YouSaid · the spoken record

Adrian Meli

lines on the record
76
first
2025-09-15
most recent
2025-09-15
sittings or episodes
1
sources
podcast

Every line below is reproduced as it was said and linked to the record it came from. Nothing here is summarised or generated. Directory · Search · Corrections

  1. Getting to grow up with somebody who's as wonderful as her, who offers you relentless emotional support from a young age and is your biggest fan, you can't replace that. I don't think I'd recommend it to people marrying somebody you date so early. It just doesn't make mathematical sense. But if you do and you get it right, there's just a lollopalooza to it. The way I describe it to people is sometimes our two daughters do something and it just makes us smile. And we don't say anything when we look at each other. And I think what we're both thinking is, gosh, this really worked out in the end. How cool. I would never expect it to find my spouse and my soulmate so young. I would have never expected to only have two jobs after college so far and be afforded unusually good opportunities at a young age. I would never have expected to live in the Northeast. And if I think about it all, it's very unusual in life to be able to spend your life, time at home and at work with people you love and admire. And for that, I'm truly grateful.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  2. Glitter lots and lots of glitter and stuff, so much stuff amazing, Cali loves stuff. I didn't expect any of this. I just remember the goofy teenager who was immature and comically competitive and had a subwarf in his car and had a shrine to Michael Jordan and sold Cuckoo knives and worked at the local shoe store for minimum wage had a lot of room for improvement. I met my wife, Jennifer, when I was very young, waiting tables at a moderately priced Mexican restaurant in Texas. And it was love at first sight for me. And so we weren't having money back then. I remember we would go to Sam's club to buy calling cards to call each other because cell phone mines were so expensive or we would pool money to visit each other.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  3. I wonder about all the normal stuff. Like, are we in a simulation afterlife? How are the pyramids built? All that stuff. I often think about how my life could have ended up very similarly to this growing up in different states or different colleges or different first jobs. These two most valuable things in my life, my children, how a very specific pattern of events had to play out for them to be here. But if you really want to know the answer to this, if I'm sitting on my bed at night, rolling around and the thoughts I wonder about how many non-alcoholic beers can I have per alcoholic beer before the placebo effect wears off. I wonder whenever I go to a white elephant gift exchange party why people are the worst versions of themselves. I think about a lot, what a high percentage of a dress shirt's total cost to spend on dry clean. And then when I go back to Texas, I wonder why people think line dancing is fun. And I also wonder on the way why people think word finds are fun on the plane.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  4. It's by far putting my 10 year old daughter Maisie and five year old daughter Callie to bed. It's the time of day where the house is quiet, everything slows down. They are so chatty and hilarious and goofy and we're goofy together and dancing and singing and playing pranks and reading or what have you. And so what if bedtime takes an hour? And the most fun part of it all is when we push just long enough that my wife who is the most patient human being I've ever met turns her head at me and looks at me a little bit and says, Adrian, are you ready for some constructive criticism? I think you could use some help with your bedtime skills. I say the only thing better than one daughter is having two. And I think I'll always remember the bedtimes. And I hope they do too.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  5. To the answers of things and debate things, and you can do it behind closed doors. The amount you can learn is off the charts. And it's even a little bit better than that tip. So Alec is articulate and concise. So he says really smart things very quickly. So when we talk, I learn a lot, but I also get to speak more than half of the time. So we call that a twofer.