YouSaid · the spoken record

Pandit

THE RECORD WRITES THIS SPEAKER AS PANDIT

lines on the record: 74
first: 1946-09-24
most recent: 1952-09-24
sittings or episodes: 4
sources: un-general-debate

Every line below is reproduced as it was said and linked to the record it came from. Nothing here is summarised or generated. Directory · Search · Corrections

“The great Powers whose unity seven years ago brought the edifice of the United Nations into bring and whose differences today threaten to destroy it, shoulder a tremendous responsibility for the maintenance of world peace. We hope that they will continue to serve that end despite differences in ideology, and that others, like ourselves, who appear in me words of the poet to "only stand and wait”, will also serve in their own humble way.”
1952-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 7 (1952)
“Failure to achieve economic and social objectives will mean the disillusionment of peoples. 24. We are 360 million, and if we succeed in our plans to raise the standards of living and bring our people the fruits of prosperity and progress, we shall be creating conditions of enduring stability in Asia. Our thoughts and actions are therefore riveted to that task. 25. One last word. These past seven years of varied fortunes of this Organization have brought both success and failure, That the failures have been great may be a cause for distress but not for despondency. We, of the Indian delegation, believe that only faith in the purposes and principles of the Charter and action in the national and international spheres in accordance with them will bring the peoples of the world together into closer understanding and collaboration.”
1952-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 7 (1952)
“We are convinced that such reconstruction must be based primarily on our own effort, and that the wealth of a country lies essentially in and with its own people. But we believe also that co-operative effort through international agencies must be further promoted in order to quicken the process of development. 22. The establishment of agencies for ensuring the flow of capital for development, the provision of financial assistance for essential projects like land reform or the utilization of natural resources, technical and other aids to increase productivity, these and many others must be undertaken ,by the United Nations in its great objective of strengthening the foundations of peace. 23. These matters are of vital concern, especially to the recently emancipated countries like India, .and generally to the under-developed countries.”
1952-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 7 (1952)
“Our people expect, more than before, quick solutions for their numerous economic and social problems. Our independence in 1947 brought us, however, the legacy — and with it also the problems — of an under-developed country. The conditions of hunger, disease and ignorance are a challenge to national statesmanship everywhere, but in our country the challenge becomes the more formidable because of the accident of natural calamities and the strains and stresses inevitable at the end of a long war. Believing as we do that the sources of a country's strength must lie within it and not outside, we have first set out to put our house in order. 21. In the economic and social spheres, our five-year plan is designed to harness all our resources, human, technical and natural, to the task of economic anti social reconstruction.”
1952-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 7 (1952)
“Following upon the framing of our new Constitution which has established a secular democratic republic, we have held our first general election, To grant adult suffrage without distinction of class, religion, race or sex meant a single electoral roll of a 172 million men and women, the largest electorate in the world, and 105 million voters exercised their vote. The orderliness with which the elections were conducted and the grasp of political issues which the voters revealed have been of the utmost encouragement to us, and are facts of considerable significance. 20, That, however, is only the first step on the road to real democracy. We realize that a heavy responsibility rests on the central and State governments which have come into existence as a result of these elections.”
1952-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 7 (1952)
“They have not resorted to violent rebellion, though there have regrettably been sporadic outbursts by other groups during tire last few days, the full reasons for whim are not yet known to us, The "passive resisters” have followed the inspiring example of Mahatma Ghandi and are enduring, in a disciplined manner, imprisonment and even whipping for daring to assert their rights to these fundamental freedoms to which we are all pledged. Such a demonstration of spiritual strength can never prove futile, and I should like to take this opportunity of paying tribute to the courage and sacrifice of these men and women and to give them the assurance that there is a large measure of appreciation all over the world for their heroic stand. 19, I wish, now to refer to an event in India which has occurred since the last session of the General Assembly.”
