Abdelhaq Sari
Bourassa, Quebec · Liberal · Canada
“Mr. Speaker, people are coming out of the woodwork every day claiming to be AI experts. Some have contacted me, others have tried to meet with me and, recently, someone insisted that I read his book. I thought to myself, “Oh no, not another one!” I decided to take his advice anyway and read his book. Well, I followed his advice.”
“Most of all, the environment and our planet will benefit, because each appliance repaired rather than discarded represents a resource conserved and one less piece of trash. Repair is an integral part of Quebec and Canadian culture.”
“That is what Bill C-267 proposes: a response that is both simple and ambitious—a national framework for sustainable and repairable electronic products and essential devices. It is not a rigid regulation; it is not an encroachment on provincial jurisdictions.”
“It makes a lot of sense because it provides that things can be repaired instead of merely replaced, that we can be informed instead of being unaware, and that we can work together instead of imposing anything. (1830) [ English ] I think of the families in Bourassa and across the country who are watching what we do here today.”
“The European Union introduced a right to repair directive in 2024. The United Kingdom passed its legislation back in 2021. In the U.S., over twenty states have taken action with bipartisan support. Apple, Samsung, LG and Whirlpool are already adapting these standards to their other markets. This means a minimal burden for Canada.”
“Mr. Speaker, I am speaking today about Bill C-267 . Someone's refrigerator breaks down. They call a technician, who says that the part is no longer available, that the repair manual is missing or was never available and that the cost of the repair exceeds the price of a new appliance.”
The complete record
Every one of 360 lines we hold for Abdelhaq Sari, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 4 of 8.
“Our goal could not be simpler or more important: We want to build the strongest economy in the G7 by protecting Canadians' purchasing power and boosting our capacity to innovate and prosper. We want to invest, but what do we want to invest in? I will now talk about innovation, research and development. This is a key pillar of the strategy to modernize our tax incentive program for scientific research and experimental development, the much-talked-about SR&ED program. Why? It is because innovation is not a luxury. It is the very foundation of our future prosperity. I am not speaking in a vacuum. I myself come from an academic background. I come from the field of research, of technological innovation.”
“I want to reiterate, as the Minister of Finance has reiterated several times, that this budget will chart a clear path to build, protect and empower our country, Canada. I have said it before, I will say it again, and I cannot say it enough: We are living in uncertain times. As we know, Canadians are going through tough times, with geopolitical turbulence, supply disruptions and, above all, tariffs imposed by our neighbours to the south. All of this is obviously putting real pressure on businesses, families and workers. In this context, our government will not give in to fear or isolationism. On the contrary, our government made a choice. It chose to act—to act ambitiously, to act clearly and, above all, to act responsibly.”
“Mr. Speaker, as I rise today, I would like to start by stating a fact: We live in a world of uncertainty. All of the decisions that we are going to make, whether they are departmental decisions or decisions taken as part of a budget or government strategy, are really decisions that we have to make against the backdrop of a changing world. I speak of change, but I could also use the word “disruption”. We are truly experiencing disruptions, whether in our relationship with our neighbours to the south, at the economic level or in everything we have experienced recently. That is what I mean by the word “disruption”. That is why I am rising today to discuss the 2025 budget implementation act.”
“Mr. Speaker, today I want to talk about a novel that touches our hearts as much as it makes us think: L'ombre de tes lumières , by the author Kamal Benkirane. Using a simple yet deeply stirring writing style, Benkirane leads us into a story about love, resilience and a search for identity. He talks about families, communities, the often-fragile ties that unite us and the strength it takes to protect those ties. He encourages us to build bridges between generations and to listen to our histories while also looking to the future. He reminds us that dignity comes from the voice of dialogue and from the courage to build a truly inclusive society. In a Canada that is proud of its diversity but aware of the miles still to go, L'ombre de tes lumières is more than just a literary work.”
“Their presence in the legal process is not incidental, and it is not a number; it is essential. I truly believe that a justice system is stronger when it protects those who have been made vulnerable. That is why I believe that this bill is a necessary step toward building a fairer, more humane and more dignified system for every Canadian. It may be a small step for the legislative apparatus, but it is a huge step for every victim who, as of tomorrow, will finally get the explanation they have waited so long for. I encourage all members to participate in the study of this bill and to vote in favour of it.”