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  6. My father's love of business and my parents' love of a good deal impacted my life. The founder of Eagle Ravenel Curry gave me enormous opportunities and trust at a young age for which I'll forever be grateful and change my life. And he's just a terrific entrepreneur and long-term thinker. So it's been wonderful to spend so many years with him. But the person by far who's impacting my life on a business senses, my partner Alec Henry. So I met Alec a couple decades ago in the investment world. And we've been talking daily or almost daily ever since. And we talk about everything from financial markets to the psychology of sales to our cold plunges actually healthier. It's everything. Well, I'll tell you about Alec is he's brilliant. He's very sharp. He's curious. He's kind. And he's one of these people that always does the right thing. And if you surround yourself with somebody like Alec, it can't help but bend you in a good direction. I like to think he's had that impact on me. If you find somebody that you respect, that you have mutual admiration for and you like to get.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  7. I'll die on the hill, that romantic comedies are criminally underrated. And you look at these rotten tomato ratings 25, 30%. It seems crazy to me. I've never seen one I don't like. I just think they're mood enhancing. So if you think about it, you click play. The world stands still. Everything's a little quiet. My brain shuts down. A smile comes across my face because I know it's going to have a happy ending.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  8. My two passions in life are my family and business, and I've oriented my life to spend time there. And it crowds out other things. But one thing I do have a passion for are rom-coms.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  9. It's harder to raise money in the active equity space, harder to raise money in the private equity space. It's hard to raise money in a lot of areas. And so you're going to see opportunities as a lot of these private companies have to find ways into the market. What I hope is going to happen is you'll see a number of younger smart managers who would have been in the hedge fund will start long only at lower fees that'll make that opportunity set richer. And I think people will focus more there. But the world is pretty expensive.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  10. Of any asset class, generally I'm in. But I look at the base rates of the SP index, I look at the base rates of LBOs today, I look at venture capital, I look at private credit. It's pretty tough out there. There's a lot of expensive assets. That's the challenge. If you look back at finance for the last 100 years, you have all these companies, you have the markets trend towards a liquidity, efficiency, and low cost, type bid ass spreads in Marvel of the World, the US capital markets. It's odd to me that we're now shifted to a world where assets are staying private, bid ask spreads are wide, the fees are high. And I don't know how or when it all plays out, but in the fullness of time, hopefully in my career, we'll see a change where I think these markets merge somehow interval funds are first step in that direction, secondary funds. So what I think is going to be interesting over the next three, five, seven years is parts of Asia, Japan, Korea could be interesting. There's parts of the VC world that I think are pretty interesting. There's no money in biotech.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  11. Here looks a little tricky. Now, AI can bail this out and productivity growth could go crazy. Who knows? I'm not bearish at all. I'm on it. I'm just saying it looks a little worse, the base rate to me. And yet it seems odd saying this because the Nasdaq and S&P keep setting new highs, but we're still finding things that we think are really interesting. But there's plenty of things that are flat or down over five, six, seven years out there that I think are interesting and at low points in their cycle. And so I go across all assets and say, okay, private equity, venture capital, private credit. In the same way the hedge fund world was a great opportunity set 25 years ago, but the fees came in, too high a fees at too much capital. The LBO world had a great opportunity set too. They had less capital there. They had lower multiples and rates came down. Looks to me like same thing. Lots of capital goes here. Lots of smart people go here in the Ford return streams comes down. If you want to give me one of the top quartile of VC firms, you want to let me into Union Square Ventures or benchmark, I'm in. So the top quartile...

