Zhulkarnain Abdul Rahim
Singapore
“As a society, we need to ensure that no family is trapped by their circumstances, no child is defined by their starting point, no potential goes unrealised and no hope beyond reach. This is not just a social policy; it is a moral responsibility.”
“Will the Ministry set up clear timelines, audit and review mechanisms and public reporting expectations for these enhancements, so that agencies are held to consistent standards across, and families can have this confidence and trust, especially in suspected child abuse cases, so that they are not missed or delayed in reporting?”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. And I thank the Minister. I had a supplementary question on humanitarian aid assistance and I am heartened to hear that Singapore will continue to work with the international bodies, and at the same time maintain the safety of our humanitarian workers there.”
“Thank you, Sir. I thank the Minister for the Statement. I do agree that identity politics would be disastrous for Singapore, especially minorities. And I thank him for the Statement.”
“Sir, I thank Minister Josephine Teo, Minister of State Faishal Ibrahim and Minister of State Sun Xueling for laying out the clear and comprehensive plans and priorities for MHA.”
“Sir, I thank Minister Edwin Tong and Minister of State Murali Pillai for their clear clarifications and plans for MinLaw and for our fellow Singaporeans. Sir, the law is the tool, but justice is the ideal. I thank the staff and officers of MinLaw for making access to justice the ideal for our Singaporeans.”
The complete record
Every one of 418 lines we hold for Zhulkarnain Abdul Rahim, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 4 of 9.
“We perhaps need our clinics or centres equipped as a safe zone reporting shelter for victims to get medical, psychological and legal counselling, and FME with evidence to be secured and retained for investigation. Fifthly, may ask if our offices of medical practitioners are provided immunity from personal liability in the conduct of FME on the victim? In this regard, would medical advice on the exact FME procedure and any related risk be explained to the person so that he or she will be able to make an informed decision? Lastly, on safeguards in FMEs. Dr Jack Lee, in his article in the Singapore Law Review, provided various recommendations on such safeguards by considering the degree of encroachment into the suspects bodily integrity, dignity and privacy. This is classified into: one, non-intimate and non-intrusive procedures; two, intimate non-intrusive procedures; three, intimate intrusive procedures; four, prohibited procedures; and fifth, general safeguards. Do the Police or relevant related agencies have an internal guideline for such safeguards in FMEs? If so, would non-intimate procedures or non-intrusive procedures be prioritised or preferred in the first instance? I now move on to criminal case disclosure. I welcome the amendments to codify the Common Law obligations into legislation. These amendments address a fundamental concern of ensuring that relevant and material evidence in the prosecutions' possession, which either incriminates or exculpates the accused, is made available to the defence at the pre-trial stage and is subsequently adduced at trial so that the Court is apprised of the full facts and all available evidence.”
“Thirdly, on facilities to aid conduct of FMEs, in a Parliamentary Question in 2017, MHA stated that the Police issued sexual assault examination kits to hospitals with 24/7 obstetrics and gynaecology (O&G) specialist clinics. There was also a collaboration on the One Safe Centre for reporting within 72 hours of assault. I would like to ask whether there will be more clinics that can be equipped for FME? For instance, can selected general practitioners (GPs) conduct FMEs? Family doctors who have treated and established a long-standing relationship with the victims' family may know the full history of the victim or the family members and thus the victim may be more comfortable with that particular doctor. This FME by the doctor, of course, can be conducted in the presence of the Police or their own FME experts. Fourthly, what are the efforts to encourage more victims to come forward to report so that they receive professional help and, at the same time, secure the evidence through FME? Time is of the essence. The European Union (EU), in adopting the Istanbul Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, stated that according to research, it is good practise to carry out FMEs regardless of whether the matter will be reported to the Police and to offer the possibility of having samples taken and stored appropriately so that the decision as to whether or not to report the assault can be taken later by the victim. Due to the stigma and criminal proceedings that will ensue, some victims may not come forward in time or come forward at all.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir. I rise in support of the Bill. I will cover three main areas in my speech: first, the amendments relating to the FME; second, on the criminal disclosure obligations; and third, on the SEPP regime. On the FME, I welcome these amendments that will help preserve evidence crucial to solving serious sexual and violent crimes. I was volunteering as the board member of a crisis shelter for survivors of domestic violence, some of whom are victims of violent crimes as well. These amendments are important to assist the Police and our investigating bodies in administering FME. However, I have a few clarifications. Firstly, of particular interest to me is the issue of obtaining consent. This is especially where there are grounds to believe that a delay in carrying out the FME may result in the loss, degradation, or contamination of the evidence. Can the Minister clarify what are the circumstances when the Police will determine that a victim is unable to provide consent within a reasonable time? Would this be done in consultation with advice from medical professionals, for instance, as to the probability of the victim waking up from coma or would the default position be to obtain consent from the victim's next of kin or authorised decision-maker? Secondly, on training. Would Police officers or persons conducting the FME go through any sensitivity or trauma training to handle the situation with tact, taking into consideration any cultural or religious sensitivities, especially when interacting with decision makers, parents or spouses of victims?”
“We cannot be pulled into a partisan fight pitting one against the other. Let us have the conviction of courage to do the right thing and show empathy for all affected. Let us not allow conflicts overseas to sow discords of disharmony amongst us. Let us remain united with fellow Singaporeans to stand side by the side – on the side of humanity and compassion. The one thing that this tragedy proves to us is this – the Palestinians people's aspirations, pain and suffering cannot be ignored if we want longstanding peace and stability for both Israelis and Palestinians to live side by side and prosper together. Longstanding peace cannot be achieved through a cycle of violence. It is broken through the intervention of love, humanity and compassion. Quoting from Martin Luther King, "Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that." Mr Speaker, Sir, I support this Motion and beg to move. [Applause.]”
“This is not only a way to practice our faith, but it also demonstrates to everyone that our religion teaches us to give emphasis to compassion, peace and humanity. I hope we can do more to also make the call to our foreign Muslim workers who are working here, so that they also understand our ways and become part of this effort in Singapore Globally, I hope the Government will also support a humanitarian ceasefire as voted by the UN, so that basic aid can be allowed to continue. I also support the Commission of Inquiry that is set up by the UN to gather and preserve evidence of war crimes, and investigate allegations of international law violations. I hope Singapore will support the proposal to bring anyone who is guilty and who violates international law, so that they will face justice and a day of reckoning in future. (In English): Mr Speaker, Sir, I spoke in Malay about the efforts of the community to support the humanitarian cause in Gaza, together with our nation. Our Mufti exemplified leadership in extending not only compassion and our condolences for those who have lost lives and loved ones but also our collective condemnation against violence. During this period, our religious leaders have also guided our asatizah and community in handling the deluge of information and emotional impact on all of us through the khutbah sermons during Friday prayers and religious guidance. Mufti's leadership showcases to the world that Islam emphasises peace and compassion for all. However, there is a view questioning the need for such religious guidance. In this regard what is the Government's position on such views, especially in conflicts which are complex and go beyond the religious realm? Mr Speaker, Sir, we must guard against rhetoric which cause divisions in our society.”