1952-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 7 (1952)
“This policy is a serious menace to ell that the United Nations stands for, and my delegation earnestly hopes that this session of the General Assembly will recognize the potential dangers of the situation and deal with it in a manner that will bring peace and contentment to the peoples of South Africa. 18, Here I should like to tell the representatives that, even as we meet here today, thousands of men and women belonging to different groups in South Africa have united and launched a movement of passive resistance against the wrong being done to them.”
1952-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 7 (1952)
“It was handled by the parties concerned with realism and statesmanship, and the results are seen today both in terms of goodwill and in the awakening of the other peoples of Asia to their new responsibilities, We hope that similar realism and statesmanship will be applied to similar movements in other areas, 17, Elsewhere on the African continent, the situation is fast deteriorating owing to the pursuit of a racial policy supported by a series of legislative and executive measures designed to perpetuate the domination of one race over others. The bitterness created by it is sowing the seeds of a conflict which may overwhelm the entire continent.”
1952-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 7 (1952)
“We, as Members, are in fact pledged to take joint and separate action for the achievement, among other things, of “friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of… self-determination of peoples”, We therefore trust that the United Nations will support the assertion and the attainment of that principle by the peoples of Tunisia and Morocco. 16. I should like to emphasize the fact that new life is stirring in the continents of Asia and Africa, of which the General Assembly should take due note. In the first half of the present century, we saw the emergence In Asia of a movement for self-expression and self-development.”
1952-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 7 (1952)
“It is their legitimate aspiration, and we had thought that the political wisdom and sense of history of the great Power governing their destinies would lead to a statesmanlike approach to the problems arising out of their demands. This is not the occasion for replying to the leader of the French delegation, who made a statement yesterday [392nd meeting], and my delegation proposes to deal with the question in detail in the committee concerned. One of the achievements of the United Nations is that its efforts brought freedom to Indonesia and Libya, and other peoples naturally look to this Organization for similar support.”
1952-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 7 (1952)
“It is a hopeful feature of this year’s session of the General Assembly that several delegations have referred to the importance and urgency of solving colonial problems. We were in particular impressed by a notable passage in the speech; of the leader of the United States delegation [380th meeting], in which he pointed out that of 800 million dependent people in, the world at the end of the Second World War, no less than 600 million had achieved their freedom in these few years. That great fact, of which we in Asia are deeply conscious, is proof of the change which is fast coming over the world today. It has implications which go far beyond the territories which have attained freedom. 15. We deeply sympathize with the peoples of Tunisia and Morocco in their desire for self-government.”
1952-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 7 (1952)
“I referred to Korea at the outset because the continuance of hostilities there is the most immediate challenge to the peace-making functions of the United Nations, but there are other dangers to peace in other parts of the world which are not the less threatening because they are less apparent. I refer to the situation arising from the continuance of colonial rule over peoples who are fast awakening to political consciousness. 14. The transition from such rule to self-government must be effected smoothly and with speed, India has always taken a keen and active interest in the problems of peoples of dependent areas, whether they are Non- Self-Governing or Trust Territories. “The dignity and worth of the human person” springs to life and vitality only under-freedom.”
1952-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 7 (1952)
“Until the issue of Chinese representation is settled in accordance with the actual facts of the situation, our discussions here must continue to be unreal. On such problems as, for example, the reduction of armaments and armed forces, the absence of the representatives of China, in our view, is a serious limitation. We hope that renewed thought will be given to this matter, 12. We also hope that in the discussions on the question, of the admission of new Members, a step forward will be taken at this session to break the deadlock by the recognition of the principle of universality of membership. Without it, our Organization cannot deal effectively with the problems arising in different parts of the world. 13.”
1952-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 7 (1952)
“Our immediate task, therefore, is to end hostilities and, with that object, to explore every avenue to bring about a quick settlement of the only issue which now stands in the way of an armistice. We have not given up hope that the difficulties in the way of a solution will prove surmountable, and we trust that wisdom, perseverance and patience will lead to agreement between the parties themselves. An armistice in Korea, however, is but the first step towards the task of unification and rehabilitation of that country, 11. With respect to the larger problem in the Far East, our position is well known. I must, however, restate the view of my Government, namely, that the Central People’s Government of China should be brought into the United Nations.”
