Ng Eng Hen
Singapore
“I think we try to keep this virtuous state of affairs as long as we can to make sure that we can invest steadily. Year-to-year fluctuations would occur, whether it is economic, not so much in COVID-19, but remember the Global Financial Crisis? Everybody needs to take a haircut. If you have to take a haircut, you have to take a haircut.”
“Mr Chairman, as the World around us becomes more unpredictable and changes, the more we need to keep the strongest commitment to strengthen our own defences and, if needed, we must be willing to do more. Singapore celebrates 60 years of Independence this year.”
“MINDEF will continue to work with partners to encourage Singaporeans to raise their digital literacy, develop and maintain good cybersecurity habits, protect sensitive data and guard against scams, fake news and disinformation so as to make the digital domain a safer and more secure space.”
“The Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) conducts regular mobilisation exercises (MOBEX) of our National Service (NS) forces. In a silent mobilisation, NSmen are notified through their personal contact numbers. Open mobilisations include the broadcast of unit code-words through mass media.”
“In 2020, the Ministry of Defence replied to a Parliamentary Question on this matter that the relocation of Paya Lebar Air Base (PLAB) would likely occur around 2030 or beyond, after Changi Air Base and Tengah Air Base have been expanded to house the existing assets at PLAB.”
“When incidents or near-misses happen, as it did where one Hunter armoured fighting vehicle rear-ended another during Exercise Wallaby in Australia, thorough investigations are conducted and lessons learnt shared across the units.”
The complete record
Every one of 2,266 lines we hold for Ng Eng Hen, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 15 of 46.
“Mdm Speaker, I informed the House in November 2014 that the SAF would support the multinational coalition against the extremist threat posed by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS). I stated then the reasons for Singapore's participation in global efforts against terrorism. I would like to repeat what I said because I think there is resonance, given recent events in our region. I quote, "Singapore must resolutely oppose the spread of terrorism in order to safeguard our security here. It is in Singapore's interest to support the multinational efforts against ISIS and its attempts to export terrorism to our region, whether by sending foreign terrorists to carry out terrorist operations or by radicalising regional elements who engage in violence in Iraq, Syria and, subsequently, their home countries. If this terrorism threat is allowed to grow and spread, innocent civilians here and elsewhere could be endangered and killed." This was in 2014. Since then, there have been attacks in Paris, Istanbul and, most recently, Jakarta. The recent attacks in Jakarta and the arrests of 27 radicalised Bangladeshis in Singapore are unfortunate but stark examples that underscore this truth – as long as terrorist organisations can influence and induct others to their cause and do their bidding, no country is safe, not even countries which are located thousands of kilometres away. Terrorism, too, has globalised. An estimated 600 Southeast Asians have travelled to Iraq and Syria to take up arms with ISIS. In Malaysia, 129 people have been arrested to date for their suspected links to ISIS, including members of its own armed forces. Two Singaporean families have travelled to Syria to join ISIS since 2014 and we have detained five more Singaporeans last year for planning to join ISIS.”
“With the support and partnership of all Singaporeans, MINDEF and the SAF will continue to provide a strong defence to ensure our nation's peace and prosperity. Page: 27”
“As part of our efforts to deepen our network of bilateral partnerships, we will strengthen our cooperation with China through the 2014 Four-Point Consensus, implement the recently enhanced and revised Defence Cooperation Agreements with the US and India respectively, as well as conclude defence cooperation agreements with Australia as part of our Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. These partnerships help the SAF secure access to advanced defence technology as well as realistic and demanding training areas around the world. An open and robust regional security architecture is key to enhancing strategic trust and regional cooperation, to ensure continued peace and stability in our region. Singapore is not a claimant in the South China Sea territorial disputes, but our interest is to ensure all claims are settled peacefully and in accordance with international law. To this end, we will continue to work with partners to grow multilateral platforms, such as the Shangri-La Dialogue and the ASEAN Defence Ministers Meeting (ADMM)-Plus for strategic dialogue and practical cooperation. In May this year, Singapore will co-host the ADMM-Plus Maritime Security and Counter Terrorism Exercise involving all 10 ASEAN countries and eight key partners. The exercise will strengthen the region's capability in combating terrorism and practise the Code for Unplanned Encounters at Sea to reduce the risks of maritime incidents. We will also leverage on operational platforms, such as the Information Fusion Centre and the Changi Regional Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR) Coordination Centre, as well as use our Chairmanship of the ADMM in 2018, to foster a rules-based security architecture that underpins the peace and stability in our region.”
“To encourage employers and businesses to step up support for their NSman employees, we will launch the "NS Mark", an accreditation scheme to recognise companies with supportive human resource practices. Page: 26 NS has provided the backbone for Singapore's fighting force, ensuring that we have the security and stability necessary for Singapore's progress and prosperity. In 2017, we will celebrate the 50th anniversary of NS. We will plan a series of "NS50" activities to show appreciation and recognise the contributions of National Servicemen, past and present, as well as the wider community. Singaporeans' continued support for NS is instrumental to ensure the peace and security of our country for the next 50 years and beyond. There is broad-based societal support for NS and the launch of the SAF Volunteer Corps (SAFVC) has enabled the broader community, including women, first generation permanent residents and new citizens, to contribute to Singapore's defence. The inaugural cohort of 226 SAFVC volunteers completed their Basic Training in 2015, and some have been deployed as Auxiliary Security Troopers and as Bridge Watchkeepers for navigational duties on board Landing Ship Tanks. We are heartened by the positive response and will expand our efforts for the SAFVC. Singapore will continue to work closely with our neighbours and regional partners to enhance regional stability and deal with common security challenges.”
“Such technologies have the added benefit of greater precision while using less manpower, enabling the SAF to adapt to a shrinking workforce. MINDEF and the SAF will also develop new capabilities to defend against threats in the cyber domain. MINDEF recognises the importance of good stewardship in ensuring prudent spending. MINDEF takes a long-term view in developing the SAF's capabilities and will spend only what is needed to build up the SAF's capabilities to defend Singapore's sovereignty and security in an evolving and uncertain security environment. National Service (NS) remains the cornerstone of Singapore's defence and security. MINDEF has, therefore, invested significant effort into improving the NS experience. Over the past year, half of the 30 recommendations made by the Committee to Strengthen NS (CSNS) were implemented. Enlistment wait-time was reduced to allow more full-time National Servicemen (NSFs) to enter the workforce or further their studies earlier. Career fairs were enhanced to include a wider range of companies and Institutes of Higher Learning. NSFs who are interested in a science and engineering career in the SAF can consider the enhanced Science and Engineering Scholarships. This year, we continue the CSNS implementation efforts by launching initiatives that support our National Servicemen and celebrate key milestones in their lives. Gifts will be given to active National Servicemen who are newly married or have babies. We will provide basic life and personal accident insurance coverage for our National Servicemen. More National Servicemen who perform well during their NS training will receive gift vouchers to enjoy with their families.”
