YouSaid · the spoken record

Haroon

lines on the record: 396
first: 2008-11-19
most recent: 2012-09-20
sittings or episodes: 41
sources: un-security-council

Every line below is reproduced as it was said and linked to the record it came from. Nothing here is summarised or generated. Directory · Search · Corrections

“We also look forward to other forthcoming international engagements on Afghanistan, in Moscow on 27 March, The Hague on 31 March and Trieste on 26 and 27 June. Pakistan attaches high priority to close, friendly and cooperative relations with Afghanistan. The new democratic Government of Pakistan has made a promising beginning with Afghanistan. There have been a number of bilateral interactions at the highest level. We are making steady progress in building a relationship of deeper trust and understanding. The reinvigorated Jirga process provides a useful means for promoting dialogue and development. During the visit of President Zardari to Afghanistan in January 2009, the two sides signed an historic joint declaration on future directions and bilateral cooperation.”
2009-03-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6094 (2009) · source
“It is a member of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation, it is a member of the Economic Cooperation Organization, which earlier this month held its tenth summit meeting in Tehran, which also hosted the first Afghanistan-Iran- Pakistan trilateral summit. The second trilateral summit of Afghanistan, Pakistan and Turkey took place earlier in Istanbul in December 2008. Pakistan will host the third Regional Economic Cooperation Conference on Afghanistan in Islamabad in May. Building on the Kabul and Delhi conferences, the Islamabad meeting will focus on five major themes - mining, health, trade and transit, labour movement and human resources development, and energy and infrastructure, including the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan- Pakistan-India gas pipeline project.”
2009-03-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6094 (2009) · source
“Pakistan will provide all possible support for the successful conduct of elections. Fifthly, any strategy should accord priority and allocate resources for the repatriation of the millions of refugees from Pakistan. A pull factor needs to be created inside Afghanistan to encourage the voluntary return of refugees. Regional cooperation is the key to sustainable peace and development in Afghanistan. A regional approach has to take into account the interests, the capacities and the aspirations of sovereign States and their peoples. It should build solid stakes in lasting peace. Afghanistan's integration in regional mechanisms is encouraging.”
2009-03-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6094 (2009) · source
“Thirdly, a massive investment in reconstruction, development and social welfare is required with the participation of all segments of Afghan society. The benefits of development, rather than insecurity, chaos and deprivation, should become the talk of the town. The drug problem must be dealt with comprehensively in the context of development through the provision of alternative livelihoods. Fourthly, in the battle for hearts and minds, persuasion must override force and coercion. An inclusive process based on dialogue and broad national reconciliation can catalyse the consolidation of gains from the international efforts in Afghanistan. The forthcoming election offers an excellent opportunity to harness reconciliation and promote inclusion through a democratic process.”
2009-03-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6094 (2009) · source
“What is required is a fuller understanding of the needs and priorities of the Afghan people and respect for their traditions, values, culture and religion. We agree with the Secretary-General that the strategy must be to prioritize, rationalize and Afghanize. In our view, the following should be the elements of any constructive engagement. First, we must ensure a comprehensive, coordinated and balanced approach. It is evident that reliance on military means alone cannot deliver peace. Secondly, for durable stability, people must assume ownership. There should be enhanced focus on indigenous and national capacity-building in all fields, from governance to security, in order to reduce reliance on external support.”
2009-03-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6094 (2009) · source
“Are militancy and terrorism being reined in, or are they spreading? How successful are the military strategies? How adequate and effective is the non- military component? Has international assistance brought about a tangible improvement in the lives of the ordinary people? Are we winning the hearts and minds of the people of Afghanistan? If there is to be a rule of thumb to follow in answering these questions, it should be to ask why so many millions remain refugees in appalling conditions in neighbouring countries. Afghanistan can best cope with its challenges without intervention or interference. However, this should not mean disengagement and abandonment. As many speakers have mentioned, this has happened in the past.”
