YouSaid · the spoken record

Celem

lines on the record: 83
first: 1995-09-08
most recent: 1997-12-19
sittings or episodes: 13
sources: un-security-council

Every line below is reproduced as it was said and linked to the record it came from. Nothing here is summarised or generated. Directory · Search · Corrections

“As pointed out by the Secretary-General in his last report, "Much has been achieved, but much also remains to be done." [S/1997/966, para. 45] At this volatile stage of the peace process, it is essential that the international community continue to exert itself persistently in order to achieve a lasting peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina.”
1997-12-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3842Resumption (1997) · source
“As urged by the Organization of the Islamic Conference Contact Group on 7 December 1997, the international community must disburse expeditiously the funds pledged for the rehabilitation and reconstruction programme of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Implementation Force (IFOR) has played a crucial role in preserving peace and order and in ensuring progress on the peace process in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Turkey believes that the Stabilization Force (SFOR), as the successor to IFOR, has been indispensable for the maintenance of a stable security environment essential for deterring or, if necessary, halting a resumption of hostilities. We welcome the emerging consensus on the need for a military presence in Bosnia and Herzegovina to continue beyond June 1998.”
1997-12-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3842Resumption (1997) · source
“Economic revitalization is essential for the process of reconciliation, the improvement of living conditions and the maintenance of durable peace, both in Bosnia and Herzegovina and in the region. However, we are dismayed that the package of essential legislation establishing the common institutions of economic management has not been implemented in full; nor has the State-level legislation specified in the Sintra Declaration been adopted. We hope that necessary steps will be taken immediately, so that Bosnia and Herzegovina can have an economic policy framework which would allow it to start taking advantage of the multilateral economic assistance already available.”
1997-12-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3842Resumption (1997) · source
“Turkey welcomes the positive steps taken towards a normalization of relations between the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) and Bosnia and Herzegovina. However, there is ample room for progress in this respect. Therefore, we call upon the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) to fulfil immediately the requirement of establishing full and unconditional diplomatic relations with Bosnia and Herzegovina. We believe that such a development will provide the necessary tool to remove some of the existing hurdles on the road to normalization. Turkey also welcomes the successful conclusion of the local elections of 13 and 14 September 1997. We expect full and unconditional implementation of the election results. Any attempt not to implement them will hamper the delicate process underway.”
1997-12-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3842Resumption (1997) · source
“At this juncture, it is important to recall that, under the Dayton Accord, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) is responsible for the Serbian entity's cooperation and compliance, as well as its own. Security Council resolution 1088 (1996), the Sintra Political Declaration of the Ministerial Meeting of the Steering Board of the Peace Implementation Council and, just recently, the Bonn Peace Implementation Conference all confirmed that international economic aid is conditional upon compliance with and implementation of the Peace Agreement. In this regard, we would like to stress the need for timely information about the level of cooperation and compliance so that necessary assessments can be made.”
1997-12-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3842Resumption (1997) · source
“Turkey supports fully the efforts of the International Tribunal aimed at the prosecution of persons responsible for serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in the territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991 and believes that States and parties to the Peace Agreement must meet their obligations to cooperate with the Tribunal. The conclusions of the Peace Implementation Conference on Bosnia and Herzegovina held in Bonn drew particular attention to the failure of the authorities of the Republika Srpska entity of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) to carry out their obligations. It is the duty of the international community to exert the necessary pressure on the parties which do not live up to their legal obligations of cooperating with the Tribunal.”
1997-12-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3842Resumption (1997) · source
“We welcome this unanimous decision reaffirming its concern about non-compliance with the peace agreement and demonstrating its willingness to take the necessary measures in its power to obtain full implementation. For this purpose, it is essential that all the conditions envisaged by the Dayton/Paris Peace Agreement - inter alia, cooperation with the International Tribunal, the return of refugees and displaced persons to their homes and the establishment of common institutions - materialize without delay. It is not possible to overstate the importance of the work of the International Tribunal for the process of reconciliation in Bosnia and Herzegovina.”
