Valerie Lee
Singapore
“I would gladly lobby for this vision with Sharael, especially since much of the infrastructure sits within Changi. Mr Deputy Speaker, Singapore's story has always been one of reinvention. Our pioneers built a trusted port. Another generation built one of the world's finest airports.”
“I have two supplementary questions, one for MCCY. With fewer Singaporeans speaking dialects, the rich heritage tied to these dialects risk being lost. What steps is MCCY taking to ensure that Chinese-dialect cultures are being systematically documented, preserved and transmitted, particularly to younger Singaporeans?”
“Thank you, Speaker. I have two supplementary questions. Beyond recycling rates, can the Ministry consider complementary indicators and targets such as waste reduction, material circularity or recycling contamination rates to better measure progress towards a circular economy?”
“Thank you, Speaker and the Minister of State. First, I would like to thank LTA for partnering closely with me as I represent concerns and frustrations of residents in Pasir Ris and Changi, particularly on the ground where the impact of increased industrial and aviation activities is most keenly felt. I have one supplementary question.”
“Thank you, Speaker, and I thank the Minister of State. I have two supplementary questions. For successful deployment of AI in power generation, it will require engineers with both energy and data analytics expertise.”
“In conclusion, I have come to realised that good transport policies, like strengthening connectivity, improving safety and minimising disruptions, are in a very practical way, supporting the sandwiched generation and those around them, and this is what I have set out to do from the very beginning. Traffic Management”
The complete record
Every one of 69 lines we hold for Valerie Lee, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 1 of 2.
“I would gladly lobby for this vision with Sharael, especially since much of the infrastructure sits within Changi. Mr Deputy Speaker, Singapore's story has always been one of reinvention. Our pioneers built a trusted port. Another generation built one of the world's finest airports. Our generation must now build the next chapter – not simply by expanding our infrastructure, but by creating more value through technology, innovation and our people. When my residents ask me whether Singapore will continue to create good jobs as our transport hub evolves, I believe our answer must be a resounding yes. That means continuing to invest boldly, embracing new technologies, moving up the value chain and ensuring that Singaporeans remain at the heart of our transport story. But honestly, Mr Deputy Speaker, truth be told, besides good jobs, my residents will also greatly appreciate an enhanced bus connectivity to Changi Airport and the Cargo Centre. But I will save that for another debate. Mr Deputy Speaker, I support this Motion.”
“These are professional, managerial and specialist roles that will create greater value and better careers for Singaporeans. My question to the Minister is this: beyond strengthening Singapore's physical connectivity, does the Ministry have a long-term strategy to position Singapore as the region's nerve centre for transport and supply chain management? How will MOT work with other agencies and our tripartite partners to anchor these higher-value activities and the good jobs they create in Singapore? Finally, how do we maximise the opportunities presented by Singapore's Eastern Gateway, an idea my parliamentary and group representation constituency (GRC) colleague Mr Sharael Taha is extremely passionate about? T5 is one of the most significant infrastructure investments in our nation's history. It will strengthen Singapore's aviation hub for decades to come. But perhaps we should be thinking beyond T5 itself. Together with the Tanah Merah Ferry Terminal, Changi Airfreight Centre, Changi Business Park, Loyang Industrial Park and our close proximity to the BBK Free Trade Zone, eastern Singapore has the potential to become an integrated gateway for aviation, maritime connectivity, logistics, business and tourism. Rather than viewing them as separate developments, could we bring them together under one long-term vision? Could stronger integration between T5 and the Tanah Merah Ferry Terminal create a seamless air-sea connection, making Singapore the preferred gateway for travellers and businesses connecting through the Indonesia-Malaysia-Singapore growth region? Could this also catalyse new investments, create new businesses and generate even more good jobs for Singaporeans?”
“Their concern is whether they will be equipped to succeed in this new environment. I therefore welcome the Government' continued investments in workforce transformation like the OneAviation Manpower Fund and various SkillsFuture initiatives. But my question to the Minister is this: as we invest billions in T5, Tuas Port and new transport technologies, how will the Ministry ensure these investments translate into better jobs, stronger career progression and higher value opportunities for Singaporeans? Infrastructure alone does not create prosperity. People do. Second, Mr Deputy Speaker, much has been said about aviation and maritime. I would like to focus on the third pillar of this Motion – our logistics hub. When people hear the word "logistics", they often think about the action of moving goods from one place to another. But increasingly, that is not where value is created. The real value lies in planning, data, visibility and supply chain resilience, in the ability to anticipate disruptions before they happen and increasingly, in AI. Singapore has always moved up the value chain. We did not remain simply a trading post. We became a global maritime hub. Likewise, we should not remain simply a place where goods pass through. We should aspire to become the nerve centre of regional supply chains, where transport networks are planned, where supply chains are coordinated and where decisions are made. We should be the region’s "supply chain control tower". We already have many of the building blocks: a world-class airport, a world-class port, trusted institution and strong digital infrastructure. The jobs of tomorrow will increasingly be in transport analytics, digital trade, AI-enabled planning, supply chain optimisation and sustainability.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, Changi is where Singapore meets the world. Every day, hundreds of flights arrive and depart. Thousands of tonnes of cargo move through our airfreight facilities. People, goods and ideas connect Singapore to every corner of the globe. But for many of the residents I represent, Changi is something else. It is where they report to for work. As the MP for Changi and as adviser to the SIA Employees' Union and the Supply Chain Employees' Union, I have had the privilege of speaking to many Singaporeans whose livelihoods depend on our transport ecosystem – cabin crew, aircraft engineers, airport operations staff, freight forwarders, warehouse supervisors and logistics professionals. And on behalf of them, I will ask: as our transport hub evolves, will it continue to create good jobs for Singaporeans? Mr Deputy Speaker, I believe that is the central question behind today's Motion. Singapore has never succeeded because of geography alone. Our success has always come from staying ahead of change. If Singapore wants to remain indispensable, we must once again reinvent ourselves. Mr Deputy Speaker, I would like to raise three questions. First, how do we ensure that strengthening Singapore's transport hub continues to create good jobs for Singaporeans? Ultimately, that must remain our measure of success, not simply more passengers, more containers or more cargo, but better career, higher wages and meaningful opportunities for Singaporeans. Technology is already transforming aviation, maritime and logistics. AI is improving aircraft maintenance. Automation is changing airport and port operations. Digitalisation is reshaping supply chains. Residents understand that change is inevitable.”
