YouSaid · the spoken record

BASHEV

lines on the record

190

first

1963-09-24

most recent

1969-09-24

sittings or episodes

5

sources

un-general-debate

Every line below is reproduced as it was said and linked to the record it came from. Nothing here is summarised or generated. Directory · Search · Corrections

1. “These principles correspond to the present trend in the development of the international community and to the realities of today’s world. 76. The Bulgarian people, who recently celebrated the twenty-fifth anniversary of the establishment of their socialist Republic, are deeply convinced that a universal and lasting peace is no longer Utopian but is a realizable goal. Our peoples are prepared, as always, to join all other peoples in an effort to reach this goal during this generation, in accordance with the noble principles of the Charter.”

   1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

2. “These principles reflected the deepest aspirations of millions of human beings throughout the world who had survived the horrors of a war of extermination, as well as the most ardent desire of the peoples to lay the foundations of a world of security, peace and fruitful co-operation. The most important principles of the Charter of the United Nations require that the solution of international problems should at the same time ensure respect for the interests of all peoples, great and small, regardless of their social and political régime. These principles are the very essence of peaceful coexistence, as defined at the time of the establishment of the first socialist State by Lenin, whose centenary will be celebrated by the peoples of the whole world in 1970.”

   1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

3. “That is the main direction in which the United Nations should channel its action to resolve the problems of under-development. Mere disapproval of neo-colonialist methods and practices in international economic relations is not sufficient. The greatest help which the United Nations could give the countries of the third world would be to assist them in the effective mobilization of their own domestic resources to build an independent national economy. 75. A quarter of a century ago, the United Nations laid down in its Charter the democratic, progressive and humane principles on which the relations between States and peoples should be based.”

   1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

4. “This co-ordination can be effective only if its main objective is to remove the obstacles which lie in the developing countries’ path towards economic and social progress. Can one expect substantial results in this field if many Western countries — the major economic partners of the countries of the third world — continue to consider and treat those countries mainly as sources of cheap raw materials and as objects of exploitation? Policies which impede the progress of final decolonization are also a major obstacle to the ambition of the recently-liberated countries to ensure sufficiently rapid development for their peoples. 74. Within the framework of international activities for development, specific and effective measures must be taken to safeguard the economic interests of the young States.”

   1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

5. “The Secretary-General has said in the introduction to his annual report that “in order to bridge the widening development gap, there must be a sincere willingness on the part of the international community to do so” [A/7601/Add.1, para. 85]. In other words, the existence of a “political will” in all States and Governments is necessary in order to make an effective contribution to the rapid economic and social development of the young States. Has this condition been fulfilled on the eve of the Second United Nations Development Decade? 73. To answer that question it is necessary to consider the present state of international economic co-operation as organized and co-ordinated by the United Nations.”

   1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

6. “It is obvious that in order to bring the process of decolonization out of its present state of stagnation, it is necessary for the major Western powers, especially the United States and the United Kingdom, to end their direct or indirect support to reactionary régimes in South Africa, Portugal and Southern Rhodesia. It would then not be difficult to make those countries conform to the will of the international community, which demands the final elimination of the infamous colonial system. 72. The United Nations is faced with another important problem: the elimination of the economic backwardness of many countries as a result of prolonged colonial domination.”

   1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

7. “He speaks of “the perilous passage of more than one billion people from colonial status ... to juridical independence within the period of two decades”. He adds that for the United States, “...the demise of colonialism has meant not the interruption but the beginning of world involvement ...”, a process in which it has been propelled onto the power vacuums created by the “withdrawal of Europe“. Therefore, for some countries, the collapse of the colonial system, the struggle for freedom and national independence, the formation of independent States in Africa and in other continents spell a “political vacuum”, a “peril” to their interests, and disorder. They do not wish decolonization to proceed to its completion. 71.”

   1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

8. “Do the régimes in South Africa, Portugal and Southern Rhodesia really have the power to oppose the historical process of decolonization, the collective will of the international community and the struggle of the oppressed peoples? Of course not. It is not primarily from their national resources that these countries derive the political, financial and military means to preserve colonial régimes in Africa. These means are mainly provided through the assistance and support of a number of imperialist States and leading financial monopolies. 70. In this connexion may I quote statements made by Mr. George Ball, the former United States Under-Secretary of State, according to whom the disintegration of the colonial system would lead to “chaos” and “political weakness” in the world.”