“It comes from a feeling of being neglected, of not being listened to, and of not understanding exactly what is going on. That is what inspired this bill: a family's suffering. Naturally, I share that point of view because it is vital that we do something about such situations. It is our duty to do so, for the spouse living with a silence that will never go away, for the family retraumatized by every court update, decision and deadline. This bill will not fix everything, but it is a concrete step forward toward a system that is better at recognizing victims and their experiences. (1755) When we give victims information that is clear, transparent, understandable and written in plain language, we are not just explaining our calculations; we are sending the message that their suffering matters and their safety matters.”
“The purpose of Bill C-221 is exactly that: to explain to victims how and why certain key dates are calculated and what this means for them in practical terms. It is a simple but profoundly fair approach. It does not challenge the courts' decisions. It does not compromise public safety. It does not hinder correctional professionals. It reinforces a fundamental principle: the dignity of individuals, the dignity of human beings, the dignity of victims. We know that this issue transcends party lines. This is not about politics; it is about compassion and humanity. Behind every case, there is a story. Today, we heard our colleague talk about one such story. When we listen to the details of that story, we can truly understand the depth of the anger that victims and their loved ones may feel. That is where a bill must come from.”
“They provide a portal for victims, as well as information letters, help lines and personalized support. I want to highlight this work, which is neither simple nor obvious. Despite these efforts, something fundamental is still missing, and that thing that is missing most of all is understanding. We are talking about human beings. We are talking about people. We are talking about the victims' understanding not just of the dates but of the meaning behind the dates; not just of the decisions that were made but of the logic behind those decisions. Understanding is not just an administrative detail. Understanding means being able to breathe again. Understanding means being less afraid of the unexpected. Understanding means regaining some control in a life that has been turned upside down.”
“Too often, they tell us that they feel invisible in a system they do not understand, a system where decisions that affect them are made without explanation, without context and sometimes even without warning. That is precisely what this bill seeks to remedy. Many victims feel hurt the most when they feel left out of the processes that determine what happens to the offender who has devastated their lives. Unfortunately, finding out that an offender is eligible for a temporary absence or parole without understanding how these calculations are made feels like an additional punishment for the victims. It is a punishment that we can and should avoid. Let us be clear. Our institutions, like Correctional Service Canada and the Parole Board of Canada, do important, sensitive work. They support more than 9,000 victims a year.”
“Madam Speaker, I would like to begin by saying that my heart is filled with emotion as I rise here today to speak to Bill C‑221 , especially after listening to my colleague earlier. This bill is not just about tinkering with the wording, regulations and provisions. As the House will hear from my remarks, this is about restoring some sincerity in how we treat human beings. I see this as something deeply human. I am talking about the way our justice system recognizes—or, unfortunately, sometimes forgets—those who have suffered the most, whom I will refer to as victims. When we hear from victims, they are not asking for any sort of privilege. They are asking for something much more essential: to be seen. They are asking us to listen to them. They are asking for respect.”
“Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague very much for her speech. Before I ask my question, I would like her to know that I agree with several points she raised. In my experience with the Montreal police force and as vice-chair of Montreal's public safety commission, I have been confronted with these realities. I have witnessed a surge in violence, particularly among couples. We are talking about financial aid, the appointment of judges, and so on. I agree on those points. Could my colleague also talk about the assistance we can offer in terms of prevention? That would be very important. What kind of help can we offer in terms of prevention, whether in Quebec or elsewhere in Canada?”
“Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague very much for his intervention and to congratulate him. I would also like to congratulate his father for his contribution to society. Since my colleague had limited speaking time, could he now explain how this bill could make it easier to collaborate with municipal and regional authorities and reduce crime committed by potentially very dangerous individuals on the streets?”
“Mr. Speaker, I would simply like to say that the future is not carved in stone. The future is what we make it. I would like my colleague to tell us what this budget does in terms of building. Is it an investment in building buildings, or are we also building Canadians' future? As far as infrastructure is concerned, can my colleague explain how this budget will also help people find jobs, including recurring jobs, after the infrastructure is built?”
“It is important to note that people actually cried with joy when they saw that the Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance had thought of them and these young people. People actually had tears in their eyes when we announced this wonderful facility, which is a facility of the future, an investment in our young people, an investment in our families and, above all, an investment that will help prevent crime among young people.”