2009-03-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6094 (2009) · source
“Cooperation under the tripartite military commission has proven useful, and we wish to see this mechanism further strengthened. We are concerned about the financing and arming of militants and recent incursion of militants into our territory. There is an additional security risk posed by the millions of refugees remaining within Pakistan. I am sure that as the international community reviews its strategy to achieve the common objective of peace in Afghanistan, we will be guided by lessons of history and past mistakes in this dispassionate stock- taking. We should assess why, seven years on, despite having made some notable gains in Afghanistan through heavy investments and sacrifices, the situation does not give rise to much optimism. Are the underlying causes of insecurity being effectively addressed?”
2009-03-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6094 (2009) · source
“To deal with this menace, the Government is pursuing a comprehensive and multi-pronged strategy, partly through a resolution of parliament structured around democracy, dialogue and development. This approach is being pursued with the support, cooperation and ownership of both populations. Our message is unequivocal. The territory of Pakistan will not be allowed to be used for terrorist activities, while our sovereignty and territorial integrity must also be fully respected. We are doing our utmost to control and interdict illegal movement across the difficult border with Afghanistan. We have established approximately 1,000 checkpoints and deployed more than 120,000 troops on our side of the border. Reciprocal measures on the other side of the border can complement and reinforce this effort.”
2009-03-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6094 (2009) · source
“Popular grievances arising from various causes, ranging from civilian casualties to socio-economic hardships and lack of governance and development, are further compounding the situation. Terrorism remains a major challenge. It has roots in all parts of the world. Together with Afghanistan, Pakistan faces the brunt of the terrorist and extremist threat. In 2008 alone, nearly 2,000 Pakistanis lost their lives in over 600 terrorism-related incidents in Pakistan. Pakistan's economy has suffered directly and indirectly, with losses in the billions. However, this has not diminished our commitment to curb and reverse the menace of terrorism and extremism.”
2009-03-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6094 (2009) · source
“I would like to thank the Secretary-General and Mr. Eide for the most recent report (S/2009/135), which, to my mind, provides an objective overview of the situation in Afghanistan. The challenges are well-known, from security to political, humanitarian and development issues. The challenges are multifaceted, daunting in scope and closely interlinked. They require a truly comprehensive, substantial and integrated response that is fully owned and led by the Afghans, with the sustained and long-term attention and support of the international community. The ongoing concern remains the increased violence and insecurity, which continue to be rooted in the complex interplay of Taliban, Al-Qaida, warlordism, factional rivalries and the activities of illegally armed and criminal groups and are fuelled by the illicit drug trade.”
2009-03-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6094 (2009) · source
“The refugee influx into Pakistan remains of amazing proportions, and this is only one side of the reality. We have a vital stake in the peace and stability of Afghanistan. The destinies of our two peoples are as closely interlinked in the future as they were in the past. It is with this perspective and deep commitment that we participate in this debate on Afghanistan. The United Nations has a central role in mobilizing and coordinating international action in support of Afghanistan, and the challenging circumstances of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA), led by Special Representative Kai Eide, cannot be underestimated. It is a major contribution and will remain crucial to any settlement that will be defined in conferences around the world for many months to follow.”
2009-03-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6094 (2009) · source
“All day, we have had the pleasure of hearing many countries state their intent with regard to Afghanistan. At this time in the evening, it must be said that Ambassador Tanin has done a great job, as evidenced in the immense feeling of goodwill that has been expressed throughout this meeting for him and for his country. I offer him my congratulations. Allow me to thank the Council for the opportunity to participate in this discussion, as this issue is of vital importance for my country and peace in the region. We feel the pain and untold suffering endured by our brothers in Afghanistan, who have been the victims of history, circumstances and unrelenting conflict for many years. For three decades, Pakistan has suffered with our Afghan brethren, and the fallout of the instability and conflict has affected us grievously.”
2009-03-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6094 (2009) · source
“That is a cherished objective, the realization of which the Security Council and the entire international community must devote full and sustained attention and all the resources at their disposal. Success demands nothing less.”
