Yip Hon Weng
Singapore
“But we must also keep building our trust. It is the only infrastructure a small country cannot afford to lose. Every generation since Independence has earned our place in the world. Our responsibility is to see that the next generation is given the chance to do the same.”
“It can reinforce Singapore's role as a trusted financial centre, a gateway to Asia and a platform for long-term growth. But at the end of the day, we should also be clear about how success will be measured in practical terms. How much incremental daily trading volume are we seeking to generate?”
“I thank the Minister of State for his reply. While the US dollar remains dominant, some economists have suggested that the global monetary system may gradually become more fragmented and multi-polar over time.”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I thank the Minister for his reply. Given reports that some firms are slowing workforce expansion due to cost pressures due to the situation in the Middle East, has MOM observed any corresponding shift in firms hiring preferences between local workers and our foreign workforce?”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I thank the Minister of State for her reply. Many Singaporeans are already facing rising premiums year after year. As we have seen recently, even with cheaper riders, base premiums continue increasing. So, households may still have to pay more overall.”
“Because this is not just a technology transition, it is a workforce transition. The establishment of the Tripartite Jobs Council is an important step in ensuring that this alignment happens in practice. Technology will move. Markets will adapt. But we must be clear about the future we are building.”
The complete record
Every one of 873 lines we hold for Yip Hon Weng, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 8 of 18.
“Increased Government control might inadvertently lead to consolidation, with larger firms potentially absorbing smaller ones. While some consolidation might be inevitable, we need to ensure that the Bill does not create an environment where smaller firms struggle to compete under stricter regulations. Thus, it is crucial to explore how the Bill can be structured to ensure a healthy level of competition within the critical transport sector. A competitive landscape fosters innovation and keeps costs in check. We do not want the Bill to inadvertently create monopolies or duopolies that could preclude innovation and, ultimately, raise costs for consumers. Will Singaporeans have to pay more for public transportation as a result? Fourth, Mr Deputy Speaker, concerns remain about transparency and the appeal process. The Bill grants the Minister for Transport broad powers to intervene in critical firms. While national security is paramount, how will transparency be ensured around these interventions? What is the process for appealing decisions made by the relevant authorities under the Bill? Is there an independent body that can review Ministerial decisions or decisions by the authorities? Additionally, the Bill needs to clearly define the circumstances that will justify the Minister intervening in the operations of a critical transport firm. What specific circumstances would trigger such intervention and how would such Ministerial intervention be carried out in a transparent and accountable manner? What safeguards are in place to prevent the Minister from abusing these powers? Fifth, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Bill's impact on our global standing needs careful consideration. Singapore's position as a major transportation hub cannot be overstated.”
“For instance, clause 6 of the Bill mandates prior written approval from LTA for seemingly basic actions like becoming a partner in a Class 1 operating licence holding partnership. Even managerial appointments require LTA's approval. This raises concerns about the intent of Government reach in personnel decisions. Does this hinder a company's ability to function as a truly private entity, considering that even CEO and board appointments require agency approval? Will such overarching Government involvement in the appointment of personnel affect the ability of such companies in attracting talent? Will our companies risk losing talent because of the time lag or the need for approval sought to appoint them? Global and even local talent can easily find appointment in jurisdictions with less red tape. The Bill's agency approval process for acquiring and liquidating shares has potential implications for stock trading of these companies. The potential time delays associated with approvals could hinder stock exchange activities and impact profitability, potentially leading to financial losses. We need to ensure that this Bill does not create unnecessary obstacles. In this regard, it would be helpful if the Government could provide a clear picture of the compliance costs associated with this Bill. Are there ways to minimise the burden on businesses while still achieving the desired security outcomes? How will this Bill affect operations in the bus contracting model in attracting companies to bid as their appointments would come under scrutiny? Can the Government provide a timeline for the approval process for manpower? Third, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, another key concern is the potential impact on competition within the transport sector.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, before I begin, I declare I am working in an investment firm that has investments in the transportation sector in Singapore. There can be no doubt our transportation sector is the lifeblood of Singapore's economy. The disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing regional conflicts highlight the importance of ensuring its resilience. While increased controls are critical, it is important to understand how they might impact certain areas. In this regard, I would like to seek some clarifications on the Bill's potential impact. First, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, can we achieve the goal of strengthening security measures, without stifling innovation within these critical firms? Singapore has a strong reputation for being a hub for innovation. We want our transport sector to be at the forefront of pioneering new technologies like autonomous vehicles, green transportation solutions and logistical optimisation. Therefore, I believe that it is crucial to explore ways to amend this Bill to strike a balance between security and innovation. Can we create a framework that allows these critical firms to flourish while safeguarding our national interests? Second, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we need to consider the potential impact on businesses. The Bill proposes a new designated entities regime. This includes increased Government oversight for critical transport firms. How will this regime affect the day-to-day operations of these critical firms? Will they face significant disruptions or bureaucratic hurdles? Furthermore, is there a concern that the additional regulatory burden could discourage foreign investment or hinder the growth of local firms?”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I thank the Senior Parliamentary Secretary for her response. I have two supplementary questions. Can the Ministry elaborate on any plans to involve youth representatives or youth-led organisations in the development and implementation of anti-vaping campaigns on social media, ensuring that the message is relevant as well as relatable to the target audience? Secondly, given the constantly changing and evolving nature of social media platforms and online trends, how does the Ministry adapt its strategy to remain effective in reaching out to youths, particularly considering the rapid proliferation of new vaping products as well as marketing tactics?”