“The security landscape Singapore faces today is more complex than ever before. Many countries in our region are modernising their militaries against a backdrop of growing nationalism, difficult maritime and territorial disputes and persistent threats from terrorists and cyber attacks. In the past year, attacks in Sydney, Paris and Ankara underscore the challenges of keeping Singapore safe and secure. A strong and credible defence remains crucial for Singapore's security, independence and sovereignty. Today, the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) is a full-spectrum, networked force that is effective and flexible. Its operational readiness has been validated by deployments around the world to support regional and international operations, such as our deployments to the anti-ISIS coalition in the Middle East, the anti-piracy forces in the Gulf of Aden and to various countries for humanitarian assistance and disaster relief operations. The SAF will continue to participate in such deployments as part of its efforts to contribute to international peace and stability. However, the operating environment for MINDEF and the SAF is changing rapidly. Technologies that used to be the domain of professional militaries are becoming cheaper and easier to obtain and used by less advanced militaries and non-state actors. As our economy and society rely more on technology that allows us to function with ease and efficiency, cyber criminals and attackers have more avenues to disrupt and destabilise Singapore. To guard against the wider range of threats, the SAF will develop new fighting concepts and pursue technological advancements in areas, such as unmanned systems and robotics, to make the SAF more potent and flexible.”
“Better capabilities using infocomm technology, artificial intelligence and big data analytics are in the pipeline to enhance existing systems. Taken together, these capabilities will ensure that our networks are resilient with robust defence systems. Even as we develop emerging technologies, we will continue to build upon the strong foundations of the Third Generation SAF’s transformation. The Army will be more mobile and capable, with the number of units operating on wheeled or tracked platforms almost doubling in the next 10 to15 years. These units can influence areas up to three times larger, thereby multiplying the potency of our Army. This will include more Terrex Infantry Carrier Vehicles (ICVs) to deal with increasingly complex urban environments. Our first motorised infantry brigade, equipped with the Terrex ICVs, will achieve initial operating capability next year. The Army recently commissioned the new Peacekeeper Protected Response Vehicles. These vehicles will be networked with other SAF platforms so that they can collectively see more, see further and allow our soldiers to act more decisively. This significantly enhances the mobility, survivability and firepower of our soldiers. Page: 153”
“The Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) and Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) continually leverage technology to keep SAF sharp and to modernise its capabilities. Ensuring that SAF remains a credible force against all prospective threats to Singapore for the future goes beyond type-for-type platform replacements. We are developing new innovative fighting concepts to fully exploit the potential of emerging technologies. New technologies, such as unmanned systems and robotics can multiply the combat effectiveness of our soldiers, allowing SAF to overcome our constraints of a limited population. Our Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems, which can stay airborne for more Page: 152 than 24 hours, can already provide persistent, near real-time situational awareness to our forces. This allows the SAF to see further, in greater resolution, and fight more effectively. Out at sea, we have been conducting trials of Unmanned Surface Vessels (USVs) and successfully tested their ability to patrol our congested waterways. In the future, our ships, paired with USVs, can efficiently and effectively protect a far larger area to secure our sea lines of communications. There is great potential for such technologies on land as well. Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs) may soon be used to conduct security patrols. With UGVs, we could reduce the number of guards on patrol, yet protect larger areas. Moving forward, such UGVs could assist our soldiers in ensuring that key installations and infrastructure remain safe from the threat of attack. Threats are also evolving in non-traditional domains, like cyber, and the SAF has to remain vigilant to guard against threats to our military networks. New units for cyber defence are being raised and our Cyber Defence Operations Hub (CDOH) is also being enhanced.”
“Madam, I agree and it is to our interest, to SAF's interest, to make sure that the people we have, we avail them of the opportunities to serve, so that they can move up the hierarchy. We are short of manpower and we have to make use of everybody we have, and I agree with Ms Irene Ng that we have to make sure that not only do they have the opportunities to be promoted, but that they are given the postings to prove themselves – I think that is the main point. As long as it is gender-neutral, people have their opportunities, and it was in this vein that I said that our practices comply with the UN CEDAW, that there is no discrimination in our practices against women.”
“Madam, I do not see why not. As I said, opportunities are open to them. We promote based on merit and if a particular recommendation comes across my desk that this woman is deserving to be Chief of Navy, Chief of Army, Chief of Air Force or Chief of Defence Force, I will say yes if she deserves it. For political office, it is not my purview, so I will let the Prime Minister decide that.”
“Indeed, our servicewomen have contributed significantly to our national defence and keeping our skies, seas and homeland safe. Today, we have 1,500 uniformed servicewomen serving in SAF, about 7% of our Regulars. Many of them have also contributed to the success of our multinational peace support operations overseas, such as in Afghanistan and the Gulf Page: 29 of Aden. MINDEF and SAF are committed to provide a challenging and fulfilling career, which Ms Ellen Lee asked about, and help our Regulars realise their full potential. To do this, we recognise that we have to support our people's life-cycle needs. In keeping with our national workforce policies, our human resource (HR) policies have progressed over time to be able to accommodate flexibly and support these needs, for example, when they get married or when they become parents. As a result of these incremental changes to create a supportive work environment, that is how servicewomen are able to have fulfilling careers in MINDEF and SAF. I am happy to also tell Members that our practices are in line with international agreements that Singapore is a party to, such as the United Nations (UN) Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). SAF seeks to bring in more good, capable women to serve in the military, with career schemes that are designed to appeal to a diverse range of career interests. We are committed to provide a fulfilling profession for our servicewomen, and we look forward to women's continued contributions towards Singapore's defence.”
“Madam, in response to the Member's question, deployment and advancement within the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) is meritocratic and based on the principle of "best person for the job", regardless of gender, race, religion or other personal characteristics. Over the years, the servicewomen in the SAF have made good progress across all our career schemes. We have quite a number of them and they serve in a diverse range of vocations. We have women Guards Commanders, women Naval Divers and Fighter Pilots. And a good number have also risen to helm key positions – Department Heads, Battalion Commanders, Brigade Commanders, and Division Sergeant Majors. Let me give Members a few examples. Senior Warrant Officer (SWO) Jennifer Tan – Members would have remembered seeing her in this year's National Day Parade (NDP) as she came in with her children in a tank. She is in our 2nd People's Defence Force (2PDF) and is the SAF's first female Division Sergeant Major and also the first female Parade Regimental Sergeant Major for the NDP in 2011. We have Military Expert 6 (ME6) Sima Rai who is the Commanding Officer of 6th Army Maintenance Base, which performs engineering and maintenance work on various platforms, such as the Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS). In fact, her unit was named the best Combat Service Support unit for four consecutive years. In 2005, Col Karen Tan was our first servicewoman to be promoted to the rank of Colonel when she was Commander, Central Manpower Base (CMPB). Many of you would be familiar, recently in July this year, we had our first female Brigadier-General, Head of Air Intelligence and Director (Special Projects) Brigadier General (BG) Gan Siow Huang.”
