Zainul Abidin Rasheed
Singapore
“I think much has been done as far as recovery is concerned, and the Japanese government itself is now paying due attention to reconstruction. Just at the Jakarta meeting, in fact, there was a lot of sharing of what has been done, and while they are grateful, they also look forward to us working together in terms of the reconstruction.”
“Kelp that he had met Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew when Mr Lee visited Moscow in 1970. Even though then Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew at that time showed an interest to learn from the Soviet socialist system, he changed his mind after visiting the Soviet Union and made changes to the political system and the system of governance in Singapore…”
“In my opinion, the measures and programmes to achieve progress are quite visible and numerous. The Community Leaders’ Forum network continues to develop. What else should be given attention to, especially in relation to dysfunctional families and divorce cases?”
“I found the Malay workers in the Middle East very encouraging. This is one of the best opportunities for us in this new area. Finally, the three-prong Government measure is to ensure that every citizen will continue to contribute towards the development of Singapore to ensure that every Singaporean will be given the best opportunity to en…”
“Sir, I believe ASEAN's credibility does not just hinge on Myanmar. ASEAN's credibility has been built over the years and we have shown a lot of credibility in many areas in terms of international relations.”
“As the President has said, when we take advantage of the existing opportunities through globalisation, we must also pay attention to the fact that these new opportunities should not result in a wide income gap.”
The complete record
Every one of 455 lines we hold for Zainul Abidin Rasheed, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 1 of 10.
“I think much has been done as far as recovery is concerned, and the Japanese government itself is now paying due attention to reconstruction. Just at the Jakarta meeting, in fact, there was a lot of sharing of what has been done, and while they are grateful, they also look forward to us working together in terms of the reconstruction. As far as reconstruction is concerned, we are still waiting for the Japanese government. They are also consolidating their position and to see what needs to be done. We will work closely with the Japanese Embassy here and also the Japanese government, as far as reconstruction efforts are concerned. HIGHER COST OF ELECTRICITY 9. Mdm Halimah Yacob asked the Minister for Trade and Industry (a) what measures are in place to assist Singaporeans cope with the higher cost of electricity; and (b) what would be the impact of rising electricity prices on companies.”
“– [Mr Zainul Abidin Rasheed]. Bill considered in Committee; reported without amendment; read a Third time and passed. Column No : 4692 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT (AMENDMENT) BILL Order for Second Reading read.”
“However when an extradition request is received from a non-Commonwealth country that is party to the Convention but which does not have a bilateral extradition treaty with Singapore, clause 11 of the Bill provides that the Minister for Law may issue a notification in the Gazette under section 4 of the Extradition Act to apply the Act. Clause 11 also allows this for cases where there is an existing bilateral extradition treaty between Singapore and a State Party to the Convention but the bilateral extradition treaty does not cover offences against UN workers. Clause 12 provides for similar powers as regards Parties to the Protocol and acts which are offences by virtue of the Protocol. To facilitate mutual legal assistance between States Parties to the Convention, clause 10 of the Bill provides that assistance under Part III of the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act may be provided by Singapore to a Convention country with respect to offences against UN workers. Under the same clause, an offence against a UN worker shall be deemed not to be an offence of a political nature. This is to prevent anyone from blocking mutual legal assistance or extradition on the grounds that the offence in question is politically motivated. In conclusion, Sir, as a responsible member of the UN, Singapore's implementation of the United Nations Personnel Bill and adoption of the Optional Protocol would demonstrate our clear commitment to the protection of UN workers. It ensures that perpetrators of crimes against UN and associated personnel will not find a safe haven in Singapore. Sir, I beg to move. Question put, and agreed to. Bill accordingly read a Second time and committed to a Committee of the whole House. The House immediately resolved itself into a Committee on the Bill.”
“Presumption of knowledge Individuals who are charged for the offences specified in clauses 4 to 7 of this Bill will be presumed to know that the target of his actions was a UN worker and the status of the premises or vehicle concerned. This presumption is rebuttable and only applies after the prosecution has shown that the victim or premises or vehicle had UN status. Such a provision in criminal legislation is not unprecedented. The Internationally Protected Persons Act contains a similar provision. Withholding information To prevent or prosecute offences against UN workers effectively, early intervention is critical and everyone must play his part. Having prior information of plans to commit offences against a UN worker allows our Government to intervene or take action before these plans are carried out. Therefore, clause 9 of the Bill requires any person who has information that can prevent the commission of an offence against a UN worker, or which is useful to secure the apprehension, prosecution or conviction of the offender, to come forward and provide the information to the authorities. There are safeguards for a person who provides the information in good faith, such as protection against any civil or criminal proceedings. Conversely, failure to disclose such information renders a person liable to a fine not exceeding S$50,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or both. Extradition and mutual legal assistance Sir, the Convention requires States Parties either to extradite a Convention offender present in its territory or to submit him to the competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution. Under the Extradition Act, extradition to or from a declared Commonwealth country may be effected without an extradition treaty.”
“As the Optional Protocol to the Convention extends protection to personnel in UN non-peacekeeping missions, the Bill also covers all other UN operations conducted under UN authority and control for the purpose of delivering humanitarian, political or development assistance or emergency humanitarian assistance. Extra-territorial jurisdiction for offences against UN workers/offences against premises or vehicles of UN workers A number of provisions in the Bill provide for extra-territorial jurisdiction in relation to certain offences against UN workers. Any person who commits an act outside Singapore, which constitutes an offence under the Convention, will be deemed to have committed the offence here. This extra-territorial element in the Bill affords us the ability and flexibility to prosecute any offender found in our territory if he is not extradited. In particular, clause 4 of the Bill confers extra-territorial jurisdiction in relation to offences listed in the First Schedule (such as murder, kidnapping, grievous hurt). Clause 5 confers extra-territorial jurisdiction for offences listed in the Second Schedule which are committed against the official premises, place of residence or any vehicle used by a UN worker. Clause 6 of the Bill makes it an offence, both within Singapore as well as outside Singapore, to threaten to commit an offence against a UN worker, his official premises, place of residence or vehicle used by him. Clause 7 confers extra-territorial jurisdiction for the abetment of, a conspiracy or an attempt to commit an offence against a UN worker. These provisions help to ensure that perpetrators do not escape punishment regardless of who they are and where the offence was committed, which is a key objective of the Convention.”
“The present UN Personnel Bill extends Singapore's jurisdiction to deal with specific crimes against UN workers outside Singapore. The Bill also provides for mutual legal assistance and extradition procedures in relation to individuals accused of offences under the Convention. Sir, I will now touch on the key provisions of the Bill. Definition of UN worker and UN operation Clause 3 of the Bill defines who is a "UN worker" in accordance with Article 1 of the Convention. Under the Convention, "UN workers" refer to individuals engaged or deployed by the UN Secretary-General as members of the military, police or civilian components of a UN operation. The Bill also covers officials and experts on mission of the UN, the IAEA and specialised agencies who are present in an official capacity in the area where a UN operation is conducted. The Bill further protects other individuals who may be assigned by the government of a State, intergovernmental organisation, or humanitarian agency under an agreement with the UN, to carry out activities in support of a UN operation. Where there is a doubt as to whether a particular person is a "UN worker" at a particular point in time, the Bill provides for the Minister for Foreign Affairs to give a written certificate affirming his status. This certificate is evidence of that fact unless the contrary is proved. 4.45 pm Clause 3 of the Bill also defines a UN operation as any operation established by the competent organ of the UN, conducted under the UN's authority or control and whose purpose is the maintenance or restoration of international peace and security. It could also be an operation which has been declared by the UN as one where there is exceptional risk to the safety of participating personnel.”