“] Palestinian civilians in Gaza are now facing a health crisis sparked by the destruction of public infrastructure, such as hospitals, ambulances and medical supplies that were blocked. The UN on 2 November stated that "Gaza is running out of time" and it is a critical time for Palestinians right now. Innocent children have become victims of the relentless violence of war. Those caught in the middle of the conflict are Palestinians from different religions and backgrounds. Palestinian civilians who have done no wrong are yearning for peace and prosperity for their families and children. But now, they are facing a bleak future. We need compassion and protection of the Palestinian civilians' rights. I would like to call on everyone, that this crisis in Gaza requires a humanitarian effort that needs mass support. Over the years, I have raised this issue in Parliament about humanitarian efforts and Singapore's support towards the peace process in the Middle East. I was thankful when a humanitarian channel was recently opened for supplies to enter Gaza even if it was for a brief period. I am also touched by the encouraging amount of donation for humanitarian aid in Gaza, not only from our Malay/Muslim community, but from all Singaporeans. This demonstrates our collective effort regardless of race, religion or age. Spiritually, our Malay/Muslim community has also prayed for peace in our mosques through special prayer sessions and reciting the supplication Qunut Nazilah during prayer. For instance, Pergas organized the first special prayer session at the Kassim Mosque. I also attended the special prayers at Al-Firdaus mosque with our foreign workers and at the Al-Khair mosque with Chua Chu Kang residents. Many of our old and young congregants were also there.”
“In this age of technological advancement and social media, evidence can be found, witnesses can corroborate and false information can be sifted out so that any breaches of international law would one day come to light and the perpetrators would be brought to the International Courts of Justice for their day of reckoning. Against this backdrop, we must continue to have faith and continue to abide by our principles and the rule of law. In this regard, the UN has already constituted an Independent International Commission of Inquiry which has been collecting and preserving evidence of war crimes since 7 October 2023. I would like to ask, firstly, after this conflict has de-escalated, whether the Singapore Government would support a call for parties to render full cooperation and facilitate the investigative work of the Commission of Inquiry and seek that the Commission discloses its reports or outcomes as soon as possible. Secondly, given that most of our humanitarian aid donated to Gaza will go through Egypt, whether the Singapore Government will ask our Egypt counterparts to assist and facilitate the movement of aid and assistance through the opening of the Rafah crossing bordering Gaza, which has seen tight restrictions since 2014. Thirdly, besides the current assistance pledged by the Singapore Government, I hope that Singapore can also perhaps consider providing critical vaccinations and other medication for the Palestinian population who are facing a health crisis. Mr Speaker, Sir, putting aside what needs to be done by the world collectively which goes beyond our powers, we are not entirely without hope and we are not completely helpless because of what we can do here in Singapore. Mr Speaker, in Malay please. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.”
“The law balances a nation's right to use deterrence as self-defence while mitigating the excessive brutalities and destruction that war would bring. Assistant Professor Yuan Yi Zhu, of International Relations and International Law at Leiden University, the Netherlands, and a Research Fellow at Harris Manchester College, Oxford, recently stated: "International humanitarian law has broad acceptance because it seeks to mitigate the worst effects of armed conflict instead of banning it entirely. If it's construed in a way that allows no practical military operations to take place, belligerents might just ignore it outright." International law, namely the Geneva Convention, is intended to protect innocent civilians during armed conflict and prohibits the targeting of civilians and essential objects indispensable to the survival of civilian population. There are four basic principles: first, distinction between non-combatants and others; second, military necessity; third, unnecessary suffering; and fourth, proportionality. On necessity and proportionality, there is a grey line when collateral damages cross into collective punishment. International humanitarian law ensures that collective punishment for a crime committed by an individual is forbidden. For the current conflict, in the face of what has been reported or what appears to be breaches of humanitarian law, I am deeply distressed and concerned because I am only human. But I remain calm because I believe in justice and the due process of the law. After the dust settles, a fuller investigation of the evidence and such breaches of international law can and must be made.”
“The world needs to do more globally to stop this cycle of violence and protect the children, whether they are Arabs or Jews, Israelis or Palestinians. Mr Speaker, Sir, I have raised issues impacting civilians in Israel and the Palestinian Territories previously in this House. In 2021, following the violence in Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa Mosque during Ramadan, I posed a question in Parliament. Minister Balakrishnan, in his responses, made it clear that Singapore's primary concern has always been the safety and security of civilians on all sides and that international law and agreements must be upheld. Last year, I asked about Singapore's efforts to support the Palestinian Authority. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) updated that since 2013, more than 700 Palestinian Authority officials and students have benefited through the Enhanced Technical Assistance Programme (ETAP) training courses and study visits to Singapore. This year during the Committee of Supply (COS) debates, I asked again on Singapore's role to alleviate the Palestinian-Israeli tensions, whether on our own or together with the Gulf countries. Where there were breaches of international law through illegal settlements and unilateral declarations of Jerusalem as capital city, Singapore has shown the courage of conviction to call it out through voting at the UN General Assembly resolutions ever since 1967. Singapore's position has always been constant and principled. As a small country, we must always mean what we say and say what we mean. We can only take the side of principles and the law. Mr Speaker, Sir, war or conflict in the history of mankind is inevitable. But over the years, there are rules of engagement and international humanitarian law to ensure non-combatant casualties are kept to a minimal.”
