Wan Rizal
Singapore
“Better wages, better welfare and better work prospects. Third, make growth sectors accessible. So, every Singaporean, our youth and our rank-and-file workers, can see, can enter and progress in these opportunities. Mr Speaker, our ambition is not just to remain a global transport hub.”
“Also, the type of support that we provide depends on the prevailing circumstances. Should haj be cancelled or disrupted this year, we will work closely with AMTAS to allow the affected pilgrims to defer to the subsequent haj seasons.”
“Thank you, Chairman. Three clarifications for Senior Minister of State Koh. Senior Minister of State had shared earlier about the NMHO that was established to coordinate multi-agency initiatives.”
“Thus, I seek the Minister's views on: how does the Government plan to strengthen coordination between Ministries, institutes of higher learning and community partners so that this support for youth transition can be implemented more systematically, with measurable outcomes, and help more of our youth enter good jobs in growth sectors?”
“So, my question to the Minister is this: how will MOM measure whether enterprises are redesigning jobs alongside technology adoption? Second, will MOM publish outcome indicators, such as the number of jobs redesigned and wage progression outcomes?”
“Sir, I thank the Senior Minister of State for sharing on the efforts done by MOE and working together with the unions and e2i to support both the teachers and of course, the parents in this process too. I have also raised the concern whereby the teachers are now given extra load to do interim supervisory duties.”
The complete record
Every one of 373 lines we hold for Wan Rizal, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 3 of 8.
“Thank you, Mr Speaker, for your indulgence. Minister, you mentioned the involvement of IMH in these efforts to reduce our vaping issues. We clearly know IMH is very much involved with rehabilitation and cessation programmes too. With this expansion, how will it affect IMH's operational ability, given that we do have many cases of mental health also requiring attention? And especially since we see a surge in youth numbers coming forward, which is a good thing, but it also affects the system. Secondly, are there plans for IMH to design dedicated youth-focused programmes apart from the adult ones, because we know that they respond differently to such therapeutic approaches?”
“Chairman, two questions. One on SCIS and the other is on the community health. On SCIS, I note that the graduates are going through a very good training programme. But can we help by supporting them in their transition to employment? I think it is something that could be helpful. At the same time, while they are actually studying, are there opportunities to strengthen their pathways to employment through internships and industry attachments, ensuring that the curriculum is robust, is aligned to the workforce and they find some meaningful transition in that area? The second is on community health. The JKJU network appears to be very successful and it is a good model for community engagement. Are there plans to expand this network to leverage on the network itself, to better intervene on community health issues and push this idea of preventive health and early intervention within the community?”
“How does the Government ensure that these families continue to receive the best and holistic support, including financial literacy and parenting guidance, even after they exit the programme? Furthermore, with the rising costs of living, are there plans to further expand Project Dian to all other M3@Towns or to enhance the types of assistance provided? Role of Asatizah (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Sir, asatizah not only play a role as religious educators but also provide guidance on social and community matters. Due to the challenges of modern life, many in our community now rely on asatizah, not only for religious knowledge but also for guidance in dealing with social and personal issues. How does the Government support asatizah and further empower their role to carry out their duties more effectively? Are there efforts to provide them with professional training in areas, such as mental health, family counselling and community leadership? Furthermore, what steps are being taken to ensure that religious institutions and authorities like MUIS continue to provide ongoing support and development to the asatizah, so that they remain relevant and able to meet the community’s needs? Finally, how does the Government plan to further empower the role of asatizah in guiding the community, not only in religious aspects but also in building a more resilient, progressive and united community? Progress of Malay/Muslim Community”
“Thank you, Chairman. In Malay, please. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Focus Area 5 (FA5) of M3 on Community Health aims to empower our community to take ownership of their health and adopt a sustainable healthy lifestyle. Can the Minister share what significant improvements we have seen as a result of this FA5? Has there been a reduced risk of chronic diseases, increase in physical activity, or positive changes in eating habits? Besides awareness, long-term behavioral changes require community support. How does the Government collaborate with mosques, grassroots groups and health professionals to ensure these efforts have a lasting impact? What are the plans to extend these efforts to harder-to-reach groups, such as the elderly and low-income families? Beyond that, mental health is also important. Many acknowledge that mental health is something they need to address. What are the special programmes under M3 that support emotional resilience and mental well-being? Project Dian (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Sir, strong families are the bedrock of a resilient society. Project Dian, which was first introduced in 2021, plays an important role in supporting low-income Malay/Muslim families living in rental flats through targeted assistance and community guidance. With its expansion to more M3@Towns in 2023, it is timely to assess its impact and future direction. Can the Government share any update on how Project Dian has improved the well-being of the families involved? Has there been an increase in employment opportunities, financial stability or community support for these families? Long-term progress requires continuous engagement.”
“Could there be clear referral pathways to link religious organisations with professional mental health services? Children's Health and Well-being Madam, children's mental health and well-being is about giving them the best possible start in life, ensuring they grow up healthy, resilient and supported. What happens in childhood shapes lifelong health, including mental well-being. Therefore, we must ensure that the right support structures are in place at home and in the community to help children thrive. Could MOH provide updates on efforts to expand preventative health measures and nutritional support for children? Could MOH provide an update on efforts to strengthen early intervention for children's mental health? And how are Healthier SG initiatives being extended to support early childhood mental wellness? Madam, screens have been perceived as a central part of childhood, which I totally disagree. Unhealthy digital habits can impact mental well-being and physical health as well. How is MOH working to strengthen digital wellness efforts, particularly through resources, like the Parenting for Wellness Toolkit? Madam, investing in our children's health today means a stronger, healthier Singapore tomorrow. Such efforts in mental, digital and physical well-being will ensure that every child grows up with the right foundation for lifelong health. I look forward to MOH's update on these critical areas. 4.15 pm Grow Well SG”
“Madam, with the growing demands for mental health services, how is MOH ensuring that individuals receive help from qualified professionals, not unregulated providers or even those from Carousell? We need to distinguish between psychologists and private counsellors and start considering formal regulations for psychologists and strict consumer protection measures for private counselling services. Could MOH share its stance on this and what are we going to do moving forward? Madam, our youths face barriers with seeking help due to parental consent requirements. Could structured guidance be developed to support both parents and youths in navigating this process. When youths are in crisis, they could end up in Emergency Departments, which are not the best environment for them. Could we explore alternative crisis response spaces designed specifically for youths? A growing demand for these services simply means that we need a well-trained workforce. Could MOH provide updates on efforts to boost training capacity, particularly through the National Competency Framework and psychological first aid for frontline responders? A workplace can either be a source of stress or pillar of support. Some companies have made strikes in supporting employee well-being, but workplace mental health efforts must go beyond talks and campaigns. How can we embed mental health support more deeply into workplaces' policies, whether through structured accommodation, supervisor training or through pathways for employers for mental health-related absences? Madam, I have mentioned about religiosity in mental health support and I ask whether we could provide structured training for them as they engage their congregants.”
