Muhamad Faisal Bin Abdul Manap
Singapore
“Sir, I believe that the Minister did not answer quite a number of my questions. But due to time factors, I will submit a Parliamentary Question. Nonetheless, I have two clarifications. One, on the full-time madrasahs.”
“Is MOH looking into more aggressively hiring junior doctors, especially those that have left the public healthcare system? How do they intend to do so? Will it include increasing doctor's salaries to better compete with the private sectors and, if so, how much?”
“Sir, actually, I have written to SFA and they have actually replied to me recently. I just want to get a better clarification on the issues. What happened was that there is this issue that has been going on for about 10 years where the bakery located in the same block, a four-storey HDB block, has been emanating noise, heat and pungent sm…”
“What are SFA's requirements for bakeries to operate in a HDB residential block emitting the noise and heat levels resulting from their daily operations?”
“Sir, earlier in my speech, I have sought two clarifications on my cuts pertaining to ventilation systems for bakeries in order to better manage the disamenities caused by bakeries located in the HDB blocks. I really have not received a reply on this from the Ministry.”
“Sir, on the contrary, the implication of not approving LTVP+ applications for both these groups is that their lives will become more challenging and it will further complicate their lives. I would like to request that ICA exercise greater flexibility to applicants who are facing the two situations that I mentioned.”
The complete record
Every one of 597 lines we hold for Muhamad Faisal Bin Abdul Manap, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 7 of 12.
“[Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Sir, this Public Sector (Governance) Bill seeks to provide a consistent framework and practice amongst Public Service bodies. I support this Bill but, at the same time, I would like to seek two clarifications. Firstly, I would like to request further information from the Minister on Part 5, titled Financial Administration, which contains clause 33 to clause 41. Based on my understanding, clause 33 states that the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (MUIS), categorised in Group 3A Public Bodies, is exempted from clauses 34 to 41. Is my understanding correct? If it is correct, can the Minister provide the reasons for this exemption? (In English): My second clarification is regarding clause 11. My colleague, Ms Sylvia Lim, had earlier touched on that explanatory note stating that the introduction of clause 11 was "to ensure that the public sector, like the Singapore Public Service, not be politicised". It would be much appreciated if the Minister can define and elaborate more on the word "politicised" as stated in the explanatory note and also to cite an example or two so that Members will have a clearer and better understanding of the phrase "not be politicised". Additionally, I will share two scenarios and would like to ask the Minister to provide his views whether, in these two scenarios, the Public Service entity mentioned has more or less been politicised. The first scenario, an individual who is a member of the political party and who contested but was defeated in the General Election who is now holding two designations at the same time – one, a branch chairman of a political party and two, as an advisor to grassroots organisation which, in fact, is a position appointed and endorsed by PA's executive board.”
“Sir, I have officially stated my stand on this issue when we discussed in this Chamber on the private Motion moved by Mr Christopher de Souza, regarding using multiculturalism approach as a weapon to fight against terrorism. So, my simple answer to the Minister is no.”
“If the Minister does not mind, can the Minister repeat his question?”
“I believe the Minister did not answer my question. I just want to know whether there is a process involved or a channel for an appeal to be made.”
“I would like to thank the Minister for his reply. I have one supplementary question. I just want to know whether the Ministry engages these foreign religious preachers to give them an opportunity to explain themselves prior to the imposition of the ban or after the ban had been imposed, in a way to allow them to make an appeal against the ban.”
“Sir, I am of the view and belief that the amalgamation of these three aspects, namely, religious values, learning Psychology, as well as community and national values, is a necessary combination in our efforts to strengthen the existing social cohesion. This is because this combination can produce individuals who possess positive characteristics who are proud of their identity as Singaporeans, and this will further enhance efforts to strengthen social cohesion in Singapore.”
“The manipulation of minds is done by planting perspectives and perceptions that are prone to accept and allow such propaganda that is presented to them. I feel that such manipulations can be countered by learning Psychology. Psychology is a field of science pertaining to the mind and behaviour. It covers subjects like human development, social behaviour and the cognitive process, including knowledge about perceptions. A person who is equipped with knowledge of Psychology will likely be able to develop an awareness of himself or herself, as well those around him or her. Psychology is also very relevant in the current context, not only to counter the manipulation of minds in relation to radicalism, but also for other social ills that arise from the usage of social media. We have seen many situations where conflicts arise in social media due to different perspectives and perceptions about current issues and sensitive issues. Often, it descends into insults, through the use of inappropriate words and phrases. I believe that, with a knowledge of Psychology that is obtained in school, this will enable one to have an open mind, because the person understands that it is natural for different perspectives and perceptions to exist, and we should practise mutual respect when encountering such differences. As the Malay saying goes, "we will have dark hair, but we have different hearts" which, in English, means, "we can agree to disagree". Aside from imparting religious values and learning psychology, the inculcation of community and national values is also important. In our country, the inculcation of community and national values is done in schools through the National Education subject. This move has been applauded and has been very beneficial.”