“The helpless children and newborn in the ICUs of such hospitals in Gaza would stand no chance. This is compounded by the shutdown of Internet and communications essential to emergency services. As such, I support the Singapore Government's actions on 28 October to vote in favour of the UN General Assembly Resolution calling for, among other things, a humanitarian truce and aid access to the besieged Gaza Strip. Singapore could have just remained apathetic like the 45 other countries in the world who abstained in vote, but we stood up and put forward our position, voting on principles of humanity and international law. I thus support the amendments to this Motion proposed by Member Mr Alex Yam and co-sponsor of this Motion, which highlight this recent UN resolution. Mr Speaker, Sir, this is not an overnight issue that has just been brought to light. This is an issue, although complex and emotive, is very important to the peace and stability of not only the Middle East but the rest of the world. This is not a religious or theological issue either; neither can we paint everyone with the same brush – not all Israelis voted for their government, not all Palestinians in Gaza are supporters of Hamas. This is also not an issue on Gaza alone but the rest of Palestine. For instance, in West Bank, where Hamas has no control, according to the humanitarian charity Save the Children, before 7 October, at least 38 Palestinian children have been killed this year, making it the deadliest year since records began. This equates to more than one Palestinian child killed per week. Further, at least six Israeli children were killed in the same period, three times more than last year. This is a long-standing issue with deep historical roots.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir. I rise in support of this Motion moved by my hon friend, Mr Vikram Nair. Like him and many others in this Chamber and across the world, I share the concerns about the plight of innocent civilians impacted. We must reject and condemn violence against the innocent and any civilian. There is no justification for what has happened on 7 October, amongst those killed are citizens from other countries including those from our close neighbours in ASEAN: 18 Thai nationals killed with another 11 taken hostage, seven Filipinos missing and one Cambodian student killed. What happened after that – the chaos and destruction in Gaza – is even more distressing. In Gaza, out of the almost 9,000 people reportedly dead, more than 3,600 were children killed in the first 25 days. That is a staggering 40% of the entire fatalities. We are not even talking about children who have become orphans overnight, found themselves without a roof over their heads, or those who will have to live the rest of their lives permanently disabled. There are also about 30 Israeli children who have been taken hostage. These children must be returned to their parents and families. It is now over a month and their safety is not just unknown but also uncertain, given the bombardment of Gaza. Sir, allow me to speak as a parent. Earlier last year, I welcomed the birth of my newborn son in difficult and emergency circumstances. I saw firsthand in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (ICU), babies who are clinging on to their lives, fighting to survive every single day. What I saw and read of the reports in Gaza, was the bombing of hospitals and health facilities, the cutting of electricity, medical aid and other necessities.”
“Thank you, Sir. I thank the Second Minister for Home Affairs for answering my PQ. Sir, I have just one supplementary question. Although we need strict controls for our anti-money laundering regime, I think we need to balance that with the cost of due diligence and overburdening our businesses for checks and reporting. What are the steps to sensemake and regularly consult the stakeholders, particularly financial institutions, pawnbrokers and our precious stone and metal dealers as well?”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker. My question is for Minister Chan. Thank you for answering the question on Ministerial Code of Conduct. In the UK, the code of conduct is always revised at the start of every new administration, and there is a setting out of the possible sanctions as well. Would the Code of Conduct for Ministers be similarly reviewed more consistently, and perhaps, the sanctions available to be expressly stated for any breaches?”
“Yes. So, for the future findings and future commitments to accountability and building up trust, I hope that there can be periodical reports and disclosures to the public to ensure that the measures and safeguards are being put in place.”
“Thank you, Madam. I think Members have asked various questions, including myself. I just want to remind Members of the critical role that SPH Media has played, particularly recently, in the COVID-19 fight, to dispel untruths and put the right messages out there and receive certificates of commendation as well. The level of trust, I thank the Minister for the assurance —”
“I hope that the Ministry will continue the good work by working with all stakeholders, from corporates, online platforms to educational institutions and our youths who are digital natives, in raising public awareness and collective vigilance as a nation against online criminal harms. Sir, notwithstanding my clarifications, I stand in support of this Bill.”
“In June 2022, the US Federal Trade Commission issued a report to Congress warning about safeguards when using AI to combat online harms. The report encourages legislators to create policies that ensure AI tools do not cause additional problems. Some recommendations include avoiding over-reliance due to false positives and false negatives, using more human oversight, improving platform AI interventions and passing laws that change the business models or incentives that allow harmful content to proliferate. Singapore can also be a contributor to the global effort to harmonise the rules of AI regulations and, in particular, by using to detect and deter online criminal harms and also the approach in the case of online criminal harms perpetrated by AI itself. In conclusion, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this Bill will put us in good stead to combat online criminal harms and we will have a comprehensive legal framework in this regard with legislations like POFMA, FICA and recent amendments to the Broadcasting Act and the recent enhanced deterrents against money mules in online scams. Sir, there is a quote, "Curiosity pulls people into the scam and the fraudster's greatest liability is the certainty that his fraud is too clever to be detected." We must correct this. Instead of curiosity, we must make our people circumspect when faced with possible scams. Instead of arrogance, we must make scammers afraid of the certainty that they will not be able to get away with it. At the same time, we should continue with our proactive approach to the prevention of online criminal harms.”
“In the premises, will the Ministry consider establishing rules, possibly by way of a subsidiary legislation, to enabling the Reviewing Tribunal or such other appeals committee, in the appropriate circumstances, to either, first, hear cases on an expedited basis; second, stay the Direction or Order pending the final decision of the Reviewing Tribunal; or third, make interim measures/orders where appropriate and necessary? My third and final clarification is in relation to keeping up with the forms of online criminal harms using artificial intelligence (AI) or other technological developments. We are faced with new online platforms, media and technology all the time. Just earlier this week, Meta announced that it will be launching a new social media app called "Threads" on its Instagram platform rivalling Twitter. These new platforms and technologies will only increase in number and sophistication as society progresses. I would humbly suggest a constant monitoring and review of the online criminal harms space in this regard. I hope that the Minister can assure this House that the Bill or its Schedule can be periodically reviewed on a frequent basis to ensure that we keep up-to-date and possibly even abreast with the various new online criminal harms and technological platforms that may arise in the future so as to ensure that the legislation will still remain fit for purpose. In this regard, how will MHA be working with MCI or other agencies to ensure this? In such evolving circumstances, perhaps, the use of AI intervention may be deployed to benefit us, as Member Mr Gerald Giam mentioned earlier. However, I must say that this must be exercised with caution as the use of AI and other technological tools, comes with its pitfalls and necessary risks.”