“Madam, mental health has been a key focus throughout my time in Parliament. In my first Adjournment Motion in 2020, I introduced the LAST framework: Literacy, Accessibility, Screening and Time-out. I am glad that these four areas are continually addressed. Awareness has grown and more people recognise the importance of mental well-being. However, many who know still hesitate to seek help when they need it. They worry about stigma, who to see or whether their struggles are serious enough to warrant an intervention. There is still much to do. Therefore, we need to strengthen our mental health ecosystem. One that is accessible, professional and safe; one that help seekers not struggle with long wait-times or uncertainty about who and where to go to. With this in mind, I seek MOH's response on several key areas. The National Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy and National Mental Health Office were launched to improve coordination and access to mental health services. How have the reception and adoption of the strategy been so far and what initiatives has the Office undertaken, and what can we expect from the Office moving forward? Madam, mental health support must move into spaces where the people are already there, in community spaces or in youth hubs where the youths are there or even sports facilities. Could more of these spaces be leveraged to provide timely, accessible support? Another space to consider is, of course, the digital space, but such support must be human-led. Oftentimes, I hear help-seekers saying they turn to recorded messages or AI chatbots. Certainly, we can do better. How is MOH ensuring that the digital space outlet remains one that provides real professional human support?”
“Madam, parents play a crucial role in shaping children's mental well-being and resilience. In today's digital age, where young people face increasing stress and online risks, the Parenting for Wellness (PfW) Initiative is a timely effort to equip parents with practical tools and strategies. Could MOE share how the PfW Toolbox for Parents is distributed and how its effectiveness is measured? Are there plans to expand outreach, such as partnering with community groups to better engage parents from diverse backgrounds? Beyond resources, early intervention is key. How will MOE ensure that schools have sufficient support systems and trained personnel to assess mental health risks and intervene effectively? Will there be structured policies to encourage help-seeking while addressing students' concerns about stigma or future repercussions? As we continue to strengthen mental health support for youths, what further steps will MOE take to empower parents to safeguard their children's well-being?”
“Madam, in a dynamic economy, lifelong learning is no longer optional. It is essential. Many mid-career Singaporeans want to upskill and stay competitive, but challenges, such as financial constraints and balancing work and family, remain. Extending the SkillsFuture Mid-Career Training Allowance to part-time programmes is a welcome move. Could MOE share how these programmes are selected and how they align with emerging industry demands? With a 24-month lifetime cap on training allowances, how will MOE support mid-career individuals needing further upskilling beyond this period? Will additional pathways or funding options exist for those in industries undergoing transformation? As we build a culture of continuous learning, what further steps will MOE take to encourage greater participation, especially among lower-income and vulnerable workers? Strengthening Self-employed Persons' (SEPs') Employment Resilience”
“As flexible work arrangements are implemented across schools, how will MOE ensure that there are sufficient teachers, allied educators and administrative staff to support this transition reasonably? Ultimately, how will MOE ensure that technology is used effectively to support our teachers to reduce burnout and focus on nurturing students? More Support for Special Educational Needs' Officers”
“Madam, in a dynamic uncertain world, we need to prepare our learners to be nimble and adaptable. Task education should be flexible, yet responsive to students' diverse interests and aspirations. The polytechnic common entry programmes (CEPs) have expanded significantly, allowing students to explore different fields before selecting a specialisation. With one in four polytechnic students now entering to the CEPs, could MOE share insights on how they have benefitted? Have they gained greater clarity in choosing their specialisation and have retention rates improved? Beyond exploration, how are polytechnics ensuring that such students receive adequate academic and career guidance? Republic Polytechnic will begin offering broad-based diploma options in Academic Year 2025 (AY2025). Could this model be expanded to provide students with an even greater multidisciplinary exposure? 3.30 pm How will MOE continue to enhance CEPs to ensure they remain available pathways for students to build relevant skills for the evolving job market? Teachers' Workload Madam, our teachers are at the heart of our education system, but many are burdened with administrative duties, taking their time away from students. Technology can help streamline these processes, allowing teachers to focus on what truly matters to them – nurturing and guiding our students. The pilot feature on Parents Gateway to digitalise absence submissions is a positive step. Could MOE share the initial feedback from this pilot and how the Ministry plans to ensure a smooth nationwide roll-out? Beyond absence submissions, what other digital solutions are being explored to reduce teachers' workloads?”
“Sir, the Middle East remains a region of both tension and opportunity. Given its dynamic geopolitical landscape, Singapore must stay engaged to safeguard our interests and contribute to regional stability. 5.30 pm Singapore has long maintained good relations with the region. Given the ongoing conflicts and realignments in the area, how is Singapore working to strengthen its diplomatic cooperation with these countries? Beyond bilateral ties, what role can Singapore play in fostering dialogue and multilateral collaboration in areas, such as security, energy and humanitarian assistance? As the Middle East continues to evolve, how will Singapore ensure that our engagement remains relevant, constructive and aligned with our long-term strategic interests?”