“With careful consideration and a commitment to innovation, we can ensure Singapore remains a secure and thriving digital hub. I support the Bill.”
“In conclusion, Mr Speaker, Sir, in addressing the proposed amendments to the Cybersecurity Act, I have made several clarifications in my speech. It is imperative that we strike a delicate balance between fortifying our national cybersecurity stance and mitigating undue burdens on businesses, especially smaller enterprises with limited resources. Delving into industry concerns about the cost of compliance, is critical to understand the specific financial implications across different business sizes and sectors to ensure transparency and sustainability. Additionally, providing clear guidance and support, particularly for SMEs, is essential to navigate the new requirements effectively. Furthermore, fostering innovation must remain a priority alongside cybersecurity enhancements. While acknowledging the importance of leveraging new technologies in maintaining Singapore's competitive edge, it is equally critical to ensure that the amendments do not stifle innovation. Cultivating a cybersecurity culture that supports both robust security and a conducive environment for innovation is paramount for the continued growth of our digital ecosystem. Moreover, in a world where cybersecurity threats transcend borders, international alignment is imperative. Collaborating with other countries to align with global cybersecurity frameworks and standards will enhance the effectiveness of our defenses on a global scale. Addressing the cross-border aspect of cybersecurity is vital, so that service providers are held accountable for breaches occurring in overseas facilities that impact services in Singapore. In closing, let us fortify our digital defenses without hindering our economic progress.”
“How will these measures affect Singapore's attractiveness for data centre companies? Particularly, how will this impact smaller players, subcontractors to larger providers, who may be responsible for third-party owned CII critical to service delivery? Third, Mr Speaker, Sir, cybersecurity threats transcend borders. We must leverage international collaboration to strengthen our defenses. Aligning ourselves with global frameworks will enhance our collective response. For this reason, I urge the Government to elaborate on how these amendments align with international cybersecurity frameworks and standards. By aligning ourselves with international efforts, we can ensure that our defenses are interoperable and effective on a global scale. Can the Government elaborate on opportunities for collaboration with other countries to enhance our collective response to cyber threats? While this Bill focuses on data centres and cloud servers within Singapore, many service providers utilise overseas facilities. How will this Bill address this cross-border aspect? Will providers still be held responsible for breaches occurring in overseas data centres if it disrupts their services in Singapore? Lastly, Mr Speaker, Sir, the effectiveness of the Cybersecurity Act hinges on transparency and accountability. The proposed amendments empower authorities. This power must be balanced with public trust. Transparency and accountability are the cornerstones of a strong cybersecurity posture. The public deserves to know how these measures are being implemented. Can the Government clearly outline the mechanisms that will be established to ensure transparency and accountability in the implementation of these measures? How will the public be informed about how these powers are being used?”
“How will the Government support businesses that struggle to navigate the legal changes? In addition, the Government must ensure that the new CII reporting requirements are clear, concise and do not create an undue burden on businesses. Can the Ministry share what resources are available to assist businesses in complying with these requirements? I urge the Government to outline a clear plan on how it will help SMEs comply with the new requirements, including any provision of financial support or specialised guidance. Moving on, Mr Speaker, Sir, my second topic is on the impact on innovation, which is the bedrock of our digital ecosystem. Let us not stifle it on the altar of security. We must cultivate a cybersecurity culture that prioritises both robust security and a conducive environment for innovation. Singaporean ingenuity has always thrived on calculated risks. We must not lose that spirit. How might the amendments in the Bill affect the agility and risk-taking appetite of tech companies? In this vein, I urge the Government to elaborate on measures that will be taken to strike a balance. Can we cultivate a cybersecurity culture that prioritises both robust security and a supportive environment for innovation? The proposed amendments rightly acknowledge the importance of allowing CII operators to leverage new technologies. This is critical for Singapore to maintain its competitive edge in the digital arena. How can we create an environment that encourages the adoption of new technologies, while maintaining the highest security standards? This Bill also has designations like "critical information infrastructure" and "entities of special cybersecurity interest" alongside additional reporting requirements.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, before I begin, I declare that I am working in an investment firm that has investments in cybersecurity companies. Singapore's digital economy is the engine of our nation's prosperity. But just as a strong house requires sturdy defenses, our digital realm necessitates robust cybersecurity. While I support strengthening our Cybersecurity Act, I believe some of the proposed amendments warrant further discussion. I would like to seek some clarifications on the Bill. First, Mr Speaker, Sir, the financial burden on businesses, especially SMEs, must be carefully considered. We need transparency on the true cost of compliance across different sectors. Businesses are the foundation of our economic strength. We should not burden them with unnecessary red tape. There are several concerns I want to raise on this aspect. The amendments may increase compliance costs for these businesses. The legal jargon may be too complex, something which the public consultation document has itself acknowledged. This raises concerns for smaller businesses that lack dedicated legal resources. And the mandatory requirement for CII operators to report all incidents targeting their systems is commendable. However, excessive reporting requirements may overwhelm businesses. With these concerns in mind, I have several questions and suggestions for the Government. First, can the Government elaborate on the specific cost considerations that informed the drafting of the Bill? What is the expected increase in compliance costs for businesses? Are there plans to provide assistance to businesses to help them cope with the increased costs? Next, what steps will be taken to ensure that the final text of the Act can be easily understood by businesses of all sizes and the common man?”