1997-12-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3842Resumption (1997) · source
“In order to heal the wounds of the war and to attain lasting peace, it is incumbent upon the international community to exert every effort to help Bosnia and Herzegovina in its arduous endeavour for reconciliation and reintegration. Turkey, along with other States, is actively participating in the implementation of both the military and civilian aspects of the Dayton/Paris Peace Agreement and is ready, on its part, to continue doing so. With its resolution 52/150, the General Assembly recently reiterated its full commitment to the stabilization and consolidation of peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina and reconciliation among its constituent peoples.”
1997-12-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3842Resumption (1997) · source
“As accurately reflected, most recently in the conclusions of the Bonn Peace Implementation Conference of 9 and 10 December 1997, the fragility of the situation in the country compels us to maintain a stable security environment. The Secretary-General's reports of 8 September and 10 December 1997 and the latest report of the High Representative for the implementation of the Peace Agreement on Bosnia and Herzegovina all point to the fact that the peace process has not yet become irreversible. In this respect, I would like to reaffirm Turkey's full support for the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the annexes thereto. They constitute the basis for the establishment of a durable and just peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina.”
1997-12-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3842Resumption (1997) · source
“At the outset, my delegation would like to commend the Costa Rican presidency and the Security Council for scheduling an open debate on this very important subject at this crucial stage. We expressed our views in depth on the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina in the General Assembly in the debate under agenda item 47 three days ago. Therefore, I will be brief. It is noteworthy that considerable progress has been made in implementing peace and stability in Bosnia and Herzegovina since the signing of the Dayton/Paris Peace Agreement. The fact is that, since the signing of the Peace Agreement, considerable progress has been achieved in the military field. Nonetheless. lack of compliance on some crucial civilian aspects of the Agreement indicates that the task undertaken by the international community is far from complete.”
1997-12-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3842Resumption (1997) · source
“The operation has effectively contributed to the fulfilment of one of the main purposes enshrined in the Charter of this Organization, the maintenance of peace and security; it has also contributed to the stability of one Member country, Albania. Now is the time for the fulfilment of another main purpose: to achieve international cooperation in solving Albania's economic, social, cultural and humanitarian problems. My Government will, as always, continue to support Albania, with which we share close historical and cultural bonds, both through bilateral arrangements, and by assuming its part of the responsibilities in collective efforts in international forums.”
1997-08-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3811 (1997) · source
“The multinational protection force was only one part of a large scale international effort to help bring about peace and stability to Albania and to assist it in resuming its progress on the road to full political, economic and social recovery. The contributions of other international organizations should also be mentioned, especially the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) which, by providing the coordinating framework for international assistance to Albania, has been instrumental in the joint efforts for the containment and elimination of the crisis. But the real work begins now. Continued international support is necessary for lasting stability and development in Albania.”
1997-08-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3811 (1997) · source
“In any case, the operation in Albania was successful. It enjoyed the full cooperation of the Albanian authorities and particularly of the Albanian people. The Turkish contingent fulfilled its task in a friendly and cooperative atmosphere. Planning and coordination among the troop- contributing States secured a smooth operation. It was thus possible for the Albanian people to hold the parliamentary elections that paved the way for the resolution of the crisis. My Government welcomed the elections as a first step in providing the basis for the lasting solution of Albania's problems through democratic means.”
1997-08-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3811 (1997) · source
“Those resolutions provided the framework for an operation limited in purpose and duration, but capable of meeting the requirements of the mission. The operation itself acquired an ad hoc character of its own. It was not a United Nations peacekeeping effort in its classic meaning. It is possible that, in the future, such a method could be contemplated and employed with respect to other contingencies. As a matter of fact, the arrangement foreseen in resolution 1125 (1997) for the Central African Republic could be considered another example of a new form of peacekeeping operation. The peacekeeping effort in Bosnia has also turned into a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) peacekeeping operation with similar features. We believe that the advantages and disadvantages of such undertakings are worth closer examination.”