“Madam Speaker, that is a very good question with two different aspects to it. First, why invest now? By investing in infrastructure, we are creating jobs. There are jobs created by the project itself, which is an investment, and future employment opportunities, which are ongoing jobs that can become permanent afterwards. Second, Bourassa, in Montreal North, is the only borough in Montreal that did not really have access to a sports centre. There are young people like Luguentz Dort, who won the NBA Finals. There are young people who have won robotics medals. There are young people who have done well in various sports, but who did not have the opportunity to have a sports centre.”
“On the contrary, our government is trying to propose a much more systemic budget that takes all of the elements into account to protect everyone's purchasing power.”
“Madam Speaker, I thank my colleague for that very good question because it focuses on people who we really listened to in the context of this budget. I would simply like to say that, although that measure is not included in the budget, there are other measures that take seniors into account. That said, it is really important to understand what we are doing here. Our primary goal is to deal with urgent situations, particularly when it comes to housing. We want to help people with their housing needs. We also want to mitigate the impact of rising grocery prices. All of these measures show that our government is looking to reduce household expenses, particularly for seniors. We have not forgotten them. Believe it or not, our government thought about all of the elements, and we have not forgotten anything.”
“Madam Speaker, first, I would like to point out that I have been in politics for more than eight years and that even my political aides do not write my speeches. These are not talking points from the Prime Minister or cabinet. Last week, I met several people who only wanted to talk to me about the budget. I would like to thank them for their trust, and I am repeating what they told me at the grocery store. This is a people-oriented budget that takes citizens into account. It is a budget that, above all, responds to challenges related to inflation and housing. We listened to the people, and this is a budget that aims to help them. I thank my colleague for the question and I want to reiterate that I wrote my speech from the heart. I wrote it myself, drawing inspiration from the comments that I heard from the people of Bourassa.”
“Our trajectory is prudent. Most importantly, our trajectory is sustainable. This budget is a choice for the future. It is a choice for confidence in our families, our youth and our communities. For Bourassa, this budget represents a promise of a future that is brighter, more visible, fairer and more prosperous. For our borough, the budget means investments that finally meet our needs and make a tangible difference in each and every person's life. The future is not carved in stone. The future is what we make it. Today, with this budget, we are choosing to build a future. We are choosing to build pride. We are choosing to build hope. We are building Canada strong.”
“Security continues to be a priority. Adding 1,000 RCMP officers, enhancing the Canada Border Services Agency, establishing financial crimes agency, and making significant investments in cybersecurity will make our neighbourhoods safer and more stable. I would like to share some comments made by seniors in my riding. They saw that budget line, which may look like a simple accounting entry, but to them, it represents a commitment to protection. Seniors are a prime target for cyber-attacks and financial fraud. They can clearly see that this line in the budget shows that someone is thinking about them, that people are the top priority. That is what budget 2025 is all about. Lastly, while the budget may be big, it is a responsible budget. Canada continues to have the lowest net debt in the G7. Our fiscal trajectory is sound.”
“In Montreal, Montreal North and in the riding of Bourassa, where so many families spend more than 40% of their income on rent, these measures will provide welcome relief. Eliminating the GST for first-time home buyers, speeding up housing construction through Build Canada Homes, and supporting community housing will make it possible to offer lasting and meaningful solutions. (1255) Budget 2025 also includes major investments in innovation, cybersecurity and advanced technologies, with $110 billion to modernize our economy. This means jobs of the future for young people in Bourassa. These jobs are designed and planned for a future where advanced technologies, including artificial intelligence, will be central to the jobs of tomorrow. It also means new opportunities and active involvement in Canada's digital economic transformation.”
“It is a place where dreams will be born and take shape. It is a show of confidence in our youth, a clear signal that Montreal North deserves the best and that our potential is unlimited. That is the very heart and soul of budget 2025: investing in people first, before investing in concrete and walls. The budget also makes major investments in sustainable mobility, in bus networks, in improving urban travel, and in energy and green transition infrastructure. These initiatives will make our streets safer, help our neighbourhoods adapt and contribute to a real reduction in the cost of living. In terms of housing, the budget allocates nearly an additional $25 million to improve access to suitable housing.”