“The proposed amendments encapsulate our commitment to nurturing this important sector, empowering co-operatives to adapt and thrive in a rapidly changing landscape. Through transparent governance, support for smaller societies, and a commitment to ongoing evaluation, we pave the way for a stronger, more resilient co-operative ecosystem. By embracing these changes, we not only ensure the continued success of stalwarts like NTUC FairPrice but also foster an environment where all co-operatives can flourish, contributing meaningfully to our society and economy. I support this Bill, recognising the immense potential of co-operatives to shape a more inclusive and prosperous future for Singapore.”
“Members and stakeholders deserve clear information on reserve allocation and distribution. Robust reporting mechanisms will foster trust and confidence in the co-operative system as a whole. Second, Mr Speaker, Sir, the impact on small and medium-sized societies deserves careful consideration. These organisations may face challenges complying with the new requirements due to limited resources or a lack of familiarity with the processes. To ensure inclusive growth within the co-operative movement, I urge the Minister to explore the provision of advisory support and clear guidance to assist these societies in navigating the amendments effectively. Can the Ministry elaborate on the available support measures for them? At a small scale compared to other entities, co-operatives struggle to attract and retain talent. How can the Government help more in this area? Also, how can Government help smaller co-operatives to digitalise to keep up with changing consumer demands, as well as deal with challenges associated with digitalisation such as cybersecurity? Lastly, Mr Speaker, Sir, I propose implementing periodic review and monitoring mechanisms to assess the effectiveness of these changes. As with any new policy, there may be unintended consequences or areas for improvement that emerge over time. By actively seeking feedback and monitoring the practical impact, we can make necessary adjustments to ensure that the amendments achieve their intended goals. In conclusion, Mr Speaker, Sir, the essence of Singapore's co-operative movement – built on self-help, mutual assistance and economic empowerment – remains as relevant today as it did in its inception.”
“Nevertheless, beyond this, will the Government also consider providing more flexibility and options to co-operatives on how they manage their finances? This is important as they face the challenge of relevance amid competition. For instance, besides a one-size-fits-all approach, will the Government consider having a differentiated approach to allow for more flexibility for co-operatives with better fiduciary governance? Also, will the Government allow credit co-operatives to advertise their loans to create greater awareness of the services that are available to their Members? Next, transparent, and accountable implementation is critical. Can the Minister clarify on the specific criteria and process the Registrar will use for evaluation and approval. Clear guidelines and robust approval processes are essential to prevent misuse or conflicts of interest. Concerns regarding administrative burden exist. The proposed legislative amendments would require the Registrar’s approval for dividends and honoraria that are paid from reserves. We must ensure that the Registry of Co-operative Societies has sufficient resources to handle the anticipated workload and expedite approvals for all current 80 co-operatives and future ones, preventing unnecessary delays. The proposed reduction in signatories for by-law amendment applications, from three to one, requires careful consideration. While streamlining processes is valuable, will this weaken the system of checks and balances? Can a single chairperson, with ill intentions, exploit this change to amend by-laws unilaterally for his own benefit? If so, what are the safeguards to prevent this? To further strengthen the co-operative movement, I propose enhancing reporting and disclosure requirements.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, Singapore's co-operative movement boasts a rich heritage, flourishing since the establishment of the first credit co-operative in the 1920s. Today, about 80 co-operatives serve approximately one million members across diverse sectors. NTUC FairPrice, Singapore's largest supermarket retailer and a member-owned co-operative, stands as a prime example. FairPrice continues to play a critical role in keeping Singapore's cost of living in check, by ensuring affordable prices for all. The appeal of the co-operative mode can be attributed to several factors. First, it emphasises self-help, mutual assistance and economic empowerment – principles that resonate with many Singaporeans. Secondly, the Government has played a critical role in supporting the co-operative movement. The Co-operative Societies Act provides a legal framework for co-operatives to operate, and the establishment of the Singapore National Co-operative Federation (SNCF) fosters their development. Given the importance of our co-operatives, it is essential that we regularly review the policies and ensure that co-operatives remain relevant in Singapore. I would like to raise several clarifications on the Bill. First, Mr Speaker, Sir, I commend the intent behind allowing co-operative societies to pay dividends and honoraria from their reserves, subject to the Registrar's approval. This approach empowers them to reward members and incentivise good governance. This can potentially lead to better benefits and services for members of organisations like NTUC FairPrice. As such, this is a welcomed amendment – payouts to members are likely to be more stable. Payouts will also be useful given the rising cost of living.”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I thank the Minister for his response. I just have a very short supplementary question. Will the Ministry consider exploring alternative pathways into special needs education, such as attracting professionals with relevant experience from other fields through conversion programmes?”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I thank the Senior Minister of State for his response. From a systems perspective, integrating telemedicine into existing care protocols rather than offering them as an optional add-on, is critical for optimising patient care delivery. This balanced approach empowers healthcare professionals to assess the most suitable modality for each patient's needs, avoiding unnecessary telemedicine use. With this in mind, I have two questions. First, for new hospitals opened to piloting telemedicine, can it be incorporated as a standard part of routine clinical practice? Second, beyond public awareness campaigns, are there plans to incentivise primary care physicians to utilise telemedicine for appropriate consultations? This could potentially reduce strain on emergency services and generate cost savings.”
“Ensuring public trust and confidence in these systems require transparency and proactive measures to prevent future issues. Let us continue to embrace technological advancements while safeguarding the legal validity and effectiveness of the use of electronic documents in Singapore. This is vitally important as we continue to encourage Singaporeans to plan for end-of-life issues early. I support the Bill.”
