Rachel Ong
Singapore
“Chairman, many PwDs and employers remain unaware of available support for inclusive employment and daily living. A recent Singapore Management University (SMU) survey found that eight in 10 PwDs had never heard of employability training programmes and fewer than half of employers were aware of workplace grants and hiring incentives.”
“Chairman, today, very few counsellors are trained in Singapore Sign Language. Thus, deaf clients often rely on interpreters from an already small community. This often limits privacy and discourage self and help-seeking. One deaf individual received counselling only after a long search.”
“Chairman, the misuse of AI, particularly through sexually exploitative deepfake content, is creating new risks. Children and vulnerable persons, including persons with disabilities, may face impersonation, coercion and greater difficulty reporting harm.”
“Chairman, during an MRT disruption last year, a deaf commuter shared that she felt confused and afraid when passengers began to leave the train as there were no visual or sign language updates explaining what was happening.”
“Chairman, I support the Government's strong investment in AI skills for Singaporeans. Expanding the TeSA programme to help non-tech workers gain practical AI capabilities sends an important signal, that AI is no longer a niche skill, but a foundational one.”
“Chairman, unattended cooking remains one of the leading causes of residential fires in Singapore, according to the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF). Many of these incidents involve our seniors, where distraction, medical conditions, or reduced mobility quickly turn an everyday activity into a serious safety risk.”
The complete record
Every one of 204 lines we hold for Rachel Ong, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 2 of 5.
“As a growing number of our seniors of tomorrow will be different from the seniors of today, we will need to evolve our approach to meet their changing needs and aspirations. To further empower them, I propose extending grants, similar to those given to youths-led initiatives, to retired seniors interested in starting community programmes. With the right support, their experience and wisdom can drive meaningful projects that strengthen communities and address local challenges. Third, destigmatising mental health. Addressing mental health among seniors requires understanding the unique challenges they face. Unlike younger generations, who increasingly embrace the idea that "it is okay not to be okay", many seniors still harbour deep-seated fears and misconceptions about mental illness. Most mental health resources in Singapore are in English, leaving non-English-speaking seniors underserved. To bridge this gap, we must use media platforms familiar to them, such as Channel 8, Suria and Vasantham, to openly discuss mental health issues through dramas and talk shows. This will spark conversations in coffee shops and hawker centres, often where our seniors gather. Radio, too, remains a trusted source for information and entertainment, making it an ideal medium for airing mental health segments in various dialects. This Saturday, the Telok Blangah Community Club will host a “Mental Health Wellness Carnival” designed for Chinese-speaking seniors, with hopes to extend this to other languages. Our Government’s success in using targeted communication during the COVID-19 pandemic shows the power of reaching seniors where they are at, achieving remarkable uptake rates and safeguarding this vulnerable demographic.”
“Feedback has shown that these precious seniors look forward to the innocence and unreserved nature of our youths, while our children enjoy spending time with our seniors, especially those who miss their grandparents. I hope to replicate such initiatives across more neighbourhoods. Let us also rethink volunteering opportunities for seniors. Many are eager to contribute but find traditional models rigid. Recently, I met a resident in her early 70s who wanted to pass on her tui-na techniques, a vocation she has practised for decades, as a way of giving back upon her retirement. By offering skills-based initiatives beyond hobby-centric programmes, we can engage seniors who are willing and able to share their skills and expertise. For example, at our Telok Blangah Legal Clinic, a retired lawyer continues to contribute his knowledge to both the volunteer team and residents. Beyond structured programmes, we should empower seniors to take ownership of their community spaces. The "Ibasho" model from Japan offers a compelling example. What began as a simple café run by seniors in Ofunato has evolved into a thriving hub with a garden, ramen shop, farmer’s market and daycare. Closer to home, we see a similar concept in the Health District @ Queenstown’s FaithActs Active Ageing Centre, which includes upcycling workshops, digital clinics and cooking classes. Such endeavors give seniors a sense of purpose and foster inter-generational bonds. Imagine retired hawkers mentoring younger residents to prepare meals for vulnerable families or seniors who love gardening teaching students to build gardens in schools. At Telok Blangah, Chef Benny Se Teo shared his cooking skills with our community, with sessions so popular that we are planning another one in March.”
“I call on MOH and MOM to collaborate with employers and unions to incorporate pre-retirement planning that prepares young seniors in their 60s emotionally for this transition. This planning should help them adjust to new routines, social networks and purpose-driven activities. Additionally, the Government can consider incentivising companies, unions and associations like the Singapore National Employers' Federation to implement structured mental health programmes for seniors, similar to the support we provide businesses hiring seniors. Second, strengthening Community-Based Support Networks and Senior-Led Initiatives. Once seniors leave the workforce, staying engaged in meaningful activities becomes essential for their mental well-being. Social connection is the most powerful safeguard against mental health decline in seniors. Community engagement and support groups must, therefore, form the core of our strategy, providing spaces where seniors feel a sense of belonging and purpose. First, we need targeted support groups for new retirees, widowers and those struggling with depression. Organisations like Silver Ribbon and the Samaritans of Singapore (SOS) have shown that peer-led support, particularly from those who have navigated similar challenges, is highly effective in reducing isolation amongst our seniors. It is especially crucial to ensure support for seniors in their 80s, who often experience the loss of close friends and spouses, leading to a shrinking social circle. Intergenerational interactions also offer a meaningful form of community engagement. At Telok Blangah, NTUC Health partners Blangah Rise Primary School every third Monday of the month to run sports activities, where our seniors and students connect.”
“Some observe that children or extended family often choose video calls over in-person visits, deepening their sense of isolation. Here are the proposed interventions to support the mental health of our seniors. First, may I acknowledge the excellent work already done by our Government and agencies for the welfare of our seniors, including the Agency for Integrated Care (AIC), Age Well SG, Healthier SG, SG Digital Office, as well as Active Ageing Centres I have the joy of working with across Dover, Depot and Telok Blangah; Active Global, FaithActs, Montfort Care, NTUC Health, St Andrew’s Senior Care, St Andrew's Hospital and Sunlove. Building on these efforts, we must make mental wellness the next frontier in ensuring Singapore is a safe place to age well. Before outlining specific interventions, it is important to recognise the diversity among seniors. They go through distinct life stages; young seniors in their 60s-70s, seniors in their 70s-80s, and seniors 80 and above, each facing unique challenges that require tailored mental health strategies. The first proposed intervention: Pre-Retirement Mental Health Preparation and Workplace Support. Mental well-being must be developed early. Just as we encourage financial planning for retirement, we must also advocate for mental health preparation before seniors enter their later years. Missing this window to equip them with coping strategies could mean missing the opportunity altogether. The transition out of active employment is a critical mental health juncture. For many, work provides more than income. It is tied to identity, purpose and social connections, especially for men. The loss of these can lead to anxiety, depression and even cognitive decline, if not addressed early.”
