Grace Fu Hai Yien
Singapore
“The Government takes a multi-pronged approach to address the disamenities from second-hand tobacco smoke. The National Environment Agency (NEA) works with Government agencies, Town Councils and community leaders to promote considerate behaviour and strengthen social norms.”
“The Government recently announced land-use changes in Lim Chu Kang to optimise our scarce land to meet our growing and evolving needs. We are at the initial planning stage and agencies are still working out the detailed development proposals.”
“Public Waste Collectors and Town Councils have trialled the collection and treatment of segregated food waste from households. However, participation rates are poor despite regular engagement and reminders.”
“The quality of incense offerings and the practice of burning incense are not regulated by law. Instead, the National Environment Agency (NEA) works with stakeholders, such as Town Councils, agencies and religious organisations, to encourage responsible burning of joss paper and incense.”
“The National Environment Agency (NEA) monitors public cleaning contractors through regular physical audits and remote monitoring, complemented by video analytics. NEA also regularly assesses the cleaning quality and outcomes of public cleaning contractors.”
“This question has been addressed in the Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment’s combined answer to Question Nos 15 to 18 on the Order Paper for 7 July 2026. [Please refer to "National Recycling Rates, Plans and Targets", Official Report, 7 July 2026, Vol 96, Issue 32, Oral Answers to Questions section.]”
The complete record
Every one of 2,293 lines we hold for Grace Fu Hai Yien, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 45 of 46.
“Mr Speaker, in reply, the answer is yes, we have a handful of cases of termination of leases. MICROWAVEABLE PLASTIC AND STYROFOAM FOOD CONTAINERS 6. Ms Ellen Lee Geck Hoon asked the Minister for National Development in view of recent studies showing that microwaveable plastic and styrofoam food containers commonly used in hawker food stalls may be carcinogenic when heated (a) whether AVA is looking into this; and (b) if it plans to mandate the use of alternative packaging for food products. The Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for National Development (Dr Mohamad Maliki Bin Osman) (for the Minister for National Development): Mr Speaker, Sir, under the Food Regulations of the Sale of Food Act, all food appliances that are imported, sold and used in Singapore must not impart harmful substances to the food stored in the containers and must be safe for their intended use. The plastic and styrofoam food containers that are commonly used in eating outlets are made of polypropylene and polystyrene. They are safe for use as food containers. Both types of packaging material for the production of food-contact plastics are approved in many countries including the United States (US) and countries in the European Union (EU). AVA's tests on these food containers available in Singapore show that they meet the safety standards set by the US and the EU, and do not pose any long-term health concerns. Consumers should use plastic containers for their intended purpose and in accordance with manufacturers' directions. For example, styrofoam containers are suitable for serving food and for packing take-away food but not for microwave heating. Only plastic containers that are labelled "microwave-safe" may undergo microwave heating.”
“This is an issue of performance indicators on the Town Councils. So it is between MND, HDB and the Town Councils.”
“Sir, in reply to the Member's question, I would like to assure the Member that HDB does perform regular inspections independently of Town Councils, and there are performance benchmarks that we have put in place on the various Town Councils.”
“Existing buildings will be required to comply with the provisions if they undergo major retrofitting works. Before that, we encourage building owners to undertake such changes by giving them incentives to do so. So we are basically taking a two-pronged approach to both require them to do so under legislation and also to provide some incentives if they choose to do so before the law requires them to do so. Question put, and agreed to. Bill accordingly read a Second time and committed to a Committee of the whole House. The House immediately resolved itself into a Committee on the Bill. - [Ms Grace Fu Hai Yien]. Bill considered in Committee; reported without amendment; read a Third time and passed. PHARMACISTS REGISTRATION BILL Order for Second Reading read. 5.20 pm”
“In reply to Er Lee's first question about how the work between a PE (Geotechnical) and a PE (Civil) has to be demarcated, I believe that there are already cases where PE (Civil) seeks the specialist's inputs of PE (Geotechnical). So I am sure, between the two professionals, they will be able to work out the arrangements. But, as I said, what defines a complex piling foundation is something that will be set out in the regulations, and that is something that BCA will be drawing up in due course. And this issue about Church Street, I am not sure if I agree with Er Lee that we must wait for one building to either have structural problems or collapsing because of specific geotechnical issues before we will enact the Bill. I think to do so would be very reactive and is not something that the Singapore Government is typically proud of. We want to be responsive, and I think that, arising from the COI on Nicoll Highway, it has pointed out certain systemic problems in the industry, including in the area of TERS. Because of that, we have reviewed the entire building process, including the permanent building works. And we felt that it is necessary at this point in time to stipulate this change. So whether the PE involved in the Church Street himself would say that it is effective, I would leave it to the industry and the professional bodies to make that judgement.”
“I queried them, in the past, which were the projects where they could show examples that if we introduced the PE (Geotechnical), then they would have avoided the problem totally. Kong lie kong ker, they could only quote me Church Street. And I asked them which aspect of Church Street. In fact, to prepare for this, I had lunch with Church Street's PE, and he also told me that he was doubtful with the introduction of PE (Geotechnical). That problem could be avoided. Just now, the Minister of State mentioned that less than 1% of new projects are 30 storeys and above. But is the Minister of State aware that there are some PEs where most of their projects are high-rise buildings?”
“We will take Er Lee's suggestions to include foreign workers, be it traditional source or non-traditional source, in this registration scheme. We will take that into consideration. Again, we will also take Dr Faishal's suggestion of working closely with the institute of higher learning and BCA has been doing that, together with MOE, WDA and NTUC, to conduct career talks, exhibitions, scholarship seminars and various exercises to attract talent into the industry. Recently, BCA has revamped its training institute into an academy for the built environment to provide more focus and high quality training for the professionals. We like the "Bob, the builder" idea and we totally subscribe to the idea of having a builder that has creativity and believe in teamwork. But we may have to find a name that is less gender-specific, with due credit to Er Lee who is sitting there. Madam, the proposed amendments will not only enhance building and construction safety, but also develop the industry to greater heights, and the changes are wide-ranging and adjustments have to be made. But it is necessary to take a long-term perspective. BCA will continue to work closely with the industry stakeholders, when formulating the detailed requirements in the regulations. Er Lee Bee Wah: May I have some clarifications, please? In a design of the foundation for building, in one formula, you have geotechnical and structural parameters, and I can see the confusion that comes in when you have two bees involved in the calculation. In fact, from the dialogue session that the engineers had with BCA, even among the BCA officers, the answers given seemed to be contradicting. So I think this is something that we need to fine-tune and look into.”
