YouSaid · the spoken record

Kaul

lines on the record
17
first
1995-09-07
most recent
1996-06-14
sittings or episodes
4
sources
un-security-council

Every line below is reproduced as it was said and linked to the record it came from. Nothing here is summarised or generated. Directory · Search · Corrections

  1. “The Council is giving the parties another, and probably a last, six-month chance, to actually demonstrate their commitment to an effective cease-fire and to national reconciliation, to be achieved with the assistance of the new Special Representative of the Secretary-General, UNMOT and the Commonwealth of Independent States peace- keepers. Germany is pleased that it was able to make a voluntary contribution of DM. 1 million to UNMOT in order to provide it with an air transport capacity. Finally, I would like to pay tribute to, and thank, the members of UNMOT for carrying out their mission under what are now very difficult circumstances.”

    1996-06-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3673 (1996) · source

  2. “Furthermore, it is imperative that the Joint Commission established to monitor cease-fire violations resume its work, after the walkout by the opposition, which was prompted by the kidnapping of the opposition Co- Chairrnan of the Commission on 24 February 1996. It is regrettable that there has been no news from the Government of Tajikistan on the results of its investigation of this incident. On the other hand, we have noted that the Government has obviously now given the written security guarantees asked for by the opposition, and we encourage the opposition to accept them in good faith. The parties to the conflict, both the Government of Tajikistan and the opposition, should now understand the stern warning message given to them in today's draft resolution.”

    1996-06-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3673 (1996) · source

  3. “In this context, what is needed first and foremost is an immediate cessation of hostilities by both sides. If both parties continue to play the military card and drag their feet on a continuation of the inter-Tajik talks, the result will be only pain and more misery for the people of Tajikistan. We call upon the parties to seek a peaceful, negotiated settlement; if this call is not heard and if the obligations undertaken by the parties are not respected, the Council will eventually be forced to draw its conclusions. If UNMOT is to effectively fulfil its mandate, all restrictions on its freedom of movement must be lifted, especially by the Government of Tajikistan. Verbal assurances that this will happen are not sufficient.”

    1996-06-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3673 (1996) · source

  4. “A Viable political compromise cannot consist only in power-sharing between the parties to the conflict, but must aim at establishing genuine democratic decision-making processes. Without a readiness by the Government to genuinely share power, however, a compromise cannot be reached. Germany supports the draft resolution, which provides for an extension of the mandate of the United Nations Mission of Observers in Tajikistan (UNMOT) for another six months. We attribute, however, great importance to the intention expressed in both the Secretary-General's report and the draft resolution to seriously review the future of the United Nations commitment in Tajikistan after these six months, if there is no meaningful progress in the peace process.”

    1996-06-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3673 (1996) · source

  5. “The Tehran Agreement of 17 September 1994, which constitutes the basis for a negotiated political settlement, has at best been partially implemented. The armed Islamist opposition seems to be about to take control of a large and strategically important part of Tajikistan. The region of Leninabad and other areas are gradually slipping from Government control. There are even some signs of disunity within the Kulyabi-dominated Government. We therefore see a concrete danger of an "Afghanization" of the conflict, with serious consequences for regional stability. Both parties bear a heavy load of responsibility for this development. We see, however, a major obstacle to a settlement in the Government's failure to open itself up to the participation of other regional and political groups in Tajikistan.”

    1996-06-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3673 (1996) · source

  6. “Let me begin by saying that Germany fully supports the statement made by the representative of Italy on behalf of the European Union and the States that have again associated themselves with another important statement of the European Union. Today's meeting of the Security Council provides an important opportunity to take stock of what has been achieved by the efforts of the parties to the conflict, and those of this Council, the Secretary-General and his Special Representatives, and other States and entities involved. The result is that there is still intensive fighting in the Tavildara area, the humanitarian situation is very serious, and the prospects for progress in the inter-Tajik talks are bleak.”

    1996-06-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3673 (1996) · source

  7. “Zaire, especially, is requested to enter into talks with the Commission about the possible deployment of United Nations officials monitoring the observation of the arms embargo. In his letter of 14 March 1996, the Secretary-General points out the need for appropriate resources for a continuation of the work of the Commission. We share his view. It would be short-sighted not to provide the necessary means for a task of this importance. Finally, let me express our hope that the Tunis Declaration of Heads of State of the Great Lakes region of 18 March 1996 will be implemented soon. A stable peace will be achieved only if the refugees can safely return to their home countries.”

    1996-04-23 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3656 (1996) · source

  8. “It is in the interest of the countries of the Great Lakes region themselves to ensure that the Commission is able to complete its task, and thus, to make sure that in the future there will not be a new flow of arms. This is the reason why we have voted for the resolution adopted today. Germany sees the work of the Commission as part of the endeavours of the international community to contribute to the stability of the region and therefore has supported its operations. Let me once again underline the importance we attach to the neighbouring countries intensification of their efforts to prevent any military activities by members of the former Rwandan regime. We call upon the States neighbouring Rwanda to fully cooperate with the Commission in its effort to contribute to a better implementation of the arms embargo.”