2008-12-18 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6049Resumption1 (2008) · source
“We therefore reiterate the call for a just, comprehensive and lasting peace based on international law, and full implementation of the relevant United Nations resolutions and agreements and obligations of the parties. Pakistan will remain steadfast in extending its full support for the achievement of the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people to exercise self- determination and sovereignty in the independent and viable State of Palestine, on the basis of the pre-l967 borders, with Al-Quds Al-Sharif as its capital, and a just resolution of the Palestinian refugees issue, in accordance with General Assembly resolution 194 (III) of 11 December 1948.”
2008-12-18 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6049Resumption1 (2008) · source
“Israel must cease the policy of forcibly establishing facts on the ground, fracturing Palestinian society, changing its demographic structure and fragmenting the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem - all actions that jeopardize the negotiations and the process of a viable and contiguous State of Palestine. Seventh, the international community must support the efforts aimed at achieving inter-Palestinian reconciliation, which is a must for credible and comprehensive peace. We urge our Palestinian brothers to put aside their differences and pool all their energies in the pursuit of peace. Pakistan remains deeply concerned by the protracted suffering and dispossession of the Palestinian people. It is high time for this human tragedy, inflicted and aggravated by decades of occupation, to be brought to an early end.”
2008-12-18 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6049Resumption1 (2008) · source
“Particular responsibility lies with the occupying Power, both in Palestine and in Kashmir. In order to demonstrate its credibility and desire for peace, such Powers must seriously reconsider their policies and unilateral actions, which in this case are imperilling the lives of a besieged Palestinian people as well as the peace process and do not serve Israel's own security concerns. Israel must shun the use of force, put an end to human rights violations, discrimination, social and economic strangulation and collective punishment of the Palestinian people, immediately halt the construction of the illegal separation wall, stop its colonization campaign of settlement and demolish outposts, as promised at Annapolis, and remove the blockade of the Gaza Strip.”
2008-12-18 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6049Resumption1 (2008) · source
“As stipulated in resolution 1850 (2008), the parties must fulfil their respective obligations under the Road Map and refrain from any steps that could undermine confidence or prejudice the outcome of negotiations. Israel must stop its military campaigns in the occupied territories, which continue to cause considerable and injuries and loss of innocent life, including among Palestinian women and children. The firing of rockets into Israel, which does not serve the Palestinian cause, must also stop. We reiterate that the killing of all civilians or any civilians is unacceptable. All sides are called upon to shun violence and respect their respective obligations under international human rights law and international humanitarian law, in particular the Fourth Geneva Convention.”
2008-12-18 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6049Resumption1 (2008) · source
“We would like to take this opportunity to reiterate our call for parallel progress on the Syria-Israel and Lebanon-Israel tracks in order to achieve comprehensive peace in the Middle East. Sixth, the impediments for peace should be recognized objectively and removed effectively. The one-year period since Annapolis has proved once again that negotiations can only succeed in an enabling environment of mutual trust and confidence and positive developments on the ground. That requires urgent and credible actions by all sides and various fronts, from security and political issues to capacity-building, humanitarian and socio-economic development aspects aimed at improving the daily lives of the Palestinian people.”
2008-12-18 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6049Resumption1 (2008) · source
“Fourth, the framework for peace has already been determined in the relevant United Nations resolutions, including resolutions 242 (1967), 338 (1973), 1397 (2002) and 1515 (2003), as well as the Madrid terms of reference, the Road Map, the Arab Peace Initiative and the understandings reached at Annapolis, which flow from that framework. There can be no deviation or modification in that basic mandate for the peace process. Fifth, to achieve a lasting settlement of the Arab- Israeli conflict, it is imperative to address its root cause - the Israeli occupation of the Arab territories. The solution therefore requires Israel's complete withdrawal from the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem, and all other occupied Arab territories, including the Syrian Golan.”