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  12. I've always focused on the flow of funds. If you look at the last 10 years, the index has been great. That's been the place to be. I feel a little differently about it today. So I look at that like any asset. And I don't want to tie it all back to what you said. So today I would look at that same asset and I'd say, okay, hire multiple, less diversified, more of a factor bet on AI and power. We've run the economy hot, tons of fiscal deficit problems. If I just look at that and you didn't tell me the name was the S&P index, I would say maybe whatever percentage of my money I had in that 10 years ago, I might want less today. That is how my brain would work. And then I would think, where do I want my money? And it doesn't mean you should give it to Eagle or private equity or private credit or Bitcoin or whatever. But it does mean as a starting point, we have to look at assets and valuations and how they change over time. I think the index is less interesting today. You put your money there for 50 years, I don't know, eight, nine, ten percent. But the base rate of starting from

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  13. Trying to hire people that are better than me. And I think we've done that. I mean, it's pretty special. My wife was a kindergarten teacher. She's like, this is ridiculous. You get to meet with all these interesting people all day, work with these really smart people who are super talented, meet with management teams, and you get to learn. Effectively, I think I have the best job in the world. I get to learn all day long and work with these really talented people. Organizationally, to increase the excellence, we recognize that every year that goes by, we have to get better and we're competing against these really smart players out there. It's making sure the management layer of the firm is thinking through all the ways we need to be able to track both capital and talent. On the talent side, it's how can we make this a great seat for them, a great career for them. And if we can continue to do all this stuff, I think a lot of the industry is falling away. We can get better while a lot of the industry is under siege. And if they keep shrinking their time horizons and we keep using duration, investing organizationally.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  14. Pretty simple. The firm is named Eagle, it's not named after any one person. Doing our job well means continuing to grow the talent side of the firm and continuing to attract great clients. If we can do that, I think we'll be able to out alpha over time. There's no gross mandate here. We're big enough to hire who we need to hire and build this great firm that we think we built. We're also small enough that we can still find interesting pockets of alpha. It feels about the right size. We could grow a little, shrink a little. The North Star to us is really growth and excellence. That's what we're solving for. People focus in this industry on flows and all this stuff. I get it. But like if our performance is up 15% or down 15%, that influences much more than anything else. So what we can solve for is talent, making ourselves relevant in the world and trying to build the excellence of eagle. And I think if we do that, everything will play out well.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  15. Yeah, sure. So we have to meet clients where they are. There's a lot of excitement about ETFs. People like it. People like being able to click a button. People like different attributes of it. So we were able to do it for clients. And I think the reception has been much higher than I would have thought. It's funny to hear people tell me, it's like, oh, I bought your ETF. I still am getting used to that. It feels different. But again, what we're trying to do is add value to clients, meet them where they are. A lot of people are like this structure. And we want to have a resilient business. So I think of it as increasing the duration of the firm, giving clients another way to access us. And it's fun to be early on things.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  16. Rewards. And the portfolio isn't sized based on the highest IRRs. A lot of times, the highest IRRs have the fattest tails to them. And so what they are sized by is a combination of judgment, IRR, and just perception of risk reward. The bigger positions tend to be things with a lot of ballast in them, good balance sheets, good management, and the smaller positions tend to be things either we're entering or exiting or things that have fat or tails. The other aspect of this is, given that we want to have a diversity of bets, If you bring in a new name, let's say we owned a bunch of something in a sector today and somebody comes up with a new name in there, it's going to have a higher bar. We prioritize more diversity of earning streams, we prioritize higher IRRs, we prioritize returns relative to the risk involved, and then we try to build a portfolio that will work in a broad set of outcomes that we can imagine.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  17. Everybody wants to have this beautiful funnel slide where, hey, I look at this many names, it feeds through. We got this great process that spits out the names. It's imperfect. Some of it's fundamental analysis on IRRs, some of its judgment. I believe a burden in the hand is worth two in the bush. We have a dashboard internal. And what we do is we pull through all of our companies and we look at the earnings models that we have internally and compare them against analysts, sell side. We look where we're at a consensus out five to seven years. We look at analyst level conviction. We look at the returns that we expect relative to the volume of the asset, which is an imperfect measure. So if we have different return streams, if one of them is non-cyclical with a clean balance sheet, recurring revenue, great management, and it shoots the same IRR as another name that has all these hairy characteristics, I should be buying a lot of that first return stream. So what we're doing is we're looking at all the return streams possible. And then we're saying, what are the best risk?

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  18. Of them at trophy multiples on trophy earnings that could be interesting. The one in the headlines today that they may work, they may not, but there's HMOs out there. The healthcare industry, there's a lot of pressure in Medicare advantage, a lot of pressure in certain segments. The margins are way down in certain areas. The multiples are way down. These stocks were considered great companies 18 months ago, 24 months ago, compounders, some of them trading over 20 times earnings, hyens multiple today, are we at trough margins and are we at low multiples now that these drives? I want to have a portfolio of 25 to 35 things like this where the return stream is really high out five to seven years and I know somewhat work.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  19. Opportunity set, and there's a lot of smart private equity firms still deploying capital there. And you could say, Are all of them going out? Or are there going to be some that survive? And they look like they're trading at very low multiples in a world that's paying very high multiples for quality businesses. And these once were perceived as quality businesses. You can imagine things related to building products or homebuilders today. I think there's a pretty clear consensus that homes are affordable. Home prices gone way up over the last few years. mortgage rates way up. We're under building the amount of new homes we need. There's this too strong bullcase that we're undersupplied by three to five million homes. Yeah, maybe, but you have to be able to afford them. So I don't really believe it. But I think it's pretty clear. A lot of these companies are training at lowish multiples on below normalized housing starts and it's affecting a lot of companies. Not all of them is a great opportunity set, but I think there are things in that space that if you close your eyes three to five years, the home building industry, the building products industries, there will be a better day ahead. And if you could buy...