“The Bill gives the Minister for Home Affairs broad powers to order Internet intermediaries to remove or block online content. These powers are not subject to judicial oversight, save for an appeal to a Reviewing Tribunal in the case of a Part 2 Direction or an appeal to the Minister or an Appeals Advisory Committee in other appeals. Some are concerned about censorship of legitimate content. May I ask the Minister to clarify the appeals process and explain how the process will not be used to restrict free speech or legitimate content? In this regard, firstly, what are the criteria that will be used to determine whether a content is considered to be "online criminal harms"? Secondly, what safeguards will be put in place to protect the privacy of users? My second clarification is in relation to the interim measures pending the conclusion of the appeals stage. For clauses 17 and 36 of the Bill, there is a requirement that the designated officer or competent authority affirm, cancel or substitute the Direction or Order within a "reasonable time" after receipt of an application for re-consideration. As a starting point, I welcome the flexibility given to the relevant authorities to deal with the differing situations that may arise. This is because such decisions should be made expeditiously to address the evolving situation and the decision should be made within a reasonable time. However, until reconsideration or final decision of an appeal, such decisions and orders remain in force.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I stand in support of the Online Criminal Harms Bill. This Bill is a significant piece of legislation that will help Singaporeans from online harms. During my Meet-the-People session this past Monday, I met a couple who had lost their life savings, over $240,000, through elaborate and unauthorised transfers from their bank accounts. They were devastated. That night alone, we had three cases of residents facing online scams. I have met many during my house visits and Meet-the-People sessions, many who had fallen victims to the scams or know of someone who had. With online scams becoming increasingly sophisticated and deploying various methods and technology, I welcome this Bill to combat against online scams and protect our fellow Singapore residents from falling prey. The Bill introduces a number of new measures to combat online crime, including: firstly, issuance of Government Directions to online service providers to take down content or disable accounts that are suspected of being used for criminal activity; secondly, online service providers will be required to comply with codes of practice that set out standards for preventing and responding to online harms; thirdly, enhanced enforcement powers allow the Police to investigate and prosecute online crimes. I believe that the Bill is a necessary step to protect Singaporeans from online harms. However, I have three clarifications. My first clarification is in relation to the appeals process and the oversight of the implementation of the Bill. I echo what hon Member Mr Murali Pillai said, "'Final' does not necessarily mean final". The lawyers would always want to have the final word.”
“Together with Casa Raudha, Keat Hong Community Centre organises annual talks for men to tackle issues of patriarchal mindsets, toxic masculinity and equal parenting responsibilities in our efforts to end family violence. In one session, I had the opportunity to speak to a panelist who was a former perpetrator himself. He shared how he was truly repentant and wanted to reconcile with his wife and family. He paid his dues. He sought professional help. He committed himself to a path of atonement and forgiveness from his family. Now, with every passing day, he tries to become a better husband, a better father, a better man. I hope he continues on this path and be an inspiration to others as well. I welcome the changes to enhance powers for the Court to order counselling and mandatory treatments for perpetrators. I hope that besides working to protect survivors of family violence, we can also continue to consider greater rehabilitation and reconciliation efforts in the future to bring former perpetrators on the path of recovery and rehabilitation, so that one day they can be welcomed back in the lives of those whom they had loved, lost and hurt before. Mdm Deputy Speaker, in conclusion, the amendments in this Bill will strengthen the Government's ability to intervene in family violence cases and empower survivors to better protect themselves. I stand in support of the Bill.”
“These are drastic orders that are capable of disrupting and impacting children's lives. While an emergency order is stated to only have 14 days' validity, under section 62B(8), the protector has the power to issue fresh emergency orders, limited to four emergency orders in three months. Notwithstanding these extensive powers, there does not appear to be any avenue for review or appeal. Can an individual subject to an emergency order apply to Court to cancel or vary the emergency order? Next, if all measures are insufficient to protect the family violence survivor, the protector can also apply to Court to remove the survivors for their safety. There is a concern that this would deter survivors from seeking help if they are not ready to move out. Hence, I humbly suggest that there should be greater public awareness and counselling of families involved to assure them that these measures are of a last resort. This is consistent with the case law in relation to a care and protection order under the Children and Young Persons Act, where such measures are of last resort. I also note that there would be the use of e-tagging in deterring family violence. I welcome this. This is something that I had raised in a Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) on 1 March last year for the use of tagging technology to alert survivors in close range to high risk or violent ex-offending perpetrators. I hope that e-tagging and the use of other technology may act as a deterrence to perpetrators and assurance to survivors of their safety and protection. Lastly, besides punitive measures and deterrence, we must not forget the potential for the rehabilitation of perpetrators.”
“There is also an element of intention on the part of the offender, in that the offender must wilfully or knowingly place the family member in fear of hurt or must have caused hurt by an act which is known to result in hurt. Under the proposed Women's Charter section 58B(2)(a), it is sufficient to constitute family violence if there is a threat to cause personal injury or physical pain, whether or not there is actual hurt or fear of hurt. The element of intention also appears to have been removed as there will be family violence so long as the conduct causes injury or pain. Next, I note that this definition of family violence is principally adapted from the definition of abuse in the Vulnerable Adults Act (VAA). The VAA is meant to protect vulnerable adults, that is, individuals incapable of protecting themselves, whereas family violence provisions may apply to all adults, including those who are capable of protecting themselves. May I know what is the rationale for these changes? Further, would there be any guidance on how the new broadened family violence definition should be interpreted? There should be clarity to this, given that upon belief that there is family violence or risk of family violence, the protector has wide-ranging powers, including the powers to: (a) assess a victim; (b) enter premises; (c) apply to Court for PPO; and, in high-risk situations, (d) make emergency orders against persons they believe to have committed family violence. I turn to the powers of the Domestic Violence Emergency Response Team and the protector. Are there any safeguards against the abuse of such powers? Where a child is involved, it potentially involves removing a parent accused of being a perpetrator from the child's life.”
“Typically, she will bring her son to work. However, one day, the child's paternal grandfather and paternal aunt came to Mdm N's workplace and took the child without her consent. Even after the matter was reported and the Police interviewed her son and her husband's family, the family refused to cooperate to return the son back to Mdm N. At that time, it was assessed that Mdm N's son was not in any immediate danger while in the company of her estranged husband's family and her husband, and that her husband has every right to have care and control of the son at that time. This separation from her five-year-old son caused a lot of anguish for Mdm N and inflicted on her more pain and hurt than any previous injuries that she had suffered at the hands of the perpetrator. With the amendments in this Bill, had a Stay Away or No Contact order been made, such incidents and interventions by other third parties like extended relatives or family members would have been prevented. This would further strengthen the support for family violence survivors and their children. I thus feel that the amendments in this Bill are timely. The changes may not have come in time for Mdm N, but it would be helpful for other mothers who stand in similar shoes in the future. I thus welcome the changes to this Bill to better protect all survivors of family violence. I do have some clarifications. Firstly, I note that the definition of "family violence" has been expanded and broadened. Under the current Women's Charter section 64, subsections (a) and (b), the definition of "family violence" refers to placing a family member in fear of hurt or causing hurt to the family member. "Hurt" in turn means bodily pain, disease or infirmity.”