“The feedback from National Servicemen to the new Individual Physical Proficiency Test (IPPT) format has been positive. More than 90% of National Servicemen polled believe the new IPPT format would be more convenient to train for. Since implementation on 1 April 2015, over 95% of NSmen who attempted the IPPT have opted for the three-station test format. The points system of the new IPPT format was designed to encourage National Servicemen to achieve their best for each station. National Servicemen who took the new IPPT showed an average improvement of five sit-ups for the sit-up station and an average improvement of 21 seconds for the 2.4-km run. For the recently introduced push-ups, 73% of National Servicemen achieved average and above performance. These findings indicate that the change in format has motivated our National Servicemen to take greater ownership of their physical fitness and improved their performance. The IPPT provides a uniform test to measure the basic fitness levels of all National Servicemen. The SAF ensures that National Servicemen keep physically fit and the IPPT complements our current combat fitness programme. For combat effectiveness, the SAF has introduced programmes to achieve its goals for various vocations. For instance, the Commandos have a customised combat fitness programme which includes vocation-related exercises, long route marches and combat obstacle course training. These courses condition the Commandos to meet their demanding combat roles.”
“Over the last 10 years, about 400 pre-enlistees with severe mental health disorders have been exempted from NS annually. The SAF has a team of over 1,200 psychiatrists, counsellors, para-counsellors and psychologists who deal with issues related to mental health. The ratio of psychiatrists within the SAF is more than twice that of the national population. In addition, the SAF draws upon the resources in our national healthcare system, including the Institute of Mental Health (IMH) and psychiatric departments in restructured hospitals. Page: 91 In consultation with the SAF Psychiatry Specialist Advisory Board, comprising senior psychiatrists from public hospitals, we will ensure that our National Servicemen receive good care during NS.”
“Mdm Speaker, the Prime Minister will make a Statement at the conclusion of Question Time to address some issues in respect of Question Nos 1 to 5. Can I, therefore, request that these questions be deferred and left to his Statement?”
“Mdm Speaker, I want to thank you for presiding over this special session to pay tribute to the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew. I want to thank the various Members of this House for being here. Mdm Speaker, I would like, on our behalf, to acknowledge the presence of Mr Lee Kuan Yew's family members – our Prime Minister, Mdm Ho Ching, his other children, Lee Hsien Yang and Dr Lee Wei Ling, his siblings and his extended family. Mdm Speaker, we want to acknowledge their presence as well as to send our deepest condolences to the family of Mr Lee Kuan Yew. We would also like to tell you – from all the speeches that you have heard – that Mr Lee Kuan Yew made an enormous contribution as the founding father of our nation. We want to thank you for sharing him with us and express again our deepest condolences.”
“" "Mr Lee, I am sorry that they had to wait so long. I can just hear his reprimand in my ear. My Cabinet colleagues walked through the crowds thanking our people for their patience. Singaporeans smiled, replied that the wait was little compared to what you have done for them. Employers let off workers who skipped meals to pay respects. Volunteers distributed food and drink to people in line. Parents brought their little children along, determined that their children should know who had been responsible for our good lives here. Senior citizens hobbled on walking sticks or on wheelchairs to say good-bye and thank you personally, despite their physical infirmities. Mr Lee, all these Singaporeans, young and old, whose lives you have touched – it is they who matter, as you always said, and who have pronounced the final judgement on your life's work. It is a great work that has surpassed all Page: 17 expectations. It is called Singapore and filled with Singaporeans who love and revere you. Majulah Singapura. Rest in peace." [Applause.] 4.32 pm”
“We must maintain, as he put it, "restless minds, forever probing and testing, seeking new and better solutions to old and new problems, (so) that we have never been, and I trust never shall be, tried and found wanting." We must aspire to these qualities that Mr Lee asked of us, because that would be the greatest tribute to the memory of Lee Kuan Yew, of what he stood for, fought against and desired for the good of Singapore and Singaporeans. There will not be another Lee Kuan Yew who made us better than we are or could be. Mr Lee Kuan Yew founded, moved and lifted a nation. Because of his unwavering devotion and a life poured out for Singapore, he has made all our lives better and for many generations to come. Few mortals have accomplished so much in their lifetime. We in this House are honoured to have lived and served with him. His legacy will live on through us and through this nation. Mr Lee Kuan Yew had his critics while alive. He was asked on a number of occasions how he thought history would judge him at the end. His reply would invariably be non-committal. Once he replied factually, "I would be dead by then". That was Mr Lee. But, today, we have the opportunity to tell Mr Lee, if he could hear us, and I believe he can: "Mr Lee, we would tell you that Singaporeans have decided. Thousands upon thousands lined the streets on your journey from Sri Temasek to this Parliament House. They queued for hours under the hot sun to pay their respects here. They did so spontaneously, an outpouring of gratitude and admiration for what you have done for their lives. I believe thousands more will do so when you move from here to your final resting place on Sunday. Singaporeans shouted your name repeatedly and clapped with adulation.”
“Parliament was sitting that year on 16 September, his birthday, and we wanted to acknowledge his 90th birthday, an auspicious birthday. I called on Mr Lee at the Istana and told him about our plans. He said he would be in Parliament that day on 16 September. Unfortunately, when that day came, a dehydrated and weakened Mr Lee had to go to hospital and be put on a drip. His doctors advised him not to attend Parliament. We were informed, so we called off our plans. But just before Parliament adjourned, we were surprised when Mr Lee entered the Chamber. I found out later that he over-ruled his doctors, saying that he must attend Parliament because he had given his commitment. He wanted to walk actually but, thankfully, his doctors persuaded him that it would be acceptable for a 90-year-old on intravenous nutrition to be wheeled into the Chamber. That 16 September, this House had the last privilege to wish him Happy Birthday together. After Parliament adjourned, he stayed on as we cut his birthday cake and sang him a birthday song. At age 90, frail and dehydrated, Mr Lee kept his word to be here. Great strength of character, determination and integrity. Lee Kuan Yew had all of these qualities and more. He kept his promises. What he said he would do, he would, and more – Page: 16 whether it was for individuals or an entire nation. As we honour his memory, we resolve to learn from his example to be men and women, individually and collectively as a nation, to have that great strength of character, integrity and determination. These values, as Mr Lee emphasised, would see us through difficult times.”