“Mdm Deputy Speaker, in the event we lose mental capacity, an LPA allows us to appoint a trusted individual, called a Donee, to make decisions on our behalf regarding our finances, property and healthcare. This is an invaluable tool. It ensures that our wishes are respected, even if we can no longer express them ourselves. The move towards digital LPAs is a welcomed step towards greater efficiency and accessibility. However, the recent discovery concerning the omission of a statement in electronic LPAs raises grave concerns. While I understand that retrospective action has been taken, I seek some clarifications. First, what would have been the legal implications for holders of LPA documents missing the required sentence? Second, why was this oversight not identified earlier? What drafting and vetting processes failed in transporting the physical LPA to the online version? Third, have there been any Court cases challenging the validity of e-LPAs, due to this missing clause? How will this be resolved? If there is any legal cost involved resultantly, which party will bear the costs? Moving forward, how does the Ministry plan to inform LPA Donors about the corrective changes made? Will they receive a hard copy letter outlining the necessary information? More importantly, what measures will be put in place to prevent similar situations from happening in the future? Will there be a system in place to check and ensure all essential clauses are included in future e-documents prepared by the Government? In conclusion, Mdm Deputy Speaker, the Government must address these concerns promptly and effectively. The Government should not allow such concerns to cast a shadow of doubt over the overall benefits of adopting a digital system for Government services.”
“However, to maximise its effectiveness, I urge the House to consider the following: first, protect vulnerable populations. We must establish clear guidelines to address the misuse of seniors' identities for SIM card registration. Educational initiatives can empower them to identify and prevent such exploitation. Second, empower retailers. A system for anonymous whistleblowing by retailers, coupled with an incentive program like "Trusted SIM Retailer" designation, can significantly improve vigilance and reporting. Next, regarding the amendments to Police powers, while empowering officers to apprehend individuals with mental health issues is critical, ensuring fair implementation is paramount. To this end, transparency and clear guidelines are essential to prevent misuse of power and public fear. We also need to equip Police officers with comprehensive training, with real-world scenarios, giving them access to mental health professionals, and providing a framework to escalate complex cases. By prioritising these recommendations, we can strengthen the Bill and ensure it safeguards both our citizens and their security. Let us work together to send a clear message: zero tolerance for SIM card misuse and having trust in the enforcement of Police powers. With the proposed amendments, we can create a more secure Singapore for all. I support the Bill.”
“The proposed law empowers Police to apprehend individuals under specific circumstances. To ensure transparency and to minimise apprehension, the Ministry should clarify these thresholds. Additionally, clear guidelines are critical to prevent potential power abuses and ensure effective collaboration with mental health professionals. While traditional training methods have value, equipping Police with real-world case studies, hands-on experience and access to mental health experts is vital. Training should emphasise de-escalation tactics and provide a framework for officers to escalate complex situations to appropriate personnel for further evaluation. Moving on, Mr Speaker, Sir, as we delve into other aspects of the Bill, it is critical to acknowledge the limitations of some of the new regulations while exploring further solutions. While section 39H of the Bill allows for extraterritorial effect, the question of enforcement remains. How will this provision be effectively implemented? How will we establish collaborative efforts with other foreign jurisdictions to apprehend perpetrators operating outside our borders? Additionally, part 2 clause 6 empowers the Police to decide against pursuing non-arrestable offenses. The criteria outlined – cases deemed "not of a serious nature" or with "insufficient grounds" – warrant further clarification. For instance, how will this impact issues like neighbourly disputes or noise complaints? Will isolated incidents of nuisance be entirely dismissed, leaving residents with no avenue for recourse? A clear framework for addressing such situations is necessary. In conclusion, Mr Speaker, Sir, this Bill represents a positive step towards combating the rise of SIM card misuse and enhancing public safety.”
“I am concerned that if our Police officers lack the expertise to do so, they may not be able to use the powers effectively or responsibly. The recent case of Mah Kiat Seng vs Attorney-General and Others has raised some concerns. In this case, Mr Mah claimed he was wrongly arrested and imprisoned based on false information provided by a Police officer. How can the Government prevent similar situations from happening again? With great power comes great responsibility. The good standing of our men in blue relies on them being able to exercise their powers in a manner that balances the need for decisive action in high-stress operational situations, with a keen sense of human dignity and skillful instinct honed through experience and training. This is all the more delicate when Police deal with the mentally ill who have already been triggered by stressful situations and this becomes further exacerbated by Police intervention. While the law empowers Police to apprehend individuals believed to be a danger to themselves or others due to mental health concerns, it is critical to have safeguards against misuse. The Court acknowledged the importance of Police discretion in such situations, but also highlighted the need for responsible action. This case raises the question: what safeguards are in place to prevent Police officers from overstepping their authority, as seen in the Mah Kiat Seng case? Public trust in our institutions hinges on the belief that we act in the best interests of all Singaporeans. This extends to our Police force, who require proper training and clear guidelines to uphold their duty effectively. Unclear procedures create apprehension for both the public and Police officers, potentially hindering enforcement and fostering disputes.”
