Tin Pei Ling
Singapore
“This is not about building a talent pipeline and reserve for the land, sea and air transport sectors, but also about helping Singaporeans seize more valuable opportunities. (In English): Mr Speaker, Singapore did not inherit our connectivity. We built it deliberately, chapter by chapter, and this House now holds the pen for the next one.”
“Thank you, Chairman. Two questions. One is that I hear that there will be a review of the COE system later part of this year. I would just like to ask if there is a specific timeline that we can look forward to. Second is on land transport overall. It is on the impact of ageing population and ageing infrastructure.”
“Leveraging frontier technologies – automation, advanced sensors, predictive analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) – will keep our infrastructure globally competitive. But we must deploy technology responsibly to augment productivity while managing workforce transitions and reskilling needs.”
“Many thanks to all. I beg leave to withdraw my amendment. [(proc text) Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. (proc text)] [(proc text) The sum of $3,109,174,200 for Head W ordered to stand part of the Main Estimates. (proc text)] [(proc text) The sum of $13,306,280,300 for Head W ordered to stand part of the Development Estimates. (proc text)]”
“Can the Ministry consider targeted measures, such as rental relief schemes, tenancy support for heritage and neighbourhood retailers, incentives for landlords to prioritise local tenants or co‑investment platforms that enable local businesses to secure long‑term premises?”
“Internationally, we could forge norms that prevent regulatory arbitrage and ensure cross‑border accountability. Hence, building on existing frameworks, what more will the Government do to strengthen Singapore's role in global AI governance, standards, certification, international coordination and capacity building, to preserve human agenc…”
The complete record
Every one of 781 lines we hold for Tin Pei Ling, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 12 of 16.
“Mdm Speaker, the constitutional amendment Bill that we begin debating on today needs to be seen in the context of strengthening our system and our country. From a Third-World country that suffered from a weak economy and racial strife in the 1960s to the First-World nation that we are so proud to declare as our home wherever we go today, it is our incorruptibility, meritocracy and multiracialism that saw us through. These values would be nothing but mere words if we only expounded them in forums or paper, but it was through Singaporeans' support, continuous social improvements and conscientious system and policy design that we could truly embrace them. Therefore, any amendment must be made in the spirit of further entrenching our values of incorruptibility, meritocracy and multiracialism within Singapore, so that we can continue to ensure continued peace and progress for our nation. When studying the amendments set out in this Bill, there are two key components that stand out to me and which I would like to talk about in this debate. Firstly, Elected Presidency is necessary. We had introduced in 1991 an Elected Presidency with reserve powers to safeguard our Reserves. However, there have been calls to revert the Presidential system to the appointed system from the current elected one. Some are concerned about Singapore becoming inevitably fragmented as segments of the population take sides. Some were concerned that candidates will make unrealistic but populist promises that are not provided for in the Constitution and, therefore, cast ridicule on the system.”
“Madam, I thank the Minister for the reply. I have clarifications to make. May I clarify what would be the frequency for the additional checks that the Minister has articulated earlier that will be done by HDB? Secondly, for older blocks, there will be greater priority as well as greater frequency in terms of the checks, given that since they are older, I would naturally assume that they will also suffer the effects of ageing as well.”
“First of all, because part of MacPherson was part of the first general cluster, I would like to also thank MOH, NEA, the Town Councils, pest control workers and grassroots leaders for their relentless efforts in the anti-Mozzie and anti-Zika efforts. Thank you. I have got a few questions. First of all, I would like to ask if Zika is now considered endemic in Singapore and if a full eradication is even possible. Second, I note that WHO has praised Singapore and that we have also complied with the guidelines, in terms of how we can support and advise pregnant women in Singapore, I am wondering if more help can be given to them. Until there is greater research and clarity in whether the local strain of Zika will cause more or less damage, in terms of pregnant women and the foetuses, I believe pregnant women will continue to be worried throughout the months of pregnancy. So, would regular tests be made available to all pregnant women during the pregnancy? And for those who have exhibited symptoms and tested positive, would MOH subsidise the expected increase in cost, given the anticipated increase in scans and other follow-ups needed to ensure the well-being of the foetuses? Thirdly, is the current testing capacity enough to deal with the demand in case of a national outbreak again – hopefully not – and whether there is a need to increase the capacity for testing? Finally, will there be funds specially set aside to conduct Zika research? This is especially so, given that mosquitoes are considered endemic in the tropical countries like ours?”
“Let me clarify. I asked the engineering team and, from what I was told, generally speaking, the lift replacement period is about 15 years, plus or minus. So, maybe I should rephrase that. Based on what I have come to understand, it is a shorter period of an average of about 15 years.”
“Madam, I have four supplementary questions for the Minister. Firstly, I understand that quality checks cannot be 100% and I am also glad that the Ministry is looking into enhancing the competency. May I ask whether the Ministry will consider requiring the lift maintenance workers and installation workers to be certified, so that there is at least a basic quality assurance? Secondly, I know of some new lifts that consistently fail to meet the minimum breakdown rate threshold and, maybe over consecutive months. So, may I ask, currently, during the DLP, how Page: 20 much are the liquidated damages for poor lift maintenance for these newly-installed lifts? Thirdly, under what circumstances would the lift company be barred from the next tender, given what I have just shared? Lastly, I would like to ask the Minister again whether the Ministry will consider shortening the replacement period from 28 years to, perhaps, a period that is closer to the private sector's benchmark of 15 years.”
