YouSaid · the spoken record

Osvald

lines on the record

151

first

1992-07-15

most recent

1997-07-31

sittings or episodes

25

sources

un-security-council

Every line below is reproduced as it was said and linked to the record it came from. Nothing here is summarised or generated. Directory · Search · Corrections

1. “Later in the debate, the Netherlands will speak on behalf of the European Union. We, of course, stand fully behind that statement. While the people of Afghanistan has now endured 18 years of war, there are no indications that the warring parties will heed repeated international appeals for peace and a negotiated settlement. On the contrary, there are reports that the fighting could intensify when spring arrives. Innocent men, women and children will continue to suffer the intolerable agonies of war. A negotiated settlement, beginning with an immediate ceasefire and the formation of a broad-based transitional government, and ultimately followed by democratic elections, is the only acceptable road to peace in Afghanistan.”

   1997-04-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3765 (1997) · source

2. “It is important that the large number of Liberian refugees be given the opportunity to cast their votes. The prompt voluntary repatriation of refugees is therefore essential. The ECOWAS Monitoring Group (ECOMOG) has played an important role in the Liberian peace process and will continue to do so. ECOMOG will also play an important role in the electoral process in ensuring the security and protection of international personnel. In this context too, we welcome the cooperation between ECOMOG and UN OMIL. Sweden believes that a prolongation of the mandate of UNOMIL and an extension of its tasks in line with the recommendations of the Secretary-General will promote the process of peace and democracy in Liberia. We will therefore vote in favour of the draft resolution now before us.”

   1997-03-27 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3757 (1997) · source

3. “I would first like to say that we fully share the views expressed by the Netherlands on behalf of the European Union a few minutes ago on the situation in Liberia. Sweden welcomes the progress made in the peace process in Liberia. It is especially encouraging that the security situation in the country has improved and that there have been significant achievements in the demobilization process. The forthcoming elections will be an important step towards democracy in Liberia. In this context, Sweden welcomes the recommendations on a basic framework for the elections, as endorsed by the Chairman of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). The timetable for the elections is, however, extremely tight. It is imperative that the parties do their utmost to facilitate its implementation.”

   1997-03-27 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3757 (1997) · source

4. “Peace and stability in the region are an urgent necessity not only to the parties and the region but to the whole international community. We "urge the Israeli Government to reconsider its decision on the settlements in Jabal Abu Ghneim/Herr Homa and to reverse its settlement policy. This will serve the peace process, the Israeli and the Palestinian peoples, and international security.”

   1997-03-05 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3745 (1997) · source

5. “The most recent decision concerns Jabal Abu Ghneim/Hat Homa located on the occupied West Bank in the Jerusalem area. My Government considers that the construction of such settlements is a grave obstacle to peace, incompatible with the Declaration of Principles and in contravention of international law, notably the Fourth Geneva Convention. The framework laid down in the Declaration of Principles between the Government of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) should be the blueprint for an irreversible process. The peace efforts of the Government of Israel and the Palestinians must be brought to fruition. All parties have a formidable responsibility to see to it that this endeavour becomes reality.”

   1997-03-05 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3745 (1997) · source

6. “The Hebron Protocol of 17 January 1997, concerning Israeli redeployment in and from Hebron and aspects on the further implementation of the Interim Agreement, constitutes an important step towards strengthening confidence between the parties. The parties should continue to base their efforts on what has been achieved so far and refrain from measures that can threaten the peace process. In particular this applies to measures that could prejudge the outcome of the final status negotiations, including steps that would change the status of the occupied territories. Accordingly, the Government of Israel should reverse its settlement policy. Sweden has long been deeply concerned about Israeli Government decisions and plans concerning settlements on occupied territory.”

   1997-03-05 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3745 (1997) · source

7. “Sweden fully associates itself with the statement that will be made later in the debate by the representative of the. Netherlands on behalf of the European Union. Sweden is committed to the peace process, both politically and economically. We support the right of the Palestinians to self-detennination, including their right to a State of their own. This right can be fully realized only through negotiations and only through a political process can lasting security in the Middle East be achieved. The foundations for peace are laid down in Security Council resolutions 242 (1967), 338 (1973) and 425 (1978). The direction and timetable of the Israeli and Palestinian peace process was agreed to in the Declaration of Principles of 1993 and the Interim Agreement of 1995.”