“Indeed, Mr Lee has had such a monumental impact on all Singaporeans that each would have his or her own special memory of him. I am sure all of us have one particular memory, or memories, of Mr Lee. You read the tributes, the artwork, the banners, the beautifully crafted posters by tens of thousands of Singaporeans at our tribute sites. Many others will certainly remember him as an internationally renowned great teacher and statesman. For myself, two personal encounters have left lasting impressions. In 2009, Mr Lee led a delegation on an official trip to many states of Malaysia. Deputy Prime Minister Tharman and I were part of it. The delegation was having dinner together – it was a long trip – when Mr Lee asked to excuse himself so that he could speak on the phone to Mrs Lee. Due to previous strokes, Mrs Lee could not speak but remained conscious and aware. Mr Lee had made it a routine to speak and read to her each night. He did not want to break this routine, even though he was in Malaysia on a long trip. He asked the nurse to put the phone to Mrs Lee and spoke to her. He did this every night while we were in Malaysia. We stood aside to respect their privacy, but that image of Mr Lee, hunched over the phone speaking to Mrs Lee who could not speak back, will stay with me for a very long time as a simple but pure picture of true devotion. Mrs Lee passed away in 2010 and the impact on him was visible physically. I think many people noticed this. Mr Lee had, indeed, become frail as he approached his 90th birthday in 2013. He had problems in swallowing and food would go down the wrong way into his windpipe, infecting his lungs repeatedly. As eating could cause aspiration pneumonia, he needed intravenous nutrition as supplement but became progressively thinner.”
“" Above all, Mr Lee believed that, ultimately, it was in the quality of its people and leaders that determined a nation's chances of success. Mdm Speaker had quoted what he said when Parliament moved in 1999. "…the importance of this Chamber did not, and does not, depend upon its size and its grandeur, but upon the quality of the men and women who occupy it as representatives of the people… By the standards of other public and private buildings in Singapore, it is modest by comparison. That is a virtue. Behind the understatement lie great strengths of character, integrity and determination. That is what will see Singapore through, not the grand monuments in brick and mortar or steel and concrete, with which so many other new nations try to impress themselves and their followers." Mr Lee never believed in the size of the chamber and its grandeur. He believed that the understatement lie great strength of character, integrity and determination. And that is what will see us through. Mr Lee never believed that physical monuments or towering edifices engendered or sustained greatness. He would brush aside these as foundations for our success. This past week, we have seen the glowing tributes to Mr Lee from leaders and on the front pages of newspapers from all over the world. Ministers and Members of Parliament from Australia and New Zealand have held special sessions in their Parliaments in Mr Lee's honour. World leaders are disrupting their schedules to come personally to attend his funeral service. This recognition is seldom given to even leaders of great countries, let alone a little red dot. Page: 15 I find it befitting and poetic that for one who did not believe in monuments, that Mr Lee Kuan Yew himself became Singapore's greatest icon.”
“" Eighty-six-year-old gentleman, doing his physiotherapy, reading the newspapers. Lesser mortals would have thought about other things, but Mr Lee decided he would have to make a speech in Parliament. Mr Lee went on to explain why the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore "enjoins us (the Government) to specifically look after the position of the Malays and other minorities". Our Constitution states expressly that it is a duty of the Government "not to treat everybody as equal. It is not reality, it is not practical, it will lead to grave and irreparable damage if we work on that principle." Page: 14 Lee Kuan Yew refused to be swayed by ideology that could not work. He considered these as "highfalutin ideas that misled Singaporeans". As a result, today, many countries come to Singapore to study how we have maintained our harmony in a multiracial society. But while Mr Lee held constant and firm to key fundamentals, he could change his own mind, if it made Singapore better. In 2005, he supported the proposal to build Integrated Resorts. He told this House why: "The old model on which I worked was to create a first-world city in a third-world region – clean, green, efficient, pleasant, healthy and wholesome, safe and secure for everyone. These virtues are valuable but no longer sufficient." "Singapore has to reposition itself in this world. …if you are in charge, if you are responsible for Singapore's future, for its well-being, for its vibrancy, for the kind of life Singapore can provide its people in 10, 20 years, can you say no? That is the question you have to answer…This is your choice. Surely, we must move forward and keep abreast of the top cities in Asia and the world.”
“In return for the people's trust and willingness to do what was needed, Mr Lee and his Government promised a better Singapore after these reforms – "more industries and more jobs…improved standards of education, health services, social amenities and housing for all." Again, the issues we talk about in Parliament today. As prescient as these words were, it seemed an unattainable dream when Mr Lee gave these promises in 1968. Singapore's per capita GDP then was around Myanmar today. It would take a further two decades of constant effort and continuous change, "seeking new and better solutions", as he put it, which included CPF reforms and the introduction of National Service in 1967. But at the end of it, Mr Lee and his Government delivered. Cabinet colleagues remember Mr Lee, our Mentor, often reminding us to under-promise and over-deliver. Say less and do more. What you promise, you must deliver and more. Mr Lee walked his talk. Even in his twilight years, Mr Lee kept a constant watch over Singapore's future in the world. Singapore's well-being was his obsession, as many of us know. Woe betide anyone who tried to knock it down. He was never complacent about our fundamentals and his singular passion was to make sure that Singapore remained well positioned for the future. In 2009, Mr Lee, then at 86 years, unexpectedly joined a debate on a Motion about equality in this House. He said, "Sir, I had not intended to intervene in any debate. But I was doing my physiotherapy just now and reading the newspapers and I thought I should bring the House back to earth... and remind everybody what is our starting point, what is our base, and if we do not recognise where we started from, and that these are our foundations, we will fail.”
“Amendments were made to Employment, Industrial Relations and Trade Unions Acts that put an end to the disruptive labour strikes. Bills were passed to build technical training institutes – the forerunners of today's ITE, Polytechnics and Universities – to educate and upgrade the skills of our workforce. Work hours were extended and the number of public holidays slashed. As you can imagine, none of these Bills was popular. Not one. All of us in Government and as Members of Parliament on the ground know how difficult it is to carry unpopular policies, even when they are right. Why did Mr Lee and his Government choose to persuade Singaporeans to do, again and again, what was necessary but painful? Mr Lee himself provided us the answer. He said in 1968 in this House: "If we were a soft community, then the temptation would be to leave things alone and hope for the best. Then, only good fortune can save us from the unpleasantness which reason and logic tell us is ahead of us. But we are not an easy-going people. We cannot help thinking, calculating and planning for tomorrow, for next week, for next month, for next year, for the next generation. And it is because we have restless minds, forever probing and testing, Page: 13 seeking new and better solutions to old and new problems, that we have never been, and I trust never shall be, tried and found wanting." Mr Lee spoke these words in 1968 to remind Singaporeans that unless they were willing to change and continuously adapt, even if it meant short-term pain, Singapore could not rise.”
