assess whether or not a farmer is entitled to it, In all cases of resettlement, whether he is a bona fide farmer or not, some form of compensation is given. For example, if at the time of census-taking and even if he is an illegal squatter, priority as far as rental is concerned is also given to him. Most farmers are happy in the sense that they feel that they qualify as bona fide farmers and so would be entitled to alternative land for farming. I think the main problem, as my Minister has indicated earlier, is that due to a shortage of land we have to encourage intensive pig farming, and in this respect we regret we cannot liberally grant a non-bona fide farmer the privileges of a bona fide farmer.”
“Let me assure the Member that if he could submit details of his information to us, we will definitely look into the allegation. To come back to the question as to what are the criteria used to differentiate between a bona fide farmer or an efficient farmer, and a non-bona fide farmer, the Minister has indicated just now some general guidelines. We say that if a farmer could rear 100 pigs or 3,000 head of poultry and do it reasonably well, then he would be a genuine farmer. He must grant the PPD technical officer the ability to assess whether he is an efficient farmer or not. I think that is reasonable because if the officer is familiar with animal husbandry techniques, the type of housing, the type of management and the way they feed their animals, he can quite safely conclude whether that farmer is efficient or not. The general criteria for assessment are this figure of 100 pigs or 3,000 head of poultry, and also at the same time the management of that particular farmer. The second point queried was about the assessment for compensation. I would like to tell him that the Primary Production Department has a set rate of compensation which has been revised upwards on 1 St April, 1975. I am in no position to tell him exactly what grade of officers go to the farms to make assessments of a durian tree, a rambutan tree, etc. However, I shall be happy to supply him the information any time he wants them. As regards the unfair demolition without any consideration for an extension of time, this could be answered together with the query by the Member for Potong Pasir who asked whether sympathetic consideration could be given to allow a vegetable farmer to harvest his vegetables so that he could sell them. Under normal circumstances the answer is yes.”
“To answer the Member for Sembawang on the Primary Production Department doing something to help poultry farmers in a situation where eggs are flooding the market, I would say that, being familiar with poultry and pig farming myself, his claim of a loss of five cents per egg is highly exaggerated. If such a situation is true, the poultry farmer must by now be a bankrupt. Let me assure him that the price of eggs, like the price of pork, is dependent on the supply and demand. In fact, it is neither the intention nor is it desirable that the Primary Production Department should interfere with the market forces by any form of direct control. But indirectly the Primary Production Department does try to help the farmers by teaching them how to bring down the cost of production, how to improve their feeding techniques, better husbandry techniques, and even providing an effective animal health service. In addition, the Department also monitors at all times the prices of animal feed and feed stuffs, and the price fluctuation of eggs and pork. If there is a situation such as what the Member has mentioned, the Primary Production Department makes an indirect attempt by talking to both the animal stock feed manufacturers, the farmers and the relevant associations. In other words, the role of the Primary Production Department in this case is an unofficial and indirect one. The Member for Jurong has made a few allegations on the unfair decision taken by the PPD in the classification of what we call "genuine" or "bona fide" farmers. He even alleged that there was perhaps some wrongdoing in the sense that information had leaked out to certain farmers who would then know exactly when a PPD officer would be coming to make an assessment.”
“Mr Speaker. Sir, I have just now indicated that there are other requirements, such as regulations for boundary. We will take note of the point and my Minister has agreed that he will consider the Member's request when it is submitted for consideration.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, while I stand corrected for the misinformation that was given to me, my colleague here, the Minister of State for Communications understands that the Master Plan (Rural Zone) allows one temporary dwelling house on a plot of land of not less than one acre, This is merely to retain the rural character of the area concerned. But I understand the point raised. It is a reasonable request, if you are talking of the extension of the eaves. If the request does not affect the boundary and its regulations then there is no reason why we should not consider it.”
“I am with the Member that if, for example, the plot of land is of an indefinite size then, in fact, the Building Control Division may allow a person to put up more than one building. But the plot is on TOL and it is of a certain standard size. The recommendation is for a particular type of house, a building with three rooms, plus kitchen and toilet. It is planned to fit into that particular TOL plot so that there is a reasonable boundary with one's neighbour. I happen to know this matter quite well because I have received complaints from one or two rural constituents. I am in sympathy with their view that it is unfair to expect them to employ an architect to change a particular plan, because if they get an architect who knows all the regulations on boundary requirements and so on and so forth, he can draw up a plan entirely different from the guide plan from the Division. If any particular constituent in a rural constituency has a plot of land which is of a certain size and there is justification for constructing more than one building or an extension to the building, as I have indicated, I would be happy to look into it.”
