Tin Pei Ling
Singapore
“This is not about building a talent pipeline and reserve for the land, sea and air transport sectors, but also about helping Singaporeans seize more valuable opportunities. (In English): Mr Speaker, Singapore did not inherit our connectivity. We built it deliberately, chapter by chapter, and this House now holds the pen for the next one.”
“Thank you, Chairman. Two questions. One is that I hear that there will be a review of the COE system later part of this year. I would just like to ask if there is a specific timeline that we can look forward to. Second is on land transport overall. It is on the impact of ageing population and ageing infrastructure.”
“Leveraging frontier technologies – automation, advanced sensors, predictive analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) – will keep our infrastructure globally competitive. But we must deploy technology responsibly to augment productivity while managing workforce transitions and reskilling needs.”
“Many thanks to all. I beg leave to withdraw my amendment. [(proc text) Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. (proc text)] [(proc text) The sum of $3,109,174,200 for Head W ordered to stand part of the Main Estimates. (proc text)] [(proc text) The sum of $13,306,280,300 for Head W ordered to stand part of the Development Estimates. (proc text)]”
“Can the Ministry consider targeted measures, such as rental relief schemes, tenancy support for heritage and neighbourhood retailers, incentives for landlords to prioritise local tenants or co‑investment platforms that enable local businesses to secure long‑term premises?”
“Internationally, we could forge norms that prevent regulatory arbitrage and ensure cross‑border accountability. Hence, building on existing frameworks, what more will the Government do to strengthen Singapore's role in global AI governance, standards, certification, international coordination and capacity building, to preserve human agenc…”
The complete record
Every one of 781 lines we hold for Tin Pei Ling, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 2 of 16.
“The ordinary users, that is, the "small fry", are often disadvantaged. It is not that there is no legal recourse at present. But when a victim is already stressed out by the fire burning online, how can she/he find the mental space to navigate the laws and take the right actions? As it is, the relevant statutes addressing harmful online content and conduct include a wide range – POHA, Broadcasting Act, POFMA, Foreign Interference (Countermeasures) Act and OCHA. How can a victim navigate these laws and will OSRA, which is the Bill that we are debating now, overlap with existing laws and frameworks? Must the victim make reports to multiple agencies, or will agencies coordinate amongst themselves? In the 2014 case that I shared earlier, my resident and his fiancée felt lost, even I felt somewhat exhausted trying to help them navigate the various agencies. How will the new OSC help, or not help, to overcome this? That being the case, we must also guard against abuse of this new mechanism. What measures are in place to prevent OSC being made use of by devious characters to make vexatious reporting or be weaponised to fix another person due to private disputes? Adding on, I wish to express my welcome to the amendments' focus on finality in appeals. Without timely finality, resourceful perpetrators can exploit appeals to delay takedowns, prolong exposure and continue with the abuse. All things equal, some considerations simply should take priority. Hence here, protection against harm must be prioritised. I refer to hon Member He Ting Ru's proposed amendment. I had a little bit of concern that I wish to set out here. I find the use of "fair comments" here somewhat fuzzy and highly subjective.”
“The company is registered in Amsterdam and even the individual, who happens to my fiance's ex-boyfriend, who uploaded the photo is unable to remove them without the website host's approval who, ultimately, would only do so if the removal fee is paid. Since then, my fiancée has lost sleep, could not eat or work in peace, especially not while witnessing the links to her compromising photos appear on search results while looking up her name." At that time, POHA was just introduced and yet to take effect. But the issue at hand was real and pressing. I recall we had to approach various agencies to try to figure out how to stop it and protect the fiancée. Eventually, we managed block access domestically to protect her. Fast forward to today, things have improved. We have more legislation in place and stronger enforcement capabilities. There is greater societal awareness and to be fair, the social media industry has also been more responsive than before. But online harms have not gone away. We may no longer find the "Revenge Porn" website now, but we can still remember the fairly recent "SG Nasi Lemak" Telegram chatgroup. The format and vectors have changed – from public websites to private chatgroups and dodgy apps. And so, our legislation and interventions must change too. So, I believe the clearer definitions in this round of amendments will accelerate investigation and enforcement. Speed is critical. The longer harmful material remains public, the greater the lasting damage. Yet, victims today still find the reporting process confusing and daunting. Reporting to social media platforms often feels like a "lucky draw", you cannot be sure whether they will agree to remove the post or when they will do so, if they agree to do so.”
“Calling for the Social Media Services (SMSs) and App Distribution Services (ADSs) to step up in measures to better protect young users from being exposed to age-inappropriate or harmful content. Calling for these SMSs and ADSs to improve timeliness in responding to user reports on harmful content on their platforms. Here, I must stress that the importance of timely interventions cannot be understated. Thankfully, both sides of the House supported the Motion. Therefore, I am glad that we are now taking a step further in building an inclusive and safe digital society through stronger legislation and measures against online harms. The key features of this amendment are: firstly, a clearer definition of online harms; secondly, the establishment of an Office of the Commissioner of Online Safety; and thirdly, powers to enable speedy interventions when harms are detected. These measures address the problems victims often face – speed and uncertainty. Allow me to share a story of my resident's fiancée back in 2014. She was a victim of "Revenge Porn". This story remains pertinent today. My resident's fiancée's ex-boyfriend uploaded very compromising photos of her onto websites such as "Revenge Porn", which was outlawed by California but was still available online because the sites were hosted overseas. These photos were taken while they were still in the relationship and when there was still trust. Following the uploads, there were many unsavoury comments by people she knew and did not know and after a while, even her friends started to notice it and asked her about it. Imagine the shame, the embarrassment, the kind of distress that she had to endure. Quoting my resident, he stated, "to complicate matters, the website is hosted in the US.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, online harms – whether harassment, non-consensual intimate imagery, deepfakes, scams or coordinated disinformation – inflict real damage to mental and physical well-being, economic security, public discourse, safety and public trust in digital systems. Unlike physical or verbal harassment, online harms spread instantaneously, exponentially and often beyond our immediate control. Content posted today can be duplicated, archived, indexed and re‑shared, leaving permanent scars on victims' reputations and livelihoods. The asymmetry of power is stark. It is easy for anyone to publish, but hard for victims, especially ordinary users, to have harmful content removed. The burden of proof and the effort to seek redress often fall on those already traumatised. Hence, whether at the individual or society level, we must have in place effective and firm mitigation across policy, enforcement, technology, education and civil society to tackle the ills of online harms. As mentioned, this House has debated these issues before. In January last year, I moved the Motion on Building an Inclusive and Safe Digital Society together with our then-Digital Development and Information GPC colleagues. During the Motion debate, we reaffirmed our commitment to adopt a whole-of-nation approach to sustain trust by building an inclusive and safe digital society. Members who participated actively discussed, amongst other things, online harms. In all, the then-Digital Development and Information GPC members and PAP MPs who spoke set out a total of 13 Calls to Action, which included: Calling on Social Media Services to be accountable for the proliferation of harmful content and malicious ads on their platforms.”