“Recognising retailers who actively participate in combating SIM card misuse could be highly effective. For example, a public recognition program that designates them as "Trusted SIM Retailers" would not only incentivise vigilance, but also boost their reputation among customers seeking secure and responsible service providers. It may also deter possible perpetrators from approaching such retailers. This approach fosters collaboration and promotes ethical practices within the retail sector. Next, Mr Speaker, Sir, I will move on to address the amendments relating to the apprehension of mentally disordered persons. In particular, the lowering of the threshold before a mentally disordered individual may be apprehended to one of reasonable suspicion, when an act of possible harm is reasonably likely to occur and not only when it is imminent and mental disorder is suspected. I support the move to empower Police officers to apprehend the said individuals. The harm they may cause to themselves or others around them is irreparable. An obvious example is if they end up successfully committing suicide or homicide. The move is a pre-emptive approach that protects both the person, as well as those around them. At the outset, we must always remember that mental illness is not a crime. Mental illness expressed as anti-social behaviour in and of itself may not be life-threatening. Even among the mentally ill, there is a wide spectrum of behaviours. It is thus imperative that our Police officers must be better equipped to identify potential signs of mental illness, both in the individuals with a history and those without, always with the view of harm reduction and not the stigmatisation of the mentally ill.”
“I am glad that those who have legitimate reasons or were genuinely tricked into giving up their particulars would not be held liable. Nevertheless, I also understand that this could complicate enforcement and proving intent is always difficult. Hence, we must try to tackle the problem at its roots. How will this Bill target family members, relatives, caregivers and persons who exploit their close contact with vulnerable elderly, in misusing their identity to register SIM cards? Are there plans to educate and warn the elderly against the misuse of their identity in SIM card registration? Likewise, how does this Bill address situations where multiple SIM cards have been misused by family members, but the elderly person feigns or alleges ignorance? Will there be penalties for the elderly and subsequently, the main perpetrator? Second, Mr Speaker, Sir, we should create a system that empowers retailers to whistle blow conveniently and anonymously. The role of retailers in combating this issue cannot be overstated. Retailers are on the front lines. Empowering them to act as a safeguard is critical. But expecting them to reject every suspected case of bulk SIM card purchases for malicious purposes may not be practical. Customer service personnel may face pressure from their superiors or irate customers if a purchase is mistakenly flagged. Therefore, exploring alternative avenues for retailers to report suspicious activities is essential. The Government should develop an avenue that allows for convenient and anonymous whistle blowing. This would alleviate the burden of direct confrontation for customer service personnel and will encourage more proactive reporting. Furthermore, exploring incentives for such reporting is worth considering.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I will focus on two topics: first, on local SIM card misuse; and second, on the enhancement of police officers' powers in apprehending people who show signs of a mental disorder and pose a safety risk to themselves or others. First, local SIM card misuse has seen an exponential surge in recent years. The statistics are alarming. The number of local mobile lines implicated in scams and other cybercrimes has quadrupled in just two years. This worrying trend is reflected in the financial losses as well, with victims losing nearly triple the amount in 2023 – a staggering $384 million compared to $137 million in 2021. The nature of these scams has also evolved, making them more insidious. In the past, a simple rule of thumb of ignoring unexpected calls with foreign numbers sufficed as a cautionary measure. However, criminals have now shifted tactics, exploiting local phone numbers to lure unsuspecting victims. This shift preys on the inherent trust we place on local calls, especially for our vulnerable elderly population. Our seniors are more likely to answer local calls, creating a prime opportunity for scammers to exploit their trust. The consequences can be devastating when victims fall prey to such deception. While I commend the Government's initiative to tighten regulations and combat this issue, I believe that there are several key clarifications that need to be addressed. First, Mr Speaker, Sir, we must acknowledge the vulnerability of certain individuals. These very people can become unwitting accomplices, having their SIM cards misused either by mistake or through exploitation. They are, in essence, both victims and potential targets.”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I thank the Senior Minister of State for his reply. Can the Senior Minister of State elaborate on the potential impact of this incident on Singapore's reputation for international military and defence-related discussions, like the Shangri-La Dialogue? And is the Ministry proactively conducting vulnerability assessments on our telecommunications infrastructure to prevent something like this from happening?”
“I thank the Senior Parliamentary Secretary for her response. Since 1 December 2023, NEA's enforcement officers have been empowered to take action against individuals who possess vaporisers and cases have been referred to HSA. Two supplementary questions. One, will more agencies come on board as part of this cross-enforcement project? And two, will HSA continue to take the lead on this issue and ensure that, amongst the agencies involved, processes will be aligned, protocols will be made smoother in the apprehension of people who have vaporisers?”
“I thank the Senior Minister of State for his reply. I also note that the Health Minister had shared at the MOH Committee of Supply that he is working with urgent care clinics as well as GPFirst clinics to deal with non-emergency cases. My supplementary question is this: since we are a very digitally connected country, is the Ministry exploring partnerships with telehealth providers to create a more accessible and efficient healthcare network for non-emergency cases? And secondly, are there any best practices from other countries that can be adapted to inform Singapore's public awareness campaigns for seeking appropriate medical care?”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I thank the Senior Minister of State for his reply. I am heartened to hear that the Ministry will consider appeals on a case-by-case basis. Just a short supplementary question. Instead of complete exclusion, could the Ministry consider a graduated and differentiated eligibility system for the Silver Support Scheme based on flat size and remaining lease lengths? This is because some seniors may be living in larger flats, but they have no savings and no financial support from their family.”
“Thank you. My clarifications are for the Second Minister. I am heartened to hear that there are many initiatives to help our seniors age well in the community. I have two clarifications. First is on the National Silver Academy (NSA), which offers many useful courses for learning for seniors. However, awareness of the courses and training are still quite spotty on the ground. So, how can we improve awareness and take-up rate amongst our seniors for these courses? Second, I am glad to note that the waiting time for nursing homes is about one month. Minister mentioned that there are interim care options for those who are on the waitlist. Can he share what are these options and how can caregivers get access to these options?”