“These investments include one that is especially important for our community: the sports centre in Montreal North. I would like to cast this project in a more human light, as it is about much more than bricks and mortar. It is about more than walls and buildings. We are not putting up a building, we are creating hope. We are building the future of our young people. We are reigniting the pride of a neighbourhood which has too often been stigmatized or forgotten. A sports centre is not just concrete and steel. It is a place where young and old alike can find out what they are capable of. They can spend a day there with friends or family members. It is a place where families can gather, where a community can feel at home, where its members can look out for one another and lift one another up.”
“If there is one area in which this budget marks a historic turning point, it is infrastructure. This year, the government is allocating $50.8 billion to modernize, expand and develop Canada's infrastructure. This is a huge investment and one that is absolutely necessary. Our infrastructure is the foundation of our prosperity. In my riding of Bourassa, we know how essential it is. Streets, parks, water systems, community centres, public facilities: These are everyday spaces that shape our quality of life. Thanks to this budget, Bourassa will benefit from safer, more modern infrastructure that is better suited to families, seniors and young people, including better-maintained streets, modernized parks and public spaces that are redesigned to be safer and more accessible.”
“We must act ambitiously and diligently in light of inflationary pressures, housing challenges, rapid technological transformations, geopolitical tensions and pressing infrastructure needs. Budget 2025 responds specifically to these challenges by focusing on meaningful investments that will have a lasting impact on our country's development. This is a budget for families and the middle class. A reduction of the rate for the first tax bracket from 15% to 14.5% this year and then to 14% in 2026 will provide meaningful relief to millions of Canadians. For a couple, a single parent or a young worker, this means hundreds of dollars more each year, direct support that leaves more room in already fragile budgets. This measure reflects a simple conviction: Prosperity must benefit those who create it.”
“Madam Speaker, it is with a deep sense of responsibility and great pride that I rise today to speak to the 2025 federal budget. Before I begin my speech, I just want to say that it has been over six months since I was elected and I want to once again thank the people of Bourassa for putting their trust in me and for giving me this responsibility. This budget is not just an accounting exercise. It is a vision, a road map that shows the kind of country that we want to build: a fairer, safer, more prosperous and more innovative Canada, a Canada where families are supported, where young people have opportunities for the future and where communities like Bourassa and, of course, the entire city of Montreal finally get the investments they deserve. We are at a critical juncture.”
“Mr. Speaker, the global economy is at a historic turning point. The international trading system is in turmoil, and new tariffs now seem to be the norm. Our country is suffering the consequences: a trade slowdown, job losses and growing uncertainty. Our main trading partner is not as reliable as it once was, which is weakening our economy. As we look forward to budget 2025, can the Minister responsible for Canada-U.S. trade explain to the House how this investment budget measures up to this historic challenge?”
“Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his intervention, which I would describe as very eloquent. I also want to commend the intelligence of his remarks. On that, I cannot be against virtue. I agree with him on several of the points he raised. I completely agree on the fact that there is no correlation between youth unemployment and the temporary foreign worker program. Far from wishing to contradict my colleague, I would like to add something. Would he and his political party agree that a program alone is not enough and that we need to work on a systemic approach, as he himself said? Would he be willing to support us if we decided to offer training programs to qualified individuals in order to help businesses?”
“Mr. Speaker, I would first like to thank my hon. colleague from Terrebonne for this bill, because I think it is remarkable. In Montreal, particularly on the West Island or even in Rivière-des-Prairies, there has been flooding that affected people's lives and their peace of mind. The member has taken a unique approach to this problem, which affects everyone. She raised a very interesting aspect in her bill, namely research and novel technologies. Can she elaborate on that? How can technology, including artificial intelligence and geomatics, and universities help us in connection with this bill?”
“Mr. Speaker, I will begin by answering the question asked by my hon. colleague. Who should we trust? We need to trust all Liberals who were selected by Canadians across the country. I want to make another point. Proposing amendments is one thing, but distorting a bill is quite another. When amendments alter the spirit of a bill, things get problematic. This is no longer committee work. This is an attempt to destroy or distort something that was designed for the good of people we want to welcome to this country, whether they are adopted, naturalized or immigrants.”
“Mr. Speaker, I have to agree when it comes to consistency. I also find it unacceptable that this descent issue, which was rejected by the Conservatives at the time, is now being reintroduced. However, we also have to be careful. If immigration is always associated with security issues, there is a risk of creating stigma. Security issues do not only involve immigrants; they affect the entire population, including people who were born here, who grew up here and who are unfortunately sometimes referred to as “old stock”.”