“To answer Er Lee's question about how many professional engineers have been sentenced to jail, I am very happy to say that none has been sentenced to jail. But does it mean that because there are none, that we should remove the custodial sentences? We do not think so. Because we believe that it is important to have deterrents put in place in our provisions that commensurate with the severity of the offences. As a respectable profession, we do not think that professional engineers will ask themselves to be treated differently from a manager at the worksite. By putting the sentence or the punishment at the same level as the Workplace Safety and Health Act, we think that it is a very fair and equitable treatment. In fact, a broader question is: how do we raise the image of industry and how do we attract more Singaporeans to join the industry? I am definitely supportive of Er Lee and Dr Faishal's call that we must make the industry an attractive one for young and talented engineers to participate in. Dr Faishal has suggested that we do more, and I fully agree with him. It is our aim to shape the construction industry into one that is progressive, professional and productive. And we believe that the best way to do so is really to show that our professionals are competent, that they discharge their duties with care and that the end results are good quality buildings, safe buildings. This is what the Bill seeks to achieve. We want to help our workers move up the value chain, improve their productivity, give them an attractive career path so that they can take home more pay. And with a more attractive pay structure and better career prospects, we hope that more locals will join the industry. This is what our new workers' registration scheme intends to achieve.”
“For example, the Building Control Ordinance in Hong Kong, the California Building Standards Code and the New York City Building Code have provisions for custodial sentence for serious offences committed by professional practitioners. In Singapore, custodial sentences may also be meted out for offences committed by other professionals. So it is not just an issue that is faced by professional engineers. Other professionals also have similar custodial sentences provided in their relevant legislation, such as the medical profession under the Infectious Diseases Act. Are higher penalties and custodial provisions effective deterrence? We believe so. Will higher penalties and custodial provisions dissuade people of high moral character - those characters that Er Lee has so convincingly described? Do we think that because we have high deterrent sentences, we will dissuade them to practise in their profession? We do not think so. In fact, as we see that the professionals are able to weed out the black sheep in their profession, that would increase the confidence that the society has on the profession and the trust that Er Lee has so passionately pleaded for. I would like to use an example of drink driving. We have very severe penalties for drink driving. But does that stop people from driving? I do not think so. People who are responsible on the road will continue to drive and they will discard their irresponsible act of driving after drinking. I think this is an example of what we believe in having deterrence or high penalties in our provisions. We have no intention of putting professional engineers in the jail just for the sake of doing it. It just serves as deterrence.”
“As I have said, for a Class 2 builder, looking at the financial requirements, we are talking about a firm with a paid-up capital of $25,000 being able to undertake a contract of $3 million. We think that it is a very reasonable amount. To have this company at $25,000 paid-up capital undertake a $10 million contract, I think we have lost the objective in the licensing. I would like to thank Ms Oslen for her support for Part IIIA. On the question about how we intend to ensure continued compliance, BCA's view is that it is most practical for us basically to work on feedback from the public, given that the number of buildings in Singapore is just too many. So we do not intend to work on a regular inspection but we hope that the public will help us in this enforcement area, and tell us if they felt that certain buildings or occupiers have basically been deprived of the use of the facilities that they were intended to. Whether the prescribed penalties are sufficient, our comment is that besides a $5,000 fine, we are talking about a possible jail term of up to three months. And I think that is sufficient deterrence for an offence under this provision. On the issue of penalties, Er Lee has made a very passionate plea on this subject. She asked whether it is necessary to increase the penalties or even have custodial sentences at all, for offences under the Building Control Act. I think the purpose of revising the penalties here is just to ensure that the severity and the offences commensurate with one another, and that the penalties serve as an effective deterrence. Custodial sentence is common for serious offences that could cause death or injury. We have also found custodial sentences imposed on professionals under the Building Control laws in other developed countries.”
“The Bill will thus treat TERS like permanent works and subject TERS to formal regulation under the Building Control Act. The other types of temporary works, such as scaffoldings, ladders, temporary floors and so on, will continue to be administered by MOM because they are more workplace safety related. On licensing of builders, Er Lee has expressed concern that the new requirements will adversely affect the smaller contractors. She specifically asked to allow Class 2 companies to be allowed to undertake contracts of $10 million, instead of $3 million, or that we set up an intermediary category. Our response is this. When we set up this regulatory framework, we actually benchmark the classes with the ability of the builders and the contractors. In other words, if we say that a builder with a paid-up capital of $25,000 is able to undertake a project of $3 million, that has been calibrated in terms of their ability as well as the risk they are prepared to take. If we were to raise that limit to $10 million, it means two things. It means that either we have lost the objective of these licensing requirements or we may have to increase the hurdles for companies to qualify at the $10 million mark, which, in a way, may reduce the number of companies that is able to be licensed as well. In this process of deciding what is the correct level, we have decided to choose a framework that is simple. Basically, it just has two categories: general builders or specialist builders. Within the general builders, there are two sub-categories: Class 1 and Class 2. For a start, we think that it is best to go for a simple framework and not to make it too complex.”
“Er Lee expressed concerns over the approval process faced by the industry professionals. She lamented that she has met problems in the approval process and that probably some agencies have been high-handed, more so than the rest. But what we would like to say here is that a building project is really a very complex one and, therefore, the approval process involves various agencies. To assist the industry, we try to streamline the process taken, and we have put in place an electronic submission system and we hope that through an online submission method, we can reduce the need for repeated documentation, and so forth. But we are open to suggestions and we definitely want to see improvement in this area. So, if Er Lee could provide us with specific cases or processes where improvements can be made, we will be very happy to attend to them. On the regulation of temporary works or TERS, Dr Faishal has asked whether the regulation of all temporary works could come under one agency, be held under one umbrella, which is what the work is being done between MOM and MND. Let me explain how this demarcation came about. Traditionally, temporary works, both above and below ground, are considered as construction methods used by the builder to facilitate the construction of permanent structures. They are not defined as building works and, therefore, they are not regulated under the Building Control Act. So, these works have been regulated under the legislation on worksite safety. However, following the Nicoll Highway incident, we recognise the need to treat TERS which are used to support ground excavation as a special category because TERS can have a very high safety impact, not only within the worksite, but on properties around it.”
“We hope that the cost of PE (Geotechnical), even though it has risen, as Dr Faishal has said, before the legislation, will be tempered with more PE (Geotechnical) being registered in the coming months. Our local university can definitely play a part in developing more expertise in this field by conducting post-graduate Master's courses. And I would like to assure the House that we are definitely very mindful of the need to balance safety on one hand and not adding on additional or undue regulatory burden. I think the fact that we have Er Lee who called for lesser penalties and removal of custodial sentences and, on the other hand, Ms Olsen was asking for greater penalties to be added, shows the kind of delicate balance that we have to take in balancing the needs, both of ensuring safety which we are doing for the safety of the public and also not adding additional undue cost or inefficiency to the system. And to show what we mean by that, the building of 30 storeys high, the cut-off that we adopted will actually make up less than 1% of the total number of new buildings constructed last year. So, you can see that we do not set a benchmark that is too difficult for the industry to meet. We also noted that similar practices have been adopted in overseas jurisdiction. In Hong Kong, geotechnical inputs from a registered geotechnical engineer are required for building foundations of all buildings, regardless of storeys and height. BCA will basically calibrate the requirements in the legislation. As Er Lee has pointed out, there are different types of foundations and, therefore, I think that the detailed requirements will be documented in the regulations and will be finalised with the industry inputs.”