“Still, I would like to ask the following questions, One, can more data or statistics be shared about how visitorship has trended over the past years for Geylang East Library and indeed, other libraries in Singapore? Two, how has overall readership, whether it is via physical loans or digital access, been trending? Three, in terms of lifetime cost, how much does it cost to maintain a standalone building like the Geylang East one versus co-locating it in a shopping mall? Four, if Geylang East Library has to really must be relocated, what will the NLB do to ensure that our residents continue to have easy access to not just the publications but also a space where they can feel safe, to learn, grow and stay meaningfully engaged? Will the community library be possible? How will the NLB work with our community to achieve this? Even as our libraries adopt new models and go digital, let us not lose what once brought us joy, the feel of a real book in our hands, the wonder through crowded shelves that sparks imagination and the shared pleasure of coming together to do something meaningful as a community. In conclusion, libraries continue to be a key foundation for our society and the future. They remind us that civilisation is built not just on technology or trade, but on ideas shared, stories told, and communities formed. In Singapore, libraries remain vital to our national progress, nurturing our minds, connecting our people and helping us navigate an uncertain world. We must treasure them, invest in them and ensure that even as they evolve, our people can continue to access our libraries meaningfully and freely.”
“To them, the building is more than a physical icon in MacPherson, but a huge part of their memories, our collective memories. To learn of the relocation, we all feel a deep sense of loss. Having learnt of the relocation, I reached out to NLB to appeal. According to NLB, there are some reasons that they have considered to make this decision. Firstly, Geylang East Public Library, which occupies a building of more than 30 years old, has experienced a steady decline in its visitorship and loans. According to NLB, both its visitorship and loans are consistently lower when compared to other public libraries over the last few years. Therefore, moving it to the revamped Tanjong Katong Complex will enable NLB, which is publicly funded and with a public mission, to reach out to a larger catchment, while still being able to serve the residents in MacPherson. Secondly, from NLB's past experiences, a library being co-located in a shopping mall brings much higher visitorship than being a standalone facility. This is because of the synergy with other activities in a shopping mall. Therefore, under the Library of the Future Masterplan, NLB's strategy is to move standalone libraries to shopping malls when opportunities come about. Thirdly, NLB considered the alternative approach of retaining the library at its current location and revamping it in-situ. But it is not cost effective to do so given the ageing infrastructure and it will cost much more than co-locating it in a shopping mall. So, the above three reasons were what I have learnt from NLB. I understand these reasons and the need for NLB to consider different factors and trade-offs. Ultimately, the NLB has a national mission, but they also need to ensure public dollars are well-spent.”
“Our libraries have never stood still, from card catalogues to digital search, from physical shelves to e-books and online databases, from quiet reading rooms to hubs of creativity, where makerspaces, storytelling corners, and digital labs now flourish. I still remember the days when I had to buy a cashcard to photocopy many, many pages of books so that I can go home and do my project work or paper. Today, we can easily access the material needed digitally. So, our libraries have evolved with the times. And in the future, libraries can evolve even further. Changing lifestyles, evolving reading patterns and ongoing digitalisation are some of the key drivers of how we access and consume knowledge. As such, I understand that our libraries, from its form, location, to service delivery, will have to adapt as well. Already, the National Library Board (NLB) has put in tremendous effort to go digital over the years, preserving precious data and publications using digital means, introducing apps and more. That being said, it is with a heavy heart that we learn of the Geylang East Library ceasing operations at its current premise in 2030. The plan, as announced by NLB is to relocate the library to the new Tanjong Katong Complex. Residents from MacPherson, and nearby constituencies, such as Jalan Besar and Geylang Serai, had voiced concerns about this decision. These residents have deep emotional attachments to the library, many of whom grew up with the library. They have similar stories like Ervin's. Some enjoy bringing their children to the library as it is a safe space for their young ones to hang out and stay engaged meaningfully. Some have senior parents who see it as a daily routine to go the library to read, socialise and stay active.”
“In a world of growing divisions, libraries remain one of the most welcoming spaces in society. Libraries are also a safe and nurturing space for children within the community. A friend of mine, Ervin Yeo, shared with me that he grew up in the Geylang East Library, which is situated in MacPherson. When he was a little boy, his grandmother, who was also his caregiver, would leave him there while she went about her daily chores and he would roam the library, freely access the wide range of books available and soak in the wisdom that the books offered. Growing up in such an environment must have shaped his affable personality and sharp intellect. He later became a scholar and, today, he is a highly successful senior corporate leader. More recently, a few of my residents, who are young parents of children with special needs, shared with me that the Geylang East Library have been a safe haven for their children. When they are busy at work, they find it most reassuring when they know that their children are in the safe bounds of the library with their caregivers. They know that it is a safe space that can help their children learn and grow, that does not judge but embraces all their uniqueness. Libraries are also a social space for seniors to stay connected with friends and new knowledge. Again, at the Geylang East Library, we have many seniors who enjoy the access to a wide range of newspapers, publications and an environment where they feel familiar and comfortable. Apart from meeting like-minded friends from the neighbourhood, they could also participate in the talks, workshops and experience sessions that the library offers. The library and what it offers give them a reason to look forward to each new day.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, libraries have been an integral part of civilisation throughout history and most definitely an integral part of our lives. Libraries are not mere buildings with shelves of books. From the Library of Alexandria in antiquity to Singapore’s National Library today, libraries have served as enduring institutions for the preservation of knowledge and the advancement of society. Civilisations rise when they record, preserve and share knowledge. The act of collecting stories, ideas and discoveries, and making them accessible, has been at the core of humanity’s advancement. Libraries have carried wisdom across centuries and borders. They embody the conviction that knowledge should be shared with the many. For a nation, libraries are more than cultural symbols. In Singapore, where our greatest resource is our people, libraries play a role in nurturing our human capital. Our libraries have supported lifelong learning, from children discovering their first storybook to adults picking up new knowledge and skills. They have anchored national literacy campaigns, strengthened education and provided safe and open spaces for learning. In an era where information can be overwhelming and sometimes misleading, libraries equip citizens with the ability to discern, to think critically, and to engage responsibly in civic life. Libraries in our community, beyond civilisation and progress, libraries are also about community. In Singapore, our libraries are not silent monuments. They are vibrant living spaces, where neighbours and friends meet, where students study, where seniors gather for talks and where families come together. Libraries provide not just access to information, but access to one another. They embody inclusiveness, anyone can step in freely.”
“Mr Speaker, I forgot to declare my interest that I am working in a major payment institution and therefore, just now, earlier in my speech, I mentioned the closed-door event organised by my firm. I would like to declare my interest here.”
“In conclusion, we have defied the odds then, we will defy the odds again and again. I support the Motion.”