“Sir, our MINDEF and SAF museums serve as a key platform to educate Singaporeans on our military history and reinforce the importance of Total Defence. These museums must remain engaging and relevant for future generations as security threats evolve. How is MINDEF leveraging these museums to deepen public understanding of Total Defence, especially beyond military security, such as digital threats and social resilience? Are there efforts to modernise exhibits by incorporating interactive elements, simulations or digital storytelling to enhance learning experiences? Beyond education, these museums can foster stronger connections between the public and MINDEF. Could MINDEF explore initiatives, such as using soldiers for guided tours, to incorporate real-life experiences into the learning process? As Singapore continues to evolve, how will MINDEF ensure that these museums remain dynamic, relevant and impactful in shaping our national defence consciousness? Innovation”
“Sir, the demands of NS go beyond physical endurance – mental resilience is equally critical. Our soldiers face operational stress, regimentation, and the challenges of balancing military life. Ensuring they are psychologically resilient is essential for their well-being and operational readiness. Could MINDEF provide an update on recent efforts to strengthen the mental resilience of our soldiers? How are resilience-building strategies incorporated into training to help our soldiers better manage stress and pressure? Beyond counselling services, are there plans to enhance peer support networks or introduce structured mental wellness programmes within SAF units? Could technology also play a role in providing early mental health interventions? Finally, how will MINDEF continue integrating psychological resilience into SAF training and support structures to ensure our soldiers are mentally strong both during and after their service? OneNS Web Portal”
“Sir, balancing work and family responsibilities is a key concern for many Singaporean parents. As families juggle demanding work schedules and caregiving duties, more substantial support structures are essential to help them manage both effectively. What additional measures is the Government considering to ease caregiving pressures for working parents, especially those with young children? Are there plans to enhance childcare accessibility, parental leave policies or flexible work arrangements (FWAs) to support families better? Beyond workplace policies, how can we strengthen community-based support networks to assist working parents in areas, such as after-school care, parental coaching or peer support groups? As we continue to encourage parenthood while supporting career aspirations, how will the Government ensure that working parents have the resources and flexibility to balance family and work commitments?”
“Nonetheless, I do have just one area to bring up and this is with regard to childcare leave. Could we consider enhancing childcare leave provisions for parents? I acknowledge the positive step taken last year with the increment in Shared Parental Leave. However, childcare leave and parental leave serve different purposes, addressing different needs at different stages of a child's development. Many parents highlight practical difficulties, especially when children take turns falling ill. Enhancing childcare leave specifically would significantly help parents manage these unpredictable and often stressful situations. I certainly have had my share. Sir, in conclusion, this Budget gives us the tools. Still, it is up to each of us, as leaders, communities and individuals, to make the most of them and contribute positively towards a compassionate, inclusive and resilient Singapore. When we uplift our people, strengthen our families and prioritise well-being, we are shaping a Singapore that does not just move forward but thrive together. Sir, I support the Budget.”
“If we want to compete and thrive in an increasingly challenging economy, lifelong learning is no longer an option, but a necessity. I urge our community to view these opportunities as an investment for their future. This is because, by having knowledge and skills that are constantly enhanced, we will not just be able to face challenges, we will be able to master them. (In English): Sir, my final point is on large families. Raising a family is one of my life's greatest joys, but for many parents, it also comes with many financial and logistical challenges. As a father of four, I understand first-hand the rewards and realities of managing household expenses, education and childcare. This Budget recognises and strengthens support for all families, whether they have one child, two children, or more. The increases in CDC Vouchers, rebates and subsidies will benefit families and ease daily expenses. At the same time, I welcome the targeted enhancements that provide additional support for larger families. The introduction of higher Child Development Account top-ups and an enhanced Baby Bonus for the third child and beyond acknowledges the increased financial demands of raising more children. Expanding preschool subsidies for the third child onwards will further help parents manage the cost of early childhood education, ensuring that affordability does not become a barrier to providing a strong start in life. These policies do not take away from families with one or two children. Instead, they reflect the reality that household expenses grow exponentially with each additional child. By ensuring that no family feels financially overstretched, we create a more supportive environment for all parents to raise and nurture their children with confidence.”
“To help Singaporeans transition smoothly into new or higher-paying roles, a comprehensive framework, including better career guidance, structured job placement support and policies to reduce the risks of retraining, is necessary. Could we introduce, what I call a "Lifelong Learning Hack"? It would be a one-stop advisory service to help Singaporeans to map out realistic training-to-employment pathways, ensure that they select the right courses, knowing that they will receive long-term career guidance and assurances. Mr Speaker, in Malay, please. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] This Budget presents various opportunities for all of us, especially in lifelong learning. However, many workers are still hesitant to continue their education. This is not due to a lack of interest, but because of family responsibilities, work commitments, and financial concerns. I myself have faced this dilemma. I left a stable job to continue my studies full-time for two years. After returning to work a few years later, I decided to pursue further studies, also full-time, for five years. It was not an easy journey. Thus, I understand the concerns of those who want to learn but are afraid of any uncertainty that may arise. I understand the challenges. The questions often asked is, is it worth it? Does it really open up better opportunities? But I also know the immense value of lifelong learning, not just in building a career, but also in strengthening personal resilience. The Government has taken positive steps to alleviate these concerns. In this year's Budget, the SkillsFuture Part-Time Training Allowance will be extended to those aged 30 and above, with financial support of $300 per month to cover training costs. Sir, knowledge is the key to progress.”
“To truly thrive in a changing and dynamic world, lifelong learning must be the foundation of our economic future. Yet, while the Budget enhances SkillsFuture funding and support, barriers remain. Many Singaporeans struggle to upskill, not because of a lack of interest, but because of practical realities. Firstly, balancing commitments. Many Singaporeans struggle to pursue further education while juggling family responsibilities and full-time work. The mental and logistical effort required to commit to long-term learning can feel overwhelming, even with financial support. Could we explore more "Earn and Learn" models where training is embedded within current employment, allowing workers to upskill without taking extended breaks from work? Companies could integrate structured training hours into their work schedules, supported by incentives for employers who participate. Second, there is uncertainty of returns. A common concern among mid-career workers is that whether upskilling will lead to better job opportunities or even higher wages. Many hesitate to seek help or take this leap because they fear that leaving a stable job to retrain, only to find that opportunities remain limited or their salaries do not increase. And I have heard those in the new job face a much lower wage because they are starting afresh. We could strengthen career mentorship and placement guarantees, where workers undergoing SkillsFuture-funded retraining receive structured job-matching support. Employers could also be encouraged to guarantee wage progression for workers who complete industry-recognised training. The third is structural barriers. While the Budget provides strong immediate support, long-term success requires more than just training credits.”
“For private counsellors, consumer protection is key. Many operate wellness-focused services outside the medical system. Regulation should ensure transparency and ethical practices and prevent misleading claims so that those seeking help are not exploited. Could we ask that we accelerate discussions on formal registration for psychologists and introduce stronger consumer protection measures for private counselling services because awareness alone is not enough. If we encourage people to seek help, we must also ensure they get the right help. I will expand this further in my COS speech, discussing what we can do to enhance regulation and public safeguards in the mental health space. Beyond healthcare, mental health must be embedded in multiple domains. This is why my colleagues from the PAP Mental Health Group will be raising this issue across Ministries during the Committee of Supply debate. For example, under the Ministry of Defence, we will discuss how we can support our national servicemen (NSFs) and NSmen to receive stronger psychological resilience training and better mental health support. Under MOH and MCCY, we will look at how community health initiatives like HealthierSG and those under M3 Focus Area 5, can deepen engagement in mental health and wellness. Under MSF, MOE and Ministry of Digital Development and Information (MDDI), we will explore how to equip parents to better support their children's and youth's emotional and digital well-being. Also, for interest, is how can we protect teacher well-being. Sir, Budget 2025 is a strategic blueprint that balances relief with long-term economic resilience. Beyond providing short-term relief, this Budget also sends a clear message.”