“For instance, about 20 of our SCDF officers have been deployed to assist in UN Disaster Assessment and Coordination (UNDAC) missions and Asia-Pacific Humanitarian Partnership teams to provide emergency humanitarian aid in places like New Zealand, following the recent earthquake in Christchurch, Indonesia, Myanmar, Papua New Guinea, Pakistan and the Philippines. SAF personnel were also deployed under the ambit of UNDAC to assist in humanitarian efforts in Pakistan in August last year after monsoon rains triggered the worst floods in more than 80 years of the country's history. They were similarly involved in humanitarian aid operations in the Philippines following Typhoon Lupit in October 2009, and in Thailand in the aftermath of the 2004 tsunami. Apart from our uniformed personnel, Singaporean civilians are also increasingly involved in humanitarian relief work abroad, for example, Mercy Relief, Red Cross, which may include UN operations. It is therefore in Singapore's interest to ensure that Singaporeans, whether uniformed personnel or civilians, engaged in present and future UN operations are afforded the protection and recourse they deserve. The provisions of our Penal Code by and large address our obligations under the Convention on the Safety of United Nations and Associated Personnel if such offences were to be committed in Singapore. Many of the Convention's provisions and obligations are similar to those found in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents which Singapore became party to in 2008. Thus, the UN Personnel Bill, while covering a different group of individuals, is closely modelled on the Internationally Protected Persons Act (IPP Act) that was passed in 2008.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I beg to move, "That the Bill be now read a Second time." Sir, this Bill, when passed, will give effect to the Convention on the Safety of United Nations and Associated Personnel, as well as the Optional Protocol to the Convention. Drafted in response to the growing number of casualties and fatalities resulting from deliberate attacks on UN workers engaged in peacekeeping operations, the Convention aims to ensure that perpetrators of such attacks are brought to justice. In recognition of the risks that UN and associated personnel also face in non-peacekeeping missions, the Optional Protocol expands the scope of protection to the Convention to UN non-peacekeeping missions such as humanitarian relief operations, and delivery of political or development assistance in peace building. Although Singapore does not host any UN operations, it is our duty as a responsible member of the international community to put in place measures to protect those who carry out the important work undertaken by the UN in its various missions around the world. Members can see some of the photographs on the screen [indicating ], just to add some colours to this rather grey presentation. Singapore has deployed personnel from the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF), Singapore Police Force (SPF) and Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) to various UN missions. To date, more than 1,500 of our SAF personnel and over 475 SPF officers have participated in UN operations in countries as diverse as Namibia, Cambodia, Nepal and Timor-Leste. Apart from peacekeeping missions, our uniformed personnel have also participated in various UN humanitarian assistance operations.”
“As we enjoy the goodies and assistance provided, we must not forget the long-term messages that are being conveyed, for instance, the need for skills training and looking at educational and job opportunities that the people can take advantage of. As we accept the Government's "Grow and Share" approach, we must also be thankful that the Government pays a lot of attention towards the issue of inclusive living. No matter how much the economy grows, it will not be perfect without a harmonious and cohesive living environment. This inclusive living environment should not be limited only to the issues of income and skills upgrading, but also to social and community programmes. However, this is our collective responsibility. I hope MCYS can be given more provisions in order to perform its role as best as it can. (In English): In conclusion, let me close by suggesting that we Singaporeans should see this Budget as an opportunity to Grow and Share and strive for an Inclusive Society. In short, let us see ourselves as players and contributors towards this Grow and Share Inclusive Society. Sir, I support the Budget. *Cols. 3417-3418. 12.54 pm”
“Allow me also to add that inclusiveness is not just about improving the skills and economic performance of the different income groups but also social programmes to bring about greater and better cohesiveness and harmony. Here I would like to urge the Government to enhance the good work done by MCYS and the various VWOs and religious organisations. Government should not shy away from doing more and thus increasing the resources available at MCYS and these VWOs and members of the Inter-Religious Organisation (IRO) to play an effective role. I welcome the extension of the 250% tax reduction for contributions to the Institutions of Public Character (IPC) and hope to see it as a permanent part of our Singapore charitable landscape. Government should continue to be big-hearted to those who are generous towards charity work and programmes that will bring our people as one united Singapore. Mr Speaker, Sir, allow me now to say a few words in Malay. (In Malay): [For vernacular speech, please refer to Appendix A*.] Mr Speaker, this Budget is a heartening one. It fulfills the need of Singaporeans from all aspects, whether for the benefit of the people, the private sector's growth, and, more importantly, for the lower-income and middle-income Singaporeans. We have seen from the two days of debate in the House that Members of Parliament show concern towards issues that is worrying Singaporeans, be it about the cost of living, the cost of medical bills and inflation. I believe and I hope that the Government will do whatever is necessary to ensure that our people will continue to have the confidence and self-belief to overcome any challenges that they may face. This should convince us that the Government is concerned about the short-term and long-term needs of the people.”
“British Council, Ali's employer, had bought Ali computer software so that he could do his work in customer services well, despite being visually impaired. In fact, he is now even entrusted with student counselling. Even Sharifah, his wife, has been given special software by her company, Pratt & Whitney, to do well in her receptionist work. But as we all know, it is not just about software or hardware but mindshare. The spirit must be right. I have always been impressed, and indeed, inspired by such Singaporeans. I look forward to more Singaporeans to follow such good examples of the right Singapore spirit. Another anecdote I would like to share, Sir, is Libya. We all follow what is happening now in this North African Arab country. I was there last October, and again two years ago, in Senior Minister Goh's official delegation. And in fact, even much earlier in 1973, attending an international youth conference. In the exuberance and idealism of the post revolution years in the early 1970s, Libya embarked on lots of rhetorics and dogma of exclusivity. The leader, Muhammad Gadaffi, introduced the Green Book and the so-called The Third International Theory. He said capitalism was decadent, communism on the verge of collapse, thus Islam is the only answer to the world's woes. Interestingly, the conference rejected the idea instead, asking for inclusivity rather than exclusivity. Yes, Mr Speaker, that brings me back to the Budget, where Minister Tharman had emphasised inclusivity. Yes, we will Grow and Share but let us also remember the spirit of inclusiveness.”
“Those who claim as such – the pork-barrel politics – just reflect that they do not understand the philosophy and principles of Singapore's basics for our future. Mr Speaker, Sir, before we get overwhelmed by the euphoria of the surpluses, allow me to remind ourselves about these basics. Singaporeans should not lose sight of our basics for the sake of future generations. I was glad to hear over radio this morning one listener saying that she was worried that Singaporeans are expecting goodies from every Budget. Let us not develop, she said, a "jelly fish" mentality among Singaporeans, and she said that emphatically. Let us not get soft. Sir, it is about hard work of our people, good governance, cohesive and harmonious multi-racial, multi-religious Singapore. Allow me, Sir, to share two examples of how I see these basics being translated in real life. I was at the seminar on "Wills, Islamic Law of Inheritance and Inheritance Planning" two Sundays ago. A thousand people attended, and this was organised by Barakah Capital Planners and supported by MUIS, Warna the Malay radio station, Berita Harian and Hongkong-Shanghai Bank. That says a lot about those who were interested in the subject. That must also say about people who have inheritance and are concerned about distributing it fairly and correctly. Two of the attendees were Ali Daud and his wife Sharifah Talhah. Both are visually impaired. They have a daughter in Secondary 2. She is not visually impaired and she is doing very well in school. Ali and Sharifah are two excellent examples of Singaporeans who have their basics in life right. Through their hard work, skills upgrading and a positive outlook to life, they have been given opportunities to excel, in their own ways.”