“As elected MPs, we will certainly follow the same philosophy, serve wholeheartedly and trust our constituents, living up to their expectations. As a democratic country, of course we cannot be autocratic. The key point is that we do not make compromises because we fear losing. We do so because we choose to have our nation and the people at heart and work for the long-term interests of the country and people. (In English): Sir, this year, we celebrate SG60. As a Singaporean, I am glad that we have not let our forefathers down. Singapore remains a shining red dot on the world stage. Yet, as President Tharman reminded us, Singapore now stands again at a pivotal moment. A nation tested by history, by the turbulence of a shifting world and by profound domestic changes. Singapore has always risen to respond to challenges time and again, through our openness and resilience, through our long-term planning and willingness to take action, through our resolve, grit and unity. And it shall be no different now as we mark SG60. At this point, I would also like to take the opportunity to thank the residents of MacPherson and the broader Marine Parade-Braddell Heights group representation constituency (GRC). Thank you for your trust in us, in me, so that we can continue this journey together, so that we can be your voice in this House. We have grown together for so many years in the past. We have overcome many different and difficult moments, including the COVID-19 pandemic. Together, we have come up with new ideas to strengthen our community, to better our services, to deliver common good for the broader community. We have raised funds and crowdsourced for ideas, and I believe that we will continue to grow stronger together.”
“" We must strive to give all Singaporeans, young and old, reasons and motivation to look forward to each new day. With our never-give-up spirit, we will transform longevity into a source of strength. Just now, WP parliamentary colleagues seemed to insinuate that my party is autocratic in their speech. Let me respond to this. Since coming to power, the PAP has consistently upheld a people-centric philosophy in governing the nation. Whilst our governing methods may differ at various points in time, our original intentions and principles remain unchanged. In the early days of independence, we faced harsh and volatile environment, surrounded by challenges on all sides. This naturally required decisive leadership to lead the people and nation through difficulties. Our achievement has made people proud. On the international stage, though we are a small red dot, our voice is not small, and the overall quality of life for our people has been substantially improved. This could only be achieved through the dedication of our leaders and the full cooperation of our people. Today, we have had three Prime Ministers and welcome the fourth generation of leadership led by Prime Minister Lawrence Wong. The PAP's governing philosophy remains unchanged. In the Prime Minister’s many important speeches, he has consistently emphasised people-centric governance and a We-first sprit. The Prime Minister has also promised that the Government will continue to listen to Singaporeans' voices through various channels, so that we can all participate in nation-building, build trust and deepen our national identity to achieve common goals. Facing a diverse society, we must be inclusive and accommodating, drawing strengths from all and learning from each other, so that we can go far.”
“Today, we face different but equally severe adversities. The international order is being restructured, US-China rivalry is intensifying, and the economic environment is increasingly uncertain. These changes profoundly affect supply chains, trade and talent flows, and will inevitably impact Singapore. Geopolitical competition and rising protectionism will reshape choices of procurement and manufacturing locations, logistics patterns and trade flows. This will shake our position as a hub, affect our economic development, and impact our people's long-term livelihoods and quality of life. Deglobalisation also means that globally-minded Singapore enterprises may be unable to fully deploy their capabilities and realise their ambitions. Therefore, even as the world fluctuates with both old and new pressures coexisting, Singapore must still strive for stability. When other nations build walls, we must build bridges. We must uphold the rule of law, strengthen external and domestic trust in our institutions, remain open whilst ensuring our citizens feel secure amidst turbulence. We never give up: demographics need not be a constraint. Our society is changing. Population is aging; younger generation is facing vastly different challenges, lifestyles are also changing accordingly. Our policy formulation and implementation must stay relevant. Many view ageing as a burden. But in Singapore, we can and should reshape how we view old age. Over the years, our government has been committed to supporting our elderly to live healthier, more fulfilling and more productive lives through better healthcare and more diverse social and community structures. We must reject the negative mindset of "waiting to die" or "being useless when old.”
“Overall, planning norms, quality standards and budgets will have to change. Thirdly, climate changes will add to the challenges we face. Higher temperatures, more intense storms and rising sea levels can accelerate material degradation, strain our drainage and power systems and increase the need for backup and emergency response capabilities. Taken together, Singapore must take a strategic approach that treats infrastructure as long‑lived systems requiring continuous investment, greater use of digital solutions for better oversight and periodic, deep renewal. This means having to consider new norms, higher standards, more predictive approaches and, unfortunately, higher public spending. A tough job for the Ministry of Finance (MOF). Though refreshing or building new infrastructure is not exactly defying the odds, it is important because the right build environment can free us from everyday friction, sharpen our focus, spark creativity and unlock our best performance. In Mandarin. (In Mandarin): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] In his address at the Opening of Parliament, President Tharman pointed out that Singapore stands at a historical juncture. Despite global turbulence and mounting uncertainties, we must maintain resilience and inclusivity, moving forward with steady steps towards the future. Singapore's story has never been ordinary. This extraordinariness stems from Singaporeans' quiet determination to "never give up." We never give up: rising from historical adversity. Our forefathers refused to let circumstances limit us. Through perseverance, unity and foresight, Singapore became a prosperous economy and harmonious society that makes us proud today. We never give up: we must strive to break through amidst de-globalisition and a turbulent world.”
“Singapore's hardware and infrastructure, from HDB flats and estate common facilities to rail networks, power cables and more, underpin daily and community life, economic activity and national resilience. Much of this built capital has served our nation well for decades, but with demographic shifts, technological changes, climate risks and simply the passage of time, mean that the "business as usual" maintenance and periodic upgrades are no longer sufficient. Singapore must refresh existing hardware and infrastructure more intensively and build new, future‑ready ones to sustain living standards. Firstly, with age comes wear and tear. Pipes, lifts, walls, ceilings and other components in flats and housing precincts suffer wear, obsolescence and greater fault frequency, worse if they happen together. For those of us who have mature housing estates, will know that the lifts cannot last until the recommended 28 years. Our Town Council, for example, had to bring forward the replacement of over 100 lifts in MacPherson because it has come to a point whereby the lifts just kept breaking down, no matter how much we maintained the lifts. Our rail lines, signalling, substations and power distribution networks could face the same challenge. Hence, deeper interventions and bigger budgets are to be expected. Secondly, as our demographics shift, demand patterns and standards will evolve. For example, an aging population means greater use of lifts, means more sheltered walkways with more benches needed for resting along the way. With the move to using more electronic vehicles and eventually autonomous vehicles as well, more charging stations and other infrastructure will be needed, and so space and power allocation has to change.”
“At home, our society is also changing. Our population is ageing. Our younger generations face vastly different challenges. The way we live, work and play are different. Our policies, approach and infrastructure have to evolve. Gen Z today face challenges different from that of mine. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, Gen Z Singaporeans missed out on internships and overseas exchange experiences. Also, with the rise of AI, entry-level jobs are affected and job search strategies that used to work may no longer work now. Fragmented career paths could be a permanent trend. It is, thus, heartening to observe the Government's efforts in supporting our youths in their education and employment. Such efforts to empower and keep them relevant must continue. Many may see an ageing population as a burden, but in Singapore, we can and should shape how we age. We can organise ourselves so that seniors enjoy healthier and more fulfilling lives supported by better healthcare, stronger communities and lifelong learning. Much has been said about how to support our seniors better, so I will not expound them again here. But what is worth repeating is that we must make sure that our seniors today and tomorrow do not give up on themselves. We must not be handicapped by our own prejudices towards old age. We must continue to work on our policies, infrastructure and programmes to enable seniors to live healthier, work better, if they so choose, and play harder. Defy the odds by transforming longevity into our source of strength. It is not just our people who age. So does our hardware and infrastructure.”