“And the types of foundations used in these high-rise buildings could be complex. Currently, although the design can be done by Professional Engineers (Civil), as Er Lee herself has said, in circumstances where the foundations are complex, Professional Engineers (Civil) do seek out specialist's inputs on geotechnical elements. So I am sure that by formalising this requirement and doing so judiciously for a very limited number of buildings, we believe that between the Professional Engineer (Civil) and the Professional Engineer (Geotechnical), they will come up with some amicable working relationship, because this relationship already exists at the present day. So what we are doing here is really to formalise the requirement of Professional Engineer (Geotechnical) and Accredited Checker (Geotechnical) for the complex piling requirements. And what is considered as complex, I think Er Lee has mentioned a series or types of foundations which I have no intention of engaging her on. Basically, it would be something that we will be discussing with the industry and formalising in the regulations. The BCA will be writing a subsidiary legislation and that is something that we will discuss with the industry. In fact, we have done quite a bit of industry and public consultation, and many of the feedback have been taken into consideration. Dr Faishal has also asked whether there are sufficient geotechnical specialists to meet the new legislative requirements. BCA's assessment is yes. The Professional Engineers Board has actually commenced registration for specialist geotechnical PEs since last year. And now we have more than 50 registered PE (Geotechnical), of whom two-thirds are Singaporeans, and we expect more to be registered in the coming months.”
“Mdm Deputy Speaker, I must, first, thank Members for speaking on this Bill. We have had very passionate speeches from Er Lee Bee Wah, Dr Faishal and Ms Olsen. All of them were in support of the essence of the Bill that we are discussing today. It is really for Singapore to progress and to maintain our reputation as a city with good first-class infrastructure. We need to improve the regulatory framework with a view to improve the safety standards of the construction industry. I would like to take specific comments given by the Members. First, on the point of building works requirements, Er Lee asked whether it is necessary to require a geotechnical specialist to design the geotechnical aspects of the foundations of buildings which are 30 storeys and above. What we are talking about is really buildings that are 30 storeys and above, and these high-rise buildings do have very demanding requirements on the piling and the foundations. They can be very complex and therefore, what we are saying in this Bill is that only the geotechnical aspects of it are to be designed by Professional Engineers and checked by Accredited Checkers, both of which are to be registered as geotechnical engineers; in other words, Professional Engineer (Geotechnical) and Accredited Checker (Geotechnical). Any structural problems with the foundation of such high-rise buildings actually will have very serious consequences, especially so in Singapore when we are so densely populated and quite built-up as well, and we have certain lessons to be learnt in the past. One such lesson was an incident involving a high-rise building at Church Street. If Members can recall, it started to tilt when the foundations were found later to be faulty.”
“Can the Minister please give specific examples of problems with tall buildings in the past that could be avoided if we had the services of Professional Engineers (Geotechnical)? Next, I think the amendment to the Building Control Act on licensing of builders would affect the operation of smaller construction companies. There is concern that many local construction companies will only be eligible for a Class 2 licence, which is for works up to the contract value of $3 million. Medium-sized projects, eg, bungalow upgrading works, nowadays easily cost more than $3 million. It would take some time for such local companies to change their business structure to qualify for the next Class 1 licence. My recommendation is either to introduce another intermediate category or increase the contract value to $10 million for a Class 2 licence. Lastly, I agree that it is ideal to develop a core skilled and experienced workforce. While the details of the scheme are being worked out, I would like to urge the Ministry to consider both traditional source and non-traditional source workers who have worked in Singapore for a period of time to be considered as localised workers in the computation formula, as it is extremely difficult to get Singaporeans to work in construction sites. I would like to conclude, by the stroke of the pen, that we are going to affect the decision of many bright Junior College students. And by raising our hand high, we are going to affect the way high-rise buildings are designed and the livelihood of many existing Professional Engineers. Mdm Deputy Speaker, I support the Bill, but I certainly hope that the Minister will consider my suggestions and concerns. 4.45 pm”
“In fact, after the collapse of the Nicoll Highway, many of my friends in the construction industry had expected the Government to introduce more measures to strengthen safety at construction sites, as usual, they say, the typical knee-jerk reaction. In fact, they dare me to bet with them. To them, some changes are not necessary. One such example is the new requirement of introducing Professional Engineers (Geotechnical) for prescribed foundation on works for buildings more than 30 storeys. What do you mean by "prescribed foundation work"? If you talk about cassion, raft foundation, fine. We do not do this very often. And when we do this, anyway, we will always seek opinions of Geotechnical engineers. But certainly, not for piling works, such as bored pile or percussion piles which are used practically in every project, and we have been doing projects of 30 storeys and above for so many years. All along, the foundations of high-rise buildings have been designed by professional civil engineers, and only when they consider it necessary would they engage a geotechnical engineer to assist. With this new amendment, whether there is a need or not, the developer must employ a geotechnical engineer. It is not only a waste of money - we may think that it is only a small fraction - but it is also a waste of precious time. When there are two professional engineers involved in the design of an element, the accountability can never be clear. As a practising engineer, I can tell you that this is not practical and unnecessary. We may be aware that most of the problems are at the temporary works construction, not the permanent works design. Are we addressing the root cause of the problem?”
“I would like to ask the Minister what would be the consequence or setback if the penalty is not aligned with those in the Workplace Safety and Health Act 2006? Will our Professional Engineers be less professional? Will our buildings be less safe? I tend to believe that the answer in the prevention of any lapses in the line of work of a professional lies not in raising penalties. Rather, we should raise the level of education, thereby enhancing knowledge and improving the manner in which they go about their responsibilities, the Code of Ethics, for example. I therefore ask the Minister not to revise upwards the current penalties spelt out in the existing Act. In fact, we should abolish the jail term totally. The next point I like to speak on is the role of Professional Engineers as the "gatekeeper" for the Building and Construction Authority, who has the last say in the entire construction industry. The current law imposes penalties on Professional Engineers, but the same is inapplicable to Government officers who approve construction projects. Why should these officers be tempered with a "light touch" while the Professional Engineers face the prospect of getting the book thrown in their face? Why should they be treated differently? I am not advocating punishment for Government officers, but I just want Members to understand the feeling and low morale of the Professional Engineers. Next, I would like to raise the issue of Professional Engineers (Geotechnical) which has been proposed for design of foundations of structures of heights that are 30 storeys and above.”