“Many, particularly men, are unprepared for widowhood or retirement and struggle with isolation as they try to build new support systems. The stigma surrounding mental health worsens the issue. Many seniors fear being labelled "siao", or “crazy” in English, and the term 精神问题, “mental health problem”, carries strong negative connotations. Psychiatric care is often equated with institutionalisation. Unlike younger generations, who benefit from awareness campaigns, seniors often suffer in silence, avoiding help due to societal perceptions. The rise in scams targeting seniors adds another layer of distress. Many who lose their life savings in financial and love scams feel too ashamed or afraid to confide in their families, intensifying their emotional turmoil. This sense of shame, rooted in our Asian "face-saving" culture, can spiral into severe depression or even suicide. Additionally, digital isolation has become a growing concern. As society becomes more digital, many seniors struggle to keep up, leaving them unable to access important services or stay connected with loved ones. The shift to online banking, tele-health and digital Government services has made it harder for those without digital literacy to reach essential resources, thus increasing frustration and feelings of helplessness. A senior from Depot Road shared with me just two nights ago, “我英语不好，电脑不会” or “I’m not good in English, nor do I have computer skills". This dear resident earnestly appealed for more patience and understanding from the community at large. Furthermore, the increasing reliance on digital communication by younger generations means fewer face-to-face interactions with seniors.”
“Mr Speaker, I am deeply appreciative of Budget 2025, a thoughtful and responsible Budget that addresses a wide range of needs to support Singaporeans, from alleviating the cost of living to providing meaningful assistance across diverse demographics. I thank Prime Minister and Finance Minister Lawrence Wong and his team for their leadership. As I have engaged with residents, many have expressed how the disbursements projected for this year come at a timely moment as families plan their budgets for the year ahead. Today, I wish to focus on an urgent and critical issue: strengthening mental health support for seniors in Singapore. Earlier this month in Parliament, I spoke about the importance of mental health support for children and youths. In this Budget Debate, I call for immediate action to address the growing mental health challenges faced by our seniors. The correlation between mental health struggles and suicide is well-documented and, for seniors, this issue is particularly alarming. Seniors aged 60 and above now account for nearly 30% of suicide cases in Singapore. Many of them face profound grief, loss and significant societal changes as they age. Yet, they are the least likely to seek help, either from healthcare professionals or informal networks, compared to younger cohorts. This highlights the urgent need for targeted intervention to support their mental well-being. While our existing mental health strategies have made strides, more can be done to support our seniors. Singapore is not just ageing; we will soon become a super-aged society. It is time we recognise and address the unique mental health challenges faced by our seniors. Our seniors face a series of irreversible losses; spouse, friends, physical health, employment and independence.”
“My hope is that we can create a future where every person and every family can flourish in their own lane.”
“Despite being educated, competent and possessing a diverse range of skills, many caregivers find themselves in jobs that under-utilise their talents and pay them significantly less simply because these positions offer the flexibility they desperately need. Faced with the demands of both childcare and job hunting, caregivers of children with severe disabilities are often forced to accept whatever opportunity comes their way, regardless of whether it aligns with their qualifications or financial needs. Given that reasonable accommodations for this group are still not legislated, I urge the Government to allocate resources and collaborate with employers to create job opportunities that offer FWAs, while also recognising and leveraging the professional expertise of these caregivers. Just as SG Enable works with companies to facilitate employment for PwDs, could they consider expanding their efforts to include caregivers of individuals with severe disabilities and rare disorders? These caregivers possess valuable skills and experience that, with the right accommodations, could greatly benefit both the workforce and the companies that hire them. The challenges facing our youth and families of children with disabilities are deeply intertwined. They call for a collective, unwavering response. We must not only protect our young people from the harmful effects of social media but also empower them to build resilience and emotional strength for the future. At the same time, we will stand with families who are navigating the complexities of raising children with disabilities, offering consistent and meaningful support. These are not issues that can be solved with temporary fixes or half-measures. They demand our sustained commitment, compassion and urgent action.”
“This is surely not an isolated case. We must not be afraid to get help. Parents need to be equipped to recognise these challenges early. I am always blessed when parents approach me, unafraid to seek help in this area. They come fully aware of how social media and constant digital communication have impacted mental health. I will now move to the second pressing challenge: supporting families of children with disabilities. Beyond screen time concerns, another group I am concerned about are families of children with disabilities. We must not forget this special group and ensure they receive support through every stage of caregiving. Currently, childcare leave ends at age 12. May we explore considerations for parents caring for children with disabilities who require long-term medical care? I propose extending childcare leave for parents of children with disabilities with high support needs, to at least age 18. In addition, I urge the Government to increase the number of paid leave days per year for them. If extending leave is not feasible, FWAs should be legislated, with medical certification required to prevent abuse. I also look forward to the expansion of the Enabling Services Hubs, for which I am very, very grateful. This will provide much-needed respite for caregivers of persons with disabilities (PwDs). As I have highlighted in previous speeches, FWAs are not merely a preference for caregivers. They are an absolute necessity. This group, in particular, faces a unique set of challenges. They need steady income to support children with high and often complex support needs.”
“Without distractions, meaningful conversations flourish. I love this same question families can ask at the dinner table daily: "what is one good thing that happened to you today?" We can expand initiatives that empower parents with strategies for creating screen-free zones at home while also helping them monitor and guide their children's online activity. By equipping parents with these tools, we can foster healthier relationships with technology, benefiting both teens and parents. I have seen this shift happening in some of my residents. During house visits, I have observed families making conscious effort to use phones and computers only in shared spaces, like the living or dining room. This is such a wise practice and I sure hope it becomes the norm across all families. Beyond IMDA's Digital for Life resources, schools could consider making workshops on healthy digital boundaries compulsory for parents. Just as parents know exam schedules and school entry requirements, they should also learn how to help their children navigate the digital world responsibly. Parents also need to feel equipped to have open conversations about the risks and benefits of technology and social media, especially when it comes to mental health. These discussions are urgent during the pre-teen and teen years, when children are most vulnerable. More importantly, parents can create space where their children feel comfortable sharing their online experiences and emotions, free from judgement. A friend of mine only recently learned, in an open conversation with her son, that he had been severely bullied online when he was 13. He is 21 today. She now understands why he struggled with anxiety attacks and depression throughout his teenage years and into junior college.”
“If I may be clear about this, the solution is not adding more structured activities to already packed schedules. A conversation with two clinical psychologists revealed something startling. They each had different teenagers share with them, saying: "A dog's life is better than mine; at least they have time to rest and play." Think about the weight of that statement. These youths were not just making casual observations. They see how family pets receive affection, rest and the freedom to play, while they feel they have to earn affection and rest through achievements. The encouraging news is that many families are already making unstructured outdoor activities a regular part of the family life, whether through walks, cycling or simply spending time together at a nearby park – and Singapore is blessed with many amazing parks. I hope parents will continue to prioritise regular family outings and protect their time with their children. Third, strengthen parental support. Being a teenager today is challenging and being a parent of one may be even more demanding. In an era where screens dominate nearly every aspect of daily life, it is crucial for parents to have the right tools to set clear boundaries around screen time. Children observe everything about their parents. If they notice their parents are not addicted to their devices, they may just follow suit. Parents must be intentional in modelling healthy tech habits. Smartphones should not control us. Instead, we must take back control over how we use them. A friend of mine practices what is referred to as "digital Sabbath", where she turns off her phone for a significant period each day to be fully present with her children. This simple, yet powerful habit has become a precious gift for her family.”