“It could be inter-operable payment rails using tokens to reduce our region's overreliance on any particular currency or cross border payment rail. It could be a cross‑border real‑time payments utility hosted in Singapore, given our strong legal and regulatory trust framework. It could be a tokenised trade and commodities platforms to facilitate trade finance. It could also be an independent digital arbitration and compliance registry trusted by companies and institutions for sanctions, export control vetting and contract enforcement, leveraging our strong legal services, combined with the use of blockchain for audit trails and AI for evidence analysis. It could be a certified, geopolitically neutral cloud and confidential compute marketplace for regional or international enterprises needing to maintain independence. It could also be a decentralised energy and critical minerals marketplace offering trusted certifications as geopolitical competition for energy and critical minerals intensifies. Some of these are probably already being considered by the Government or happening as we speak. These are just broad ideas and examples of how Singapore can defy the odds of our extrinsic reality. I am sure there are many other and better ideas out there. So, in this term, I urge that we continue promoting public-private partnerships to discover new ideas, to deliver excellence and to create new possibilities for Singapore. Ultimately, our relentless pursuit for economic progress – survival, in this case – is and must be rooted in our pursuit of improving lives for our people. So, even as the world churns and pressures, Singapore must endeavour to remain stable. As others build walls, Singapore will build bridges. Next, defying the odds of demographics.”
“As countries increasingly turn inward, doubting the benefits of globalisation and retreating from multilateralism, one wonders how Singapore companies can still dream global? Hence, in the face of these extrinsic challenges, Singapore must remain a stable node in an unstable world. A place where investors can trust the rule of law, where talent knows merit is valued and where citizens feel secure amidst global disruption. At the same time, we must be a stable node that is resilient. As a hub, we have to offer secure and diversified services to support the supply chains and trade. We also have to enhance our trade facilitation and digital services to keep competitive. We must also be a stable node with many connections. We must continue to be among the world's most open and connected hubs, in air and sea transport, in trade and finance, in talent, data flows and digital networks. Here, I applaud our Government's efforts in constantly building up our position as air and sea hubs. The much anticipated Terminal 5 and Changi East development will no doubt add to Singapore's competitive advantage. It is also encouraging to know of our Government's efforts to sign more Free Trade Agreements and Digital Economy Agreements, making sure we maintain high standards and inter-operability for data, digital infrastructure and networks so that trade and innovation can still flourish. Could we do more? The answer must be yes. Technological advancements have been enablers but also game changers. Singapore may not be known for inventing foundational technologies, but we can invent new systems and excel in applications built upon these technologies. For example, leverage our strategic position in ASEAN and build regional digital financial infrastructure.”
“Recent trends, from abrupt policy shifts, perceived abandonment of allies, sudden tariff escalations and weakening of multilateral and international bodies have exposed those vulnerabilities and heightened geopolitical uncertainty. These have significant impact on how supply chains are structured, on trade and talent flows and definitely on Singapore. Escalating geopolitical rivalry and US protectionism will reshape sourcing, manufacturing location decisions, logistics patterns and trade flows. These will affect Singapore's advanced manufacturing which contributes to over 20% of our GDP and other sectors of the trade and our status as a hub. Interestingly, in a recent closed door sharing organised by my firm with large scale international payment service providers supporting cross border trade, an observation made was that trade is now more point-to-point, as opposed to passing through central nodes. Also, "friendshoring" by firms would also mean that trades happen within allied blocs. Singapore would have to ensure that we continue to participate in the various trading blocs, which we have been thankfully so far. But this is also contingent on not being forced to choose sides. In addition, the US tariffs, if they persist, could have profound implications on Singapore as highlighted by our leaders in this House before. The US tariff on Singapore may be relatively low but given how we import, value-add and then export, other countries could pass the cost of tariffs to us, resulting in our overall costs and prices to go up. At some point, coupled with the possibility of preferential trade agreements favouring bilateral corridors and logistics optimisations, we could be priced out of the competition and trade and firms could bypass Singapore altogether.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I rise to support the Address of Thanks to President Tharman's speech at this Parliament's Opening. President, in his speech, spoke of Singapore being at a critical juncture in our history as we celebrate SG60, and the importance of how we must remain resilient and inclusive, embracing the "we first" mindset, even as we navigate a turbulent world and transform for the future. Indeed, Singapore's story has been remarkable, characterised by a silent defiance. Firstly, defying the odds of history. When Singapore became independent in 1965, many doubted our survival. We were a small nation with no natural resources. Deep social divides, racial riots and hostile neighbours could have torn us apart. Yet, we defied the odds. Through grit, unity and foresight, we transformed ourselves into a thriving economy and a cohesive society that we are proud of today. Our early generations refused to be defined by limitations and built a nation greater than the sum of its parts. Then, defying the odds of de-globalisation and a turbulent world. Today, the odds we face are different, but just as formidable. The global order is shifting, major powers are contesting influence and the economic climate is more uncertain than ever. Following the Cold War, Pax Americana shaped the international order, building institutions, establishing rules-based international order and delivering a long period of relative stability and prosperity. Yet, concentration of power carries risk. If a single hegemon ceases to act as a steady, rules‑based steward, the global system can be destabilised.”
“I have two supplementary questions. The first one is that I think so far, reports in the media as well as what have been shared in this House seem to suggest that there have been no observed trends or at least systemic factors causing the recent spate of incidents since July. But it would definitely seem like really terrible luck for all of these to happen in such a short span of time. With more lines to be added to the system, there will be more assets to be maintained, more manpower, more budget that will be needed. How will the Ministry of Transport (MOT) and the PTOs work to assure that our rail performance will continue to be reliable going forward? Second, given what the Minister had shared earlier about the example of how one disruption can greatly reduce the MKBF and achieving of the target, is this still a fair measurement of rail reliability?”
“I would like to express my sincere thanks to Minister Josephine Teo, Senior Minister of State Janil Puthucheary as well as Senior Minister of State Tan Kiat How and Minister of State Rahayu Mahzam, as well as all the MDDI family officers. Thank you for the hard work. It is, indeed, a complex amount of work that has to be put in in order to position us well in the digital realm. With that, I beg leave to withdraw my amendment. [(proc text) Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. (proc text)] [(proc text) The sum of $2,956,698,500 for Head Q ordered to stand part of the Main Estimates. (proc text)] [(proc text) The sum of $103,188,200 for Head Q ordered to stand part of the Development Estimates. (proc text)]”
“Chairman, I have three clarifications. First of all, it is heartening to hear of the many measures put in place to protect Singaporeans better from online harms. I would also like to find out what more will be done or has been done so far to protect citizens from scams so that they will feel safe, competent and more confident to interact and transact online, which is also part of the trust that we talked about. Secondly, it is about DeepSeek. Sir, I would like to ask what are some of the lessons drawn from the recent emergence of DeepSeek, since it has been touted to be cheaper and greener, and also the implications to us in Singapore, whether it is even possible for us to distill something that is unique to Singapore. Lastly, picking up on the point on funding vernacular media, I think vernacular media has a strategic part to play, especially in projecting Singapore's voice and opinion on key issues internationally. Zaobao, for example, has a very strong presence and network in certain areas or regions. It has been very useful in asserting our point of view. So, I would like to ask whether the funding support in this area will be continued or strengthened and what else might we be doing to boost this so that we can strengthen Singapore's position on the world stage.”