“As such, could PMO study the feasibility of such an idea and, at the same time, could PMO also share what other solutions it is considering? Total Fertility Rate”
“Therefore, I would like to ask if we could have a rethink about how we want to help young working parents in this aspect. Can we consider alternatives other than care centres and family support which not everyone has? For example, and I have mentioned this before, could we organise and tap on "informal sources of labour", such as the nannies and volunteers within the community, to supplement infant and childcare centres? These can be experienced women or we know them as "aunties" or trained part-time caregivers who want to take care of infants and children and earn an income at the same time. These potential caregivers may be keen but have not been able to find the families who need them. The Government can help match demand with supply by creating an online directory to facilitate this. Interested parents who cannot secure a placement at the infant care or childcare centre can look to this platform for potential caregivers within the neighbourhood. Basic profiles and credentials of these caregivers can be published in the directory. Interested caregivers can also be offered a refresher course customised to match their educational background. Given their experience, the course need not be over an extended period and, therefore, their "time-to-market" would be shorter. Their completion of such a course or other comparable certification, assuming they attended institutional training, can be published in the directory as part of their credentials. Parents can browse through the directory on their own and decide for themselves who they want to engage. They can then negotiate the price privately with the caregivers listed. In essence, the directory serves as just a platform for demand to find supply.”
“Yes, Madam. Singaporeans today are sophisticated, well-educated and have diverse and ambitious aspirations. Many look forward to enjoying a good family life while building their careers as well. These are worthy of our support and we must do what we can to support them. Some young Singaporeans find themselves struggling to balance their roles as a responsible parent and a performing employee, often compromising one for the other. However, parenthood and career-building need not be mutually exclusive. Beyond Government initiatives, we need a whole-of-society movement to secure a win-win outcome. We, as a society, need to celebrate marriage and parenthood. At the same time, the culture and structure at the workplaces need to also complement such efforts. For instance, employers should promote fairer appraisal systems that do not mark down mothers or fathers because they had to be taken out of action for a few months or if they took childcare leave. Focus the appraisals on outcomes and the quality of work product. We should also continue to promote flexi-work: incentivise the use of technology to reduce the need for face time so as to enable working parents to work just as effectively out of the office. Given the challenges we face and the aspirations of young Singaporeans, could PMO share what is its "game plan" in encouraging marriage and parenthood amongst Singaporeans, while not compromising on their pursuit of career aspirations? Creative Approach to Infant Care and Childcare And speaking of support for young parents, we have always been talking about infant care and childcare centres, but we know that supply is still chasing demand. Manpower in this area has also been tight and will continue to be challenging.”
“Thank you, I will. So, may I ask the Ministry what is it going to do to increase awareness towards Zika?”
“Madam, I have four clarifications. The first one, just now, Senior Minister of State Amy Khor had mentioned and provided some explanation about the community networks for seniors. I would like to register my very strong interest to have it piloted in MacPherson and, if yes – please say yes – I hope, I would like to ask if there is any room for the local grassroots to be involved in the set up so that we can provide the local context to customise the scope of work for the community network. At the same time, I am just wondering if the Ministry will also consider establishing something like an eldercare relationship management system so that there is a more systematic way for the different stakeholders to integrate our efforts and to synchronise in how we can reach and better care for our elderly. Second, I would like to ask whether there is any plan to leverage more on technology to enable ageing-in-place so that our elders in their retirement can live in a more independent manner. The third query is on the Trim and Fit (TAF) programme. I understand that, in the past, in the schools, there is the TAF programme to encourage the young to be healthier. So, just wondering why this has been discontinued and what is the reason for that. Lastly, on Zika, just yesterday, there was news from the US that it is worse than it has been previously thought. It affects the entire pregnancy period and so this is quite worrying. I would like to ask what are the measures in place to better protect pregnant women in Singapore. Also, I fear that awareness about Zika in Singapore is still very much lagging, especially compared to dengue.”
“Madam, the rise in dengue cases in recent years and the spread of Zika in other parts of the world are worrying. While the Government is proactively working to prevent mosquito breeding, it is not foolproof. Singapore is an international hub. The risk of an infection brought in by an unsuspecting foreign carrier is always present. We, therefore, need to look at other prevention methods. Could the Ministry share whether there are plans to integrate dengue vaccination with other dengue control and healthcare strategies in Singapore? Could the Ministry also share whether it will invest in research into Zika, its treatment and vaccination?”
“Madam, childhood obesity has been described by WHO as "one of the most serious public health challenges of the 21st century". It is also on the rise in Singapore. A major concern is that obese children are more at risk of suffering from chronic diseases and stroke later on in life. However, this can be prevented if intervention is done right and early. We must keep our young healthy and fit, for their own sake and for the sake of a healthy Singapore. Hence, what is the MOH's plan to address childhood obesity? What is the Ministry's plan also in promoting and supporting our young to stay healthy? Mental Resilience and Well-being of Youths”
“Two, tracking and monitoring our Singaporean women's health statistics which can be shared openly. I hope that this can be a motivational element for our ladies to see the positive changes. Thirdly, more education and outreach for our ladies with diabetes since we are all on a war path against diabetes. The prevalence is high and even higher amongst some ethnic groups. As mentioned, our women play important roles and we do not want them to be prematurely debilitated by the complications of diabetes. The other group to assist will be our women with gestational diabetes and a proportion of them, we know, do go on to become pre-diabetic or overt diabetic. Therefore, I think a proactive approach to handle this will be necessary.”
“Madam, women play multiple roles at home, at work and in the community. It is, therefore, easy for women to neglect their own health. Diabetes is a common chronic disease and it is only becoming more common. It adversely affects a patient's life and can lead to complications. Being a chronic disease, the long-term medical financial burden can be high, too. Hence, we need to actively help women, especially pregnant women, prevent diabetes. This is because many children of mothers who had gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) while pregnant are at higher risk of suffering obesity and diabetes later on in life. Studies have been reinforcing this finding. Therefore, whether it is for the well-being of women or our young, we must step up our efforts to actively manage and prevent diabetes. In this regard, I would like to ask what is the Ministry's plan in promoting better women health and preventing diabetes, especially gestational diabetes, in women. Women's Health Assoc Prof Fatimah Lateef: Madam, women play a crucial role in the health of our Singaporean families. They are usually the central figure in families, taking charge of the cooking, health appointments, caregiving activities and childbearing as well. It is thus important to ensure our women stay healthy and happy. They are also the gender with the longer lifespan, which means they may also face the brunt of the complications of chronic illnesses. For those who are working, there will be, of course, added responsibilities to prioritise their commitments. Can I ask MOH what is the role of the Women's Health Advisory Committee and also on the following issues which, hopefully, can be reviewed? First, a more integrated package for women's health screening at subsidised rates and more publicity as well.”