“How might MOE review the secondary school CCA system, to ensure that every student who wishes to engage in a sport beyond Physical Education classes has the opportunity to do so? At the same time, I acknowledge the practical challenges the Ministry faces, such as limited resources and logistical constraints. Nevertheless, we can explore solutions that balance these realities while ensuring all students have access to physical activities that energises them. Just as Earth Hour gives our planet a much-needed break and Home-based Learning Day prepares students for remote learning, I propose the introduction of Disconnect to Connect Week, a dedicated week for students to disconnect from social media and replace it with real-world social connections. A recent experiment involving a group of US teens who swapped their smartphones for flip phones for just seven days yielded striking results. While some experienced minor inconveniences, the majority reported improved focus, better sleep, more meaningful family conversations and increased time spent outdoors with friends. For this initiative to succeed, the disconnection must be paired with opportunities for authentic human connections. Without these, even the best intentions risk falling short. Our schools and families must collaborate to make this happen. We need to provide easy access to opportunities like sports, community volunteering and other meaningful pursuits that encourage real-life interaction. Parents play a crucial role in shaping a child's relationship with technology. One of the most effective ways to counter social media's negative effects is by encouraging outdoor activities as a regular part of family life.”
“Finland offers a great example by integrating outdoor play into its school curriculum, recognising its profound benefits on mental and physical health. Closer to home, I am inspired by Blangah Rise Primary School, where some classrooms intentionally open to a garden. Each morning, the teachers take their students to the garden to explore nature, gifting them a peaceful outdoor space. This simple yet powerful practice supports a holistic development. Our co-curricular activities (CCAs) system lays a strong foundation for youth development and MOE's recent decision to remove primary school CCA trials is a commendable step forward. This change allows children to explore sports without the added pressure of performance, fostering a more inclusive and enjoyable experience. However, many secondary school students still face barriers to participating in sports CCAs. Parents have shared that it remains challenging for their children to join sports they are interested in or want to try, as trials are still required in some schools, even for non-competitive participation. At this stage of their development, when a teen expresses interest in taking up a sport, our response should be, "yes, come and try", not "sorry, you're not good enough". How many parents have seen their teen come home dejected after being turned away because they were not considered "good enough"? Could there be a deeper connection between young people turning inward to social media to channel their energy, energy that could be far better directed towards sports that not only promote physical health but also foster real-world social connections?”
“Singapore has rolled out initiatives such as the Cyber Wellness and Digital Literacy programmes. Building on these efforts, I would like to share three key considerations for better protecting our youths in today's digital landscape. First, delay social media use. I urge parents and teens alike to consider delaying social media use until at least age 16, or for as long as possible. This recommendation, supported by the research of Mr Haidt, is not arbitrary; it is rooted in the critical stage of brain development during adolescence. The prefrontal cortex, which plays a crucial role in regulating emotions and controlling impulsive behaviour, does not fully develop until around age 25. I am not suggesting that social media should be off-limits until adulthood. But science does show that the older the teens are, the better they can manage their emotions and navigate the complexities of digital spaces. Until then, unchecked exposure to social media can easily undermine their self-worth and emotional well-being. Just as we delay giving teens the keys to a car or access to bear arms, we must also delay their entry into the world of social media. The older they are, the better equipped they will be to handle the pressures that social media often amplifies, such as comparison, anxiety, insecurity and envy. Singapore is currently studying Australia's proposed ban on social media for those under 16. Even in the absence of legislation, I urge parents to delay social media exposure and stay vigilant about what their teens are engaging with online. Second, promote outdoor play and physical activity. To help teens disconnect from social media and nurture their overall well-being, we must create more opportunities for outdoor play and physical activity.”
“As Jonathan Haidt powerfully puts it in his book "The Anxious Generation": "The rise of social media isn't merely a passing trend but a seismic shift in how young people relate to themselves and each other." Recent studies have shown that frequent social media use can significantly impact adolescent brain development, with heavy usage linked to poor mental health and increased social isolation among young people. In contrast, youths who spend more time outdoors, engaging with others and connecting with nature tend to develop stronger mental resilience and better social skills. This contrast underscores the need for regulators and parents to view social media with enlightened eyes; to see it not as harmless entertainment, but a force that can make or break the well-being of our young people. We must therefore approach it with awareness and responsibility. In fact, we should scrutinise social media with the same vigilance as products that pose risks to our health. Just as governments regulate tobacco to protect public health and parents limit junk food to safeguard their children's well-being, we must take decisive steps to shield our young from the mental health risks of unchecked social media use. The stakes are too high to ignore; stronger measures are not just an option, but a necessity. Countries like South Korea and Finland have set an example. South Korea has introduced "Digital Detox Zones" and camps, while Finland prioritises outdoor play in schools. Australia equips parents with tools to manage children's screen time via the "eSafety Commissioner". Singapore must continue to take steps to ensure our children will not be trapped in a digital world that constantly compares them with often impossible standards.”
“Mr Speaker, I stand in full support of this Motion. As we call for the continued review and updating of policies to better support families, we must confront two pressing challenges. The first is how social media is reshaping our children's minds and relationships in ways we are only beginning to understand. The second is more structural; the daily challenges faced by families raising children with disabilities, challenges that often remain invisible to many. The first: protecting youth development in a digital age. Since 2021, one key focus in our Telok Blangah Division is "Building Stronger Families". This commitment is reflected in a range of initiatives, including father-child programmes, a curated Mental Health Series, support for caregivers and initiatives to enhance seniors' well-being. In 2021, we also launched the "Telok Blangah Mentoring Club", designed to journey with our youths aged 11 to 17. I love our youths. And after decades of working with them, I have grown increasingly concerned about the impact of smartphones and social media on their well-being. The effects are real and harmful when left unchecked. I intend to dedicate a significant part of my speech to safeguarding our young in the digital age, particularly amid the challenges of social media. I recently addressed this topic during the Edusave 2025 as well as Bursary Award Ceremonies. A good number of parents and older youths later approached me to share similar concerns. It is clear that this issue resonates deeply with our community, highlighting the urgent need for collective action and support. Unchecked social media use does not just change how our children communicate, it rewires how they see themselves.”
“Like a bridge that creates access, these accommodations open the doors to equal opportunities. Together, let us construct a bridge to workplace fairness; one that leaves no one behind and ensures everyone can cross to the other side comfortably. Mr Speaker, I support this Bill.”