“We have signed Digital Economy Agreements (DEAs) with countries, such as Australia, the United Kingdom (UK) and New Zealand, and we are actively advancing the Association for Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Digital Economy Framework Agreement. These initiatives will facilitate data sharing, harmonise understanding and standards, promote technological collaboration and perhaps also help combat online harms, ensuring that we remain at the forefront of the global digital economy. Therefore, can the Minister provide an update on how the Government is collaborating with governments and organisations globally to build capabilities, facilitate data sharing and transactions, and combat online harms? SPH Media Trust – KPIs”
“How does IMDA plan to support businesses at different stages of digital maturity in adopting and leveraging Gen AI technologies, and what specific benefits would the Minister anticipate for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) from these new initiatives? At the same time, geopolitical tensions, particularly the United States (US)-China rivalry, pose challenges. Companies will need clarity and assurances when choosing which Gen AI platforms to adopt. For example, some may have concerns about the use of DeepSeek's AI models due to potential implications from US sanctions. As we navigate these complex dynamics, there may be scope for us to provide clearer guidelines and support for our enterprises to adopt technology without fear of reprise or sanctions from either of the major powers. Building on hon Member Henry Kwek's point made during the Budget debate, I agree that it is important to ensure that we are able to build up a model that can take into consideration our local social values, ethical standards and other more local factors. If we take a look at DeepSeek, we also know that DeepSeek itself, hailed as a breakthrough, was also distilled from many other AI models as well. Therefore, I would like to ask whether it is possible for Singapore to also develop or distill our own AI model, so that our companies can leverage on this and to continue to grow and develop with greater sense of assurance. Finally, global cooperation is essential. In a world where digital economies are increasingly interconnected, Singapore's role as a financial and trade hub is more important than ever.”
“And by fostering a vibrant community of talents, research institutes and enterprises, ideas can cross-fertilise, collaborations can happen and we can create a virtuous cycle of innovation that benefits both our economy and our people. Public and private partnerships, along with robust peer-to-peer collaboration, are essential to provide the meaningful opportunities that will keep talent anchored in Singapore. Hence, can the Minister provide an update about what is being done to strengthen our talent pool and enhance the "staying power" of these talents and community of partners in Singapore? Next, our local enterprises are a key part of the engine driving our economy. We must help our local enterprises to adopt new and impactful technologies, so that the power of these innovations can be fully unleashed to benefit our economy and Singaporeans. Over the years, the Government has taken significant steps to support these enterprises in adopting new technologies. However, with the breakthrough of Gen AI models, such as those that have emerged recently, we must redouble our efforts. It is imperative that enterprises across sectors integrate AI into their core strategies and operations. And a more targeted approach for specific sectors and for businesses with different digital maturity is needed to help them move along. With the recent refresh of the Industry Digital Plans (IDPs) for several sectors and the launch of new IDPs for the legal and tourism sectors, can the Minister elaborate on how these plans are tailored to address sector-specific AI tools and challenges?”
“Sir, in my opening cut and in my past speeches in this House, I set out why I think digitalisation is important to our nation's growth and well-being. I talked about both the opportunities and challenges that come along with that. I also shared that there are several factors that I believe are imperative to a digitally successful future, namely: world-class digital infrastructure, vibrant talent community and ecosystem, widespread adoption by businesses, sustainable and green development, safe and inclusive digital society, and stronger global cooperation. Here, I will talk about talents and ecosystem, support for businesses and global cooperation. Narrowing the focus on AI, Singapore has a clear strategy as set out in the National AI Strategy (NAIS) 2.0 report. In the report, Singapore sees AI as no longer an opportunity but a necessity, that it has to go from projects to system and that it has to go from local to global. Now that NAIS 2.0 has been launched for more than a year since December 2023, can the Minister share what are some of the efforts and outcomes in driving adoption, experimentation and innovation for the Government and industry? Within NAIS 2.0, people and communities form an important system. I fully agree. No digital future can be realised without the right human capital. We must nurture our young, build our native talent pipeline and attract the brightest minds from across the globe. Not only do we want to build up our Singaporeans to have what it takes to capitalise on the opportunities in and out of Singapore, we want them to learn and spar with top talents.”
“(In English): Sir, our pursuit for digital growth and realising a digital future will mean nothing if it cannot be sustained and if our people do not feel safe or get to enjoy the benefits of digitalisation. Hence, I seek to move. [(proc text) Question proposed. (proc text)]”
“And in ensuring safety, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong mentioned that there will be a new law to protect victims from online harms, when he launched Smart Nation 2.0. In the very recent media report, we have been told that, and that is just last month, that online harms have been increasing because the number of people who have been approaching support centres to received help for online harms have pretty much doubled. And so, there is new imperative and new urgency for us to do more to protect those who are victimised online. And, therefore, can the Minister provide more details on how the new law will help address online harms? As I still have time, please allow me to speak in Mandarin. (In Mandarin): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Chairman, going towards a digital economy is a must in Singapore. There are two important factors for success. First, we must continue to make our digital economy green and sustainable; and second, ensure deeper participation from our citizens so they can share the fruits of progress. Based on the second point, we need to ensure that we can build a safe and inclusive digital society where citizens can participate meaningfully in the development of the digital economy with peace of mind. Last year, the GPC tabled a Motion in Parliament, in which we put forward 13 calls for action. I hope the Government can focus on these 13 calls and continue to enhance the overall safety of our digital society. I hope the Minister can update us on these calls. In addition, can we also consider legislation to strengthen the crackdown on harmful behaviours, such as cybercrimes, scams and bullying? I hope the Minister can provide us with more information on this.”
“Hence, can the Minister elaborate on the Government's strategy to balance the growth of our digital infrastructure with our commitment to environmental sustainability? Can we consider having structured programmes to drive the use of energy-efficient algorithms across industries? Can we consider setting more instructive guidelines to advise industries on the preferred type of hardware to be used and standards to adopt when designing software? There is currently one developed by IMDA and Microsoft on software development. Is there scope for such guidelines to be further expanded? Despite the geopolitical sensitivities, what can we learn from DeepSeek's experience as it is considered to be cheaper and greener than other AI models? How will the Government secure more green energy to support a sustainable digital development for Singapore? Lastly, trust is fundamental in a society and underpinning trust in a digital society is to ensure that it is inclusive and safe for all. For a digital future to truly succeed, Singaporeans must be able to enjoy easy access to digital services and participate meaningfully in the digital economy. They should also feel safe when they interact and transact online. To this end, our Government Parliamentary Committee (GPC) for Digital Development and Information moved a Motion in January last year to "reaffirm our commitment to adopt a whole-of-nation approach to sustain trust by building an inclusive and safe digital society". Members discussed the imperatives of ensuring an inclusive and safe digital society and put forth 13 calls to action to achieve this. Could the Minister give an update on what has transpired or implemented since the Motion with these 13 calls to action in January 2024?”