“Thank you, Speaker. I have two supplementary questions. Beyond recycling rates, can the Ministry consider complementary indicators and targets such as waste reduction, material circularity or recycling contamination rates to better measure progress towards a circular economy? The second supplementary question will be: how will the Ministry assess whether public education campaigns are working, translating into sustained improvements in recycling behaviour rather than short-term participation?”
“I have two supplementary questions, one for MCCY. With fewer Singaporeans speaking dialects, the rich heritage tied to these dialects risk being lost. What steps is MCCY taking to ensure that Chinese-dialect cultures are being systematically documented, preserved and transmitted, particularly to younger Singaporeans? The second supplementary question is for MDDI. Will the Ministry publish clearer guidelines incorporating the said flexibility for dialect general screenings and share them in advance, so that film distributors will know what criteria will apply to these films?”
“With these clarifications, I support the Bill and look forward to the Ministry's response.”
“Sir, I now turn to condominium issues and MCST matters. I welcome the clause 2 amendments placing BCA's administration of programmes, such as the Estate Upgrading Programme and the Enhancement for Active Seniors (EASE) programme on a statutory footing. I have long supported the EASE programme, and I am glad it is now extended to private estates, because ageing does not discriminate and neither should our policies when it comes to helping seniors age safely. I also support the clause 16 amendments to the Building (Strata Management) Act. Expanding permitted uses of management funds to include community-building activities can strengthen social cohesion, while allowing MCSTs to engage legal services and remunerate appointed managers reflects today's governance realities. However, I seek three clarifications. First, while access to legal advice is important, there is a risk of increased or prolonged disputes, with costs borne collectively by subsidiary proprietors. Are safeguards being considered, such as approval thresholds or avenues to challenge unreasonable legal expenditures? Second, the expanded uses of management funds may strain smaller MCSTs with limited reserves. How does the Ministry intend to ensure financial prudence and will there be guidance on balancing community activities with long-term sustainability? Third, as responsibilities expand, council members, many of whom are volunteers, will need greater support. If mandatory training is introduced, will it include practical guidance on financial management, governance and planning community initiatives? Sir, this Bill moves us in the right direction. But as we expand powers, whether for public agencies or MCSTs, we must match them with clarity, safeguards and accountability.”
“Mr Speaker, in my constituency, I represent residents across both HDB estates and private developments, from families living in Pasir Ris flats to those in condominiums across Upper Changi and Flora estate. While their housing contexts differ, their expectations are the same: clear rules, fair enforcement and well-managed living environments. My approach to this Bill is guided by a simple principle. As we expand powers, whether for public agencies or management bodies, we must match them with clarity, fairness and accountability. Sir, I will focus on two areas: first, certain HDB-related provisions; and second, condominium issues and Management Corporation Strata Title (MCST) matters. On HDB-related provisions, I note the clauses validating past fees and charges collected by HDB and URA, including those arising from enforcement actions. While I understand the intent of providing legal certainty, I seek clarification on policy considerations behind these retrospective provisions. Were there legal gaps that necessitated this approach and how will the Ministry ensure future enforcement actions are firmly grounded in law from the outset? Retrospective legislation should remain the exception and not the norm. Maintaining public confidence requires enforcement frameworks that are clear, prospective and robust from the start. I am also concerned about the fairness of the cut-off date of 7 April 2026, which limits affected persons' ability to commence legal proceedings. Those who incurred charges shortly before that date may not have had a reasonable opportunity to seek advice. Did the Ministry consider alternatives, such as pegging the cut-off to when charges were incurred, or providing a short grace period? I would appreciate the Ministry's explanation.”
“Can the Ministry provide greater clarity as to when will conditions be modified, and will there be notice periods or consultation? Greater predictability will give businesses the confidence to invest and comply. Fourth, on import trends. The Bill addresses direct imports, currently estimated at less than 10%. But if we do nothing, what does that number become? And what would that mean for our overall energy efficiency outcomes? Understanding this trajectory will help us assess the scale and urgency of the problem. Mr Deputy Speaker, this Bill is a necessary step forward. It closes gaps. It strengthens enforcement and it reinforces the importance of efficiency. But the transition will not be costless. We must manage the short-term impact on businesses. We must cushion households. And we must provide clarity to those affected. If we get this balance right, we will do more than just improve efficiency. We will build trust. And we will move forward together towards a more sustainable future where everyone plays a part because in the end, this is not just about regulation. It is about resilience. It is about using what we have wisely, efficiently and responsibly. Mr Deputy Speaker, I support this Bill.”
“In a fast-moving technological landscape, this flexibility is important. Standards must evolve and new evidence must be acted upon. A rigid system quickly becomes outdated. A flexible one stays relevant. This is a practical and forward-looking move. Third, clause 16 on advertisements. Rules shape behaviour, but so does information. If advertisements mislead, consumers cannot make informed choices. If they are accurate, they reinforce the policy intent. Clear and consistent messaging matters. This provision helps align consumer behaviour with our energy goals. Mr Deputy Speaker, as such, I support the direction of the Bill, but I have several clarifications. First, on business impact. Compliance is not cost-free. Firms, especially SMEs, may need to upgrade equipment or change processes. While I appreciate that the overall life-cycle cost is potentially lower, there are real, upfront costs. Can the Ministry elaborate on whether there will be more targeted support, transitional assistance, or differentiated timelines beyond the current scheme for smaller firms? We should avoid a situation where the burden falls disproportionately on those least able to bear it, especially in this business climate. Second, on cost pass-through. Higher compliance costs may be passed on to consumers, and this is a real risk. At a time of cost pressures, households will feel this. Has the Ministry sized this impact? And if substantial, how does the Ministry intend to mitigate this and ensure that the transition remains fair and inclusive? Third, on regulatory certainty. Yes, clause 7 gives flexibility, but flexibility can also create uncertainty. Businesses need clarity to plan investments.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, recent global developments remind us of a simple truth: energy is not just an economic input, it is matter of national resilience and survival. Conflicts, such as the Iran War, shows how quickly supply and prices can be disrupted. For Singapore, with no natural resources and heavy reliance on energy imports, that risk is real and immediate. I also speak from experience working in an energy generation firm. Every day, we push to produce energy more efficiently and in ways that are cleaner and more cost effective. But supply is only half the equation. Demand matters just as much. Previously in this House, I raised concerns about water loss, because every drop counts. The same applies here: every electron counts. Energy efficiency is not a technical detail. It is a national imperative. Against this backdrop, this Bill is timely and necessary. It strengthens one of the most practical levers we have – using less energy and using it more efficiently. Sir, I will highlight three strengths of the Energy Conservation (Amendment) Bill. First, clause 5. This is a significant shift. Instead of focusing only on traditional suppliers, the Bill targets the party making the prohibited supply and this matters. Today, purchasing patterns are changing. More goods are being imported directly by end users, especially through e-commerce. If left unaddressed, this creates a loophole where suppliers are regulated, but end users are not. This is not sustainable. Clause 5 closes the gap. It ensures that rules apply across the board. It prevents regulatory arbitrage and it creates a fairer, more level playing field while achieving the end goal. Second, clause 7. This strengthens the regulatory regime by giving the Director-General powers to impose or modify conditions.”