“Both initiatives, the RRG and ARS, showed that it is important and necessary to have efforts that inculcate fundamental and authentic religious values to counter and prevent radicalism and extremism in religion. Sir, there is an English proverb: "prevention is better than cure". Prevention is a very effective way to counter the scourge of radicalism. Efforts for upstream intervention should be done by inculcating relevant knowledge to counter the wave of radicalism, a scourge that is haunting the global community. Here, I would like to suggest that efforts to inculcate religious values at a young age should be done through the national education system. This can be done by reintroducing the Religious Knowledge (RK) subject in secondary schools. Sir, I admit that Singapore is a secular nation and that my suggestion to reintroduce the RK subject is contrary to secular values, but I feel that this step is necessary. This is because the scourge of terrorism, globally as well as in Singapore, has shown that religious doctrine has been used to radicalise individuals. I believe that the inculcation of authentic religious teachings at a young age through the national education system is a more effective method in the effort to prevent radical religious thinking. We should be open to make slight adjustments and changes if the situation calls for it, in order to guarantee social cohesion and the prosperity of the nation. Sir, apart from the RK subject, I would like to suggest that Psychology be introduced as a component of the science subject in secondary schools. Why Psychology? Earlier, I shared how extremists and terrorists manipulate minds in the effort to radicalise an individual.”
“Hence, the best way to counter such radical elements is by inculcating authentic religious values, knowledge that strengthens one's character and also community and national values amongst Singaporeans. Sir, in Singapore since the early 2000s, we have seen cases of radicalism that involve Singaporeans related to the use of religious doctrine. We have seen how JI and ISIS have misused Islamic teachings to manipulate and radicalise the minds of individuals and, hence, influencing them to turn towards violence and terrorism by claiming that this is meant to uphold truth and justice. In Singapore, preventive and rehabilitative steps have been taken and implemented to counter religious ideologies that are radical or extremist in nature. The establishment of RRG is a measure to implement educational and rehabilitative processes for individuals who are lured and influenced by radical beliefs. Local religious teachers and Islamic scholars have stepped forward, worked together and contributed their time and energy voluntarily to help rehabilitate individuals who were taken in by radical propaganda. I would like to take this opportunity to put on record the appreciation to all religious teachers as well as Islamic scholars who have worked hard, patiently and sincerely in this effort. The introduction of the Asatizah Recognition Scheme (ARS) is another effort to ensure that religious guidance being delivered is in line with our context of Singaporeans of different backgrounds living together and, at the same time, prevent any teachings that are based on violence and radical ideologies.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I will deliver my speech in Malay. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Mr Speaker, I support the Motion and would like to make some suggestions towards the effort to strengthen social cohesion so that Singaporeans of all races and religions can stand strong together, with one voice, and prevent, combat and defeat the scourge of radicalism and terrorism together. Sir, news about terror attacks have become commonplace over the past decade. It has frequently been reported that terror incidents taking place, either by certain groups or by individuals, were committed by those who have been influenced and lured by radical ideologies. Many experts who monitored and observed this situation have concluded that the scourge of terrorism and radicalism cannot be easily countered and stopped, and it is highly likely that this situation will persist in the future. The question is, what makes a person become so influenced by radicalism until that person becomes so caught up in it and dares to commit acts of terror, killing innocent lives and destroying public property? How can someone's mind be able to accept that there is nothing wrong with committing acts of terror that are based on the justification of achieving change and justice? Sir, we all know that the process of radicalisation usually involves the use of religious doctrines and politics to manipulate minds so that these individuals see terrorism as a way or approach that is acceptable and, in fact, some feel that it is compulsory in order to achieve an objective. This process is usually used by hardline extremists who submit to certain religious or political ideologies.”
“Madam, I think I mentioned it clearly in my speech, twice, that I support the Bill wholeheartedly. [(proc text) Question put, and agreed to. (proc text)] [(proc text) Bill accordingly read a Second time and committed to a Committee of the whole House. (proc text)] [(proc text) The House immediately resolved itself into a Committee on the Bill. – [Assoc Prof Dr Yaacob Ibrahim.] (proc text)] [(proc text) Bill considered in Committee; reported without amendment; read a Third time and passed. (proc text)]”
“Madam, I stand firm that I did not say anything of that sort in my speech. And I believe my pantun is very clear that we are all accountable to our almighty creator.”
“Madam, I would like to ask the Member, can he point out in my speech, where did I mention anything about what he assumed it to be?”
“Mdm Speaker, I thank the Member for seeking clarification. I believe that the pantun that I have mentioned is very straightforward and the meaning is already there, so I do not need to elaborate more. Thank you, Mdm Speaker.”
“While performing his duties as a Caliph, an incident happened where he found his lost armour in the possession of one of his people who was a Jew. He was sure that the armour was his. Although he was a leader at that time, he did not use his position to force the armour to be returned to him. In fact, he used the judicial system to settle the matter. To make a long story short, the judge decided in favour of the Jewish man with the justification that Sayidina Ali did not provide concrete evidence that the armour was his. The Jewish man was truly impressed with the nature of justice portrayed by Sayidina Ali, to the point that the Jewish man admitted that the armour was not his, but that he had found it. The Jewish man returned the armour to Sayidina Ali but was rejected because Sayidina Ali said that the justice system has ascertained and proved that he was not the owner of the armour and he must respect the judge's decision. This incident caused the Jewish man to become impressed with the values of justice of an Islamic leader. Madam, before I end my speech, I would like to share a pantun that we should all reflect on, especially for me. The island of Temasek was peaceful and tranquil, Its name was changed to Singapura, Act justly while in this world, For we will eventually answer to our Creator. 3.37 pm”
“I feel that the Syariah Court's jurisdiction needs to be widened to include proceedings relating to the issues of wakaf and nazar. Madam, this Bill mostly deals with the enhancements of the powers of the Majlis, as stated in the clauses mentioned earlier. It aims to reinforce institutions and improve the management of Muslim assets. I would like to once again state that I support this aim. However, I do feel some unease with efforts to give the Majlis, as an administrative entity, too much control or full control in the administration of Muslim assets and institutions. I would like to seek clarifications from the Minister so that I will no longer feel uneasy. Can the Minister clarify, if anyone among those being administered feel unhappy and would like to contest the decision taken by the Majlis on a particular matter, what are the available channels to do so? For instance, if there is a trustee or mutawalli whose appointment was removed by the Majlis but felt that the Majlis' decision was excessive and unfair, what action can this individual take? Madam, power is something that is entrusted to those who are given a responsibility in order to do their job more manageably, productively and effectively. At the same time, it is also true that power can be abused by anyone, whether they are the administrator or they are being administered, for whatever reasons. It is like a double-edged sword. In order to produce a community of excellence that is able and is respected, justice is one of the main pillars or thrusts. The laws created are meant to provide benefits to everyone and not only for certain people. I would like to share the story of an Islamic Caliph, that is, Sayidina Ali. He upheld and, more importantly, exemplified justice as a leader and an administrator.”