“The final challenge, Sir, is regards to financial and logistical barriers. We have heard this many times, there are long waiting times for consultations, we have affordability concerns and difficulties in balancing mental health care with work or caregiving responsibilities that deter individuals from taking the first step. Therefore, we must ensure that mental health services remain accessible and affordable for all. What this means is that we need to strengthen our community mental health services, integrate mental healthcare into primary care settings, like Healthier SG, and leverage technology to provide timely and practical support. I will expand on these points in the MOH COS debate. Sir, another growing concern that I read in the papers today was it was reported that unqualified individuals or offering mental health services on online marketplaces like Carousell. These people, with no formal training, provide therapy sessions for a fee. This is deeply troubling. Mental health is not a causal service. It cannot be left unregulated. Vulnerable individuals seeking help must receive qualified ethical and professional support. But we must be precise about the problem. Today, psychiatrists are regulated but psychologists and counsellors are not. While professional bodies exist, registration remains voluntary. However, psychologists and private counsellors play very different roles and our approach to regulation must reflect that. For psychologists, registration is crucial to uphold the professional and ethical standards. Many of them were in clinical settings, diagnosing and treating mental health conditions. Regulation is about protecting patients from harm and ensuring they receive the care from trained professionals.”
“The Government has introduced many online and offline resources, but we can do more to ensure that these resources are well utilised, easily accessible and effective. Perhaps it is time we make Mental Health Literacy mandatory, from schools to workplaces. At the very least, it acts as a simple introduction that could help more people understand this pertinent issue and take that first step towards seeking or providing help. Ultimately, it is up to us to take this step, to practice what we have learned and build a more supportive, understanding community. Sir, in the mental health Motion, I spoke about the role of spirituality. Our religious organisations have a unique ability to shape perspectives, offer guidance and provide safe spaces for open conversations. This can help bridge the stigma around mental health, ensuring that those who are struggling do not suffer in silence, but instead, find comfort and support within their communities. I am glad to share that many religious organisations have taken this step. They have taken up courses, equipping their staff with mental health knowledge, working closely with mental health organisations, like Club HEAL, Silver Ribbon and Social, Emotional and Mental Health. I hope we can do more by creating a structure for them to get easy training and support. Sir, the second challenge that we face on where to seek help. Some are unsure about what support is available, how to access affordable services or whether their concerns are "serious enough" to warrant an intervention. And that is why the PAP Mental Health Group is currently recruiting and training our Mental Health Ambassadors who will be deployed to connect residents who need help to partners within the community.”
“Sir, today, I will speak on three topics close to my heart: mental health, lifelong learning and support for families. Mental health, although not explicitly mentioned in Budget 2025, is directly impacted. By alleviating the financial burden on families and individuals, we reduce stress and anxiety, which are major contributors to mental health issues. By investing in lifelong learning, we empower individuals to develop skills and resilience they need to navigate life's challenges. By supporting large families, we create a strong fabric that provides individuals a sense of belonging and support. And this paves the way for a healthier, more resilient, caring society. Sir, during the Motion on mental health last year, Prime Minister Wong affirmed that mental health is a national priority. The Government has continually demonstrated unwavering commitment to supporting the mental health and wellness of every Singaporean. We have made significant strides in improving awareness, education and public discourse on mental health. The latest study by the Institute of Mental Health shows that 58.9% of Singaporeans can recognise common mental health conditions, as compared to 42.3% previously. However, the study also reveals that many who are aware do not actively seek out for help when they need it. This gap between understanding and action remains a key challenge. But the question is: why? Unfortunately, the number one problem is stigma. Stigma still exists. Although societal attitudes are improving, many still hesitate to reach out due to fear of judgement, particularly in professional or family settings. And that is why we, as a society, must do more to equip ourselves with the mental health literacy.”
“Sir, I thank the Senior Minister of State for his reply. I can hear that ketamine is indeed effective. So, how can we extend this usage of ketamine, knowing that it is actually quite costly, to make it affordable for patients across the board?”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I thank the Minister of State for the reply. I am glad to hear that we are doing things to change the mindset of this perceived idea of the necessity of tuition. Beyond financial concerns, is MOE studying the impact of this tuition culture on students' well-being and stress levels? Such information could be helpful for us to push further a change in this mindset. My next question is really on how I have heard about the financial support for the lower-income families, but I do also note that there are families who are in the middle-income who feel that they need support for their children. Are there measures by MOE to address these issues and concerns by such families?”
“Together, I believe we are driving impactful change and this Bill plays a critical role in shaping that transformation. Mr Speaker, in conclusion, this Bill is more than just a legislation. It is a declaration of our values as a nation. By standing against discrimination and upholding mental health as a national priority, we reaffirm our commitment to fairness, dignity and inclusivity. Together, let us take this important step towards a society where no one feels excluded or undervalued due to their mental health challenges. It sends a clear message: mental health matters and discrimination has no place in our society, and especially in our workplaces.”
“Employers must implement robust confidentiality protocols during investigations or accommodations. As an example, if an HR team inadvertently shares details about an employee's mental health condition with co-workers, it could lead to workplace gossip, further alienating the individual. Clear confidentiality protocols then must be enforced. Sir, beyond these clarifications, this Bill represents a broader cultural shift in how we view mental health in the workplace and in the society. I am encouraged by how this Bill aligns with our broader efforts to strengthen mental health advocacy in Singapore. The Workplace Fairness Bill is not a standalone initiative. It builds on the foundation of community programmes, public awareness campaigns and mental health education. Last year, during the Motion on mental health, the Government affirmed that mental health is a national priority. Therefore, the inclusion of mental health in this Bill underscores that commitment, translating our national vision into actionable policies that directly impact the workplace and beyond. Last Sunday, I had the opportunity through the People's Action Party (PAP) Mental Health Group to hold its first meet-up session of 2025, bringing together passionate individuals and organisations that are dedicated in advancing mental health initiative. Some of them include Silver Ribbon (Singapore), SCMH, Calm Collective, Campus Psy, Limitless, Growthbeans and many more. During our discussions, the Workplace Fairness Bill featured prominently as a key legislative step that aligns with our shared vision of creating a healthier, more inclusive workplace. It is inspiring to see so many shared aspirations among the community to make mental health a national priority.”