“When another Member of Parliament followed and asked if economic aid from the British could ease the effects of the pull-out, Mr Lee's quick and unequivocal rejoinder was that any aid should "not make us dependent on perpetual injections of aid from the outside", that "…we cannot change our attitude to life, that the world does not owe us a living" – this is the origin of the phrase – "and that we cannot live by the begging bowl... The best way of meeting the problem is to go about it quietly and intelligently, discussing our problems in a low key and with as little fuss and bother as possible." These were his words in 1967 when the British were pulling out. There was steel in the tone of these replies but Mr Lee revealed later in 1999 that he knew how serious the problem really was. He said, "1968 to 1971… were critical years for our young republic. We knew we either made it or we would fail. We worked hard, we worked smart and, most important, we worked as a team. By the time the British withdrew in Oct 1971, we had avoided massive unemployment..." Mr Lee said, "with as little fuss as possible", but in those critical years it would mean a fundamental overhaul of what Singaporeans had indeed become accustomed to but could not afford. To stop the rot, Mr Lee rooted out corruption and attacked the malaise that afflicted our society and economy. What followed would re-make the work environment, industrial relations, schools, skills upgrading, productivity, defence and security. The very issues we talk about in Parliament today. He rid Singapore of unsavoury, unproductive and unsustainable habits and customs inherited from its past. A slew of legislative reforms followed in this House.”
“In fact, he is the only Member of Parliament that Tanjong Pagar has ever had, since elections had started in Singapore, pre-dating our Independence. I doubt this record will ever be broken in our Parliamentary history. But Mr Lee and his Government did not get re-elected time and time again because they dispensed sweet words. Indeed, Mr Lee would often warn voters against politicians with silver-tongues purveying sweet promises, empty promises. He gained a fearsome reputation as one who eschewed the easier, more popular but ultimately wrong paths, as he recounted in his book, "Lee Kuan Yew: Hard Truths to Keep Singapore Going". Flattery fell flat on him as did lofty but pretentious ideals. For Mr Lee, the acid test was whether the idea or proposal would make Singapore stronger. If it weakened this country's foundations, he would reject it, even if it was politically incorrect to say so and attracted widespread criticism. If it would make Singapore better, then no obstacles, no preconceived notions, no preset habits were too deeply entrenched to uproot or overcome. Indeed, he would attack these hindrances squarely and vigorously, to improve our circumstances. That was the Lee Kuan Yew the world knew and respected throughout his political life. In 1968, a Member of Parliament asked this Parliament, how the British withdrawal would impact Singapore. Mr Lee told Singaporeans matter-of-factly that the British bases made up 20% of the GNP and tens of thousands of jobs would be lost. He spoke plainly, there was more to come. He told Singaporeans that they would have "to adapt and adjust, without Page: 12 any whimpering or wringing of hands, as a way of life which they have been accustomed to for over 30 years comes to an end." A truly hard truth.”
“With his powers of persuasion, Mr Lee's clarity and Page: 11 confidence became ours, the people's – the mark of a great leader. Mr Lee is no longer with us, but I believe as many do here, that each generation will discover anew his wisdom in building the sturdy foundations of a thriving Singapore. His life is like a treasure chest. Each visit through his many deeds and words – and you see it now in the community tribute sites, the videos that play, the people who sit there were riveted by what he said, how he said it, his convictions, the courage of his convictions, his clarity of what he believed in, what he saw as problems, and as you replay it – it will reveal pearls of wisdom and nuggets of sound advice, as I found for this eulogy. For such a monumental life, any eulogy will fall short and I seek your pardon. But to honour his memory and remind us what his life stood for, I propose to capture the essence of Mr Lee through his speeches – the very words he used in this Parliament. Even at the dawn of his political career, Mr Lee identified closely with the hopes and aspirations of common Singaporeans. Mdm Speaker, you mentioned his first election in 1955. There he told the voters of Tanjong Pagar, that out of 25 divisions, he wanted to represent "workers, wage earners and small traders, not wealthy merchants or landlords." This was why he "chose Tanjong Pagar, not Tanglin". The residents of Tanjong Pagar believed and trusted him and elected him by a handsome margin. Astonishingly, as Mdm Speaker had said, Mr Lee would be returned as their Member of Parliament for 13 subsequent general elections. He would serve as Member of Parliament for Tanjong Pagar for 60 years – from 1955 to 2015.”
“Mdm Speaker, today this House mourns the passing of Mr Lee Kuan Yew, the founding Prime Minister of Singapore. As you have said, Mdm Speaker, Mr Lee was our longest serving and most illustrious Member. When Mr Lee was admitted to SGH a few weeks ago for pneumonia, Singaporeans from all walks of life watched anxiously, increasingly worried as his condition worsened. There were well wishes – little cards placed all over SGH – so much so that SGH had to create a special site in their courtyard. We saw elderly Singaporeans with arthritic joints kneeling, prostrating themselves for his recovery. Despite the outpouring of deep wishes and fervent prayers, it was not to be. Mr Lee's chair sits empty today. His loss is deeply felt. A nation cries out in mourning. No one moved Singapore as Mr Lee Kuan Yew did – not in life, not in sickness and not in death. We in this House, together with all Singaporeans here and abroad, weep that Mr Lee is no longer among us. Why this deep sorrow for one man? Why do tears flow uncontrollably for thousands on his passing and memory? Simply put, Singapore would not be what it is today without Mr Lee Kuan Yew. He was that bright night star that guided us, an impoverished and fearful nation through Independence. He envisioned, then drove Singapore to become a success story – as he promised, from "mudflats to a thriving metropolis" that countries all over seek to emulate. Today, Singaporeans hold their passports with confidence and pride. Mr Lee's vision and tenacity rallied and energised a nation to overcome seemingly insurmountable odds. He coaxed, pushed Singaporeans to do what was difficult, but ultimately right and good for their long-term interests.”
“Mdm Speaker, I beg to move, "That item 7 of today's order of proceedings be taken after item 4." Question put, and agreed to. Resolved, "That the proceedings on item 7 on the Order Paper for today be taken after item 4." – [Dr Ng Eng Hen]. Page: 55”
“] With speeches made and the Budget approved, what remains is for us in Government and all Members in this House, to serve our people faithfully and conscientiously, with honesty and trustworthiness, to ensure that all these good plans come to fruition for their benefit. 1.38 pm Page: 51”
“Instead, this year, there were more cuts and speeches focused on SkillsFuture, stimulating productivity and innovation, equipping more Singaporeans to be the core to drive our economic engines. In our Golden Jubilee year, many Members also focused on Singapore's "soul" – what makes us unique and the need to retain these cultural and historical traits, including our hawker food. There were many calls to cultivate ourselves to be a more civil society or, at the very least, to be more green and clean, like Taiwan and Japan. Hon Members also asked that more be done to assist single mothers, disadvantaged children and our brothers and sisters with disabilities. All these calls represented earnest aspirations for a better Singapore, and much work remains to be done. This Budget was also the debut for our Nominated Members of Parliament, sworn in less than six months ago. I believe that they got into the swing of things quite well and some made passionate and stirring speeches. Members in this House would agree with me that the new Nominated Members have added substance and style to our deliberations. So, after nine days, we have come to the end of the FY 2015/2016 Budget debates. We have had good productive debates and scrutinised the Government's spending to satisfy ourselves and Singaporeans that we represent, that the direction Singapore is taking is the right one. The high standards and good functioning of the proceedings were made possible by the staff of the Secretariat in Parliament and the able but firm hand of our Speaker. Mdm Speaker, we are, indeed, grateful for your patience in sitting through all our speeches and debates, and for guiding the proceedings onto their satisfying conclusion. We express our deep and special thanks to you and your Deputies. [Applause.”