1952-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 7 (1952)
“Few of us can escape responsibility for this tragic state of affairs, and none dare think of the terrible alternative, should our efforts finally fail In the words of our Prime Minister, “there are no halfway houses left for its; we can work wholeheartedly with all the strength in us to prevent the calamity of war; or we can allow the world to sink into an abyss which will bring us to uttermost destruction, and min the proud structure of present day civilization”. 10. The problem of paramount importance before this General Assembly is that of peace in Korea, Day after day, as we debate this issue in committee, fighting continues, men are killed and rival armies move up and down that unhappy country, which is now a heap of ruins.”
1952-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 7 (1952)
“This year we meet again in an atmosphere of mounting crisis. The maintenance of peace and security is our common purpose: yet we have not so far succeeded in achieving it, Fighting goes on in Korea; armaments continue to be piled up. Today, seven years after the termination of the Second World War, we are as far from the settlement of Germany and Austria as we were the first year after the war.”
1952-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 7 (1952)
“In that and other ways, India had tried to do all it could to reaffirm its faith «in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women...» and «to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom. » Those were the words of the Charter, and India had shown, in the shaping of its Constitution that to it they were no empty phrases but a living inspiration. Nothing would deflect India from the resolute pursuit of those great ideals, neither adverse circumstances nor obloquy nor misunderstanding, because those ideals were in full accord with the noblest traditions of Indian culture.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“Copying a step taken by the United States of America in 1946, it had provided for the periodic appointment of commissions to investigate the conditions of any under-privileged classes of the population. Anticipating one of the recommendations of the Civil Rights Committee appointed in the United States of America, it had provided for the appointment, both for the Union of India and for each of the States, of special officers to see that the rights guaranteed by the Constitution were not violated in the day-to-day administration of the country. Adult suffrage for men and women was to be the basis of all elections.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“Its allegiance to the principles of the Charter of the United Nations was not mere lip service. In a few weeks, India would be framing its new Constitution, embodying all the ideals of its new freedom. The Wain provisions had already been settled. It had taken from France the inspiring ideas of liberty, equality and fraternity — which, indeed, most countries had. It had taken from the United States of America the idea of a bill of rights enforceable by the courts. It had taken from the United Kingdom the idea of an independent judiciary, the bulwark of British freedom. It had taken from the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics many provisions for the benefit of the common and forgotten man. Remembering that India was to be a secular State, it had provided every possible safeguard for the protection of minorities.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“The Prime Minister of India had made India’s intentions clear in a recent broadcast: as soon as the immediate task of restoring normal conditions was completed, steps would be taken for the election of a constituent assembly which would determine the constitutional structure of Hyderabad. The election would doubtless be held under the same conditions as similar elections elsewhere in India, on the basis of adult suffrage and with all the usual safeguards against intimidation and corrupt practices of all kinds. It would be just as public as any general election in the United Kingdom or the United States of America. India had nothing to hide. Its only desire was that the rule of law and the will of the people should prevail. India had faith in democracy.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“It is impossible for any fair-minded person in the outside world to view the present Government of Hyderabad but as one representing and indeed dominated by a party which commands support of only part of the minority community in the State; nor, to the best of my knowledge, is it responsible to the Legislature. «I do not personally believe that friendly relations between India and Hyderabad, which we are agreed are the necessary prelude to a satisfactory long-term settlement, can come so long as the state of affairs to which I have referred above exists. I am not saying this as Governor-General of India. I am saying it as an impartial observer and as a well-wisher of Hyderabad. » Unfortunately, the appeal had fallen on deaf ears. But that already belonged to the dead past of history; she would not dwell on it.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“Pandit quoted, stating that comment was superfluous, from a published letter written in April 1948 by the then Governor-General of India, Lord Mountbatten, to His Exalted Highness the Nizam of Hyderabad: «You will have noticed that during the course of the last few months, the ruler of nearly every State in this sub-continent which is in relationship with the Dominion of India has introduced, or has declared his intention of introducing in the near future, truly responsible and representative government. I say «nearly every State», for there is one exception: Hyderabad.