“I ask simply because employers, especially SMEs, might lack the resources or expertise to set up impartial grievance system. External oversight could ensure fairness and accountability. As an example, if an employee files a complaint against their manager and, because it is an SME, the same manager may oversee the grievance process and this creates a clear conflict of interest. Thus, we need to establish independent reviews to mitigate such concerns. How also will this Bill protect employees from subtle forms of retaliation after they raise a mental health related grievance? Employees often fear indirect retaliation, such as being excluded from promotions or sidelined in projects, even if overt discrimination is addressed. I ask simply because subtle retaliation is harder to detect and prove, making robust protections vital. The Bill explicitly prohibits such acts and provides penalties for violations. As an example, an employee who discloses that he or she may have post-traumatic stress disorder and subsequently notices a drop in their responsibilities despite consistent performance, might suspect retaliation. Employers must demonstrate that such changes are justified and not punitive. My fourth point is regarding privacy and confidentiality. What safeguards ensure that employees' mental health information remains confidential during the grievance investigations or workplace discussions. Breaches of privacy could discourage employees from disclosing their conditions, and we want them to come forward, but this may undermine the Bill's intent. I ask simply because sensitive information about mental health must be handled carefully to avoid stigma and protect employees' dignity.”
“What diagnostic criteria or medical certifications are required for a mental health condition to qualify as a protected characteristic? Employers and employees need clarity to avoid disputes over whether a condition is eligible for protection. I ask because mental health conditions vary significantly from chronic disorders like schizophrenia, to temporary conditions such as acute stress. Without a clear criteria, confusion or inconsistencies could arise. As an example, an employee with an anxiety might present a certificate from a general practitioner, while any other with a similar condition may seek a psychiatrist diagnosis. Ensuring clarity in what is accepted is crucial to avoid unfair outcomes. Second revolves around balancing safety and fairness. How can employers assess whether a mental health condition genuinely affects an employee's ability to perform safety critical roles? Employers must navigate a fine line between ensuring workplace safety and avoiding discrimination. I ask simply because certain industries, for example, in aviation or healthcare, or even construction, may involve high risk tasks where safety concerns are paramount. Employers need clear guidance or guidelines to make balanced and reasonable decisions. As an example, we can have a construction worker who has severe anxiety and might require temporary re-assignment to lower-risk duties. The Bill ensures such decisions are grounded in genuine safety concerns rather than bias. The third revolves around the grievance processes and retaliation. The question is, what mechanisms are in place to ensure grievance handling processes are unbiased and transparent. Employees may mistrust internal process if they are entirely employer driven, undermining the Bill's intent.”
“Mr Speaker, I rise in support of the Bill, particularly its provisions on mental health. The Bill signifies a significant step towards ensuring that our workplaces are not only productive but also inclusive, compassionate and fair. Sir, mental health remains as a pertinent topic. One in seven individuals in Singapore experience mental health challenges in their lifetime. In the workplace, this often translates to stigma, reduced opportunities and hesitance to seek help. Beyond the personal toll, mental health issues have a significant economic impact. Research by Duke-NUS Medical School and the Institute of Mental Health estimates that anxiety and depression alone cost Singapore’s economy approximately 2.9% of gross domestic product annually, translating to a staggering S$16 billion in productivity losses. Such barriers affect individuals and hinder workforce morale, efficiency and overall economic growth. Therefore, addressing mental health in the workplace is a moral responsibility and an economic imperative. The Bill addresses these gaps by recognising mental health conditions as a protected characteristic. Employers are prohibited from making adverse decisions based on an employee’s mental health status, whether during hiring, promotions or dismissals. It requires that grievance processes be established to ensure employees can report discrimination without fear of retaliation. These measures create a much-needed safety net for workers, encouraging equitable treatment and reducing stigma. However, Sir, I do have some concerns and questions about the Bill, particularly regarding our mental health provisions. Firstly, these concerns revolve around the definitions of mental health conditions.”
“These employees are the foundation of CDA's operations and their welfare should remain a top priority to ensure a smooth transition and continued excellence in public health services. Finally, on international representation. The Bill empowers CDA to represent Singapore internationally on matters related to infectious diseases. This international engagement is crucial for fostering global partnerships and ensuring our policies are aligned with best practices worldwide. During the pandemic, a multi-agency task force was set up to coordinate responses across various sectors. How will CDA's international engagement impact or complement such multi-agency efforts? To avoid overlap or misalignment with existing strategies, could the Ministry clarify how CDA's international engagements will complement ongoing work by MOH and other agencies? Could the Ministry also share the specific coordination mechanisms that will be established to ensure streamlined communication and unified representation on the global stage? Such protocols will enhance our credibility and effectiveness in global health matters. Mr Speaker, in closing, CDA represents a significant step in enhancing our public health infrastructure. The establishment of CDA offers an opportunity to not only strengthen our infectious diseases management capabilities but also reaffirm our commitment to transparency, accountability and the welfare of those who will serve in this critical agency. Let us take a moment to acknowledge the dedication of our healthcare workers who have tirelessly protected our nation. Their resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic exemplifies the spirit we aim to preserve and enhance with CDA. Notwithstanding the clarifications raised, I support the Bill.”
“What systems will be implemented to ensure CDA operates transparently and is held accountable for its decisions and use of public funds? Secondly, will CDA be required to publish regular performance reviews, financial audits and annual reports for public scrutiny? Public trust in CDA is paramount, especially when it is new and these measures will go a long way to ensure accountability and trust. Third, on budget allocation and resource prioritisation. CDA's broad mandate raises important questions about the prioritisation of its resources. Balancing immediate needs with long-term growth is critical. I would like to ask: how will the Ministry ensure that CDA allocates resources effectively to meet both immediate outbreak responses and long-term objectives, such as vaccine research and public health education? Could the Ministry provide an outline of its initial funding allocations and provide for CDA to align public expectations with operational realities. Effective resource management will be critical to the success of this agency and clarity in this regard will help in aligning public expectations with operational realities. Fourth, on employee welfare and transition. I also wish to highlight the importance of protecting the welfare of employees who will be transferred from MOH and HPB to CDA. Our healthcare workers have been instrumental in safeguarding our nation's health, especially during the pandemic. Beyond the assurances provided in the Bill, what steps will the Ministry take to address long-term concerns around career progression, job security, work benefits and the morale of these employees? Will there be a structured consultation process to address employees' concerns during this transition?”