“Let me repeat that we will give very sympathetic consideration to cases where rejection has been based on small technicalities, as he has implied. Let me come to the question of why we have allowed the second floor of a building to be used as premises for an association and not the third floor. As I am familiar with the position of the URA in his particular constituency, let me assure him that there is coordination between the URA and the BCD. For example, when there is a deadline for a particular resident to be moved out, extension is liberally given if there is strong justification. In fact. I am very familiar with this matter because the letters would first come to the URA. They then go to the BCD and on BCD's advice, or vice versa, extension is given in most cases. If the second floor of a building is allowed to be used by an association, I am with him that there is no justification to turn down an application if the association prefers to occupy the third floor. But more often than not I think the reason is that if we allow the premises to be used by an association, it involves a change of use and, therefore, the application is turned down: it being a residential area. But if the Member can give me the particulars of the case, I would be very happy to look into it, To come to the Member for Punggol. He has mentioned about the aroma filling the dining room. My Minister has asked me to reply to him. It is very unfair to put the toilet outside and expect one's neighbour to inhale the aroma. Let me say that the building plan given to the rural constituents is meant, in the first place, as a guideline. One must bear in mind that the plot of land is under TOL.”
“Sir, let me, first of all, answer the query on the rigidity of the Building Control Division in approving applications for change of use of buildings. The records of the Building Control Division show that in 1974. 465 or 55% of applications for change of use, out of a total of 848, were granted. In 1975, 698 or 62% of applications, out of a total of 1,119, were approved. In other words, the flexibility that the Member for Bras Basah is asking for is liberally granted, as far as change of use is concerned. I think all Members here will appreciate the important need for the control of a change of use. Otherwise all kinds of nonresidential use will creep into residential areas, thereby adversely affecting the amenities of the residents. We are- equally aware that it is totally unrealistic to completely brush aside applications for nonresidential uses, many of which may provide useful services to the community such as those illustrated by the Member for Jalan Kayu and strongly supported by the Member for Whampoa. As far as the small type of community service is concerned, such as bringing home a few dresses to sew, I do not see any involvement in a change of use of the premises. It is only in a situation where, say, in a floor of a residential estate you have seven or eight sewing machines and five on six seamstresses employed on a daily basis, then the question of a change of use arises. 6.30 p.m. In this sort of situation I regret to say that flexibility cannot be exercised. But in those situations which the Member has mentioned, I am definite that consideration will be given. Let me assure the Member for Bras Basah that if any of his constituents is aggrieved by the decision of a competent authority like the Building Control Division, he can appeal to the Minister.”
“Sir, while it is a compliment that I have more power than the Hon. Member, he must bear in mind that JTC comes directly under the Ministry of Finance and the Chairman may have more power than I do. However, I think it is a fain proposal. We will take the initiative by contacting JTC and see whether there could be an agreed formula, If it is necessary some formula could be worked out. After all, it is the Ministry of Finance that is funding it.”
“To come to the Member for Jurong, I am extremely sympathetic towards his observations because I used to travel along that road about a year ago. According to the PWD, a number of improvements have since then been made. It is granted that the previous Minister for Law and National Development did suggest that he would look into it. But there are three reasons why the Member's request cannot be entertained. First of all, as far as the PWD is concerned, the JTC is the authority for Jurong Town. Secondly, the matter was referred to the JTC but they felt that there was no justification at this stage to construct a bridge across this particular area. It is obvious that the cost of construction for such a long bridge would be prohibitive. Thirdly, although the JTC was not in favour or could not justify the construction of this bridge across, the PWD on its own has done as much as it could to widen the roads at Upper Ayer Rajah Road, extending West Coast Road into Jurong Town Hall Road, together with a number of other proposals. I regret that at this juncture the PWD has no intention, and it has no budget for 1976/77 anyway, to carry out this expensive construction project. I would suggest that, if the Member is really keen, he should convince the JTC of the need for this project and we can decide who is to foot the Bill.”