“These programmes should aim to raise awareness and foster understanding among hiring agents and managers, about what constitutes discriminatory behavior towards PwDs. Understandably, many may be unaware of what fair requests and reasonable accommodations entail. This also underscores the critical role of the Advisory on Reasonable Accommodation in ensuring the successful implementation of WFL. As WFL rolls out, particularly with clarifications on reasonable accommodations and what constitutes discrimination, may I emphasise the importance of making grievance handling processes accessible to PwDs? This means ensuring that both online forms and physical spaces for filing grievances, whether within companies or with TAFEP, are accessible to individuals with visual, hearing or physical disabilities. Without accessible grievance mechanisms, we risk leaving PwDs without recourse to address workplace fairness violations. Imagine constructing a state-of-the-art office building and declaring it open, yet failing to include a wheelchair ramp. How can we genuinely call the space "inclusive" or "equitable", if an entire group is excluded from ease of entrance? Reasonable accommodations, such as wheelchair ramps, are not just conveniences, they are fundamental enablers of participation and inclusion. Without them, WFL risks being an unfulfilled promise, falling short of its true purpose for our PwD community. As we advance WFL, let us ensure it becomes more than just a vision or a set of ideals. It must function as a practical, inclusive framework that truly works for everyone. Embracing reasonable accommodations for PwDs will be a testament to our nation's shared commitment to equity and inclusivity.”
“By reducing administrative barriers and improving access to information, agencies can encourage more companies to take advantage of these grants, fostering a greater willingness to make reasonable accommodations. For WFL to succeed, we must include education and training for hiring agents and managers. Awareness of what constitutes discrimination, at every stage of employment, is critical. I will share two examples where two hiring officers have, unknowingly, discriminated against PwDs. The first example, at the pre-employment stage, some deaf individuals have faced overt discrimination. For instance, one deaf applicant included a note in her CV requesting responses via email. After weeks without replies, she added a friend's phone number. When the hiring officer called the friend and learned the applicant was deaf, they responded, "In that case, we will delete her name from the list." As the role did not require hearing or speaking on the phone, this was a clear and unjust act of discrimination. Here is a second example: a neurodivergent individual shared that his manager explicitly marked him down during a performance appraisal because he requested clarifications and step-by-step guidance on tasks. The markdown was based on the performance criterion of "ability to work independently with minimal supervision". But requests for clarifications are common for neurodivergent individuals and should not be penalised. Managers and HR departments working with PwDs must be trained to reasonably adjust performance appraisal criteria, particularly regarding what "working independently" means for someone with disabilities. I urge MOM to incorporate training programmes, supported by disability Social Service Agencies (SSAs), as part of the WFL roll-out.”
“The Tripartite Guidelines on FWAs rolled out last December, are indeed a step forward. However, they raise an important question: if FWAs can be strongly encouraged, should we not go further and make FWAs a required reasonable accommodation for those with specific protected characteristics, particularly, PwDs or caregivers of vulnerable persons? For PwDs and their caregivers, remote or hybrid work arrangements is very much welcomed due to their unique needs. This also is profitable for our labour pool. Incorporating FWAs into the WFL as a legislated accommodation for PwDs and caregivers would send a clear and powerful message that inclusivity is not optional, but an essential principle. As we explore other potential accommodations that balance the needs of employers with those of employees, it is critical that we act with urgency and intent. Today's decisions will shape workplaces where those who need the most support are given the opportunity to thrive and where fairness is embedded in every aspect of our work culture. Second, the Open Door Programme grant scoped as legislated reasonable accommodation. Accommodations covered by grants under SG Enable's Open Door Programme should also be legislated as reasonable accommodations. The Open Door Programme supports employers by covering up to 90% of the costs for job redesign and staff training to accommodate PwDs. This significantly reduce the financial burden of inclusive hiring. However, many companies may find the application process daunting due to administrative challenges. To address this, I urge MOM and MSF to collaborate with SG Enable to simplify and streamline the application process.”
“Mr Speaker, during the past Committee of Supply debates, I highlighted that while employers might view reasonable accommodation as optional, it is a necessity for PwDs and caregivers of vulnerable individuals, whether children, PwDs or seniors. If workplace fairness is the goal, then reasonable accommodation is the bridge to achieving it for PWDs. It is the essential foundation that empowers them to access, sustain and thrive in their livelihoods, fostering equal opportunities not just in employment but also in career growth and development. Without this bridge, the promise of workplace fairness becomes a hollow ideal. In May 2024, MOM shared that the Tripartite Advisory on Reasonable Accommodation would be introduced alongside WFL. May I confirm if this advisory will indeed be released concurrently with Part 2 of WFL? This advisory holds great significance for those in the PwD community, who are keenly awaiting its guidance. This will serve as a critical framework for fostering inclusive workplaces. However, its importance also highlights why reasonable accommodation cannot remain separate from the discussion on workplace fairness. Consider this: if a PwD is deemed unsuitable for a role, solely because the employer did not provide a basic accommodation, such as screen-reading software, would that decision not amount to discrimination? Similarly, if a caregiver of a severely-disabled child is denied a job simply because they requested FWAs or hybrid meeting options, when the role can reasonably accommodate these requests, should that not also be seen as an unjust barrier under WFL? As first steps, I would like to propose two aspects of reasonable accommodation to be legislated as part of WFL. First, FWAs as a legislated reasonable accommodation.”
“To enhance its deterrent effect, may I propose for consideration, calibrating the bond amount to reflect rental fees or revoking the landlord's rental privileges for a set period of time if the issues persist. Additionally, requiring landlords and tenants to complete a brief programme on noise and neighbourly behaviour before the tenants move in would promote awareness and prevent future complaints. In closing, Mdm Deputy Speaker, while the amendments to the Community Disputes Resolution (Amendment) Bill are a step in the right direction, there is room for improvement. By enhancing mediation attendance enforceability, broadening CRU's regulatory scope, ensuring Government agency accountability and establishing effective deterrents for tenant-related nuisances, we can build a more robust framework for community harmony. I look forward to continued discussions and refinements that will help us create a peaceful and supportive community for all residents. Mdm Deputy Speaker, I am grateful for this Bill and I fully support this Bill.”
“Additionally, residents have raised complaints about neighbours throwing harmful substances or smoking in common areas. Will CRU eventually have the authority to manage these issues or could relevant bodies like HDB or NEA be empowered to investigate and take corrective actions? Addressing these frequent complaints would ensure CRU is adequately equipped to foster a safe and harmonious environment. Third, ensuring accountability in CMC settlements. The amendment permits parties to register their settlement agreements at CMC, giving them the same force as a CDRT order. This provides swifter legal recourse if a settlement is breached, which is a positive development. Some mediation agreements involve residents and Government agencies. In such instances, clarity is needed on the accountabilities by all parties. Would Government agencies represented also be legally bound to act as per mediation agreement? If so, officials representing Government agencies must be empowered to execute agreements made during mediation and held accountable to uphold them. This will reinforce trust in the mediation process and ensure all parties fulfill their commitments, avoiding breakdowns that affect residents' confidence in community resolutions. Fourth, addressing tenant-related noise nuisances. The Bill rightly includes provisions for engaging landlords earlier when tenant-related noise disturbances occur. This is a necessary step to prevent escalation of such issues. However, the proposed compliance bond for landlords may not be sufficient if the bond amount is too low in comparison to rental income. A minimal bond could weaken the incentive for landlords to take prompt action on tenant disturbances.”