“This is an important development because every survivor faces unique circumstances that may impact their willingness or ability to pursue legal remedies such as a PPO. Some survivors may feel that applying for a PPO may escalate the violence or place them in greater danger while others may not want to involve the legal system for fear of causing the perpetrator to be jailed, thus further complicating the issues with the perpetrator. I hope a nuanced approach can be taken in exercising this power by the protector to apply for a PPO, especially in cases where survivors are reluctant to do so on their own accord. Legal remedies such as PPOs should be a measure of last resort and only issued when it is assessed that there is high risk that the survivor's safety being compromised. However, it must be remembered that beyond legal redress and intervention, the Ministry and its affiliates, partners and agencies already provide holistic support and resources to meet survivors' needs such as counseling, advocacy and safety planning. I welcome the enhanced support in this regard through this Bill. By providing a range of support services that address the unique needs and circumstances of survivors, we can help empower survivors to take control of their lives and make informed decisions about their safety and well-being. Another change is that the Bill creates a new protection order that can include a number of provisions such as an order to stay away from the survivor and to have no contact with the survivor. I welcome these changes. Allow me to share a story about a family violence survivor in Casa Raudha called Mdm N. She is a foreign bride who suffered spousal abuse and sought refuge with her five-year old son at the shelter through MSF's help.”
“Mdm Deputy Speaker, I stand in support of the amendment Bill. I would like to start by thanking MSF for taking this important step. In particular, I commend the work of MSF and the Taskforce on Family Violence led by Minister of State Sun Xueling and Minister of State Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim for the comprehensive recommendations in the task force's report of 2021. MSF has been in extensive consultations with various stakeholders, including crisis shelter homes like Casa Raudha, which provides interim protection for vulnerable women and children facing family violence. Over the years, we have seen various legislative enhancements and steps to raise awareness on this important issue, one which lies close to my heart. I thank Minister of State Sun for stating in her Second Reading speech just now that MSF may consider, in the future, if it is necessary, for a standalone domestic violence bill to better protect survivors who are not in a familial relationship. This is something that I had raised before in this House. For now, this Bill is yet another step in the right direction. This Bill allows protectors to apply for PPO on the survivors' behalf even if these survivors do not want to do so on their own accord. MSF's Domestic Violence Emergency Response Team can also issue an emergency order without the need to go Court. Currently, a survivor must apply in Court for a PPO and at the time of application, be granted an expedited order. Unfortunately, this presents a time gap between the initial incident of family violence and the issuance of the expedited order or a PPO. With this Bill, a time limited emergency order can be issued where there is an imminent risk and danger that the perpetrator will commit family violence.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, my first supplementary question is to Senior Minister Teo. In Senior Minister's report, he concluded that Mr Shanmugam had declared the potential conflict of interest and removed himself from the chain of command. I would like to ask Senior Minister to comment on the Code of Conduct for Ministers which speaks out for an apparent and a perceived conflict of interest, and a Minister should not be in a position where his financial interest might be even conceivably in conflict with his public duty. So, how should these standards be looked at in the light of Minister Shanmugam's case? The second supplementary question is a short one for Minister Shanmugam on his CPIB interview. I would like to ask the Minister whether he was administered a caution when he attended at CPIB for the interview.”
“Thank you, Sir. I thank the Senior Minister of State and our officers from MSO for their hard work since 2015 on the OneService app. I understand that efficient and effective resolution of the issues much depend on the accurate characterisation and the details to be given. So, I can imagine it will be challenging for officers and agencies to route to the correct channels if such details are not given. My questions are for the OneService app, how can it be further improved and would there be plans to further improve the app to ensure that users provide all the necessary information upfront and the details – perhaps by the use of ChatBots or AI or any other technology. Secondly, I think I heard from Senior Minister of State that there are action plans to manage the expectations of feedback providers that may take longer time. Would interim updates be provided through notifications? And lastly, we should leverage on community resources. Can the local grassroots advisors be alerted where key issues on the ground crop up through the OneService app, so that we can leverage on our local resource partners and other community resources on the ground? For instance, in Keat Hong constituency, we have an estates task force made up of resident volunteers and some community leaders that actually complement the work of the grassroots advisors.”
“Thank you, Madam. Firstly, I thank the Minister for the clarifications. I also wish to thank the members of the PTC led by Mdm Chairperson, our Nominated Member of Parliament, hon Ms Janet Ang. I thank the work that they have done to make sure that the fares remain fair and equitable for all. My supplementary question is: given the connectivity plans for the future lines and the projected increase in ridership, does the Ministry foresee that the current transport subsidy assistance schemes available will be tweaked further? For instance, increasing the PTVs or maybe have a more calibrated approach to the PTVs, as I had suggested in one of my Parliamentary Questions – for instance, for those who do not qualify strictly for the PTVs, maybe a smaller quantum of less than $30 be provided to cushion the impact of any projected increment.”
“I thank the Minister for clarifying about the cases of sharing Singpass credentials for genuine legitimate purposes and also where the elderly seek help to access their Singpass accounts. So, when I do my house visits and my AICs, the volunteers are quite aware in this regard. In conclusion, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we are working and walking in the right direction to stop the scourge of scams in our midst. This does not just affect the elderly but also the young who are looking for jobs and to earn a decent and honest living, and maybe may not have had the full brunt of life experiences before them. Our people's hard-earned money and lifesavings are at risk and at stake and, with that, their hopes and aspirations for a better future. I stand in support of the Bills.”
“Because the advertisements are framed as job advertisements, many young persons or even older ones may not appreciate that. Just by letting another person access their Singpass or bank account, they are committing a serious offence. Or as the Minister mentioned, the disclosing of their Singpass credentials. In addition, such awareness campaigns should be done in concert with the banks and financial institutions, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) and potential employers as well. The risk and dangers of being used as money mules can be amplified through our job seeking portals to alert potential jobseekers of the scams and pitfalls out there. Lastly, I agree with the amendments under the Computer Misuse Act to protect the use of our Singpass credentials. In this regard, may I also suggest that for vulnerable members of our society, like the elderly and adults with special needs, that any changes or unauthorised access to their Singpass accounts also be notified to their next-of-kin, guardian or adult children. I raised in this House previously about one of my Keat Hong residents, who is an adult with special needs, and how he was scammed into signing up for various phone lines by scammers and that his elderly parents were helpless to prevent the scam. We need to have a more robust way of protecting the vulnerable groups of our society. Perhaps, the use of data analytics to see the pattern of access by such groups can also help alert or red flag any sudden unathorised access. What are the steps that the Ministry will take to bolster such protection? Perhaps, before any changes to access to such Singpass accounts can be made, there can be a two-factor authentication to be approved by the next-of-kin, guardian or their adult children.”