“Madam, I would like to touch on and give suggestions relating to clause 16(c) which introduces section 58(7), where it provides that a Court must not intervene or proceed with any proceedings relating to the appointment or removal of, (a) a trustee of a wakaf or nazar am appointed under an instrument of law; and (b) a mutawali appointed by the Majlis. As stated in this Bill, section 58(7) was introduced in accordance with a High Court case, that is, Mohamed Shariff Valibhoy and others vs Arif Valibhoy (2016). Among the reasons given in support of the introduction of this section 58 (7) are that, and I quote, in English: (In English): "Parliament could not have intended for the trustee of a wakaf to have recourse to the Court upon enactment of AMLA because: one, concurrent jurisdiction over the trustee by the Majlis and the Court may lead to inconsistent decisions being issued by the Majlis and the Court on the same issue and different standards and different laws being applied by the Majlis and the Court; two, AMLA vested title to wakaf property administrative control over a wakaf solely in the Majlis; and three, section 63 limits the jurisdiction of the Court to issues that are directed to the Court by the Majlis." (In Malay): Madam, I understand the reason behind the intended changes. However, I feel that it is better that the Court option is still made available, so that those who wish to present their case in Court can still do so. Nonetheless, I would like to suggest that proceedings relating to wakaf and nazar be referred to and decided by the Syariah Court and not the civil Courts. By referring it to the Syariah Court, this will overcome the issue of different jurisdiction and values between the Majlis and civil Courts that may be contradictory.”
“During that session, amongst the feedback received from the professionals and the asatizahs was the absence or lack of spiritual and religious values in the course syllabus. However, after the discussion, the syllabus was improved by including the feedback that was received. Madam, for the "Cinta Abadi" or "Love Forever" programme, the feedback that I received about the course content was that it did not contain or lacked religious and spiritual values. I would like to ask the Minister, is this true? If it is true, I hope that the Minister can clarify why this is so. The next matter that I would like to touch on is the enhancement or provision of more powers to the Majlis or MUIS in the administration of Muslim institutions and assets. As mentioned earlier in my speech, I concur that changing situations and circumstances may sometimes require administrative powers to be enhanced. Madam, here are some of the changes contained in this amendment Bill relating to the enhancement of the Majlis' powers in the administration of Muslim assets and institutions. Clause 16 amends section 58 to enhance the powers of the Majlis to administer any wakaf or nazar am. Clause 17 inserts a few new sections − 61(3), (4), (5) and (6). These newly introduced sections touch on enhanced powers given to the Majlis on the issue of financial control and administration of the wakaf and nazar am. Clause 18 amends section 74 to further enhance the powers of MUIS in the administration of every mosque in Singapore. Clause 18(a) replaces section 74(3) with the new sections 74 (3A) and (3B) that will, among other things, give additional powers to the Majlis to remove, and to appoint a mutawalli in place of, or in addition to, a trustee of a mosque appointed under a written instrument.”
“In that period of time, I had the opportunity to interact with many couples who attended marriage preparation courses, as well as married couples who were facing marital challenges. Based on my experience, I believe that a marriage preparation course is necessary. I believe that professionals and asatizahs who are involved in these two initiatives will wholeheartedly agree with my views. It is important that every individual who wishes to get married is equipped with knowledge that will help their effort to build a harmonious and strong marriage. We all know that, for Muslim couples, marriage is an act of religious devotion and it is akin to building a mosque. If we want to perform our prayers, we must know the essential steps, the requirements, as well as things that could nullify and taint the prayers. We must also seek knowledge on ways to refine our prayers and improve our concentration during prayers. The same goes for marriages – every couple must seek knowledge to ensure that their marriage is strong and stable. We have to recognise that marriage is an act of religious devotion and Muslim couples need to be equipped with knowledge to perform this act of religious devotion. In relation to marriage preparation courses, I would like to suggest that the content of such courses focuses more on religious and spiritual aspects because, as I have said earlier, the fact remains that marriage is an act of religious devotion. When I was initially assigned as the educator for the marriage preparation programme "Bersama Mu" "With You" organised by the Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports in 2006, I attended a discussion session about the "Bersama Mu" programme before it was officially launched.”