“The PWD is at the moment carrying out certain road maintenance works in the CBD, such as road resurfacing and painting of lines, white lines in particular, during the night or off-peak hours or during week-ends. However, in regard to excavation of roads for the laying of the various utility services such as electricity, water and gas, serious problems may arise if such work is carried out during the night. For example, in certain areas of the CBD where there are residents it would create a noise nuisance to the residents. It would also create the problem of unfinished work which, by the following morning, would cause a heavier traffic congestion, probably increasing the accident risks. Moreover, we may have the difficulty of getting people to work at night. The Member raised a third query in regard to the widening of Upper Thomson Road and Sembawang Road. The programme at the moment involves three stages. The first stage is the extension of Sembawang from Mandai Road to Jalan Sembawang Kechil. This stretch of road is approximately 4.511 metres long. The second stage covers from Upper Thomson Road at the Sembawang Hill Circus to Mandai Road. This is equivalent to 3,205 metres long. The final stage would mean the final construction from Jalan Sembawang Kechil to Admiralty Gate. This stretch of road is about 2.027 metres long. We have just only begun Stage I in July 1975.lt is expected to be completed in July 1976. The completion of all three stages will take us up to 1978. I have no figures to tell the Member how much it will cost. But if he is interested to know how much is the cost of Stage I as well as the other stages I will be very happy to supply him with the information if he will write to me.”
“Sir, let me first answer the questions raised by the Member for Sembawang. During the early 1960s bicycle tracks were provided in all new road projects and some of these tracks still exist in such areas as Queenstown, Commonwealth Avenue, Lornie Road and Thomson Road. But the result of a study of bicycle traffic shows that cyclists, like the Member for Sembawang, prefer to ride along the main carriageway instead of on the tracks provided for them. For example, during the Cycling Week you could see him cycling night on the open road and not on the track provided. Since then the provision of bicycle tracks has been excluded from all new road programmes of the PWD. I think we are all agreed that cycling is a good recreational exercise, but it is obviously less effective and less efficient than, say, buses. We have done a research which clearly shows that a bicycle on the road occupies as much as one-third of road space for a car. This means that three commuters on bicycles occupy road space equivalent to one car. On the other hand, the new Jumbo bus, for example, which occupies road space equivalent to nine cyclists or three cars can take a load of 70 to 80 passengers. Therefore, the bus is at least five times more effective than a bicycle as a form of transport. We are all agreed with the Member that cycling is to be encouraged as a form of exercise, but it is definitely not practicable as a mode of travel, in particular, into the congested City area. As a recreational exercise, the Member must be probably aware, since he is a keen cyclist, that we have provided cycle tracks along the new East Coast Park. He is welcome to use them whenever he feels like it. He has also made the suggestion that we carry out road repairs during the evening.”
“Sir, I have already indicated that "the situation will be kept under constant review." The Ministry of National Development, together with the relevant authorities such as the Traffic Police, will be too happy to consider whether any interim measure could be taken until construction of an overhead bridge is justified. RESIDENTS ON SPECIAL PASS (Applications for identity cards) 4. Mr Ho See Beng asked the Minister for Home Affairs and Education if he has figures of persons residing in Singapore on special passes without identity cards and if he will give the reasons why applications from such persons for identity cards have been rejected.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, Tampines Road is narrow and cannot justify the construction of an overhead bridge. The Public Works Department recently carried out a study of pedestrian and vehicle traffic volumes at the junction of Tampines Way and Tampines Road. It was found that during peak hours an average of 130 pedestrians cross Tampines Road at this point. There was an average delay of eight seconds before they were able to cross the road. By exercising a little patience and care, pedestrians can cross in safety. Accident records show that there were only five accidents at this junction in 1975, of which three involved pedestrians and fortunately none was fatal. The situation will be kept under constant review.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir,I am glad to inform the Member for Punggol that the construction of two bus shelters at the junction mentioned is included in the 1976-77 programme. TAMPINES WAY/TAMPINES ROAD (Construction of pedestrian overhead bridge) 3. Mr Ng Kah Ting asked the Minister for National Development and Communications if he will consider the construction of a pedestrian overhead bridge at the junction of Tampines Way and Tampines Road as this place is accident-prone and several accidents have, occurred there.”