   1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

9. “There has been a steady aggravation of colonial oppression and inhuman exploitation of the African peoples, of racism and apartheid, and of the cruel methods used against groups and individuals fighting for the rights and freedoms of oppressed peoples in South Africa, Southern Rhodesia and the Portuguese colonies. The Governments of these countries not only refuse to implement United Nations resolutions, but treat the most fundamental humanitarian principles with contempt. 69. One may therefore well ask what it is that prevents the realization of the aims proclaimed ten years ago in the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples [resolution 1514 (XV)].”

   1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

10. “My delegation hopes that the General Assembly will adopt a decision on the urgent need to conclude a convention on these particularly dangerous and barbarous weapons; this would constitute an outstanding achievement at the present session. As is emphasized in the letter from the nine socialist countries [A/7655], such a decision would be an important contribution to world peace. 67. The list of major international problems which are no closer to a solution is unfortunately very long. High on this list stand questions concerning the complete and final elimination of the colonial system and of under-development in the newly liberated countries. 68. It has frequently been pointed out at the present session that decolonization has come to a halt in recent years.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

11. “I have in mind in particular, the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons [resolution 2373 (XXI)]. We support the Secretary-General’s appeal to all States to ratify the Treaty so that it may come into force as soon as possible [see 4/7601/Add.1, para. 35]. 66. In connexion with disarmament, our country is at present devoting special attention to the question of the prohibition of the development, production and stockpiling of chemical and bacteriological (biological) weapons, and the destruction of such weapons. The particular importance of this problem is brought out convincingly in the report by the Secretary-General of the United Nations.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

12. “The achievement of further progress in the sphere of disarmament is an essential condition for relaxation of international relations and the restoration of confidence among States. 65. The conclusion of agreements for genuine disarmament would be the best proof that States did not intend to settle their difficulties by the use or threat of force. Past experience confirms that even the implementation of partial disarmament measures has a favourable influence on the international climate. The past few years have shown that given goodwill, such agreements are possible. Although they are only a start towards the limitation of the arms race, they are a good and encouraging start. At present the question is to prevent backsliding and to ensure that agreements already concluded do not lose their practical value.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

13. “Bulgaria has already taken numerous initiatives which have contributed to the improvement of the political climate of the Balkans, to the strengthening of mutual confidence and understanding between Balkan countries and to the development of their economic, scientific and cultural relations. The Bulgarian Government has concluded many agreements with its neighbours that have made it possible to solve numerous problems which have long hampered relations between the Balkan countries. Bulgaria is determined to continue its efforts for the further development of bilateral relations with the other Balkan countries so as to transform south-east Europe into a region of good neighbours, an essential element of collective security and co-operation in Europe. 64. Problems of international security are closely linked with problems of disarmament.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

14. “The very fact of its establishment would go a long way towards reducing the danger of a world war and safeguarding world security and peace. The achievement of this task would be one of the greatest victories of the peoples in their arduous struggle for a lasting peace. 63. As a Balkan country situated at the heart of the peninsula, the People’s Republic of Bulgaria attaches the greatest importance to its relations with the Balkan countries and to security and peace in the Balkans, a region where States with different social systems exist side by side. Undoubtedly this new Balkan situation will give rise to new problems, but it also creates new and greater possibilities for the fruitful development of relations between these States, based on the principles of peaceful coexistence.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

15. “The majority of European States received the Budapest appeal with interest and evaluated that important initiative by the Warsaw Treaty countries at its true worth. We rejoice to see that several European States have already indicated their desire and their willingness to facilitate the conference by taking measures to reduce tension and strengthen mutual confidence. In that context, the initiative taken by the Government of Finland with a view to the preparation of the conference on European security is to be warmly commended. This initiative is proof of the positive role that the neutral countries can successfully play in this field. 62. The establishment of a system of collective security in Europe would have far-reaching significance extending beyond the borders of our continent.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

16. “The Bulgarian Government considers that the establishment of an effective system of European security is undoubtedly a difficult task but one that can be achieved. Despite its complexity, the problem can be solved, given goodwill and realism, through the combined efforts of the Governments and peoples of all the European States, on the basis of recognition of the actual situation in Europe created as a result of the Second World War, on the basis of a general agreement to resolve controversial problems by peaceful means and negotiations, and, lastly, on the basis of respect for the interests of all European States. 61. An outstanding expression of the peaceful policy of the socialist countries was the Budapest appeal for the convening of a conference on European security.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