“If previously, Singapore were a fleet of fast moving cars and trucks gunning for fast growth on the quicker right lanes, we have now added a sizeable fleet of coach buses that will keep to the slower left lanes, to bring along our elderly, the disadvantaged and less able so that we can maintain our precious social compact and bring opportunities and benefits to all. The entire fleet must arrive at our destination. Members' speeches during the Budget debate and Committee of Supply supported this shift, whether they were from the Government Party, the Opposition Members or Nominated Members. But some hon Members also advised caution on fiscal sustainability and were right to do so. They showed good judgement and honesty because it would have been so much easier and populist not to sound these warnings but instead give false assurances that all will be well. The simple truth is that uncertainty does exist, even if our projections assure us for the short and medium term. Beyond that, no one can see that far ahead. The only certainty we have is that there will be unexpected events. And whether these commitments on future spending are sustainable will depend on the ability of Page: 50 Singaporeans to work together in the years ahead to ensure that Singapore continues to thrive in our region and globally. Not surprisingly, with the PG package and Silver Support introduced, wages up and more affordable housing, fewer Members this year asked if the Government was doing enough for the poor, for older Singaporeans and lower-skilled workers. With the introduction of MediShield Life, cuts for MOH fell quite noticeably, too, displacing it from the "top three". So, too, the concerns on the influx of foreign labour, as tightening measures have worked.”
“Mdm Speaker, we have completed Budget 2015/2016. Allow me to make some round-up remarks. Since this term of Government began in 2011 and after four consecutive Budgets, the strategic directions as set out by Prime Minister Lee in his National Day Rally (NDR) speeches and during the debate on the President's Address following the prorogation of Parliament last year, have been followed through in the plans of various Ministries working in concert to flesh out these directions. With this Budget passed, we are another step closer to achieving the vision of a "fair and inclusive society". Surely and steadily, deep structural changes have been enacted to better prepare Singapore for significant challenges ahead. The silver tsunami as our population ages and the need to maintain a strong social compact in a rapidly evolving world stand as the most important challenges for Singapore's next frontier. As promised, the new initiatives and programmes by the Government over the past four years have significantly strengthened social safety nets and redistributed more wealth to the lower- and middle-class. But as a result, too, commitments on the Government's recurrent Budget have also been increased, pari passu. As an example – through Workfare and Silver Support – the Government has now put in place a permanent financial support scheme for 20% to 30% of all citizens aged from 20 or so, and for as long as they live. This represents a fundamental shift that has occurred. What has happened?”
“On the whole, these public consultation exercises, Second and Third Readings in this House and Select Committee for some Bills have allowed the Government to obtain views from members of the public and Members in this Parliament and pass legislation in a timely and responsive manner to meet the needs of our society.”
“Since it was never the intention to apply means testing to the PG package, MOF accepted her proposal and will introduce an amendment to the Bill at an opportune time to provide this certainty. Apart from the Government Parliamentary Committees, this is another positive example of how Members of Parliament in this House have contributed to improve legislation. As Mr Pritam Singh had said, there have also been some occasions when the Government judged it necessary and beneficial to propose to this House to refer specific Bills to a Select Committee of Members of Parliament instead of the Committee of the Whole Parliament after the Second Reading. He has mentioned some, but let me give the list of Bills Page: 51 that have done so. The Bills which this House had referred to a Select Committee include the Parliamentary Elections (Amendment) Bill in 1988, the Maintenance of Religious Harmony Bill and the Administration of Muslim Law (Amendment) Bill in 1990 and 1999 respectively, the Women's Charter (Amendment) Bill, the Maintenance of Parents Bill and the Advance Medical Directive Bill in 1995 and 1996, and the Companies (Amendment) Bill, Goods and Services Tax Bill and the Bankruptcy Bill in 1993 and 1995. The reasons vary, depending again on the issues involved. Not quite as Mr Singh had put it, whether it is to increase support or look at the implementation or provisions. The reasons for Bills to be committed to a Select Committee are when the Government judges that a Select Committee will allow a smaller group comprising Members of the House to further examine the details of implementation for complex issues, or seek views from experts and other focus groups on matters related to the Bill.”
“Mdm Chair, the Government welcomes calls from Members of Parliament to increase engagement and, in the Member's words, to deepen or increase the engagement when it comes to legislation in this House. Indeed, that is what we have been doing over the last few years. Government agencies routinely conduct public consultation exercises with the public to facilitate and incorporate inputs from members of the public and relevant stakeholders before new legislation is introduced into this House. This process includes close engagement with Members of Parliament in this House through the Government Parliamentary Committees who provide valuable suggestions to improve proposed legislation. The extent of consultation varies depending on the issues involved. There are many Bills that are introduced in the House. Let me give some examples of Bills in recent times that have undergone extensive public consultation: the Human Organ Transplant (Amendment) Bill in 2009, Personal Data Protection Bill in 2012, Transboundary Haze Pollution Bill, Remote Gambling Bill and Public Entertainments and Meetings (Amendment) Bill in 2014 and, most recently, the Liquor Control (Supply and Consumption) Bill and Industrial Relations (Amendment) Bill in 2015. After the legislation is introduced, Members of Parliament further scrutinise and deliberate on the Bills during the Second and Third Readings in this House. Parliament also resolves itself into a Committee to discuss the Bill. Members will remember that in November last year, Nominated Member of Parliament Ms Chia Yong Yong proposed an amendment to clause 3 of the Pioneer Generation Fund Bill. She wanted to ensure that no means-testing would be applied.”
“We are inviting those that we can find. So, yes, some of them will be involved. But the larger picture is that we plan a good celebration that all Singaporeans can come together. The Member's point is that really, at the end of it, will Singaporeans feel as one, more united, more optimistic about the future, more determined to forge a better future for all of us? That we will need the help of all Singaporeans. The NDP Organising Committee knows that it has a very onerous task and very high standards for it because there are many requests. They will do their best possible. But I would like us all to enjoy the NDP show come 9 August. And, as I said, make sure that after the NDP show, keep our streets clean, be safe, and I believe that if we put our minds to it and if we use that occasion to see how far we have come as a nation, to use that occasion to come together closer, and to use that occasion to look forward to our future, I believe that the NDP would have served its purpose. And I hope that it will serve its purpose.”