“Madam, I will deliver my speech in Malay. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] The AMLA amendment Bill, being tabled is aimed at reinforcing Muslim institutions, enhancing the management of the Muslim community's assets and strengthening Muslim families by fine-tuning and improving the current processes and laws so that it corresponds to changing circumstances and is more up-to-date. I believe that the changes made are intended to provide more benefits for the good of the Muslim community in Singapore. I support this intent wholeheartedly. I would like to touch on a few things contained in this amendment Bill. I have a few questions that require clarifications and I would also like to put forth a few suggestions. First, I would like to touch on clause 23 that introduces section 94(A) which requires any couple that fall within a certain classification to compulsorily attend and complete a marriage preparation course or programme before the couple can apply to a Kadi or Naib Kadi for the solemnisation of their marriage. I understand this is meant for couples who are under the age of 21 years old. It is a good and much welcomed measure so that young couples will be more informed about marital issues in order to be well prepared spiritually, mentally and psychologically before they enter marriage. I would like to suggest that this requirement be not only mandated for couples who are under the age of 21 years old, but for marriage preparation courses or programmes to be mandated for every couple who wish to build a stable marriage. Madam, I used to serve as a marriage course counsellor for two years and also conducted counselling for referral cases from the Syariah Court under the MCP programme for four years.”
“Thank you, Madam. I just like to address one point that was brought up by the Minister. He mentioned that public consultations, including in this Chamber, are not the right places to discuss such matters. I believe that this is the best platform, an official platform for me as an elected Member of Parliament to bring up the issues. Indeed, last November, we did mention a very sensitive issue regarding having a Malay or minority to be elected as the Head of State. I believe that is a sensitive issue that was discussed openly in Parliament. Again, the result was to proceed with the reserved Elected President based on, to brush aside the perspective that a Malay cannot assume the highest position in the state both by the Malays themselves as well as the non-Malays. So, I believe this is the right platform for me to bring up. If not here, where else, can I, as an elected Member of Parliament, voice out the concerns of the community? Thank you, Madam.”
“The Minister has not answered my question of an example of where I have caused discord and divisiveness. On what Minister mentioned earlier about the issue faced by the community being not easy to resolve, hence, I have been asking persistently and consistently for the Government to address the issue. That is the point that I have been making since I was elected and I have even started to make this point after the Suara Musyawarah Report was made public, based on that concern voiced in that report, as a basis for my point that I bring up in Parliament.”
“Madam, I would like to clarify the point made by the Minister. Firstly, I am not hiding behind my usage of my national language. It is the Malay language, it is the national language and it is my mother tongue. I am proud to use my national language in my speech. Secondly, I would like to again ask the Minister if he provide to me or explain or share with me or share with the House any specific, particular situation where I tried to cause discord or divisiveness. What I have been asking since I was elected in this House is for the Government to address the issue. I called for a committee to be formed, a commission to be formed to look into the concerns of the Malay community. How does that cause divisiveness and discord? I have not imposed any of my thoughts and I did not mention even for the sake of the Muslim community we have to compromise the national or the social cohesiveness or integration. So, I would like to ask the Minister can he provide, can he explain any examples where I am sowing discord and divisiveness.”
“Madam, I would like to clarify some of the points made by the Minister who is trying to paint a negative image of myself. Madam, firstly, I disagree with Minister's claim that I am causing discord and divisiveness. My point is that I choose to use Parliament as a platform, an official platform as an elected Member, to voice out the community's concerns. I did not choose or post any kind of comment, negative comment, on social media, even though I have my own Facebook page but I did not choose to do that because I know such matters are better discussed officially. So, I believe that as a Member of Parliament, elected through the GRC system, I do have the right to voice the concern. Some of the concerns that I have voiced out, for example, the halal kitchen issue, was not initiated by me but was mentioned by Minister for Defence Dr Ng Eng Hen. I was just reiterating what he had mentioned and asked him for clarification on whether there would be effort made to address that issue. As for the point that the Minister made on Zulfikar, I was there to support the "Wear White" movement. I just want to repeat one more time: I was there to support the "Wear White" movement. I am not so sure what is behind Minister's mind when he tried to link me to Zulfikar. I am a bit distraught by his effort to paint me negatively when what I was trying to do was to voice out the concerns of the community on an official platform and avoid myself from being entangled in this kind of discussion on the social media platform. So, I believe that I have explained enough and I would appreciate if the Minister would be more positive in his remarks towards me.”
“Madam, I thank the Member for his clarification. First, I would like to answer his point on my personal view. As a Muslim husband and a father to a daughter, yes, it is an obligation for Muslim women to don hijab in whatever circumstances. In terms of the Party's stance on this, the Workers' Party had actually issued a statement sometime in November 2013. The gist of the statement is that Workers' Party does not oppose wearing of tudung, but we call for more dialogues amongst the stakeholders as well as the larger community and it should be based on mutual understanding. 3.22 pm”
“Madam, this House has repeatedly discussed about building an inclusive society in Singapore, where every community, despite living in a multi-cultural and multi-religious society, are able to feel that their concerns and aspirations are given due attention. As a Singapore Muslim, a husband as well as a father to a daughter, I appeal to the Government to make into reality this call for inclusiveness that is often heard in this Chamber. My hope is that the Government will reconsider the Muslim community's request for Singapore Muslim women to be given the chance to fulfil their career aspirations and, at the same time, meet their religious obligations. Madam, I would like to end my speech with these words of wisdom: "Women are the pillars of a nation. If the pillars are strong, so will be the nation. And if the pillars are weak, so, too, the nation." Madam, a country where family, social and cultural values, as well as Government policies are inclined towards empowering women, will produce a nation strong in every aspect − family, social and economy. 3.11 pm”
“In facing a hectic and challenging life, couples must be prepared to help one another in bringing up their children, household chores and also personal development, for instance, pursuing further education, as well as advancement in their respective careers. Married couples, especially husbands as the head of the household, should fashion themselves as a counselling and motivational expert to their spouses so that they will be able to provide moral, emotional and spiritual support and be the motivator for their partners to strive with perseverance and confidence. Such husbands will help their wives become more motivated and positive in balancing and fulfilling their familial and career aspirations. Madam, the last matter I would like to bring up is the aspirations of Singapore Muslim women. We have heard spirited speeches from hon Members to convince the House to unanimously support the Motion that is being tabled, that is, to affirm and support Singapore women in fulfilling their familial and career aspirations. I hope that Members in this House will not exclude Muslim women who wish to fulfil their career aspirations in line with their religious obligations, that is, allowing the use of the headscarf or tudung in the nursing and uniformed vocations, such as the Home Team and the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF). Madam, many countries like Australia, UK and the US allow the use of the headscarf for Muslim women in their uniformed organisations so as to allow their Muslim women to fulfil their religious obligations whilst fulfilling their career aspirations. My question is, when will Singapore take a similar step?”