17. “But at the same time these countries do not cease to pursue their tireless and energetic efforts for a reasonable and mutually acceptable solution of European problems, for the lessening of tension and for the creation of favourable conditions for the consolidation of stability and security in Europe. They consider that the situation calls for a new approach and new methods for solving the problem of European security. It is not by perpetuating the division of the continent into hostile groupings but by creating an all-European system of collective security in the spirit of the Charter of the United Nations that the problems of most vital importance to Europe will be solved. 60.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

18. “They continue to resort to political conceptions and to methods which have been outstripped by the evolution of the European situation in the past few years. They remain rigidly bound to Atlantic political and military doctrines and systems, and show no desire to move towards solutions prompted by current European realities. What is the policy of those Western countries? It is still the policy of dividing Europe into opposing military blocs, tending to alter the relationship of forces in their favour, the policy of the arms race, of strengthening the spirit of revenge, of militarism and of neo-nazism in Western Germany. 59. It is obvious that the Warsaw Treaty countries cannot remain passive in the face of such a policy. They are taking the necessary measures to strengthen their political unity and their national defence.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

19. “Together with the other socialist States members of the Warsaw Treaty Organization, it has worked steadfastly for a relaxation of tension in Europe, for the development of economic, scientific and technical relations with all States and for a peaceful solution to the problems which continue to divide our continent. 58. The creation of a favourable political climate in Europe does not depend solely on the socialist States parties to the Warsaw Treaty. The support of the Western countries members of NATO is also essential. But the policy of some Atlantic Treaty countries continues to be a source of concern and perplexity. These countries still refuse to take account of the new political realities in Europe.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

20. “Another essential element of the USSR proposal for strengthening international security is the appeal to all States strictly to abide by the principles of peaceful coexistence in their international relations and to establish, by joint efforts, regional security systems in accordance with the provision of the Charter of the United Nations. 56. In that connexion I would like to dwell on a few questions concerning Europe. The peace and security of European countries depends first and foremost on relations between East and West. Those relations in turn depend on the strict and consistent observance of the principles of peaceful coexistence by the European States. 57. It is precisely those principles and concepts that inspire the Bulgarian Government.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

21. “There is, however, a real and equitable possibility of reaching a lasting political solution of the Middle East crisis, that is, through the immediate withdrawal of Israeli troops from the occupied Arab territories and the recognition of the right to an independent and secure existence for all the States of the region, including Israel. 54. The Bulgarian Government considers that no one has the right to ask the Governments and peoples of the Arab States to yield to aggression and to surrender their rights. It supports the just cause of the Arab peoples against aggression and occupation and for the establishment of a fair and lasting peace in the Middle East, as well as their efforts towards peaceful national development and social progress. 55.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

22. “It has declared that it will not accept the outcome of the negotiations between the four permanent members of the Security Council and it is undermining the mission of Mr. Jarring. The Israeli Government is not seeking a peaceful settlement of the Middle East crisis but the capitulation of the Arab countries, a radical modification of the map of the Middle East, and the annexation of a large part of the Arab territories. 52. What further aggravates the situation in the Middle East is the strong support given by the United States of America to Israel’s intransigent and provocative attitude. This biased and unjust attitude on the part of the United States of America is a negative factor which hinders rather than facilitates the settlement of the crisis. 53.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

23. “The statements made from this platform by the representatives of Arab countries — the United Arab Republic, Jordan, Lebanon and others — confirm once again the reasonable and constructive policy pursued by their Governments. 51. But what of the position of Israel? The Israeli Government persists in its total contempt for the Security Council resolution and has done nothing to implement it. Israel refuses to withdraw its troops from the occupied Arab territories. The occupation is accompanied by military action in the air and on land against the United Arab Republic, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon. Israel does not cease to put new obstacles in the way of a just and humane solution of the problem of the Palestinian refugees.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

24. “The Arab countries, which bear the heavy burden of the occupation of a large part of their territories, have accepted Security Council resolution 242 (1967) as a basis for a political settlement of the crisis. They have shown that they are willing to act in accordance with that resolution despite the new sacrifices it demands of them in the name of peace. Their position regarding the mission of Mr. Jarring, the Secretary-General’s Special Representative, and regarding the four-Power talks on the Middle East, is positive. The attitude of the Arab countries, victims of Israeli aggression, has created conditions favourable to the establishment of a just and lasting peace in that area, based on the principles of national independence, territorial integrity and mutual security.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