2008-12-18 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6049Resumption1 (2008) · source
“Second, the Quartet must also utilize its full potential in support of the peace process through a transparent and objective engagement, bringing the parties together and mobilizing the international community's moral, diplomatic, political and economic backing of the peace efforts. Third, in the context of the regional approach, the Security Council and the Quartet need to engage more seriously with the League of Arab States, which for its part has demonstrated a determined, constructive and dynamic approach for achieving comprehensive peace in the region, particularly through the Arab Peace Initiative. Likewise, the Organization of the Islamic Conference, which has an historic interest in the peaceful resolution of the question of Palestine, may be a key partner for peace efforts in the Middle East.”
2008-12-18 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6049Resumption1 (2008) · source
“But the international community must now ensure that its commitment for peace in the Middle East is consolidated and translated into concrete results, addressing all core issues during the course of the next year. Pakistan would like to underline a few points that, in our view, are essential for this process to succeed. First, the time has come for the Security Council to exercise its responsibility for peace and security in the Middle East, for which there could be no better way than to implement its own resolutions and decisions. Business as usual has become unsustainable. Greater political will, especially on the part of permanent members, is required to achieve real progress.”
2008-12-18 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6049Resumption1 (2008) · source
“The international community is rightly disappointed and concerned over these developments. As we approach the end of 2008, the goal of a peace treaty, instead of materializing, has only once again been postponed. Thus, we can understand the general feeling among Member States that resolution 1850 (2008) adopted by the Security Council the day before yesterday does not do full justice to the gravity of the situation and should have embodied a relatively stronger and clearer message from this Council. But more important than that is the fact that international pressure was such that the Council could not afford to keep quiet at this critical juncture. Despite its shortcomings, the resolution is important in the sense that it keeps alive the hope for a peaceful settlement, building upon previous agreements and obligations.”
2008-12-18 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6049Resumption1 (2008) · source
“The consequences of that failure will be disastrous - in the first instance for the oppressed populations of the occupied territories and, beyond that, for regional and international peace and security. A sincere and concerted effort is required to prevent the situation from deteriorating further and to advance a genuine process aimed at resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict comprehensively and peacefully. It was in that context that the peace process relaunched at the Annapolis conference in November last year had engendered great hope and legitimate expectations. It is, however, regrettable that there has been no appreciable progress in the negotiations. On the other hand, the situation on the ground in the occupied territories has become further aggravated, largely because of Israel's policies and actions.”
2008-12-18 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6049Resumption1 (2008) · source
“We welcome the convening of this open debate under your presidency, 08-6603] Sir, on the situation in the Middle East, which affords an opportunity to Member States to share their perspectives with the Security Council on this important matter. Comprehensive peace in the Middle East and a just, lasting and peaceful settlement of the core issue of Palestine is a long-held common objective of the international community, supported by the Council. Yet the achievement of that goal remains elusive, frustrating our collective efforts and desire for peace on the one hand, and perpetuating the cycle of injustice, violence and instability on the other.”
2008-12-18 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6049Resumption1 (2008) · source
“A partnership in which we are reluctant to share critical equipment and technologies will lack trust and amount to disarming those fighting against terrorists. This could not only result in undesired casualties, but would also prolong the war.”
2008-12-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6034Resumption1 (2008) · source
“So the need is to get closer. A consistent pattern of response based on divisions will not only expose our weaknesses, but encourage the evil. We need to stand united in the hour of crisis, taking that stance as an important element of our counter-terrorism strategy, to further cement the relationships aimed at fighting this menace. For the long-term resolution of international terrorism and security issues, we need to look into all root causes of international terrorism and security- related matters. These issues have been covered in the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, which was unanimously adopted by the General Assembly. We need to implement the Strategy in a balanced and comprehensive way. Last but not least, we have to sincerely and effectively address the capacity-building needs of the partner countries.”