“How do we attract good people? Job satisfaction, remuneration, recognition and a congenial working environment are among a few that I can think of. Today, before this House stands a motion to amend the law that will increase the penalties for Professional Engineers if they are in default. The proposed amendment seeks to double the fines and jail term. With the strengthening of the regulatory framework, it is expected that professionalism, quality and safety in construction will be raised. In my opinion, it is therefore not necessary to also increase the penalties for offences under the Act. Many are already having concern working in the construction industry. We should not overdo things that could result in brain-drain of talented individuals from the construction industry. As it stands, there are already sufficient disincentives to deter the best brains from applying to join the profession. A few years ago, I asked one of my staff. He has been with me for many years. I said, "Why don't you go and apply for Professional Engineer?" Straightaway, he resigned. He said, "I do not want to be subject to undue pressure." So enhancing jail terms as a penalty will send a wrong and negative signal to those who may harbour any ambitions to be an engineer and, in so doing, would undoubtedly make them ask a few pertinent searching questions: shall I study engineering? What if I ended up working in the construction industry? Why do I want to subject myself to such severe penalties? Why is there a need for the penalties to be increased if indeed, the profession is doing well and held in high esteem? Madam, may I ask Minister, in the last five years, how many Professional Engineers were sent to jail under the Building Control Act? Is there a need to raise the penalties?”
“Hence, from the picture painted, you can see that not anybody can be a Professional Engineer. With regard to the backdrop that I have painted earlier, in order to get people who can attain that level of learning, who can make sound judgments, especially in times of uncertainty, who can put the interests of others before self, you need to attract people that not only possess scholastic aptitude, but also with the moral character. The engineering profession I have, on previous occasions, brought up in this House the issue of unattractive compensation that is received by Professional Engineers, in comparison with other professions. Surprisingly or not, more than 40% of our Ministers and top civil servants are either trained as engineers or hold an engineering degree, and I can tell you that there are many more residing in the top hierarchy of the corporate world. Indeed, these figures will appeal to those who are thinking of enrolling into engineering courses. However, the compensation for those who choose to stay as professional engineers pales in comparison to the earnings of the top echelons in the public and private sectors. Nonetheless, a core group has chosen to stay on and practise, and this bodes well for our country. Today, engineers have a significant contribution to make in our nation building. The many engineering feats that they have accomplished - from underground train tunnels to flyovers, high-rise buildings and NEWater - are testimony of their professional skills. However, the torch must be passed on from one generation to another. There must be a continual flow of good people willing to come into this profession, just like we need good people to enter politics and serve the nation. We need engineers in many industries, not just the construction industry.”
“Professionals thus have an obligation to serve the community with the high standards expected of them, and they are expected to fulfil their responsibilities by working out solutions that place the interests of the community above all else, including their own. Accordingly, in order to perform their roles effectively, these professionals must be able to examine all their options without any external influence or pressure. As such, their clients - be it an individual, a community or an entire society - will have to place some trust in their judgments and conduct. High standards I entirely agree that a high standard of work must be maintained by professionals involved in the construction industry. I recognise that a great many lives are at stake if any degree of negligence or incompetence is allowed to slip into the construction process. I welcome the proposed changes that will improve construction safety. However, changes have to be measured as more rules and regulations may not always solve all problems. If you ask any developer, architect, engineer or builder, you will hear the loud sigh at the multiple approvals that a plan has to obtain before it is given the final stamp of approval by the authorities, which include the Building and Construction Authority, among others. Some are more high-handed than others. The Professional Engineer is given the task of "gatekeeping". It is an onerous responsibility which, over the years, judging by the number of building projects that have sprung up in Singapore, has had a good track record. What this means is that we need good people - and by good, I mean more than just the moral character, but also people who have the intellect - to be drawn to the profession.”
“Without natural resources, its success can be attributed to the skills, dedication and commitment of our local engineers. They have made it possible to house the entire nation, to have a dynamic CBD skyline, a seamless road network, efficient airport and seaport, to name a few, making Singapore one of the greatest cities in the world to live in. Our local engineers are the enablers and providers of infrastructure, which is the basic drive for economic growth. The construction industry has been put in the spotlight in recent times, and all for the right reasons. When I say this, I am referring to the number of new construction contracts being awarded - and that means jobs for construction companies as well as related professional companies in industries such as architecture and engineering. Building construction is constantly evolving as well, and buildings are soaring to new heights. This factor, combined with the increased complexity in modern designs, demands more from professionals involved in their planning, design as well as construction. Being a professional Before I go any further, I think that it would be appropriate that I give a quick summary of defining the characteristics of a professional. Professionals are people who have to undergo specialised learning and training with some depth in their field. They have acquired knowledge which has been accumulated over the years of their working life. As professionals, they are required to maintain a high standard in the execution of their responsibilities because the lives, welfare and well-being of others depend on it. The professional is thus expected to make sound and reasonable judgments in matters of importance, and on issues of uncertainty.”
“Notification of any contravention Currently, the Act imposes a duty on the QP and builder to notify the Commissioner of Building Control of any contravention of the Act or Regulations relating to their project that they know or ought reasonably to know. This duty will be extended to the developer, who is also a key party to the project. Conclusion Mdm Deputy Speaker, building safety cannot be left to chance, and complacency has no place in any construction project. Utmost attention must be paid to enhance the professionalism and safety standards of the industry. In amending the Building Control Act, we are mindful that the measures to be introduced must be practical and not add undue regulatory burden and cost. BCA has also consulted the industry widely on the proposed measures in this Bill. There was general agreement that these measures would help to enhance safety standards and that the cost increase would not be significant. I also want to make the point that the cost of not taking active measures to uplift the safety and professional standards in the construction industry is potentially much higher. This Bill will put in place an enhanced building control framework to help industry stakeholders move towards higher standards in safety, quality and professionalism. Madam, I beg to move. Question proposed. 4.27 pm Er Lee Bee Wah (Ang Mo Kio): Mdm Deputy Speaker, to begin with, I will declare my interest as a passionate practising Professional Engineer. In the last few days, some of you asked me what is this "Er" that is being added to my name. "Er" actually stands for Professional Engineer, not because I have a new husband. Singapore's amazing journey from a Third World country to a developed nation in a short period of 42 years is a miracle to many.”