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  20. Pull up our 13F. You'll see a lot. It's not fun. I don't want to be blase about it. You buy one of these things and it goes down every day. And every time we sell something that has momentum in it, it goes up the next day. Let's give a few random examples of what that could look like today without being too stock specific. So let's look at something in the headlines today, like SaaS companies. Everybody thought they were these great businesses. And now today they're trading at low multiples on our view of normalized earnings. So what we want to know is what's the end state margin structure of a business? What does that mean? Stock comp, you have to tax. And so a lot of these are stock comp pigs. So we care a lot about who's managing these. What's the retention rate of the business? How is the sales efficiency look over time? And then what's the natural end state of the margins of that? We have a view on some companies. And so the reason they're trading cheaply is because AI. Now, AI might be right. AI might take out all these SaaS companies. That's a legitimate bear case. But it might not. You could look through that.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  21. Because the return streams are imperfect and the path is uncertain. But in the end, what we're looking at is what's the entry multiple? Are we below mid cycle? How fast are earning is going to grow over time and what's the likely end state? If you go back 10 years ago, our portfolio looked more growthy. Today, our portfolio is trading at enormous discount to the market because that's where we're refining the opportunities. And it makes sense to me conceptually that as the capital has flowed short term and the liquidity has gone down in many ways, that the opportunity set would be shifting.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  22. And quant strategies or systematic strategies. A lot of these folks have done really well. And their mandates are short term. And then you have this long only community under stress. They're shortened their time horizon. You have the sell side who shortened their time horizon to respond to the actors. And you look at all this and you say, oh my gosh, all the capital is flowing to a short-term opportunity set. And then you see anything related to the momentum, the test of the times, AI, power factors going crazy. And then you see these great compoundary businesses trading at 35 times 40 times earnings. And then you see these returns streams over here that you can't give away. Okay, the path looks very uncertain, but the destination looks pretty good. Whose job is it to buy those? Where is the capital to buy those names? It's not because people are stupid. It's because if you don't know if you're going to be in a seat in two or three years, why should you do that? So it makes sense to me today that there is growing differentiation in those names out there. And it is harder to buy them.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  23. What's happening is the market is becoming a little more inefficient over the last five years in real time. And why might that be? When we talked about the world becoming more efficient from indexing, one of the things that I don't think was often discussed is there was this view that over time how much of the world could be indexed? Could you have 99% of the world indexed? Could you have 90%? Nobody knew the answer. But the idea was in the end, there would be these 10 smart funds setting the price of the market perfectly efficiently. It makes sense in an academic sense. But like most things in finance, ideas that make sense at the beginning become goofy at their extremes. So what if you got to that standpoint and you got to that state of the market, how would fund flows influence things? What if you had very few active actors and now a stimulus check came in and then there were a bunch of retail buyers of specific assets? But there's not liquidity there. How does that change the market dynamic? So if you have happening now is the market is indexing the capital has flowed to multi-man.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  24. Up emerging markets. They're not always great indexes. And so sometimes the index is really good and sometimes it's not. That's been magnified recently by a sneaking hypothesis that I'm hesitant to say out here because there's a high probability I'm wrong, but I will say it. I feel like the market's becoming a little less efficient in certain areas. And I'll explain it. Let's just look at the last five years and say, well, does that look efficient to you, Ted? What happened in 2020? All these fake companies at enormous multiple SPAC bubbles, unicorns, it was a meme stock frenzy. That didn't look so efficient in retrospect. You couldn't give away a cyclical company, so to speak. Two years goes by. 2022, what happens? Interest rates go up. Regime change. The whole world shifts. Tech stocks plummet. ChatGPT comes out. Tech stocks are back up. Now we have a meme stock, crrenzy, momentum factors off the charts. And you can't give away any of these companies that have unpredictable earnings right now. But we want to be very careful. This isn't easy to harness. It's hard to beat the market. But it looks to me like...