    1996-04-23 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3656 (1996) · source

  9. “We are very grateful to the International Commission of Inquiry for the intensive and thorough work it has carried out and for the report delivered to the Council. In view of the priority aim of achieving peace and stability in the Great Lakes region, it is of major importance for the whole international community to stop the uncontrolled flow of arms to the area. Therefore, we have a common interest in enabling the Commission of Inquiry to fulfil its obligations. For this reason, we strongly support the suggestion that the countries mentioned in the report should do their utmost to contribute to investigating the sources of their nationals who may be involved in purchasing and supplying arms to the region.”

    1996-04-23 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3656 (1996) · source

  10. “On 9 November, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia charged three officers of the Yugoslav National Army from a Belgrade-based brigade with the mass killing of non-Serb men, who, after the month-long siege and eventual conquest of Vukovar four years ago, were forcibly removed from the Vukovar hospital. This is, in our View, a painful but appropriate reminder of the responsibility that the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia continues to bear for the unresolved situation in Eastern Slavonia. Consequently, the leadership in Belgrade must help actively to settle this question. We will follow closely which side demonstrates - not only through its words, but also through its deeds and behaviour - its readiness to use the chance for a peaceful settlement afforded by the Basic Agreement.”

    1995-11-22 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3596 (1995) · source

  11. “The German delegation is ready to contribute actively to our deliberations and decisions. Ultimately, however, it is only the Government of Croatia and the local Serb party that can breathe life into the Basic Agreement and make it a success. It is therefore right that the draft resolution before the Council stresses the need for them to cooperate fully on the basis of the Agreement and to refrain from any measures that might hinder its implementation. This also holds true for the Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.”

    1995-11-22 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3596 (1995) · source

  12. “This process can lead and, we hope, will lead to the peaceful coexistence of Serbs and Croats in the Republic of Croatia. It is obvious that many difficulties lie ahead and that much work needs to be done to achieve this aim, to which we all aspire. There must be no misunderstanding: the Basic Agreement will enter into force only upon the Council's adoption of a resolution establishing a Transitional Administration and authorizing an international force to be deployed during the transitional period. Thus, the Basic Agreement confers upon the Security Council important responsibilities. In the coming days and weeks, Council members will have to work intensively on the details and modalities of, in particular, the envisaged international force and Transitional Administration. These are complex issues.”

    1995-11-22 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3596 (1995) · source

  13. “On the other, there must be full protection of and guarantees for the rights of the local Serb population. Let me also take this opportunity to express our deep appreciation to all those who have helped to bring about this Agreement, in particular Mr. Stoltenberg, the United Nations mediator, and Ambassador Galbraith of the United States of America. We are gratified to hear that Ambassador Ahrens, the Chairman of the Working Group on Minorities of the International Conference on the Former Yugoslavia, was also able to contribute to the difficult negotiations. We hope that his advice, based on his experience and deep involvement, will also help us to tackle the difficult issues raised by this agreement. Let me be clear: the Basic Agreement marks, not the end but, on the contrary, just the beginning of a process.”

    1995-11-22 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3596 (1995) · source

  14. “Our purpose today is to welcome and thus to strengthen and consolidate the Basic Agreement on Eastern Slavonia which was signed on 12 November in Erdut between the Croatian Government and the local Serb representatives. This Agreement and the understanding on it reached by President Tudjman and President Milosevic in Dayton represent a major step forward. The Basic Agreement offers the best chance for a peaceful solution of the conflict in Croatia and the best chance to avoid further war that we have had in a long time. Germany wishes to pay tribute to the moderation and wisdom of the leaders involved on all sides, which made this Agreement possible. It is, in our view, based on two important principles. On the one side, the sovereignty of Croatia with regard to Eastern Slavonia is acknowledged.”

    1995-11-22 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3596 (1995) · source

  15. “Consequently, we expect that the authorities of Zaire and of the other countries in the region will closely cooperate with and fully support the work of the members of the Commission. We hope that the establishment of this Commission will be an important step towards stabilizing the situation in the Great Lakes region. Others will have to follow. In this respect, we welcome in particular the appointment of a Special Envoy of the Secretary-General to work for the preparation and convening of a regional conference. Such a conference will help the countries of the subregion achieve long-lasting stability. Germany is willing to assist them in their efforts.”

    1995-09-07 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3574 (1995) · source

  16. “My delegation voted in favour of resolution 1013 (1995), which we have just adopted, because we think that an International Commission of Inquiry to investigate allegations of arms flows to former Rwandan government forces in the Great Lakes region can make a valuable contribution to achieving regional stability. First, it will help curb the illegal flow of arms in the subregion. Secondly, it will bring stability to the countries concerned by establishing clarity and the truth with regard to existing allegations. Thirdly, it will help foster cooperation between the countries of the region. This resolution is based on recommendations made by the Secretary-General, for which we are grateful. The Government of Zaire, in particular, has called for the establishment of such a Commission.”

    1995-09-07 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3574 (1995) · source

  17. “I should like first to extend to you, Sir, my delegation's congratulations on your assumption of the presidency of the Council for the month of September. My delegation is ready to work closely with you during your period in office. I would also like to express the thanks and appreciation of my delegation to Ambassador Wisnumurti for his convincing leadership and very effective conduct of business during the month of August. Germany has taken an active role in all efforts aimed at furthering peace and security in and around Rwanda and the Great Lakes region. In line with our active and intensive commitment since the outbreak of the crisis in Rwanda last year, Foreign Minister Kinkel travelled to the subregion in July. But the problems in the subregion are by no means resolved, and, unfortunately, instability persists.”

    1995-09-07 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3574 (1995) · source