“Singapore ranks first in Asia for digital infrastructure in the recent IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking. This is no easy feat and only possible because of years of careful planning and hard work. So, we must not let up. More importantly, in the digital world, everything runs 24/7. A small failure in our digital infrastructure can cause major disruptions to our economic activities and daily lives. Hence, can the Minister share what measures are being put in place to build up our digital infrastructure further and ensure its resilience and security? I note that the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) released the Advisory Guidelines for cloud service providers and data centres last month to enhance their resilience and security. Can the Minister elaborate on the key measures in these guidelines and how they help operators uplift their resilience and security measures? As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more integrated horizontally and vertically across industries and sectors, as the overall adoption of digital technologies increases, the demand for data centres and higher computing power will increase. Consequently, the demand for energy will also rise exponentially. 12.30 pm Data centres, the backbone of a digital economy, currently consume around 1% to 1.5% of global electricity, a figure that Goldman Sachs Research projects will increase by 50% by 2027 and potentially by up to 165% by 2030 compared to 2023 levels. Training advanced AI models, for instance, can emit a carbon footprint comparable to driving a gasoline-powered vehicle for five to 20 miles per unit of processed text. Therefore, as we embrace digitalisation, we must also accelerate our decarbonisation efforts, enhance energy security and reduce reliance on brown energy.”
“Chairman, I move, "That the total sum to be allocated for Head Q of the Estimates be reduced by $100." Digitalisation is our present reality and an inevitable future. This transformation is not just about technological upgrades, but fundamentally reshaping our society, economy and way of life. It presents vast economic opportunities, promising a better quality of life for future generations. Singapore has always been unafraid of transformations, having pivoted through multiple strategic ones since our Independence. This is especially meaningful given that this is the year of SG60. Our latest push in digitalisation has seen positive results, as our digital economy grew from contributing 13% of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2017 to 17.3% in 2022. Yet, as we pick up the pace in our march towards a digital future, we must also ensure that our digitally-driven growth must be sustainable, inclusive and safe for all. There are several factors that I believe are imperative to a digitally-successful future, namely: world class digital infrastructure, vibrant talent community and ecosystem, widespread adoption by businesses, sustainable and green development, safe and inclusive digital society, and stronger global cooperation. In this opening cut, I will focus on world class digital infrastructure, sustainable and green development as well as safe and inclusive digital society. Singapore has always invested heavily in building up our infrastructure ahead of time so that when the wave arrives, we are ready to ride it. Underpinning our digital growth must, therefore, be enabled by high-performing, resilient and secure digital infrastructure, which includes broadband networks, cloud services, data centres and high-performance computing power.”
“Because from the report, I feel a bit worried – are we going to hammer them too much? Because that may not be sending the right signal to the broader Public Service as well. Lastly, which pertains to a question that I had asked as a supplementary question during the previous Sitting. Given that there are still enterprises using the NRIC number as authentication, what is the progress of the Government's effort in getting them to rectify this? If this is not the right platform for me to ask this, I will file a question separately.”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. Three questions for the Senior Minister. First, on the incident management. I think there have been useful lessons drawn. In this case, it was shared in the report that the lessons will be disseminated to the broader Public Service. I would like to ask who may be coordinating this for this particular incident. Also, looking ahead, should there be similar incidents or other crisis-type of incidents happening, who will be coordinating the response and making sure that investigations and responses are being done in a timely manner? Because in this case, I think there was a time gap at the beginning, so it allowed a lot of doubts and questions from the public to foment. With digitalisation, information and speculations got worse as a result of that; it did not quite help with that sense of public anxiety. So, I wanted to ask if there would be someone or some body to coordinate this going forward, arising from this incident. Second is that I think quite clearly from the report as well as the questions to and fro so far, there has been no malicious intent, no deliberate wilful inaction or action. It was really everyone trying their best to do what they think is right. As Government business gets more complex, there are so many issues at hand. How do we strike the balance? On the one hand, ensuring that discipline is taken for errors being done and continuing to strengthen public trust, but on the other hand, continuing to encourage public officers to take calculated risks when necessary so that innovations can still happen, so that things can still move forward, and not to always be worried about what ifs and do not do anything at all. I do not think that will serve us well as well. So, how do we balance that?”
“And in doing so, how does the Government see itself partnering private companies, big and small, in achieving these aims? Energy and Decarbonisation”
“The transition to a low-carbon economy, bolstered energy security and an increased supply of green energy are pivotal to sustaining and advancing our digital economy and aspirations. As digital technologies, particularly AI, become more integrated horizontally and vertically across industries and sectors, the demand for data centres and higher computing power will increase. The consequent demand for energy will also rise exponentially. According to the Goldman Sachs Research, global power demand from data centers is projected to increase by 50% by 2027, with a potential rise of up to 165% by 2030 compared to 2023 levels. Such a surge is attributed to the accelerating deployment of AI technologies and proliferation of digital services. 6.45 pm Further, training advanced AI models requires substantial computational power, also leading to heightened energy demands. For example, processing a unit of text in Gen AI models can emit a carbon footprint comparable to driving a gasoline-powered vehicle for five to 20 miles. Hence, integrating green and clean energy sources into the digital economy is crucial. We will also have to diversity our energy sources to guard against geopolitical uncertainties and ensure our energy security. Thus, can MTI update on its measures to transition Singapore to a low-carbon economy, including the decarbonisation of the power sector? How does the Government also intend to leverage our position as a financial hub and robust financial infrastructure to support our transition to a low carbon economy and securing green energy for our future needs? How does the Government plan to more actively participate in the carbon markets and position ourselves as a credible, vibrant, highly liquid and highly connected hub for carbon credit markets?”