“Madam with an ageing population, demand for manpower in the ILTC sector will increase. However, the labour market is already tight across all industries and sectors. There is stiff competition for workers and control over foreign manpower will only get tighter. Moreover, even as we look to leverage technology more, the human touch cannot be replaced in delivering quality care. Therefore, I would like to ask, firstly, what is the Ministry's plan in tackling the manpower challenges in the ILTC sector. Secondly, how has the response been in terms of attracting mid-career professionals? How does the Ministry intend to attract more? Would scholarships with bonds be helpful? Thirdly, will the Ministry consider requiring and assisting ILTC providers to redesign their processes and systems where necessary, so that more older or retired workers can join to supplement the manpower needs?”
“Madam, with an ageing population, demand for eldercare services and facilities will increase as well. Also, the incidence of dementia will rise, too, making care for our elderly even more challenging as this requires certain care specialisation and adjustments in the communities. Hence, could the Ministry share the projected demand for eldercare services and facilities, such as day rehabilitation centres, dementia day care centres and home-care? What is the Ministry's plan in meeting this demand? What are the constraints or challenges anticipated, if any? Also, are there lessons that we can draw from countries more experienced in caring for the aged? For instance, Japan is the world's fastest ageing society and it was said that the "epidemic of dementia" had already arrived. Given that it had to address this challenge much earlier, what can we learn from Japan about the needs of our old, especially those with dementia, and what can we do to address these needs? Hospice Care”
“MacPherson, for instance, has a Community Mental Health Programme supported by AIC, IMH and the South East Community Development Council since 2012. There has been some positive feedback. At the very least, amongst the volunteers and staff who have to frequently face residents, there is greater awareness of the signs and symptoms which aid early detection, greater appreciation of the challenges people with mental health issues face and greater sensitivity in how to engage them. I am wondering if there are plans to roll this out more extensively to more communities. Mental Health”
“Madam, I have been speaking up on mental healthcare issues in this Parliament for many years now. And I would say that Singapore has made progress in mental healthcare over the years; I have seen it. There is greater awareness, better intervention and more support. I would also say that few, if any, in our society would dispute the importance of ensuring mental wellness. However, there is still much that we can do. One critical obstacle to effective mental healthcare is the stigma faced by sufferers. Stigma may be perpetuated by the lack of understanding and media portrayal, but also, by real day-to-day problems that are left unsolved. I have raised examples about this in my speech last year, so I will not touch on it again this year. Together, these threaten to deepen the prejudices that people have of those suffering from mental health issues. The animosity, in turn, makes it more difficult for those suffering from these conditions or even their family members to consider the issue and seek professional help. Therefore, I would like to ask the Minister, looking ahead, what does the Ministry plan to do to de-stigmatise mental health? Meanwhile, efforts to strengthen community mental healthcare must not stop, so that those who need care will continue to get the care they need. Hence, I would also like to ask: one, whether there is any update on the Community Mental Health Masterplan; two, how are patients who have "graduated" from IMH reintegrated back into the community and workplace; and third, and lastly, some communities have implemented networks involving voluntary welfare organisations (VWOs), Government agencies and grassroots leaders.”
“Perhaps, this initiative can be akin to the Pioneer Generation Ambassador (PGA) programme in which volunteers are empowered through proper training and given a modest honorarium. Some of the PGAs in my constituency are Pioneers themselves and they take great pride in their work as ambassadors. Thirdly, can the Community Networks for Seniors help to simplify the process of delivering assistance and care to our elderly, so that the elderly only need to approach one touch point? The coordinating nature of the Community Networks for Seniors can also ensure that resources and support are fairly distributed to all seniors.”
“Madam, there is a concerted push for active ageing amongst our seniors in Singapore. One critical aspect that we must not neglect is the health of our seniors. Without health, our seniors cannot be active and lead a meaningful life. We must also ensure that seniors do not think that active living is only for the young and fit. That would undermine this important exercise. Therefore, I would like to ask the Minister to share and update what is his plan in promoting and supporting seniors to keep healthy. Community Networks for Seniors I am heartened by the slew of pro-elderly measures introduced over the past years. These are needed to enable a graceful and meaningful retirement for all Singaporeans. But to achieve a truly caring society, we cannot rely only on the Government or a few charitable organisations. Every one of us has to do our part. I see the Community Networks for Seniors being critical in this aspect, as they have the potential to ensure our seniors continue to be plugged in to social and support networks. It also ensures that the human touch will not be lost as we work towards more efficient eldercare and as we embrace greater use of technology. I would like to ask the Ministry, firstly, how does the Ministry see the Community Networks for Seniors fit into the Action Plan for Successful Ageing? Secondly, does the Ministry see scope within this initiative for the more abled seniors to be recruited to reach out to and help other seniors? I believe this is a very meaningful way of engaging seniors who are fit and keen to do something constructive in their retirement. This keeps them active. Moreover, seniors can also relate to seniors better, as they may share common challenges and language.”
