Zainudin Nordin
Singapore
“We may end up a burden to our future Government and our future generation, but it is necessary. We must do this and, at the same time, we should also make sure that there are enough resources in the future and safeguard and manage the Silver Support Scheme well.”
“They are worried that they would just simply lose their jobs upon reaching the age of 65. They are still alert and full of energy. These are real concerns of Singaporean workers. We should look longer into our Employment Act amendments and see how we can further take into consideration some of this feedback and take care of our workers.”
“Madam, I am very supportive of the Singaporean Core initiative. But on the other hand, I would just like to understand better if all these efforts of getting the EP are making the employers' job more onerous and more difficult, and whether there is a change in image about Singapore being a friendly country for investments, and also, in th…”
“Mdm Speaker, just a supplementary question. I agree with the Prime Minister on taking time and doing this properly. I would like to also reiterate the point that Mr Lee was a giant among the Pioneer leaders and I would not be wrong to say that he was much loved and respected by many.”
“Mdm Chair, for all the resources that the Government is investing in continuous education and training, more still needs to be done to instil a lifelong learning culture in the Singapore worker's psyche. So, I think SkillsFuture is a very promising initiative to encourage working adults to improve themselves.”
“A supplementary question, Mdm Speaker. I would like to ask the Minister if the recipients of the zakat donations are excluded from the regular assistance elsewhere, or can they also tap on the national schemes.”
The complete record
Every one of 647 lines we hold for Zainudin Nordin, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 2 of 13.
“Mdm Chair, I just wanted to touch on the CET/WSQ review. I am wondering whether beyond reaching the milestone of one million trainees last year, the progressive wage system and the WSQ can be squared together. If you look at the performance of WSQ, if it is really performing and having impact on the low-wage worker, how does it square with the progressive wage that we are trying to improve for the low-wage worker? Can we get some comments on how is WSQ improving the performance of our low-wage worker?”
“Madam, allow me to touch on the topic of growing expectations and standards. Our increasingly educated labour force would desire a progressive and higher standard of employment and human resource practice. The employees of these days are no longer like those of the past who keep quiet and listen obediently. The youth and workers these days are more educated, ambitious, daring, outspoken, and a clash of ideas between generations and hierarchy can result in conflicts and requires mediation. Often, strong emotions and negative attitudes can lead to unfair practices and, worse, dismissal and loss of jobs. The tripartite efforts through TAFEP have been very effective in preventing some of the most common and standard forms of workplace unfairness. As situations become more complex, I believe we need to strengthen these efforts. Can TAFEP be further improved to manage more complex problems and grievances? May I also suggest that TAFEP enhance the outreach to other workers and less educated workers who have little knowledge about their rights? They are often the ones whom I would classify as vulnerable workers who are victims of unscrupulous employers and bad HR practices at the workplace because they do not know how and where to voice their grievances. Madam, public communication and information about the support and relevant services by TAFEP to assist are apparently not getting to them and may be even inadequate. Some may miss the television ads or, perhaps, most may not even understand those advertisements. TAFEP can consider working with the grassroots organisations and relevant NGOs to spread the message to the elderly and less-educated workers and increase awareness of workers' rights.”
“As we look at the Budget this year, Deputy Prime Minister Tharman had announced at the Budget there will be no foreign workforce tightening measures except for the construction industry. Besides managing the quantity of the foreign workforce, we need to seriously manage the quality of our foreign workforce. In this regard, Madam, what are the measures that are being looked at that can help our industries improve their foreign workforce quality? In conclusion, Madam, a few days ago, this House had overwhelmingly endorsed Budget 2014 that has a far-reaching set of planning parameters. This commendable vision that we want more white collar workers to be active in the industry but more steps need to be taken to ensure that Singaporeans are prepared for the future. What can we do to ensure that they have the proper Page: 23 skills and aptitudes so that they can pick up these jobs in the future and continue to provide a good workforce and manpower quality in Singapore? Access to the Qualified Manpower for Growth”
“Page: 22 The examples and challenges that I mentioned beg the question to be answered: what should we, as a small country, do to grow and develop quality manpower in a sustainable manner that will be able to drive the economy? I believe our strategy, going forward, must be to ensure that Singapore workers, and in particular Singaporeans, enjoy good jobs, competitive wages, and that companies are able to have a highly skilled workforce to help them grow at the same time. For many years our approach has been to boost productivity for the workers. The productivity enhancement to education and training is, hopefully, giving us the results. Are these efforts to improve the productivity of our workforce giving us the outcomes that we want? Very often, we hear feedback from our young complaining about not getting the good job, the good pay. And, sometimes, we can understand that they are also looking at the investment that they have put in over the years and by their family for education. How then could we ensure that we maintain the sustainable workforce load and at the same time providing opportunities for Singaporeans? Nevertheless, in the current tight labour market, I am heartened that the Government is taking more concrete measures to promote employment for women and also for the elder workforce. Are we getting more traction for our flexi-work schemes or are we still having challenges in the efforts to get the women to come back to the workforce? We also hear feedback about other workers who are willing to work beyond the age of 65. I believe that the elder workers who are healthy, capable and skilful should be allowed to continue to contribute to our economy without the worries and the cut-off age being put over their heads.”
“Mdm Chair, I beg to move, "That the total sum to be allocated for Head S of the Estimates be reduced by $100". Madam, our small independent nation will turn 50 next year, a tender age, compared to many other countries around us with established histories. We have come far in such a short period of time. Let us take education, for example. In 2006, there were 62,918 going to universities. In 2012, six years later, this number went up to 76,665. That is a huge jump of about 20%. Over a span of six years, the number of graduates will certainly be on the rise with our constantly improving education system and the opening of more tertiary level institutions. That would mean more highly educated people looking for employment and career opportunities. As our country becomes more developed, it will be more challenging to create good jobs and career opportunities for Singaporeans. As an example, in cities like Tokyo, Seoul and Beijing, their youth are contending with the problems of more college graduates than good jobs. Like the Chinese idiom goes, "More monks than porridge". 12.15 pm In 2013, it was reported that only 28% of Beijing's graduates and 44% of Shanghai's graduates had found jobs. In Tokyo, undergraduates start job hunting as early as one year before graduation so that they can secure good jobs in large corporations. The competition is so intense that some of these graduates went through at least six rounds of exams and interviews to get a job. These are real recent circumstances that others are facing. It is not happening in Singapore but could fall on us if we are not careful.”