“The proposed amendments to the law will place the burden on the accused money mule to prove that he or she had reasonable grounds to believe that the disclosure of his or her Singpass was lawful and to take reasonable steps to ascertain the purpose of the person accessing the account and the source of funds and/or the person's identity in relation to the bank account. I think this is commonsensical. In practice, it is likely that the person will face difficulty to prove otherwise and may be found guilty under the amended provisions. This is despite the fact that he or she may not have had any knowledge as to how the bank account was being used. There are various offences, such as rash or negligent money laundering, where the accused money mule has a suspicion that the monies could be criminal proceeds but chose not to verify the legitimacy of such funds. If I may ask, what would be the reasonable steps that a person can take to make such verifications? Perhaps, the Ministry can consider forming a public reporting office which provides an avenue through the anti-scam hotline or an enhancement on the ScamShield app for members of the public and those who genuinely intend to make such verifications. This way, a person can just make a call, alert the agencies or banks of such offer or make verifications for such transactions before it is being made. This can come under the suspicious transactions reporting office for AML transactions, something which our ordinary members of the public may not be aware of. Next, the burden of proof is about to shift, some say, in a drastic manner. I wonder if the Ministry may wish to consider delaying the implementation of the amendments while carrying out public education events as to the seriousness of such offences.”
“This provision does not seem the most appropriate for the acts committed. Hence, I welcome the changes proposed by the Bill and their direct intervention in this regard. My firm is part of the Criminal Legal Aid Scheme (CLAS) acting for accused persons on a pro bono basis and we see some of these cases. From experience, not all alleged money mules fit the typical stereotype of a criminal scammer. Some of them claim or maybe are as much victims of circumstances as the scammed victims themselves. If I may share a case about one such young accused person that walked through our office doors. Aged 19, he was serving his NS. He saw a job advertisement and responded to it with the intention of working to support his family of seven and supplement the income of the sole breadwinner. He ended up giving up control of his bank account and Singpass to an unknown person in return for payment. He thought this is his income or salary. Easy come, easy go. But it was too good to be true. Call it youthful brashfulness. He faces charges now, accused of being a money mule. Besides that case, I have also received appeals during my Meet-the-People Sessions from families in Keat Hong who also faced similar situations. Mostly, these money mules were lured by the prospect of job opportunities and some were scammed out of their savings and forced to act as money mules in order to regain some of those monies back. We must ensure that the amendments strike a balance between protecting the public and also meting out the appropriate penalties commensurate to the crime and culpability.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, I stand in support of the amendment Bills which will help to further strengthen our vigilance against online scams and enforcement against money mules and abuses of Singpass accounts. With the increase in instances of reported cases of scams both globally and in Singapore, our fellow Singaporeans are even more susceptible to risks of being scammed and taken advantage of as unwitting money mules. We have heard from the Minister just now on the facts and figures. In the last two years, Singapore has lost about $1.2 billion to scams. Scam cases are now more than 1.5 times in number, compared to physical crimes. While we can increase public vigilance and awareness in our defence against scams, we need our legislative framework to remain up to date with technological developments in order to disrupt the operations of scammers, which are increasingly more sophisticated and challenging. One aspect is the use of money mules as a means to facilitate scams and getting scam proceeds out of Singapore. Currently, between 2020 and 2022, out of the more than 19,000 money mule cases investigated by the Police, only less than 250 cases were eventually prosecuted, as explained by the hon Minister. These cases involved amounts of more than $440 million. That is almost 20% of the entire scams in terms of quantum. Money mules are a key part of scammers' operations here in Singapore and I agree that there is a lacuna in the law that needs to be plugged. Currently, the evidential challenge is to prove that money mules have actual knowledge or intent to facilitate such criminal activities. Further, money mules are currently charged under the Computer Misuse Act for abetting a person to gain access to the bank account without authority.”
“In the past, as I had shared earlier in the case of Mdm Wati, not her real name, the process of receiving her child's maintenance not only took a long time, but it was also mentally exhausting and left her feeling dispirited. When a marriage ends, the couple should separate amicably, because even though they are no longer a family, the family ties and the love between the parents and their children should never cease to exist. I hope, with this new process, we can ensure that the child's maintenance can be provisioned as soon as possible and the responsibility of providing maintenance as a parent can be carried out. (In English): Sir, notwithstanding my clarifications and suggestions, I stand fully in support of the Bill.”
“So, not everyone would make a claim immediately upon breach. Fourthly, in some cases, there are other competing creditors. The usual refrain from the ex-spouse is that he or she had to pay off other loans or financial commitments first. The financial strain on the paying party is real. We need to balance their interests, too. This is especially in cases where the respondent has been declared bankrupt. In most cases, the applicant is unlikely to be able to recover any monies from an insolvent respondent. Hence, in this situation, what are the additional support that can be rendered to both parties? I understand that the reforms do not change the order of the priorities of an insolvent debtor. In bankruptcy proceedings, if there had been unfair preference or transactions at undervalue, those assets can be clawed back. Hence, I look forward to understanding how the proposed MEP and the current bankruptcy regime will work together. Lastly, what are the steps that MinLaw, together with MSF, will take to raise awareness of the MEP and render assistance to laypersons who do not know how to navigate the claims and applications? I also hope that the MEP will also apply equally for the enforcement of Syariah Court orders, especially on maintenance-like orders on payment of nafkah iddah and mutaah. In Malay, please, Sir. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] This amendment Bill will help applicants, like ex-spouses, to receive any outstanding maintenance much faster and allow the Courts, through its officers and special office, such as the MEO, to obtain the latest information on the financial status and income of relevant parties. This is a welcome change.”