“Currently, there is a wide range of income criteria applied to public service applications from different agencies, ranging from financial assistance to public housing to foreign spouse immigration. The variation can be in the form of gross versus nett, aggregated versus per capita and varying qualifying income ceilings for different but possibly similar schemes. This is confusing. Hence, could the Government consider applying net per capita income as the criterion across the board? This is a fairer assessment of a household's true earning and spending power. Also, could the same income criterion be imposed on applications involving a similar group of beneficiaries, even if the administering agencies differ? Finally, if not already, would the MSF consider taking the lead in a whole-of-Government income criteria review? Financial Counselling for Families”
“It is not a normal bank account which parents can frivolously tap on. Hence, if it is meant to benefit the child, why not allow children of unwed mothers to enjoy it as well? First, it encourages the mother to save money for the child. Second, it allows the child to also enjoy the First Step Grant of $3,000. We should prevent an unnecessary widening of the gap between Singaporean children just because of their parents' marital status. Lastly, ensure that children of divorced or unwed parents are included in the KidSTART programme. Given their relative disadvantageous start in life, I sincerely hope that KidSTART will help equalise the learning, developmental and health support these children can receive from the state. Single Parents and Child Benefits”
“Madam, I am heartened by the continued investment in the children of Singapore. We must continue to give all our young a good and more equalised start in life. Because by doing so, we are also making sure that the future sons and daughters of Singapore start on a good footing. In Singapore, while all children are precious and should enjoy equal opportunities, some are still "more equal than others". I feel very much for one group of children and they would be children of single parents, mainly unwed mothers. Page: 85 Firstly, children are innocent and, since they have been given life, we must cherish and nurture them. Give them opportunities and help them blossom into responsible and capable citizens of Singapore and of the world. Hence, we must focus our policies and efforts on their well-being. Secondly, having to grow up in single-parent households would mean that they can only rely on the resources of one parent, instead of two. This situation is exacerbated if the responsible parent is of lower income. Therefore, I hope the Ministry will consider the following. Firstly, reaffirm that every Singaporean child is a precious member of our society. Secondly, grant the full period of maternity leave to unwed mothers, up from the current period of eight weeks. This move is to allow the mother to have sufficient time to bond with the newborn. The child, from the point of birth, was already disadvantaged, having only one parent to rely on. It is all the more important for them to have enough time to develop the emotional attachment essential for a stable mother-child relationship. Thirdly, allow the child to benefit from the CDA. This was meant to be a special savings account for children's healthcare and educational expenses.”
“Madam, I am heartened that the Government is working hard at increasing the supply of quality infant care and childcare centres, so that young working parents can focus on their careers with less to worry about at home. But I am concerned about the manpower adequacy in these centres. In his parliamentary reply earlier this year, the Minister shared that a projected number of 1,500 more early childhood personnel over the next two to three years is needed to meet the demand. This is a significant number. I am also aware that the Ministry has expanded student intakes, introduced Professional Conversion Programmes and enhanced career progression opportunities in a bid to attract and retain early childhood educators. I would like to ask the Minister. Firstly, with the measures and programmes in place, as shared, are we on track to meeting this projected demand? Second, what is the Ministry's contingency plan if the manpower supply still falls short in two to three years' time, bearing in mind that we are near full employment and there is a manpower shortage across all sectors? And, lastly, would the Ministry consider complementary measures, such as drawing in retired teachers, not necessarily retired preschool teachers, or "aunties" who do not have the papers but are experienced enough to help at the centres, as an interim supply-side solution; or work with the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) to promote flexi-work that will, as part of the demand-side solution, enable mothers, fathers and grandparents to have more time to care for their children? Investment in Childcare Sector”
“Madam, we are keenly aware of the scarcity of land in Singapore. Yet, we have to provide space for the increasing and much-needed social programmes and services. I have received many such appeals. Typically, whenever we need more space, we boringly look to void decks and vacant lands. Yet, we simply do not have enough space to do so. I believe this challenge is not unique to MacPherson alone. Faced with this reality, I wonder if we could be more creative and build above the canals? By doing so, we can redesign the concept of space. We will also bridge communities on both sides of the canal and the new space created can be used for eldercare, childcare or for equally meaningful social purposes. With the canal and water flowing through, beneficiaries and residents can learn about water conservation, the surrounding ecosystem, reclamation of drain and, perhaps, even hydro-power. We will also be supporting the "A" in the "ABC", as the activities above and around the canal increase. One can perhaps draw inspiration from the Lien Foundation project titled "A Different Class: Pre-school Spaces Redefined". Therefore, I would like to ask the Minister if MEWR will favourably consider such an endeavour for constituencies with canals, such as MacPherson.”
“Also, the Government could perhaps emulate what it is already currently doing with the industry transformation, and that is to adopt a more targeted approach. For example, could the Government refine the current Work-Life Grant to encourage employers to tap on technology more so that face-time at work is less necessary? In conclusion, I concur with the overall direction and the themes of this year's Budget. We cannot have everything in one year's, Budget but I have confidence that over a few Budgets, much can be achieved. And with that, I support the Motion.”
“I hope that the Finance Minister can help to shed some light and share what was the policy thinking behind this move. So, if I may boldly submit the following questions. Firstly, what was the rationale for making such a move at this point in time? Surely, the Government had known that the people affected are mostly working mothers. Would the Minister help to share the thought process and the options considered? Secondly, I believe everyone is for a progressive tax system. But I wonder if the gain from this move to make the tax system more progressive is worth the tangible and intangible costs inflicted on these working mothers. Lastly, could the Government have increased revenues via other means that may encourage healthier lifestyles and behaviours, for instance? As I look forward to my queries being addressed and the policy insights being shared, I would like to raise and reinforce two suggestions, with the hope of alleviating the challenges faced by working parents, especially working mothers. Firstly, allow fathers to share more of the maternity leave. This will signal the need for a more equal sharing of parenting responsibilities. It will also mitigate the perception that mothers are a liability at work. Secondly, continue to promote flexi-work but not just for mothers. This can enable fathers or even grandparents to enjoy greater flexibility at work and hence, spend more quality time to help care for the children. The family can then work out an optimal schedule amongst themselves. Initiatives to encourage employers to adopt flexi-work arrangements have already been in place for some time. But I think it is worth pushing it further and reinforcing the message more frequently.”
“It is already challenging for women to succeed in corporate life, given that women are often the minority in the boardrooms and within senior ranks. With children, they have to perform the additional juggling act of being a responsible mother and a performing employee. So, it is extremely challenging for working mothers, a reality that can also be off-putting for young women who are still unsure if they should have children. In response, the Government had introduced a variety of measures to encourage childbirth and support working mothers. These are not new points. But I think there is one part of this year's Budget that risks becoming a disincentive. The personal income tax relief cap of $80,000 almost only hits working mothers, specifically those from mid-management and higher. Quite a few of the working mothers who are affected have reached out to me to express their unhappiness. They feel aggrieved not so much because of the reduction in disposable income, but more for the signal conveyed through this move. Rightly or wrongly, these working mothers feel singled out because their male contemporaries are generally unaffected by this move. Those who had enjoyed the working mother relief now feel penalised. Some wonder if the Government is asking them to have fewer children. Some wonder if it is really worthwhile to continue working hard to advance in their careers. Some wonder if this signifies that senior job roles are not meant for mothers or that mothers should not have higher career aspirations. Sir, I have no doubt about the need for a progressive, equitable and sustainable system, especially with the anticipated rise in social spending. But I think there are strong emotions evoked with this move and there is a need for some airing.”