   1997-03-05 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3745 (1997) · source

8. “We were deeply moved by the news of the passing away of Deng Xiaoping, Paramount Leader of China. He was the architect behind a process of change in China of historic proportions. He will be remembered by future generations, not least for stimulating economic development and for raising the standard of living and increasing the prosperity of the Chinese people, as well as for his role in the opening up of China to the international community. On behalf of the Swedish Government, I wish to convey to the Government and the people of China, and to the family of Deng Xiaoping, our sincere condolences on the great loss that they have suffered.”

   1997-02-27 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3742 (1997) · source

9. “The final success of the Guatemalan peace process will, of course, be measured through the implementation of the peace agreements in all their aspects - military and civilian. The decision before us today would enhance the contribution of the United Nations to assisting the parties in this endeavour.”

   1997-01-10 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3730 (1997) · source

10. “In addition to ceasefire and military provisions, the package of peace accords includes agreements on constitutional, social and economic issues, human rights and the identity and rights of indigenous peoples. It is appropriate that verification is entrusted to a multidimensional United Nations operation. The contributions of various parts of the United Nations system, in particular the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), will be of major importance in supporting implementation of the peace agreements. Coordination between all international organizations and agencies supporting the peace process is important. Tribute should in particular be paid today to the Guatemalan parties themselves; they have carried the peace process forward and will carry responsibility for its success.”

    1997-01-10 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3730 (1997) · source

11. “As proposed by the Secretary-General, this task should be carried out by the attachment to MINUGUA of a group of military observers and some medical personnel. It is in keeping with United Nations practice that this military component should be authorized under a Security Council mandate. This is a case in which the Security Council is called upon to exercise its primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security. It is important that the draft resolution be adopted by the Council. It enjoys Sweden's full support. The Guatemalan peace Agreement is multidimensional in character. It is a good example of how the practical application of a broader concept of security can create a basis for peaceful development.”

    1997-01-10 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3730 (1997) · source

12. “Sweden participates in the United Nations Mission for the Verification of Human Rights and of Compliance with the Commitments of the Comprehensive Agreement on Human Rights in Guatemala (MINUGUA). Sweden is also a substantial contributor to MINUGUA's fund for institution-building. The United Nations has played a crucial role in laying a foundation for peace in Guatemala through the efforts of MINUGUA, the Guatemala Unit of the Secretariat and, of course, the United Nations Moderator, Mr. Jean Arnault. The Group of Friends of Guatemala has also made important contributions in support of the peace process. The agreement on the definitive ceasefire expressly assigns the role of verifying the military aspects of the peace settlement to the United Nations.”

    1997-01-10 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3730 (1997) · source

13. “The signing of the peace Agreement in Guatemala on 29 December 1996 put an end to 36 years of bitter conflict. Guatemala will now finally have the opportunity to devote its energies to peaceful, long-term development, together with the rest of the Central American region. Since the 19705, Sweden has worked in support of democracy and peace in Central America and has played an active part in developments leading to the historic peace Agreement in Guatemala. The Swedish Government was honoured to host the signing of the agreement on constitutional reforms and the electoral regime in Stockholm last December. Sweden has pledged substantial contributions in support of the important tasks of demobilization and the reintegration into society of former combatants.”

    1997-01-10 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3730 (1997) · source

14. “The Swedish Government also takes a positive attitude towards examining the possibility of sending Swedish military experts to start up demobilizing centres or, alternatively, to assist in demobilizing operations. What we now hope for, and indeed expect, is the full commitment of the parties to the process towards real and lasting peace and security in Angola. Sweden, for its part, is ready to make its contribution towards this goal.”

    1995-02-08 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3499Resumption1 (1995) · source

15. “The Government has decided to provide 20 military observers to UNAVEM. III. The Swedish Government intends to continue to support the peace process and the rebuilding of the country in ways that are found most suitable. Humanitarian relief programmes will continue, but assistance will increasingly be directed towards basic needs such as the strengthening of transport facilities, logistics and so on. The number of mines dispersed is a serious problem, causing continuous suffering and death, as well as preventing the return of normal life. A decision has therefore been taken in cooperation with the Angolan Government and the World Food Programme to begin mine-clearance operations to be carried out by Swedish military personnel.”