2008-12-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6034Resumption1 (2008) · source
“Though these conflicts are unique in nature, they present similar challenges and opportunities. We should be encouraged by the dividends of the political solution of the Northern Ireland issue achieved through the Good Friday Agreement and follow in the same direction. I would like to underscore the need to strengthen democracies and to create an all-inclusive environment of support to fight the menace of terrorism. It helps to isolate those who promote their cause through force instead of debate and dialogue. It promotes the sense of social participation and mainstreams the fringe elements. The sinister terrorist masterminds take pains to identify and sabotage nascent friendships. If we succumb to their designs and actions, they repeat their actions. If you get closer after the destructive actions, they are discouraged.”
2008-12-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6034Resumption1 (2008) · source
“In the broader fight against terrorism, the pre-eminence of operational measures can never be challenged. However, to ensure the total defeat of terrorists, we need to formulate comprehensive strategies. We believe that a simplistic approach to resolving intricate problems will create more problems. The first and foremost need of the time is that we promote international harmony, in which this Council can play an exceedingly important role. We must reject efforts aimed at creating new divisions, clashes and schisms. The human thirst for justice, however misperceived it may be, can be better quenched through political means than through force. We must therefore promote political solutions to long-standing unresolved conflicts; here I would cite the situations in Kashmir and Palestine.”
2008-12-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6034Resumption1 (2008) · source
“The aforementioned measures, which are in process, constitute further proof of Pakistan's determination to take action and not to allow its territory to be used for terrorism. The Pakistan Government's ability and capacity to take strong measures requires the understanding and full support of its friends, the United Nations and its Security Council. In addition to our proposal of a joint commission and investigations, we have now proposed that India receive the highest possible level delegation from Pakistan to sort out these affairs and ensure that matters are further improved in the future. But now let me come to the real focus of this debate. I feel that our object is to improve and strengthen international cooperation and coordination in the fight against terrorism.”
2008-12-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6034Resumption1 (2008) · source
“Secondly, after the designation of Jamaat-ud- Dawa under resolution 1267 (1999), the Government, on receiving communication from the Security Council, shall proscribe Jamaat-ud-Dawa and take other consequential actions, as required, including the freezing of assets. A plan is being prepared to ensure effective Government supervision, as required by this body and others of the various welfare organizations. An intelligence-led operation, strongly supported by law enforcement agencies, is already under way to arrest the individuals alleged to be involved in the Mumbai attacks. No training camps for Lashkar-e- Tayyiba or any entity of this nature shall be allowed on the territory of Pakistan.”
2008-12-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6034Resumption1 (2008) · source
“In fact, the most powerful politician from that province happens to be Maulana Fazul-ur- Rehman, who also owes his obeisance to Deoband, So we can help each other, we can be with each other, and we can use each other's facilities - the last idea being perhaps the most important, and which has not yet even been considered. I would also like to give the Council a few glimpses of measures being undertaken today in Pakistan. First, the Government of Pakistan has already initiated investigations on its own pertaining to the allegations of the involvement of persons and entities in the Mumbai attacks.”
2008-12-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6034Resumption1 (2008) · source
“Some of those here may not be aware that in the Northwestern frontier province, where that matter has taken root in a very deep way, there is a very strong quarter of society led entirely by the mullahs. These mullahs owe their obeisance to the mullahs in Deoband, India. I do not say this as a criticism or to point fingers - I have a very good suggestion. What I would like to say is that if senior clerics from Deoband, who wield great influence in the North- West Frontier territories of Pakistan and in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas, would come to Pakistan, get together and, in their tremendous knowledge of religion, offer a fatwa in Pakistan against the suicide bombings and the killing of Muslims that are happening in Pakistan and even in India, I think it would have a very important effect in the North-West Frontier province.”
2008-12-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6034Resumption1 (2008) · source
“Later it was proved that an Indian Army colonel was involved. Similarly - not a point I would have raised today, but under the circumstances - with regard to Kashmir, Pakistan, despite its domestic situation, is exercising restraint in international forums, and that is how we would have liked to have seen the aftermath of the Mumbai incident as well. We are all aware that the Kashmir situation is the root cause of all the problems between India and Pakistan. Would it not be a good time to do away with the root cause by pledging to resolve it, not just with words but with deeds and actions, as we have done today in Pakistan, and get that problem away from us all? How should we proceed? I would say, let us recommend to each other to stop all negative campaigns against each other, that India must help resolve even the religious aspect.”