“This is progressive and we must continue to do so. However, there are still some challenges that we must solve. One, childcare supply is still chasing demand. The Government is very actively working on this area but there is still some way to go. Can we consider alternatives other than care centres and familial support, which not everyone has? For example, organise and tap on "informal sources of labour", such as nannies and volunteers within the community to supplement infant care and childcare centres. There are many experienced women, or we know them as "aunties", or trained part-time caregivers who want to take care of infants and children and earn an income at the same time. The Government can help match demand with supply by creating an online directory to facilitate this. Interested parents who cannot secure a placement at the infant care or childcare centre can look to this platform for potential caregivers within the neighbourhood. Basic profile and credentials of these caregivers can be published in the directory. Parents and caregivers can then negotiate the price privately. In essence, whatever the format is, make this additional option more easily available for parents to consider. Two, we should continue to support working mothers and not discourage them. Some working mothers, who are PMEs in MNCs, shared with me that whenever a woman becomes pregnant, her career progression or promotion can get held back for one year. While they understand that the firms have to fairly reward others who inevitably have to step in to cover their duties during the downtime following birth, the opportunity costs are considerable.”
“There should be a central coordinating body within the respective communities for optimal manpower deployment – a function that perhaps the Community Networks for Seniors can assume. (In English): Next, I would like to touch on support for our young and families. I am heartened by the continued investment in the children of Singapore. We must continue to give our young a good and more equalised start in life. The First Step Grant is another step in this direction, given that some 5% of parents cannot even afford to deposit a cent in their children's Child Development Account (CDA). Hence, this grant ensures that any Singaporean child will have a minimum of $3,000 in their CDA from the moment they are born. Earlier on, hon Member, Ms Kuik Shiao-Yin, made the impassionate call for this to be given to all kids, regardless of the marital status of the parents. And I feel very touched by her impassionate call and I would also like to reinforce that call. KidSTART too is a step in the right direction. This longer-term and more holistic approach towards children of less privileged backgrounds is welcomed. I hope it will also focus on children from vulnerable backgrounds, such as single parent or very complex family situations. At the end, by giving the children of Singapore a good and more equalised start, it is really making sure that the future of Singapore also starts on a better footing. Over the years, it is also very heartening that the Government is determined to support families in Singapore and has implemented measures to help young Singaporeans achieve both parenthood and career aspirations, reducing their need to make trade-offs. Women have also been incentivised and encouraged to stay employed, even after being mothers.”
“Firstly, continue to invest in technological research targeted at eldercare and expedite the implementation of tested solutions that can enable our elderly, especially elderly with physical challenges and little familial support, to live independently at home. For example, build intelligent homes that can detect anomalies so that designated neighbours or Social Service Officers (SSO) can be alerted to intervene and help in a timely manner; make use of assistive technologies, controlled by speech or eye movements or mind, to enable a bedridden elderly to move around at home and execute daily living activities; make available an integrated digital platform with schedule optimising capabilities that allows the elderly to request for home care or any other social services or support in the comfort of their own homes without having to worry about what numbers to dial or which organisations have or do not have the services they need. As we move towards a "Smart Nation", this has to be given priority. The Government should also take the lead in this area. Secondly, actively recruit volunteers and aggressively promote the Business and IPC Partnership Scheme. Given the high demand for services and tight labour situation across all sectors, I doubt there will be enough workers to do what is needed. We have to review our manpower model more creatively. In my opinion, the way ahead will be that more Singaporeans, young and old, have to take on more responsibilities in the community – we need everyone to play a part anyway to make a caring society possible. We need to recruit more Singaporeans to volunteer to do so. But we also need to make sure that jobs are meaningful and the "job scopes" are better defined.”
“It can also help us achieve the vision of "ageing in place". I see this initiative as fulfilling two objectives. Firstly, I believe it can simplify the process of delivering assistance and care to our elderly and ensure that resources and support are fairly distributed to all seniors. Currently, the elderly are often confused by the myriad of social and healthcare schemes offered at the national and local levels. For example, they cannot master the differences between the Community Health Assist Scheme (CHAS) and outpatient subsidies, the uses of Medisave, MediShield Life and Medifund, and so on. Some are automatically administered, whilst some require application. Also, there is a tendency for well-intentioned organisations and volunteers to focus on rental blocks. This is necessary and has to continue because the elderly living in these blocks are genuinely more vulnerable. But we also know that vulnerable elderly do not reside exclusively in rental blocks. Moreover, even the more abled elderly need to be included socially, live a fulfilling life and have opportunities to continue to contribute. Secondly, as the number of lonely or single elderly increases, we must find a way to enable independent living. We can leverage on technologies to enable our elderly to live safely and independently at home, but whilst doing so, let us also make sure that the human touch is not inadvertently lost. We must prevent the elderly from dropping out of their social networks. Hence, I see this Community Networks for Seniors as a good way of putting that human touch back into their lives. In light of challenges and expected needs in caring for an ageing population, I would like to make two suggestions.”