1997-08-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3811 (1997) · source
“As will be recalled, the initiative for finding an effective solution to the problem emanated from the political will of the Albanian leadership. It was the Albanian Government which asked for the assistance of the international community, and Member States and friends and neighbours of Albania felt duty-bound to provide that country with the necessary and firm support that enabled it to move forward rapidly on the road to peace and stability. This support was given through the multinational protection force, within the legal framework drawn up in resolutions 1101 (1997) and 1114 (1997). In this respect, Italy deserves the appreciation of the world community for the leadership role it has undertaken in this act of international solidarity. Turkey was among the sponsors of both of those resolutions.”
1997-08-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3811 (1997) · source
“Albania and its friendly people have passed through very difficult times. These difficulties were, to a great extent, the result of a painful process of adaptation to a new political, social and economic order. Peace, security and stability on the Balkan peninsula, of which Turkey is a part, has become all the more critical in view of the long ordeal of the breakup of Yugoslavia. We viewed the crisis in Albania against that background. We were convinced that ensuring internal peace and stability in Albania was a prerequisite for the preservation of peace and stability in the region. As a matter of fact, our contingent in the multinational protection force was only a reflection of Turkey's continuing interest in and commitment to regional stability and international peacekeeping efforts.”
1997-08-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3811 (1997) · source
“We should, in particular, strictly refrain from military involvement and interference in the internal affairs of Afghanistan. For its part, Turkey is ready to do what it can to contribute to the normalization of the situation in that friendly country. We will wholeheartedly continue to support the Secretary-General's efforts to this end, as well as those of the United Nations Special Mission to Afghanistan. I would also like to remind the Council once again that, if and when the Secretary-General decides that an intra-Afghan meeting among the warring parties will contribute to peace efforts, Turkey stands ready to host such a meeting.”
1997-04-15 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3765Resumption1 (1997) · source
“We should not lose sight of the fact that the developments in Afghanistan seriously threaten the stability and security of the region as a whole. My country has close ties, deeply rooted in history, with Afghanistan and the Afghan people. We feel very strongly about the sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity and national unity of Afghanistan. For the unity of the country and for the benefit of the people of Afghanistan, the Afghan leaders should respond without delay to appeals of the friends of Afghanistan to cease the hostilities and to engage in negotiations for a peaceful solution. We, the Member States of the United Nations, and especially those closest to Afghanistan, should try only to bring about a negotiated settlement of the Afghan problem.”
1997-04-15 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3765Resumption1 (1997) · source
“We strongly believe that there is no better way to achieve peace in Afghanistan than by initiating a healthy dialogue between the various factions. One of the major obstacles to convincing the faction leaders that a military solution is not only undesirable but also unattainable is the continuing supply of weapons, military equipment and ammunition from outside. As long as such foreign interference continues, the sides, and especially the Taliban, will see no incentive to desist from pursuing the military option. In this respect, we all should realize that, under present conditions, not only are the well-being and humanitarian requirements of the Afghan people at stake, but, above all, its national unity. There exists a real and, in fact, a growing threat of division along ethnic lines.”
1997-04-15 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3765Resumption1 (1997) · source
“The three Ministers reaffirmed their readiness and determination to give their full support to the Afghan people, in the direction of the goals set by the United Nations. Turkey also carried out contacts with each of the warring factions with a view to exploring whether we could be of any assistance in bringing them to the negotiating table. Although initial reactions from all the sides were favourable, at a late stage one of the parties indicated that it was unable to attend. In the light of all these developments, it is our opinion that the immediate goal, as clearly set out in the report of the Secretary-General, and as pursued by the United Nations Special Mission to Afghanistan, should be to convince the sides that military ascendancy by one over the others will not serve, in the long run, the interests of Afghan people.”
1997-04-15 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3765Resumption1 (1997) · source
“It is most unfortunate for the long-suffering people of Afghanistan that the warring factions, and in particular the Taliban, appear determined to pursue the military option. It is therefore necessary to bring the Taliban into the negotiation and reconciliation process. As has also been emphasized in the Secretary-General's report, the possibility of an increase in the military activity of the Taliban will emerge when favourable weather conditions prevail in the coming months. This is the imminent threat that we are facing. Within the context of trying to contribute to the efforts aimed at finding a solution to the crisis in Afghanistan, the Foreign Ministers of Iran, Pakistan and Turkey met in Istanbul on 5 January 1997.”