    1995-02-08 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3499Resumption1 (1995) · source

16. “Blondin Beye, for his vigorous efforts for the Lusaka process and its implementation, as well as for his help in improving the political atmosphere in Angola. The Lusaka Protocol assigns a crucial role to the United Nations. We therefore welcome the Secretary- General's assessment that the respect for the cease-fire shown by the Government of Angola and UNITA and their commitment to ensuring the safety and security of personnel have made it possible for him to recommend that the third United Nations Angola Verification Mission (UNAVEM. III) now take over from UNAVEM. II. It is also encouraging to learn that many Member States, not least neighbouring countries, have indicated a readiness to contribute a significant number of units and observers to the new operation. Sweden participated with military and police observers in UNAVEM. II.”

    1995-02-08 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3499Resumption1 (1995) · source

17. “The events of 1992, when UNITA resorted to arms after defeat in the general elections, must not be allowed to happen again. A successful peace process requires strong determination and mutual trust between the parties. If this is not the case, no United Nations mission, no matter how well planned and equipped, can succeed in its task. It is a good sign that the military commanders of both sides have met, but it seems not to be enough. Direct talks between President dos Santos and the UNITA leader, Jonas Savimbi, are necessary for any real process towards national reconciliation. Sweden therefore calls on both parties to do their utmost to ensure that the peace process moves forward. In this connection, we would like to express our thanks and admiration to the Special Representative of the Secretary-General, Mr.”

    1995-02-08 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3499Resumption1 (1995) · source

18. “Since the time of Angola's independence, Sweden has been actively engaged in development cooperation and other forms of support for development and peace in Angola. The people of Angola have for too long already suffered the plight of a devastating civil war. We therefore greeted the signing of the first peace accord, as well as that of the Lusaka Protocol of November last year, with special relief and satisfaction. That Protocol and the subsequent cease-fire provide the necessary basis for a process leading to a lasting peace. However, the situation remains uncertain. As has been proved on many occasions, formal undertakings by parties involved in a conflict are not necessarily enough. Agreements must be respected by all concerned and they must be implemented.”

    1995-02-08 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3499Resumption1 (1995) · source

19. “Mr. President, let me first of all say that my delegation finds it particularly fitting that you, as Foreign Minister of Botswana, should be presiding over this important meeting. We are sure that under the presidency of Botswana this month the Council will be in good hands. The participation today of an Organization of African Unity (OAU) ministerial delegation, headed by the Foreign Minister of Malawi, is also a telling sign of the importance of the occasion and of the support for and commitment of the OAU and its member States to the successful conclusion of what we hope will be the final step towards a lasting peace in Angola. I was very pleased to see the Foreign Minister of Angola among us, and my delegation appreciated his interesting statement.”

    1995-02-08 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3499Resumption1 (1995) · source

20. “One area for future consideration would be to make efforts, when feasible, to engage in consultations those countries that realistically may be in a position to contribute troops to a new peace-keeping operation before a decision is taken by the Security Council to launch the new operation in question. There are of course also other ideas that could be further elaborated. Let me finish by assuring you, Madam President, that the Nordic troop-contributing countries are prepared to do their utmost to cooperate with the Security Council and the Secretary-General to reach our common goal of making United Nations peace-keeping operations as effective and efficient as possible in fulfilling the mandates given to them by the Security Council.”

    1994-11-04 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3449 (1994) · source

21. “In our view, the consultations with the troop contributors should be structured, focused on areas of particular concern and take place on a regular basis, as well as when extensions and/or modifications of existing mandates are being considered. The modalities and practical arrangements for the consultations as they are spelled out in the presidential statement will provide a good framework for achieving these objectives. We are prepared to play our part in making the consultations worthwhile and useful for all concerned. We note with satisfaction that the Security Council will keep the new arrangements under review and that it stands ready to consider further measures to enhance the arrangements in the light of experience.”

    1994-11-04 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3449 (1994) · source

22. “For a long time we have been stressing that there is an urgent need for improved procedures for consultations between troop contributors, members of the Security Council and the Secretary-General. This is reflected, inter alia, in General Assembly resolution 48/43 of 10 December 1993, which was a Nordic initiative and was adopted by consensus. It was further stressed in a letter of 6 October 1994 from the Nordic ambassadors to the President of the Security Council. We firmly believe that an enhanced dialogue with the Security Council and increased transparency in these matters will be of crucial importance in maintaining the broad political support for United Nations peace-keeping operations that has been the tradition in our countries. Such a dialogue would also, in our opinion, improve the efficiency of the operations.”