“How might our manufacturing sector shape up looking ahead? One way to build resilience is to ensure that trading partners' interests and ours continue to remain aligned. Put bluntly, to deepen their invested interests in us and ours in them. Now that the multilateral trading system is under pressure, how is MTI working to strengthen our trade links with the region and the world? Can MTI provide more details on how we intend to diversify our trading partners amidst the trade tensions, and how Singapore companies can benefit from these partnerships? Growing Our Economy”
“The convergence of geopolitical tensions, the US-China trade war, strategic competition in artificial intelligence (AI), and political realignments are reshaping the global economy, supply chains and technological deployment. Singapore, as a small, open economy, is particularly sensitive to these shifts. The US-China trade war resulted in increased tariffs on approximately $1.4 trillion in imports. The tariffs have disrupted global supply chains, leading to uncertainty and volatility in markets. The rivalry is so strong that the US and China are willing to risk hurting their own economies, and one can imagine small countries like us can become unfortunate collateral damage. Then, there is also the strategic competition in AI, exemplified by China's advancements. Such advancement challenges US technological dominance. This rivalry contributes to geopolitical tensions, influencing global trade policies and economic alliances. I had spoken on this during my Budget Debate speech and will do so again at the Ministry of Digital Development and Information's (MDDI's) Committee of Supply (COS). Singapore's economy relies heavily on global trade and investment. Singapore's manufacturing sector accounts for about 20% of our GDP. This sector relies on the seamless flow of raw materials, components and finished goods across borders. Our deep integration with the global supply chain ensured our economic success but can also make us vulnerable. Therefore, changes in external demand, supply chain reorganisation and shifting geoeconomic landscape will certainly have an outsized impact on our economy and, ultimately, livelihoods of Singaporeans. As such, considering these macro factors and impact, what are MTI's plans to build resilience into our supply chains and manufacturing sector?”
“This treasure trove, which is passed down through generations, played a crucial role during the crisis in our generation, and we have a responsibility to preserve this important national asset for future generations. Secondly, regarding sharing the fruits of economic growth. Social cohesion depends on fair wealth distribution and, with economic growth, we naturally hope to share these achievements with all citizens. The SG60 vouchers are a sincere gesture to Singaporeans. However, I suggest the Government reconsider distributing part of the vouchers in cash, giving people options to save, donate or spend it. (In English): In conclusion, in these uncertain times, we must do all we can to build for the future, while giving assurance to Singaporeans, present and future. With this Budget, it is clear that opportunities will remain, that safety nets exist and that the Singapore story will continue to be one of success and solidarity. So, come what may, I believe we will forge ahead together as one Singapore, for a better tomorrow. With that, I support the Budget.”
“A vibrant economy with opportunities means higher living standards, more meaningful employment opportunities and more fiscal revenue to fund public services and infrastructure. In short, economic growth is not just a country’ s heartbeat; it is the continuation of hope for families and people. Globally, we are in an era of intense geopolitical competition. The intensifying US-China rivalry is reshaping global supply chains, technological ecosystems and economic cooperation. Singapore, as a highly open economy, cannot remain unaffected. Any trade restrictions or technology decoupling will directly impact us. As the saying goes, when elephants fight, the grass gets trampled. Therefore, Singapore must be like bamboo, flexible yet firm, and needs to maintain a manoeuvring space and capability in this complex environment. Domestically, we face our own challenges. An ageing population, low birth rates, high costs of living and workforce transformation amid AI and automation waves are all pressing concerns. Therefore, our leadership and Government must not only address immediate concerns like costs of living but also continue to invest for the future, strengthen foundations and pursue new opportunities. I believe this year's Budget addresses these various aspects comprehensively. However, I have several points to raise. Firstly, regarding putting back the draw on Reserves. Considering this year's fiscal surplus, I would like to again urge the Government to gradually replenish the Reserves used during the pandemic to assist Singaporeans and businesses. I hope that at least some portion of the surplus can be returned to the Reserves. Even if not all at once, I hope it can be gradually returned in future years when there are surpluses.”
“It will thus not be surprising that the competition overspills into the energy space. As a small country, how do we secure sustainable sources of energy while maintaining low carbon emissions? As such, the exploration of nuclear options, hydrogen fuel and regional electricity imports must accelerate to buffer against future geopolitical shocks. Fourth, sharing the fruits of growth. It is important that we continue to share the fruits of our collective labour with Singaporeans. This helps to keep our social compact strong. This gives meaning to why we are pursuing economic growth. This is definitely demonstrated in the many social policies and schemes that our Government introduced or enhanced over the past years and, most definitely, this year. Specific to SG60 vouchers, which is quite unlike the GST or CDC Vouchers that are purposed to address everyday costs and also, in a large part, to help drive business to our micro-SMEs within the heartlands and beyond, it is a special commemorative benefit for Singaporeans age above 21. But given that there are many vouchers already, would MOF reconsider distributing part of it in cash so that individuals can choose to save it, donate it or use it for other legitimate purposes? In Mandarin, please. (In Mandarin): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Mr Speaker, the new year began with a generous Budget. This is a Budget that benefits all Singaporeans. The SG60 vouchers are not just a one-off gesture; they symbolise our economic achievements since Independence. The fruits we enjoy today come from our pioneers' vision and perseverance, the careful stewardship of our successive leaders and the full cooperation of our people. Economic growth is not merely about statistics, nor is it a report card to boast about.”
“These include continued investment into infrastructures, R&D, specific enterprise support, such as the Enterprise Compute Initiative, aiming to help businesses harness the power of game-changing technologies as well as enhanced SkillsFuture schemes and employment credits to empower our workforce to stay employed and keep pace with the latest market demands. Building capabilities and resilience in our people and enterprises is far-sighted and the best way in inoculating ourselves against the possible challenges of our future. That being said, to keep Singapore resilient, I still have a few points to raise. Firstly, on replenishing our Reserves. Given that we had a relatively good fiscal year with surplus, I would like to reiterate my call on the Government to put back into the Reserves what we had taken out during the pandemic. This need not be done at one go, but in tranches over the next few years, whenever we can, will be assuring. This pot of gold accumulated by our forefathers served us well during the crisis of our generation and we owe it to the next generation to restore it whenever we can, if not in full, at least, in part, for the benefit of future generations. Second, strengthening economic resilience. As geopolitical competition continues to intensify, there will be impact on our economic structure, supply chains and even how we deploy technologies. Hence, I hope the Government will continue to build redundancy into our supply chains, foster local tech ecosystems and reduce reliance on external shocks. Third, securing sustainable energy. As a related point, competition between major powers is expected to still escalate in the realm of technology, which, in turn, rely on energy.”
“A continued investment in R&D will anchor our relevance in global supply chains. And, of course, in sustainable energy and climate resilience, something that has been termed as an existential one for us, the Budget's $5 billion top-up to the Future Energy Fund and investments in hydrogen, nuclear and renewable energy sources are forward-thinking steps toward energy security and carbon neutrality. Yet, with these opportunities, we must continue to remain vigilant. Against a dynamic world and widespread digitalisation, Singaporeans today worry about job security, skills obsolescence and whether the Government can continue to have their backs in times of crisis. These concerns, if unaddressed, can fray social cohesion and erode trust in institutions. Hence, not only must we continue to ensure we have the right policies, infrastructure and resources for economic success, we must also continue to build up our people so that they can continue to ride waves. In this budget, we have many measures that address immediate pain points and needs of Singaporeans, mitigating cost of living and costs associated with caring for the old and growing families. These measures are so notable that several commentators wondered if the Government has given a bit too much, but at the same time, together with Budgets over the past many years, we can clearly observe the long-term provisions and strategies that our Government has in place and this is heartening. Hence, I am in favour of the many measures targeted at building up our nation's capabilities.”