1997-04-15 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3765Resumption1 (1997) · source
“There have also been efforts, including those of my country, in support of United Nations efforts to bring the same parties to the negotiating table to help them reach a certain common ground and thus contribute to finding a solution to the crisis. As we understand from the Secretary-General's report, very limited progress was achieved during the Intra-Afghan Working Group meetings convened by the Special Mission. However, a notable aspect of that Working Group was that it brought together, for the first time, the Taliban and the Supreme Council for the Defence of Afghanistan. As confirmed by the report of the Secretary-General, the political situation in Afghanistan has not improved over the past months. The humanitarian situation has even worsened.”
1997-04-15 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3765Resumption1 (1997) · source
“At the outset, I would like to express our appreciation to Secretary-General Kofi Annan for his comprehensive, to-the-point and valuable report on the situation in Afghanistan. We concur with the observations and recommendations in his report. Since the last meetings of the General Assembly and the Security Council on this subject and the meeting of interested countries here in New York, a considerable amount of time has passed. In this period the United Nations Special Mission to Afghanistan, headed by Mr. Holl, has made concerted efforts to make further progress in bringing together the warring parties and to achieve the urgent task of establishing a ceasefire, which could then be the basis for an improvement in the political and humanitarian situation in Afghanistan.”
1997-04-15 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3765Resumption1 (1997) · source
“In this vein, I wish to reiterate Turkey's unwavering support for and belief in the Middle East peace process, which we deem the only rational path leading to a just, comprehensive and lasting peace in the region. To achieve this goal, we expect the parties to contribute positively to the process on the'basis of Security Council resolutions 242 (1967) and 338 (1973). Therefore, my Government urges the Government of Israel to reconsider and reverse its policy of resuming such settlement activities in Jabal Abu Ghneim and other occupied areas.”
1997-03-05 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3745 (1997) · source
“At a time when the commitment demonstrated by the Israeli Government to the established parametres of the peace process was rekindling our hopes for the future of the Middle East, the decision to allow construction in Jabal Abu Ghneim has once again caused deep worries about the success of the process. Any decision that could affect the outcome of the final-status talks should not even be considered until the successful conclusion of the talks. How long can such vacillations continue before the process is dealt a blow from which it cannot recover? The future not only of Al-Quds Al-Sharif, but of the entire Middle East peace process, hangs in the balance.”
1997-03-05 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3745 (1997) · source
“The chain of reactions provoked by that decision to open an archaeological tunnel passing under the Al-Aqsa Mosque complex should have taught a lesson to all the parties involved on what not to do at this critical point in time. Unilateral actions that may adversely affect the peace process must be avoided at all costs. So far, much has been achieved in peacemaking between the Arabs and the Israelis, leading very recently to the protocol on Al-Khalil and finally clearing the way for the final-status talks, which will also include the negotiations on the future of Al-Quds Al-Sharif.”
1997-03-05 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3745 (1997) · source
“The Turkish Government is seriously concerned about the latest decision of the Israeli Government to approve a housing construction project in the Jabal Abu Ghneim region of Al-Quds Al-Sharif, in defiance of the relevant Security Council and General Assembly resolutions. Although it is sugar-coated with the simultaneous approval of scattered housing construction projects for the Arab population of Al-Quds, everyone is aware that the Israeli Government views this project as a method to preempt the outcome of the negotiations on the final status, particularly on the future of the Holy City -- equally holy for all three monotheistic religions. The tragic events of last September, following another decision of the Israeli Government regarding a holy site _ again in AI-Quds -- are still vivid in our minds.”
1997-03-05 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3745 (1997) · source
“There is no doubt in our minds that the draft resolution before the Council will send the right and a clear message in this respect.”