“In the context of a very competitive labour market today, soft skills, in addition to technical and academic qualifications, are becoming more important and we must ensure that our youths become more competitive and competent in getting jobs. It is hoped that the Government will continue to work with community organisations to help our youths so that they will succeed in school, so that they can work harder and improve their skills and capabilities for a brighter future. We should work closely with parents, teachers, schools and community leaders to make sure that every child has the opportunity to fulfil his potential. In particular, I would like to call on those in our community who have done well to show care and concern. It is hoped that they will step forward to help in the uplifting of needy families. With this involvement and Government assistance, they will not only achieve a sense of personal fulfilment but also remind themselves that every Singaporean, rich or poor, will have an equal stake and interest in this nation. (In English): Mdm Speaker, it is clear to me that the Government is making great efforts to address the concerns of Singaporeans. Concerns about the high cost of living and healthcare are genuine and it is often heard loud and clear. It is good that the Government plans to help Singaporeans increase their earnings in the long term and in a more sustainable manner. But short-term needs and direct assistance will also be much appreciated if there are more to be given. Like I said earlier, Budget 2014 has given us much hope. It is about Singaporeans and Singapore. I support the Budget. 4.26 pm”
“With this review and subsequent improvement, I am hoping for outcomes that would result in the deepening of the industry-oriented approach of these institutions with work-study arrangements and, hopefully, including the National Service vocation, if applicable. As part of the CET Master Plan, we must continue to instil in our students the passion for lifelong learning and ensure that this could be done smoothly for ITE and the Polytechnic graduates. In this respect, I am also looking forward to a comprehensive CET progression pathway for our graduates from the Polytechnics and ITE. Mdm Speaker, in Malay. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Mdm Speaker, I am very proud of the positive developments and successes that have been achieved by the Malay community in Singapore. From the days of our Pioneer Generation, the Malay/Muslim community has progressed gradually along with Singapore. The Malay/Muslim community now must continue the good work and sacrifices that have been started by the Pioneer Generation and continue to contribute positively to our nation's development. Today, it is no longer a surprise for us to hear success stories about our Malay children topping their classes, or even in key examinations in schools. We also have more Malay professionals of high calibre – doctors, lawyers, accountants, engineers who are in leadership positions and making their own name in the industry. At the same time, I am equally proud that there are more Malays who are successful businesspeople, including those who are Page: 98 outstanding in the arts and creative fields. Mdm Speaker, the Malay/Muslim community has a larger youth base and we should take advantage of this, so that our youths could contribute positively and meaningfully to our community and our nation.”
“In Budget 2014, more will be done to enhance financial aid schemes so that all our children are given the opportunities to go further in their education, regardless of their family background. The enhancement to KiFAS and the resources and efforts of MOE to uplift the preschool sector are very much welcomed. I have always been an advocate of a more centralised and Government-driven preschool sector. Nevertheless, we continue to hear feedback of a shortage of kindergartens in certain areas, childcare places in most areas and, more acutely, a shortage of Page: 97 preschool professionals everywhere in Singapore. I would like to know what more is being done to alleviate these challenges to further improve the pre-school sector. I am glad to note that the tertiary students at the ITE, Polytechnics and Universities will also enjoy higher subsidies. I am hoping that more could be done here as parents are often concerned about their children's educational opportunities. Our tertiary institutions, of course, have done us proud in many ways. From the jewel of our education system, that is the ITE, to the Polytechnics and Universities – these educational institutions have developed over the years to be models for the region and the world. I am happy that we are not resting on our laurels but continue to improve our system. The setting up of the review committee called "ASPIRE" – the short form for "Applied Study in Polytechnic and ITE Review" – is very timely. The ITE and Polytechnics have done well. They should continue to strengthen their core focus and improve their industrial relevance. That is their raison d'etre. I am confident that this review will further benefit the students of ITE and the Polytechnics.”
“For many years now, we have been pushing the productivity and innovation agenda. Are we getting traction in the industry and also among our workers? Are we moving in the right direction? Are the resources spent on the many productivity initiatives bearing the fruits that we want? We aspire for a vibrant economy, with a strong core of Singapore-based companies and well-paying, meaningful employment for Singaporeans, too. Many Singaporeans I met share the similar aspiration of holding a good-paying job or even jobs, so that they can care for their family and their loved ones. Thus, Madam, it is incumbent upon all of us to ensure that no Singaporean is left behind in the progress that we make. I notice the proposed boost of S$500 million to the Lifelong Learning Endowment Fund. It is certainly good that we are focusing on our Singapore workers' skills upgrading, to make them better workers. Some of the key questions that we could ask: how well is the CET Master Plan progressing? Are the skills upgrading and training programmes of our workforce making the right and relevant impact on our productivity? Are our labour force and talent more able and capable to continue to attract investments into Singapore with all the efforts of the CET Master Plan? How will the skills upgrading programmes and training reduce our dependency on foreign labour? I would like to reiterate, however, even as we manage the influx of foreign labour, we must not choke the legitimate needs of businesses. I agree though that over the longer term, industry and businesses must come to accept the new reality of the current landscape. Mdm Speaker, this Government has always invested in our young and in education. Education is, of course, a great social leveller.”
“Mdm Speaker, much has been said about Budget 2014 which was presented by the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance, Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam. It has certainly created a buzz in the community and it has given us much to hope for. He had presented a compelling proposition in the Budget Statement where he spoke on how we can continue to provide opportunities for the future for Singaporeans, help Singapore to remain competitive, and for Singaporeans, young and old, to fulfil their life goals with greater assurance. The highlight of Budget 2014 certainly is the Pioneer Generation Package. Mdm Speaker, for a long time, people will continue to debate and discuss on how and what is the most appropriate way to recognise and honour our pioneers. It certainly is not an easy decision but I believe we must honour them for all the contributions and work that they have done for our country. I commend the Government for this very timely effort. From the feedback that I have gotten, it indicates that it is certainly very much appreciated. Nevertheless, we must always ensure that the implementation of this generous package would have a positive impact on the lives of our Pioneer Generation and their loved ones as soon as possible. Page: 96 Mdm Speaker, I am sure that this House will agree with me that in all that we do, we must always think of Singaporeans and Singapore. I believe this Budget continues on the path of transforming Singapore's economy. It must put Singapore on a firm road to growth and prosperity for Singaporeans. The sustainable growth that we are aspiring to is through productivity, skills and innovation. It is still worthwhile for us to continue to review and ask some pertinent questions: is this a dream or an achievable reality?”