“Despite limited resources and manpower, the demand for social programmes continues to rise and hence, effective partnerships are needed to ensure a more optimal application of resources. But we also need to rethink how we offer care for the more vulnerable, especially our elderly and our young. We need to innovate – whether it is through leveraging technology or changing the way we care for our vulnerable. Allow me to begin with the care for our elderly first and in Mandarin. (In Mandarin): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Caring for our elderly is important for building our society. Firstly, we have a rapidly ageing population. We need to gear ourselves to enable a graceful and meaningful retirement for all Singaporeans. Also, we need to recognise that our elderly can be an asset and not a liability. We should harness their wisdom and strengths to help Singapore grow economically and socially. Secondly, nobody wants to age in a cold and isolated environment where nobody cares. Hence, we need to put in place the infrastructure and programmes as early as possible, because these take time to take effect and take root. We are setting the tone and example for our younger generations and our decisions today will determine the values that will guide our society in the future. I am heartened by the slew of pro-elderly measures introduced over the past years. But to achieve a truly caring society, we cannot solely rely on the Government or a few charitable organisations. Every one of us has to do our part. I am therefore excited by the announcement of piloting Community Networks for Seniors. This is not exactly an innovation in terms of how we care for our elderly, though it is different from the traditional approach of family-based or institutional-based eldercare.”
“If I may offer some humble suggestions to the chorus of recommendations from Members of this House. Firstly, the Government must continue to emphasise the importance of adaptation and the need for lifelong learning. It is already done but such emphasis must continue throughout the year and over several Budgets. Anchor this belief of adaptation and lifelong learning in the conscious and subconscious minds, so that it becomes our way of life. Second, as with any transformation, there will be sacrifices and pain. There will be inertia. While businesses should ideally learn to thrive on their own with minimal Government intervention, I fear the reality now is that businesses are so used to Government support that a strong initial push is necessary before the transformation can take on its own momentum. Hence, the Government has to facilitate this as much as possible. There are many good schemes introduced. But as a next step, it is important to help SMEs benefit fully from these schemes and realise that it is achievable. Nobody will bother trying if they think these are too difficult or impossible to achieve. Hence, helping SMEs to make quick wins when they enrol in the schemes would help to make the bitter pill more "palatable" for the SMEs. Partnering trade associations is a good move and these associations can not only help to coordinate industry-wide changes but also multiply the outreach. For example, they can help to actively share the quick wins and successful examples to motivate others to push on. Now that we have begun our journey to transform, there is no turning back. Therefore, we have to give it our best shot. The Budget's emphasis on innovation and partnership is correct and timely, and these should apply to the social sector as well.”
“Sir, thank you for the chance to speak and I would like to thank Finance Minister for delivering a strategic and progressive Budget that has its eyes firmly set on the future as well as not forgetting the needs of the day. Sir, Budget 2016, otherwise known as Budget SG51, is an important one as it sets the direction and foundation from which we strive towards a successful SG100. Listening to Finance Minister's Budget Statement, three things came to mind. Firstly, that next phase of growth has to be driven by innovation vis-à-vis manpower growth. Second, transformation will be extremely uncomfortable but without it, we cannot metamorphosise into the figurative beautiful "butterfly". And third, partnership is necessary to effectively effect economic and social change. These are relevant and much needed in today's context and I sincerely hope that the measures announced in the Budget will succeed, because this is an important first step towards Singapore's future. Building on, I would like to offer my thoughts and humble suggestions on what else I believe we should consider as well. I am supportive of the direction taken and measures introduced to catalyse our economic transformation. I also appreciate the measures aimed at strengthening our own capabilities so that we will not, as much as possible, be at the mercy of external elements such as foreign manpower. Much of our past growth was dependent on manpower growth, which we logically know cannot be sustainable, given our limited land area. Therefore, innovation is key. The schemes in this Budget are clearly aimed at supporting innovation, with a focus on technology, and I look forward to the positive changes with great hope and anticipation.”
“Madam, I would like to ask the Minister whether there could be at least an internal appraisal system to rank lift companies in terms of their performance, the quality of the installations. For example, for certain companies that have a very high frequency of reported defects or repairs needed even after a new installation, that when considering which company to award the tender to, that could also be factored in as well.”
“Mdm Speaker, I would like to ask the Parliamentary Secretary whether both the LTVP and LTVP+ holders are eligible to get a Letter of Consent from MOM and can look for jobs with any employer in Singapore. That is the first matter. The second question is: should they encounter rejections from employers who say that they cannot employ them, even with a Letter of Consent, notwithstanding other possible reasons, what should they do? Because one of the feedback has been that employers still consider them as foreign workers and say that it is really troublesome to hire them. That is not very helpful when they are also trying to work to supplement their household income and working towards gaining PR status so that their citizen families – generally, the majority are citizen families – can stay intact and remain stable in Singapore.”
“I would like to build on what my hon parliamentary colleague Dr Lim Wee Kiak had said. For centres that are currently facing a shortage and possibly cannot even open, cannot even start operating, despite everything already being in place, what will the Ministry be doing, so that it can start operating and help parents who are in desperate need of childcare currently?”
“Mdm Speaker, I thank the Senior Minister of State for the answer. I would like to ask: for recalcitrant high-rise litterbugs, would the Ministry consider imposing a certain limit whereby if they have exceeded a number of times where they were caught for high-rise littering, that tougher measures beyond just fines will be imposed on them? For example, in very extreme cases, perhaps, confiscation of their flats. I believe there are some cases, where the litterbugs have been really recalcitrant despite many, many fines already imposed on the persons. Will the Ministry consider such a measure? Also, one of the issues is that high-rise litterbugs continue to offend on a daily basis, thinking they can get away with it. Will the Ministry consider revealing the identity of litterbugs who may be caught on camera so that the grassroots or agencies can then follow up with these persons and to try and persuade the persons to not litter in the future?”
“Hence, I believe that supporting a family in which most are Singaporeans, that means perhaps with a foreign parent, we are no doubt helping to build strong Singaporean families. Hence, I hope that MSF will continue its work in anchoring the ideal of strong families and work closely with other Ministries to ensure that our policies help young couples to build strong Page: 54 families that can stand the test of time. Some things the Government cannot and should not interfere, but some things the Government can do to try to facilitate and help. For instance, we can try to allow or facilitate couples getting access to flats in mature estates near their parents so that they can have parental and familial support when they eventually have children. This, set against the background where the demand for childcare is increasingly high, I believe, is important. This is just an example, but I hope that MSF can continue to work with the various agencies and Ministries to look at how we can better support and help our young Singaporean families take root in Singapore. At the end of the day, the foundation of a strong Singaporean society would be to continue to have strong families. Therefore, helping them would, no doubt, help to build a stronger Singapore for the future. Madam, notwithstanding the concerns I have raised, I believe the proposed amendments to the Women's Charter are made in the right spirit. Hence, I support the proposed amendments to the Act.”