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“In the last twelve months India had realized, as few other countries had, the dangers of mass disorder and fratricidal strife, and its anxiety to root them out from a region situated in the very heart of its territory required no explanation. If they could be rooted out with the same speed from Palestine, Burma, Malaya and elsewhere, the world could be a happier and more secure place to live in. Mrs.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“After a series of warnings and appeals, India had chosen the former course and had intervened. It was significant that leading Muslims in all parts of India had welcomed the action taken by India in Hyderabad. That all resistance had collapsed within five days had been mainly due to the fact that the people of Hyderabad, irrespective of caste and creed, were behind India’s action and had heartily welcomed the restoration of order. She was well aware that phrases like « law and order» and «the will of the people» had often been used in the past, and were perhaps still being used by certain countries today, to cloak sinister designs. That had helped some people to spread libellous stories of India’s coercion of a so-called weak and helpless State. She gave the assurance that India had no sinister designs and nothing to cloak.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“I am certain about this: either we suppress this gangsterism ruthlessly, or we abdicate.» The Prime Minister, vainly attempting to persuade him to reconsider his resignation, had written: « I agree that there have been several unhappy incidents during the past few months, owing to various reasons.» Another minister of the Hyderabad Government, who had resigned on 28 July 1948 had spoken of a complete reign of terror in certain districts, of men murdered, women dishonoured, houses burned. In the face of this mounting evil, fomented by a clique of self-seekers, the choice before India had not been between violence and non-violence, but between the adoption of firm measures by the State against the evil-doer and the continuance of murder and arson and looting on a large scale directed against innocent men, women and children.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“January 1948, a minister of the Hyderabad Government, in tendering his resignation to the Prime Minister, had said: « It pains me to be a member of a Government which allows looting, arson and murder unconcernedly; and that of my own brethren. The Bibinagar outrage, a report of which has been brought to me by a responsible person deputed by me especially for the purpose, has shocked me beyond all expression.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“Since her arrival in France, nothing had roused her indignation so much as the constant and persistent misrepresentation and misunderstanding of the action which India had felt obliged to take in Hyderabad a few days previously. Of the legal aspect of the matter she would say nothing; she was at present concerned only with the moral issue. People often asked how it was that, while professing Gandhi’s doctrine of non-violence, India should yet have thought fit to resort to the use of force in Hyderabad. To those who knew the facts, the surprise was not that India had intervened but that India had not intervened much earlier. As long ago as 24.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“Pandit felt that the Assembly would expect her to say a word or two on the matters which were in the minds of most people when they thought of India at present — Kashmir and Hyderabad. On Kashmir she did not need to say much. The United Nations had appointed a commission of mediation (S/654), which had been in India since the previous July. In spite of certain misgivings, India had co-operated fully with the Commission and had endeavoured to make its labours fruitful. The Commission would soon prepare its interim report and present it to the United Nations. Meanwhile, it was best for all concerned to say nothing, except to express the hope that the report might pave the way to the speedy restoration of peace. On Hyderabad Mrs. Pandit had to speak more fully.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“In education, public health and agriculture, in irrigation and hydroelectric projects, in the building of roads of all kinds, from national highways to village tracks, in the improvement of the conditions of labour, both industrial and agricultural — indeed, in all that concerned the daily lives of the three hundred million people of India — there had been achievements of which Indians could legitimately be proud. Twice within the course of the current year, India had appeared before the Security Council. On the first occasion, it had been on its own initiative, in the hope that the Security Council would investigate the causes of its dispute with Pakistan about Kashmir. More recently, India had appeared before the Security Council in response to the complaint made against it by the Nizam of Hyderabad. Mrs.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“India’s faith in the democratic way of life was deep and enduring and therefore it could never pursue an aggressive policy. Mrs. Pandit flung back that charge in the face of those who had had the audacity to make it. In spite of those difficulties and mistakes, India, under its present leaders, had made great and striking progress in many directions, and the direct consequence would be the raising of the standards of life for the common man.