“Mr. Speaker, my colleague raises a good question. All I can say is that this bill will take national security, stability and verifications into account. I nevertheless invite my colleague to introduce the amendment. Our way of working, as a government, is to collaborate, coordinate and find some way to co-operate on all aspects, particularly on public safety.”
“I invite my esteemed colleagues to support this bill, which is fair, balanced and deeply human, so that Canadian citizenship remains a living promise, the promise of a united, open Canada that is proud of its citizens around the world.”
“It is a statement of principle on what it means to be Canadian in 2025. We live in a world of mobility, diversity and complexity. This bill does not restrict; it brings people together. It does not close doors; it ensures that the human thread connecting every citizen in Canada remains alive and sincere. Indeed, being Canadian is more than just a status. It is a sense of belonging, a bond of the heart and the memory. It is the pride of a country that is built by the people who live in it, contribute to it and choose it. Three years is not much time to learn to love a country, but it is enough time to never want to leave it again, as was the case in my experience. After three years of immigration, I loved this country. I found it really hard to distance myself from this beautiful country of Canada.”
“It is a commitment to a country that is known for its openness, diversity and justice. This bill reminds us that citizenship is passed down not just through blood or paper, but also through experience, contribution and solidarity. There also needs to be a balance between fairness and consistency. The three-year threshold applies consistently to all Canadians born or adopted abroad. It aligns citizenship by descent with the naturalization criteria, which ensures complete consistency and fairness. This will reinforce a simple idea: Citizenship in Canada is based on meaningful participation in the life of the nation. It is a shared responsibility, a shared bond and a pride to be nurtured. In conclusion, this citizenship is worthy of our country, our values and humanity most of all. Bill C‑3 is not a simple administrative update.”
“Bill C‑3 expands access, but in a balanced way. It ensures that the children born abroad to Canadian parents inherit not only a status, but also a real Canadian experience. Three years is how long it takes to integrate, work, study, establish friendships and contribute to Canadian society. It is how long it takes to love one's country, Canada, not from afar, but from within. (1535) That is why we say that it is not about living in Canada. It is about experiencing Canada, with its culture, its art and its values, while respecting its institutions, of course. It is a citizenship that is lived, not just inherited. This three-year substantial connection is not a barrier; it is evidence of attachment. Canadian citizenship is not a passport that someone just happens to get.”
“Canadian citizenship is a living legacy. This bill ensures that, from generation to generation, the connection to the country remains practical and meaningful. By making citizenship by descent possible beyond the first generation, but requiring this substantial three-year connection, we are creating a balance between openness and responsibility. We are not closing the door. We are firmly anchoring it in Canadian soil. We are telling every family that its citizenship is a right, but also a commitment to the community, to our democracy and to our shared values. This is a fair and lasting response to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. This reform is in response to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, which ruled in 2023 that the first-generation limit on citizenship by descent is unconstitutional.”
“They are researchers at other universities, diplomats, entrepreneurs, artists and teachers. Bill C‑3 recognizes this reality and takes it into consideration. It allows Canadians living abroad to maintain genuine ties to Canada while ensuring that every generation has also spent a meaningful part of their life here in Canada. The bill calls for the parent born abroad to have spent at least a total of three years in Canada before the birth or adoption of their child. These years may be non-consecutive. They may be the result of education, employment, a family commitment or community involvement. It is a modern, flexible and, above all, inclusive approach that respects life journeys while preserving the integrity of citizenship. I will now address the issue of intergenerational ties, which must remain strong.”
“This standard is based on an already well-established principle. To apply for citizenship, a permanent resident must have spent 1,095 days in Canada in the last five years. It takes three years to get to know and respect our institutions, to understand our values and to integrate into Canadian life. For Canadians born abroad, this same requirement strikes a balance. It keeps citizenship open to the world without removing it from its national roots. We want citizenship to remain a meaningful commitment, not merely an administrative legacy. Three years is proof of a real connection, a connection with lived experiences and an emotional connection in particular. It is a flexible and modern model, recognizing that the international context is always changing. Canadians travel, study and work abroad.”