2008-12-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6034Resumption1 (2008) · source
“The world must act to strengthen Pakistan's economy and democracy, help us build civil society and provide us with the law enforcement and counter-terrorism capacities that will enable us to fight the terrorist activity effectively. He further goes on to say that India and Pakistan and the rest of the world must work together to track down the terrorists who caused mayhem in Mumbai, attacked New York, London, Madrid and also destroyed the Marriot Hotel in Islamabad in September. We did not wish to raise any issues, but by jumping to conclusions, I would request that my friends in India recall that when the Friendship Samjhauta Express - I do not want to raise this, but I am just giving this as an example - was burned down, with Muslim passengers killed on their way to Pakistan, fingers were pointed hastily at Pakistan.”
2008-12-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6034Resumption1 (2008) · source
“That is a very important statement, as it shows that all arms of the Pakistani Government are moving in coordination and cohesion towards punishment of those who seek, in any way, to destroy the peace of our neighbours and of our own country. So Pakistan has cast the proverbial first stone. I was a little surprised by the strong denouncement by my friends in India at the Security Council today, but then I view it under the domestic political considerations of the moment. But I do ask, is it warranted? Is there anything that we are not willing to do with you, within reason? The President of Pakistan clearly stated to India and the world that "the best response to the Mumbai carnage is to coordinate to counteracting the scourge of terrorism". I think this is a very important offer.”
2008-12-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6034Resumption1 (2008) · source
“Not only are the terrorists not linked to the Government of Pakistan in any way, we too are their targets and we too continue to be their victims. The President then goes on to say very empathetically, "But we caution against hasty judgments and inflammatory statements". The words of the President have today been converted from commitment to action. The New York Times has carried an article describing "Pakistan raids militants linked to Mumbai attacks", in which I specifically quote the Army Information Department of Pakistan as saying, "We have started intelligence-led operations against banned militant outfits and organizations today".”
2008-12-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6034Resumption1 (2008) · source
“They remind us of the common threat posed by terrorism and of our common birth and destiny. I condemn these incidents and condole with all concerned. The President of Pakistan asked me to convey to the Council the pain in India as he perceives it: "We can identify with India's pain. I am especially sympathetic. I feel this pain every time I look into the eyes of my children." Today, in the New York Times, the President of Pakistan has stated to the world his intent that Pakistan is committed to the pursuit, arrest, trial and punishment of anyone involved in those heinous attacks. Pakistan will take action against non-State actors found within our territory, treating them as criminals, terrorists and murderers.”
2008-12-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6034Resumption1 (2008) · source
“Today the United Nations has gathered to debate threats to international peace and security. It is fitting that the President of Croatia, His Excellency Mr. Stjepan Mesic', is presiding over this discussion. Croatia has suffered enormous trauma and has been devastated by the threats to its peace and security. I express my felicitations to His Excellency for not only presiding over this debate, but for also giving us, in his first address, the benefit of his experience in this matter. Today, as we discuss this important issue, we are troubled by two very tragic events that resulted in the indiscriminate killing of innocent civilians in Mumbai, India, and a few days later in Peshawar, Pakistan. These horrific devastations were thousands of miles apart, yet they have a discernible imprint of common purpose.”
2008-12-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6034Resumption1 (2008) · source
“Similarly, the MTCR is undermined by international cooperation in the development of anti-ballistic missiles, which involves cooperation in dual-use technologies, such as solid fuel propulsion systems, missile targeting and guidance systems, and other systems that can be used to develop offensive weaponry and missiles. I would like to conclude by reiterating the need to evolve multilaterally negotiated, non-discriminatory and universal regulations on armaments.”