“Mr Speaker. Sir, the policy on pasar ma/am lies with the Ministry of the Environment. If there is a request from the Ministry of the Environment to use these car parks as possible pasar ma/am sites, the Ministry of National Development will be too happy to consider it. TAMPINES WAY/TAMPINES ROAD (Construction of bus shelters) 2. Mr Ng Kah Ting asked the Minister for National Development and Communications if he will consider the construction of two bus shelters at the junction of Tampines Way and Tampines Road.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I have indicated that, out of the remaining eight car parks, six have been converted into various uses. If the hon. Member is interested in their detailed use. I have all the figures here. For example, the fringe car park at Lorong 1. Geylang, is being operated as a fringe car park on working days. It is leased to the Singapore Shuttle Bus (Pte) Ltd for night garaging of buses. Similarly the fringe car park at Serangoon Road, where the Singapore Bus Service Ltd is using it for night garaging. Moreover, the remaining available space has been leased to the Housing and Development Board for car parking by the residents living there. To justify our claim that these fringe car parks are being considered for other uses, let me cite the example of the fringe car park at Kampong Java Road. We are thinking of converting a certain portion of the car park into recreational areas such as tennis courts or squash courts to be built by the Singapore Sports Council. Another plan is to interest the HUDC in the site at Chancery Lane which could be used as a possible site for middle income housing. The fringe car park at Whitley Road is used as a car park during the day. It is also leased to the Singapore Bus Service Ltd for day-and-night garaging of buses. The same arrangement applies to Holland Road car park where part of it is used as a Plant Sales Centre of the Parks and Recreation Department. The Delta Circus car park is also leased to the Singapore Bus Service Ltd for day-and-night garaging of buses.”
“Outstanding vacancies will be filled by recruitment/ad hoc appointments whenever suitable candidates are found. Generally, however, new recruits are able to contribute only after six months in service. In the Engineering Section, the Department has presently four vacancies out of a total establishment of 22 in the grade of Senior Technical Officer. Since there is a promotional post for serving Senior Technicians and Technical Officers, a service-wide promotion exercise is being conducted by the Public Service Commission and this should also be completed by December 1975.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, the traffic pattern at the junction mentioned was restudied a few weeks ago, and I am glad to inform the Member for Punggol that installation of a vehicle actuated signal system at this junction is included in the 1976/77 traffic signal programme BROADCASTING DIVISION (Turnover rate of Division I officers) 7. Mr J. F. Conceicao asked the Minister for Culture (a) what turnover rate there has been in the Broadcasting Division in respect of Division I officers in 1973, 1974 and the first ten months of 1975; and (b) whether any vacancies in Division I posts exist, and what steps are being taken to fill those vacancies. The Acting Minister for Culture (Mr Lee Khoon Choy): Mr Speaker, Sir, the turnover rate is as follows: Turnover Rate of Divsion I officers Resignations Appointments (1 Engineer ) (1 Senior Technical Officer) 1973 4 (1 Producer ) 1 (Producer) (1 News Editor ) (1 Accountant ) (1 Engineer ) 1974 4 (1 Producer ) 2 (Producers) (1 News Editor) (1 Producer ) 1975 1 (Producer) 5 (1 Engineer ) (Jan- (2 Editors ) Oct) (1 Senior Reporter) The vacancy position is as follows: No. of % age of Vacancies Establistment Producer/Assistant Producer 11 11.8 Editor/Sub-Editor 5 (including 1 13.1 Sub-editor leaving in December) Senior Reporter/Reporter 1 8.3 A recruitment exercise is currently in progress for the post of Editor/Sub-Editor and Senior Reporter/Reporter. The closing date for applications was 31st October 1975. It is hoped that the vacancies can be filled by the end of this year. A promotion exercise will be launched in the near future for the majority of the vacancies in the post of Producer for serving Assistant Producers and Assistant Producer for serving Division III officers with Production experience.”
“The metalling of 655 metres of tracks at Jalan Seranggong Kechil costing $50,250 is to be completed soon, and work on another 655 metres of tracks estimated to cost $35,400 will commence at the end of this month. LIM AH PIN/UPPER SERANGOON ROADS (Installation of actuated signal system) 6. Mr Ng Kah Ting asked the Minister for National Development and Communications whether he is aware of numerous requests for an actuated signal system to be installed at the junction of Lim Ah Pin Road and Upper Serangoon Road as a result of several accidents that had occurred in the area in the past few years, and if he will consider having such a system installed as soon as is practicable so as to provide better safety to all road users in the area.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, the metalling of tracks in Trafalgar Estate is being carried out in three phases. Metalling of 1.1 kilometres of tracks was completed in May 1975 at a cost of $64,570 and work on another 924 metres of tracks costing $48,450 is due to start soon. It will be completed in two to three months' time. The metalling of the remaining 1.2 kilometres of tracks will be considered next year. The Member for Punggol may be interested to know that his constituency has already committed to spend $141,000 against the allocated sum of $79,819 for this financial year under the URSC vote.”
“Sir, according to the Master Plan, which is reasonably stable, the area designated is for agriculture, in particular, poultry and intensive pig farming. But what the future will be - whether the Master Plan will suffice for five or 10 years - is subject to periodical reviews every five years. As we can see at the moment there is no likelihood of an alternative in the small island of Singapore.”