“Mdm Deputy Speaker, the Community Disputes Resolution (Amendment) Bill and its focus on enhanced mediation directives address longstanding challenges in our dispute resolution mechanisms. Today, I will focus on four key areas within the Bill, including enforcement of mandatory mediation attendance, expanding the authority of CRU, ensuring accountability in settlements and addressing tenant-related noise nuisances. First, strengthening mediation attendance requirements. One critical challenge is the current voluntary attendance at the CMC, which allows residents to opt out of mediation. This often results in one party refusing to engage, preventing timely dispute resolution and undermining the effectiveness of our community mediation efforts. Granting agencies, like CRU and CMC, the power to mandate mediation attendance is an important step forward. However, we must also go further to ensure compliance with clear, enforceable measures beyond the existing $1,500 fine. If a party refuses to attend mediation and also avoids paying the fine, we need additional consequences, such as escalating penalties or legal actions. This will reinforce the seriousness of mediation directives and uphold their integrity. I urge the Government to strengthen these enforcement mechanisms. Second, expanding the scope of CRU. The Bill proposes regulatory powers for CRU to handle issues, like noise and hoarding. This is promising and we should consider expanding CRU's scope to address other prevalent issues in our communities. For instance, privacy concerns arise when residents report neighbours installing CCTVs directed toward their units. Currently, authorities lack the power to investigate or mandate removal of these cameras within private properties.”
“I just have one question here. Beyond already announced rail projects, when will LTA implement the previously announced West Coast extension, to create more rail resiliency in the West region, where there are fewer rail alternatives compared to the other regions of Singapore?”
“This led to a prolonged legal battle that lasted years and concluded in July 2024 with Proposition 22 being held in favour of platform operators. The process not only incurred significant legal costs for both employers and unions, but also delayed the much-needed protections for workers. Singapore's collaborative tripartite model, on the other hand, enables a smoother roll-out of protections, avoiding prolonged conflicts and ensuring that all stakeholders are engaged from the start. In conclusion, the Platform Workers Bill reflects Singapore's deep commitment to fairness, safety, and the well-being of our platform workers. It also stands as a testament to our unique tripartite approach, where Government, employers, and unions work in concert to create balanced and effective policies. This Bill not only protects the livelihoods of our workers but also secures their future, offering them the dignity and peace of mind they deserve. Mr Speaker, I strongly support this Bill.”
“It offers a structured approach to savings, provide financial security for those with young families and those who may not have the means or knowledge to save adequately on their own. Many riders who are also breadwinners often prioritise and are very willing to spend on their family's present needs, leaving little for their own retirement. This initiative is a step towards securing their future and gifting them peace of mind in their later years. I sincerely hope more workers above 30 will choose to opt into the programme, for their long-term financial well-being. The Platform Workers Bill stands out not only for its comprehensive safety and financial provisions but also for the collaborative process behind its creation. While other countries have taken steps to address platform worker rights, Singapore's Platform Workers Bill excels in its comprehensive approach to challenges such as retirement adequacy, work safety and insurance, and collective representation. This achievement is rooted in Singapore's distinctive approach to tripartism, which brings together the voices of workers, employers and the Government to shape policies. Thanks to the tireless efforts of our tripartite partners: MOM, the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) and the Singapore National Employers Federation (SNEF), we are able to introduce a Bill that safeguards platform workers in a balanced and efficient manner. In contrast, we can observe the challenges of a different approach in California. In 2020, the introduction of Assembly Bill 5, also known as AB5, which aimed to reclassify platform workers as employees, was swiftly challenged by platform companies through Proposition 22, a measure that exempted platform operators from AB5's requirements.”
“Implementing similar safeguards for delivery riders could significantly reduce the dangers they face on the road and ensure their safety as they carry out their work. Balancing safety with economic needs is also critical. I understand that some riders may be concerned about limits on their working hours due to the urgency of providing for their families and the uncertainty of securing jobs. Platform work does not always guarantee a consistent income as earnings depend on the availability of jobs in specific locations and time slots. Those who do not earn enough during their shift may feel compelled to extend their working hours to make up the gaps in income. However, those extra hours could just lead to a devastating loss of a breadwinner due to a preventable accident. To address both safety and economic stability, I am pleased that the Bill includes legally binding duties for platform operators, specifically an insertion into the WSH Act 2006, section 12A. This requires platform operators to take necessary measures to ensure the safety and health of their workers, including measures to prevent exposing them to hazards arising from the platform operator's arrangements and processes. The number of consecutive hours riders are allowed to work and how incentives are given are part of these arrangements. It is important that the Government and the industry continue to work closely to clarify how these provisions will be implemented, enforce them rigorously and review them regularly to safeguard our workers on the road. Beyond safety, the Bill also ensures financial security for our workers through mandatory savings via CPF. This is a very welcome development. From the delivery workers I have spoken with, there is genuine appreciation for this provision.”
“Mr Speaker, the Platform Workers Bill represents a crucial step in safeguarding the physical and financial well-being of our platform workers, especially our dedicated delivery riders, who will be the focus of my speech. Our delivery riders are not just workers. They are sons and daughters, fathers and mothers, and even grandparents. In my conversations with them, I have learned about their tireless efforts and the sacrifices they make. Many endure long hours on the road, at times, 12, 15, or even 18 hours a day, driven by a profound commitment to provide for their families and secure a better future for their children. One rider proudly shared with me that his two children are students in schools running the Integrated Programme, with one in junior college and the other in secondary school, both working hard to succeed. These children are not only their parents' motivating force and hope, but they are also the next generation of Singapore. It is thus our collective responsibility to safeguard the wellbeing of these hardworking individuals who are devoted to their families and play a pivotal role in building our nation. One of the most pressing concerns we must address is the safety of our delivery riders. The extended hours they work are not just gruelling, they pose significant risks on the road. Fatigue from long hours is a serious safety hazard that increases the likelihood of accidents. To mitigate this, it is essential for the Government and platform operators to work together to enhance safety guidelines. In many industries, shift workers are provided with mandatory breaks, shift limits and other safety protocols.”
“In Japan and Australia, companies that adopt innovative waste reduction methods, such as tech-enabled inventory management, receive substantial government support and recognition. Voluntary commitments by organisations across the food system, such as those seen in Australia and the United Kingdom (UK), with initiatives like the Courtauld Commitment, have created industry-wide movements to reduce food waste. These efforts are also strongly supported by the respective governments. The Good Samaritan Food Donation Bill represents a crucial advancement in the fight against food waste by safeguarding donors with good intentions. By defining liability and expanding protection to social enterprises and food rescue organisations, we enhance its impact across the broader community. Addressing food waste requires a collective effort from the entire nation and demands a widespread societal transformation. Beyond legislation, it is essential to implement programmes that educate consumers while requiring businesses to take proactive steps in reducing food wastage. I am confident that together, we can establish a more sustainable and responsible food system in Singapore. Mr Deputy Speaker, I support the Bill.”