“Mr. Speaker, today I rise to speak in support of Bill C‑3 , an act to amend the Citizenship Act, and to reaffirm the importance of the requirement for a substantial three-year connection. This measure is central to our vision of a strong, vibrant, and equitable Canadian citizenship. Every time we talk about citizenship, we talk about what it means to be Canadian. Not only is it a legal status, but it is an identity based on participation, respect, and responsibility. The question that arises from this bill is, why three years? Since second reading, the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration has conducted a thorough study of Bill C‑3. The witnesses were very clear: Being physically present for three consecutive years is the fairest and most realistic way to demonstrating a genuine connection to Canada.”
“Mr. Speaker, our government has always been there to support health care workers, the dedicated women and men who care for our loved ones and our seniors every day. My question is for the Minister of Health. Can she explain how the newly announced measures, including the tax credit for personal support workers and increased support for union training, will help strengthen our health care system and better support these truly dedicated workers?”
“Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague, the member for Terrebonne, for her eloquence and, of course, for her presentation. My question concerns the substantial connection test for members of the second generation. Why is this test necessary for members of the second generation born after the legislation comes into force, but not for those born before it comes into force?”
“Mr. Speaker, I believe the Minister of Public Safety has already answered that question. He has already made it clear that we are committed to strengthening recruitment in this field and to providing the necessary resources to combat trafficking at our borders. At today's meeting of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, the discussions were reassuring, and we are working to increase resources to combat trafficking at our borders.”
“Mr. Speaker, the main purpose of this bill is to establish greater coordination and collaboration between the federal government, the provinces, the municipalities and the regions. With that coordination, I do not think a single thing needs to be added, because every border and every region has completely different constraints. Coordination and collaboration are what is most needed, and that is what this bill delivers.”
“Mr. Speaker, I am not saying that my colleague's question is irrelevant, but it strays a little outside the scope of the bill. I can still give him an answer, though. This bill does not compromise national security. Quite the contrary, it strengthens identity and background checks, and it helps all stakeholders play a more proactive role in the fight against fentanyl trafficking.”
“Mr. Speaker, on the contrary, there is no duality. Rather, we are trying to strike a balance between openness and vigilance. That is very important. No one can say that the government has done nothing, quite the opposite. We invite our colleagues to come and discuss the matter in committee, because we simply must get the bill passed. What we are striving for is balance, not a duality.”
“That is the balance I was talking about. I am convinced that this bill will make our immigration system stronger and more deserving of Canadians' trust. I therefore ask my colleagues to support this important, balance-oriented legislation, and I thank them for their attention.”
“In short, these reforms ensure that our system remains both fair and secure. I would like to conclude by saying that I believe in this bill and hope that everyone in the House shares the same view. If there is one thing I can say about this bill, it would be that the government is acting responsibly and trying to strike a balance. The most difficult part of making these decision is maintaining a balance between openness and constant vigilance. I would also say that this bill is a major step forward and that it makes our immigration system more modern, more consistent and more compassionate, while maintaining that balance. It strengthens public safety while maintaining the humanitarian tradition that Canada is so proud of. This bill reflects the vision of a Canada that is open, yet orderly; welcoming, yet vigilant; caring, yet responsible.”
“I have spoken about this often here in the House. By improving information sharing between Ottawa, the provinces and local organizations, we are sure to succeed. This strengthened partnership will make our system more effective, fairer and more compassionate, as I said earlier. I will now talk about the public safety benefits. The safety of Canadians remains a top priority. We have seen human smugglers and criminal groups take advantage of irregular crossings to get around our system. (1625) Bill C-12 sends a clear message: Canada is still a welcoming country, but it is not naive. People who enter irregularly will have their cases dealt with through a fair removal process rather than by the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. This measure protects the integrity of the system and strengthens public confidence.”
“By simplifying the process, we are making the system more compassionate, but we are also making it more efficient and effective. Behind every asylum claim, there is a face, a human being, a story, and, above all, hope. I will now address the issue of integration with the territories and provinces. An effective system also relies on collaboration, coordination and communication. Bill C‑12 promotes a closer partnership between the federal government, the provinces and the territories. It modernizes the communications framework to enable the rapid and secure exchange of information on immigration, citizenship and passport services. Every day in my riding, Bourassa, I see how newcomers enrich our neighbourhoods. They contribute to our economy, our culture and our community vitality, including through their sporting achievements.”