1996-12-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3723 (1996) · source
“We would like to emphasize that it is very important for the Security Council to reaffirm its full support for the sovereignty, legal continuity and territorial integrity of Bosnia and Herzegovina and to call upon those who are obstructing the peace process to comply fully with the relevant provisions of the Dayton Peace Agreement and its annexes, including the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina. We also take this opportunity to call upon all parties to cooperate fully with SFOR and with the International Police Task Force. In conclusion, this is the most appropriate time to show that the Security Council is strongly committed to supporting and ensuring compliance with the provisions of the Peace Agreement and that it expects all parties to do the same.”
1996-12-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3723 (1996) · source
“As indicated in the statement of the Ministerial Meeting of the North Atlantic Council held in Brussels two days ago, NATO is prepared to organize and lead a Stabilization Force (SFOR), to be authorized by a United Nations Security Council resolution under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter, to take the place of IFOR. Turkey believes that SFOR, as a successor to IFOR, will contribute to a secure environment necessary for the consolidation and stabilization of peace and deter or, if necessary, halt a resumption of hostilities. The duration of the SFOR mission is also significant to its success. Turkey is also prepared to contribute to SFOR.”
1996-12-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3723 (1996) · source
“The fragility of the general situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina requires that the international community move with caution and determination in contemplating the future of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is significant to note that IFOR has brought together 33 NATO and non-NATO countries in an unprecedented coalition for peace, stability and political and economic reconstruction. Although IFOR's mission has been accomplished, an international military presence is still required to provide the stability necessary to consolidate the peace.”
1996-12-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3723 (1996) · source
“It ought to be seen as a goodwill gesture of the international community in encouraging the Republika Srpska to become a unifying element and a reliable partner of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Security Council resolution 1074 (1996), in its operative paragraph 5, does not rule out the reimposition of the sanctions if any party fails significantly to meet its obligations under the Peace Agreement. This fact is also recognized in the fifth paragraph of the guiding principles of the civilian consolidation plan of the peace process. The Implementation Force (IFOR), led by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), has played a crucial role from the time it was deployed until now in preserving peace and order and in ensuring progress on the rough road the peace process has been travelling on.”
1996-12-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3723 (1996) · source
“Turkey also welcomes the conclusion of the meeting of the Ministerial Steering Board of the Peace Implementation Council and the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina held in Paris on 14 November 1996, in order to define the guiding principles of the civilian consolidation plan of the peace process in Bosnia and Herzegovina in accordance with the Peace Agreement. Lastly, Turkey welcomes the conclusion of the Peace Implementation Conference held in London on 4 and 5 December 1996, at which the Bosnian parties and the international community committed themselves to a detailed action plan to implement the Peace Agreement. In this respect, we would like to point out that lifting of the economic sanctions should not be seen as a lack of resolve on the part of the international community.”
1996-12-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3723 (1996) · source
“On the reconstruction front, we are pleased to note the positive impact of the two previous pledging conferences held on 21 December 1995 and 13-14 April 1996 and chaired by the World Bank and the European Union. We believe that we cannot overemphasize the urgency of providing the pledged financial and technical assistance to the reconstruction efforts. Economic revitalization is essential for the process of reconciliation, for the improvement of living conditions and for the maintenance of durable peace both in Bosnia and Herzegovina and in the region.”
1996-12-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3723 (1996) · source
“We also welcome the subregional arms control agreements signed in Vienna on 26 January 1996, and in Florence on 14 June 1996, as vital instruments in ensuring regional stability. However, we are alarmed by reports of non-compliance by some parties with the provisions of these agreements. The international community's unwavering attention to the implementation of these instruments is also crucial for the realization of peace, security and stability in the area. We hope that the irregularities and violations encountered, especially by Bosnians, at the 14 September election will be eliminated in the future and that, with the cooperation of all parties with the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), free and fair elections throughout Bosnia and Herzegovina can be realized at the municipal/local level promptly.”
1996-12-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3723 (1996) · source
“Unfortunately, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) has been portrayed as a party with an almost equally dismal record of cooperation with the Tribunal. It is important to note that, under the Dayton Accord, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) is responsible for the Serbian Entity's cooperation and compliance as well as its own. Turkey welcomes the positive steps taken toward a normalization of relations between the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) and Bosnia and Herzegovina. We encourage the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) to fulfil the requirement of establishing diplomatic relations with Bosnia and Herzegovina without any preconditions. We believe that such a development will eliminate another hurdle en route to normalization.”