“Stranded in these situations, single mothers should not be further burdened with difficulties to seek out proper and affordable homes. Madam, many Members of this House, past and present, have voiced their concern on the impact of this criterion imposed under the public rental scheme and I believe this concern has prevailed for years. I shall not belabour this point as I believe that the HDB is aware of it. Many hope that this criterion will be revoked and exemptions given to single mothers who have gone through divorce. It is also hoped that HDB will outline policies that are more inclined to help and empower single mothers in their efforts to meet their basic living needs, that is, a conducive and affordable home, especially while they and their children struggle through this challenging time. A more positive support from HDB will enable single mothers to fulfil their familial and career aspirations. Madam, the second matter I would like to touch upon is the role of husbands in nurturing a more favourable and supportive cultural value at home for their wives so that they can balance their familial responsibilities and careers. I will share this perspective based on my experience as a family and marriage counsellor and also as a husband. Madam, marriage is a life partnership where husbands and wives are partners looking to achieve a harmonious and strong family. The values that should be inculcated in order to achieve such a family comprises mutual respect, trust in one another and understanding. These values have to be nurtured, practised and instilled within a family.”
“This is a very encouraging change and is well-received by Singaporeans who are very concerned about single mothers. I hope that these policy changes made last year do not end there but instead represent an initial step for the Government to continue helping this group. Madam, apart from alleviating their financial burden, many of these single unwed mothers also hope for a change to HDB's housing policy. A home is one of the basic requirements for every person. The lack of a proper dwelling will affect the quality of life and human development as well as the family's development. For this group of people, they are not allowed to buy a house under the family nucleus scheme as children born out of wedlock are not regarded as part of a family nucleus. They are only eligible to buy a house under the "single" scheme, which has an age limit of 35 years and above. Unfortunately, a majority of these single unwed mothers are not even 35 years old, and, hence, do not fulfil this age requirement. They are also not allowed to rent a flat under the Public Rental Scheme based on the same reason, that is, their children are not regarded as part of a family nucleus. Madam, one of the conditions under the Public Rental Scheme is that renting of flats is not allowed for a period of 30 months following the sale of a flat, which then becomes a barrier to divorced single mothers seeking proper and affordable dwellings. Lamentations of "misfortunes seldom come alone" are often heard amongst these single mothers. Not only do they have to bear mental and emotional stress while undergoing divorce and being abandoned by their husbands, they now have to strive relentlessly to fulfil their responsibilities as their family's caregivers and breadwinners.”
“Mdm Speaker, I will deliver my speech in Malay. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Madam, in discussing the Motion that is being tabled, that is, "Aspirations of Singapore Women", various integrated and collective efforts must be made to support Singapore women in achieving these aspirations. The Government, community, family and every individual must play their respective roles. Madam, in my speech, I would like to discuss three matters on the efforts to empower Singapore women so that they will be able to fulfil their familial and career aspirations and be more prepared for the future. Firstly, I would like to touch on several policy changes which the Government should embark upon to help women who are categorised the "vulnerable group" or the single mothers facing life's trials and tribulations. Secondly, the role of husbands in nurturing a more favourable and supportive cultural value at home so that their wives are able to balance their familial and career responsibilities, and, lastly, regarding the aspirations of Singapore Muslim women. Madam, as many are aware, the lives of single mothers are extremely challenging. They are both the caregivers and the breadwinners. The difficulties faced by single mothers should receive concern from all quarters, including the Government. Government policies should be more directed towards alleviating the burden shouldered by this group. Madam, in April last year, the Government made two positive policy changes to assist and alleviate the challenges and burden of single unwed mothers. The Child Development Account (CDA) scheme was extended to children born out of wedlock and the 16-week maternity leave was also extended to these single mothers, similar to other mothers.”