“Madam, there are sensitive units within MINDEF that are out of bounds to Chinese, to Indians. Race is not a factor. It is an issue about commitment and, as you can well imagine, that they are even out of bounds to people who are senior, depending what is the sensitivity is. That is how you run militaries. You have to keep your secrets. You know the slogan "Loose lips sink ships". Those who are in security understand it. And that is routine for militaries, for security agencies. It is common; it is applied; and we have to protect and make sure that the information we have is secure, and it is restricted based on security clearance.”
“Snowden is a classic example where your secrets are all out, and you put your people in danger. So, that is routine. We will continue to commit to make sure that every Singaporean in National Service is put into the best use, as we have done in CSNS as we engage them. And with the support of Members of the House, I believe that we can continue to have a strong defence.”
“Indeed. And not only the first NDP contingent, but the first few, if not marching, then as spectators. The NDP Organising Committee thought that it would be useful to reprise or to bring back the old NDP marching contingents. So, there will be a vintage parade, which means nurses in their old costumes, policemen in their shorts. They would not be the people who marched in the first NDP; they will be younger ones but wearing the same costumes as the vintage parade. But I agree absolutely with the Member that it is not just a show, and I agree with her. If that is all it is, then we have failed. We have to have a touch point, as the member has rightly pointed out, to explain or to impress on people, to celebrate together, to review what we have accomplished together as a nation and to look forward. Another point that I want to respond to is the one by the Member Mr Faisal Manap. Let me thank him for his support for our policy on Malays in the SAF. As I have said and other Defence Ministers before me have said, the SAF's deployment of our National Service soldiers is based on their aptitude, abilities and commitment to Singapore. If you are Page: 134 committed to Singapore and have the abilities, we will put you in the best possible position. He asked some of the comments I have made in a session with Yale-NUS and Law. The context has to be correct. One question was asked, "Can you deploy them? How do you deploy them when it came to sensitive positions?" I made the point about security clearance, and that is routine for these positions. I think Members would find the SAF remiss if, for sensitive positions, we did not do our security clearance. You know what happened in other countries.”
“Madam, I thank the Nominated Member for the remarks. She is right. The SAF is a microcosm of society. You cannot expect everyone to hold the same view, same commitment. And I will tell you, as the betting average goes, we are fighting against the Page: 133 trend. We have a chart about the number of countries that have conscription over the last few years. It is coming down. In Asia, it is really Korea and us, because national service to protect your country is a difficult enterprise. And I would say to that, more an answer that is rose-tinted or even unrealistic, that you have to continue. We have tried in various ways – which the Second Minister and Minister of State have said – whether it is Commitment to Defence Ambassadors, or whether it is through our SAF50 exhibitions or our NDP which we talked about, it is a continuing process. But I believe that on the whole, Singaporeans will defend Singapore when it comes to the crunch. I believe we have built enough goodwill and belief. I acknowledge what Ms Chia said, that there are those who feel that they do not feel that they have the heart or great commitment to defend Singapore; they exist. We will continue to work. But whether or not they do, each one recognises that you have to do National Service, and during the time that we have, we will continue to plod on and to continue to help them to understand why we have to defend our country. Madam, with your permission, I also want to respond to some queries, since we have a few minutes in clarification. One was what Member Irene Ng asked about in terms of whether those who marched in the first NDP will also be marching in our 50th Golden Jubilee. They will be slightly older now, but those that are around will, as she says in her words "some of them will come back".”
“It will be a sad testimony to us as a people if you cannot even clean up after yourself. Organisers will provide more rubbish points, but I am flagging this out now, safety and cleanliness, so that it can enter our collective consciousness and aspirations for National Day. Mdm Chair, with the strong commitment of NSmen and their families, employers and the community, the SAF will continue to safeguard Singapore's Independence and sovereignty on this SAF50 and our Golden Jubilee. We will do it so that our future generations may also enjoy the peace and security that we enjoy today. Page: 116 NSmen Operational Readiness and Safety”
“This includes the cost of logistics equipment for the rehearsals over a span of six to eight months: the four National Education (NE) shows, the preview shows and the actual show itself, which, in previous years, had about 5,500 participants and 25,000 onsite. The scale, of course, in NDP 2015 is much larger; many more folds than in previous years. There will be 7,000 participants, twice as many ticketed spectators; there will be the large crowds around the Bay and thousands of Singaporeans are expected to join in not only at Marina Bay but TV viewers – an estimated two million TV viewers at home. The cost of the NDP 2015 at the Padang alone is about the same as in previous years. But because of these additional sites, new facilities, it will increase the total cost of the NDP in our Golden Jubilee Year to about twice that of previous NDPs. So, it is about twice. In addition, the 1.2 million fun packs will cost an additional $10 million, part of which will be supported by corporate sponsors. We are planning an NDP that allows all Singaporeans to celebrate together. But let me touch on two important points before the facilities overwhelm us. First and foremost is safety. With large crowds expected, I would like everyone at the NDP to pay attention to their personal safety and that of others around them. We are working with the Ministry of Home Affairs, but we need members of the public to take personal responsibility, too. If everyone follows instructions, the risk of mishaps will be reduced. Second, civility and cleanliness. Even as we celebrate NDP this year, even as we do it as one people to reflect on how much we have achieved together, we certainly do not want to diminish this by finding on the next day the whole of Marina Bay area littered.”
“First of all, every Singaporean household, yes, I mean every Singaporean household, 1.2 million Singaporean households, whether in the HDB or private estate, will receive an NDP Funpack. So, even if they cannot come to the Padang or the areas around the Bay, which I will explain, they can watch at home, wave the same banner, slap the same clappers all over the island. Second, we will open up discrete areas around the entire Marina Bay, so that more people can congregate and enjoy NDP15 in person. You look at the slide, you start at the Padang – its capacity is about 26,000. But we are opening up the floating platform where we had last year's NDP. That can hold 25,000. One Fullerton can hold about 10,000; the Promontory, 20,000; the MBS Event Plaza, 30,000; Gardens by the Bay, 40,000. All in, we think the entire area can accommodate more than 150,000. And in some of these sites, we will place giant LED screens so that viewers can watch the show and all of them will be able to watch the aerial displays live and the fireworks. The fireworks for NDP 2015 will be largest ever, as well as the aerial display will the largest ever. I would not be a spoiler, but it will be spectacular. There will be many sights to behold and for Singaporeans to remember. And where possible, the march-past, the contingents as well as the mobile column, will make their way to some of these locations around the Bay area. Page: 115 5.45 pm The cost of the NDP at one site in previous years, which Members have asked about in this House, has been about $20 million.”
“But I am happy to announce that the NDP Organising Committee has changed the format somewhat so that as many people as possible can share in this moment on 9 August 2015. We want to make this Golden Jubilee Celebration special for as many Singaporeans as possible. What do I mean? With your permission, Mdm Chair, may I show you what I mean?”