    1994-11-04 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3449 (1994) · source

23. “Against this background, we have taken a keen interest in the discussion in the Security Council on the timely initiative of Argentina 14 and New Zealand relating to a strengthening of the arrangements for consultations between troop-contributing countries, members of the Security Council and the Secretary-General. We welcome and strongly support the important presidential statement that you, Madam President, made today on behalf of the Security Council on this issue. Thanks to the efforts of Argentina and New Zealand and the helpful and constructive way their proposal has been handled in the Council, all troop-contributing countries can today look forward to a new chapter in the relations between them and the Security Council.”

    1994-11-04 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3449 (1994) · source

24. “I wish first of all to congratulate you, Madam President, on your assumption of the presidency of the Council for the month of November. We are certain that the Council is in good hands. I have the honour to speak on behalf of the four Nordic troop-contributing countries: Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. The Nordic countries have always been strong supporters of United Nations peace-keeping operations. Over the years, we have contributed a considerable number of troops to these operations. At present, almost 5,600 men and women from our countries are participating in ongoing United Nations peace-keeping operations.”

    1994-11-04 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3449 (1994) · source

25. “Let there be no misunderstanding about the strong intent of the international community to maintain the sanctions imposed until the conditions for their removal have been met. Maintaining these sanctions subjects neighbouring countries to serious economic hardship. Efforts to alleviate this hardship should be further improved. Furthermore, in our view, a lifting of the arms embargo for Bosnia and Herzegovina would not contribute to a solution of the conflict. Let me conclude by expressing my Government's hope for common and decisive action for further pressure on the parties to put an end to this shameful war.”

    1994-04-21 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3367 (1994) · source

26. “The process would benefit from the continuous presence of representatives from the United Nations, the European Union, the United States, the Russian Federation and others, including large troop contributors, acting jointly and with determination for common goals. As for the immediate situation on the ground, we see merit in drawing on experience from Sarajevo two months ago. This example could serve as a point of departure for all safe areas as defined in Security Council resolutions 824 (1993) and 836 (1993). If the Serbian side does not immediately abide by its commitments, stop the shelling and withdraw from the Gorazde area, the United Nations must consider unilateral action and deploy UNPROFOR troops in Gorazde too. Such deployment must be coupled with a determination to use air power.”

    1994-04-21 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3367 (1994) · source

27. “United and determined political pressure on the parties, exerted by the international community, is a prerequisite for further action. The major Powers have a special responsibility in this respect. The Bosnian Serbs must be brought back to the peace negotiations to settle their relations within the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The international community's unanimous support for strong action in order to put an end to the senseless killing once and for all is crucial. Once this is achieved, the same determination and common action should be put to work in rebuilding and rehabilitating former Yugoslavia and in repatriating refugees. Sweden welcomes the proposal for a high-level conference on Bosnia.”

    1994-04-21 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3367 (1994) · source

28. “When it comes to a widened use of air power, this must be considered in a strategic and political context, with clear goals set and with sufficient resources on the ground - as well as with full consideration for the safety of United Nations and other international staff. The use of air power cannot settle the conflict. It is the international community's last resort against heinous attacks on defenceless civilians. It would not signify that the United Nations has taken sides. Judicious use of air power should be seen as the response of the international community to those who mercilessly flout humanitarian law. The Council bears the ultimate responsibility in the international endeavours to bring peace to the area.”

    1994-04-21 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3367 (1994) · source

29. “Without our political and financial support, all operations are crippled from the beginning. To encourage such support, consultations with troop-contributing countries should be held regularly. For its part, Sweden is to send an additional mechanized infantry company to Bosnia in a few weeks. Insufficient support will not only unnecessarily jeopardize the safety and success of this operation, but will also put at risk the public perception of and future possibilities for United Nations action. Sweden supports a more resolute and determined attitude on the part of UNPROFOR and the North Atlantic 28 Treaty Organization (NATO). UNPROFOR troops must be given the protection they need.”