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“Violence had raised its head in many parts of India and Pakistan and, early that year, India had made the supreme sacrifice of Mahatma Gandhi, under whose guidance and inspiration its freedom had been won. She stood before the Assembly in all humility and admitted that India had been unworthy of its great leader. The new Government of free India had had to face numerous and formidable problems. It had made many mistakes during the current year, even some serious mistakes, but the mistakes had been more or less inevitable in the exceptional circumstances in which India had found its freedom. But of one mistake it had not been guilty. India was not an aggressor nation, and had no aggressive intentions towards anyone, outside or inside its borders.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“The Indian delegation was uncompromisingly opposed to racial discrimination in whatever form and wherever it existed and asked the Assembly to devote its serious attention to rooting out the canker of racialism from the world. When Mrs. Pandit had last addressed the General Assembly on a similar occasion a year ago (85th meeting), India had just attained its freedom. She had ventured to express its hopes; but even more than its hopes, she had stressed the dangers confronting India and its newly won freedom. During those twelve months India had passed through a period of storm and turmoil which had more than confirmed its worst apprehensions.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“When a Member State came to the rostrum of the General Assembly and spoke of the basic principles of the Charter being violated, one was entitled to ask whether a policy of racial segregation, pursued without the least regard for every one of those basic principles, of restrictive laws and measures affecting the political and economic rights of certain races, was in keeping with the allegiance Members professed to the Charter. The General Assembly would be guilty of shirking one of its most onerous responsibilities if it did not question the propriety of Member States penalizing certain sections of their people on racial grounds.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“India was glad to welcome its friend and neighbour, Burma, in the United Nations. Its satisfaction was, however, tinged with regret at the tragic events which had taken place in Burma, not the least of which had been the loss of some of Burma’s ablest leaders. One of the greatest problems with which the world was faced et present was the continuing practice of racial discrimination in certain parts of the world. That was one of the gravest dangers to world peace. India would not tolerate distinctions which offended against the dignity of the human person. Something that had been said from the rostrum on the previous day (141st meeting) about relations between European and non-European races being poisoned compelled her to make an observation on the allegation that the Assembly had been misused on certain occasions.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“Pandit said that that region, which had been one of the strongholds of colonialism, was slowly emerging into freedom and was faced with internal travail and the opposition of vested foreign interests which usually accompanied the birth of freedom. These were evident in Indonesia, in Indo-China and in Malaya. India had the deepest sympathy for the people of those countries in their struggle for freedom. It considered that Indonesia had reached a stage of autonomy which entitled it to the recognition of its sovereignty, and hoped that Indonesia would soon be welcomed as a Member of the United Nations. The people of Viet-Nam had been fighting gallantly for their freedom. India hoped that the French Government and people would rise to the full height of their traditional liberalism so that Viet-Nam might attain self- government.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“Those peoples read the solemn declarations made about the fundamental freedoms of all mankind, and they were asking whether those declarations were meant to apply to them, as they did to the Members of the United Nations. Could it be maintained, without a threat to world peace developing, that the General Assembly had no authority to ask the colonial Powers for concrete proofs to demonstrate that they were doing everything possible to hasten the development of self-government among the colonial peoples? India believed in the establishment of a permanent committee under Chapter XI, which would do for the Non-Self-Governing Territories what the Trusteeship Council was doing for the peoples of the trusteeship areas. With regard to conditions in South East Asia, Mrs.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“India regretted the attempt in some quarters to whittle them down and was disturbed at the appearance of the forces of reaction in regard to which the representative of the Philippines had recently given such eloquent expression (139th meeting). The Indian delegation, believing in the freedom of all peoples, wished to see the early termination of the colonial system, and the speedy attainment of self-government by all peoples inhabiting colonial or Trust Territories. It insisted on the strict observance of Chapters XI and XII, both in spirit and letter. In particular, it urged the colonial Powers to realize that the two hundred million people inhabiting the Non-Self-Governing Territories read into the provisions of the Charter relating to such territories far more than the colonial Powers were inclined to do.