“Because that is where our first NDP in 1966 took place. Read Mr Lee's account of that particular parade in his memoirs, stirring account, of challenges, what happened. We were thinking, as you know, every year, we have an NDP theme. What would be an appropriate theme for our Golden Jubilee? We have thought hard, the Organising Committee, and when I read to you the theme, you would say it is a good choice. The theme is "Majulah Singapura" – Onward Singapore. It reprises the clarion call to all Singaporeans, a call made to all Singaporeans when we were a poor nation at Independence, beset on all sides – whether they were problems of inadequate jobs, housing, education, basic necessities of life. Listen to our debates in Parliament now. As they say, they are good problems. Just imagine Parliament then at our Independence – problems aplenty, resources very little, if any. And that was the context in which Majulah Singapura was a rallying cry to all of us to move forward as one people to overcome our challenges and more, and we have succeeded. Page: 114 So, NDP will tell this story, as far as possible, to remind us from whence we came, to recognise the contributions of our Pioneer Generation and our leaders in nation-building. There have been many calls – you can imagine the NDP Organising Committee gets many requests, suggestions and calls. One of them I feel particularly – it is important for us to try to accede to, to agree to – that is, to allow as many Singaporeans as possible to share in this historic 50th NDP, because the next Golden Jubilee will be 2065. So, this one, we really want to allow as many people as possible to share in that experience. But you know the Padang, there is a limited number of people who can watch the show.”
“The combined patrols in the Straits of Malacca – a few years ago, the Straits of Malacca was put in the Lloyd's List's risk category equivalent to war-risk zones. Insurance premiums had gone up. You had to pay as if you had ships going through the same risk as in the war-risk zones. At that time, Prime Minister Najib was the Defence Minister and he mooted this idea in the Shangri-La Dialogue of combined maritime-air patrols, eyes in the skies, and, subsequently, joint Malacca Straits patrols in your own sovereign waters. It brought piracy down and Lloyd's delisted the area. We will do more and play a constructive role in regional security as Members have asked us to. That is why we have set up the Information Fusion Centre and the Changi Regional HADR Coordination Centre – this is something that Mr Sitoh Yih Pin asked. He asked if we could accelerate our defence diplomacy. I am happy to update that China, France, Thailand and Brunei have accredited liaison officers to this regional HADR Coordination Centre, while Australia and Laos have established operational linkages. Madam, let me, finally, provide details on this year's National Day Parade (NDP). It is special but the NDP will also be very special. I know there will be questions asked later. Let me give Members some heads-up. It is a very significant year; in fact, our Golden Jubilee year. Looking back 50 years, Singapore has been blessed and we have much to celebrate together. NDP 2015 will remember our historical roots; we will remember from whence we came. That is why we are doing it at the Padang. We will recount our collective achievements as a nation and look forward to a shared progressive future for all Singaporeans. So, appropriately, the NDP will take place at the Padang. Why?”
“We may not be able to issue headline news every time we meet, but that would be unrealistic. Defence diplomacy is slow; sometimes, it is laborious, just like most diplomacy. We should not mistake it to think that because we are just meeting and there are no "announceable" outcomes, that you are not being productive. Patience, slow cultivation provide us more space; it actually wins friends and builds that understanding. It is important to reduce tensions in the South China Sea because it is in our backyard. In May next year, we expect ships, aircraft and personnel from ASEAN and our "plus" partners to participate in another major exercise on maritime security and counter-terrorism. We have something which is extra; we can get the militaries to exercise together. That is what we are trying to push. This practical cooperation is timely and relevant, especially in the face of increased terror threats from ISIS. Mr Pritam Singh asked if ASEAN can issue something in common – and he is right. It is very useful. This is what the Chairman, Malaysia, wants to do. Members would have read the newspapers and would know that Malaysians are in Iraq and Syria. Indonesia's Chief of Defence came to Singapore and he said that he was worried what the fighters would do when they come back to their homeland. It is a real and present threat. It is a core mission for our security forces. Page: 113 This is what we do at the Shangri-La Dialogue as well. Last year, we had 26 ministerial-level delegates and participants from 35 countries. We do not expect to have "announceables" and deliverables every year. But when they happen, it can be quite impactful.”
“Our defence relations with both countries are strong and we frequently interact military to military. Page: 112 Indonesian Defence Minister Ryamizard chose Singapore as his first stop among ASEAN for his introductory visit in January. Recently, as Dr Lim Wee Kiak pointed out, I hosted Defence Minister for Malaysia Hishammuddin and we signed a Letter of Intent together. And we will do more with Indonesia and Malaysia – they are our closest neighbours. We will step up our coordinated naval patrols with Indonesia, Malaysia and other littoral states because there is piracy and sea robbery in our regional waters. As Mr Low Thia Khiang said, the ADMM and the Shangri-La Dialogue are important platforms. They allow us space beyond which small countries find hard to give voice, to put things on the table, to ask questions that concern our collective security; and also, importantly, to encourage militaries from all these countries to build understanding. Without understanding, there can be miscalculations and misunderstandings. I will tell Members that the militaries of Northeast Asian countries rarely speak to one another. They do not meet. That is not healthy; and can be actually very dangerous. And it is very dangerous. When Brunei hosted ADMM, we encouraged Brunei to hold 18-nation exercises, and we helped, supported and facilitated. Just imagine 4,000 troops from 18 countries, the Chinese sent their Peace Ark, the Indian sent their ships, Japan sent their ships; and they were deployed across -decks. Soldiers from different countries, including the US, went to one another's decks of ships, and exchanges built. At the very least, it built some understanding, even more than that, for some, it built trust. It reduces the risk of miscalculation. It may not be headline-grabbing.”
“We allow them to use PLAB and Changi Naval Base for transit. The second US Navy Littoral Combat Ship arrived in Singapore recently, rotating through its deployment. In addition, our close relationship with the US affords us access to high-end defence systems, as well as the training space in the US. I talked about the high mobility artillery systems. Some Members who were previous artillery chaps would know how many men it needed to set up the artillery. It was a slog and you have to respond. About 12 men, they tell me. But now, the new systems, from the US, operate with three men in front of the truck – 70 kilometres, high precision, shoot and scoot. Our defence relations with China are excellent and we acknowledge China's desire to play a peaceful and constructive role in this region. Reflecting this close relationship, Chinese Defence Minister Chang Wanquan and I jointly issued a press release during my visit there in November last year to enhance our defence interactions and to commemorate the 25th anniversary of Singapore-China diplomatic ties this year. We had joint exercises. It was quite a sight to see People's Liberation Army (PLA) troops on one side and SAF troops on the other charging up the hill, taking an objective together. The Chinese do some things quite in style. They have large operating training grounds where you can sit and see the mass. We do not have that; we do not have the space. It was a very good interaction. We actively engage our closest neighbours, Malaysia and Indonesia. We share many common interests to build understanding and mutual respect. The SAF was among the first to assist our neighbours in the search for MH370 and QZ8501, as well as provide assistance during the floods in Malaysia a few months ago.”