    1994-04-21 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3367 (1994) · source

30. “I wish to congratulate you, Sir, on your assumption of the presidency of the Council for this month. We know that, under your wise guidance, the Council is in good hands. I am speaking as the representative of a concerned European country contributing a sizeable contingent to the United Nations Protection Force (UNPROFOR), a country participating actively in the humanitarian efforts to alleviate the suffering of the Bosnian people and a country giving refuge to almost 100,000 people from former Yugoslavia. UNPROFOR is clearly in need of more troops on the ground in Bosnia. Sweden therefore welcomes the draft resolution on this subject under discussion in the Council. The necessary resources and troops must be put at the disposal of the Organization. The responsibility for this lies with the Member States.”

    1994-04-21 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3367 (1994) · source

31. “No lasting peace can be reached if potential conflicts in the area are allowed to continue and if, as a consequence, hostilities spread to other parts of the region. The Members of the United Nations have conferred on the Security Council the primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security. The Council, in its decisions, acts on behalf of the Member States. Thus, the Council carries the ultimate responsibility for the implementation of its decisions regarding the conflict in the former Yugoslavia. It is our conviction that the Council will act with responsibility in its handling of the present situation. If it does so, the common commitment to peace in the area - and to international peace and security - will be strongly manifested.6”

    1994-02-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3336Resumption1 (1994) · source

32. “It is just and logical that today we should focus on stopping terror against Sarajevo and on giving that city real United Nations protection. But let us keep other aspects of the situation in former Yugoslavia in mind, and let the momentum achieved also contribute to the solution of these problems. The sanctions regime against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) has so far been the most effective means deployed by the international community. The sanctions must be upheld, and must not be lifted before we are assured that a peace agreement on Bosnia is really being implemented. A full normalization of relations with Serbia and Montenegro cannot begin until we have peace in Krajina anda fair solution concerning Kosovo.”

    1994-02-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3336Resumption1 (1994) · source

33. “The Security Council resolutions constitute a framework for a more determined United Nations stance in Bosnia and Herzegovina, but the safety of United Nations personnel must not be disregarded. The Nordic contingent should be fully deployed without delay. The work and safety of UNPROFOR and the humanitarian agencies must be respected. Threats against aid workers cannot be accepted. By now, it should be obvious to the parties that a withdrawal of UNPROFOR and relief personnel would harm only the parties' own people. In this context, Sweden urges the parties to give their5 consent to the opening of Tuzla airport. We also urge them to facilitate all humanitarian deliveries, including the airlifts to Sarajevo; Sweden is participating in such activities.”

    1994-02-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3336Resumption1 (1994) · source

34. “It isa process in which we all have to contribute troops or other resources. It is a process that is long overdue. UNPROFOR is now quickly adapting to the new situation. The role of the United Nations forces in any demilitarization of Sarajevo must not be jeopardized. Therefore, Member States must be ready to respond to the needs expressed by the Secretary-General and the Force Commander. The troops and equipment necessary for a credible performance by United Nations troops in Sarajevo, and in Bosnia and Herzegovina as a whole, should be provided without delay. As an important troop contributor, Sweden is looking forward to close consultations on this matter. It is Sweden's opinion that the authority of UNPROFOR must be upheld and respected, and that the United Nations troops should act more firmly.”

    1994-02-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3336Resumption1 (1994) · source

35. “The international community must be ready to assist the parties further in turning away from the horrors of war and in choosing the road to peace. Sweden commends the tireless efforts by Lord Owen and Mr. Stoltenberg to this effect. We also welcome the more active involvement by the United States in the peace process and also the constructive contributions from Russia. Political pressure must be kept up on all parties.4 On the road to peace, the cease-fire and the withdrawal of all heavy weaponry from Sarajevo would constitute a first step, and we urge the parties to abide by this process. It is our hope that this first step will be followed by similar arrangements throughout Bosnia and Herzegovina, to be built upon in a negotiating process towards reconciliation, rehabilitation and rebuilding.”