“Currently, I am glad to note that some voluntary welfare organisations (VWOs) have taken the initiative to address this issue. Thye Hua Kwan, for example, has a Centre for Family Harmony at Circuit Road in MacPherson. I have visited the centre and have also come to understand the plights of some of these divorced parents. This centre allows supervised visitations so that, despite a divorce, both parents can continue to be present and be a responsible father or mother to the child. In this respect, could MSF share whether such a service will be scaled up and whether MSF has other plans to complement such an effort? Finally, while I am encouraged by MSF's move to provide more protection and support to children affected by their parents' divorce, the ideal must be to build strong families in Singapore. As I have said earlier, the biggest victim in a divorce would be the children. Not only do they have to cope with the immediate pain and anxieties, instability and other adjustment issues, they also risk suffering longer-term effects, such as trust and relationship problems in their adulthood. Hence, we must not subject innocent children to such pain as far as possible. There is another group, another category of Singaporean families, that I feel we must continue to support as well – families with foreign parents. In most cases, there are genuine marriages involving a foreign spouse. While a marriage of convenience cannot be tolerated nor condoned, as it violates the sacredness of marriage, we must do more to recognise and support genuine marriages with foreign spouses. Love cannot be ordained; nobody should tell us who we can or cannot marry.”
“Therefore, I am encouraged to hear that MSF is trying to better protect the interest of children affected by their parents' divorce through the MPP. But besides targeting divorcing and divorced parents, are there efforts to enhance support for the children affected? Also, MPP is only for parties who cannot agree on the divorce or ancillary matters. What about divorcing couples who can agree on all matters? Their children will still be affected by their parents' separation. How will MSF help them? On a related note, I believe that ensuring the children have continued access to both parents is important to their development. However, in some acrimonious divorces, the custodian parent may find ways to disallow the other party's access to the children, despite the agreement made. In some cases, the custodian parent hovers around and makes it difficult for the visiting parent to spend quality time with the children. In some cases, the custodian parent and visiting parent continue to fight during the visitation period. And in some cases, the custodian parent simply hides the children and refuses to reveal their whereabouts to the visiting parent. There is another example that I came across at the Meet-the-People Sessions (MPS). The poor mother came crying to me because she could not have access to her two children as the father decided to smuggle the children out of Singapore to Malaysia. Since it is out of our jurisdiction in Singapore and she has no relatives or contacts there, she was at a total loss, not knowing where to find her children, but yet she misses them and wanted to make sure they are okay. This, no doubt, will only worsen the already detrimental impact on the children.”
“Finally, as she was pregnant with her third child, this man impregnated another woman and was getting ready to marry this other woman, leaving her in the lurch. This poor lady had to fend for herself and to take care of her three children whom she loves dearly. Thankfully, her own family is supportive but they, too, are in financial difficulties. They came to me in tears because they were very upset that this man is going to leave her in the lurch while he marries this other woman whom he felt more attracted to, or for whatever reasons, he felt more strongly about. The three children will now have to face the consequences and the fate of having to depend on only a single source of resources and, that is, the mother. This mother is really struggling on her own. In such instances, I feel very sorry for the three children. This is unfair and, therefore, I would like to ask whether MSF can do something to make a provision such that, in such instances, the demand for maintenance from the very irresponsible parent will be made available to the single unwed parent who has to take care of the children. In this case, the focus is really on the welfare of the children; they are innocent and they, too, deserve to have an equal and good start in life because they, too, are born Singaporeans and they are the children of Singapore. Any end to a marriage can inflict great pain on both the man and woman who once loved each other and chose to be together till death do they part. However, if they have a family, the greatest pain is perhaps borne by their children. Children are born to their parents; they rely on, grow to love and share a deep bond with their parents. In a separation, children usually have no say in the Page: 53 decision and yet they are compelled to deal with the pain.”
“This would no doubt impose too much a burden on the likes of Mdm Foo and, in turn, would also impose a great burden and stress, to the disadvantage to the young children. Thirdly, what about the divorced women today who are still not receiving their monthly maintenance? While the provision is a step in the right direction, I do urge MSF to continue to strengthen its implementation and support to the ex-wives who need but have yet to receive their monthly maintenance. Otherwise, while we may have moved a step forward on the gender equality front, we risk regressing a step backward in terms of protecting vulnerable women – the very group of people this Charter was enacted to protect in the 1960s. We must recognise and support the group of women who had sacrificed the prime of their lives to care for their families and raise their children and, as a result, left themselves in a very vulnerable position. This is made worse-off if they have to also take on the role of being a breadwinner to support their children. Fourthly, I would like to ask whether MSF would consider putting in requirements to demand for maintenance from the irresponsible person who may have impregnated a woman, resulting in her becoming a single and unwed mother. I say this because I have a resident whom I feel very sympathetic towards. I understand the controversy, issues and concerns that the general society may have towards unwed parents, but, in this case, I have full sympathy towards this resident who is just a young lady. When she was much younger, she met a man who impregnated her and they had three children together. Every time she got pregnant, the man would promise to marry her, but every time, that promise never gets realised.”
“Firstly, what safeguards will MSF put in place to ensure that even though the applicant is incapacitated and appears to be the weaker party, maintenance will be granted only on legitimate grounds? For instance, what if the applicant had not even contributed to the raising of the family before he was incapacitated? Secondly, how will MSF ensure that this provision will not overburden the ex-wives, who are also granted custody of their children precisely because they are now the more abled party? These ex-wives may be in financial difficulties themselves. They are also most likely the sole breadwinner supporting their children. Let me cite an example. I have a resident. Let us call her Mdm Foo. She has two young children, two sons still in primary school. Her husband decided to divorce her for various reasons, but through no fault of hers. She has been working and has been financially independent. But her financial prowess and position were simply not strong enough for her to afford the payment of the home after the divorce because of the mandatory requirement to sell off the matrimonial flat. And having custody of her two sons means she will have to take care of them. Yet, despite her being Page: 52 economically active throughout her working life, she was not even able to afford the extra $3,000 to settle the final payment for the home that she was desperately trying to secure in order to continue to provide a stable and normalised life, post-divorce. So, in the likes of Mdm Foo, in the event that her ex-husband happens to be incapacitated and would like to demand for maintenance from her, how would she be able to afford?”