“This is necessary to meet the needs of our rapidly ageing population and to make Singapore an inclusive society. The Bill will also have provisions to deal with similar problems where other performance requirements in a completed building are subsequently negated in the course of occupation and use. Other amendments Madam, we have also taken the opportunity to make other amendments to improve some of the existing provisions in the Act. I will now highlight the more important ones. Dangerous buildings and occurrences Firstly, there is a new provision in Part IV to allow the Commissioner to order an inspection of any building in close proximity with dangerous building works. The current law only limits the order for inspection to the adjacent buildings. In addition, the Commissioner is empowered to issue an occupancy order to direct the owner or occupier of the dangerous building to restrict the number of people allowed in the building at any time or until the Commissioner is satisfied that any inspection or remedial works that he ordered are completed. Disciplinary procedures governing ACs We are also strengthening the disciplinary procedures governing the ACs. The Bill allows the Commissioner to appoint a lawyer to help him in an inquiry against any AC, specialist geotechnical AC or AC Organisation, and to recover the costs and expenses incurred in conducting such an inquiry, up to a maximum of $10,000, from the ACs or AC Organisation. This is similar to the provisions for disciplinary inquiries in the Professional Engineers Act and the Architects Act.”
“In this regard, the person shall be guilty of a separate offence for each day that he continues to refuse or fail to do that act or thing after the stipulated time. Standards on environmental sustainability Madam, I shall now move on to the relevant sections of the Bill which support our emphasis on sustainable development. Clause 15 of the Bill will empower the Minister to make regulations on minimum standards of environmental sustainability for new buildings and existing buildings undergoing major retrofitting works. While a green building is likely to involve higher development cost, on a life-cycle basis, the savings gained from operating a green building will more than offset the higher upfront cost. With widespread adoption of green building technologies, the upfront cost will also decline. With the new provisions, we hope to see more environmentally-friendly buildings with greater energy and water efficiency, and constructed using sustainable methods and materials. The recent disruptions of sand and granite supplies from Indonesia are useful reminders of the need to embrace sustainable construction. Sustainable construction involves the use of materials that are recyclable, reusable and readily available from many sources. It will help to reduce our reliance on concrete and, hence, materials like sand and granite. New Part IIIA on continued compliance with performance requirements Presently, there are cases where provisions for disability access in completed buildings are being frustrated by irresponsible owners or occupiers. To address this problem, we have added a new Part IIIA to require building owners or occupiers to ensure that physical features provided to facilitate mobility are not altered, removed or obstructed.”
“As a licensing condition, Class 1 general builders will be required to deploy a minimum number and composition of registered Trade Foremen and Tradesmen in selective key construction trades for projects of value $10 million or more. The detailed requirements will be prescribed in the Regulations. Revocation of licence The Bill also sets out the circumstances under which the Commissioner of Building Control can revoke a builder's licence. The Commissioner must however give the builder an opportunity to be heard before revoking the licence. The Bill will also allow the Commissioner to consider less severe actions, such as a suspension or a fine, in place of revocation. In addition, there will be a provision for appeal to the Minister. To prepare the industry, a six-month grace period will be granted for general builders and specialist builders to apply for a licence after the relevant part of this Bill comes into force. Revised penalties for non-compliance The COI for the Nicoll Highway incident had also commented that "Accidents can be prevented through higher penalties for poor safety management". In moving the Workplace Safety and Health Bill last year, the Minister for Manpower has asserted the need to ensure that penalties for non-compliance are set at a high enough level to reflect the true cost of poor safety management. This Bill will align the penalties for offences under the Building Control Act with those for offences of similar severity under the Workplace Safety and Health Act (WSHA). The Bill also introduces an amendment concerning continuing offences. It makes clear that where it is an offence if any act or thing is not done by a particular time, the obligation to do so will continue, even after the stipulated time has passed.”
“We will license general builders and specialist builders engaged in six categories of specialist building works. To be licensed, firms must be financially sound and have good safety records as well. They must also appoint key personnel with suitable qualifications and experience to be responsible for managing the firm and supervising the execution of construction works. The proposed licensing scheme will ensure that our builders are professionally qualified and competent. It will also spur firms to upgrade themselves and, as a result of that, raise the overall competency of the industry. There will be two classes of licence for the general builders. A licensed Class 1 general builder will be allowed to participate in all projects, while a licensed Class 2 general builder is restricted to projects of value not more than $3 million. For specialist builders, there will be different types of licence, each authorising a specific area of specialist building works to be carried out as a business. These include specialist works in piling, ground support and stabilisation, site investigation, structural steel, pre-cast concrete and on-site post-tensioning. The intention is to ensure that only competent licensees are allowed to execute these specialist works, given the inherently high risks associated with such works. A general builder's licence or a specialist builder's licence will be valid for up to three years and is renewable. Conditions on construction personnel Madam, consistent with the objective to produce professional builders, we aim to develop a progressive workforce that is anchored by a stable core of skilled construction personnel.”
“The minimum composition of the QP's supervision team will vary according to the value of the project, which is correlated to the scale and complexity of the project. In addition, site supervisors will have to be accredited by BCA or a specified professional body. Site supervisors will need to go for continuous vocational training, to ensure that they remain competent and keep abreast of new technical requirements and skills. Independence of project parties Madam, the Committee of Inquiry (COI) for the Nicoll Highway incident had highlighted that the relationships between some project parties could potentially give rise to conflict of interests. The Bill will address this concern. It will specify the circumstances under which certain project parties should not be associated with one another. Firstly, for major construction works, the Bill will require that the QP who supervises the structural works and his supervision team shall not be associated with the developer. Secondly, the instrumentation specialist shall not be associated with the builder and will have to be appointed by the developer. Lastly, the existing provisions requiring the AC to be independent of the builder will be extended to the geotechnical specialist AC. I would like to stress that these provisions are not meant to replace the ethical codes of the various professional boards. They are meant to prevent situations where the professionals are placed in a position of conflict of interests, as this could lead to construction safety being compromised. New Part VA on licensing of builders Sir, the builders are key players in ensuring construction and building safety. Clause 9 of the Bill has added a new Part VA to put in place a licensing scheme to set minimum standards of professionalism for builders.”
“The Bill will subject the design and construction of TERS to greater rigour of control. The design of TERS will need to be done by a Professional Engineer (PE) and reviewed by an Accredited Checker (AC). A PE will also be required to supervise its construction. In addition, PEs and ACs who are specialists in geotechnical engineering must prepare the geotechnical aspects of TERS in deep excavation works, which are defined as excavation going deeper than six metres. The requirement for inputs by geotechnical specialists will also apply to other major geotechnical works, such as tunnels greater than two metres in diameter, underground structures deeper than six metres, and complex foundations of tall buildings. Like TERS in deep excavations, these works involve great complexity in geotechnical engineering and have considerable safety impact. Duties and independence of project parties The Bill has also reviewed the roles and responsibilities of various key stakeholders involved in construction projects, given that they play a critical part in ensuring safety at various stages of construction. Division 4 of Part II spells out the duties of the developers, Qualified Persons (QPs), site supervisors and builders as well as the requirements to enhance the independence among the various project parties. Provision of adequate site supervision Currently, the QP is obliged to appoint at least one qualified site supervisor, regardless of the size or complexity of a development, whilst the builder is not required to do so. The amendment will require both the QPs and builders to provide adequate site supervision to ensure that building works are carried out properly and safely.”