“I thank the Senior Parliamentary Secretary for his response. Besides fines, are there other measures, such as project suspension or blacklisting, taken against repeat offenders causing noise infractions? I ask this Parliamentary Question, because many of my residents in Yio Chu Kang are affected by the noise pollution from the NSC construction. Has the Ministry conducted any studies to assess the potential health impact of noise pollution on residents, particularly vulnerable populations, like elderly or children? And has the Ministry also explored alternative construction methods or technologies that could help minimise some of this noise pollution from the project?”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I thank the Minister for his response. Is the Ministry considering exploring innovative partnerships with non-traditional stakeholders like tech companies or startup incubators to create new job opportunities for graduates? Second, how is the Ministry leveraging technology and data analytics to improve job matching for graduates and connect them with relevant opportunities across different sectors?”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I thank the Senior Minister of State for the reply. I have a very short supplementary question. In light of this incident, how are our civil servants trained to be more aware of such cyber attacks by state-sponsored actors?”
“Third, while I support the decision to expand the non-profit model, whether the experiment will ultimately prove viable, will also hinge crucially on whether the associated tax exemptions are accompanied by increased or decreased flexibility of operations. Otherwise, if the approach is simply one of delivering more subsidies that exchange for greater health price regulation, economy plus healthcare, the true advantage of the non-profit model may be lost. At the same time, I encourage MOH to also look at public health bills.”
“Indeed, the planned expansion of Alexandra Hospital and the Woodlands Health Campus is likely to only fix current shortfalls, but remain insufficient as our population grows and ages. What this comes down to is a willingness to sacrifice short-run efficiency by accepting a certain amount of redundancy in the interim, at least until the needs inevitably arise. My sense is that this will only occur when our current occupancy rate for hospitals remains substantially below 80%, at least for a certain duration. To achieve this, I believe that the current system can stand to expand its transition care offerings. I will suggest three ideas. First, we can ramp up our urgent care offerings as an intermediate option, complementing existing GP polyclinics versus A&E solutions. While still uncommon, there are already several urgent care centres (UCCs) in Singapore, including the reclassification of Alexandra Hospital's A&E department into a UCC, along with several private providers. Singaporeans should be educated about using this channel for non-life-threatening medical emergencies, especially with regard to the substantially shorter wait times compared to A&E. It can also relieve the pressure on polyclinics to triage such cases for which they are not designed for. Second, we can improve the incentives for transition care at home, perhaps with cash incentives paid directly to patients using savings that would otherwise go toward hospitalisation expenses. The Government can directly encourage this by providing rebates to insurance companies for encouraging select cases to pursue this route.”
“0 is important. I am glad the Housing and Development Board (HDB) is going to roll-out EASE 2.0 from 1 April onwards, which includes the expansion of the wireless Alert Alarm System to benefit more seniors. How will the Ministry raise awareness about this system and other fall detection solutions, especially among seniors who live alone? At the broader level, will the Ministry partner with technology companies to develop similar senior-friendly applications? These solutions can also be used for social interaction, health monitoring or for accessing services. Chairman, building a society where everyone ages well necessitates a multi-pronged approach. By addressing social isolation, providing accessible care options and investing in community infrastructure and manpower, we can ensure our seniors live fulfilled and dignified lives within their communities. Healthcare Capacity in Ageing Society Assoc Prof Jamus Jerome Lim (Sengkang): In my speech on the Motion on supporting healthcare in May last year, I spoke about how hospital bed and medical personnel capacity in our fair nation falls short of what may be expected, not just compared to almost every other advanced economy, but also to our own internal benchmarks. This has led to us failing to meet health service quality targets set by MOH. Things have improved somewhat since then, but capacity still remains constrained. Medium wait times at the end of January can still exceed half a day in Changi General and Khoo Teck Puat, while the bed occupancy rate for all but one of the public hospitals hovers above the Ministry's own preferred 80% ceiling. There is a dire need to relieve not only our capacity shortfalls in the short run, but also any projected long-run need.”
“I want to focus on how we can ensure that our seniors stay active, connected and well-cared for within their communities, aligning with the Age Well SG strategy. Firstly, how will the Ministry evaluate the success of Age Well SG initiatives? This could involve metrics on senior well-being, programme effectiveness and cost-efficiency. How will the Ministry implement the shift from insititutionalised care to community and home-based care, highlighting specific initiatives, take-up rates and timelines? Secondly, understanding the current state of care is critical. Can the Minister share the current average waiting time for nursing home beds? What novel models of care are available to bridge the gap and prevent institutionalisation? Thirdly, can the Minister update on the progress of rolling out Active Ageing Centres (AACs) to seniors in non-rental flats, ensuring broader accessibility? When will the expansion cover all seniors? How will AACs implement initiatives that specifically foster inter-generational relationships, tackling social isolation for seniors while providing learning opportunities for younger generations? How do we specifically reach out to those seniors who are reluctant to socialise, as they are most vulnerable to loneliness? Fourthly, enhancing home-based care for seniors with higher needs is critical. Does the Ministry also have a target of how many patients do we aim to onboard for home-based care? As home care can be resource-intensive, can the Ministry also share about the long-term financial sustainability of such programmes, especially regarding potential future cost increases and affordability for seniors? How can we increase public awareness of home-based care? Similarly, improving our seniors’ home environment through initiatives like EASE 2.”