“Mdm Speaker, the Women's Charter is an important piece of legislation in Singapore. It was passed in 1961 to protect and advance the rights of women and girls in Singapore. At that time, the typical household division of labour was such that women would take care of the family at home, while men go out to work and bring the bread home. Many women, due to the lack of education and little control over or access to resources then, were often bullied and in worse instances, faced domestic violence. Therefore, I believe the Women's Charter passed in 1961 was a progressive and much needed piece of legislation. Fast forward more than 50 years to today, Singapore has progressed significantly and women today have made huge leaps on many fronts. Singaporean women today are driven and well-educated. We are capable of holding our own at workplaces. And with jobs, this means that we are or can be financially independent, generally speaking. Moreover, we have also observed a small, but growing, group of men who give up their jobs to devote full time to caring for their families. Therefore, it is timely to review the Women's Charter and update parts of the Charter to offer somewhat more gender balance. In this case, inserting a provision to allow men, very specifically incapacitated men who cannot work and support themselves, to apply for maintenance from their ex-wives is a step in the right direction. While we need to take bold steps and to recognise that the society has indeed, progressed and evolved and that there is greater gender equality that we observe now in our society, and that, with that, I support the provisions in principle, I do have a few concerns that I hope MSF can address.”
“We, all of us in this House, including my hon Non-Constituency Member of Parliament colleagues, must do our best. Such a privilege cannot be transferred. We must cherish it and, hence, in this Thirteenth Parliament, we must continue to speak up actively and work hard together to fulfil the five aims that the President has shared with us. SG100 takes time to build, but it is not that distant a dream. Let us continue to build on one another's strengths in fulfilling the vision of a safe, secure, caring and united Singapore. With that, I support the Motion. [Applause.] 4.34 pm Page: 48”
“At this juncture, I would like to highlight that active citizenry runs through almost all the points that I have made. Indeed, I believe that all Singaporeans have a shared responsibility in the many works of our nation. A truly caring society is not one in which the caring is only done by the Government or a selected group of people. A great nation is not one in which its people care only about themselves. Thankfully, I would say that Singaporeans do care. From the time I served as a grassroots leader, which would have been about 11 years ago, I have witnessed how many Singaporeans are prepared to sacrifice their personal time, space and resources to help others. I am constantly touched by their concern for the less fortunate or more vulnerable and, even more so, when those who needed help in the first place are also helping others. Such care and concern for our fellow men and women build trust, strengthen our community and keep us together. It inspires us to do better, to think about how our actions affect the others around us. It makes life worth living. Therefore, beyond policy debate or discussions of current affairs, we must continue to focus on building an active citizenry. This has to happen at all levels – within the community, we should enlist Singaporeans to form a network of support; within the nation, we should encourage volunteerism and charitable causes and engage citizens to give ideas for Singapore and to participate in building a better future for ourselves and our children. Finally, it is a privilege to serve and to stand in Parliament. Singaporeans sent us into Parliament because they trust us and hope that we can give voice to the challenges, worries, hopes and dreams that they have.”
“Secondly, the PHG is meant for resale flats and, while the resale prices are no longer going up, many young couples continue to find the prices beyond their purchasing power. Hence, while the PHG helps to offset part of a resale flat's price premium over a subsidised one, it is still not enough to make a resale flat within the affordability range to them. As such, could we seriously consider Page: 47 increasing the quota of flats set aside under MCPS per BTO development? Thirdly, we need to continue to entrench the belief that mothers can continue to contribute and value-add in the workplace and society. We need employers and colleagues to be understanding to mothers who go on maternity or childcare leave. Once, a young mother wrote to me to share her woes about her employer who would make scathing remarks when she took maternity leave. Her employer approved of the leave anyway because it was mandated, but were the remarks necessary? We need to enable more flexi-work arrangements so that mothers can still contribute fully even as they take childcare leave. We need fair appraisal systems that focus on the quality of work done and that do not mark down mothers simply because they are out of action for a few months. Such behaviours – mean remarks and unfair appraisal systems – are manifestations of an underlying prejudice that mothers are liabilities at work, thereby negating the value that they can offer professionally and to our society. We should work to improve the situation in Singapore so that women can thrive in both motherhood and career. Madam, I have just shared my thoughts and suggestions on how we can better care and enable our elderly and young families in Singapore.”
“In the course of my constituency work, I have met many housewives who are experienced and willing to care for neighbours' children and whose children have grown up. They love children and, of course, a little pocket money would not hurt. At the same time, I have also just recently come across a young couple with two-year-old triplets who are in desperate need of support. The couple need to work, their parents have yet to retire and they could not find a reliable maid. Hence, we are now looking to the "auntie-network" within the community to provide some interim childcare support in the meantime, especially with Chinese New Year nearing. Can we expand such arrangements into a wider support scheme? Could we systematically identify and build up a formal network of housewives within communities? Their profiles and childcaring resumes can be consolidated into a directory which young families can refer to when considering childcare options. And for quality assurance, the enrolled housewives can go through basic courses to update them on some of the latest developments, needs and standards. Two, could we further facilitate familial support by increasing the quota of flats set aside under the Married Child Priority Scheme (MCPS) per BTO development? The Government must be credited for enhancing MCPS about two years ago and for introducing the Proximity Housing Grant (PHG) last year. But there continues to be a demand. Firstly, there are still young couples who sincerely hope to secure a new flat near their parents for mutual care and support but have been unsuccessful in their ballot despite the priority. This challenge is exacerbated when their parents live in mature estates, where flat supply is already scarce and where competition is also keener.”