“The Bill also incorporates amendments to set minimum standards of environmental sustainability for buildings as well as to require compliance with the performance requirements in the Building Control Regulations, in particular, the provisions for disability access. Over the past two years, the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) has consulted the industry stakeholders extensively on the measures to be introduced. A public consultation exercise was also conducted. The feedback has been considered, and some suggestions have been incorporated into the Bill or will be taken up when drafting the relevant subsidiary legislation. Madam, let me now explain the key amendments of the Bill. Repeal and re-enactment of Part II Many of the amendments are related to Part II of the Act, which covers the "control of building works". We have reorganised it into seven divisions to cover the following changes. Regulating of underground building works First, the Bill will require formal and more stringent regulation of major underground building works as these works have significant safety impact. In particular, temporary earth-retaining structures (TERS) will be treated like permanent works. TERS are structures used in excavations to support the earth while permanent structures are being constructed. These are the structures that failed in the Nicoll Highway incident. Currently, unlike permanent works, TERS are only regulated through conditions imposed in the permit to commence structural works. The design and construction of TERS can be very complex due to variable ground conditions and the density of our built-up area. They deserve greater attention and scrutiny in the building regulatory process.”
“Mdm Deputy Speaker, I beg to move, "That the Bill be now read a Second time." Background Madam, the Bill aims to strengthen the building control regulatory framework to uplift the professionalism, standards of safety and quality in the construction industry. The construction industry plays a vital role in shaping and developing Singapore into a distinctive global city. It ensures that our built environment is safe, of high quality and also environmentally sustainable. It is also an important sector of our economy, constituting about 4% of our GDP. Going forward, the sector is expected to expand strongly, with construction demand projected to reach between $19 billion and $22 billion this year. It is hence important to make sure the construction industry remains strong and professional. By its very nature, any construction incident can potentially cause loss of lives and considerable damage to properties. The Nicoll Highway collapse in 2004 was a wake-up call for the construction industry. The observation that the incident could have been avoided was most regretful. Following the incident, MND and MOM set up the Joint Review Committee on Construction Safety, or JRC, to systematically examine the regulatory framework at various stages of the construction process, including the roles and responsibilities of the key stakeholders. Building Control (Amendment) Bill This Bill will put in place various measures recommended by the JRC to enhance professionalism and safety standards in the construction industry. These include the regulation of underground building works, provision of adequate site supervision, ensuring independence of parties in a construction project, licensing of builders and raising of penalties for non-compliance.”
“There is a lot of undergrowth in the water, according to the residents as well as SCDF rescue team. Does this undergrowth pose any danger to the users of the kayak centre? If yes, what else should be done?”
“For the incident at Lower Seletar Reservoir on 27th May this year, it was found that the man and his wife had strayed out of the designated kayaking area, despite being briefed by the staff of the water activities centre on the safety procedures and the limits of the designated kayaking area. I would like to assure the House that there is an adequate safety system and procedures in place for water activities carried out under PUB's auspices. Water activities such as canoeing or kayaking are allowed only at authorised water activities centres under the supervision of the centre staff. These are run by experienced operators, such as the People's Association or the National Sports Associations, who have a responsibility to manage and oversee the activities to ensure that they are carried out properly and in accordance with safety procedures. The safety procedures include safety briefings, checks that the boaters have put on their life vests properly, and inspections to ensure that the canoes and kayaks are in good condition before the commencement of activities. Although safety measures have been put in place, the public needs to adhere to them, and also exercise individual responsibility and good sense when having fun in the water. With the formation of the National Water Safety Council, PUB is working closely with the Council to promote and enhance water safety in our reservoirs and waterways. PUB is also working with the Council and the Ministry of Education to weave in water safety messages in their talks to schools as part of PUB's ongoing public education programme. Er Lee Bee Wah (Ang Mo Kio): Two supplementary questions. The first question: are there any additional safety measures implemented before reopening the kayak centre at Lower Seletar?”
“Mr Speaker, I thank the Member for the suggestion. But, I think, in these two cases, they occurred in a nature reserve and also a park within the reserve. In this case, we have to always take a very careful approach to balance the need to retain the environment as close to nature as possible and to provide accessibility to visitors. Some of the measures that we could take, for example, in cutting down some of the trees near the paths may be very detrimental to the nature and, therefore, we should really be quite careful when we adopt that. Also, accessibility, in terms of the road paths for checking and maintenance purpose, has also imposed difficulties for us. But we will definitely take the suggestion of the Member and study it. DROWNING INCIDENTS AT RESERVOIRS 12. Er Lee Bee Wah asked the Minister for the Environment and Water Resources how many people had drowned in reservoirs over the last ten years and how many of these cases occurred at Lower Seletar. The Senior Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for the Environment and Water Resources (Dr Amy Khor Lean Suan) (for the Minister for the Environment and Water Resources): There were 21 drowning incidents in reservoirs in the last 10 years. Five of the incidents occurred at Lower Seletar Reservoir, and the rest were spread over the other seven reservoirs. Of the 21 incidents, one of them occurred during a water activity operated by an approved water activities centre. This was the incident at Lower Seletar Reservoir on 27th May 2007, where a man drowned after his kayak capsized. The other 20 cases did not arise from such water activities. Most of these cases were open verdicts, while a few were suicide cases.”
“NParks has a regular programme on checking the trees. Where periods of continuous rainfall or strong winds have happened, we have also taken measures to close the nature park, if necessary. Following the incidents, we will step up warnings to the users of the park. But in the case of the central catchment area, I think we did close the park to visitors but, unfortunately, the group of visitors had already passed the gates.”