25. “My delegation fully agrees with the conclusion of the Secretary-General, U Thant, that the Middle East situation has continued to deteriorate [see 4/7601 /Add.1, para. 62]. The danger of a resumption of large-scale military activities is real and may lead to an extension of the conflict beyond the confines of the Middle East. For what reasons has the crisis in that troubled region not only not diminished but even worsened? What are the obstacles that frustrate attempts at a political settlement of the conflict? It is sufficient to examine the positions and the attitudes of the two parties to the conflict—the Arab countries and Israel — to find an answer. 50.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

26. “It can only seriously damage the Organization’s prestige. 48. The interests of peace in the Far East as well as the interests of the Organization call for a categorical decision: to withdraw all foreign troops from South Korea and to dissolve the so-called United Nations Commission for the Unification and Rehabilitation of Korea. The question of the country’s reunification by peaceful means and on a democratic basis can be decided only by the Korean people themselves, without foreign interference. The essential condition is the withdrawal from South Korean territory of all foreign troops, whose presence is the main cause of the division of the country and the major obstacle to peaceful reunification of the Korean people. 49.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

27. “But as long as aggression against the people of South Viet-Nam continues, the friends of the people of Viet-Nam will continue to help them in their heroic struggle for freedom and independence. 46. The presence of foreign troops in the territory of South Korea and the armed action and acts of provocation against the People’s Democratic Republic of Korea keep up the tension and constitute a serious threat to peace in that part of the world. The United States occupation troops are supporting a puppet government and are brutally interfering in the domestic affairs of the country, which they have transformed into a military base for a United States policy of aggression in Asia. 47. The United Nations flag cannot legalize the presence of United States troops in South Korea, any more than it can justify their acts of aggression.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

28. “Such limited measures cannot be interpreted as the expression of a genuine desire to reach an equitable solution of the Viet-Nam problem, but only as an attempt to justify the continuation of an unjust war. 44. The United States can only come out of this war with honour by immediately stopping the bombing of South Viet-Nam and starting the withdrawal of all its troops. That is the way to ensure that the Paris negotiations can break out of the deadlock caused by the United States policy of aggression in South-East Asia and that the necessary conditions can be created for the formation of a national coalition. Government. That is the way to achieve, not the “Viet-Namization” of the war in South Viet-Nam, as the United States desires, but the “‘Viet-Namization” of the peace. 45.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

29. “For nearly 15 years, day after day, year after year, the people of South Viet-Nam have, by their heroic struggle and their countless sacrifices, clearly demonstrated their inexorable will. What the people of Viet-Nam demand is the final and unconditional withdrawal of United States troops from the soil of Viet-Nam; the right and opportunity to settle their own affairs freely and without foreign interference or coercion, and to build a democratic and independent Republic of South Viet-Nam. If the United States of America really wants the end of the war in Viet-Nam, as it claims, it could prove it by appropriate measures which would facilitate a reasonable and just solution of the Viet-Nam problem at the conference table in Paris. 43. Declarations concerning a limited withdrawal of a few thousand troops cannot change the situation.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

30. “The world had every reason to expect that the United States of America would at last announce practical measures for a political settlement of the Viet-Nam problem, but that has not taken place. The United States Government has reaffirmed its decision to maintain its armed forces, to continue the war in Viet-Nam. The fact that this policy is accompanied by fine words does not change anything. Has not President Nixon himself declared that “noble rhetoric is no guarantee of noble results” [1755th meeting, para. 45]? 42. The United States Government has repeatedly stated that it is not what the United States wants for South Viet-Nam that matters, but what the people of Viet-Nam want for South Viet-Nam.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

31. “Fifteen years is long enough for even the United States Government to realize the impossibility of breaking the will of a people prepared to defend its freedom at any cost, to recognize that the war in Viet-Nam constitutes both an aggression against the people of Viet-Nam and a blow to the very foundations of world peace. 40. The United States of America maintains an army of more than half a million men in South Viet-Nam and has concentrated a large part of its immense war potential there. That is the sole obstacle to a peaceful and democratic solution of the Viet-Nam problem in accordance with the genuine aspirations of the people of South Viet-Nam. 41.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

32. “The development of the international situation clearly shows that it is impossible to solve such serious and acute problems as those of Viet-Nam and Korea, and of the Middle East, without the complete withdrawal of all United States troops from South Viet-Nam and South Korea, and of the Israeli troops from the occupied Arab territories. Unless these problems are solved, there can be neither lasting peace in the world nor real international security. 39. For 15 years, United States armed intervention in South Viet-Nam has been causing the people of Viet-Nam immense suffering.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