“Sir, this also reminds me about the spirit of the now famous Hokkien song which is like a Eunos mantra in my constituency which is “ ai piah jia eh yia.” (爱拼才会赢), 70% hard work, 30% luck. So, we must not be afraid of sharing when sharing is due, especially when our people deserve it. I am also happy to see the spirit of humility shown by Minister Tharman when he said, "in addition to hard and good work, we also had good fortune". Now, that reminds me of the other song about the heavens, “wah meng ti ” (我问天), meaning, you can turn to the heavens. Mr Speaker, if I may digress a bit to say that, in Eunos, many people thought that I have been singing this “ai piah jia eh yia” song too long so they wanted to change. I asked them to look for another song. But most of the time they come back with love songs. I know I love my residents and I hope they love me too, but I wanted something like the “ai piah” spirit, which is about strive, about hard work and this is about Singapore. Then they suggested, "what about ‘wah meng ti’?" So I said, "Are you sure that would be appropriate?" Because in an election year, people may think that when they ask for something which the Government cannot deliver, then we say, "Just turn to Heaven." So, that song might not be appropriate too. But, anyway, I think we know what Singapore represents. In times of hardship, in time of surpluses, we must get our basics right. This approach of Grow and Share is fair and not "under-the-belt" Budget as I overheard one Opposition member said. Neither is it right to say its pork-barrel politics. It is not Singapore style. It is haram. It is not what we believe in. The Government believes in fair and equal sharing and when it is due, we will give what is due.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, thank you for this opportunity to speak on Budget 2011. I rise in support of the Budget. Having heard two full days of speeches, one wonders what more I can say. Moreover, I am sure all present here are more keen to hear from Mr Budget than me. Nevertheless, I am sure you will agree that many of the good points are worth re-emphasising and remembering, especially the basics we need for our future. The Budget is not just about goodies. Mr Speaker, Sir, how do we understand what the Budget means? Many of the figures given can be quite mind-boggling, especially for the average Singaporean. Here I would like the Minister for Finance, hon. Tharman Shanmugaratnam, to elucidate as to how we want Singaporeans to understand the Budget, especially in the context of the long-term and short-term messages we want Singaporeans to imbibe. No doubt many, if not most, will see this as a GE Budget. Understandably, this is expected by most to be a GE year, although we can go on up to next year. There are many goodies to be given out. But understandably too, as our economy did very well last year. As Minister Tharman said, this is a growth-sharing Budget. This is after all the thrust of the Budget presented. Grow and Share. Sir, I see this Budget as a $10 billion bonus for the people. Four billion dollars back to reserves, $3.2 billion for social investment and $3.4 billion for sharing surpluses. Yes, I even consider the $4 billion being placed back in the reserves as for the people. We have to remember that even in times of surpluses, savings for the rainy day must be part of our philosophy and our approach towards life. As the Malay saying goes, "sediakan payung sebelum hujan". Better to have your umbrella ready before it rains.”
“I do not know for what reason they thought they have lost but they behaved in a way which was threatening to the security and the safety of that night. 4.31 pm”
“Should I reply in Malay or in English? My memory tells me a different story. I remember that during the campaigning period there were issues, of course, including housing, cost of living. The Workers' Party, I thought, went into the Election thinking that they had won the Election; and because of that, in fact, they had come in really big numbers to celebrate victory. So, when the votes were counted, I could see from the very early stage, the Workers' Party candidates were all very jubilant, very happy. When the counting started, in fact, they saw that there most of the slips were going to Workers' Party. But as the night went on, it became more even and then they lost. And Mr J B Jeyaretnam then could not accept that and he asked for a re-count. In fact, the results were announced very, very late that night, that morning rather. And, so, I think that it was that expectation to win – they thought they had swung the votes enough to win – but they did not. I think we were able to convince the ground. Yes, we have problems; yes, we have shortcomings; but overall, I think, the PAP was still the answer for Cheng San and for Singapore. And the Workers' Party leaders and supporters could not accept that. When the results were announced, they behaved very, very differently from a victorious group of supporters, like almost rioting. And I think they booed all the speakers and they were refusing to listen to anyone. The fact was that Mr J B Jeyaretnam also came out to try and speak. I think it was lucky that he did not. He could have made the situation worse. But I think that was the reading, that they thought they had won but they did not and they were so unhappy.”
“Kelp that he had met Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew when Mr Lee visited Moscow in 1970. Even though then Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew at that time showed an interest to learn from the Soviet socialist system, he changed his mind after visiting the Soviet Union and made changes to the political system and the system of governance in Singapore. This showed that we are ready, bold and willing to make changes if it is necessary. And if the changes are found to be bad or do not achieve the objectives that we want, we also want to make further improvements so that the system can be sustained for the long term. So, Mr Speaker, in short, we must believe in ourselves, believe in each other, make improvements if necessary; and if we are not successful, we must make further improvements until we succeed. We must be bold enough to make changes for ourselves and our country. *Cols. 307-310”
“I met many people in Tashkent who believe that the system of governance in Singapore is good. Similarly, many Singapore-made products are seen as good and its quality can be assured. For instance, we have the Management Development Institute of Singapore (MDIS)-Tashkent in the Uzbekistan capital. They did not call it MDIS but the Singapore University. They feel confident with the Singapore brand name. This is also similar with the ice-cream products that are manufactured by a Singapore permanent resident, Mr Khan Kapoor Singh, and this ice-cream is called Classic Dairy. However, the Uzbekistan people prefer to call it the "Singapore Ice-cream" because they know that the Singapore brand name will guarantee good quality and that its integrity can be upheld. I also met an old friend in Moscow who used to work in Singapore. His name is Yuri Sevenkov. He used to work as a reporter from Novosti Press. He loves to recall his time in Singapore. In fact, he remembered that he was here for six years, three months and eight days, and he was very happy to discuss his experiences when he was in Singapore. He said that it was undeniable that our Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew is the best in Singapore. I tested him by saying that we are only a small country but he said that "Even though you are a small country, your success is really huge". He really believes that Singapore symbolises a government that is principled in terms of its governance and is a government that is willing to make changes, even though controversial or unpopular, but is clearly for the benefit of the country for the long term. I also recalled my visit to the Harvard Kennedy School for a short one-week programme. I was informed by Prof.”
“We should be bold enough to change and improve the system if we think it could help bring about a more stable political system. We have seen many improvements in our political system, including the GRC, the NCMP and NMPs and I think this cooling-off period will be a good complement. Mr Speaker, Sir, all these good and bold changes could only be made possible, if there is trust between the government and its people. Changes are not often easily acceptable. Where there is trust, governments can introduce difficult, unpopular and even controversial changes. Some of such changes might take time to prove their worth. Trust is therefore critical. I agree with what Senior Minister Goh said recently and we need to enhance that element of trust. Similarly, as Mr Tay Xiong Sheng said in the Straits Times' Forum page last Friday, Mr Tay said that this is especially true for the younger generation which "witnessed a less dramatic national transformation" than his parents did. Many a time, there were life and death situations. In fact, I was almost killed in the 1964 riots. Mr Speaker Sir, may I now continue in Malay, please? (In Malay): [For vernacular speech, please refer to Appendix A *.] Mr Speaker, the trust between a Government and its people is important if the Government wants to introduce something that is new and maybe controversial. Such changes need time to prove its validity or benefits. Trust is important if the principles behind those changes that were made, as explained by Minister Shanmugam, can be accepted by everyone. The people usually believe that changes like the GRC system as well as the NCMP and NMP schemes are for the benefit of the Singapore political system. I have just returned from a visit to Uzbekistan and Moscow.”
“I showed lots of respect for my political opponents during the campaigning – I also went to the late Mr J B Jeyaretnam's wake when he passed away – but that night Mr J B Jeyaretnam appeared so unreasonable. You could see it in his eyes then, as though he could have swallowed up the whole PAP team. Although it was my first General Election (GE), the inexperienced me stood the ground, stare by stare with Mr J B Jeyaretnam. Only winners were invited to speak to their supporters, but Mr J B Jeyaretnam insisted to speak, as you could see in the photograph just now. All the PAP winning team members were booed when they spoke. Tension was running high. I thought and feared that the situation could easily turn into a riot then. When my turn came to speak, the last one to do so, I plucked up enough courage to address the most riotous crowd. After quickly thanking my supporters I spoke directly to the Workers' Party supporters and I said something to this effect: Look, we have been through a rough and tough nine days of campaigning and the people have decided. Let us respect that decision and work together for Singapore. After all, we are all Singaporeans. After that things quietened down and the crowd dispersed, but clearly, there was tension and the risk of rioting. A normal and cool campaign could get heated up and pose dangers if not properly managed. There is room for cooling off for all sides after a robust and heated campaign. I know there is no perfect formula for such situations but a Cooling-Off day will certainly help. We are not alone in this as Minister Shanmugam has mentioned just now, and Mr Viswa too. Quite a number of countries have adopted the same system.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, thank you for the opportunity to speak on this Bill. I rise in support of the Bill. As much has been said about the GRC, NCMP, NMPs yesterday and today, I will devote my comments on possibly the hottest part of the Bill, ie, the Cooling-Off day on the eve of any Polling Day. I will focus on two points: (i) The need to continue to be bold in making changes in our political system to ensure it remains stable, and yet equitable. (ii) The need to ensure that whatever the changes we make, there is trust between the Government and the people, and that they are for the good of Singapore and that the trust cannot be abused. Sir, I think many Members will remember this photograph [hon. Member holds up a photograph] that says a thousand words. This is a photograph of the General Election 1997 where soon after the announcement of the Cheng San results, there was a lot of tension. This Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) award-winning photograph explains what happened. It was taken soon after the Cheng San GE results were announced. The PAP team won over the Workers' Party candidates by a small margin of under 5%. In fact, my Ministry of Foreign Affairs' (MFA) Personal Assistant, Ms Lee Gek Kim, said she has never seen me more garang (fierce) as in the photograph. My friends will agree that seldom would they see me like that. They often describe me, in all humility, as Mr Cool. I told Ms Lee, I was being PG. Not Parental Guidance; not PC, or politically correct; but PG, meaning politically-garang. It was for good reason. We had won, after a tough tussle and the people had decided, yet the Workers' Party then did not want to accept it, even after a re-count.”
“In my opinion, the measures and programmes to achieve progress are quite visible and numerous. The Community Leaders’ Forum network continues to develop. What else should be given attention to, especially in relation to dysfunctional families and divorce cases? Apart from programmes to improve the performance and progress of the Malay community, what other programmes will be implemented to help the Malay community understand the challenges that are faced by a society living in the context of a multi-religious country? Finally, what is important is that the success of the Malay/Muslim community depends on its own mindset. The spirit of standing on one's own feet and an identity that emphasises responsibility, honesty, trustworthiness and cooperation must be given importance. *Cols. 4161-4162. Keeping cohesiveness in Malay community”
“I think the top half of the society has internalised the need to progress and to work hard to pull up, but how can the rest move along? How can the rest of the community help the members of the dysfunctional families out of this sense of dejection? Are there programmes either at the national level or through the ring of the Community Leaders' Forum (CLF) activities which are targeted to help them back mainstream? One more area which I think will be critical towards achieving inclusive growth and development of Singapore in the context of our multi-racial and multi-religious society is how the community see the role of Islam in their life. Islamphobia is still a problem in many parts of the world, but I am glad that it is not here. This is because the Malay/Muslim Singaporeans generally take a middle of the path route and have moderate views about living in a secular and multi-religious environment. Sir, what does the Minister see as key challenges facing madrasah education, which will provide the basic education of our future religious teachers? What are some of the enrichment programmes which MUIS will conduct to help religious leaders play their role effectively? Sir, allow me to speak in Malay now. (In Malay): [For vernacular speech, please refer to Appendix A*. ]Sir, the Malay/Muslim community in Singapore can be proud of its achievements. However, as Singapore enters a more competitive stage, questions will emerge as to whether our Malay community will be able to compete as well. Although there are achievements shown by individuals who are excellent in many areas and levels, there are now questions as to whether the achievements in school will reach a plateau. Are there signs that such an outcome is beginning to appear, and what can be done to overcome it?”
“One Ismail Sa'ad used religion to remind that "God will not change the fate of a community if that community does not want to change it". A Mohammad Roslan said that the community need to be instilled with a healthy outlook to life, especially a spirit for lifelong learning. A Mdm Zaiton calls on the leaders to lead more forcefully, recognising that leaders do play an important role, especially in hand-holding the lower-income group, while yet another Facebook friend, a Bob Ahmad, who is knowledgeable about the history of the rise and fall of Muslims in Spanish Andalusia and also a keen observer about current Malay issues, cautioned that it is about time that the community learns to uplift on its own efforts. A Yeti Aziz, interestingly spoke of her teacher's advice. She said "kalau hati suka, badan mau, pokok duri pun boleh panjat ", or when the heart is willing, body wants to, one can even climb a tree full of thorns. This is my favourite area where, in fact, the Malay teachers used to instil a lot of sense of responsibility and wanting to give back to the community. Sir, one area that has been receiving much attention lately is the dysfunctional families. It is a complex issue for sure. Minister Yaacob was also reported by the media as being very concerned about them. The murder of two young innocent children from broken homes must have evoked strong emotions in the community and in Singapore, and many are asking as to what is really happening in that group of Malays. Some feel as though this group of Malays have formed a sub-culture quite different from the growing number of Malays who are becoming more self-motivated towards upliftment and progress. It is as if the former group has given up or even wanting to compete in society, let along progress.”
“Whether through Zainal Abidin Ahmad, or Pendita Zaaba, a well-respected reformer, or Munshi Abdullah, Sir Stamford Raffles' special assistant and scribe, or the Malay media and Malay NGOs then, reform for the Malay mind and calls for self upliftment had been there since mid last century. But it was through MENDAKI that both the Government, Malay MPs and non-Government Malay/Muslim organisations were able to work together on a scale never seen before for this worthy cause. Progress, however, was slow at first. As more resources were put to bear, the community managed a steady but credible progress. The community started from a low base in education and economic terms. Education, rightfully, was and is still the focus. I would like to ask the Minister's assessment of the community's progress in education and whether the community is, in fact, facing a plateau when it came to performances in certain areas like passes in Mathematics, Science and English. Is the Minister happy with the progress made by the community in terms of the spread of areas of studies/disciplines in the polytechnics and universities? What about the level of skills and expertise acquired? Does the Malay community feel that they are given ample opportunities to benefit from the growing economy especially in the new fields of technology, creative works and the service industry? Are those looking for jobs still troubled by employers asking for knowledge of working Mandarin? While thinking about this cut, I asked my Facebook friends what they thought were the challenges facing the community. I was happy to note that a few of them said that it boils down to the mindset of the people.”
“Is the progress/achievement gap between the Malay community and the others, particularly the Chinese majority, widening? Are there fears among the community that they could be marginalised as the knowledge/technology/income gap widens? Allow me to elaborate, Sir. Having worked with the community for the last 50 years – from the day I prepared free Unicef milk for my poor schoolmates in Primary 3 to serving Yayasan Rakyat (People's Foundation) in the late 1960s aimed at running a cooperative and to run pre-school education, serving on the Prophet Muhammad Scholarship Fund Board (LBKM), working for more than 20 years with Berita Harian, and later as CEO of MENDAKI and President of MUIS, and now as MP – I can dare say that the Malay community can be proud of their efforts at self-help and self-upliftment. I do not think there is any other Malay or Muslim community in the world that can match that. In fact, I remember attending a rural development course in the Philippines, together with some MPA (communist sympathisers), you will never guess we went there to learn to grow mushrooms. At that time, Singapore was importing $3 million worth of mushrooms for tourists and we thought that the Malays should be taught that skill to be self-reliant. I also attended the conferences with Yasser Arafat, Nur Misuari of the Southern Phlippines fame. Freedom fighters they were, but I learn that, in fact, freedom fighting is different from managing and developing your own people. Sir, back home, we know that the Malay community's efforts at self-help did not start with MENDAKI.”
“Mr Chairman, Sir, thank you for the opportunity to speak on the MCYS cut on challenges for the Malay/Muslim community. Sir, the Koran said that "God will not change the people's faith if the people themselves do not want to change." If I may, I would also like to quote Michelangelo who once said, "The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it." In Singapore, Sir, we aim high. At times, we start small, but even when we start small, we think big. We know there are already Singaporeans who lament why we should always aim too high and wanting to be number one in this and that and that it would stress our people. The danger is that if we were to start aiming low, then we will sooner than later get ourselves stressed for having to try to keep up with others and, worse, losing out in this highly competitive world. Well, Singapore has set our sights high and will continue to aspire to scaling greater heights all the time, as we can see from the Budget too. What about the Malay/Muslim community? For a community that has been lagging in many areas, are the challenges the same? Are the aspirations in sync with national goals? I would like to ask the Minister how he sees the challenges facing the Malay/Muslim community, especially in the context of raising productivity and achieving inclusive growth for all Singaporeans. Are Singapore Malays well-equipped to benefit from the national programmes planned? No doubt, there has been credible progress made, but does it commensurate with the efforts put in both at the national level and through self-help programmes? What are the measures used to measure this progress or lack of progress?”
“I found the Malay workers in the Middle East very encouraging. This is one of the best opportunities for us in this new area. Finally, the three-prong Government measure is to ensure that every citizen will continue to contribute towards the development of Singapore to ensure that every Singaporean will be given the best opportunity to enjoy quality of life which is better and this should be accepted by all. For the Singapore multi-racial society, there should not be anyone who felt he is left behind. The Malay community should also play its role to improve its productivity and to find new opportunities and benefit from it and continue to contribute towards to the development of Singapore equitably and in a united way. *Cols. 2591-2592. 6.04 pm”
“For example, training need not be the answer to every sector, as it will also imply higher churn factor and, with reduced available resources, productivity could decrease. In the service sector, human factor is critical, where higher senseless efficiency could lower standard of service. Bottomline, productivity is more than just about tools and measures of cold KPIs. We need to target on positive work culture and a greater sense of pride in work satisfaction. That, in short, will bring about better productivity. Allow me, Sir, now to continue in Bahasa. (In Malay): [For vernacular speech, please refer to Appendix A *.] Mr Speaker, it is right for the Minister for Finance, Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam, to pay special attention to productivity. This is the hallmark for the economy which is facing competitiveness in globalisation. However, the definition of productivity should be clear so that there is no sector, especially the employers, who will take advantage of it and to take advantage of the Government's efforts to gain their profits. To ensure this step is successful, there should be cooperation and approach in unity because the effort to increase productivity is our common effort. We must convince that these measures will be enjoyed together and especially it must be interpreted with the increase in skills and wages. The measures to increase productivity by using new methods and the process and the KPIs should be embedded with the good positive work and pride to the workers. This is to guarantee the increase in productivity continuously. At the same time, I also accept the Government's directions to improve the potential of our local companies in the region. This is important when we see new opportunities which are emerging in China, India, Middle East and Africa.”
“As it takes both hands to clap, the employers and employees must act in sync to ensure success of our efforts to raise productivity. Government’s helping hand, in terms of resources for training and retraining and policy changes, will certainly come in handy. Some of the questions I am raising today reflect some of the concerns still playing in people's minds. I posed this issue to my Facebook (FB) friends and I obtained some reactions worth sharing. One FB friend asked whether Government will explain how productivity would translate into higher wages for employees, as companies’ paramount interest is to make the most profit possible and we do not want workers to feel short-changed. Would the increase in foreign worker levy be passed back to consumers, and whether the higher levy could backfire, eg, labour cost goes up but yet we still could not get locals to fill the jobs usually done by foreign workers, or worse productivity remains low? One FB friend said that productivity can be attained successfully with constant validation of the various processes that exist within any organisation or work environment. Deployment, cost efficiency and wise investment on tools or expertise are some examples, but constant policing of process flow by credible teams must be in place to ensure that we do not lag behind in our fast growing and expanding industrial environment. Sometimes, some process change might look good during implementation, but becoming obsolete or, worse, causing bottlenecks, making people lose faith in efforts at raising productivity. We must also recognise that different sectors would require different approaches to productivity.”
“Coincidentally, the former Chairman of EDB, Mr Philip Yeo, is now Chairman of SPRING and Special Adviser for Economic Development, Prime Minister's Office. Finally, so I was told, the campaign for greater productivity among Singapore workforce prevailed, as there was indeed a serious problem with labour productivity then that needs tackling. Apparently, the campaign was inspired by none other than Minister Mentor himself, our PM then. I am glad, Sir, our Government takes a transparent and open approach towards raising labour productivity. But that is not to say that we have nothing to be proud of when it came to productivity. In fact, this is one area where many foreign countries look to us for help. We helped Botswana set up its National Productivity Centre, beginning 1993. The Singapore Cooperation Enterprise is now helping Rwanda establish a Workforce Development Authority since 2007, followed by the implementation of related training projects. Under the Singapore Cooperation Programme run by our MFA, we do programmes on e-government which increases efficiency and productivity. Singapore is indeed very much sought after by our friends overseas when it came to productivity, e-government and good governance. Well, glory of the past, however, will not help us meet competition today. The challenges facing the workforce today are growing. We are, after all, as good as our performance on our last job. As mentioned by the GPC Chair for Finance and MTI, Ms Jessica Tan and hon. Member Lim Eng Hwa, it is about going back to basics. We still need to define clearly what we mean and expect of better productivity. We can show what we mean through sharing of best practices as suggested by Ms Jessica Tan.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker Sir, thank you for the opportunity to speak on Budget Statement 2010 by Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam. Sir, although it is two days after Chap Goh Mei but in the light of the Budget sentiment, allow me to first say, Xin Nian Kuai Le, Gong Xi Fa Cai, Shen Ti Shen Kang. For the benefit of the Malay and Tamil interpreters, it just means Happy New Year, lots of prosperity and good health. Sir, I support the three-prong approach taken by our Minister for Finance to bring Singapore forward, namely, raising productivity, growing globally competitive companies and including all Singaporeans in growth. Allow me to dwell on the first, plus touching briefly on the other two, although I realise that to speak on productivity can be quite tricky, especially when one has to also prove productive in this short time available. As one Facebook friend said, "Productivity is about not doing the unnecessary." Nevertheless, allow me to, first, recall the days when the former National Productivity Board once launched a campaign to increase the productivity of Singapore’s workforce. The NPB now has evolved under a more glamorous name called SPRING. The campaign drew a lot of flak, especially from the EDB. I understand EDB’s predicament, especially when they were promoting Singapore very successfully as an investment destination, promising the best workforce available in Singapore. I was then Editor of Berita Harian and I served under the NPB’s Media/PR Committee, under the chairmanship of my friend Mr Toh Thian Ser, a Senior Editor of the Business Times then. I remember the hard tussle between the Committee and EDB.”
“The OECD itself has emphasised that such "fishing expeditions" are out of scope. Banks cannot serve to harbour financial criminals, but they are equally held accountable to their clients in ensuring that confidentiality cannot be lifted without justification. In tandem with the legislative changes, Singapore is starting talks with several countries to update our DTAs with them on a mutually beneficial basis, including having exchange of information provisions that are in line with the new international Standard. Other financial centres such as Hong Kong, Switzerland and Luxembourg have announced similar plans. It is important that all jurisdictions make similar moves, so as to enable international cooperation on the matter while preserving a level playing field amongst financial centres. Sir, the steps that we are undertaking in the coming months are in line with Singapore's status and reputation as a trusted and responsible financial hub. Singapore does not and will not stand for the abuse of its laws to shelter financial criminals and their ill-gotten proceeds. What defines Singapore as a competitive financial and business hub are its longstanding strengths – an open and transparent governance regime, a reputation for the rule of law, and a pro-business environment. Unlike tax havens, we are a substantive and diversified economy, with manufacturing, services and financial sectors reinforcing each other and reaching out to a wide geography of markets. We will continue to enhance these strengths going forward.”
“We decided to do so as the OECD Standard had become an internationally accepted benchmark following its endorsement by the UN Committee of Tax Experts (on International Cooperation in Tax Matters) in October 2008. In March 2009, we announced that we will introduce relevant amendments to our domestic tax regime as well as renegotiate and conclude Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs) to enable tax cooperation in line with this new internationally accepted Standard. The OECD recognises Singapore's intention to do so. It has also made clear that it does not regard Singapore as a tax haven. Sir, we are working on the draft legislative amendments and they will be aired for public consultation in the middle of the year, before we proceed to introduce the amendments in Parliament. But I would clarify that even before the endorsement of the new international Standard, Singapore has already been able to offer prompt assistance on most requests for information from our 60 DTA partners. We will amend our laws to enhance the information that we can exchange under our DTAs. In particular, the amendments will enable the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) to assist on requests from our DTA partners for information where Singapore does not have a domestic tax stake or interest in the request at hand. Similarly, our tax authority can obtain the assistance of our DTA partners on information which they do not have a domestic interest in. Naturally, any request by a foreign jurisdiction for information has to be clear, specific, relevant and backed with good reason. This is in line with the new international Standard, which allows the requested country to screen off requests that are frivolous or spurious in nature otherwise known as "fishing expeditions".”
“I think on the question of ASEAN's statement, while Myanmar has a right to rebut it – and this, in fact, was, again, discussed at the meeting yesterday at Phnom Penh with the ASEAN Ministers – I believe that, in fact, Thailand has the right, as the ASEAN chair, to make that kind of statement. So, I think Thailand is not going beyond its boundary of its role and responsibility as ASEAN chair to make that statement. Column No : 563 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (Singapore on the 'grey list') 4. Ms Sylvia Lim asked the Minister for Finance (a) what steps does the Government intend to take to remove Singapore from the "grey list" of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development as a country committed to the internationally agreed tax standard but which has not yet substantially implemented it; and (b) what are the implications of such steps on the economy. The Second Minister for Finance (Mrs Lim Hwee Hua): Sir, Singapore was placed by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) on its so-called "grey list" with regard to international cooperation on exchange of information on tax matters in early April. This is a list of jurisdictions that have committed to the OECD Standard on Exchange of Information (EOI) but have not yet substantially implemented the Standard. Several other financial centres such as Hong Kong and Switzerland are in the same situation as Singapore in this regard. We discussed this issue in Parliament in February this year, and the Government gave clear indication then of its intention to endorse the OECD Standard.”
“Sir, I believe ASEAN's credibility does not just hinge on Myanmar. ASEAN's credibility has been built over the years and we have shown a lot of credibility in many areas in terms of international relations. I think not only ASEAN is facing this stalemate, if you like, but even at the international organisation level, at the UN level, even at the Security Council level. I think we have to be realistic. While we want to be pragmatic, we also have to be realistic that we do not have the leverage to cause the kind of change in Myanmar. We need to understand that Myanmar is a country that is used to isolation by the international community and experience over the years have shown that they will not yield to sanctions and intimidation. So, I think one has to measure credibility and also value to ASEAN, not only in terms of the time – longer term benefits – but also in terms of what will we achieve if we just force the issue. Will we bring about change? Or will change, in fact, be better approached if we take it step by step?”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I do not know what direct effect we will have in terms of getting rid of Myanmar from ASEAN but I think we know there are benefits in having Myanmar as part of the regional grouping. We started off, as you know, five members, we have grown to six with Brunei, and then later on we have four more joining. So, we have all the 10. And as you can see that Myanmar is really committed to ASEAN by actually attending all meetings. Although this one area which I think is of concern not only to Singapore and the region but also to the world. We believe that if isolating Myanmar could have resolved this situation, we would have done so. But we believe that engaging Myanmar will, in fact, bring about the possibility of even getting more accountability from Myanmar. So, we believe there is value in us retaining Myanmar in ASEAN and work on Myanmar on the issue. I think we have to be patient here and it may take time but let us work on it because we also believe that while we can do it, ASEAN and even Singapore has taken its own stand, we will continue to support efforts by the international community, in particular that by the UN and its good offices of Prof. Ibrahim Gambari, to bring about change in Myanmar. Although we cannot expect change overnight, ASEAN, I believe, must continue like the international community to press for transition and change for Myanmar.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, domestic developments in Myanmar have adversely affected the reputation and credibility of ASEAN. ASEAN has repeatedly called on the Myanmar Government to release Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, which Thailand as the ASEAN chair reiterated in its statement of 19th May, expressing and I quote, "grave concern" over recent developments. As Myanmar has ratified the ASEAN Charter, it has certain obligations to human rights under the Charter. However, the question of expulsion or suspension, which often raised by external observers of ASEAN, is not as straightforward as it seems. Western sanctions have had little effect on Myanmar so long as China and India keep their borders with Myanmar open. We have always believed in ASEAN that we have more influence over Myanmar, however limited, through engagement rather than isolating it. On its part, despite frequent criticisms by ASEAN, Myanmar has remained committed to ASEAN and attended all meetings. Singapore by itself has also been calling on Myanmar to release Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and seek national reconciliation. On 15th May 2009, Singapore issued a statement expressing our dismay at the trial of Aung San Suu Kyi.”
“As the President has said, when we take advantage of the existing opportunities through globalisation, we must also pay attention to the fact that these new opportunities should not result in a wide income gap. This challenge or problem, if not given due attention, will result in harmony problems, or the lack of harmony, or even divide the population. So, while we improve our particular political system, we must also ensure that we continue to close the income gap. Competition and education must continue to be our main approach. This is especially important to the Malay-Muslim community which has long been left behind. Although for some time they have shown competitiveness and increasingly good performance, there are still a lot to chase and to work for. This is to ensure that the Malay-Muslim community’s competitiveness level and ability can be utilised to close the gaps in income and standards of living. With that, Mr Speaker, I support the motion. *Cols. 535-536. 2.06 pm”
“GRCs have been able to produce the kind of inclusive participation, very multi-racial in its outlook and approach, and I think this has made the minority communities feel very much included in the whole political system of Singapore. Change we must, but change we must not bring about a divisive political climate. We must remain inclusive and we must promote harmony. On that note, Sir, allow me to continue, briefly, in Malay. (In Malay): [For vernacular speech, please refer to Appendix A*.]Our political system, Mr Speaker, as the President has said, is not cast in stone. It needs to change with the times and current needs, just as we have introduced the NCMP system, the NMP system and also the system where there are GRCs. Through this GRC system, we have ensured the representation and participation of the minority communities in our Parliament. This also ensures that our party-based political system can be carried out with a multi-racial tone and basis. In the context of a plural, multi-cultural and multi-religious Singapore, a multi-racial political system must be preserved, and even strengthened. So, any changes that the Government is expected to bring, we must ensure that it will not divide the people and, in fact, will bring about a more inclusive situation where our harmonious way of life will continue. However, the issue of political change must also be seen in the context of how to ensure that we stay competitive, so that the Singaporeans who are left behind in terms of education and skills can continue to be given attention, and they can sharpen their competitiveness in order to close the income gap that can now become a problem.”
“So, this experience of converting the CDCs to doing a lot more in terms of providing financial assistance and job assistance had made the CDCs a lot more meaningful. In the process, we are also encouraging our residents, our Singaporeans, that while we provide assistance, it is only in the interim, and the more important aspect of assistance is actually to provide them with the right skills, right training and re-training and that will promise them a longer term solution to their predicament. In that way, they do not have to actually continue to be dependent on dole-outs and financial assistance for a long time, and they can live with true dignity. So, from jobs and bonding, what I call "JAB", we move on to "JELL" – jobs, employability and lifelong learning. We have seen, how, in fact, the CDCs have matured and played a more important role. On that note, I would like to urge the Government to give due consideration as to what kind of resources that we need to provide to the CDCs. The CDCs are now reaching out to more of the grassroots organisations and their advisors, and I think they need more resources to be able to bring about the kind of bonding and outreach that is needed on the ground. The CDCs are well placed in terms of understanding the ground better than most of the Ministries and the CDCs should be given the kind of resources they deserve. On the final point, Sir, yes, I agree with the President that our political system is not set in stone. Change we must, and indeed we have made the changes, for example, the NCMP, the NMP and the GRC system. While we want to be true to the needs of change and times, I think we must change slowly for we do not want to lose the very fundamentals why we introduce GRCs, for example.”
“On the advice that Dato' Sri Najib wanted food which is non-oily, so somebody had ordered Italian food for him. And, mind you, that was Friday and having lunch at Arab Street. So, when the waitress went round to Dato' Najib asking him what would he like – chicken pasta or seafood pasta – he gave a smile and said, "Briyani, please." And that is the kind of local reaction, being a Friday, having lunch at Arab Street, I thought briyani or murtabak would have been the answer. But being Singapore, we immediately reacted to it and within five to 10 minutes, we had briyani and murtabak on the table. I do not know whether we can call it "murtabak diplomacy", but I think we need to be attuned to the kind of needs that we have when we meet and look for opportunities with our neighbours, especially Malaysia and Indonesia. The Amir of Qatar had a very short visit and he told us that, in fact, he had to rush back to Doha because President Abbas of Palestine was visiting him and also the Prime Minister of China, Mr Wen Jiabao. Now, this again reminds us that, in fact, when it comes to Middle East, they have so many suitors and if we are not nimble enough, and if we are not up to speed, I think we will also lose out in the race. Sir, on the second point about being competitive, may I just relate my experience as Mayor of North-East CDC. When I was first appointed as Mayor of North-East CDC, it was basically with a task to promote social bonding. But before we knew it, economy started to slow down and we had to be told that, in fact, the CDCs now have to pay a lot of attention to jobs, jobs, jobs. To me, that is even more significant because what is bonding when you have your neighbours with empty stomachs?”
“If I may add, judging from the debate yesterday in Parliament, even the soul, when we discuss the kind of secularism we want for future Singapore. Here, I would like to thank Prof. Thio for remembering minor mortals like me when she eloquently presented her case about secularism with a soul in Singapore. May I, Sir, focus on three areas raised by the President: (1) the new challenging world environment; (2) enhancing our economic competitiveness; and (3) evolving our political system. The President's observation that the re-drawn global landscape will be less benign and predictable is worth paying attention to. With growing globalisation, and emerging economies like China and India, we need to continue to remain nimble and competitive. While China and India will draw lots of attention, we must also ensure that we can take the other opportunities that are presenting themselves. By some coincidence, during the break after President's Address, the Prime Minister of Malaysia, Dato' Sri Najib Tun Razak and the Amir of Qatar made official visits to Singapore. This serves to remind us that there are other opportunities which we should actually do a lot more in terms of the steps that we need to take to prepare for. I think we all know about the Middle East. We have been going there quite often with many delegations by the Prime Minister, Senior Minister Goh, Minister Mentor and many other Ministers. But Middle East is not an easy area. As opportunities get more difficult and more competitive, I think we must also ensure that we do not lose out in our race for the benefits in Middle East. Similarly, with Malaysia, if I may cite what happened during lunch when Dato' Najib visited the Sultan Mosque.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, thank you for allowing me to speak on the motion. Sir, speaking only two months after the Budget Statement, speaks volumes about how an extraordinary budget for extraordinary times, can be quite extraordinary. One might ask, why the need to prorogue Parliament. Uniquely Singapore, perhaps? But more than that, Sir, it is an important signal about the continuing challenges that we have to face in these very unpredictable times. We have always been challenged by all kinds of problems and issues, from self-government, which we celebrate its 50th anniversary this June, to independence pangs, communism, racial and religious extremism, regional and international relations, and, of course, economic slowdown, to meltdown and the vagaries of economic development. Some speak of recovery in the U-shape, some the V-shape, but what the President asks for is that no matter what, we Singaporeans have to remain in the G-shape, in good shape, physically and psychologically, to face the continuing challenges. After all, we are in the midst of unpredictable times. Mr Speaker, Sir, the President spoke of the roller-coaster ride over the last three years. But I wonder whether how many in this House have really taken a roller-coaster. Some are so huge that the sight of them alone can be very scary. For example, The Six Flags in Jacksonville in the US. Some believe that the US, the world's largest economy, was the cause of this recession and its U- or V-shaped recovery will very much depend on how the Americans tackle their problems. Meanwhile, as the President said, we cannot sit around wringing hands but instead should get our mind and body prepared for the opportunities that will present themselves when the situation turns.”
“This Bill represents a major step in the continuous review of our public order management framework which seeks to balance the interests of national security, public safety, community rights to law and order and the legitimate interests of individuals seeking to pursue political activities to express their views through lawful and legitimate means. The Act will provide a framework that can then be evolved over time as our society evolves, even as we preserve the key principles that have brought us safety, security and communal peace so far. Sir, I beg to move. Question proposed. 3.13 pm”
“There is no question of a person filming an activity or circulating it, without knowing that he is not supposed to do so, and being prosecuted for it. The Act does not provide for that. Property owners Under clause 42, if an owner or occupier of a property is given notice by any police officer that the assembly or procession is unlawful before the assembly or procession takes place, and such assembly or procession does take place on his premises, the owner or occupier of those premises could be guilty of an offence if he does not take reasonable steps to prevent it from taking place. Other miscellaneous provisions Due to the nature of their work, police officers face more danger in their line of work compared to other civil servants. To protect them, we are making it an offence under clause 39 for a person to obstruct a police officer when he is attempting to arrest and detain an unauthorised person from re-entering a special event area, and when he is issuing a filming prohibition order or exercising powers of search, seizure and arrest in relation to a filming prohibition order. At the same time the Public Order Act is enacted, MHA intends to repeal section 5 of the MOA which regulates public assemblies and public processions. The subsisting subsidiary legislation under the repealed provisions will be re-enacted under this Bill. A minor change will be made to section 18 of the Police Force Act (Cap. 235) as a consequence of the repeal of section 5 of the MOA. Finally, the definition of "public entertainment" in the PEMA will be amended by removing the reference to lectures, talks, addresses, debates or discussions in public places. Such lectures, talks, addresses, debates or discussions in public places will no longer require a separate permit under the PEMA.”
“Our provision is therefore scoped more narrowly than the recent UK amendments to the Terrorism Act 2000, which criminalise upfront the eliciting or communication of information likely to be useful in preparing or committing a terrorist act which has raised concerns that the filming or photographing of any police officer will be regarded as an offence. This limited approach is taken in favour of starting immediately with a more sweeping general offence for filming like the UK model. We prefer to see how our provisions work for the law enforcement officers and review if need be, in time. There has been some confusion on the intent and scope of the filming provision among the public. The Straits Times published an article by Ms Clarissa Oon on 27th March 2009, commenting on recent amendments to the Films Act. The writer in that article suggested in relation to the filming provision in the POA, that "it is not unreasonable to infer, as many netizens have, that those who film civil disobedience acts and share the videos are liable to prosecution – even if they do not know if what they are filming is illegal, or how it might interfere with police operations." This is not accurate on a number of counts. First, the provision relating to filming is not targeted at acts of civil disobedience at all. The powers are tightly scoped to where a security operation can be prejudiced or the life of the officer is endangered. The power cannot be used to prevent filming of police abuse or civil activist events. Further, a person who films a relevant activity commits an offence only when he is directed to stop filming and refuses to do so, or if he is directed to surrender a film and fails to do so.”
“Clause 38 allows a law enforcement officer to direct any person to stop filming, or take photographs or exhibit or communicate any film or picture which may prejudice the effective conduct of an ongoing law enforcement operation or investigation or any intelligence operation, or may endanger or will endanger the safety of any law enforcement officer in such an ongoing operation or investigation, or any intelligence operation. The officers who can give these directions are any police officer of or above the rank of sergeant, CPIB officers, narcotics officers, intelligence officer and immigration officers. Any person who fails to comply with such a direction will be guilty of an offence. An enforcement officer may also, under clause 38, without warrant, search any person or place as set out in that clause for the relevant film and related items. The officer can also take into custody any person reasonably believed to be in possession of such a film or picture. These powers are not intended to be used to prohibit the filming of routine Police work or events. These powers are only intended to provide protection to officers and preserve the integrity of sensitive operations. If a police officer is misconducting himself, our approach is that the public can film such acts of misconduct. The film will be relied upon for investigation and disciplinary action if warranted. We have decided at this stage not to have a general offence for filming.”
“The Move-On Order will be in the form of a written notice that will state the area and time period, up to 24 hours, within which the subject is prohibited from re-entering. Having the order in a written form promotes clarity and certainty and will ensure a certain level of formality in the issuing of an order and accountability on the part of the person issuing it. If a person thinks he has been wrongfully issued with an order, he must nevertheless comply with it first but is later free to make a case to the officers’ Commanding Officer or the Commissioner of Police. As an added measure of accountability, the power can only be used by a police officer of or above the rank of sergeant. Filming of security operations There are also specific situations where recording an on-going incident can potentially jeopardise the success of security operations or the safety of officers. The recent Mumbai terrorist incident is a case in point, where journalists and private individuals were able to film the operations of security forces as the events unfolded. Potentially, indiscriminate filming could give information to the terrorists about what security forces were doing or planning to do, jeopardise rescue operations, and harm the lives of the victims and the officers conducting the rescue. Likewise, a covert officer’s cover can be blown by a video recording disseminated on the Internet. Not only will the officer be unable to continue working covertly, he may even become a target for retaliation.”
“No such direction may be given unless it is in the interests of public safety, public order or the protection of the rights and freedoms of other persons. A direction may remain in force for a maximum of 24 hours, and it can include a distance and direction a person must move, or a distance from a place which the person must not enter for a maximum period of 24 hours. An offence will occur only when a person, without reasonable excuse, fails to comply with any direction of a police officer. If a person complies with the order and leaves the designated area, no offence will be made out against him. The order is not treated as a Police warning and there is no record of adverse antecedent against the person. By giving the person in the first instance, an opportunity to cooperate with the law enforcement authorities, the move-on powers bridge the current gap of 'doing nothing' and 'outright arrest'. This achieves our aim of taking a more calibrated approach. Although our provisions are similar to those of Queensland, our provisions are more narrowly scoped as we decided not to have move-on powers in relation to the very presence of a person. Our provisions will only apply to a person’s actual behaviour, and not his mere presence. We have also decided not to allow move-on powers to be applied when a person’s behaviour causes anxiety to another person. That may be too broad. Unlike the Australians, we also do not intend to use move-on powers to address social disamenities such as the creation of noise or loitering in housing estates. Such actions, in our view, should be addressed through existing laws and community solutions that involve Town Councils, grassroots bodies and mediation councils.”