“NParks will continue to improve its tree maintenance programme. It will take measures to increase public awareness on avoiding forested areas during inclement weather. It will also look into additional safety measures, such as increasing the number of rain shelters and instituting periodic closing of trails for maintenance.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, NParks has sufficient checks in place to ensure that our trees do not pose a safety hazard to the public. Its team of arborists undertakes a rigorous tree inspection regime to ensure the health and condition of the trees under NParks' charge. With the help of the latest technology, the arborists are able to detect conditions such as cavities and decay that are not visible to the eyes. They also prune our trees regularly to remove weak, dry or overgrown branches. This reduces the weight of foliage in the tree crown and improves stability. NParks has benchmarked its tree expertise against international best practices. Its arborists are certified under a curriculum set by the International Society of Arboriculture. NParks offers the same certification to tree care professionals in the private sector and other public agencies. NParks also advises public agencies and other land owners on tree-care standards. NParks' tree maintenance programme has reaped positive results over the years. It currently maintains more than one million trees along roadsides, in parks and on vacant lands. The annual number of fallen trees and branches has reduced considerably from about 4,000 in year 2000 to about 1,000 in 2006. However, it is not possible to eliminate tree-related accidents altogether. While tree diseases can be diagnosed and brought under control, there are elements of nature that are beyond our control. The recent incidents at the Bukit Batok Nature Park and the Central Catchment Nature Reserve were cases in point. The incidents were caused by a combination of strong winds and heavy rain. In addition, it is also a challenge to maintain trees in nature areas because of limited accessibility and the need to strike a balance with conservation.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I believe this question is much better channelled to the banks. But since they are not here, I think it is not a question that MND is privileged to answer. ADMISSION INTO LOCAL UNIVERSITIES 3. Mr Zaqy Mohamad asked the Minister for Education in light of local students not being able to gain admission to the three local universities despite the increase in the number of places (a) whether he will provide an update on the recent admission exercise for local universities; and (b) what measures are taken by his Ministry to ensure that local A-level and polytechnic students have sufficient places for accredited tertiary education in Singapore. 4. Mr Zainudin Nordin asked the Minister for Education (a) whether our local universities are producing enough graduates to meet the needs of our industries; (b) what is the average growth in the number of local university places in the last ten years; (c) whether local universities are able to cope with the increase in intake; and (d) whether the local universities' vision to have more international students is being achieved at the expense of local students.”
“When we look at this assistance measure that we are putting in place, we are really looking at a very small subset of the applicants. Not all downgraders are not given access to financial market. Many of them, despite the need to downgrade, can access the bank loan market and, therefore, should do so. I would say that what we are doing now is to limit to a very small subset that not only could be looking at downgrading as an option but, because of their past problems - it could be bad credit histories or that they may be involved in litigation - that has basically barred them from accessing the commercial loan market. So this is really a small subset. I agree with the hon. Member that we have, in a way, to apply our subsidy very judiciously and, therefore, we are looking at a smaller subset that Mr Cedric Foo has mentioned.”
“Mr Speaker, I would like to thank Dr Faishal for the supplementary question. HDB will expedite such appeal cases. But, fundamentally, we would like, as much as possible, to encourage these buyers to explore the commercial market first. As I have clarified, it is not HDB's intention to re-enter this market with a loan at market rate. We are only there to help very exceptional cases and, in most cases, we have to be thoroughly assessing the situation and we have to satisfy ourselves that indeed they do not have any access to the bank market before we grant a loan. Concessionary rate loans are heavily subsidised, especially if we think about it over the loan period. Therefore, we view these as a subsidy. For us to offer another loan at market rate is really just to help the very few cases who we think genuinely have problems with access to bank market to find financing for their home.”
“Sir, currently, columbariums are allowed within places of worship as well as other institutional premises, such as clan associations, homes for the aged, nursing homes or religious schools. This is to provide for the needs of members of such institutions, as well as members of the community. Increased public accessibility inevitably means that these columbaria are located closer to residents. We are mindful of residents' concerns over the presence of columbaria in their neighbourhoods. Therefore, proposals involving columbarium use in places of worship are carefully evaluated, based on the following stringent guidelines: First, the columbarium must be integrated with the place of worship building. It must be co-located with the religious use in the same building and not be in an independent block; Second, it is to be completely screened from public view. The columbarium should not have any openings facing residential houses; and Third, the columbarium use cannot exceed 20% of the total gross floor area of the development. To avoid possible traffic congestion or parking problems in the surrounding residential estate, road access and sufficient car parking lots within the development site are also carefully evaluated before columbarium use is allowed. The columbarium also is required to provide its own car parking facilities in accordance with LTA's requirements. Where possible, access to the site should be taken directly from the main road without having to pass through a residential estate. These measures have helped to minimise potential disamenities arising from the location of columbaria at places of worship near residential areas.”
“Companies requiring resources to undertake these initiatives can also tap on the ADVANTAGE! scheme. So far, approximately $8 million has been committed to companies under the scheme. These initiatives, coupled with the strong economic growth in the past year, have helped boost the employment rate of older residents in Singapore. Between 2004 and 2006, the resident employment rate of those aged 55 to 59 improved from 55.9% to 60.6% while that for those aged between 60 and 64 rose significantly from 33.6% in 2004 to 41.9% in 2006. Both are at record high levels. The Tripartite Committee will be releasing its final report shortly. The Committee will recommend additional initiatives to facilitate the employment of older workers. We will continue our efforts to work with the tripartite partners to enhance older workers’ employability.”
“For the continued security and harmony of Singapore, we should strongly support all these efforts. Terrorist ideologues have been unrelenting in spreading their ideas to win recruits, supporters, and sympathisers. The Government and the Malay/Muslim leaders must actively counter their rhetoric. RETRAINING OF AGED FRATERNITY TO REJOIN WORKFORCE 5. Mdm Ho Geok Choo asked the Minister for Manpower (a) what are the challenges faced in (i) retraining and helping the aged fraternity to rejoin the workforce; and (ii) encouraging employers to recreate jobs; and (b) what are the measures planned or in place to encourage more employers to embrace job re-creation for older employees. The Minister of State for Manpower (Mr Gan Kim Yong) (for the Minister for Manpower): Mr Speaker, Sir, the challenges to enhancing the employability of older workers are multifaceted. We need to shape employers’ mindsets towards older workers and encourage them to recruit and retain older workers. At the same time, we also need to help our older workers stay competitive by keeping their skills up to date and relevant. The Tripartite Committee on the Employability of Older Workers, in its interim report released last year, recommended several key initiatives to improve the employability of older workers. These include promoting age-friendly employment practices, such as the re-creation of jobs for older workers through job re-design, automation and the modification of job roles. Last year, NTUC, SNEF and WDA successfully assisted more than 12,000 workers under the Job Re-Creation Programme (JRP). About half of them were mature workers. The Tripartite Action Group (TAG) was set up last year to facilitate sharing of best practices among companies to re-create jobs and raise productivity.”