“Singapore Football Madam, I have two questions for the Ministry with regard to Singapore football. Firstly, I have asked the Ministry during the COS debate in 2015 for an update on FAS' goal for Singapore football. The last goal was set in 1988 by our former Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong, a popular one, indeed, Goal 2010, to qualify for the World Cup 2010. In reply, the Ministry said that there is a taskforce that is looking at setting out the goals and strategic directions for Singapore football in the coming years. May I have an update on what has been done so far and whether there is any goal set? Madam, my second question is on FAS. In the Ministry's reply to my colleague Ms Sylvia Lim's query during the debate on the President's Address on 29 January 2016, it was mentioned that FAS would be having their annual general meeting (AGM) in June 2016. As reported in the media on 8 November 2016, FAS had an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) a day before, which was on 7 November, and the meeting had decided to postpone its first-ever election of the Council for 30 years to a date before May this year. Can the Ministry share the exact date for the FAS Council election and, two, what causes the delay in the election of the FAS Council? Leadership and Passion”
“Madam, our former which is also our first National Stadium was opened in July 1973 and officially closed on 30 June 2007. For a period of 34 years, the former National Stadium had lived up to its name and status as a national icon. It has hosted a total of 18 National Day Parades (NDPs), two Southeast Asian Peninsular (SEAP) Games and one Southeast Asian (SEA) Games, and many memorable sporting tournaments, such as the Malaysia Cup. Our National Stadium was also the birthplace of our popular Kallang Wave. I think everyone can attest to the fact that our former National Stadium had brought Singaporeans together, feeling the oneness, shedding tears of joy and despair, especially during the soccer matches that involved our national football team. Our current National Stadium is built on a public-private partnership model. It has been open for almost three years. Within this period, there had been media reports citing challenges faced by event organisers as well as some of our national sports associations (NSAs), such as the Football Association of Singapore (FAS), to secure the National Stadium for our football matches involving our national team. There was also a media report on what the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF), as the NDP organiser, had to go through challenging negotiations with Sports Hub Pte Ltd for the 2016 NDP. I understand one of the challenging factors faced by the event organisers and our NSAs is the rental fee. I do hope that the Ministry will be able to facilitate in mitigating the present challenges faced by event organisers and our NSAs, especially FAS, so that 30 years down the road, Singaporeans will have the same recollections of fond and nostalgic memories similar to that of our first National Stadium.”
“Minister Yaacob said, I quote, "The Malay community is concerned not just about the President but also Malay Permanent Secretary, Malay General because we want to see representation across the entire Singaporean life." To add on to the Minister's point, I would also like to say that the Malay/Muslim community is also concerned about Muslim ladies not being able to wear the tudung while serving in our uniformed groups − SAF, Home Team and nursing. As I have mentioned earlier, when there is a will, there is a way. I do sincerely hope that the Government will address the Malay/Muslim community's concerns in entirety. Emigration of Singapore Citizens”
“Madam, in November last year, this House debated on the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (Amendment) Bill. One of the contentious issues debated was on the proposal to have a reserved minority Presidential Election. The Constitutional Commission has mooted this proposal as they viewed that there is a need to address the issue of perceptions of minorities not able to access the highest office in the land. The House was divided on this issue and so was the nation. Those who supported this proposal argued that it is necessary to do so to symbolise Singapore's Constitution of multiculturalism. As for those who opposed it, the argument is that such implementation will undermine the principle of meritocracy. The decision to have a reserved Presidential Election for the Malay community, to me and also to many, has, to a certain extent, compromised the principle of meritocracy. I am also of the view that the approach taken by the Government in mitigating the issue of perception of inequality by implementing a reserved Presidential Election for Malays shows that if the Government has the will to do and chooses to do it, it can be done. I have said this a few times and I am going to repeat it again. One of the concerns of the Malay/Muslim community that is still lingering in our mind is the feeling of being discriminated, not being given equal and fair opportunity. An example − there are still concerns from the community that a Malay individual is not able to assume the rank of a General in the army, a Permanent Secretary in the Ministries. Minister Yaacob acknowledged these concerns during his interaction with tertiary students at a recent REACH-organised event.”
“So, whatever support we have given to the Joint Madrasah System (JMS) madrasahs is also extended to the other three remaining madrasahs. Once the details are out on how we can work together to ensure that the lease for the space for Madrasah Wak Tanjong has been approved, we will announce the details.”
“Madam, thank you allowing me to seek clarifications. I have two clarifications for the Minister. Firstly, I would like to ask regarding MUIS rendering assistance to Madrasah Wat Tanjong Islamiyah in terms of renewing its land lease. Madam, before that, I would like to declare that I have a child studying in Madrasah Wat Tanjong. I just want to know what is the update on the assistance rendered to Madrasah Wat Tanjong at the current moment. Can I know which fund is MUIS tapping on? Thirdly, can I also know whether there are any terms and conditions attached to this assistance? My second clarification is regarding ARS. Can I get a clarification from the Minister whether religious teachers from schools of thoughts other than from the mazhab will be officially recognised under ARS? Assoc Prof Dr Yaacob Ibrahim: I thank the Member for the two questions. On the second question, we will consider all legitimate schools of thought which are recognised under the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). For example, I have already mentioned in my response on mandatory ARS that we will look also to include the Jafari Shia group which is recognised by OIC. To the Member's first question, I cannot reveal the full details. Things are under negotiations. We recognise that we want to assist Madrasah Wak Tanjong because it is part of our entire madrasah ecosystem. The lease issue is a bit complicated. There are details which have been worked out between MUIS and the Madrasah Wak Tanjong. But suffice for me to say that our first principle is to ensure that Madrasah Wak Tanjong continues to exist. Secondly, that Madrasah Wak Tanjong continues to receive the support from MUIS to upgrade its curriculum which we have been doing thus far.”
“Madam, I would just like to mention that the issue I mentioned about the General was actually a quotation from Minister Yaacob.”