“It is in this spirit that I stand fully in support of the Bill. I also welcome the protection of family violence survivors through limited cross-examination in certain circumstances. As raised in previous Parliamentary speeches, I hope that there can be default video conferencing facilities within the Family Justice Court (FJC) for young survivors to give evidence. This is to insulate them from further trauma on the stand. I understand that such infrastructure is already part of MinLaw's plans and I look forward to the implementation in this regard. I have the following further clarifications and suggestions. Firstly, on Maintenance Enforcement Officers (MEO), I hope to hear more the plans on recruitment, resourcing and training of such MEOs, especially given the caseload on the Courts and enforcement of not just FJC Court orders but also Syariah Court orders as well. Further, as MEOs encounter members of the public and, to a certain degree, may face hostile respondents or uncooperative third parties, may I ask what are the protection and immunity that will be accorded to MEOs? Secondly, can the Ministry consider having all such maintenance orders reflected on a searchable database registry that can be accessed on a "need-to-know" basis by financial institutions or public agencies? This is to allow would-be public service employers and banks to conduct due diligence for checks on background or credit worthiness. Thirdly, on claiming for past outstanding maintenance, one clarification that I have received is whether there is a time limitation period to make such claims under the MEP. Typically, as in the story I shared earlier, the victim would have had to endure many years of unpaid maintenance through protracted proceedings.”
“She finally sought help from the Legal Aid Bureau. She had to go to the Family Court, as it then was, to seek enforcement and variation of maintenance orders to feed her children and, at the same time, sort out her divorce proceedings before the Syariah Court, a Court case that was protracted by the ex-spouse all the way to the appellate stage. I recalled the maintenance order which, I found, was out of the ordinary. Typically, such orders would set out the amount to be paid for each child or spouse and the bank account details for such sums to be deposited. However, this one had not only the usual quantum and such details, but it also specified exactly what items that this ex-spouse had to purchase for the children, things like baby formula milk, diapers and even to specify the type of necessities – basic stuff like food and educational expenses. What kind of parent must be told and compelled to purchase sustenance for his own children? The ex-spouse had not only protracted proceedings but also taken such acrimonious and unreasonable positions which necessitated such specific orders. Eventually, the appellate Court held that she had a share and interest in the flat, notwithstanding that she was not listed as an owner. She also received settlement of the outstanding maintenance owed from the ex-spouse, but this was not before enduring a lengthy Court process. Throughout her ordeal, she almost gave up. She told me that she was fortunate to receive legal aid. Others may not have such fortunate ending. Mdm Wati's case highlighted to me the need for us to facilitate the maintenance enforcement process for any parent, whether man or woman, to seek what is rightfully their children's and to alleviate some of the burden that they carry after divorce.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, this Bill will introduce the enhanced Maintenance Enforcement Process (MEP) to facilitate maintenance outcomes for parties and will put our Judiciary in a good position to strengthen and mete out Therapeutic Justice in the divorce process. In my law practice, I handle some matrimonial cases on a pro bono basis. One such case was when I was assigned by the Legal Aid Bureau to represent a young mother of four in a divorce proceeding. That case shaped my thinking on how we can and should make it easier for estranged spouses to claim maintenance for their children when divorce occurs. Please allow me to share her story. Mdm Wati, not her real name, was only 19 years old when she got married and, as such, she was not named as a joint owner of the HDB flat that she lived with her husband because she was not yet 21 years old. Unfortunately, she was in an abusive relationship, suffering under the hands of an abusive husband she once loved. She was a housewife with no other sources of income and was wholly dependent on the sole breadwinner. She endured the strain of the relationship and the pain of the abuse and held on because of her young children. She would have had a fifth child if not for a miscarriage that she suffered after a beating so bad that she was hospitalised for a week. The doctors had to perform a hysterectomy and she can never have another child ever again. Finally, she mustered enough courage to seek divorce. However, she was faced back then with a system that was cumbersome and daunting for a single mother to navigate. The ex-spouse had sought to kick her and the children out of the matrimonial flat because she was not listed as an owner and refused to agree to any division of assets in her favour.”
“The fault lines in our society can be easily exploited, knowingly or unknowingly, through the differences in how we look, where we come from, whether or not we can speak a certain language, whether we belong to the same social standing or whether we agree or disagree on a particular policy. We cannot allow these to seep into the language of our politics and divide us. I concur with the President's call for all of us to close ranks and stand united regardless of race, religion or political affiliation, especially when it comes to core national interests. SG50, SG Together, SGUnited, SG Cares – all of these campaigns are reminders of what we can achieve when we remain united in our hearts and minds. Let us continue to stand with one another. I stand in support of the Motion.”
“At the same time, however, the President's speech recognised that the key challenge is to ensure that there was continued trust between the political leadership and our people and between Singaporeans. Our pillars of strength are peace and unity in diversity regardless of race, religion or political views. I agree that the approach and discussion of issues that concern our people and community should be discussed respectfully, responsibly, factually and judiciously. I agree that generally, for issues that are important to our country, many of us place national interests above individual rights. However, this is not always guaranteed and the critical challenge for all of us is to prioritise social cohesion and our country’s progress in an ever-changing post-pandemic world. Let us respond to the call for unity to ensure that while we achieve progress for our people and country, we do not overlook those who are in greater need so that they are not engulfed in the tide of modernity and change. We should not leave them behind because if everyone does not experience happiness and progress, our social fabric will be incomplete and imperfect – as the Malay proverb goes, it will be like an unfinished dress because the thread ran out and the needle broke. (In English): Mr Speaker, Sir, as our society grows through decades of nation-building, we have built a sense of identity and belonging as Singaporeans. However, who qualifies as a member of our society should not be narrowly defined and we should not be quick to succumb to the othering phenomenon and the pitting of "us" versus "them" – whatever "us" and "them" mean.”
“We must continue to promote and incentivise this "paying it forward" as part of our working culture here in Singapore and truly understand that there is no contradiction between doing what is best for the company and doing what is good for the community and nation. The President also emphasised that in paying it forward, we must help one another to stand tall with dignity and pride. This means that it is not patronising from the perspective of the person receiving. In this regard, I am glad that we have provided various uplifting measures that allow those who need a helping hand to get the boost they need to upgrade and upskill themselves in the path towards social mobility. This is a work in progress and we must continue to refine the approach and solutions in a targeted yet dignified and respectful manner without converting the social mobility ladder into a crutch of help that will be both belittling and debilitating. The last term of our Parliament session has also seen the Government afford more help through housing, healthcare and social welfare policies, passing legislation to form the Public Defender's Office to allow greater access to criminal justice and changes to the Misuse of Drugs Act, which affords greater vigilance against the scourge of drug abuse, especially on the vulnerable segments of our society. We must continue to keep a close eye on areas that will affect the social harmony and justice for the vulnerable groups in our society. Sir, in Malay, please. (In Malay): [Please refer to Vernacular Speech.] In my view, President Halimah's speech not only lays out the Government's priorities and future plans, but it also acknowledges how we managed to overcome the pandemic together as one people.”