“Mr Speaker, I rise in support of the Bill. The Bill represents a significant step in strengthening our nation's capabilities to prevent, manage and control infectious diseases. Its importance is underscored by the growing complexity of global health challenges as we saw during the COVID-19 pandemic and the ongoing need to combat diseases, like dengue and influenza. During COVID-19, for instance, the rapid spread of the virus and the pressure on our healthcare system highlighted the critical need for a robust, centralised agency to manage such crises effectively. The Bill aims to establish CDA, a centralised body coordinating infectious disease management, research, surveillance and public health education. While I fully support the intent behind this Bill, I would like to raise some questions and seek clarification on key provisions. First, I would like to address the potential impact of this transition on our existing public health services. The transfer of functions from MOH and HPB to CDA is a significant organisational shift. What measures will the Ministry put in place to ensure that critical services, such as vaccination programmes, epidemiological studies and disease monitoring, continue seamlessly during this period of change? Can the Ministry share a detailed transition plan to mitigate any disruptions or any risks of disruptions? These services are the backbone of our public health framework and any gaps, even temporary ones, could have severe implications for our citizens' health and well-being. Second, on transparency and accountability. The Bill outlines broad powers for CDA, including managing significant resources and overseeing critical public health functions. Transparency will be essential for maintaining public health in this new agency.”
“Additionally, I also urge us to address workplace stigma against parents who take extended leave to care for their children. Recently, M3@Jalan Besar launched the Malay Men's Mental Health Peer Support Group (3MH) a peer support group specifically designed to support the mental health of men in the Malay/Muslim community. Initiatives like this are crucial to ensure that fathers also receive the emotional and mental support that they need for the sake of their families’ well-being. By providing a more comprehensive support, we can build a more family-friendly work culture and ensure the mental well-being of parents and children. Overall, this Bill is a positive step towards building a more caring society that support families in Singapore. (In English): Mr Speaker, the Bill represents a significant step forward in building a more supportive and inclusive Singapore for our families. By enhancing parental leave options, expanding eligibility and providing greater financial security for parents, especially those in self-employment or dual employment, we are not only supporting individual families, but also reinforcing the values that underpin our society. As we look to the future, our policies must continue to evolve with the changing needs of our families and workplaces. By promoting family well-being, mental health and inclusivity, these amendments support stronger family bonds and a more resilient society. These changes will foster stronger family bonds, encourage shared caregiving responsibilities and ultimately, contribute to a more resilient and cohesive society. Notwithstanding the concerns raised, I support the Bill.”
“Together, they could develop public campaigns, resources and workplace programmes that highlight the benefits of shared caregiving, fostering a culture where parental responsibilities are seen as integral to a balanced life. Sir, I would also like to suggest that the Government consider increasing the number of childcare leave days for parents. At present, the six-day childcare leave entitlement is helpful, yet it may fall short, for parents with multiple children or for those who face frequent health or school-related demands. An increase in childcare leave would greatly support families with greater caregiving responsibilities. Sufficient leave reduces stress on parents, benefiting their mental health and allowing them to be more present and engaged with their children. Early childhood is a vital stage of development and a supportive environment promotes mental well-being for both parents and children. One approach could be a tiered system that increases leave days based on the number of children, or a pool of flexible family leave days that parents could use as needed. Expanding childcare leave would further reinforce Singapore's family-friendly framework and support the well-being of all children. Mr Speaker, in Malay, please. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Sir, this Bill aims to strengthen support for families. The proposed amendments will introduce a shared parental leave scheme, provide financial assistance to self-employed parents and offer flexibility to families in different employment situations. However, I would like to highlight several concerns from the community. Firstly, the potential financial burden faced by SMEs in meeting these new demands, especially in terms of costs and administration.”
“Training sessions or resource kits would also be valuable, helping smaller businesses understand and implement family-friendly policies effectively. These measures would enable SMEs to meet their family support obligations without undue strain, balancing their business needs with their contributions to a more family-friendly Singapore. Second, Sir, is about addressing workplace stigma associated with parental leave, like I mentioned earlier in my introduction. Another concern that several parents have shared is the lingering stigma or perception of workplace penalties for those who take extended parental leave. Despite our progress in building family-friendly workplaces, many parents still feel apprehensive about using their leave entitlements due to fears about career impact. This is especially true for new fathers, who may worry that taking shared leave could signal less commitment to their roles, and for mothers, who may fear that extended leave could limit career opportunities. While I support the Government's emphasis on protections for employees and penalties for non-compliance, I also hope that we, as a society, can foster a cultural shift that normalises caregiving for both parents. To address this stigma, I suggest that the Government work closely with NTUC and community organisations such as Dads for Life and Mums for Life to promote a positive culture around parenting. These organisations have been instrumental in encouraging active parenting, and by partnering with them, we can amplify messages that normalise parental leave for both mothers and fathers.”
“The proposed amendments introduce key updates to the existing framework, aimed at increasing support for working parents, expanding options for parental leave and extending coverage to diverse family structures. Notably, the introduction of the SPL scheme marks a significant step forward in promoting more equitable caregiving roles for mothers and fathers. We are seeing a growing desire for shared responsibilities in parenting, as we heard earlier, and this Bill empowers both parents to play a proactive role in their child's formative years. Furthermore, this amendment Bill recognises Singapore's changing work environment. With the rise in self-employment and concurrent employment arrangements, it is essential that our family support policies adapt. Thus, this Bill provides income loss compensation for self-employed parents and accommodates unique scenarios like dual employment, ensuring no family is left behind. Mr Speaker, while I support the Bill, I wish to share some key concerns raised by my constituents. One primary concern among SMEs is the potential financial and operational burden these changes may introduce. SMEs face unique challenges in maintaining workforce continuity, especially with increased leave entitlements. To support SMEs in fulfilling these commitments, I ask that the Government consider several measures, including subsidised administrative support, a dedicated helpline or advisory service, and a streamlined reimbursement process for parental leave. Additionally, regular check-ins and a feedback mechanism with SME representatives could help identify implementation challenges early, while temporary financial assistance during the transition period would ease initial burdens.”