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“As had been emphasized by the Secretary-General, almost as important as the elimination of atomic weapons was the outlawing of biological and chemical warfare, which was said to have been perfected to such an extent as to threaten the very existence of mankind. The General Assembly must devote serious attention to those matters. The present session would be called upon to consider colonial and trusteeship problems arising from Chapters XI and XII of the Charter. The views of the Indian delegation on such matters, which had been pressed at the last two sessions of the Assembly, were well known. Those provisions of the Charter it regarded as among the most vital.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“Her delegation shared the regret of the General Assembly that many months of effort by the Atomic Energy Commission had proved fruitless, and that the Commission, faced with a deadlock, had suspended its activities. As an under-developed country, India was interested in the use of atomic energy for peaceful and beneficent purposes. It trusted that a fresh approach would be brought to the question of the utilization of atomic energy for such purposes and for the elimination of the weapons of war, and earnestly hoped that the present deliberations would pave the way for the reconciliation of opposing points of view. No progress had been made with the question of disarmament. It was obvious that the threat of war could not be banished from the world unless the present race for armaments was abandoned.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“It was India’s view that, if the world should be divided into two distinct and opposing groups, a future conflict would become inevitable, and within the General Assembly itself the formation of Power blocs would interfere with that undivided allegiance which Member States owed to the Organization. India saw danger in the lesser loyalties which bound those groups together prevailing over the larger loyalty which all Members owed, through the United Nations Charter, to the peoples of the world. Many momentous questions were to be dis- cussed in the present year. In the view of the Indian delegation one of the most important items was the problem of atomic energy control and disarmament.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“India had tried to judge all questions before the General Assembly as objectively as possible. For India the spirit of the Charter meant much more than its letter. India had, in the past, avoided alignment with any one bloc — an attitude which had often been misunderstood. Indians were, however, convinced that that stand was correct even if it entailed some temporary disadvantage. It was not based on any weakness, but the result of the conviction that by avoiding to be grouped with any bloc of Powers, in however small a fashion, India was helping in the maintenance of peace.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“Serious disagreement had developed over the peace treaty for Germany, the deadlock in Berlin, the control and use of atomic energy, disarmament, and the creation of a world force, to mention but a few examples. Every field of international endeavour was threatened by the ever-widening gulf between the major Powers. So long as the shadow of conflict hung over the councils of the world there could be no progress and no sense of security. The disappearance of that harmony among the Big Five which, while it had lasted, had been the greatest single factor in winning the most deadly war in human history, now endangered the peace of the world. The responsibility of the Big Five was far heavier than it had ever been, and greater than ever before was the need for tolerance, moderation and a spirit of accommodation in all their deliberations.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“During that period the United Nations had been faced with many grave problems, and it would be a dangerous self-delusion to say that they had been tackled successfully. But the lack of success had not been due to any lack of courage or enterprise on the part of the United Nations. The mistakes made were mainly due to the fact that Members of the United Nations had not been true to the spirit of the Charter. There had been a disturbing tendency for legal arguments to be regarded as more important than human and moral considerations, which tendency was leading to the undermining of the Charter. That attitude was also responsible for accentuating disharmony between the big Powers. The General Assembly was meeting at a time when differences between the big Powers were most acute.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“Mrs. PANDIT declared that it was a matter of satisfaction to her delegation that the resent session of the General Assembly was being held in Paris. India had received much inspiration from France. India’s struggle for freedom, its thought and ideals had been influenced by France. The Indian people had loved France and what it had stood for; they had been grieved during the unhappy period when Frances freedom had suffered a temporary eclipse; and they rejoiced that France had again taken its rightful place in the world. The three years that had passed since the creation of the United Nations had not been easy ones. The peace which had emerged from the travail of a lengthy war was an uneasy peace and apprehensions of another war already threatened mankind.”