1996-12-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3723 (1996) · source
“In this context, we would like to draw the attention of the Security Council to the third annual report of the International Tribunal, which in part states: "The degree of cooperation encountered has varied remarkably among these States and Entities. The Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina has been by far the most cooperative party: it has replied to nearly every warrant addressed to it, explaining its inability to execute arrest warrants in Bosnian territories outside its control". (5/1996/665, para. 167) In the report, it is also stated that the Republika Srpska has failed to execute any of the scores of arrest warrants which have been addressed to it or to explain its inability or failure to do so.”
1996-12-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3723 (1996) · source
“We call upon all parties, including the relevant international organizations and Member States, to contribute to the formation of conditions necessary to facilitate their return. We would like to stress the importance of the work of the International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia for the process of reconciliation in Bosnia and Herzegovina among its constituent peoples. Turkey supports fully the efforts of the International Tribunal aimed at the prosecution of persons responsible for serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in the territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991 and believes that States and parties to the Peace Agreement must meet their obligations to cooperate with the Tribunal.”
1996-12-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3723 (1996) · source
“We feel duty-bound to continue observing the level of compliance of the parties with the implementation of the Dayton Peace Agreement. Turkey strongly opposes the selective approach adopted by the Serbian Entity with regard to the implementation of certain provisions of the Agreement. For this purpose, it is essential that all the conditions envisaged by the Dayton Peace Agreement, including the return of refugees and displaced persons to their homes, are put in place without delay. While we welcome the attention given to the protection and promotion of human rights in Bosnia and Herzegovina and to the establishment of the new common institutions in accordance with the provisions of the Peace Agreement, we regret the continuing obstruction faced by the refugees and displaced persons wishing to return to their homes.”
1996-12-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3723 (1996) · source
“In this respect, we would like to express our full support for the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the annexes thereto signed in Paris on 14 December 1995, which constitute the key mechanism for the achievement of a durable and just peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina, as well as for stability in the region and for reintegration of the country at all levels. The international community has to exert every effort to help Bosnia and Herzegovina on this path, and also in the reconstruction efforts under way, in order to heal the wounds of the war and to achieve peace, security and stability in this vitally important country of Europe. Turkey, along with other States, is actively participating in the implementation of both the military and civilian aspects of the Dayton Peace Agreement.”
1996-12-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3723 (1996) · source
“The situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina continues to occupy a very important place in the agenda for peace and security in the Balkans and beyond. The developments which took place prior to the Dayton Peace Agreement proved once again that a lack of firm and prompt international response to aggression leads to further aggravation of crises, causes untold human suffering and makes it all the more difficult to find solutions. We have witnessed this tragic development in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Dayton/Paris Peace Agreement therefore constitutes a turning point in the unfolding of the events in Bosnia and Herzegovina.”
1996-12-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3723 (1996) · source
“My country will continue to follow developments in Afghanistan closely and remain ready to do whatever it can to contribute to the normalization of the situation in this brotherly country. As already declared by the Turkish Foreign Minister at the General Assembly almost a fortnight ago, we stand ready to hold a meeting in Turkey with the participation of all parties to the Afghan conflict, under the auspices of the United Nations, to help to bring about reconciliation and a settlement based on the territorial integrity, sovereignty, independence and unity of Afghanistan.”
1996-10-16 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3705 (1996) · source
“We therefore appeal once again to all sides in the Afghan conflict, in particular to their leaders, to lay down their arms and agree on a national reconciliation process conducive to the restoration of Afghan statehood. In this respect, my country attaches special importance to the continuation of the constructive role the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) has been playing to forge a common understanding among the parties in Afghanistan and welcomes the recent decision of the Secretary-General of the OIC, Mr. Hamid Algabid, to send another OIC mission to Afghanistan. We understand that the efforts of the OIC will be conducted, as in the past, in close cooperation and coordination with the United Nations Special Mission and will be complementary in nature to those of the United Nations.”