“Thank you, Speaker and the Minister of State. First, I would like to thank LTA for partnering closely with me as I represent concerns and frustrations of residents in Pasir Ris and Changi, particularly on the ground where the impact of increased industrial and aviation activities is most keenly felt. I have one supplementary question. In terms of future planning, not just for the Loyang and Changi North industrial estates, will the Government review, and strengthen buffer zones and land and road use strategies to ensure that further industrial expansion does not come at the expense of residents' liveability?”
“I would now like to ask about coordination between neighbouring landowners. Under the proposed new section 30G of the Sewerage and Drainage Act, landowners and long-term lessees of coastal land must ensure that their coastal protection measures connect seamlessly with those on adjacent plots. While the intent of ensuring a continuous line of defence is very clear, implementation may not always be straightforward. In industrial clusters such as Jurong Island or Tuas, companies operate facilities with very different operational requirements and site configurations. Left purely to neighbouring parties, coordination may become complex. Differences could arise over design choices, implementation timelines or cost allocation, and these issues may have knock-on effects on the integrity of the overall coastal defence line. More broadly, coastal protection along an industrial coastline often involves inter-dependencies across multiple sites, not just between two neighbouring plots. How will the Ministry ensure that coordination occurs at the system level, so that the resulting infrastructure forms a coherent and effective defence rather than a series of fragmented measures? Sir, coastal protection is not optional. It is essential national infrastructure. Much like our water systems, power grids and transport networks, protecting Singapore's coastline ultimately requires a coordinated, system-wide approach. The resilience of our coast should not depend on isolated pockets of protection, but on a continuous and well-planned defence of the entire shoreline. With these clarifications, Sir, I support the Bill and I look forward to the Minister's response.”
“Sir, coastal protection measures are often large in scale and can involve substantial construction activity, including sheet-piling, deep soil mixing and ground improvement works. They may include elevating land, implementing polder systems and constructing floodgates or seawalls. Such works can involve substantial construction activity, including sheet piling, deep soil mixing and ground improvement works. For coastal industrial sites, these works may take place within or near operating critical infrastructure. For instance, certain power generation facilities rely on seawater intake systems and are located close to the shoreline. Construction activities in the vicinity may carry risks of operational disruption if not carefully coordinated. In this regard, may I ask whether the Ministry has considered how such risks will be managed? Would the Minister agree that coordination with the relevant agencies should not be left solely to the affected businesses or landowners and a single point of contact will be useful. Given the potential implications for essential services, a whole-of-Government coordination effort may be necessary, involving the relevant sectoral agencies alongside the implementing authorities. Further, under the amendments to the Sewerage and Drainage Act, notifications will be issued to landowners. Could the Minister clarify what level of detail these notices will contain? In the initial batch of notices, will they indicate only general areas where measures are required or will they provide more precise specifications? Greater clarity at that early stage would help stakeholders plan investments and align their implementation timelines more effectively. Sir, I earlier spoke about coordination between private companies and the Government.”
“Under clause 13 of the Bill, landowners are obligated to ensure that there is at all times a coastal protection measure for the prescribed place that meets the coastal protection measures standards. It was reported that coastal protection site-specific study for the City-East Coast region, including areas, such as East Coast Park, began in 2021 and cost $18 million. Naturally, we expect that studying and erecting sophisticated measures of a high standard will involve significant time and costs. I will like to ask broadly, whether the Ministry will consider centralising all expenditures, so that costs spillovers to consumers are well-managed, measured and not in the hands of commercial entities? Notwithstanding, I understand that the Ministry intends to provide financial support in the form of a capital grant. May I ask the Minister to clarify the scope and extent of the capital grant? While capital expenditure for the initial construction of coastal protection measures may be supported, coastal protection is not a one-time investment. Over time, these measures will erode, require upgrades and incur ongoing operational and maintenance costs. Will the Ministry consider whether support could extend to such incremental lifecycle costs, given that these measures ultimately contribute to national resilience? In addition, some coastal sites host critical national infrastructure, such as power generation facilities or maritime installations. In such cases, will funding support be coordinated across the relevant Ministries, so that coastal protection for these strategic assets can be approached as a whole-of-Government effort, rather than solely through the landowners' framework?”
“I would like to declare my interest as an employee with a company that owns and operates assets along the coastlines. Speaker, as an island-nation, the sea has always shaped our geography, our history, it will also shape our future. Today, as we debate the Coastal Protection Bill, we recognise a simple truth: rising sea levels and intensifying weather patterns are no longer distant projections, but real risks that require serious and long-term action. When close to 30% of our island lies less than five metres above mean sea level, the need to strengthen our coastal resilience is clear. But our shorelines are not empty edges of the land. They host critical infrastructures and industries, keeping our nation alive economically and quite literally, including ports, petrochemical facilities, aviation infrastructure, logistics hubs and energy installations. These coastal areas are part of our arteries and veins, sustaining us in our part of the world. And they provide thousands of jobs for our Singaporeans. I am sure we can all agree that coastal protection is necessary. The question before us is not whether we protect our coastlines, but how we ensure that implementation is effective, coordinated and sustainable over the long term. As we move forward, it is therefore important that we consider how responsibilities and resources are allocated between the state, industries that operate along the coast and future generations – in a way that remains fair and economically sound. With this, Speaker, I have a few clarifications to seek, centred around three themes: first, the scope of funding; second, implementation; and third, coordination efforts.”
“Yes, so have we studied used cases across other countries on AI use within a power sector, for example, for power dispatch, or for power generation efficiency? And in what countries did we do so?”
“Thank you, Speaker, and I thank the Minister of State. I have two supplementary questions. For successful deployment of AI in power generation, it will require engineers with both energy and data analytics expertise. Could the Minister of State elaborate on whether there are plans to develop specialised skills in AI for the energy sector workforce? The second supplementary question is, have we studied use cases across other jurisdictions on AI use within the power sector, for example, for power dispatch, power generation efficiency and for renewables dispatch?”