“The Healthier SG initiative holds immense promise for transforming our healthcare system towards upstream and preventive care. Firstly, can the Minister share the latest enrolment figures for Healthier SG as of today, as well as the statistics for the number of participants who have attended their first consultation? Understanding the level of public engagement is important to gauge the programme's effectiveness. Secondly, can the Minister elaborate on the format of personalised health plans or social prescriptions? Will they include a list of recommended activities tailored to individual needs? How will compliance and implementation be ensured? The recent rollout of Healthier SG chronic tier subsidies and the broader direction to encourage GPs to manage more chronic conditions, is welcomed news. However, I have some concerns regarding its impact on the wider population. Firstly, not all GPs have equal expertise in managing every chronic condition, especially relating to issues of mental health. Will this expansion lead to patients having to switch GPs to access the full benefits of Healthier SG? Secondly, ensuring participating GPs have the necessary resources and expertise is critical. How will the Ministry equip them with the training, tools, and support they need to effectively manage these additional chronic conditions, particularly those requiring specialised knowledge? We need to avoid overburdening GPs and jeopardising the quality of care for existing patients. Preparing for a Super-aged Society As we witness an increasing number of seniors living alone, the potential for social isolation and unmet care needs becomes a pressing concern.”
“How will it empower local contractors and SMEs, to participate meaningfully in the construction sector? Better Support for Contractors”
“Chairman, while the existing tender system for commercial units within HDB estates offers some variety through different categories like supermarkets, eating houses and other shops, it lacks centralised planning. This can result in an oversaturation of certain types of services, leaving residents lacking access to other essential or desired options. I urge the Government to adopt a more centralised planning approach to ensure a diversity of services within HDB estates. Essential services, like clinics, pharmacies, eldercare and childcare facilities, should be prioritised. This would be followed by ensuring a balanced mix of retail categories, including F&B, grocery stores and shops for daily necessities. HDB should consider residents’ demographics and conduct outreach activities to ensure offerings are relevant and accessible. A vibrant mix of shops and amenities not only enhances convenience but also fosters a sense of community and belonging. 12.15 pm Supporting SMEs Onerous tendering requirements, inconvenient invoicing processes, lengthy payment delays and bundled contracts create financial strain for many SMEs in today's high-cost capital environment. Can we leverage technology to digitalise the end-to-end payment process and expedite settlements? Can the Government also implement regular milestone payments on a quarterly basis, aligned with project progress, rather than paying a lump-sum only upon project completion? Bundled contracts also raise concerns about limited flexibility and risk absorption, especially during unforeseen circumstances like the recent pandemic. Can the Ministry explore alternative approaches to mitigate these risks? Finally, can the Ministry elaborate on the Tender Lite initiative announced last year?”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker, I thank the Senior Parliamentary Secretary for his reply. I have two supplementary questions. Beyond enforcement, is the Ministry considering collaborating with retailers and distributors to educate consumers on identifying safe and certified active mobility device (AMD) batteries? Second, given the rise in some of these fires involving AMDs, is the Ministry considering stricter safety regulations for all AMDs, including mandatory fire retardant casings or automatic shut-off mechanisms for some of these machines?”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I thank the Minister of State for his reply. I have several such blocks in Yio Chu Kang which do not have direct lift access, like Blocks 642 and 648. Residents who have lived in this estate for decades now have mobility issues. Asking them to take up the LHG and move out of their home and the community that they are familiar with, is not really an option for them. Can the Ministry share more about the cost-benefit analysis of accessibility of options, such as creating lift options and compared against relocation grants? The Ministry has also previously shared that they are looking into alternative solutions using technology. Is there a timeline for this? Assoc Prof Dr Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim: Sir, I thank the Member for the supplementary questions. I would like to assure the Member that we will continue to explore additional viable options to assist the residents affected on this matter. I shared in my answer that the Member can refer the households with such pressing accessibility needs to the HDB so that we can better understand their needs and explore suitable options with them.”
“Second clarification revolves around the Majulah Package. I do not think that it should be limited to those born in 1973 or earlier. So, will the Ministry consider extending this to younger cohorts when they reach 50 in the future?”
“Thank you, Chairman. My clarifications are around the topic of retirement adequacy. One, with the closure of the SA, could MOM clarify what happens to CPF members who have made CPF investments using their SA? Two, the Majulah Package should not be limited to those born in 1973 or earlier. Can I ask the Ministry whether they would consider extending this to the younger cohorts when they reach 50 years old in the future? 5.45 pm”
“Chairman, the well-being of our lower-wage workers is critical to a fair and inclusive society. Therefore, I would like to commend the efforts taken to uplift their wages and working conditions through the PWM. Can the Minister share an update on the progress of the PWM expansion across different sectors? Are we on track to achieve the intended outcomes, particularly in ensuring lower-wage workers receive liveable wages that reflect their contributions in this inflationary environment? Is there a plan to review and potentially further raise the LQS to benefit a larger pool of lower-wage workers? While Government policies play a vital role, collective action is key to truly uplifting lower-wage workers. In this regard, I would like to highlight two important stakeholders. First, employers. Investing in upskilling and training lower-wage workers not only increases their productivity and employability but also empowers them to access higher-paying jobs. Can the Ministry explore further initiatives with relevant agencies to incentivise upskilling programmes for lower-wage workers across more sectors? Second, consumers. Supporting businesses that have attained the PW Mark showcases our commitment to ethical and responsible consumption. Can we partner with MTI to raise public awareness about the PW Mark and encourage conscious consumer choices that reward good practices?”