33. “The withdrawal of all troops from territories occupied as a result of action by the armed forces of some States against other States defending the independence they have won as a result of the collapse of the colonial system is an essential condition for improving the international situation. The presence of foreign troops in those territories is a constant source of tension and insecurity; it is a flagrant violation of the principles of national independence and freedom, of the right of peoples freely to choose their social systems and to settle their internal affairs themselves without foreign interference. 38.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

34. “The Bulgarian Government is convinced that approval of this appeal by the General Assembly and the adoption by Governments of appropriate measures for its implementation will constitute a major step towards strengthening international security and world peace — a great victory for the United Nations. 36. The appeal expresses the deepest sentiments of the world community; it takes account of the demand of the present international situation. One of the most serious problems now threatening peace is the armed intervention of certain States against other States and peoples. The appeal is right in emphasizing this crucial question. 37.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

35. “On the basis of this conviction, and taking into account the vital interests of peoples, the Soviet Government has submitted for consideration at this session an item entitled “The strengthening of international security” [A/7654]. The Bulgarian Government welcomes this new, important and positive initiative of the Soviet Union. It wholeheartedly supports the draft “appeal to all States of the world” on the strengthening of international security. This appeal is fully in keeping with the principles of the Charter of the United Nations and with the convictions and aspirations of our people. 35.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

36. “The problem of international security, of the elimination of the threats to world peace and to the life and well-being of peoples has therefore become acute. Collective measures are necessary to safeguard and build a just and lasting peace, to establish peaceful and fruitful relations between peoples in a climate of security, confidence and mutual respect. The need for such measures is pressing. Mankind cannot allow any further deterioration in the international situation or any delay or postponement of a solution to the most urgent international problems. Any delay might well lead the peoples to a situation where they no longer have it in their power to prevent a general confrontation. 34.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

37. “30. I should like to convey to you, Madam President, the congratulations of the delegation of the People’s Republic of Bulgaria on your election to the most important office in this Assembly and to wish you every success in the accomplishment of your task. 31. I should also like to convey to the delegation of Guatemala our most sincere condolences on the death of Mr. Emilio Arenales, President of the last session of the General Assembly. 32. The past year has not seen the realization of the peoples’ hopes for security and peace. It is true that no fresh sources of tension and no new open conflicts have developed, but not one of the conflicts which for years have been poisoning the international climate, not one of the major problems threatening world peace, has been settled. Some problems indeed have been seriously aggravated. 33.”

    1969-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 24 (1969)

38. “In this connexion, I should like to state that our delegation is in full agreement with the clear statement made by our Secretary-General, U Thant, in the introduction to his last annual report: "There is but one true answer to violence, duress and intimidation among States; the answer must be found in a resolute rejection of violence and a determined resistance to it by that vast majority of men and women throughout the world who long to live in peace, without fear. This would be a movement of mankind to save mankind." (A/6701/Add.1, para. 153).”

    1967-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 22 (1967)

39. “The absence of the People's Republic of China from the United Nations diminishes the effectiveness of this Organization in solving important international problems. 114. The twenty-second session of the General Assembly must face up to important problems, The United Nations is called upon to play an active role in international events and in the peaceful development of the present-day world. However, there still exists forces which seek to arrest the course of history and hinder the activities of the United Nations. But we are firmly convinced that if the progressive forces in the world are mobilized to a greater degree, the Organization will move forward along the path to peace and progress.”

    1967-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 22 (1967)

40. “For these reasons, we consider it necessary that the German Democratic Republic, which is pursuing a constructive policy of peace and security, should have the opportunity to accede to multilateral conventions concluded under the auspices of the United Nations and to take part, on an equal footing, in the work of international conferences and other international gatherings organized by the United Nations. The German Democratic Republic has asked to become a Member of the Organization. This request should meet with a favourable response. 113. The restoration of the legitimate rights of the People's Republic of China in the United Nations, together with all the consequences resulting therefrom, has for a long time been a compelling need.”

    1967-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 22 (1967)

41. “We share the concern of the Secretary-General and are ready to support any effort designed to overcome the policy of discrimination against certain States, a policy which is aimed at preventing their participation in multilateral conventions concluded under the auspices of the United Nations and in international conferences convened at the initiative of this Organization and at depriving them of the right to send observers to the United Nations or to become Members of the Organization or its specialized agencies. 112.”

    1967-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 22 (1967)

42. “As the most fully representative international Organization, the United Nations can make an important contribution to the affirmation and application of this principle. 111. In the introduction to his annual report (A/6701/ Add.1), the Secretary-General drew the attention of Member States to the fact that the Organization has not yet succeeded in translating the principle of universality into fact.”