2008-11-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6017Resumption1 (2008) · source
“If States are required to meet the standards set by those arrangements, they should be given the opportunity to participate in them and benefit by sharing the best practices and experiences of the founding members of those arrangements in the area of export controls. That would also enable States to keep abreast of technical advancements. Moreover, members of those exclusive arrangements have been creating discriminatory exceptions to their own rules, thus undermining the objective of international stability. Non criteria-based civil nuclear cooperation based on commercial consideration does nothing to promote international non-proliferation objectives.”
2008-11-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6017Resumption1 (2008) · source
“The best venue to pursue such consultations and negotiations is the General Assembly, in which all Member States are represented. Entrusting the responsibility for collective security to the Security Council and the tendency of the Security Council to legislate on behalf of Member States on matters of armaments control are bound to raise security concerns among the overwhelming majority of developing countries that are not represented in the Council. The existing export control arrangements, such as the Nuclear Suppliers Group and the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), are exclusive. The restricted nature of certain export control arrangements is an impediment to the global implementation of non-proliferation standards.”
2008-11-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6017Resumption1 (2008) · source
“Nevertheless, armament regulations alone cannot facilitate the objective of international peace and security unless pursued in parallel with efforts towards the peaceful settlement of disputes and to remove underlying security concerns of States. Regional tensions contribute to the arms race, not only endangering international peace and security, but also undermining efforts aimed at arms control and disarmament. Conflict resolution and the maintenance of strategic and conventional stability at the regional and global levels should therefore be at the core of efforts to strengthen international peace and security. The principle of equal security for all necessitates open consultations and dialogue among States without preconditions.”
2008-11-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6017Resumption1 (2008) · source
“The disturbing trend of escalation in the number and sophistication of conventional weapons has to be arrested, as it has a causal relationship with the continuing reliance on nuclear weapons. Cooperation in matters having strategic implications for a region should be pursued in such a manner as to ensure the right of each State to undiminished security, guaranteeing that no individual State or group of States may obtain advantage over others. Armament regulations should not only be aimed at transfer controls, but should also take into account existing asymmetries and military imbalances and stockpiles, as well as production and manufacturing.”
2008-11-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6017Resumption1 (2008) · source
“Commitment is needed to evolving a universal and non-discriminatory agreement for addressing concerns arising from the development, deployment and proliferation of missiles and anti-ballistic missile systems, which are inherently destabilizing. The need for strengthening the international legal regime to prevent the militarization of outer space must be recognized. In parallel with negotiations on nuclear disarmament, there is an urgent need for negotiations on the balanced reduction of armed forces and conventional armaments. As laid out in the Final Document of the first special session of the General Assembly devoted to disarmament, these negotiations should be conducted with a particular emphasis on militarily significant States.”
2008-11-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6017Resumption1 (2008) · source
“There must be a renewed commitment on the part all States to general and complete disarmament under effective international control. Transparency, verifiability and irreversibility should be the fundamental principles applied to all disarmament measures. Pending general and complete nuclear disarmament, there should be a universal, non-discriminatory and legally binding instruments on negative security assurances to non-nuclear-weapon States. There must be international agreement on universal and non-discriminatory criteria for international cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, including nuclear power generation. Policies of selectively granting or denying access to civilian nuclear technology in disregard of any generally applicable criteria detract from the credibility and legitimacy of the non-proliferation regime.”
2008-11-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6017Resumption1 (2008) · source
“The Pakistan delegation appreciates the holding of this debate. We hope that it will enhance understanding of various issues related to collective security and armament regulation. We have always stressed the imperative of evolving a new consensus on the whole range of disarmament, arms control and non-proliferation issues. This new consensus should be based on the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, with full recognition of the role of the United Nations, reflecting the security interests of all States and guided by the principle of equal security for all. The architecture of a global consensus on disarmament, arms control and non-proliferation should rest on a solid foundation comprising the following elements.”
2008-11-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.6017Resumption1 (2008) · source