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  25. Math of Let's say you were in a very, very concentrated index where the biggest weights were then up the most, it would be hard to beat that index. If you didn't own any of those big tech weights, imagine you had to replicate the performance of those by not owning them. It was very statistically unlikely you were going to beat all these big tech platforms that were scaling fast, growing by not owning them. So your track record is impaired. Now let's just say you did own them. You over time looked more and more like the index. Your active share goes down. So the alpha dispersion gets slower. So is it a coincidence that a lot of the best hedge fund track records were created from the late 90s to 2010 and then a lot of them don't look great? Or is it a difference in opportunity set? If you bring it up to today, what does the world look like? Where is the capital float? Where are the opportunities? Indexes are sometimes really good, sometimes they're not. You go parts of Japan for 25 years, look at China, look at US was negative for over 10 years. Look at parts of Europe.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  26. So, they were making a living. And when they could no longer play here, a lot of people moved offshore. Slowly over time, they were effectively playing against each other. And this is what our framework for investing had been. One of the misnomers of what's happened to the active management world over the last 10 years, a lot of people think that this framework is what killed active management, impossible to beat the market. The world was trending towards efficiency. That's why a lot of active management hasn't done well for the last 10 years. My framework's a little different. For the last 10 years, part of it has passive made the world more efficient and the talent, density running into the industry and the computers and the systematic traders and all the smart people. But part of it is really the opportunity set. I basically think mega cap technology killed a lot of the active management world. And the reason for that is pretty simple. If you study the history of alpha, you realize there's just different alpha pools at different times. And so if you're in a world where you're competing against a market capweighted index, what happens is if you just look at

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  27. Like the question. I'll accept it My career starting in 2002 is very clear in retrospect that the markets were trending towards efficiency. I thought indexing was a big part of that for a long time. The easiest way to explain it to somebody who's not in the industry is you and I go into a poker parlor. There's 100 people around a table. You take out the 40 worst, which was indexing, and the remaining 60 is harder to beat. That makes it more competitive. Return should go down. This actually happened in real life. I think maybe 15 years ago, I read a story about when the US made it so you couldn't play poker online. There were a lot of people who were making a living here playing against people in financial services who were having three beers at night, hobbyists or whatever.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  28. Once you dive in and start to get conviction in a company, how do you integrate the idea of where fund flows are going? And you could think about it as both the index funds and passive management and the pod shops on the other end of the spectrum

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  29. So, this is something we've iterated and tried to learn at over time. We have a generalist framework. We're looking for outliers. But then within that, we have a pragmatic specialization. It would be very hard to build a team if you started from scratch today of 10 very great senior analysts with just generalist frameworks because they're coming from single manager hedge funds often or pods where they've had a specialization. So what we want to do is press within the analyst function when we notice an outlier. We want to be dangerous enough that we can notice outliers. And then when we do that, we want to spend an incredible amount of time doing deep research to make sure we're expert within that area.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  30. The next buyer is going to be looking at a few years. So we have to have a view on is it going to get disrupted in this time horizon? So that's the starting point. And then it's all the normal stuff, reading everything we can get, podcasts on it, find the CEO, find anybody we know who's worked there, anybody executives there, tons of background research on the company and the executives looking at the executive compensation.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  31. That said, we actually do get pretty good access to them. The easier companies to rip apart are the ones that are less oriented as conglomerates. Because if you buy a big conglomerate with 10 business lines, you're not going to rip apart every business line. But some of these big companies are very focused on individual areas. And so the research process here is first, could this be an interesting return stream? Why is it dislocated? Do we believe capital is flowing into this area, out of this area? Is it likely we're going to find an interesting return stream to start? What does the disruption look like in five or ten years? If we were looking at a railroad, we would be debating self-driving electric trucks. Doesn't always play out. We met with AstroTeller, the head of Google X, over 10 years ago, and we were talking about self-driving cars. And we thought self-driving cars were going to happen. So we avoided a lot of things thinking self-driving cars were happening. So really what we want to know is, is the base rate return assumption of the asset high? When we're selling the stock out five, six, seven years.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  32. I grew up doing a lot of small cap stuff in MICAP. It is true you can get better access in differential access. There's no cell side coverage or limited there. People aren't focused on it. The problem is that asset pool is not as rich as it used to be. If you looked at the small cap index today, it's a lot of biotech, a lot of unprofitable companies, a lot of the big conglomerates took out a lot of the best franchises there. Private equity owns some of them. And then there just haven't been as many IPOs of those companies. It's not that we're dispositionally wanting to do large cap. I don't consider myself large cap investor. We own some smaller companies. It's that in a world of AI, tech change, globalization, these companies got to grow bigger and stronger and scale faster than we had seen in history. So the process of ripping them apart, it's a little different if we're being intellectually honest. Some of the big tech platforms, the founder, doesn't go meet with us a lot. They got better things to do that are worth $100, $200 billion without taking my phone call.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  33. Back to your friend teasing you about, well, your track record's just large cap growth. When you have the opportunity to spend the time to dive in on a large cap company, what does that work look like to get your hands around something that presumably everyone has access to all the information on a big company?