“Mr Speaker, I rise in support of the Bill. Mr Speaker, as a father of four, I am deeply appreciative of the Government's efforts to support parents through this Bill. Although my children are now older and I do not think I will revisit that phase again, I am heartened to see that these changes will benefit future generations of parents. When my children were born, I was fortunate to be on leave, as I was pursuing my studies, first my degree, then after that my PhD. This allowed me be fully present during those formative years, allowing my wife to recuperate while I looked after the children together with her – something that I am grateful for to this day. I did not have to worry about missing and catching up on work although I did have exams and I had multiple assignments to submit as well as reports. But nothing beats the stigma of taking leave and thinking that your colleagues will take the heavy burden of your work. This Bill by expanding parental leave and supporting working parents will provide similar opportunities for countless families in Singapore. It re-affirms our commitment to a society where parents have the time they need to support their children during the crucial early years. I am grateful that we are moving tin this direction and I look forward t seeing the positive impact these changes will bring to all Singaporean families. The Bill reflects our steadfast commitment to fostering a supportive and inclusive environment for Singapore. It is part of our broader vision to encourage family formation and build a society where parents, regardless of their work situation, can balance family life with professional responsibilities.”
“By establishing clear coverage criteria, conducting regular financial reviews and exploring sustainable ways to include essential mental health services, we can safeguard MediShield Life's long-term viability. Notwithstanding the concerns I raised earlier, I truly believe MediShield Life can continue to be a source of peace of mind for every Singaporean, supporting a healthier, more resilient society.”
“As the demand for mental health grows, I encourage the Ministry to consider ways to sustainably include essential mental health treatments in MediShield Life's coverage. Addressing mental health needs is critical to holistic care. By exploring financial sustainability options, we can ensure MediShield Life continues to evolve with our society's needs. Expanding coverage thoughtfully and sustainably will allow MediShield Life to remain a robust healthcare safety net that provides affordable, reliable and essential care to all Singaporeans. Mr Deputy Speaker, in Malay, please. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Sir, this MediShield Life (Amendment) Bill aims to expand MediShield Life coverage to meet the ever-increasing healthcare needs of Singaporeans. With this revision, MediShield Life will be able to approve medical institutions and services that are eligible for coverage under this scheme. However, in our effort to expand this coverage, it is crucial for us to ensure the financial sustainability of the MediShield Life scheme, so that premiums remain affordable for all citizens. I have proposed three key steps to achieve this goal: firstly, establishing clear criteria for essential services; secondly, implementing regular financial reviews; and thirdly, considering sustainable ways to include mental health services in MediShield Life. With these measures, MediShield Life will continue to be an affordable, reliable and relevant healthcare safety net for all Singaporeans. (In English): Mr Deputy Speaker, in conclusion, I support the Ministry's efforts to keep MediShield Life responsive to Singaporeans' healthcare needs. However, we must ensure that these amendments are implemented with financial prudence.”
“While the current amendments allow for the inclusion of more institutions and services, I ask the Ministry to consider mental health services within MediShield Life in future evaluations, especially as demands for these services grow. As the demands for these varied and sometimes high-cost services grow, we must consider how MediShield Life can responsibly support new healthcare needs, including mental health, while maintaining the scheme's financial sustainability. For instance, including private hospitals offering specialised treatments, such as advanced cancer therapies, could lead to high demand and increased claims under MediShield Life. Without careful oversight, a surge in claims could increase premiums for all insured members, affecting affordability. To address these challenges and safeguard MediShield Life's financial sustainability, I urge the Ministry to consider three key measures. Firstly, to establish clear criteria for essential coverage, defining essential versus optional coverage within MediShield Life will help manage costs. By prioritising treatments that benefit the majority, we can ensure that resources are used effectively, preserving MediShield Life's affordability and accessibility. Secondly, implement regular financial reviews. Regular reviews of MediShield Life's financial performance, especially concerning new services and approved institutions, would enable us to make timely adjustments. These reviews could act as an early warning system, identifying areas where costs may rise unsustainably and allowing for targeted measures to keep premiums stable. Thirdly, is to explore sustainable mental health coverage.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, I rise in support of the Bill. MediShield Life has become an indispensable pillar of Singapore's healthcare system, providing critical coverage that ensures no Singaporean is left without access to essential medical treatment. This amendment Bill seeks to modernise and expand MediShield Life to meet the evolving healthcare needs. I commend the Ministry for its proactive efforts, especially, given today's complex and dynamic healthcare landscape. Today, I would like to focus on just one critical issue raised by these amendments: the impact on financial sustainability of MediShield Life. Sir, the amendments in this Bill allow for more flexibility in approving institutions and services for MediShield Life coverage. This flexibility can increase access to necessary treatments and provide coverage for services that better meet patients' changing healthcare needs. However, with this expansion comes the responsibility to carefully manage costs, ensuring that the scheme remains sustainable and the premiums remain affordable for all insured persons. In recent years, we have seen significant growth in the scope of medical services in Singapore. This includes expanding telemedicine and digital health services, which offer accessible options like remote consultations and monitoring. Advanced treatments in areas like oncology and personalised medicine are also available, but often come at a high cost. Additionally, the importance of mental health has become increasingly apparent and pertinent, and there is a growing need for affordable mental health services within our healthcare framework.”
“Sir, I thank the Minister for sharing on this issue on the MaNaDr. I do believe quality assurance mechanisms are important. In that regard, how does the Ministry currently assess the quality of telehealth consultations? Are there metrics or periodic audits in place to monitor performance? And are these criteria laid out specifically to all these telemedicine providers? The other question I have, Sir, is really on patient feedback. I have had students who used telemedicine as the form of them getting a medical certificate (MC) in school; and sometimes, I do hear they have complaints and feedback. Could the Minister share if there are specific feedback mechanisms or complaint channels in place for telehealth services and how patients' concerns are addressed within this framework?”
“As we look to the future, let us continue to adapt and evolve our laws to meet the challenges of the digital age. What seems like science fiction today could be a reality in the next election. While this Bill tackles AI-generated deepfakes and manipulated content, we must remain vigilant for new technologies that could be used to distort electoral processes. We must also collectively, as a society, be able to identify and reject misinformation and deepfakes. With this Bill, we reaffirm our commitment to a fair, transparent and trustworthy electoral system for all Singaporeans. Notwithstanding the concerns and clarifications raised, Sir, I support the Bill.”