1948-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 3 (1948)
“We are indeed more firmly convinced than ever that the only way to avert a catastrophe, the only road to peace and freedom and well-being for us all, is through our steadfast and wholehearted cooperation, at whatever inconvenience, within the framework of the United Nations and in the spirit of the Charter. On behalf of my Government, once again I give you the pledge of our fullest co-operation and our determination to do all that lies within our power to see that the establishment of the United Nations shall, in future, mark the beginning of a new and less unhappy chapter in human history.”
1947-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 2 (1947)
“The conflict of ideology, or whatever it may be, that is plunging the world into gloom and tension, seems so sadly irrelevant to these great human problems; problems that vitally affect a half, and perhaps more than a half, of the world’s population. Our Organization, the United Nations, has no “ism” of its own; it embraces all “isms” and ideologies; it embraces all civilizations of the West and of the East; its principles cannot be said to derive exclusively from either or any of the contending doctrines. That is why, in this most critical time, and notwithstanding the discouraging factors, we continue to place our faith in it.”
1947-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 2 (1947)
“Machinery, new or old, by itself, will not save us if we are not truly and sincerely determined to remove war as a means of settling differences. It has now become almost a platitude to say that a clash of ideologies underlies the rift that is so noticeable in the world today. We who come from the East, who are intimately familiar with the dire want, the poverty and suffering and starvation that prevail there, may be forgiven for thinking that ideology is less important than practice. We cannot eat an ideology; we cannot brandish an ideology, and feel that we are clothed and housed. Food, clothing, shelter, education, medical services — these are the things we need. We know that we can only obtain them by our joint efforts as a people, and with the help and co-operation of those who are more fortunately circumstanced than ourselves.”
1947-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 2 (1947)
“To those nations that work with this aim we shall gladly offer our full co-operation. The Indian delegation feels that what is important today is not to set about revising the Charter, or to divert our energies and devise complicated ingenious amendments. The important thing today is that we should all observe faithfully the spirit and the letter of the Charter, its principles and procedures, not only when it is convenient to us, not only when it helps us to pursue aims and policies which may have no connexion with the Charter, but at all times and in relation to all problems and difficulties. If we are not prepared to implement the Charter in this spirit, I fear that no modification or revision, no addition or abrogation of a phrase here and an article there, will greatly improve the position. It may well have the opposite effect.”
1947-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 2 (1947)
“We, in India, for our part, are aware of no compulsion to identify ourselves wholly, or to associate ourselves systematically, with either or any of the different groups. On the contrary, we consider it of paramount importance that the distance between them should be narrowed down. We believe that our conduct should conduce to that end, and that there are standards and principles and ideals that transcend merely national interests, that transcend the exigencies of the kind of power politics that has proved so calamitous in the past. Accordingly, we shall offer our support to, or withhold it from, the proposals submitted to us, solely in the light of our judgment of the merits of the case in question. We stand for peace, and will devote our resources and energy towards the abolition of all causes which lead to war.”
1947-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 2 (1947)
“It must be recognized, however, that every international question may be regarded as having a national aspect, and we cannot afford to permit a Member State to evade its obligations and thus reduce the value of the Charter. I have only touched on some of the more important questions that occur to us when we consider the functioning of the United Nations during the past year. I am not wholly satisfied — indeed, none of us, I believe, is wholly satisfied — with the work we have accomplished and the results we have achieved. Millions of humble folk in all countries are alarmed and bewildered, unable to comprehend fully those mighty forces which are driving the great Powers into unfriendly groupings, carrying with them by some sort of magnetic pull numbers of other States as well.”
1947-09-24 · UN General Assembly · General Debate, Session 2 (1947)