“By broadening support for participation in diverse sports and deepening the next phase of outdoor education, we invest not just in programmes or facilities, but in Singapore's future. Managing Shared Spaces and Sports Demand”
“Could we consider a modest seed fund to help smaller NSAs build capabilities? Could the Government play a bigger role in facilitating greater after-hours access to facilities such as schools as training grounds? If we truly believe sport is for youth development, then breadth of opportunity must matter as much as podium outcomes. If sports shape youths in familiar community spaces, outdoor education shapes them in unfamiliar terrain. I am a grateful beneficiary of the Outward Bound School (OBS), having attended the five-day OBS course in Secondary 3 and later returning for longer programmes on the Ubin Campus and the final one in the mountains of Korea. Those experiences challenged me physically and mentally and strengthened my appreciation for teamwork and nature – lessons I carried on into adulthood. I am heartened that the Government is extending OBS to every Secondary 3 student. But as this expansion progresses, may I ask, what is the next milestone for OBS Singapore? As we strengthen local access, could we also consider extending more overseas OBS experiences in a calibrated way? Exposure to different terrains and cultures stretches youths in ways sometimes our domestic environments cannot. While OBS remains a national cornerstone, continued support for other outdoor education providers, working with parties like the Outdoor Adventure Education Council, would strengthen the broader ecosystem and widen access for youths with different interests and needs. [Deputy Speaker (Mr Christopher de Souza) in the Chair] Chairman, sports shape resilience in our young people. Outdoor education builds rugged confidence and character.”
“Chairman, sports and outdoor education play a formative role in shaping the resilience, confidence and sense of belonging for our youths. I have previously declared that I was in the national youth bowling team. But beyond that chapter, my journey in sports began simply playing basketball at the community centre with my father and at school during recess with friends. It progressed to competing in bowling, javelin and shot put in school and having my Alex Honnold moments on the rock climbing walls as a young adult when I started working. What stayed with me was not achievement or the medals, but the lessons in discipline, teamwork and perseverance. For many youths, sport provides a constructive third space where they build identity, friendships and resilience. Studies have also found that youths who participate regularly in sports report significantly higher life satisfaction and lower stress levels than their less active peers. In this House, we often focus on the Olympics, major games and elite performance. These are important and we should continue supporting high-performance athletes. But if our focus is too narrow, we risk overlooking the broader base where many youths are meaningfully engaged. My sense is that the number of athletes represented by National Sport Associations (NSAs) which do not qualify for the Olympics greatly outnumber those in the few sports we often highlight. Many sports, such as tchoukball, rollersports, dragonboat and others, are sustained by passionate communities, many of whom are youths. These platforms may not carry Olympic status, but they play an important developmental role. I would like to ask how does the Ministry intend to support such sports that house and nurture large numbers of young people?”
“In conclusion, I have come to realised that good transport policies, like strengthening connectivity, improving safety and minimising disruptions, are in a very practical way, supporting the sandwiched generation and those around them, and this is what I have set out to do from the very beginning. Traffic Management”
“During the recent Land Transport Bill debate, I spoke about our Pasir Ris resident Mrs Malar Singam, who was seriously injured by a power-assisted bicycles rider last December. While regulations have been strengthened, more can be done to clearly segregate paths so that our seniors, like Malar, are kept safe. Road safety is also a concern. Along Loyang Avenue, 13 accidents were recorded between 2023 and 2025 at its junction with Old Tampines Road. Residents have requested stronger enforcement and speed cameras at specific locations. Yet enforcement remains inconsistent and cameras have not been installed where risks have been reportedly highlighted. Can the Ministry then share what alternative enforcement measures have been implemented to make this road safer? Even as we build for long-term improvements, like the Loyang Viaduct and Cross-Island Line, residents in Pasir Ris and Loyang live with the immediate costs of infrastructure works, like noise and dust, with complaints in the region nearly tripling to about 230 cases per year as compared to 2023. Real-time noise monitoring systems are already in place. My request is that enforcement be equally real-time. Contractors who exceed limits should face prompt consequences and not action only after complaints. Many residents in the area are also disturbed by the noise of illegally modified motorcycles late at night, many involving foreign-registered vehicles. How have enforcement checks at our ports of entry stepped up? And have we worked with the Ministry of Manpower to explore whether repeated violations could carry Work Pass consequences?”
“Chairman, during elections, I campaigned on supporting the sandwiched generation, promoting sustainability and empowering our youths. These causes remain close to my heart. But my residents in Pasir Ris-Changi have made me deeply passionate about something else – our land transport system. Let us begin with bus connectivity in Flora Estate, a dense residential estate in the northeastern corner of Singapore, served by only two bus services along Flora Road and one along Flora Drive, with relatively low frequency, especially during off-peak hours. On paper, low ridership data may appear insufficient to justify new services or increased frequency. But I would like to argue that retrospective data does not capture suppressed demand. Many residents have grudgingly shifted their commute behaviour to costlier, more pollutive means that worsens road congestions because they feel there is no reliable public transport alternative. My first suggestion is this: can the Ministry move beyond relying heavily on retrospective ridership data when refining bus service plans? I urge the Ministry to survey residents directly and leverage community feedback, to unlock real rider demand. Connectivity and road congestions are closely linked. When public transport options are limited or unreliable, more residents turn to private vehicles. This adds pressure to already busy roads, such as Loyang Avenue. LTA has shared that upcoming temporary lane closures simulations shows that it could result in delays of up to nine minutes. I would like to ask whether traffic planning models currently simulate scenarios where bus services are enhanced, which will help to bring down the total travel time. Beyond efficiency, we must ensure safety.”
“Water resilience requires upstream planning. Both demand anticipation and coordination. By planning ahead for cooler neighbourhoods and secure water systems, we protect our children, seniors and our future. Singapore has thrived by preparing early. So, let us continue that tradition with clarity and with resolve. Reliable Long-term Recycling Operations”
“First, extend covered walkways from high-density residential or commuter points to transport nodes, working towards a 100% coverage. Second, we should provide fundings to ensure all playgrounds and fitness stations, including existing ones, have overhead canopy shelter using heat safe materials such as tensile fabric membranes. Outdoor play for children and active ageing for seniors can then be an achievable national reality. If heat is our daily pressure, water is our strategic safeguard and I have a soft spot for any topic related to water, having begun my first full-time job as an industrial wastewater plant engineer and witnessing the opening of the first large-scale NEWater plant in Changi East more than 16 years ago. My career journey reminds me how innovative we have been as a nation with our water strategy despite limited land and no natural aquifers. Much has been said about the Four National Taps, but may I ask the Ministry to update this House on our latest water strategy, considering climate change? Has dependency among the Four Taps shifted? What proportion of water comes from each source today, compared with 10 years ago? Also, we often discuss how we obtain water, but less about how much we lose. May I ask what Singapore's recorded water loss rate is over the past two years and how it compares internationally? I have received reports from the Management Corporations Strata Title (MCSTs) I care for about burst pipes, suspected to be linked to nearby national construction projects. What safeguards has the Ministry done to prevent infrastructure damage and reduce non-revenue water loss? Water resiliency is not only about diversifying supply. It is also about protecting every drop that we produce. Chairman, heat resilience requires upstream design.”