    1994-02-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3336Resumption1 (1994) · source

36. “We fully support the Secretary-General's request to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to prepare for the possible use of air power to bring about the implementation of resolution 836 (1993), and we welcome the recent decision by the North Atlantic Council to start preparing for such action if United Nations demands are not met by 20 February. It is of special importance that the threat to use air power be seen as part of an essential political process aimed at a negotiated solution, and that such power be used only in full coordination with the UNPROFOR forces on the ground. The conflict can never be settled from the air: it has to be settled essentially by political means, at the negotiating table. We do not wish to see an escalation of violence; we do not wish to see air strikes: they should be used only as a last resort.”

    1994-02-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3336Resumption1 (1994) · source

37. “Mr. President, allow me to express my own, and my delegation's, great satisfaction at seeing you preside over the Council's deliberations this month. We were all shocked and outraged at the massacre in Sarajevo on Saturday, 5 February. The heinous terror against civilians must not be allowed to continue.3 It has become necessary to strengthen further the role of the United Nations in preventing further carnage in and around Sarajevo and to promote a settlement of the conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Such a settlement will require compromise from all parties. The illusion of temporary military advances will serve only to prolong the war and delay the peace. Security Council resolution 836 (1993) mandates the United Nations Protection Force (UNPROFOR) to protect the "safe areas" Sarajevo is such an area.”

    1994-02-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3336Resumption1 (1994) · source

38. “The rest of the world cannot stand by and watch the humanitarian disaster which is now taking place in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Increased contributions are imperative. The international community has a duty, furthermore, to ensure that those responsible for crimes such as indiscriminate shelling of surrounded towns and cities, mass rape and "ethnic cleansing" should be prosecuted as soon as possible by the international war crimes tribunal for the former Yugoslavia established by the Security Council.”

    1993-04-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3201 (1993) · source

39. “In that light, continued Serb defiance, such as that already voiced by Mr. Karadzic and Mr. Mladic, may well make international selective military action against Serbian military targets unavoidable. If and when a peace agreement for Bosnia and Herzegovina is signed by all the parties concerned, the Members of the United Nations must accept the responsibility of contributing to an international peace-keeping force under United Nations command. This force will be required to monitor compliance with the agreement, thus establishing a basis for a lasting peace in the region. Sweden is prepared to contribute to such a force. International relief measures must be strengthened, in an effort to alleviate the needs and suffering of the civilian population.”

    1993-04-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3201 (1993) · source

40. “'These efforts will be further strengthened in pursuance of Security Council resolution 820 (1993). Sweden for its part does not believe that the arms embargo against Bosnia and Herzegovina should be lifted. We strongly doubt that more weapons could contribute to peace in that war-torn country. It is much more likely to lead to a further escalation of violence and destruction. It is true that in the present circumstances there are arguments for not denying the defenders the weapons they need for their self-defence. However, in the view of my Government, the response of the international community should be to take on the responsibility of ensuring compliance with the resolutions of the Security Council. This, in our view, would be the better means of ending further fighting and further human suffering.”

    1993-04-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3201 (1993) · source

41. “In order to induce the Serbs to sign the remaining parts of the peace agreement, Sweden supports the further strengthening of sanctions decided upon by the Council and will work for their full implementation in the context of the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe (CSCE). The support which is brought to the efforts of the International Conference on the former Yugoslavia by the CSCE follow three parallel lines of action. Together, they comprise the strategy of supportive action by the CSCE: first, crisis containment and prevention of its spillover to new areas; secondly, efforts to counteract crimes of war and violations of human rights; and, thirdly, support of the implementation and coordination of the United Nations sanctions regime.”

    1993-04-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3201 (1993) · source

42. “Today it is of the utmost importance that the Bosnian Serbs follow the 'example set by the Bosnian Government and the Bosnian Croats and sign the peace agreement immediately. By failing to Sign the peace agreement and by continuing, at the same time, their shelling against civilians and their "ethnic cleansing", for example in Sarajevo and Srebrenica, Serbs bear a tremendous responsibility for the human suffering that is now taking place. The regime in Belgrade as well as the Bosnian Serbs must realize this. Only Serb acceptance of the peace plan and the ending of military aggression will create conditions for avoiding total isolation of Serbia and the eventual lifting of sanctions.”