“Additionally, educating consumers on what shelf-stable items are is equally vital, especially since overseas manufacturers may not use date labelling terms accurately. Items, such as soy sauce, uncooked rice or salt, can be kept almost indefinitely when properly stored, further supporting this effort. Rescued food should be embraced by everyone, not just those in need. While it is crucial to prioritise the needy in distributing donated food, it is equally important for the entire society to cultivate a mindset focused on reducing food waste for meaningful and collective effective efforts in Singapore. Second consideration: public-private partnerships are vital for scaling food waste reduction efforts. I call on the Government to encourage corporations and suppliers to reduce food waste through measures, such as well-designed tax incentives on surplus food donations and supporting companies that implement effective waste reduction strategies. Why explore tax incentives? While liability protection such as the Good Samaritan Food Donation Bill removes barriers to food donation, tax incentives directly encourage food donation. Food donors need to invest time and resources in packing, storing and especially in transporting surplus food. These food items would otherwise be discarded, often at no cost to them. Tax incentives can help offset these expenses for them. Having said that, to prevent potential misuse and ensure that the system encourage genuine efforts to reduce food waste, it is important to set sensible limits on the total amount of tax incentives available to each organisational food donor annually. Such tax incentives have already been adopted in the United States (US) and various European Union (EU) member states in efforts to minimise food waste.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, I am encouraged to witness the introduction of the Good Samaritan Food Donation Bill, which aims to incentivise donors to reduce food waste without fear of legal repercussions. May I share some points of clarification and considerations that need to be addressed regarding the Bill? Firstly, in conversation with a food rescue organisation we have worked with through the Telok Blangah Pulai Eco Club, it is important to note that while many well-meaning donor retailers or wholesalers contribute items that are past their "best before" dates but still in good condition, some companies use this as a means to dispose poor-quality items. Food rescue organisations, despite their best efforts, may not be able to thoroughly inspect every donated item. Therefore, it is crucial to clarify whether the Bill will also protect these intermediary groups and who would be held liable if unsafe food is distributed. Secondly, the term "donor" typically refers to those who give without receiving monetary incentives. However, some food rescue social enterprises may ask for donations or nominal fees to support sustainability efforts. It is important to determine if the Bill will cover these groups and establish requirements for their inclusion. Moving on to points for consideration, it is essential to complement the implementation of the Bill with public education. This broadens the acceptance of rescued foods and should inform individuals on the different date labels, such as the distinction between "expiry," "best before" and "use by" dates. Understanding the difference between safety-based versus quality-based date labels is crucial to reducing household food waste.”
“I am encouraged to learn that one of the recommendations put forth by the Tripartite Committee on Workplace Fairness involves the issuance of a Tripartite Advisory on providing reasonable accommodations to individuals with disabilities. It is imperative that individuals with disabilities are not unfairly excluded from job opportunities simply because they require reasonable accommodations. These accommodations are crucial for both employers and employees to achieve their full potential and drive business success. They can encompass a variety of adjustments, such as physical modifications, changes to job tasks, technological aids as well as fostering understanding and support from colleagues. While some employers may view reasonable accommodations as optional, we must recognise that for PwDs, these accommodations are essential for their livelihood. As the Tripartite Advisory on Reasonable Accommodations is currently in the form of guidance rather than a legal requirement, it is crucial to monitor its implementation and effectiveness among employers, as well as its impact on individuals with disabilities. May I request the MOM to provide updates on the roll-out of this advisory to employers, including details on how and when it will be implemented, as well as the metrics that will be used to evaluate its success? Additionally, I am curious to know if there are plans to eventually incorporate reasonable accommodations for PwDs into Workplace Fairness Legislation in the future. Ensuring Effectiveness of Work Injury Compensation Act (WICA) System”
“Chairman, as Singapore's population continues to age and birth rates decline, it has become increasingly important to support the physical and financial independence of our seniors in order to ease the economic burden on the workforce. The good news is that with better education and skillsets, we would expect to see seniors open to staying economically active for a longer time, whether for financial reasons or just to stay active, with 41% of the labour force now holding at least a university degree, a significant increase from just 27.6% in 2010. However, seniors who are not pressed financially may like to work part-time after retirement to balance leisure time and professional engagement for a healthier pace of life. Others would like to reduce work hours due to health reasons and supplement retirement income against rising costs. What plans are there to support older persons who are willing and able to contribute to work but with reduced hours? Will the upcoming Tripartite Guidelines on Flexible Work Arrangement Requests include considerations for older workers who require both reduced and flexible work hours due to age-related health issues? More Inclusive Workforce”
“Chairman, many caregivers seek employment to cover expenses for dependents, like individuals with disabilities or seniors, often needing jobs with FWAs due to caregiving demands. In exchange for greater flexibility in schedule, caregivers sometimes settle for low-paying roles that may not match their education levels or skills. The financial strain of caregiving can be great, especially if they have had to quit their jobs or reduce their working hours to be a caregiver. This problem is particularly pronounced where the caregivers are single. May I ask, what employment support will be made available to caregivers to PWDs and seniors? And for caregivers who are single, whether there is additional support for them? FWAs”
“Chairman, in my Budget speech, I highlighted the issue faced by persons with disabilities (PwDs) when encountering training providers who are either unwilling or not equipped to provide necessary accommodations. This often results in PwDs being turned away or not receiving the support required to fully engage in further education and training opportunities. These accommodations could range from providing screen reader-friendly course materials and websites for those with visual impairments, to adjusting assessment methods to cater to an individual's disabilities. Unfortunately, as the provision of reasonable accommodation is not yet a legal requirement in Singapore, PwDs have limited avenues for recourse in such situations. As Singapore continues to equip its workforce with the skills needed for an evolving economy, it is crucial that PwDs have equal access to skills upgrading opportunities to remain competitive. In light of this, what are the ways the Government can collaborate with continuing education and training (CET) centres to ensure that SkillsFuture courses eligible for the newly introduced SkillsFuture Level-Up Programme are accessible to PwDs, particularly those with visual impairments or neuro-diverse needs? This is to ensure that PwDs are not left behind in the upskilling process and that they have the necessary support to thrive in a competitive job market. Lifelong Learning for All Singaporeans”
“With the rise in media coverage of fluid and potentially divisive global issues, Singaporeans are engaging in discussions on foreign policy more actively than ever before. This growing trend not only reflects a heightened interest in global affairs but also underscores the importance of such conversations for a nation that is significantly influenced by international events. However, while this increased interest is positive, there is still room for improvement in how the Government communicates the underlying considerations of foreign policy to the public. Diplomacy and foreign policy are complex and multi-faceted with various conflicting perspectives. Every decision or statement made can have far-reaching consequences for Singapore's open economy. Therefore, it is crucial for MFA to regularly involve Singaporeans in discussions to foster a clearer understanding of the country's fundamental interests in foreign policy. A united and well-informed citizenry is essential for the success of our foreign policy endeavours. In light of this, I would like to inquire about MFA's plans to engage Singaporeans on foreign policy matters to enhance awareness of Singapore's core interests. MFA Engagement Strategies”
“Chairman, many Singaporeans are distressed by the humanitarian situation in Gaza. All sides should do their utmost to prioritise the safety of civilians and stop the attacks and destruction of civilian infrastructure. To protect their sovereignty and their peoples' livelihoods, countries have the right to self-defence. That said, all countries must respond proportionately and respect international law. At the UN, Singapore has consistently voted in favour of resolutions calling for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire. This is essential for the international community to provide humanitarian aid that the civilians of Gaza urgently need. The Government has also cooperated with like-minded partners to provide humanitarian assistance. It has worked with partners like the Singapore Red Cross and Mercy Relief to send humanitarian goods for Gaza on the RSAF's Multi-Role Tanker Transport to Al Arish, Egypt, in November 2023. Just last month, SAF deployed a medical team to treat injured civilians from Gaza on board a French Navy Ship. Given the continued crisis, what else can Singapore do to address the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict? Preserving Harmony, Maintaining Humanity”
“The recent developments in the Middle East and Europe serve as a stark reminder of the ongoing importance of Total Defence and its six pillars. The proliferation of fake news and disinformation through various media channels has expanded the battlefield to encompass not only physical borders but also the hearts and minds of individuals. There is an urgent need for the active implementation of Total Defence among our populace. Despite Singapore's prolonged period of peace, the concept of Total Defence may still feel distant to many Singaporeans. While it is taught in schools, its practical implications on daily life may not always be evident. As we commemorate the 40th anniversary of Total Defence this year, it presents an ideal opportunity for us, as a community, to come together and contemplate how each of us can contribute to Singapore's defence. How can MINDEF encourage conversations among Singaporeans, to explore ways to incorporate Total Defence into their daily lives, thereby fostering a more resilient society? Engaging Youth on Defence Issues”
“These hubs are tailored to meet the specific healthcare needs of the units in surrounding camps. I am encouraged to learn that the Health Hub offers an array of enhanced medical services, including dental, physiotherapy and mental well-being support, with unique features that enhance pandemic readiness. The introduction of telehealth services to the region's camps also represents a step towards more convenient healthcare options for our servicemen and women. Efforts to enhance the accessibility and quality of healthcare for our soldiers are crucial and must be sustained. May I ask MINDEF to share the plans for the remaining five healthcare hubs and how they will further improve the healthcare services available to our servicemen and women?”