“I would like to first declare that I have been an employee for an energy and utilities company that operates industrial wastewater and NEWater assets. Chairman, heat and water shapes our national conversation. One presses upon us daily. The other sustains us silently. Heat shapes how our children play, how seniors exercise and how workers commute. Water underpins every household, hawker centre, hospital and industry. These are not abstract matters and these are daily realities affecting comfort, health and economic resilience. The Government has done well through the National Heat Resilience Strategy which manifests in country-wide manuals like the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) Draft Master Plan 2025 to tackle urban heat and mandatory water recycling for water-intensive projects from 2024 to enhance water resiliency. But more can be done and I will first speak on heat resiliency, then water resiliency. Singapore's mean surface air temperature has risen about 0.25°C per decade between 1948 and 2024, roughly double the rate of global warming. We now face days constantly above 34°C and warmer nights. Heat affects sleep, productivity and long-term health. Children dehydrate faster and regulate body temperature less effectively. Seniors face risks of heat stress, cardiovascular strain and hospitalisation. This is not merely discomfort. It is a liveability issue. I would like to ask how the Ministry is working with MND, the Ministry of Transport (MOT) and other agencies to strengthen the whole-of-Government heat adaptation plan. What novel solutions is the Ministry studying? Is the Government focused on cool pavements, reflective materials and putting data-driven heat mapping for vulnerable estates to good use? I would like to offer a proposal.”
“Thank you, Speaker, and thank you to the Senior Parliamentary Secretary. I have two supplementary questions. Has the Ministry studied the correlation between flexible results-oriented work models with productivity? And second, this question honestly was inspired by one of my residents who work for the Ministry. Has the Government, for public servants, demonstrated a work performance management system that weighs heavily on outcomes rather than time spent at work, meaning a Government-led work performance management system?”
“Chairman, in my work, I have witnessed how Singapore companies were able to operate confidently in ASEAN markets and collaborate on mutually beneficial platforms like the ASEAN Power Grid. This has been underpinned by diplomatic trust and strong government-to-government ties carefully nurtured over time through MFA's steady work. In today's fragmented world, ASEAN is more important than ever to Singapore. As a small state, our resilience and strategic relevance are strengthened when ASEAN remains cohesive and central. May I ask the Minister to share more about the latest in Singapore's ASEAN diplomatic strategy? Are there other regions besides ASEAN where we can replicate this cohesive diplomatic framework with? Personally, I believe we should institutionalise leadership networks so trust endures beyond personalities, strengthen ASEAN's crisis coordination for faster collective responses and reinforce ASEAN's credibility in wider regional and global platforms. Diplomacy may not always be visible, but its dividends are real. In uncertain times, we must double down on steady principled engagement. For Singapore, that begins and remains anchored in ASEAN. Mr Chairman, hon Member Hazlina spoke about the mighty red dot. At this point, I would like to make a book recommendation called "The Not So Little Red Dot" to everyone. I received this as a Christmas gift. Not quite done with it yet, but so far, it has been a fascinating read of Singapore's 60 years of diplomacy journey. Relevance of ASEAN and Its Implications”
“While Shared Parental Leave has improved, structured support mostly ends after the first year, yet caregiving demands grow as families expand. In my view, flexible work arrangement is not the right solution. While they may seem convenient on paper, for parents juggling childcare at home, they often prove impractical. Countries like Germany and Sweden offer substantial flexible parental leave over several years, recognising the support must extend beyond infancy and adapt to families with multiple children. Singapore could consider incremental steps increasing childcare leave during preschool years, especially the first year when illness is most frequent. Extending the concept of Shared Parental Leave beyond 12 months and a flexible childcare leave bank across multiple years to support multiple children and key school transitions. When parents feel support be beyond their first, they are more likely to have a second or third child. Flexible ongoing leave is not just compassion. It is a pro-family, pro-fertility policy. If we build this continuum of care, we send a clear message for those who aspire to parenthood that Singapore stands firmly with them, not only at birth, but throughout the journey.”
“Singapore could take a calibrated approach by subsidising early fertility health screening for both men and women at key life stages and integrating fertility education into public health efforts, like HealthierSG or workplace programmes. Reducing involuntary childlessness and delayed fertility discovery directly helps couples have their first child. Miscarriage is more common than many realise yet often suffered in silence. A 2022 KKH study found 15 to 20% of recorded pregnancies ended in miscarriages. I have experienced this loss, twice, myself and many people I have spoken to have shared stories of grief, guilt and uncertainty about trying again. Structured support is critical if we want couples to continue, or for some, start their parenthood journey. Other countries provide good examples. India offers six weeks paid leave after miscarriage and the UK has amended its Employment Rights Bill for bereavement leave after a pregnancy loss before 24 weeks. The UK, France and New Zealand offer access to hospital, based bereavement, midwives and mental health support. Singapore could consider a dedicated miscarriage recovery leave entitlement, automatic referral pathways for counselling support, clear workplace guidelines to support employees experiencing pregnancy loss. Supporting couples through miscarriages is not only compassionate, it increases the likelihood that they feel emotionally ready to try again. Even when couples have a child, many hesitate to have a second or third. The concern is not desire, but sustainability of their everyday life. Children do not fall ill in sync, and families juggle staggered school calendars. Preschool children are especially vulnerable in their first year, falling sick frequently, adding pressure on working parents.”
“Mr Chairman, Singapore's TFR remains below one. If we are serious about reversing this trend, we must strengthen the entire parenthood journey from preparing for conception to supporting couples through setbacks like miscarriages, to giving families the confidence to have more than one child. I speak not only from policy discussions, but from lived experience. I personally journeyed through trying to conceive, experiencing loss and navigating childcare while working. I also draw deeply from conversations with Pasir Ris-Changi residents and fellow parents who shared candidly about their hopes and anxieties. I want to acknowledge that the Government has done very well in supporting parents during the first year after a child is born through additional maternity leave, introducing paternity and shared paternal leave, parental leave and early child support schemes. I will speak on three areas: pre-, post- and a child's first year. First, on fertility support; second, support after miscarriage; and third, childcare leave. The first two addresses why some couples struggle to have their first child and the third affects whether they go on to have more. If we want to improve TFR, we must start upstream. Many couples discover fertility challenges only after years of trying when options are limited and emotional strain is high, especially since marriages are now happening later in life. Currently, subsidised fertility testing is largely limited to medically indicated cases. Could we adopt a preventive public health approach? Countries like Denmark invest heavily in fertility education and subsidised treatment as part of a national demographic strategy.”