“I must say that our Government has put in place a robust system to support our seniors and the entire population for healthcare, subsidies, the three Ms and also, with this budget, we have greater support in terms of the longer-term care, as well as the caregiver home grant support. But more than the financial support that we can give them, it is also us, people within the community, across the nation, through our partners, what can we do to help them to give them that moral support, that human touch that cannot be replaced. So, we need to do our best to keep them healthy. We have Healthier SG, thankfully. We need to help them recover after they become unwell. I know that the hospitals are working with our community partners to follow-up with them on that, but we also need to socially engage with them. And this, beyond our usual grassroots, I think this needs all of us to come in to support them. So, this is just one of the challenges that I can see from my ward, my constituency. And we ourselves are also doing our best to support them. Not only are we mobilising our own fellow neighbours and volunteers, but we also raise funds to put in place schemes to also give them the extra support, like the MacPherson Care Fund, helping them, to give them that assurance that, apart from what the Government is able to offer them, we help them with their medical needs, including dental needs, as well as other areas that they find important to them. With challenges looming large, whether if it is outside of Singapore and inside, opportunities are still abound. For example, in technology and innovation leadership, Singapore is a global leader in semiconductor manufacturing and life sciences, producing over 10% the world's chips and 80% of DNA chips.”
“Just very recently during the Chinese New Year period, I went with my team to visit one of our rental blocks. And at the very last part of my visit, I met an uncle who was living alone. Just about a month or two before that he had a fall, fractured his leg and found it very difficult to move around. He used to be very active, but because of his fracture, his ability of mobility becoming affected, he has been coping up at home. So, even though at the beginning when I knocked on his door, he was still generally positive and joyful and cracked a few jokes with me. But towards the end of that visit, towards the end of our conversation, he broke down in tears. Why? Because he has been feeling so lonely. He felt that his sense of ability, that self-esteem has been debilitating, has been regressing and that fear gripped him. So, when we suddenly came to visit him, even though we have been seeing each other before that, but when we were there at his doorstep, he realised that he has not been forgotten, that there is still someone caring about him. He broke down into tears. So, obviously, we mobilise community resources to support him, to help him, to make sure that he is connected. We also found Befrienders through our community partners to continue to engage him, but this is one of those manifestations of how Singapore could be like with an ageing population, with dwindling family support and, if we do not manage this carefully, we are going to have a lot more seniors who will feel very lonely, isolated and then, the whole psychosocial state of them will be affected. This is our future, so we must avoid this.”
“The intensifying US-China rivalry tests countries around the world in many ways. It is reshaping global supply chains, technology ecosystems and economic partnerships. Singapore, as an open economy, feels these ripple effects. The most recent example is that of DeepSeek. DeepSeek's emergence prompted multifaceted response from the US, ranging from government scrutiny, industry reactions and strategic reassessments. Countries, such as Australia, Canada, Italy, the Netherlands, Taiwan and South Korea, also indicated that they would ban the AI app, citing privacy and security concerns. Then, Singapore came under the spotlight and pressure as the US alleged that DeepSeek got Nvidia chips through Singapore. This issue was clarified in the media and thoroughly discussed in this House last Tuesday, so I will not belabour these points. But what is clear is that Singapore can get caught when major powers contest. If the geopolitical contestation continues to escalate to a point where even breathing the same air becomes offensive to the other party – obviously, I am exaggerating a little bit here – how shall Singapore manage these sensitivities going forward and ensure that our own national survival and interests are served? Then, domestically, we are also not without challenges. An ageing population, low total fertility rate – now, very low, at below one, at 0.97 – high cost of living, these are potent combinations of challenges that we face. In MacPherson, we are a mature estate with a higher than national average proportion of seniors. Over the past many years, I have met with senior residents who are struggling with old age, with having little or no family support as well as the pressures, the worries from having to cope with daily living needs.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, we started we started this year with a generous Budget, one that offers something to everyone. From babies to seniors, from families to enterprises, this Budget addresses immediate needs and prepares for the future. Of special mention is the SG60 vouchers that are to be given up in celebration of our 60 years of Independence. These SG60 vouchers are not handouts. They symbolise the economic progress we have achieved since nation building. Our forefathers sowed the seeds of resilience and foresight, coupled with the careful stewardship by our leaders and, today, we reap those benefits. Two days after the Budget Statement, I did my house visits, went around to visit my residents and shared with them what would be encompassed in the Budget. Many of them have expressed joy and excitement. Seniors, themselves, were also especially heartened to know of the enhanced measures, such as the enhanced CDC Vouchers, the long-term care support and, of course, the SG60 vouchers. They were excited that they now have more support to help them cope with the daily cost of living. Economic growth is not just about statistics or gross domestic product (GDP) percentages. It is about the lives that we touch. It means better standards of living, meaningful employment opportunities and the resources to fund public goods and services. As highlighted in the latest MTI report, Singapore's economy grew by 4.4% last year, with median incomes rising 3.4% above inflation and income inequality reaching its lowest since the year 2000. This is progress. But as history has shown, past success is no guarantee of future prosperity. This bears repeating and remembering. We are operating in a world rife with geopolitical contestations.”
“And from now till then, as the Ministry goes out to engage organisations that are currently using NRIC numbers for authentication, not just for passwords or default passwords but also as default identification, or ID, what is the period of time that the Ministry is looking at to quickly get these organisations to rectify it, so that it would help to alleviate the concerns and anxiety that Singaporeans may have during this period? Thirdly, if NRIC numbers are not meant to be used as an authenticator, then in the past few years, why did the Government not actively go after organisations that have been implementing such practices? Would it be seen as implicitly endorsing this understanding? And lastly, I am glad that there will be a review panel to establish the facts of the matter, but at the same time, I also would like to urge the Government to be fair to the civil servants, especially ACRA in this instance, especially if they had no ill intent. But as a whole-of-Government effort, there is shared responsibility. So, I urge the Government, in the review, to also be fair to the civil servants involved.”
“Thank you. I have a few clarifications. First of all, one of the key issues that we have seen here is the question of, "Has the policy stance changed?" Prior to the introduction of PDPA, Singaporeans were quite comfortable with sharing their NRIC numbers. There were even instances whereby NRIC numbers were published in the papers after a lucky draw result was out. So, that was at the beginning. Then, later, we were cultivated to be sensitised to NRIC numbers, especially in the period of introducing PDPA. So, now, with the latest incident, naturally, Singaporeans will wonder, "Is there a change and why is there a change?" And compounding this was that there was a guideline on the collection and retention of NRIC numbers, as part of the guidelines under PDPA. Shortly after the incident, the guideline was withdrawn from the Internet. So, then the question is: why was this withdrawn? What significance is this action? And, therefore, what kind of message are we sending? That is my first clarification. Secondly, it is now clearly clarified that the NRIC number is personal information and that it has to be dealt with with care. So, beyond a matter of respecting individual preference, Singaporeans are concerned about how this NRIC number can or cannot be used for identity theft or scams, which I know the Minister had addressed it in her Statement. What would be helpful is to share what kind of actions will be put in place to safeguard such information and prevent such misuses. How can Singaporeans be assured further?”