“I am also of the view that the decision to hold a reserved Presidential Election as an effort to address the issue of negative perceptions, shows that "where there is a will, there is a way." I have said many times before in this Chamber that among the aspirations or concerns of the Malay/Muslim community in Singapore is the sense or perception of discrimination that there are no equal and fair opportunities. For instance, there are still concerns among our community about Malay/Muslim individuals not being given equal opportunities to hold the rank of General in the army or a Permanent Secretary in a Ministry. Minister Yaacob spoke about and acknowledges this concern. During a dialogue session organised by the Feedback Unit's Reaching Everyone for Active Citizenry @ Home (REACH), the Minister said in English that "The Malay community is concerned not just about the President, but also Malay Permanent Secretary, Malay General... because we want to see representation across the entire Singaporean life". I would like to add that the Malay/Muslim community is also concerned about Muslim women being allowed to wear the tudung when serving in uniformed groups like the army, the Home Team and nursing. As I said before, Madam, "where there's a will, there's a way." I sincerely hope that the Government can do something to address the concerns of the community. Promoting Lifelong Learning”
“(In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] Last November, this Chamber debated the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (Amendment) Bill. One of the issues that received attention and was hotly debated was the recommendation to hold a Presidential Election reserved for a minority race. The Constitutional Commission made this recommendation because they felt the need to address the issue of perception that a minority race cannot assume the highest office in the land, that is, the office of President. This Chamber and Singaporeans were divided into two groups: those who supported it and those who did not support it. Those who agreed with the recommendation for a Presidential Election reserved for minorities argued that it is necessary to do so in order to signify and represent Singapore's multiracial constitution. For those who opposed, the argument is that its implementation will weaken the principle of meritocracy. Madam, Parliament, except the Workers' Party Members of Parliament (MPs), resolved to accept the recommendation to hold a Presidential Election reserved for a minority race, in support of the Constitutional Commission's view that a Presidential Election reserved for a minority race will address the issue of negative perceptions that minorities are not qualified to occupy the highest office in the land. During the same debate, the Prime Minister announced that the upcoming Presidential Elections will be reserved for Malays. The decision taken to reserve the Presidential Election for Malays, to me and also to many others, undeniably compromises the principle of meritocracy.”
“Sir, the Assistive Technology Fund provides means-tested subsidies of up to 90% for persons with disabilities to purchase assistive technology devices, such as motorised chairs, wheelchairs, hearing aids and screen readers. The fund has a fixed lifetime cap of $40,000 per person. While the changes that have been made to the scheme are encouraging, we believe that the Assistive Technology Fund can be enhanced if the financial burden for persons with disabilities and special needs is over their lifetime. Somebody who is diagnosed with special needs or has a disability from a young age will use up the grant much faster than a person who is diagnosed later in life, as will a person whose disability may require more expensive assistive devices. If required, is it possible for the Ministry to assess the needs of these individuals on a case-by-case basis and exercise flexibility, even if they have exceeded the cap? The purpose of the fund will be better served if it can be made more flexible to take into consideration the lifetime needs of individuals. It is also stated that after the approval of an application to use the fund, touchpoints such as hospitals and VWOs, will assist individuals to purchase the devices and reimbursement will either be made to the touchpoint or to the vendor. Will it be more cost effective for SG Enable to consolidate these orders, so that it can negotiate with vendors and pass cost savings to the end-consumers? The benefits of bulk purchasing of assistive technology devices could be extended to those whose household income puts them just above the income eligibility cap but who will still find it onerous to fork out thousands of dollars for an assistive device. Disability Caregiver Support Centre”
“As for my suggestion, can each SSO produce a mini directory with a map on all the social and community services available within its boundary so as to better assist residents, especially elderly residents to locate the services? Women's Charter Maintenance Payments”
“This is to emulate part of discretionary assistance under PA to extend additional coverage support for SMTA recipients who are unable to qualify for additional welfare programmes. 5.30 pm Update on Social Service Office Madam, the establishment of Social Service Office (SSO) in 2013 is with the objectives to provide better accessibility for low-income families who need assistance and also to play a role in integrating the social service delivery in their respective towns. I would appreciate if the Minister can provide updates on the SSO meeting its objectives, in particular, its role in integrating social service delivery. In addition, I have two questions and one suggestion to make. First, in reply to my 2013 Parliamentary Question (PQ) on whether SSO will be staffed by social work-trained officers and what is the proposed number, the Ministry mentioned that some of the staff may have social work training. It was further mentioned that the Ministry will provide the requisite training to enable all staff to perform their roles. Can the Minister share how many of the current SSO officers are social work-trained and also what are some of the requisite training provided to the staff? [Deputy Speaker (Mr Charles Chong) in the Chair] Secondly, whether SSO practises making referrals to ECDA to assist with childcare matters, such as placement and grant assistance, for low-income young parents who are open to seeking employment? I am asking this because I have come across many such cases where these young parents are receiving financial assistance from SSO but came to me to seek help with childcare placement.”