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  34. Today, and you're in the third inning or eighth inning. So we're a little less comfortable with forecasting some of the big tech earning streams. You just have to be honest with yourself five years ago. SaaS companies, you had all these trading at 40 to 50 to 60 times revenue at one point. Today, it's hard to give away a lot of SaaS companies. So there will be a lot of companies that look like obvious winners of all this that I think will be obvious losers. If we do our jobs well, we'll be able to find a number of names that will benefit from AI. We'll be able to find some in the middle that aren't obvious beneficiaries of AI that will take advantage of it, which we have some ideas there. And then we'll hopefully avoid a lot that will get taken out by AI.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  35. And I need them to use their balance sheet a little bit. And I need the multiple never to go down. And that's not my experience. If I buy a company at 10 times earnings on trough earnings that is going to grow earnings a few percent, I don't need much to happen to get double-jit to returns. One is not the better earning stream than the other. The way you construct an earning stream for us is you look at the earnings or free cash flow, you look at the growth of that, and then the multiple plus or minus. So on the tech side, in the AI bill today, I think it's really tough. It is hard enough to identify what a big search engine is going to look like in three years, what the profit pool of that is, with the growth of ChatGPT. The idea that so many of these companies trade at high multiples seems hard to justify. Our best guess is some great companies will take out costs, make money on AI. There'll be a lot of that, but there'll be a lot of disruption if this is right. The CapEx will be overbuilt. Infrastructure, highways, all these things you ultimately in a CapEx cycle, you just don't know if...