“Will there be dedicated resources or teams to monitor and enforce these regulations in real time and on time? Given that technology moves very rapidly, how are the tools used updated accordingly? Clearly, a swift response is crucial. Sir, another important aspect of this Bill that I welcome is social media platforms' increased responsibility. These platforms are not just passive conduits of information. They are potent actors in shaping public opinion. By holding them accountable and imposing penalties up to $1 million for failing to act on corrective directions, we ensure that platforms share in the responsibility for maintaining electoral integrity. But then again, is $1 million fine truly fair or enough across the board? Platforms vary significantly in size and influence, some wielding far more power than others. Should they all be held to the same standard or should penalties scale according to their reach? What happens if a platform takes too long to respond? What qualifies as "long enough" in this context? These are questions we must carefully consider as we strive for effective and fair enforcement. Finally, Sir, I hope that the Minister considers a tougher stance against perpetrators beyond the corrective directions, given that misinformation and the loss of reputation would not only affect the candidate but their family, their loved ones and even their jobs. The mental impact can never be underestimated. Sir, in conclusion, the Bill is a critical step in protecting the integrity of our electoral process in this digital age. It addresses the growing threat of digitally-manipulated content, reinforces accountability for candidates and platforms and ensures that our democracy remains a place of truth and informed choice.”
“Sir, I am grateful that the Minister shared some useful examples earlier, but, next is, how do we communicate this clearly to the public? Could the Ministry provide consistent and fair enforcement guidelines? It is also worth noting that some of the most concerning platforms, such as WhatsApp and Telegram, operate through private, encrypted messaging systems. In fact, in Telegram, they do not even have to share their numbers. These platforms allow information to spread rapidly through group chats, yet they remain largely outside the scope of regulatory control due to their private nature. At this juncture, we need to clarify that it is okay to chat and discuss about politics but wrong to spread deepfakes and misinformation. This raises important questions. How can we effectively curtail the spread of misinformation on platforms where content is shielded by encryption? Should these platforms bear the same responsibility as public social media platforms? Sir, in India, they provide an interesting model with their Deepfakes Analysis Unit, which allows the public to submit questionable content via WhatsApp for rapid verification. Such an initiative could empower Singaporeans to take an active role in reporting misinformation, especially on platforms that are difficult to monitor. By creating a similar content verification channel, we could involve the public more directly in efforts to counter disinformation, ensuring quicker identification and resolution of misleading content circulating on encrypted platforms. Additionally, I would like to ask how the Government plans to manage the volume of manipulated online content that could be generated during election periods?”
“In 2020, a manipulated video of then-Belgian Prime Minister Sophie Wilmès, falsely depicted her blaming environmental damage for the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the video was quickly debunked, it spread widely online, illustrating how rapidly deepfakes can mislead the public before the truth emerges. Similarly, during the 2023 Slovak elections, which the Minister mentioned earlier, AI-generated videos spread across platforms, like Facebook and Telegram, which include falsely depicting a candidate discussing vote buying. Such incidents highlight the urgent need to protect our elections. Sir, we must also recognise the delicate balance this Bill attempts to strike. As with any legislation that governs speech and expression, there is always the concern that it could be perceived as going too far. We do not want this Bill to be perceived as inadvertently stifling legitimate debates. Therefore, I am pleased that the Bill exempts private communications and news reporting by authorised agencies. I am also glad that candidates have the right to defend themselves against false content. However, we must also be mindful of the potential for abuse. The corrective request system should not be exploited. Therefore, robust mechanisms must be in place to ensure that only genuine, harmful misinformation is targeted and frivolous complaints are filtered out. Sir, while I fully support the Bill, I would like to highlight a few areas where further clarity might be necessary. First, there is the issue of determining what qualifies as a "realistic enough" representation to be considered misleading. The subjective nature of this standard could lead to difficulties in enforcement.”
“Mr Speaker, I rise in support of the Bill. It is timely and necessary in an era when technology rapidly transforms how we live, engage with and consume information. Our democracy thrives on citizens' informed choices, which can only be made when voters access accurate, reliable information. In recent years, we have witnessed how digital platforms have become powerful tools for political engagement. These platforms are integral to modern elections, from campaign advertisements to social media debates. However, with this shift comes the darker side – misinformation, deepfakes and digitally manipulated content designed to deceive and mislead voters. This Bill is essential to safeguard against such threats by prohibiting the publication of realistic but false representations, particularly those manipulated through GenAI. Voters must cast ballots based on truth, not illusions. Sir, GenAI is a remarkable technology with transformative potential industries from healthcare and education. But like any powerful tool, it can be misused. This Bill specifically addresses the risk posed by AI-generated deepfakes, audio or visual content that can make it appear that a candidate said or did something they never did. Imagine the harm caused by a manipulated video showing a candidate making a statement they never uttered, such as endorsing a controversial policy. If not swiftly addressed, such a video could spread like wildfire across social media, reaching thousands within minutes and distorting public perception before the truth has a chance to catch up. In the digital world, the truth often struggles to keep pace with lies and by the time the damage is corrected, the harm is usually irreversible.”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I would like to thank the Minister for sharing on the efforts in trying to tackle bullying in schools. While it is reassuring to hear the efforts that we have made to equip teachers in schools with the tools to manage bullying, the recent cases of both physical and psychological bullying highlight the need for us to have continuous evaluation. The long-lasting emotional impact on victims is vital to ensure schools have adequate resources to address these challenges effectively. Furthermore, the detection and reporting processes must remain robust to prevent unreported cases from escalating. Over the years, I have seen students who have been bullied, but they are afraid to come forward, simply because of the retaliation. With that, I would like to ask the following supplementary questions. Firstly, could the Minister provide more details on how it evaluates the effectiveness of the teacher training in detecting unreported cases of bullying, especially psychological and online bullying? How does the Ministry ensure that schools maintain an adequate ratio of counsellors to support students, particularly those schools that may have a higher incidence of bullying? And finally, what are some considerations that the Ministry would take before anti-bullying policies are being reviewed to ensure continued relevance and effectiveness?”
“Will do. Sir, my first supplementary question will be on the Family Nexus. There are Family Nexus sites already established. What considerations would the Ministry take into account when wanting to expand to other regions? I believe there are other regions which would also like to have these services. So, that is the first question. The second question is about the usage of screen time. This is something that came up very strongly in the paper and there are only guidelines. Are there plans for the Ministry to consider making it into legislation, where we can limit the usage of these devices for children? Sir, the third question I have is regarding the concerning rates of childhood obesity. Although we want to address obesity on its own, I remember back then that when we talked about obesity, a group of students in schools usually are sidelined. As we address this issue, I was wondering how we could better manage this situation so that we do not segregate this community too much where the children themselves are being targeted for being obese.”