“It is my hope that in this Budget and beyond, we will commit to supporting the sandwich generation – those holding up both the past and the future; securing a sustainable future – for ourselves and our children; standing with every Singaporean – especially those whose voices are softer. And that is what this Budget must ultimately build. Thank you, Sir, and I support the Budget.”
“Finally, Sir, we must stand with every Singaporean – including those whose numbers are small, whose voices are quieter, but whose needs are real. There are residents in areas with limited bus services, such as parts of Flora estate and Upper Changi – the last residential estate in the north-eastern part of the country. Connectivity shapes opportunity and so, we should continue refining route design to better serve such pockets. There are families with special needs children who face a cliff at age 18, when school-based structures fall away. Transitions must be smoother. As our population greys, there are seniors asking for safer pedestrian paths and more pedestrian-only zones. We should consider designing walkability and safety not for the average 30-year-old, but for the 75-year-old with slower reflexes. There are private property owners subject to a 15-month wait-out period before purchasing resale HDB flats even when they may have legitimate reasons for needing to right-size quickly. There are the SMEs that employ 70% of our workforce yet struggle even as we push ahead with AI adoption and digital transformation. Individually small, collectively, they form the backbone of our economy. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, allow me some lines in Mandarin. (In Mandarin): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Similarly, the residents and businesses on Pulau Ubin pay electricity bills that are far higher than ordinary household users on the mainland. They may be few in number, but they are Singaporeans just like us and their problems equally deserve our attention and concern. (In English): Each group may not represent a majority. But together, they represent Singapore. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, a surplus gives us strength, but strength must be channelled with purpose.”
“And for this reason, the Government must not leave long-term energy security to the whims of market forces. I also welcome diversification of our energy mix in geothermal, hydrogen systems and even advanced nuclear technology. But public acceptance for these will be key. Public education must begin early and be transparent. Conviction must accompany ambition. Diversifying our energy mix – through natural gas, solar, regional power imports, low-carbon solutions and potentially nuclear energy – is paramount to the survival and resilience of Singapore. Yet this transformation cannot be driven by market forces alone. It requires a deeper and more deliberate partnership between Government and industry. We must establish enabling regulations, dedicated funding mechanisms and a robust ecosystem of technology providers, project developers and reliable baseload off takers. These foundational elements are essential to give investors and operators the confidence to commit to long-term energy infrastructure. Given the significant development risks and long gestation periods associated with such infrastructure projects, the Government could also work closely with industry from the outset to address potential barriers and mitigate critical risks before they become insurmountable obstacles. When the stability of our economy and the daily lives of our citizens depend on the future of our energy system, we cannot rely solely on commercial market dynamics. To secure a sustainable future is no simple feat. We will need to work on aligning policy, workforce, infrastructure, businesses and public trust. A coordinated national effort is not optional – it is imperative.”
“But climate risks will not slow down for us. Rising sea levels will not pause while we debate in this Chamber. The investments we make today may not be fully appreciated now, but decades from today, our children will understand why we made them. On carbon pricing, Singapore already has the highest carbon tax in Asia. So, I welcome the Prime Minister's pragmatic stance that the rate will likely settle at the lower end of the $50 to $80 per tonne band by 2030. This reflects realism – balancing competitiveness with climate responsibility. But beyond pricing, perhaps more can be done. Instead of viewing it merely as tax, we can perhaps more explicitly ringfence or mandate that a meaningful portion be reinvested by companies into low-carbon technologies, energy efficiency and innovation, and not have all these funds be centrally managed. This ensures the price mechanism translates directly into transformation. This will also help boost survival rates of energy intensive sectors which are also critical to our economy and yet reduce the carbon emission intensity of their operations. On solar energy, we achieved our two gigawatts peak target ahead of time – an impressive feat. The revised targets to three gigawatts peak by 2030 are welcome. But it is also time we pivot to examine the broader ecosystem. These include examining whether our grid connection timelines are fast enough, whether we have skilled manpower in solar engineering and maintenance and how we progress our transition into a green workforce. Regional power imports are also critical and more government-to-government arrangements and government-to-business arrangements may be necessary. The Government must ensure that imports are sustainable, reliable and defendable.”
“In just under a year of serving my Pasir Ris-Changi residents, I have had many great experiences with partnering them in solving some of my elderly residents' challenges with healthcare and daily living, which always brings much relief to their family members. Many families have had complex cases resolved, from navigating care placement to assessing subsidies. We should continue strengthening AIC and find ways to make their good work even better. In this regard, eldercare leave also deserves further study. Just as we recognise childcare responsibilities, we must acknowledge that accompanying an elderly parent to a specialist appointment or arranging post-hospital care, is not discretionary – for many, it is duty. On the childcare front, I will speak more extensively during the Committee of Supply debates. But I wish to express concern, especially with regard to the cost of outpatient paediatric care. Even for relatively routine visits, expenses do add up quickly for families with young children. There may be room to review fee benchmarks or expand support frameworks. Last but not least, support can also come in ways that seem unrelated at first glance – such as transport. When we enhance bus frequencies, add more bus services, extend Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) lines and build sheltered walkways, we are not just improving infrastructure. We are returning time. Ten minutes saved on a commute is 10 minutes with a child before bedtime or 10 minutes more to check in on an elderly parent. For the sandwiched generation, time is the scarcest resource and they will need all the support they can get. Sir, on climate policy, I agree with the Government's position. Retreating from action is not an option. It is tempting – especially amid global backsliding – to slow down.”