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  36. Yeah, life is pretty tough. If you go back in time and look at some of the big tech platforms, my only quibble with some of the asset allocation community is I like to think it was somewhat predictable 10 or 15 years ago that these companies would be able to scale globally with the internet and be better return streams. If you looked at the structure of these businesses and what the internet allowed, you could compare them. I can see that the profitable businesses in these countries have this margin and the growth investments have a zero negative margin. You can see how the margins would play out. But to get that right, you have to believe the moats in check. A couple thoughts on this. I believe all companies die in the end. It's just a question of when. When I see today the opportunity set and I see a lot of these former great businesses traded at 30, 35, 40 times earnings, I see a 2.5%, 3% free cash flow to get a double digit return, what do I need? They already have high margins. I need for them to be able to grow revenue maybe at organically 6%. Most companies don't outgrow nominal GDP forever.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  37. It's tough. The dream is to buy a franchise company with a huge moat at 14 times earnings that's going to grow faster than nominal GDP forever. It's just the world figured that out, Ted.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  38. Different parts of their life cycle with different factors involved so that we're not reliant on whether interest rates go up or down or the economy strengthens or softens or something happens in Taiwan. We think the base rate of getting that right is lower for us.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  39. After the financial crisis. And then I think people misunderstood the return streams of some of the big tech platforms. We were fortunate to identify some of those early on. We've always been pretty snobby about accounting here. And so I think we understood that the accounting of some of the intangibles early on, which was pretty fortunate today, if we look at it, the return streams we're finding today are different than they were five years ago and 10 years ago. Before I pause on this, one story always stuck with me is when I was back in my early days, I saw this record. It was like the best track record in hedge fund world you've ever seen. And I told somebody, this is the best investor in the world. It's got to be. Look at these returns. So self-confident at that age. And the guy told me, anybody who has those returns in one year, they're taking some factor or some specific risk that is not going to be able to be replicated. It's just a matter of time. I've always taken into account when we're trying to build our portfolio. What we're trying to do is have a portfolio of return streams that play out at different periods of time.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  40. Selfish view of it. I know people can take issue with that. The starting point is can we generate absolute double-digit returns over a long period of time? Think of us as absolute return investors living in a relative return world. We're modeling companies out five, six, seven years, looking at normalized free cash flow earnings per share, assuming a smart buyer is going to want to buy that from us and get an eight, nine, 10% return such that we assume a terminal multiple that's fair. We look at the IRRs across our portfolio, across other companies. And when we do that, the opportunity sets shift over time. Sometimes Eagle looks more growthy. Sometimes it looks more value. It just depends on what that opportunity set is out there. To do what we do, we want to turn over the most amount of rocks possible to pick out these return streams. A good way to find those is where is capital flowing into, where is capital leaving? So if we go back in time, then compoundary type businesses were interested.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  41. That was a nice way of saying it. The reason everybody came into the hedge fund world because it was so fun. He had this big mandate partnership vehicle you could do anything you wanted. That doesn't really exist anymore in broad strokes. It's been diced up. You've got the distressed funds. You've got the pods. You've got some single managers left. But there's not so much capital going to broad opportunistic mandates. It's become more specialized. I was having this debate with somebody recently talking about return streams over the last 10 years. We're proud of our record here. She made the case that, yeah, but you guys have that return stream because you're a large cap equity investor. And I said, hmm, I think you're saying that in a pejorative way. The truth is that's not the way Alec and I saw it. The way we saw it is we picked to do this. We thought the returns going back in time ex ante of larger domestic equities were really good return streams with very low risk and it was a great way to compound our capital personally and for clients. We picked that. So that's our personal.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  42. To push people away from that number one. Number two, in our structure, the N is so low. They're not buying a bunch of new names over time. So to evaluate them on short periods of time when we want the investment case to play out over three, five, seven years doesn't seem aligned. There's just also a couple practical benefits. They like it better. They get paid every two weeks. It's ratable. We don't defer them. And then it also makes it pretty hard to hire them, I think, over time. Imagine you're trying to hire one away. They have to think, what's the expected value of this low base plus high bonus structure versus if I do a great job here, I get paid ratably and then I get a chance to be a partner. The real tangible benefits organizationally on the investment side focusing on investing out over the right period of time. But I also think it's a good to counterposition against the big pods. When you start

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  43. It's an interesting question. We're counterpositioning in many ways against the multi managers who are paying terrific sums of money and hiring a lot of the best talent out there. Imagine we're trying to hire from a top single manager or a pod. The way those fee structures work at a single manager, they're charging a base fee and then an incentive at the end. So their earnings are lumpy. We don't have that issue as a firm. There's no reason we have to pay a base plus bonus because that's not how the partners are paid. Structurally, it's irrelevant to us. So the right question we ask ourselves is, what's the best thing for the analyst and the firm? There's no proof that this is the right way to do it. It's just the way we've done it. If you're at a top fund, you're getting a base plus bonus. The way it actually works is you get your base salary, you wait all year long for your bonus, and you're thinking you can't focus on anything else at the end of the year. And then you get your bonus. And for one or two days, you're like, okay, I got my bonus. And then you start thinking about your next year's bonus. So it creates a really acute sharp focus on whenever the bonus season is.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  44. Apart some of the aspects of the business process and the investment process Of paying salaries only and not bonuses. It was very different from what you hear commonly. Or the subtle benefits of doing that.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  45. We're not activists. We focus on long-term business issues. Of course, we care about short-term results like anybody else, but we really care about how companies are allocating capital and their business strategy in the out years. When we sell the stock someday, we send them nice email often saying, thanks for all you've done for us. It's been really great to be a shareholder, and hopefully we'll have a chance to own that again. If your strategy is short-term, the management access won't matter to you. But if you're going to hold the stock as long as we do, it can matter. And so you marry all this together. I think we have a bit of a right to win. We've given ourselves a shot to do a great job for clients. And then it's up to us to execute. And we like our hand.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  46. Very similar to our client team's job. Our client team's job is to go and try to find clients who like what we do, want to partner with us, will give us duration, want to invest alongside with us, and we'll hopefully stick with us through our drawdowns, which we'll inevitably have. Investor relations job is the same, but to find shareholders. Their challenge is maybe the top two or three shareholders often are going to be a Vanguard State Street or BlackRock. And then the people getting capital and calling them often are long short trading frequently. Those companies have no incentive to spend time with those pods. They have a small incentive, but not a huge incentive. And the banks have a problem too, because they sell management access. And the big companies want duration in their shareholder base. And so they have this issue with the people that are paying the banks often don't have duration in their shareholder base. In the same way, our access to talent has grown over time. Our access to management has also grown. How many firms out there deployed $2 to $3 billion in a company hold it for up to 10 years?