“Defence serves as a pillar of societal stability, safeguarding our freedoms and way of life. However, its importance is often only truly appreciated in its absence, leading to the tendency to take the presence of strong defence for granted. Therefore, I would like to express my gratitude to our NSmen for their dedication to Singapore's national defence. The commitment of our NSmen to balancing personal, professional and NS responsibilities during their reservist years is truly commendable. Thank you for your silent yet steadfast protection of our shores. Over time, MINDEF has made efforts to simplify processes and lessen administrative burdens for NSmen. These initiatives include the automation of make-up pay claims and the digital distribution of NS Recognition benefits. In 2019, plans were announced for a centralised hub that would consolidate all NS-related services into one location to better cater to the needs of our NSmen. This development aims to provide a more user-friendly and convenient experience, eliminating the need for NSmen to visit multiple sites across Singapore and for services such as health screenings, annual fitness tests and equipment procurement. As it has been five years since the groundbreaking ceremony, can MINDEF provide an update on the progress of this facility? SAF's Healthcare Services Our servicemen and women are the foundation of our defence force, and it is imperative that we prioritise their well-being by ensuring they have easy access to the healthcare services and resources that they need. Last February marked the opening of the Kranji Regional Health Hub, the first of six regional health hubs aimed at providing comprehensive healthcare services to SAF camps in Singapore's north-western region.”
“Chairman, under current regulations, childcare leave ends when a child turns 12 – assuming they are independent by then. However, this overlooks parents of children with severe disabilities or rare disorders who are undergoing care regardless of age. The level of care for these children does not diminish and may even intensify as their condition progresses. As a result, many caregivers have appealed to their employers to use their personal medical leave instead; believing they would not need it for themselves due to their dedication to their child's well-being. I brought up this issue during last year's Budget Debate, if the Government would consider extending childcare leave for parents of children with severe disabilities past the age of 12? What alternatives are available for these parents in terms of childcare leave?”
“These guidelines should elucidate the available avenues for recourse for individuals facing discrimination. Presently, individuals have limited options for recourse, with the only available avenue being to appeal directly to MAS. However, the explanations provided by insurance companies in response to such appeals may be biased by their internal practices. To ensure a more impartial process, it is vital to institute an objective panel of third-party evaluators comprising of Government officials, industry representatives, medical professionals and disability experts to resolve disputes and foster a more equitable insurance environment. As we strive to raise the standards of equitable insurance coverage, I look forward to Singapore withdrawing its reservations on Article 25(e) of the UNCRPD in the near future. Inclusivity is more than a mere goal. It is a collective journey that we must undertake as a united Singapore. This journey serves as a poignant reminder of our shared vulnerability. Anyone can face disabilities, whether temporarily or permanently, due to genetic factors or traumatic experiences. We are all prone to illness and health challenges that may one day impede certain functions. These proposed initiatives are not solely focused on ensuring equal opportunities. They are aimed at nurturing a society where every individual, regardless of their abilities or background, can flourish and make meaningful contributions. Let us work together to establish an inclusive SkillsFuture ecosystem and guarantee equitable insurance coverage for all. With this in mind, Mr Speaker, I lend my full support to Budget 2024.”
“However, we aim to ensure that PwDs who possess the capability to do so are able to access the 29,000 courses available on the main SkillsFuture portal, provided that necessary accommodations are put in place. It is crucial that in our endeavours to empower PwDs through the Enabling Academy, we must strive to avoid unintentional segregation in their CET pursuits. While the Enabling Academy is a valuable complement to SkillsFuture programmes, particularly for disability types requiring significant course adjustments, an inclusive SkillsFuture ecosystem should promote an environment where both PwDs and individuals without disabilities can learn together. With the technical and financial support from SG Enable and other Government agencies, we can establish a comprehensive and inclusive SkillsFuture ecosystem. Mr Speaker, I would now like to address the crucial issue of ensuring fair consideration in insurance coverage for PwDs and individuals with autism. Earlier this month, several Members and I myself brought attention to the necessity of enhancing insurance coverage for individuals with mental health conditions. We underscored the difficulties that individuals encounter when attempting to secure insurance for physical health issues that are separate from their mental health history. PwDs and individuals with autism encounter similar obstacles when navigating the insurance landscape beyond their existing conditions. As MAS prepares to introduce guidelines for financial institutions to embrace fair and responsible practices towards customers in mid-2024, it is imperative that clear directives are established on how rejection, loading and exclusion criteria should be set for individuals with disabilities, autism and mental health disorders.”