“Chairman, today, I want to focus on two key aspects of building a more inclusive workforce: harnessing the potential of senior workers and fostering FWAs. First, as Singapore's population ages, raising retirement and re-employment ages is a positive step in the right direction. However, maximising their potential requires more than just extending their tenure. Can the Ministry share plans to support structured career planning, re-employment opportunities and job redesign to harness the potential of senior workers? Second, FWA unlocks true inclusivity in our workforce. I commend the Public Service for leading the way. It is encouraging to see more companies implementing diverse and sustainable approaches since the pandemic. These include work arrangement autonomy, flexible hours, compressed workweeks, remote work and job-sharing. The key message is this: output, not location, should matter. FWA empowers a diverse workforce to thrive, regardless of personal limitations or preferences. However, extending flexible work opportunities to the frontline, shift and blue-collar workers present unique challenges. To truly foster inclusivity, can the Ministry share on strategies that cater to diverse roles and responsibilities? This could empower individuals like caregivers, PwDs and others who require flexibility to join or remain in the workforce. FWA benefit employers too. Looking at Singapore's best employers ranking list, working from home is clearly a key factor, with Google topping the list for its hybrid work arrangements even after the pandemic. Let us move beyond simply offering FWA as a benefit. Let us strive to make FWAs the norm, accessible to everyone regardless of their profession or position. Updates on FWAs”
“Chairman, the issue of retirement adequacy lies close to the hearts of many Singaporeans. The recent Forward Singapore initiatives, including the Majulah Package, increased Enhanced Retirement Scheme (ERS) payouts and so forth, are commendable steps towards strengthening retirement adequacy and our social compact. They promise support for seniors who need more help, ensuring greater peace of mind, especially in this inflationary environment. Can the Minister elaborate on how these changes and initiatives translate to tangible benefits for citizens, especially for those who require more support? Next, the Silver Support Scheme (SSS) continues to play a critical role in ensuring financial support for vulnerable seniors. However, with the rising cost of living, is the current SSS quantum adequate to meet their basic needs and maintain a decent standard of living? Can the Minister elaborate on plans to review and potentially adjust the Scheme's payout to reflect evolving needs? These policies represent a renewed commitment to a multi-pronged approach involving the Government, families, employers and the wider community. By working together, we can create a supportive ecosystem that empowers our seniors to retire with dignity and security. Central Provident Fund (CPF)”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I thank the Senior Parliamentary Secretary for her reply. I declare that I am an advisor to the Healthcare Services Employees' Union (HSEU). I have several supplementary questions. How are the salaries in the community compared to the acute hospitals and is there a significant difference? If so, will the pay alone be a significant factor in drawing manpower either way to institutions or to the community? Will there be any effect on our priorities in staffing the community hospitals or the hospitals in the acute sector? Secondly, we need to think of ways to attract and retain talent beyond salary. To this end, what are the Ministry's plans to address other factors influencing staff satisfaction and retention, such as career progression, opportunities or mental health support? How are the unions involved in this?”
“Mr Speaker, I thank the Minister for his reply. I have two supplementary questions. One, which are the specific industries experiencing high retrenchments, and what are the targeted Government support for these sectors? Two, can the Minister share about the Government's approach to encouraging businesses to prioritise retraining and redeployment of existing employees before resorting to retrenchments?”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. I thank the Minister for his reply. I also thank him for his reply to my cut on service delivery during yesterday's Prime Minister's Office (PMO) Committee of Supply debate. Good to hear that we are expanding more ServiceSG Centres across Singapore – and I hope to get one in Ang Mo Kio and also in Yio Chu Kang. I have two supplementary questions. First, are there plans to increase the availability of multilingual support at the ServiceSG Centres to serve Singapore's diverse population? Second, are there plans by the Public Service to ensure that ServiceSG Centres do not simply duplicate existing services offered by individual Ministries and agencies, but rather, take the opportunity of co-location to streamline services? This could mean, perhaps, rewiring certain protocols and processes, reduce duplication and perhaps, find new ways of doing things.”
“Chairman, as Singapore navigates an increasingly complex future, our residents' needs will grow even more diverse and interconnected. We must shift from agency-centric services to citizen-centric ones. We can no longer expect Singaporeans to navigate bureaucratic silos, going from agency to agency to access essential assistance for multiple needs which are in fact interconnected. Imagine a scenario where families in need seamlessly access financial aid, job training, housing assistance and healthcare for seniors, all through a single, integrated platform. This holistic approach, where services revolve around residents rather than agencies, is not just a vision but a necessity today. Initiatives like ServiceSG and the Municipal Services Office have made strides towards service integration. Can the Minister provide an update on the progress and impact of these initiatives. Can the Minister also share the Government's broader roadmap for further integrating and streamlining citizens’ access to services. While digitalisation holds immense potential and we should continue to pursue this as much as possible, physical accessibility remains critical for those who need it. Can the Minister share plans to expand dedicated physical service counters for seniors and individuals lacking digital literacy? Can the Minister also elaborate on the existing mechanisms for escalation across agencies, and how timely resolution is ensured? What are the types of cases that usually fall through the cracks? How is the Ministry addressing such cases to ensure no citizens are left behind? Conflict of Interest Update”
“Overall Population Strategies – Fertility”