    1967-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 22 (1967)

43. “The fact that the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany still refuses to recognize the consequences of the Second World War and the realities of post-war Europe, that it stands by its unfounded claims to represent the whole German people, and that it is trying to isolate the German Democratic Republic politically and to gain access to nuclear armaments, all serves to demonstrate the alarming nature of its policy. That policy, which is supported by certain States, members of the Atlantic Alliance, constitutes an obstacle to the further improvement of the political climate in Europe and to a constructive solution of many of the important problems besetting the European States. 110. One of the characteristic features of present-day international relations is the universalization of relations between States.”

    1967-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 22 (1967)

44. “In view of the fact that some Governments regard the simultaneous dissolution of the blocs as premature, more limited interim decisions could be agreed upon as a first step, such as the conclusion of a non-aggression treaty between the Atlantic Alliance and the Warsaw Treaty Organization, or the disbanding of the military organizations of those blocs. 108. Of course, the situation in Europe is far from being idyllic. There too there exist complex problems and considerable difficulties. There is no reason for complacency as far as Europe is concerned. 109. The problem which is crucial for the peace and security of Europe is that of the militaristic and revanchist attitude of West Germany, its plans for remaking the map of Europe and the chauvinistic atmosphere in which German fascism is once more emerging.”

    1967-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 22 (1967)

45. “It is convinced that the time has come for a European security system to replace the system of multilateral military alliances. Quite recently, the President of the Council of Ministers of Bulgaria, Todor Jivkov, confirmed once again, on behalf of the Bulgarian Government, that we are ready for the simultaneous dissolution of the Atlantic Alliance and the Warsaw Treaty. This would be an important first step in reducing international tension and in helping to bring about a favourable atmosphere and the political and psychological conditions necessary for the establishment of an efficient European security system. 107.”

    1967-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 22 (1967)

46. “The solution to this question should be approached in a new way, without adhering to obsolete forms of security which were able to avert neither local conflicts nor world wars. Examples of these are still fresh in the memory of the European peoples. 106. Consequently, the point of departure in finding a solution to the problem of national security should not be the concept that the best way of guaranteeing such a solution is the setting up of military blocs and alliances pitted against one another and bearing in them the seeds of fear and of the danger of future confrontation, but the establishment of a harmonious collective system in which general and lasting peace would be the very foundation of independence and national security. Our country shares these ideas.”

    1967-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 22 (1967)

47. “It is a fact that the majority of European States have, over the last few years, adopted a realistic attitude with regard to the situation in Europe and are trying to base their relations on the principles of peaceful coexistence. Thanks to this policy, confidence among the European people is growing, relations between Eastern and Western States are improving and the tension in Europe is diminishing. 105. The progress so far achieved should be continued. The growing confidence and mutual respect among the European States may then give rise to favourable conditions which would make it possible to find a solution to the basic problem of Europe, the setting up of an efficient system of European security. This problem is occupying the attention of European peoples and Governments for whom national security is of primary concern.”

    1967-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 22 (1967)

48. “It would also be useful if the General Assembly were to recommend to the specialized agencies and international organizations affiliated to the United Nations to furnish more active assistance to the movements of national liberation in their efforts to ensure education for the youth of the colonial territories, to organize medical services, to wipe out epidemics and to guarantee that the children are fed. This is a wide field in which the humanitarian ideals of our Organization can be applied. It is with this in mind that my delegation has asked that the question concerning the implementation by the specialized agencies of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples should be inscribed on the agenda for the present session.”

    1967-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 22 (1967)

49. “The fourth summit Conference of the Organization of African Unity, held at Kinshasa in September 1967, and the decisions taken at that Conference represent an encouraging step towards the consolidation of the African States and the liberation of African territories and peoples still suffering from oppression. Until this goal is reached, the United Nations will have to play an essential role in bringing about the final elimination of colonialism. Hence it is desirable that the General Assembly should address an even more insistent appeal to Member States to provide more effective moral and material support to the peoples struggling for their freedom and to cease all co-operation with the colonialist and racist regimes. 104.”

    1967-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 22 (1967)

50. “The alliance between the racists of South Africa and Southern Rhodesia and the Portuguese colonists is an obstacle to the suppression of colonialism in Africa and a threat to the independence of the newly liberated countries in that part of the world. 102. The final elimination of colonialism and the achievement of a process of national liberation of peoples are vital necessities in our era, and it is the duty of free peoples to bring them about. All anti-colonialist forces must resolutely oppose the efforts made to arrest this process. 103.”

    1967-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 22 (1967)