“So, Madam, overall, I am happy to note that the many proposed changes of the Employment Act are mainly to ensure that we remain relevant to the employment and the workforce situation in Singapore. With that, Madam, I support the Bill. Page: 70 4.31 pm”
“Still, the Government needs to articulate the specific plans it has about how these Singaporean PMEs will be able to gain access to good paying jobs while they can also get some industrial and basic protection under the Employment Act. I believe we certainly have a few more steps to make to ensure that Singaporean PMEs will be the main choice of employers. As we debate this Bill today and make moves to extend the coverage of the Employment Act, it is worthwhile for us to ponder on a few basic questions, namely: first, where does MOM draw the line on which workers to protect and which to be left to fend for themselves out there in the real harsh world? As of today, the EA provides the parameters based on salaries and the role of workers in the companies. For example, the vulnerable workers are clearly protected and the senior executives are not. It would surely help if MOM can explain the principles it uses to draw the line of this protection. A case in point would be the PMEs who work as freelancers. Their income fluctuates significantly from month to month and even from project to project. How would the proposed EA provisions on salary ceiling and protection apply to them? Secondly, beyond this policy principle, what steps must be taken today to make sure that Singaporeans have the correct skill set, attitudes and aptitudes to take on the jobs of the future at the PME level? How can we enhance our education and training regimes to help Singaporeans upskill and regularly re-skill themselves, so that they will be attractive as talents for both our local and even foreign companies operating in Singapore, and maybe even as expatriates to be sent overseas?”
“Nevertheless, we also know that more protection and tighter rules cannot be the only way for us to serve the PMEs. This group must continue to remain competitive and employable. At the same time, in parallel, we must continue to adapt to the changing local workforce as the overall skills and educational profile of Singaporeans improve while, at the same time, we must continue to refine our policies and rules to care for more at the professional level. I laud our Government's efforts to moderate Singapore's foreign worker growth while ensuring sustainability. These efforts are being felt in the industry, and many employers are now giving feedback about their challenges to get workers. The question now, Madam, is how will the Singapore Government implement this judiciously so that we can secure the interest of Singaporean workers while recognising that there is also a need for the foreign workers to complement and support the development of our economy. It is definitely not an easy balancing act. With the introduction of the Fair Consideration Framework (FCF) by MOM recently, the Government has clearly illustrated again its intent to put Singaporean workers' interest at the core of its policy and this is really good. But, at the same time, we often hear "loud voices" from Singaporean PMEs who are concerned about their career prospects, aspirations and need for some Page: 69 form of industrial representation and protection. In my view, as the Government moderates the increase in foreign worker numbers, our local PMEs will still need to distinguish themselves from the competition. It is good that the education and skills profile of our locals has been improving over time and we will continue to expect them to be able to serve the highly-skilled jobs in the future.”
“Mdm Speaker, I am happy to be able to be part of the debate on this Bill. As we chart forward an inclusive quality growth for Singaporean workers, I would like to bring forth some fundamental principles which I believe need to be discussed together. The Government's commitment to fostering an inclusive society is indeed commendable. In the last few years alone, we have seen many policy shifts and strategies that would move us clearly towards that direction. Mdm Speaker, we must continue to ensure that Singaporean workers have a good share in the progress of our economy through concerted efforts by all Page: 68 stakeholders. As we grow our economy moderately, we will still need to have more workers to drive the economy. There are potentially a good number of economically inactive Singaporeans who may wish to return to the workforce and I would like to see that the Government come up with more ideas on how we can help ease their way back into the workplace so businesses can tap on some of this needed workforce. For today's debate, Madam, I will dwell a little further on the group that we often called Professionals, Managers and Executives (PMEs). Madam, I hope we can agree on the point that, for a long time, we have not put them on the list of workers who would be getting protection under the Employment Act. Similarly, we also have had quite an accommodating policy when it concerns skilled and highly skilled foreign workers. This was well and good when we were still a young economy and our labour force was still lacking such manpower. Now, Singapore has clearly changed. Our workforce is more educated and more skilful than we were before. More needs to be done to serve the new generation of Singapore workforce.”
“These illegal acts also included the non-payment of CPF contributions to workers and, of course, other violations. So, I welcome the proposed amendment to provide for increased penalties for offences and also to provide for an enhanced penalty for repeat offenders. Honestly, I am exasperated when I hear the excuses given by employers of ignorance of the CPF. The reality is that the CPF has been around for years and it is a very important component of our workers' income. Thus, I find it difficult to accept the ignorance excuse. I would further request the CPF Board to name and shame the recalcitrant employers and even blacklist them from becoming future employers. On the subject of the primary role of the CPF Board, I wish to reiterate that CPF savings should be seen primarily as savings for retirement. While there is some merit in tapping on CPF savings for housing, investment and education purposes, we must constantly remind CPF members that, for the majority, it is their CPF savings that will support them in their retirement. While there may be temptations to invest CPF savings through various schemes, as a result, we all know, sometimes these are not consistent, and certainly nowhere near what the Board can provide in terms of returns through the CPF savings. I would like to also appeal for the CPF Board to consider looking at ways to improve the returns for our members so that they can also feel that it is good for them to keep the CPF savings for their future. In conclusion, Sir, I think it is worthwhile for us to continue to remind members to think carefully, before taking any step of using their CPF savings – it is after all their nest egg that they are painstakingly building to finance their retirement years. Sir, I support the Bill. 6.40 pm”
“Over the years, we have heard feedback and suggestions from workers for the rule to be more flexible and allow for some margin of discretion with regard to the amount and also to the timing. In this amendment exercise, there is a proposal to empower the CPF Board to determine the conditions for further withdrawals from the member's account when he has attained the age of 55. Sir, I welcome this and request the Ministry to make the process of the decision to be made by the Board to be transparent and properly articulated to the account holders who are affected. Similarly, I would request the Minister to continue to provide CPF Board account holders proper avenues to appeal to the Board, if necessary, or where it is relevant, due to the ever-changing circumstances of the CPF member's life. Next point, Sir. One of the allowable uses of the CPF savings is withdrawal under the Education Scheme. This scheme has helped many Singaporeans to benefit from the savings of their parents for their education. It has always been seen as a positive use of a member's CPF savings. It is obviously seen as an investment for their children and also for the future. Nevertheless, I notice there is an amendment proposed that requires the provision for an undertaking or a guarantee to cover reasonable expenses incurred by the Board in recovering any sum withdrawn under the Education Scheme. So, is there serious difficulty to recover the funds withdrawn under the Education Scheme? That is my first question. And what is the amount that is outstanding? Who is to pay for the Page: 118 cost, as mentioned in this amendment? Sir, we recently saw the report in the media of some 600 employers who committed illegal acts by violating the basic rights of employees.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, the Central Provident Fund (CPF) is definitely one of the key pillars of our unique Singapore system. Over the years, it has gone through many changes and amendments to adapt to the ever-changing needs of our citizens and the labour force. Though the current set of proposed amendments is primarily technical and administrative in nature, it is clearly a result of feedback received, the need to Page: 117 be current, continuous review and also for housekeeping purpose. I am happy to note that the Ministry has given considerable thought to the implementation aspects of the proposed amendments. I support the general thrust of the amendments and would like to raise a few key points stipulated in the proposed amendments for discussion and consideration. Firstly, Sir, the amendment proposed to expand the scope of the inspectors' powers in obtaining information, documents or records in the course of an inspection or where the inspectors has reasonable cause to believe that a specified offence has been committed. This may sound reasonable and logical, Sir, but I would like to request the Minister to clarify and specify the level of expansion and define the term "reasonable cause", as stated. How would the Ministry ensure that there are no abuses by officers with these expanded powers? And what is the seniority level of the Inspectors at CPF – because the Minister mentioned about the difficulty faced by them – and how are the officers trained to face such challenges? Sir, as an employee in Singapore, we are also generally familiar with the current rule with regard to the keeping or withdrawing of allowable funds from our CPF accounts once we reach the age of 55.”
“Supplementary question, Madam. I would like to ask the Minister: are there mid-term or long-term plans or strategy that the Ministry is thinking about to further enhance beyond the institution? There are other Malay/Muslim organisations that are quite important in the community, be it in the area of leadership or even management. Assoc Prof Dr Yaacob Ibrahim: Madam, I think it is an important point for us to think together as a community. As I mentioned in my reply, leadership positions not only within key Muslim institutions, such as MUIS or MENDAKI, but also for the Malay/Muslim organisations are a point worthy of our reflection and consideration. Having said that, we do not have authority over the MMOs but, clearly, we understand that there is a need to continue to renew and upgrade the leadership. In line with that aspiration, with the recent funding increase from the Government for the Malay/Muslim Community Development Fund, the plan is for us to set aside part of the funds towards capability development programme for the Malay/Muslim organisations and we hope that the MMOs can tap on this funding to not only improve governance but also training for their senior management because we believe that by providing resources and opportunities for the leadership within the Malay/Muslim organisations to be groomed and to be trained, they will be able to better run their programmes and provide relevant programmes for the community. Page: 42”
“The example clearly shows how both the Government and VWOs are complementing each other in helping low-income families to uplift and there are many, many other examples to show that this is really a viable alternative to go forward.”
“Supplementary question, Mdm Speaker. I would like to ask the Minister if such a partnership between Government and community is viable, and if it is the way forward for uplifting our low-income families. Assoc Prof Dr Yaacob Ibrahim: Madam, we think that the partnership between Government and community-based organisations has enabled a lot of low-income families, not just Malay/Muslim families, to benefit from assistance that is more tailored and customised to meet their complex needs. So, if you look across the landscape, we have the CDCs, grassroots organisations, VWOs as well as community-based organisations and they play a key role in rendering the services. I think the best way to see whether the partnership has worked is really to look at examples. I have a couple of examples that I have asked my staff to compile but I will give just one example. This is the case of Mr Mohamad Rafi, aged 37, and his wife, Mdm Rokiah, aged 28. They successfully graduated from the MUIS' Empowerment Scheme in December 2012 and they approached MUIS in 2011 when they were grappling with their inadequate income, arrears and even depression suffered by the wife and childcare arrangement for the children. But because of the EPS and because we worked with WDA, today Mdm Rokiah has just completed a full-time diploma in design. So, the family no longer has arrears and is working towards the dream of home ownership. And what is more important now, Madam, is that Mdm Rokiah is now a volunteer at one of our mosques in Ang Mo Kio. When she was asked as to why she is doing that, and I would like to quote her, she said, "There are many more out there, worse off than us. We have been very lucky. I know how they feel and I hope we can help in whatever small way." So, the partnership is effective.”
“A supplementary question, Madam. I am very happy to hear from the Minister of State about the recruitment increase in nurses and allied health workers. But is the Minister of State aware about the difficulty to recruit students into the nursing courses and the allied courses like physiotherapy, occupational therapy and radiography? These are areas where workers are really in demand and in need in Singapore. I hope we will look also into ways of how to promote such occupations and the ways to encourage our younger generation to consider such careers in the healthcare industry.”
“Madam, just one clarification. Earlier, the Senior Parliamentary Secretary mentioned the new Harmony Fund. There are already a lot of initiatives out there to promote racial and religious harmony. Why is there a need for such a fund? Secondly, how can we see this fund complementing the existing initiatives and what more can we gain from this?”
“Are there plans to provide more financial support so that our athletes of all ages can train full-time, in good facilities and with good coaching support? Can more be done in terms of technical, physiological, medical and psychological support, so that our athletes can compete with the best in the world? Can more be done in training and development so that they can extend their professional sporting careers, and also look forward to contributing within the sports fraternity when they end their playing careers? Madam, I spoke about what happened at the end of last year when the Singapore National Team won the AFF Suzuki Cup. It is that kind of support, that kind of atmosphere that we are looking forward to when sports excellence is achieved. I think nothing can bring forward to that kind of connection, bonding and passion that we brought to the community whenever result is attained. So, I believe sports excellence, like what Mr Nicholas Fang had mentioned earlier, will always be something which we need to achieve to rally the people together. High Performance in Sports”
“I declare that I am a football player and also an ardent football fan, and I am also the President of the Football Association of Singapore. Mdm Chair, as we grow and mature as a country, we need to further develop and enhance the sports culture, sports industry and sports excellence. The journey towards sports excellence is not easy, especially in Singapore, where parents may not see the long-term future of sports as a career for their children. There are those who choose to excel in sports and we are very fortunate for this. I think that they do this because of passion and we should recognise that it is not easy to take the path of sports excellence. Sportsmen and sportswomen and their families make huge sacrifices, take risks and incur opportunity costs as they pursue their dream of becoming professionals in their field. The higher one achieves, the tougher it gets. The competition becomes even tougher and more challenging. In the modern sports era now, where the sports industry is a global phenomenon, to be the best in a field is even more difficult, and competition becomes larger and even tougher. To add on to this, Page: 75 the athletes are also facing other challenges, like cost of living, in Singapore. Madam, currently, we also know that everyone who is associated in one way or another in sports in Singapore, we are looking forward to the completion of the Sports Hub. I believe that, just like what the Esplanade − Theatres by The Bay did to the arts scene in Singapore, the Sports Hub will be become the game changer. It will be a tremendous boost to our local sporting scene. Nevertheless, more needs to be done to support our already small pool of sporting talent, and I mean a lot more.”
“Madam, I would like to declare I am currently chairing the organisation called OnePeople.sg. Madam, Singapore has always been held up as a successful model of social cohesion and racial harmony. But even for us, the pressures of globalisation and being interconnected with the world are starting to show underlying fissures. Our country has become more diverse. The influx of people from around the world, seeking to make Singapore their home, whether permanently or temporarily, has taken native-born Singaporeans out of our comfort zone. In some cases, particularly online, xenophobia is starting to rear its ugly head. Of course, with more people of different backgrounds, come different norms and values. Never before in our young history have we experienced such rapid change, and what some have interpreted as a challenge to the core of what makes us Singaporean. Madam, may I ask this question? Are we ready to face these new challenges? We have spent decades building an understanding, a spirit of gotong royong among Singaporeans of different backgrounds. What are we doing to enhance this spirit? How are we strengthening the bonds of friendship among Singaporeans, and between Singaporeans and foreigners who are in our country? If we do not quickly address these issues, and allocate the necessary resources, energy and talent, we face the danger of ripping apart the social fabric that we have carefully weaved over the years. And that would be a tragedy, Madam, because it would take away a unique selling point that makes Singapore a choice destination for many, and more importantly, it would change Singapore forever from being a place that is great for Singaporeans and our future generations.”
“I take the Member's point that we need to continue to do this more religiously because we need to be able to understand the effectiveness of the programme which MENDAKI is now putting in place across the board for all our other programmes. On the first question about how MTS can do better in terms of reaching the high end, the bulk of the students that attend our MTS classes are really from the middle and the lower end, which is really our target. We want to reach to those who are actually at the bottom 30% or 40% to try and lift them up. For the students who are doing well, there are various other programmes. For example, there is a programme conducted by MENDAKI club for our top 10% students who have done well in the PSLE. Ultimately, Madam, my own personal belief is not about MENDAKI or MUIS. If our kids were doing well, I would urge their parents to look into the children's performance and development because there are many new opportunities in Singapore. For example, our schools offer many opportunities for personal development, not only in terms of CIP hours but also other involvement including camps and overseas attachments. A good example that I might cite is Page: 22 the University Scholars Programme in NUS, in which many Malay/Muslim students from bright and talented, have been able to seize this opportunity and gone to Silicon Valley – Ibnur, whom I mentioned, earlier is one such talent – on their own, understanding what it needs to be part of the USP and seizing those opportunities.”
“Two points of clarification, Madam. I just wanted to ask further about the MTS. The MTS has gone through several changes and review, and upgrading. I would like to know what more can be done to the MTS to make it even better and more effective especially as Page: 21 MTS focuses on helping the kids to improve, what more can we do at the higher end? Is there any way for us to push the students further in line with the talent development programme that we have? The other question is: does the Minister or MENDAKI or any of the Malay/Muslim organisations carry out regular longitudinal studies to ensure the kind of progress and development that we have gone through are properly monitored over the years to ensure that we understand what is happening? Assoc Prof Dr Yaacob Ibrahim: Madam, on the second question, we do get data from the Government for every performance every year at each of the terminal exams – PSLE, "O" level, "A" level. This, of course, is disclosed by MOE every year but we work together with the Ministry to understand better the trends of the performance of the Malay/Muslim students. Internally, MENDAKI also tracks our programme participants. For example, we have students who are participating in our Maths specialised programmes, such as ROPE. It is a specialised programme done in school. It is a school-based programme to help the Malay kids overcome the Maths challenge. We have been tracking and on average most of the students who are within the ROPE programme will move up two grade points. In other words, if they were failing, they will pass; if they are scoring Bs, they will be scoring As. So, it shows that the programme is working.”
“Sir, in Malay. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Mr Chairman, the MENDAKI Tuition Scheme (MTS) provides affordable tuition for students from low-income households in key subjects, including English, Mathematics and Science. We understand that MENDAKI will welcome a bigger intake of students for the recently enhanced MTS. What are some of the initiatives by MENDAKI to cope with the increase in the number of students in MTS? What are the improvements and methods that will be used to help our students strengthen their abilities in order to keep up with the latest curriculum in school? Sir, I hope that the Government will provide assistance to community organisations and work with them to help dysfunctional families break this vicious cycle through education. I think that this is important; where the parents who are unable to fulfil the aspirations of their children or help them to aim higher will be able to do so, so that their children will succeed in school, they will work harder and they will want to upgrade their skills and abilities for a brighter future for their children. We have to work closely with the parents, teachers, schools and community leaders to make sure that every child has the opportunity to fulfil his or her potential through education. I would like to ask, does the Government intend to provide more help and more resources to self-help groups like MENDAKI and others in this year's Budget? Tertiary Tuition Fee Subsidy (TTFS)”
“Thank you, Mr Chairman. Sir, first allow me to thank Acting Minister Tan Chuan-Jin, Minister of State Dr Amy Khor and Senior Parliamentary Secretary Hawazi Daipi for their answers and patience in attending to all our concerns and feedback. Sir, we need to be fully aware of our workers who are facing real challenges in this current economic climate and they will be likely affected by the restructuring of our economy. Our workers are at the heart of our economy and they should be treated with a caring heart. I am reassured by the focus of the Ministry of Manpower on our Singapore core, from low-wage workers to PMEs. This is very important, Sir. With that, I beg leave to withdraw my amendment. [(proc text) Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. (proc text)] [(proc text) The sum of $1,228,156,700 for Head S ordered to stand part of the Main Estimates. (proc text)] [(proc text) The sum of $39,682,300 for Head S ordered to stand part of the Development Estimates. (proc text)]”
“Sir, just two points of clarification. First, the Acting Minister mentioned about facing squarely the issues of complaints on problems faced by PMEs on discrimination. I would just like to know how we can manage this expectation of solving the problem of discrimination so that we do not give too high an expectation to a point where people think that every single complaint is a discrimination problem. The second clarification is I wanted to ask the Minister of State how we can further enhance the WSQ scheme to ensure that it becomes a measurement for employers when they are looking for Singaporean workers. When workers go through upgrading in the WSQ programmes, sometimes their complaint is that our employers do not even recognise those programmes. This is from feedback. I hope that we can further enhance WSQ to ensure that skills are more recognised than what it is today.”
“Such measures, when applied seriously, and monitored regularly, will go a long way towards removing the perception that there is a glass ceiling for our local talent within foreign companies. Further, in monitoring such transfer of skills, we can also learn where Singaporeans are lacking, whether in terms of education, skills or even networks, so that we can help bridge these gaps, through appropriate interventions. Madam, looking at the low-wage workers, we have supported them through the Workfare schemes. But since the last major review in 2010, how can we also enhance, not only the numbers, but also provide them better ways to move up so that they can improve their opportunities to improve their condition and employability? Would there be other new initiatives to strengthen Page: 73 Workfare? We must ensure that our low-wage workers are not left behind in this positive. We also know, Madam, that the current tight labour market, the economically-inactive or stay-home mothers and elders would also be a valuable alternative pool of labour that companies could use. We need an inclusive workplace to encourage more of these Singaporeans to return to the workforce. May I know what are the plans by the Government to show that they would be interested to help these people who are inactive to come back and transit into the economy. So, Madam, I would like to reiterate the point I made last week for us to consider that, in every policy, we hold Singaporeans at the core of whatever we do. They, above all, must benefit from the quality inclusive growth that we envisioned. Rethinking Employment and Wage Paradigms”
“How can we enhance our education and training regimes to help Singaporeans upskill and regularly reskill themselves, so that they will be attractive as talents for both local and foreign companies operating here, as also expatriates that may be posted overseas? Madam, I have long argued that even as we invite foreign companies to invest in Singapore, and offer them incentives to do so, we must also ensure that there is a system for such companies to transfer their skills and know-how to Singaporeans, so that, over time, more Singaporeans will hold key roles within such companies. Please do not think that this is an impossible task, because a number of very reputable companies have already made this transition. Take the example of Starhub. When it started in 2000, it had a foreign national as its CEO. It has taken 13 years but, recently, a Singaporean, Mr Tan Tong Hai, is named its CEO. I note that many of the key staff in Starhub are also Singaporeans. This is a good example of technology and expertise transfer, and opportunities for locals to move up the corporate ladder. Another example is one of our colleagues here, Ms Jessica Tan, who was Managing Director of Microsoft Singapore, until last year. I am happy to say that she was given even higher responsibilities, when she was promoted to look after the Asia Pacific region last year. Congratulations to Ms Jessica Tan! We need more examples, and more examples of Ms Jessica Tan and Mr Tan Tong Hai. The point I am making, Madam, is that it is not impossible to develop and groom talent to take over roles from foreigners. We could call this "localisation" of management. I urge the Government to consider including the transfer of leadership among the criteria for companies to receive investment incentives.”
“First would be to ensure that the foreign workers we do bring in at the different levels will be of better quality, so as to raise the quality and productivity of our workforce. The other would be to assist companies in moving up the productivity ladder and contribute to quality growth and good jobs for Singaporeans. This would be a key area of concern which the Government has to address. Madam, we also hear "loud voices" from Singapore professionals who are concerned about their career prospects and aspirations. In my view, as the Government moderates the increase in foreign worker numbers, our local PMEs will still need to distinguish themselves from the competition. It is good that the education and the skills profile of our locals have been improving over the years and we will expect them to be occupying the high-skilled jobs in the future. But still, Madam, the Government needs to articulate the specific plans it has about how Singaporeans will be able to gain access to higher-paying jobs. During the debate on the Budget Statement last week, this House had endorsed a very far-reaching set of planning parameters, among which was that we projected that two-thirds of Singaporeans will, in 2030, be engaged in white collar jobs. This is a commendable vision, as it will mean that the majority of Singaporeans be engaged in high quality, and higher paying jobs. But logically, in the interim, while we go to a step, many steps must be taken to make Singaporeans employees of choice among employers. What Page: 72 steps must be taken today to make sure that Singaporeans have the correct skill set, attitudes and aptitudes to take on these jobs of the future?”
“Madam, I beg to move, "That the total sum to be allocated for Head S of the Estimates be reduced by $100". Madam, as we chart an inclusive quality growth for Singaporean workers, I would like to bring forth some fundamental principles which I believe need to be discussed together. At the onset, the Government must remain committed to fostering an inclusive society. May I suggest three areas of focus that are Singaporean-centric? First, we must make sure that our low-wage workers will share in the progress of our economy. Second, there are economically-inactive Singaporeans who wish to Page: 71 return to the workforce and the Government should come up with ideas on now we can help them ease their way back into the workplace so businesses can tap on much needed workers. Third, our professionals, managers and executives (PMEs) must remain competitive and employable as the overall skills and educational profile of Singaporeans have improved while, at the same time, our foreign manpower policies are more accommodating at the professional level. I call upon our Government to moderate Singapore's foreign worker growth while ensuring sustainability. We had noted that the Government has committed to slowing the pace in the White Paper discussion. The question is how the Government can implement this in the best interest of Singaporeans, given that foreign workers do play a complementary role in supporting our economic development. But I think, Madam, we should not go to the extreme of zero growth of foreign workers, like what was suggested in some circles. I believe that there are two important aspects to consider when moderating the increase in the number of foreign workers.”
“Madam, two points of clarification. The Minister spoke about the Learning Support Programme (LSP) and its enhancements, and he also mentioned about working with the community groups and self-help groups. Can the Minister elaborate on how this partnership can bring positive outcomes to the LSP? I wanted to say that what the Senior Minister of State Indranee Rajah has mentioned is quite good for the professionals in the preschool. But we also know currently that there is an acute shortage of preschool professionals to a point where the kindergartens and childcare centres are having difficulty to recruit. So, what can be done to improve the recruitment and retention of the preschool professionals to ensure that we continue to be able to grow this sector to help the young parents?”
“[Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Mdm Chair, one of the pillars of Singapore's education system is the bilingual policy. It provides access to our culture and enables Singapore youths to connect with the cultural features that make Singaporeans unique. This bilingual policy also brings good economic benefits for our country. However, this can only happen if we have bilingual education that is high in quality, relevant and identifies the latest developments in pedagogy and culture. We also need language teachers who are talented and of high calibre. So, I would like to ask MOE what are its plans to improve the capabilities, skills and abilities of Malay Language teachers so that they can continue to provide quality language education for our students in order to enhance the learning of the Malay Language in Singapore.”
“Madam, let me declare that I am currently working in one of the local polytechnics. Mdm Chair, our polytechnics offer education and training that are industry-relevant in a large variety of areas. Students can Page: 125 develop their passion and interests, and become skilled contributors in many industries. Madam, as we plan for the future of Singapore, it is relevant to ask how the various institutes of higher learning form the overall landscape of training and development for our school-leaving students. Is there a better way to make the education that our students receive more relevant for the industries in the future? Are there any longer term plans by which our polytechnic students can upgrade themselves? In other words, where does polytechnic education fit in our overall manpower development? What are the pathways by which polytechnic students can continuously upgrade, and what support can be given to them in their life-long learning journey towards a better future?”
“The Ministry of Education has an impeccable record, locally and internationally, and I see no reason why we cannot do the same for early childhood education." Today, I am, therefore, elated that our Government has taken steps to provide clear guidance and is willing to take the lead towards an improved preschool sector. But, Madam, they say that the devil is in the details. So, I would like to know what are MOE's concrete plans to improve the quality of preschool education. How would MOE work with the preschool operators to improve and upgrade their operations? What will be done to improve, upgrade and upskill our preschool professionals? We know that it has always been difficult to find motivated and skilled preschool teachers – this is a situation that has persisted for more than 10 years. When there is competition for talent, monetary rewards alone are not sufficient to attract the best talent. We need a holistic package, which includes opportunities for upgrading, advancement and, most importantly, to implement innovative and cutting-edge teaching practices. What does MOE intend to do to attract and retain talent in this field? What more can be done to improve the working conditions and remuneration package of the preschool teachers? Early Childhood Training and Education”
“Madam, I believe that in many aspects, Singapore can be held up as a great example of how education can support social mobility. Thanks to the efforts of the Government, and the strong work ethic of Singaporeans, many have worked hard, attained a good education, and thus better jobs. This helps them rise through the social ladder, and achieve a better life for themselves and their families. But, Madam, the most basic rung of this educational ladder is preschool education. More and more studies have concluded that the quality of preschool Page: 115 education is a strong factor in determining how a child performs in later school life. It is, therefore, imperative that our preschool system is both robust and armed with resources to give our children a good start in their school life. I am not talking about hot-housing our kids so that they can obtain good grades. This is not the answer. What I am talking about is to allow our children time for quality interactions with peers, and with highly motivated teachers who have the skills and passion to make learning fun and develop a child holistically. Madam, more than 10 years ago, during my maiden speech as a Member in this House, I had questioned the wisdom of Singapore leaving the preschool sector in the hands of the community and the private sector. I had called on MOE to "take charge" of the preschool sector. My belief then and even until today is simple and, that is: "The Ministry of Education can ensure the quality and standards of early childhood education and kindergartens. This is to ensure that a strong foundation is in place when they continue to primary education.”
“What more is the Ministry doing to increase awareness and acceptance of NS, and the contributions of the NSmen to Singapore and Singaporeans? Are there plans to review the NS policy in view of the constantly changing geo-political landscape of the region and the world? Strengthening the Singaporean Core”
“Mdm Chair, we do not have to look far outside our country to know that we need a strong defence force to ensure the security of our country. Central to this defence is National Service (NS). Nearly every Singaporean man commits to the defence of our country through full-time NS and Reservist duties. The compulsory service spans over multiple years. This is a solemn duty that they carry out, sometimes at risk of personal injury. They do so to protect the lives of their loved ones, and their country. It is not a small sacrifice to ensure that we can all enjoy peace and stability. Madam, we have heard calls and questions over the years from different quarters and individuals about the importance and the relevance of NS in this new world. Some had proposed changes to the objectives and role of NS. Others had even suggested that Singapore's national security policies are outdated. Page: 154 Though I had personally not served the NS, I am a strong believer in its vital importance and role. Even those who had not served NS could totally relate with the story and content of the movies "Ah Boys to Men" 1 and 2. Not to mention those who had served NS. It is something which all Singaporeans appreciate. Madam, I respect and admire the citizens who have served this country with full commitment and are selfless in their mission. I hope we can do more to recognise and appreciate the NSmen and families of these NSmen. With this in view, may I ask the Ministry what more can be done to recognise the contributions of our NSmen? Beyond monetary incentives, is there a way of recognising their contributions in a way that speaks more to the heart than to the wallet?”
“This is all well and good, and I am sure Singaporeans will appreciate all these efforts. But, Sir, I would like to signal that we are still some way away from restoring the trust that Singaporeans have given to us for so many years. Many Singaporeans that I spoke to still feel that their concerns are falling on deaf ears. They feel that our policymakers are too isolated from the situation on the ground. Sir, we risk losing the art of explaining our policies in a way that makes common sense to the common man. We risk losing the pulse of the ground and we are in danger of paying a dear price – that there will be a disconnect between our residents and ourselves. Once we completely lose our residents' trust, we will no longer be able to call on them to support difficult, yet necessary steps, accept painful policies, to ensure Singapore's long-term survival. If that happens, Sir, then Singapore will be no different to many other Page: 155 countries – where governments have populist policies to win the day, but the populace suffers the long-term effect. If that happens, then, we have failed Singapore. We must never allow this to happen. Sir, we must continue to hold Singaporeans at the core in whatever we do. And we must take pains to explain ourselves, so that our residents can see the bigger picture, and that they have a role in building the future of Singapore together. And most importantly, we must make every effort to understand and truly listen to the concerns of our residents. Sir, I support the Budget.”
“We must help the parents of these families so that they have the hope and the high aspirations for their children. Whatever the challenges and problems faced by these families, we must work more closely with the community organisations to raise their development and status in life. Sir, we do hope that from the generous Budget this year, the Government will give assistance to community organisations and work with them to help these dysfunctional families break this vicious cycle: where the parents are unable to fulfil the aspirations, their children will be able to do so; so that the children will succeed in school, they will work harder and they will want to upgrade their skills and abilities for a brighter future for their children. We should work together with the parents, teachers, schools and community leaders so that every child will have the opportunity to achieve their potential. I would like to call on members of the community who have succeeded to show interest and concern. We hope that they will come forward to help with the effort to uplift the needy families. With their involvement, they will not only achieve a sense of personal fulfilment, but also remind ourselves that every Singaporean, whether well-to-do or not, has an equal stake in Singapore. (In English): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I come now to my final point. It is clear that the Government is making great efforts to address the concerns of Singaporeans. Concerns about the high costs of living are genuine, and the Government's plan to help Singaporeans increase their earnings is a long-term solution, while the credits and rebates offered by the Government are to stem immediate-term needs. We are also building more flats and are expanding our transport system – both immediately and in the long term.”
“The HDB will have much better control over pricing and thus can keep the prices of 3-room and 4-room flats truly affordable for the low-income Singaporean families. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in Malay. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Mr Deputy Speaker, I am proud of the positive development and achievements of the Malay community in Singapore. Now, it is normal for us to hear news about the excellence of Malay children in their class or in important examinations in schools. We also have more Malay professionals of high calibre – doctors, accountants, lawyers, engineers − and they lead and shine in various industries. At the same time, I am also proud of the growing number of Malays who succeed in business including those who shine in the arts and the creative fields. But, Sir, the community is still facing a number of problems, especially among the low income and the poor. If we look deeper into the problems of those families who are stuck year after year in the same situation, continue to earn low income and do not enjoy positive progress, you will find certain characteristics. For these families, that I often meet, it seems like they have lost hope, and they are resigned to their fate. If the parents are low-educated, their children often do not have the determination to succeed, or they fail in school and drop out. Why does this continue to happen to these dysfunctional families? Is it possible that these children who come from such families are required to start working to assist the family? But I feel that the Government and the community must provide more assistance to these dysfunctional families so Page: 154 that they can break this cycle.”