1996-10-16 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3705 (1996) · source
“Holl, to bring together the leaders in Afghan groups in order to negotiate an immediate and durable ceasefire and to resolve their internal political differences. This will facilitate national reconciliation with a view to the restoration of a fully representative, broad-based Government and also to the start of the process of rehabilitation and reconstruction of this country, as affirmed in the preambular part of General Assembly resolution 50/88 B. It should be stressed, however, that the primary responsibility for bringing the devastating war in Afghanistan to an end lies with the warring parties, as the destiny of Afghanistan can and will be determined only by the people of the country.”
1996-10-16 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3705 (1996) · source
“We also fully support the statement made on 28 September 1996 by the President of the Security Council on behalf of the Council, by which the Security Council reaffirmed its commitment to the sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity and national unity of Afghanistan. In these circumstances, what is most urgently needed is an immediate and unconditional cessation of all armed hostilities. That should be the principal objective of all efforts by the international community aimed at bringing peace to Afghanistan. Otherwise, it will not be possible to envisage an effective process of national reconciliation. It is time for the Security Council to give a new impetus to the efforts of the United Nations Special Mission in Afghanistan, headed by Mr.”
1996-10-16 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3705 (1996) · source
“With this resolution, we, the Member States, committed ourselves: "(a) To respect Afghanistan's sovereignty and territorial integrity, strictly to refrain from interfering in the internal affairs of Afghanistan and to respect the right of the Afghan people to determine their own destiny; (b) To take all steps necessary to promote peace in Afghanistan, to stop the flow of arms and of equipment related to arms production to all parties and to put an end to this destructive conflict." (resolution 50/88 B, para. 9) At this stage, these two points constitute the cornerstone of the international community's responsibility towards Afghanistan.”
1996-10-16 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3705 (1996) · source
“Today, the developments in Afghanistan are a matter of grave concern and anguish for us because they are rapidly acquiring a dimension which, through a possible spillover effect, might threaten peace and stability in the entire region, leading to a crisis situation of unmanageable proportions. The situation in Afghanistan clearly warrants the continued concern of the international community, which has identified the essential political elements for the restoration of peace and a return to normalcy in Afghanistan. These elements are contained in General Assembly resolution 50/88 of 19 December 1995, adopted by consensus.”
1996-10-16 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3705 (1996) · source
“The consequences of this enormous human tragedy have affected large segments of the population, devastated the entire country, and dashed the hopes and expectations of millions of people both inside and outside Afghanistan. Most discouraging of all is that the military option still seems to be the course of action preferred by the parties. These parties show no genuine desire for a serious dialogue which, in our opinion, remains the only way out of the present impasse. It does not take a prophet to state that the continuation of this senseless civil war will produce no winner. It will simply bring more destruction to Afghanistan and further suffering to its people.”
1996-10-16 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3705 (1996) · source
“The question of Afghanistan is once again on the agenda of the Security Council. My delegation welcomes this timely meeting as an opportunity to focus the attention of the international community on the serious and deteriorating situation in Afghanistan. My country's close ties with Afghanistan and the Afghan people are deep-rooted in history. I would go so far as to say that a special relationship exists between my country and Afghanistan. We are deeply concerned about the recent turn of events in Afghanistan. The encouraging changes that took place on the Afghan political scene, after a long and painful struggle for the liberation of the country, have gradually been overtaken by developments that deepen our pessimism. It is regrettable to note that the fratricidal conflict continues unabated.”
1996-10-16 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3705 (1996) · source
“This spontaneous reaction has to be taken into consideration. We cannot afford to see the further spread of demonstrations, further bloodshed and further human suffering. We cannot afford to see the Middle East peace process thrown into total disarray. Information obtained this morning indicates that the situation is even more tense. We call on both sides to exercise restraint and to refrain from actions that may be exploited by parties that are against the peace process. We think that it is vitally important at this juncture that Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Arafat meet immediately to find a way out of this crisis. We call upon the Israeli Government to review its decision concerning the tunnel and to refrain from resorting to the use of force or from any action that can be construed as provocation.”
1996-09-27 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3698Resumption1 (1996) · source