“As far back as 2019, NTUC Income research reported that 94% of parents surveyed revealed that they were currently pressured between having to financially support their growing children and their ageing parents. The majority of these parents also believed that their children and grandchildren would continue to be caught in this "sandwich generation" trap. These working caregivers are already stretched and require more support. The Government has provided broad-based support and I welcome measures, such as the additional $500 in Child LifeSG Credits in this year's Budget. However, many of our structural family schemes are still designed to provide additional benefits only from the third child onwards. For example, the Large Families Scheme focuses its enhanced support on the third child and beyond. 5.00 pm While these schemes are valuable, we should also be mindful that the pressures of raising a family do not increase in neat steps, as the first two children already place significant demands on household resources. As such, we should consider stepping up our support even for smaller families especially for middle-income families who do not qualify for the highest tiers of assistance, but who feel the squeeze most acutely. Support must also extend to eldercare. As the Prime Minister has rightly acknowledged, we must help our seniors age with dignity, security and peace of mind. We should remember that caregiving is not only about subsidies and CPF top-ups, important as they may be. It is also about setting aside time and nurturing a supportive ecosystem of care. A perfect example of this would be the work done by the Agency for Integrated Care (AIC).”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, before I begin, I would like to declare that I am employed by a Singapore-listed energy company. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I rise in support of this Budget. Much has been said about huge surpluses and some have asked whether we may have set aside more than was necessary and that we aimed poorly and overshot. These perspectives are understandable, particularly when many needs remain pressing. However, I would suggest that the surplus can also be seen in another light. To me, it reflects prudence and discipline. When the world is becoming more contested, when supply chains fracture and the guardrails that once managed international disputes and tensions are eroding, it is better to discover we have more than expected than to discover that we have too little. In uncertain times, a surplus is not a mistake; it is a buffer. Hence, for those who disagree – we were perhaps not looking at the same target; as our bullseye will never be pure numerical accuracy, but rather, overall fiscal and social resilience. But I think what we all agree on is that a surplus should not sit idle. It must be deployed deliberately to improve the lives of our people today and to fortify Singapore against the uncertainties of tomorrow. With that, Sir, allow me to frame my speech around three "S": first, supporting the "Sandwich Generation"; second, securing a sustainable future; and standing with every Singaporean. Sir, the middle-income Singaporean, especially those caring for both children and ageing parents, working and paying the bills at the same time, they carry a unique burden that is worsened by smaller family sizes, fewer siblings share the load, and longer life expectancies.”
“I had raised this issue through a Parliamentary Question in November 2025 and I thank the Minister for Home Affairs for his response. I support the safety intent behind this requirement, but at the same time, I wish to share feedback from a resident of mine who is also a small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) operator. She highlighted that further differentiation of speed limits by vehicle class could allow some more operational flexibility, especially for lower-weight lorries, specifically for those between 3,500 and 5,000 kilogrammes maximum laden weight, whose drivers often face punishing work schedules or reactive work orders. Uptake also remains a concern. A more targeted outreach and hands-on installation support could help smaller operators comply. On subsidies for encouraging installations, I would also like to point out that the Productivity Solutions Grant should be meant for genuine productivity uplift and not regulatory compliance like this one. Using productivity grants for mandatory requirements risks diluting their purpose. Mr Speaker, notwithstanding the above suggestions and clarifications, I support this Bill because it strengthens safety while reflecting realities on the ground. At its heart, it challenges all of us to improve safety without making daily life harder for those already trying to comply and do the right thing. I look forward to the Ministry's response. And to Mrs Malar Singam, I wish you a smoother path to full recovery.”
“Excessive or opaque cost or administrative burden risks penalising genuine users. A transparent appeal mechanism is also important, especially for temporary or borderline conditions. Safeguards should protect the vulnerable and not overwhelm them. Speed limits on shared paths matter only if they are enforced. Public concern is less about the precise number – whether it is 10 or six – and more about excessive speed in crowded, high-risk areas. Any speed limit, no matter how well designed, is meaningless if it is not enforced. Several hon Members yesterday suggested permanent enforcement measures such as fixed cameras near schools, bus stops and high-traffic pedestrian areas. These are all sensible suggestions. Visible, location-focused enforcement supported by design-based speed calming is how speed limits move from policy intent to real safety. Without enforcement, speed limits are just suggestions. Enforcement aside, it is also meaningless and unfair to users of PMAs who do not have speedometers for their own awareness of the speed they are going at in the first place. As enforcement tightens, we should also support compliance. This Bill makes it an offence to keep non-compliant devices. I hope we can consider transitional measures such as buy-back or trade-in schemes that could help users shift to compliant devices, particularly where earlier purchases were made in good faith. Fire safety related to PMD- and PMA-charging remains a serious concern. Designated charging and parking areas under residential blocks, also suggested by many hon Members yesterday, could reduce unsafe home charging while improving orderliness in shared spaces. Finally, Mr Speaker, on speed limiters for lorries.”
“The Ministry could also explore further features such as alerts for flood-prone roads during heavy rain to support drivers. Mr Speaker, nowhere is the gap between rules and lived experience more visible than on our shared paths. Last December, a 71-year-old resident, Mrs Malar Singam, was knocked down by a power-assisted bicycle (PAB) near Pasir Ris Mall. She suffered serious injuries, required jaw reconstruction surgery and continues to undergo follow-up care with the dentist and speech therapists. She is still unable to consume solids. I want to be clear. This incident involved a PAB, even though this Bill focuses on personal mobility aids (PMAs). I raise it not to conflate device types but to highlight a fundamental reality – on shared paths, pedestrians bear the greatest risk when this risk is mismanaged. Following the incident, Mr Frank Singam, Malar's husband, conducted a ground-up public survey which attracted over 600 responses. The aim was not to centre in one case but to see if it reflected a broader pattern. The findings are clear. More than half feel unsafe walking. Over three quarters have experienced or witnessed unsafe incidents. There is strong rejection of fast-moving devices on pavements and an overwhelming view that pedestrian safety must come first. What is striking is that respondents are not calling for extreme measures. They are just asking for three things: clear prioritisation of pedestrians, proper enforcement of existing rules and alignment between policy intent and daily experience. This Bill moves us in that direction. Clause 16 introduces a Certificate of Medical Need for PMA users, which is an important safeguard. To work well, the process must be clear, accessible and affordable.”
“Across all four, the common thread is simple: rules must be clear, enforceable, credible and implementation is fair. I begin with illegal vehicle modifications. Clause 52 strengthens penalties for unauthorised modifications and this is necessary. Excessively loud exhausts and unsafe aftermarket parts are not minor lifestyle choices. They create safety risks, public nuisance and enforcement challenges. And in Changi, residents regularly tell me how late-night noise from illegally modified vehicles disrupts sleep, affecting the elderly, young children and working adults. By raising penalties to fines of up to $20,000 and/or imprisonment, the Bill sends a clear message – personal preference cannot come at the expense of public safety and community well-being. This need to align policy with reality also applies to ERP 2.0. I welcome the move to decriminalise missed ERP charges and treat them as administrative matters. In an automated system, this avoids unnecessary criminalisation for what are often genuine technical lapses. At the same time, accountability should be fair. Holding vehicle owners liable in all cases may not reflect actual usage, particularly in legitimate shared-use contexts such as large families. A more nuanced approach could better align responsibility with behaviour. Trust also depends on reliability. A motorcyclist in my constituency experienced a faulty On-Board Unit (OBU) that was initially eligible for a replacement. However, after a minor hairline crack was detected, he was required to bear the full replacement cost despite no major accident or misuse. This raises questions about durability standards, especially in Singapore's climate. Beyond enforcement, OBUs can also enhance safety. Existing alerts on bus lanes and speed limits are useful.”