“They provide religious counselling to terrorist detainees and those under Restriction Orders, as well as their families. The RRG and MUIS also help to counsel other individuals who have fallen for radical and violent ideology. Religious counselling is part of the overall rehabilitation of detainees. When detained, the detainees are interviewed by ISD for their knowledge of the terrorist network and operations. At the same time, effort is made by the asatizah volunteers in the RRG to try to rehabilitate them, in particular, to show them that the terrorist ideology which they had imbibed is misguided and against what Islam teaches, and to guide them to the correct teachings and interpretations of the religion. As part of rehabilitation, the detainees also interact regularly with ISD psychologists, case officers and their families, and are given opportunities to improve themselves, for example, through access to a library and pursuit of academic courses. Rehabilitation takes time, as the detainees have been deeply exposed to JI teachings. It is unrealistic to think that, overnight, they can be convinced that their JI beliefs are wrong, and hence released. That said, several detainees who were less deeply indoctrinated have been released. We will continue to try to rehabilitate the others. But it is worth highlighting that a number are adamantly holding on to their radical and violent beliefs. Also on their own initiative, RRG members have reached out to the public to explain the misuse and abuse of Islamic concepts by terrorists, so that other Singaporeans will not unwittingly fall for the terrorist propaganda. MUIS and several other Muslim organisations have done likewise. They have conducted many public forums and talks, and also reached out through the media.”
“Mr Speaker, in reply, the prices are not hiked up. It is the actual replacement price that we have to pay. The primary reason is because of transportation cost. The cost compared to importing from Indonesia and a country that is further afield would involve greater transportation needs and therefore the landed cost has actually gone up. So the price at which we are releasing the stockpile is really the cost to the Government. Of course, there is this issue about cost-sharing for existing projects. But for new project, it will be a different matter. The contractor, the developer, and the owner will then be able to discuss cost issues in a different manner because they are not bound by existing contracts. Contractors will price their construction cost at the new cost of sand and granite. So, it is really not tenable for the Government to subsidise across the board, because there are projects, for example, which will enter into a new phase of awarding contractors and we definitely want these contracts to reflect the replacement cost, which is the current market price of sand and granite. RELIGIOUS REHABILITATION GROUP (Update on activities) 4. Dr Fatimah Lateef asked the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Home Affairs if he will provide an update on the activities of the Religious Rehabilitation Group and what is the progress in the management of the remaining Jemaah Islamiyah detainees. The Senior Minister of State for Home Affairs (Assoc. Prof. Ho Peng Kee) (for the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Home Affairs): Sir, the Religious Rehabilitation Group or RRG is a voluntary group formed by some Muslim religious scholars and teachers on their own initiative.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, we are monitoring the prices. The price of the HDB's stockpile is released at the replacement price. And that is the only sustainable way for us to both replenish stockpile and, at the same time, release it for the use of the construction industry. It is actually benchmarked using our replacement price from purchasing from various sources. As much as the Member has said, if the prices would come down, we would be monitoring it. Also, we would like to say that at this point in time, while we are releasing the stock from our stockpile, the private sector actually has the ability, and they have in fact done so, to import sand and granite on their own. So, if there are alternative sources at better prices, we actually encourage the private sector to do so and import by themselves. On the Member's second question, it is not something that we would get involved in the private sector, as far as cost-sharing is concerned. Because we understand that they have their commercial arrangements which we are not in a position to dictate or regulate. But the Government has taken steps. For example, the Ministry of Home Affairs (Singapore Prisons Service) has started to make monthly progress payments for the cost-sharing arrangement that I have mentioned earlier on. So, that has already taken place. We are not waiting to the end of the project. We are already making progress payments to help the contractors to meet the higher cost of sand and granite at this point in time. We hope that the private sector will follow suit, and we encourage all parties to look at the issue in totality and work together as an industry to overcome the problem.”
“Er Lee Bee Wah: Mr Speaker, Sir, I would like to ask MOS whether the Ministry will adjust the price of sand and granite from HDB's stockpile downwards as there are more and more alternative sources available. Can the Ministry please also update the House on the state of the cost-sharing in private projects due to this sand and granite issue?”
“Thank you very much, hon. Member, for raising this issue. We are definitely doing with all the mitigating factors considered in totality. Starting from dewatering of the quarry, we will make sure that the marine life in the surrounding area is well taken care of. We will measure the content that is being discharged and we will also manage the discharge rate at which the water is being released into the surrounding area. We are very mindful of the marine life in the neighbourhood. We are also mindful of the safety issue. So, we want to make sure that, for example, in the immediate surrounding area, safety precautions are taken, that we do sound a siren before blasting takes place and that we will cordon off the area with barricades when the blasting takes place. And, of course, dust generated as a result of blasting will also be monitored and managed. We have chosen the Kekek Quarry in Pulau Ubin because it is far away from the residential area. So, we make sure that the impact on the residents of the island is also minimised. And, most importantly, the transportation leg is closest to the sea, to a barge, and therefore it minimises disruption to the island life as well. Definitely, we want to keep the island as it is as much as possible. It is a place for leisure which we will continue to maintain it to be. Blasting and mining activities will not take place over the weekends and not at night. On an overall basis, we will also rehabilitate to make sure the quarried area is well taken care of at the end of the process. So, these are all the various mitigating factors that we will consider. And we have also made sure that the plants and the nature life are well protected on the island.”
“The impact of the price increases in sand and granite, we estimated, would be about 2% of the overall project cost. I think that is not a very significant proportion and definitely in this current state of the market, we believe that it is still in a very good position to benefit from the upswing. Mr Charles Chong (Pasir Ris-Punggol): Mr Speaker, Sir, the Minister of State mentioned that we may restart limited granite quarrying in our offshore island of Pulau Ubin. Could the Minister of State confirm that should we restart this granite quarrying, all environmental protection measures will be taken not only to protect our environment but also to demonstrate to some of our neighbours that granite quarrying can be achieved without damage to the environment, without the outer islands disappearing, and without compromising our maritime boundaries?”
“Ms Denise Phua is concerned about the impact of higher sand and granite cost on overall construction cost and has asked about steps taken to prevent unjustified increases. Let me just explain that construction cost may change because of many factors, not just the prices of construction materials. For example, the increased demand for skilled manpower as a result of higher construction volumes will have an impact on overall construction cost. Similarly, we do expect the major adjustments that the industry is making, following the disruption in supplies of concreting sand and granite from Indonesia, to cause construction cost to rise. The Government is monitoring the situation closely and will look into specific complaints on cases of unjustifiable increase in prices. In addition, in response to requests by some contractors who want to produce their own ready-mixed concrete, we are releasing suitable sites for the setting up of new batching plants. Others who are interested to produce concrete are also welcome to bid for these sites. Meanwhile, as a developer and an owner of projects, the Government will help the contractors by co-sharing up to 75% of the price increases in sand and granite. Public agencies have started to make progress payments. I urge the private sector developers to follow suit. All stakeholders in the construction industry - developers, contractors and concrete suppliers - must work together to cope with this short-term disruption to the industry and to move towards a more sustainable position in the longer term.”