“Let me read what he wrote, and I quote: [(proc text) "… new flats are to be sold by HDB at cost-based prices; and priced differently depending on location. The land value is announced but is omitted to keep selling price affordable. (proc text)] [(proc text) After the minimum holding period − now five years − when a home owner decides to sell the HDB flat in the resale market, HDB will have the first right to reclaim the predetermined land value from the capital gain of the flat: the resale price minus the original purchase price. But if the capital gain is less than the land value, the shortfall Page: 153 will be borne by HDB." (proc text)] The argument in the article is that if land costs are omitted, then, the buyer could take a smaller loan and thus enjoy substantial benefits in interest cost savings. I would be interested to learn the Government's comments about this suggestion. Similarly, Sir, I would like to further reiterate my call in this House which I had done on several occasions for HDB to go back to its fundamental and core business, which is to offer affordable housing to Singaporeans. In this regard, I would like to once again propose that the HDB seriously consider regulating the sale and purchase of 3-room and 4-room flats which are originally intended for low-income Singaporeans. I have previously suggested that 3-room and 4-room flats should not be bought and sold in the open market. Instead, the HDB should take over the role as the sole seller and sole reseller of such flats. If, for example, a 3-room or 4-room flat owner wants to sell his flat, the HDB should undertake to buy it back, at its original sale price plus inflation over the years that the owner has held the flat. HDB can then resell the flat to qualified buyers.”
“Sir, I believe this Budget goes a long way to establish Singapore on a firm road to growth and prosperity for Singaporeans. It is incumbent upon all of us to ensure that no Singaporean is left behind. However, even as we manage the influx of foreign workers, we must not choke the legitimate needs of businesses and these are real needs. I agree over the longer term, businesses must come to accept the new reality, but again, it is incumbent on the Government and on us in this House, to voice their legitimate concerns and seek solutions together which can be sustained over the long term. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am told that perseverance is a virtue. So, I would like to touch again on the subject of public housing, which I brought up in this House last year. I concede that MND and, in particular, HDB has an unenviable task of housing a nation, amid rising expectations of quality and rising anxiety over prices. I am very glad that the Minister for National Development has announced that HDB will be building ahead of demand. That is really wonderful. Building ahead of demand. He also said that the cost of HDB new flats is not linked to market prices. This is very reassuring, but I am sure that Singaporeans will be much more reassured if they had a better understanding of how HDB flats are priced, whether land cost is included and how land is priced. I would like to highlight an interesting article in The Straits Times by Dr Tan Meng Wah, a research fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS). He made an interesting argument that HDB could consider charging the cost of land only when a buyer sells his flat, after the minimum occupancy period.”
“I believe we should allow companies to seek solutions to the unique issues facing their particular businesses. We must make the productivity grow our obsession and the single most important pre-occupation for the next few years at least. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am sure that this House will agree with me that in all that we do, we must always think of Singaporeans first. We are after all, the elected representatives of Singaporeans. I believe we can do more to ensure that Singapore always has a strong Singaporean Core and that Singaporeans must always come first, even as we welcome newcomers and new businesses who are sinking their roots here. I do not think anyone, either individual or company, will argue with the fact that while we welcome them in Singapore, we would also like to be assured that they will contribute to the Singaporean Core. In this regard, I would like the Government to take steps to ensure that whenever a foreign company sets up in Singapore, in addition to offering them investment incentives, the Government should also require that companies set out plans to systematically transfer knowledge and skills to their Singaporean workers. The bottomline is they must have what I would call a "localisation" plan. The Government should strictly monitor the implementation of such plans, so that over time, the core jobs within such companies are filled by Page: 152 Singaporeans. This will allow upward mobility among Singaporeans, and it will go a long way to address some of the complaints, especially among our higher skilled and higher-level workers that they face glass ceilings when working in foreign companies. I hope the Government will give due consideration to this suggestion.”
“Deputy Speaker, Sir, Minister for Finance and Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam has certainly given us much to discuss. He has presented a comprehensive Budget Statement and introduced many initiatives which will help Singapore to remain competitive and for Singaporeans to fulfil their life goals. Page: 151 The highlight of the Budget 2013 certainly is the Wage Credit Scheme, which will help many employers raise the wages of middle to lower income workers. The Government has agreed to cover 40% of wage increases of workers earning $4,000 and lower, and I commend the Government for this very generous offer. At the same time, Sir, I know that employers are aware that this co-funding is for three years, and that for businesses to sustain the increase after this period, they must ensure that they can raise their workers' productivity. Otherwise, they will be saddled with higher wages and find that they cannot sustain the increase once the co-funding ceases. In anticipation of such a situation for some employers, the Government must make extra efforts to help companies find ways to increase their productivity. This would mean that the PIC must outdo itself and productivity must be the order of the day. I hope the Government will go beyond the current models and schemes, which many businessmen have told me are too restrictive, because they depend on approved vendors or consultants. Businessmen argued that many of these vendors and consultants offer cookie-cutter solutions, which do not truly help businesses to raise the bar – whether it is in manufacturing productivity, or service innovations. In short, we must help the companies, whether they are big or small.”
“[Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Mdm Speaker, I would like to say that it is dangerous to give a wrong impression. As Members of Parliament, we will have to explain what is actually happening in the community, to give good examples. If the views given by the Member of Parliament Mr Faisal are the feedback from the community, did he bring it to Parliament so that the Workers' Party can bring about better improvement? Is this his intention? Or is it to give a wrong impression in Parliament?”
“Mdm Speaker, the Malay/Muslim community has achieved progress as a result of their merits, ability and hard work, not because of any ethnic quota or policies that gave priorities to a certain community. I am saddened by the comment by Mr Faisal that the meritocratic system has no positive effect on our community. Is he suggesting that we should have an affirmative action programme for the community? Is this the stance of the Workers' Party? (In English): In conclusion, Mdm Speaker, the Government's White Paper on Population has given cause for optimism – real optimism, but also real concern among Singaporeans. Optimism because many can see the potential dynamic and vibrant Singapore with spanking facilities for Singaporeans, where residents can fulfil their hopes and aspirations, and achieve a better standard of living but, at the same time, they have concerns because some of my residents are asking whether there is enough space and also room for them in the future Singapore. These are residents from all walks of lives who are from low-skilled and low-income families to the high-income earning professionals. They are concerned and these are real concerns. Let us work together because these legitimate concerns need to be addressed and the Government would be well advised to pay attention to these in its policy formulation. At the end of the day, we are working towards a vision where Singaporeans can enjoy the fruits of Singapore's future. Mdm Speaker, I support the Motion.”