“Mr Speaker, I rise as the first speaker today to continue this debate on the Land Transport and Related Matters Bill. Yesterday's debate covered a wide range of issues – from safety to enforcement and lived experience. I hope to build on those contributions, beginning with my experience with enforcement on the ground before turning to specific provisions of the Bill. Just a couple of weeks ago, I witnessed a joint enforcement operation conducted by the Traffic Police, the National Environment Agency (NEA) and the Land Transport Authority (LTA) in the northeastern part of Singapore in Tampines East and Changi. The operation took place between 2.00 am and 5.00 am. While most Singaporeans were asleep, officers were out on the roads, conducting checks, managing risks and keeping our communities safe. I and, I am sure, hon Member Dr Charlene Chen, would like to place on record our appreciation for these officers who work late nights, often unseen, so that our roads are safe. After I shared a short post about the experience, intended mainly for my residents, I was struck by the response from across Singapore, with many asking for more of such enforcements in their own neighbourhoods. That reaction is telling. Singaporeans care deeply about road safety, public order and fair enforcement and they expect these to be applied consistently. It is in this context that the Land Transport and Related Matters Bill is timely. The Bill strengthens enforcement, clarifies powers and responds to realities on the ground. I support its intent and direction. I will touch on four areas: illegal vehicle modifications, Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) reforms, active mobility and speed limiters for lorries.”
“Thank you, Speaker and thank you, Senior Minister of State. I have two supplementary questions. The first is whether the deposit value will be revealed over time and what criteria will trigger such a review? And for the second supplementary question, what is the increase in the national recycling rate that we expect to see as a result of this scheme?”
“Temporarily unused open spaces can be leased to sports organisations and community groups to create facilities for training, grassroots programmes and competitions. This not only maximises land use efficiency, but also lowers barriers to participation, supports community sport and allows SportSG to meet demand without waiting for a permanent infrastructure. Efficient access strengthens trust, encourages participation and ensures our sporting ecosystem works for everyone in the country. Mr Speaker, I would appreciate the Ministry's clarifications on the above matters. And notwithstanding these questions, I support the Bill, because it strengthens SportSG, supports our athletes and ensures opportunities for sporting excellence are truly open to all in a country. And to put on record, I thank Team Singapore for showing us what resilience looks like, because these athletes do not need a wake-up call. They have been answering the call of duty every single day. [Applause.]”
“I note the introduction of the spexEducation Undergraduate Scholarship, with the inaugural 12 scholars awarded in April 2025. They hail from sports, such as fencing, swimming, shooting, wushu and silat – truly deserving athletes who exemplify dedication and excellence. However, I would like to ask how scholars are chosen. How the Government determines the number of scholarships each year and whether athletes in mind sports and e-sports will be considered in the future? Will there be a clear, publicly available framework explaining how criteria are applied? Transparency here is not optional; it empowers athletes to plan their careers and chase excellence with confidence. Lastly, on making sports facilities accessible to all. Under the amendment to section 8, SportSG will oversee the management of sports facilities. Will it be able to address situations where community organisations or individuals face difficulties booking national facilities, especially at the recently rebranded The Kallang, even when they appear unused for large periods of time? Given SportSG's expanded role, clear guidelines and fair processes are essential. Access to facilities must be a right, not a privilege. In addition, I would like to raise the potential of unused open grounds and vacant land in the country being made available for short-term sporting use. In my line of work, I have seen how the Government pragmatically allows vacant industrial land under JTC to be leased out on a short-term basis for solar energy generation. This ensures land does not sit idle while still retaining long-term planning flexibility. That same principle can and should be applied to sports.”
“Their achievements remind us that sporting excellence is not defined by ability, but by determination and by performance. The Singapore National Paralympic Council plays a critical role in supporting these athletes from development pathways to high performance preparation. Formal recognition of the Singapore National Paralympic Council as a key partner sends a clear signal: inclusive sport is not peripheral, it is integral to our national sporting framework. By affirming this partnership in statute, the Bill reinforces a fundamental principle – that access to opportunity, support and excellence in sport should be open to all who have the commitment to pursue it. But Mr Speaker, I do have a few clarifications to make. First, on Council Membership. Under the amendment to section 4, membership of the Council will increase to a maximum of 25 members, up from 15, previously. I seek clarification on the rationale for this increase, as well as the criteria used in appointing Council members. In a public body with such influence, how members are chosen is not just administrative – it is a question of integrity, trust and accountability. Singaporeans deserve transparency. Specifically, given challenges unique to Singapore's sporting landscape, including the realities faced by non-full-time athletes and gaps in support for certain sports, how will the Council's composition address these issues? Will experience from countries facing similar constraints be considered? A Council that reflects these realities will be one that can make fair, informed and relevant decisions. The increase in membership numbers can then be justified. Next, on athlete support and the spex awards.”
“By recognising a broader range of sporting activities, the Bill allows our policies to remain relevant to evolving participation patterns, while continuing to uphold high standards of sporting integrity and excellence. On the expanded role of SportSG. The Bill strengthens SportSG's mandate to establish and uphold standards across coaching, equipment, facilities and accreditation. In doing so, it reinforces a clear principle: high standards are not optional in sport, they are foundational. This is particularly important in Singapore's context, where most athletes are not full-time professionals. For many, sport is pursued alongside education or employment. Our system must therefore support not just peak performance, but the whole athlete and the full sporting journey, including welfare, career pathways and transitions beyond competitive sport, recognising that only a small proportion remain in high performance sport for life. The Bill also reinforces SportSG's role in promoting physical activity across the population. With a super aged society in Singapore, physical activity is no longer only a sporting issue, it is a public health imperative. Regular activity supports physical health, mental well-being and independence among seniors. By strengthening SportSG's mandate, we invest not only in sport, but in healthier ageing and a more resilient society. Mr Speaker, I turn to the partnership with the Singapore National Paralympic Council, which is an important feature of the Bill. Singapore first competed at the Paralympic Games in the 1980s and our Paralympians won their first medals at the 2008 Beijing Paralympics. Since then, they have continued to represent Singapore with distinction at subsequent Games.”