“Madam, ComCare Short-to-Medium-Term Assistance (SMTA) currently includes help for rental, utilities, S&CC, monthly cash grants, medical assistance and employment assistance, such as training. However, there are SMTA recipients who still struggle with additional expenses and who have few alternatives to turn to. Although SMTA is able to cover basic daily expenses, it is still lacking in terms of ad hoc big-ticket expenses, for example, repairing of damaged household appliances or items and repairing damaged spectacles. These are expenses that do not occur daily but can rack up substantial costs when they do. I would like to ask the Minister if he will set up a special claims fund to provide additional assistance for ad hoc repairs and one-off expenses. This can be modelled on the discretionary assistance under Public Assistance. I am putting up two recommendations for consideration. First, allow recipients to claim up to 70% funding for ad hoc repair expenses, such as broken shoes, spectacles, damaged appliances, replacement of faulty light bulbs, up to a maximum claim of $300 annually. By allowing only up to 70% claim for annual repairs allowance, recipients still have to take responsibility for 30% of the expenses and the annual cap prevents excessive spending and abuse of the system. However, a more in-depth review should also be done to understand the amounts that these groups have to fork out for such expenses. Second, allow recipients to claim a one-off 100% funding for household item purchases, such as beds, furniture and so on. This can have a maximum lifetime cap of up to $300 per recipient. For one-off claims, it will be administratively more efficient to allow a 100% claim, since it is only a one-time funding and cannot be reclaimed.”
“Madam, can I take the two cuts together?”
“Thank you, Madam. Madam, I have one clarification for Minister Khaw. He earlier mentioned that the implementation of the tiered ARF is to further suit the implementation of tiered ARF for cars in 2013, basically, to have some form of consistency. My clarification is, similarly, on the basis of consistency, would the Minister consider having PARF rebate for motorcycles? 2.30 pm”
“I welcome the move by the Ministry to exempt the contribution of motorcycles to a quota to the open COE category. Hopefully, this move may help to ease the motorcycle COE price dilemma. Madam, I still receive grievances expressed by motorcycle owners – specifically our fellow Singaporeans, who depend on their motorcycles for their family livelihoods – on the exorbitant motorcycle COE prices that have been going on for many years. I believe a more encompassing and inclusive measure can be introduced and implemented to regulate the motorcycle COE prices. I would like to reiterate my call made at last year's COS debate, that is, to break down the motorcycle COE according to the different engine capacity and also to allocate the number of quota according to the percentage of these motorcycles on our roads. If the COE for cars can be categorised in such a manner, why can it not be done for motorcycles? I still think it is one of the better ways to mitigate the issue of high motorcycle COE prices. 12.15 pm I have two clarifications for the Ministry. First, observers and commentators viewed the introduction of tiered ARF as being meant to mitigate the high motorcycle COE prices. Can I have the Minister's confirmation as this was not mentioned explicitly during Minister Heng's Budget Speech. If the answer is yes, how can this be achieved and, if no, what is the actual purpose of this implementation? Secondly, with a tiered ARF imposed on motorcycles, would the Ministry consider having paid Preferential Additional Registration Fee (PARF) rebate for motorcycles, similar to that for cars? Effective Government-business Communication”
“Sir, I have been receiving feedback from a number of Kaki Bukit residents mentioning that their blocks' newly-built lifts constructed under LUP is warm and stuffy, especially during hot days. Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (AHTC) has also been receiving similar feedback from residents living in other parts of the town. The Town Council has conducted checks on the in-car fan system for these respective lifts and found that everything is good and running well. After much observation, it was suspected that the metal lift shaft might be the main contributing factor. AHTC had highlighted the matter to HDB twice, informing that the warm air might be due to the metal lift shaft which resulted in conduction of heat, hence, causing the air inside the lift to be warm. I am quite confident this could be the reason because, for Kaki Bukit ward, the affected residents who feedback on this issue stay in blocks where the lift shafts are exposed to the direct afternoon sun. During my recent house visit to one of the affected blocks, a resident expressed concern over this matter. He cited an example of a man trapped in such a situation during a hot day. The trapped passenger, especially one who is an elderly or an individual who has medical conditions, may experience related complications, such as dehydration, respiratory problems and, in the worst-case scenario, a heat stroke, due to the condition of the lift. Sir, I do hope HDB could address this issue so as to avoid any unwanted incidences. HDB Tree Replacement Guidelines”
“First, what is the actual number of Singaporeans who have successfully found jobs through the Jobs Bank in each year since its inception in 2014? Secondly, what proportion of the overall number of postings is there in the Jobs Bank? Enhancing the Jobs Bank”
“Madam, the national jobs bank was set up in 2014 to support the implementation of the Fair Consideration Framework and is set to evolve into an online marketplace for jobs that helps to map career ladders in different industries and offers recommendations on the types of scales and trainings workers require to get the jobs they want. I have two recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of the Jobs Bank in facilitating job-matching. First, a key challenge in job-matching is ensuring that there is a match between an employee's skill and the job requirements as well as between expectation of employers and employees regarding the job. The Jobs Bank can enhance skills matching by allowing jobseekers who have just completed training courses to be automatically directed to job openings that require those skills. This dynamic matching does not only facilitate the job hunting process, but it will also help jobseekers recognise the value of learning new skills. Second, I would like to propose that non-Workforce Skills Qualification (WSQ) training providers be subject to a certification standard TrainTrust which can be modelled on EduTrust. To encourage providers to come on board, courses and providers that are TrainTrust-certified can be given priority on the list of courses that are recommended to Jobs Bank users. A certification standard will go some way in ensuring the quality of skills learnt has strengthened the trust of the potential employers in the courses attended or certification obtained by the jobseekers. It will provide a reassurance to jobseekers on the values of the certification that they are spending time and effort to earn. In addition, I also have two questions for the Minister.”
“Madam, from my own knowledge, the verses in the Quran are always in the context of showing mercy to the people and universe.”