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  47. Over time, and it's up and down the organization. Our head trader was at a big bank, and then the head of trading for a top hedge fund before here. I never thought we'd have the scale to have one of the best traders. I think we do now. It's on the client side. We have terrific client people. I don't want to overstate this. This is a tough industry. There's not very big competitive advantages here. But if you think we have duration in the model, we have access to talent. The other part I'd marry that with is look at the management access side challenge. Imagine you're the head of investor relations at a big company.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  48. Be successful here. So, your likelihood of success given our resources and the time we give you and the ability to debate ideas shoulder to shoulder with all of us, I think is higher in this model if you like doing this. We take you off the base plus bonus treadmill that you've been on and we give you an opportunity over three, four, five years to become a partner in the organization. And I think that's a differentiated value proposition because if you look at their lives, it's different than when I came out, you had more demand to hire hedge fund analysts in 2002 than you had a supply of them. Today, the seats are tougher. Capital has gone to indexing. It's flowed out of a lot of the long-only space. There are less hiring there in general, fewer seats are going to be there over time. And it's gone to systematic strategies and more pot oriented strategies. And the multi-managers, a few of the big ones have just done terrific job. And they're great seats if you're good and want to do that specific thing. But the seats to do what we do aren't that many. That dynamic has grown.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  49. 20, 30 years. So we're hiring, attracting, and recruiting talent to continue to build that. And so you ask about talent, that has singularly been the most fun thing about working here is that watching that talent density grow over the last 17 years. Look at our team. If you look at their bios, top hedge funds, private equity firms, and the like, and you say, well, why did this happen? Why were we able to recruit those people? They're just amazing. I feel so fortunate to work with them. The pitch to them is this. If you love doing what we do, you love deep research, long-term investing, we think we're a good home for you. You come in, you sit shoulder to shoulder with Alec and me in every research meeting debating the entire portfolio, debating new names that you're pitching, and you can have an enormous impact on the future of Eagle. You're under one of under 10 people. You can deploy a lot of capital, and you have duration built into the model. And you only have to pick one new name every year or two.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source

  50. Have an average client relationship circa 10 years. The client base is diversified by end market, endowment, foundation, pension, high net worth, sovereign. All of those actors can act differently at different times. This all creates ballast and duration into the model. In a world that's become more short-term, that duration is a growing competitive differentiation. But we built it more into the organization than just that. On the investment side, none of the analysts are paid bonuses that are all paid salary. We want them to be focused on duration. And it's all built around an investment partnership. There's a number of partners at Eagle. We all live and die by the performance of the fund. If we have a bad numbers, there's no reason for us to exist. So we all eat the cooking together heavily invest in the strategy. Alex heavily invests in the strategy. And we're compounding our own money along with clients. We do that on a fund basis in terms of the stock picking, but also we do it organizationally. If we've been around for 35 years, we think we have an opportunity around for the next 10 years.

    2025-09-15 · Capital Allocators · Adrian Meli – Active Equity Excellence at Eagle (EP.459) · IDENTIFIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT · source