Richard E. Neal
Representative for Massachusetts · Democratic · United States
“Mr. Speaker, the proposal that we are hearing from the other side is reckless and irresponsible. What they are saying is what they usually say: Let's complain about the size of the national debt and then borrow the money for tax cuts to go to people at the very top.”
“The tax cut for the person at the top was 288 times what it was for the person making less than $50,000 a year. These are the numbers. They don't lie. The messaging that comes from the other side would have you believe that they are on top of defending Medicare, Social Security, and Medicaid.”
The complete record
Every one of 2 lines we hold for Richard E. Neal, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account.
“The tax cut for the person at the top was 288 times what it was for the person making less than $50,000 a year. These are the numbers. They don't lie. The messaging that comes from the other side would have you believe that they are on top of defending Medicare, Social Security, and Medicaid. They are threatening all three with these proposals. I have not seen anything in my time like this, making massive cuts to Medicaid, closing Social Security offices, threatening Medicare, laying off veterans at veteran services offices, and then providing a tax cut to those in billionaire heaven down in the Cabinet. Let's have an honest discussion between the two parties about fiscal policy.”
“Mr. Speaker, the proposal that we are hearing from the other side is reckless and irresponsible. What they are saying is what they usually say: Let's complain about the size of the national debt and then borrow the money for tax cuts to go to people at the very top. I defy anybody on this side to say right now that that is not what happened in 2017. They borrowed $2.3 trillion, gave a tax cut to the wealthiest amongst us, and then complained about Biden running up the national debt. [[Page H1548]] The arithmetic doesn't work on this. The messaging might remain consistent, but what I have just said is entirely accurate. The money was borrowed in 2017. Then, when you look at tax distribution tables, just take a look at who got the money.”