    1993-04-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3201 (1993) · source

43. “Sweden supports the Vance-Owen plan, which has been negotiated within the framework of the International Conference on the Former Yugoslavia. Allow me, in this context, to pay a particular tribute to Cyrus Vance and Lord Owen, and all their collaborators, for their tireless efforts. Lasting peace in the reqion must be based on the principles laid down in the peace plan, and on the concept of Bosnia and Herzegovina as an independent State. Even if no plan can be ideal under present circumstances, the Vance-Owen proposal takes into account the concerns of the parties to a sufficient degree. If the war is allowed to continue, the peace plan as now envisaged could rapidly lose its relevance. The fighting flaring up regularly between Bosnian Croat and Muslim forces, including during the last few days around Vitez, is of considerable concern.”

    1993-04-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3201 (1993) · source

44. “It is only to be hoped that the decisions taken over the weekend, prompted by alarming events in and around Srebrenica, signal a firmer intention to uphold the authority of the Council and to act decisively in a case as exceedingly grave as that which now confronts us in Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is true that the Security Council has taken a number of measures in the 33 resolutions on the conflict in the former Yugoslavia that it has adopted up to now. As far as Bosnia and Herzegovina is concerned, I should particularly like to stress the decisions that enabled a major humanitarian relief operation to be carried out by keeping the airport at Sarajevo open and by protecting the distribution of relief supplies throughout the country. This operation is a significant United Nations achievement under extremely difficult conditions.”

    1993-04-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3201 (1993) · source

45. “Not only are communities where Serbs, Croats and Muslims used to live side by side now falling apart; the credibility of our common ideals is also fast unravelling as the international community has seemed unable to take decisive political decisions to stop the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina from reaching even more unimaginable levels of savagery and destruction. We are obviously not unaware of some of the problems that in past weeks have prevented the Security Council from taking stronger action in relation to Serbian recalcitrance about accepting current peace efforts.”

    1993-04-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3201 (1993) · source

46. “Sweden appreciates this opportunity to participate in the Security Council's debate on the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina. I think we are all painfully aware of the extremely grave and steadily worsening humanitarian situation on the ground, in particular in places such as Sarajevo and Srebrenica, where the shelling and destruction carried out by the Serbian forces is taking an appalling toll of the civilian population. The senseless killing and maiming of defenceless civilians in besieged cities, added to the atrocities that have been carried out for more than a year now, are totally unacceptable.”

    1993-04-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3201 (1993) · source

47. “Le me assure members that the Swedish Government will give its full support to the forthcoming decision of the Security Council and to the Secretary-General in this matter. We also pledge our readiness to contribute to them in whatever way we can.”

    1992-07-15 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3095 (1992) · source

48. “; Almost three years ago the General Assembly unanimously adopted the Declaration on Apartheid and Its Destructive Consequences in Southern Africa. By this Declaration, the world community for the first time spoke with one voice to condemn the abhorrent system of apartheid. Today, the time has come for the United Nations to act decisively. It should assist the parties in their efforts to put an end to the devastating violence, which has claimed more than 1,800 lives this year alone. The reform process within the framework of CODESA must, as I said, be put back on track. Here too the United Nations could play an important role by helping to create conditions that would allow those involved in the process to overcome their mistrust and lack of confidence. These elements are refiected in the draft resolution now before the Council.”

    1992-07-15 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3095 (1992) · source

49. “We must, however, recognize that violence constitutes a grave threat to the continuation of the reform process and to the possibilities of finding a peaceful and lasting solution to the South African challenge. The Swedish Government has repeatedly condemned the continued violence in South Africa. It has declared that the South African Government must consider the situation carefully and shoulder its responsibility to protect the lives and property of all citizens. Other parties involved must also take their full responsibility and forcefully combat violence in accordance with the Peace Accord signed last year. At this juncture we must ask ourselves what role the international community, and in particular the United Nations, could play in the efforts to bring about democracy in South Africa.”

    1992-07-15 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3095 (1992) · source

50. “For the first time the majority of the South African population has taken part in negotiations on the country's constitution. In recognition of the positive trends and successive political agreements in South Africa, the Swedish Government has declared that it is prepared to let these developments be reflected in its relations and cooperation with South Africa. The Swedish Government has also declared that it will consider the lifting of sanctions against South Africa in accordance with the actual progress being achieved within South Africa. There is no alternative to the reform process. It must continue and be brought to a successful conclusion to make possible a peaceful and prosperous future for all South Africans. This process deserves the full support and encouragement of the international community.”

    1992-07-15 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3095 (1992) · source