“As content developers, they share the responsibility for ensuring its accessibility. The Institute of Adult Learning (IAL) offers programmes for adult educators to meet the qualification requirements to run SSG-funded certifiable courses. While Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles are mentioned in IAL’s diploma programmes, the current depth does not ensure proficiency in creating accessible course materials. By integrating UDL practices into course development and setting minimum accommodation requirements, educators can reduce the need for accommodations after. Fourth, accessible information on course and accommodations pre-enrolment. Training providers should provide course information and accommodations in accessible format before enrolling to help learners make informed choices and prepare for course demands. Implementing these interventions will take time. But the launch of the Level-Up Programme presents an immediate opportunity to integrate inclusivity into our CET sector. I propose for MOE’s consideration to require the relevant training providers, particularly those running courses that qualify for the Mid-Career Training Allowance, to work with the Enabling Academy on assessing reasonable accommodations for PwDs and where found reasonable, to make provisions. Doing so will underscore our commitment to PwDs in supporting their upskilling journey, on par with our support for those without disabilities. Once more, I must applaud the Enabling Academy for your outstanding accomplishment in achieving and offering more than 700 disability-friendly courses within a brief time period.”
“However, this is not a requirement in Singapore, despite having ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) in 2013. SSG, in collaboration with the Enabling Academy, can work with training providers and industry partners to determine what constitutes reasonable accommodation. This can include discussions on which industry courses to prioritise as well as provide the technical assistance for adaptations. In addition, clear communication and accessible recourse should be made available for PwDs when they encounter difficulties with training providers. I propose that we start with ATOs and CET centres offering long-form or industry-recognised courses. This ensures that PwDs have access to courses that directly support employment or advancement at work. Second, market technical assistance with the Capability Development Grant. We must raise awareness as well as the utilisation of SG Enable's Capability Development Grant among training providers. This grant provides funding for customisation courses for PwDs. Based on the SG Enable’s Annual Reports from 2017 to 2020, only an average of 24 out of close to 1,000 training providers do so each year. This data is not available in the Annual Reports of 2021 and 2022. Many training providers outside the disability sector may not be aware of or are familiar with the grant utilisation. Without this knowledge, the grant's effectiveness is limited. To address this, both the grant and SG Enable’s consultancy services should be promoted together to boost utilisation. Third, capability-building for inclusive CET design. We must better equip our adult educators with skills to create accessible course materials. Adult educators play a pivotal role in making learning accessible.”
“I am heartened by the collaborative efforts of the SkillsFuture team with disability advocacy organisations, like the Disabled People’s Association (DPA). However, despite the Government's robust backing for PwDs, obstacles still remain. Discussions and consultations with PwDs conducted by DPA have revealed that many PwDs encounter difficulties with CET providers who are unable to accommodate their specific needs, despite the PwDs being willing to provide guidance on how to do so. This often results in PwDs being turned away or not receiving the necessary support to fully engage in CET programmes. Those who have enrolled in SkillsFuture initiatives have also shared instances where instructors may not address their queries adequately, possibly due to a lack of knowledge and resources. For instance, visually impaired individuals have requested screen-reader friendly document formats or image descriptions for diagrams, while autistic individuals have expressed a need for more specific and direct instructions. We need to acknowledge the challenges that PwDs face in their CET journey. This should not be the experience of any individual in Singapore who seeks to enhance their skills and advance. To address these challenges, may I propose four key interventions? First, require reasonable accommodation for PwDs. In CET, reasonable accommodations refer to measures that enable PwDs to participate equally without imposing an undue burden on training providers. In Australia, where Singapore's Skills Qualification Framework is modeled after, their approved training organisations (ATOs) are legally required to provide reasonable accommodations for PwDs in teaching, learning and assessment.”
“Mr Speaker, I would like to begin by extending my thanks to Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong and his dedicated team for unveiling the comprehensive Budget 2024, aimed at alleviating cost-of-living concerns and promoting a more equitable and inclusive Singapore. In my address today, I will concentrate on two primary areas: one, establishing a comprehensive SkillsFuture ecosystem that is inclusive; and two, ensuring equitable insurance protection for persons with disabilities and individuals on the autism spectrum. Before I continue, may I declare that I lead a consultancy that provides selected short-form courses funded by SkillsFuture. The newly introduced SkillsFuture Level-Up Programme offers substantial assistance to mid-career individuals looking to transit into new industries while managing family commitments. Initiatives like the $4,000 top-up in SkillsFuture Credit, the extension of the Mid-Career Enhanced Subsidy and the introduction of the SkillsFuture Mid-Career Training Allowance highlight the Government's dedication to aiding all Singaporeans in upskilling, including PwDs. This aligns with the objectives of the 2030 Enabling Masterplan to raise the employment rate of working age PwDs from 30% to 40%. It is imperative that PwDs have equal access to CET programmes to acquire the essential skills needed to excel in today's job market. I applaud the Government for its substantial support towards our PwDs in their CET endeavors. Job-seeking PWDs registered with SG Enable receive additional course fee funding support of up to 95%. Moreover, the rapid expansion of the Enabling Academy to offer over 700 accessible courses within just two years of its inception is commendable.”
“Individuals then hesitate to seek treatment due to their limited annual leave and the risk of it being known that they are seeing a mental health professional. Some companies have implemented a 14-day well-being leave in place of the traditional medical leave. It allows staff to take leave for physical or mental illness for when their dependants require care or to take time-off for their own personal well-being, all without the need for medical certification. This benefits parents, caregivers and individuals across a broad spectrum. For individuals seeking mental health support, this also provides a level of privacy. I submit for consideration modifying the traditional medical leave system to recognise a broader range of interventions for mental health. This will meet the evolving needs of Singapore. Third, mental health check-ups in national health screening. As with the youths, mental health check-ups could be incorporated as part of the national health screening programme for adults or as part of workplace health screening. Such a check-up incorporated into our National Healthcare Plan will communicate the importance of mental wellness, encourage conversations and advocate for early help-seeking. Mr Speaker, renowned neuro-psychiatrist and expert on resilience, Dr Boris Cyrulnik states, "No child is doomed by their past. But if we abandon injured people, there will be no resilience". By reducing institutional barriers and increasing entry points to help-seeking, we will show up meaningfully for the individuals in need, raising the resilience of our people and society. With that, Mr Speaker, I support the Motion.”
“They were all submitted to no avail. These appeals only add mental load to their already mentally burdened state. Given ongoing examples of rejection, coupled by warnings from doctors and insurance brokers not to declare their illnesses, one's options are to conceal, skip treatment or go without insurance. There are private insurers that do insure those with mental illnesses. However, their premiums are often unaffordable for the masses. In Ms Vas' case, she finally found an insurer, at a premium of $8,000. Individuals recovering or have recovered from mental illness should not be penalised for boldly seeking help for their mental health. Yet, the discrimination against people recovering or have recovered from mental illness when obtaining insurance for physical health conditions can be daunting. May I propose for the Inter-Agency Taskforce on Mental Health and Well-being to take on this complex but necessary task to clarify with insurance companies when exclusions are discriminatory against people with mental illnesses and to also outline the recourse available for individuals facing the discrimination? Second, support workplace leave policies. Mental health clinics often operate during work hours and weekend slots get filled very quickly. This means when an individual needs to seek mental health support on a weekday, they would need to take leave from work. Under current MOM guidelines, paid outpatient sick leave requires employees to be certified unfit for work by a medical professional registered under the Medical or Dental Registration Act. Since only psychiatrists are licensed under the Medical Registration Act, those seeing psychologists, counsellors and mental health therapists will not qualify for paid medical leave.”