“The new law is meant to consolidate all current legal powers dispersed across the Penal Code and Sedition Act to ensure the maintenance of racial harmony in Singapore. It will not only provide the powers to restrain someone from committing an offence regarding racism but also compel them to learn more about the other race. This understanding and appreciation of one another's values and cultures is the key towards breaking the cycle of ignorance and racism. I hope that the law will also offer protection to whistle-blowers who report such instances of racial prejudices and unfair employment practices. Besides protection and safeguards on our social cohesion, we also need ways to promote social solidarity. I agree with the President that as we strive for success and progress for our nation, we must not allow our society to stratify into those who have and those who are left behind. We need to build a sense of collective responsibility among us. We must appreciate the interdependence between people in our society. We must make Singaporeans feel that they can improve the lives of others and, in the same process, uplift their own lives in a meaningful way. This begins with our young. As such, I welcome the changes to our education system to promote greater social mixing and competency-based subject learning and the infusion of value-based interactions and engagements in our children's educational journey. In adulthood and working life, we see more businesses – both employers and employees – dedicate more pro bono hours towards corporate social responsibility activities on various causes that are beneficial to Singaporeans.”
“But how do we maintain such social cohesion and solidarity? Just like the Lego bricks, we need to strengthen the interlocking connections that bind us and guard against threats and external forces that seek to divide us and undermining our painstakingly built level of trust in the institutions of our nation and society. During the first half of this Parliament term, this House has debated and passed various pieces of legislation to further put us in better stead to withstand against such potential external forces through amendments to the Online Safety Act, enactment of the Foreign Interference (Countermeasures) Act and the formation of the Digital and Intelligence Service of the SAF. Externally, we must continue to remain vigilant and ensure our laws keep up to date with global trends, threats and developments. Internally, we must remain steadfast and committed to our Singaporean values of living in an open but multiracial and multi-religious society. The pandemic has laid bare the vulnerabilities of societies all over the world. Global studies have found that there is a correlation between the pandemic and explicit xenophobic and racial prejudices. Anti-discrimination or legislative guards against hate speech go some way but we also need a softer approach for a more enduring harmony. I look forward to the Government's plans to ensure that our laws remain relevant in maintaining our social and racial harmony. In particular, I am looking forward to the full implementation of the Maintenance of Racial Harmony Act, first announced by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong during the 2021 National Day Rally speech. This will complement the existing Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act passed since 1990.”
“This is not to say that we have to be monolithic or homogenous in our views and approach. We need courageous Singaporeans who are brave enough to experiment things differently, who dare to speak up and are willing to stand up for the issues that matter to all Singaporeans. Inevitably, this part of the nation-building process means that there will necessarily be divergent views – each with its own benefits and trade-offs. The rigour of debates and contestation of ideas on issues that are important to Singaporeans can help all of us formulate new ways forward for Singapore. Iron sharpens iron. However, at the same time, such discussions must be done respectfully and responsibly, based on facts and on honest terms. Whether these discussions are in the halls of this House or in the comfort of our homes, we can hold different opinions but we must believe in the same vision for the betterment of Singapore. This must be our pillar of strength – our unity in diversity regardless of race, religion or political inclinations. Through the Forward Singapore conversations, the Government's call to involve various stakeholders – employers, workers, community partners, civil society and, indeed, all Singaporeans – in our nation-building means that we would be able to tap on our nation's greatest resource; not our Reserves but each other's strengths and expertise. We must unlock our collective spirit to help one another. This is the principle of social solidarity where the people, through its government, bear equally the responsibility and burden for helping fellow citizens. The task of helping the underprivileged or vulnerable in our society does not fall on the shoulders of the Government or civil society alone but on all of us.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, in my maiden speech three years ago in a similar Address of Thanks, I talked about the building blocks of our nation and society. I likened it to the Lego bricks that my son loves to play with. First, at the core of its structure, each brick must be strong. This is the family unit and each of us, fellow Singaporeans. Second, the interlocking connection between each brick must be strong. This is our social cohesion that makes building something bigger than ourselves not just possible but also durable in the long run. Third, the different shapes and sizes of each Lego brick not only complement one another but also when combined makes them unique and vibrant. This is our multiracial and multi-religious society that makes Singapore rich not only in culture but also diverse in views and expertise. This is why I resonate with the Address of the President, which reiterates the Government's commitment to strengthen our basic building blocks – our families and fellow Singaporeans – by holding on to our core values of fairness, inclusivity, mutual support and giving back to society. These values were embodied in the many success stories of our everyday Singaporeans working together with the Government, the community and the businesses to help all of us get through the pandemic together. For me, President Halimah's speech not only presented the Government's priorities and plans in the coming period, but it also acknowledged how we managed to overcome the pandemic and its challenges together as one society. The President's speech also reminded us that we face an important challenge to ensure that there remains continued trust between the political leadership and our people and between all of us fellow Singaporeans.”
“One is about our operations; whenever we make arrests, all these, we will share. Secondly, we also share about the harms of drugs. Recently, Mr Christopher de Souza asked about how we can share further, and I shared that it is something that we will continue to do. Just a few days ago, I shared about the harms of cannabis on my social media platform. This is also what CNB does. We plan all these holistically, so that we try our best to reach out to the people whom we engage and how we can reach out further with others that we may not have engaged. So, going forward, we are exploring ways to navigate this deeper and expand our outreach. Because at the end of the day, as I have shared, with the global situation, I think the only way to go forward is to continue this journey and get as many partners as possible to be on board this journey and protect as many people as possible, especially in Singapore, from the harms of drugs and at the same time, keep our aspiration high for a drug-free Singapore.”
“Thank you, Speaker. I also thank the Minister of State for answering the questions. For clarity in my speech, when I referred to specific focus on youths, I was actually mooting for greater efforts on the part of MHA to prevent drug abuse amongst youths. I do have one clarification for the Minister of State. Most of our PDE efforts for youths, are in our schools and the Institutes of Higher Learning. But we need resources for parents to cope as well, especially with new drugs and NPS. Would MHA continue to work with Ministries and other independent bodies to help parents cope with these new drugs and new challenges that parents may face? In fact, I think CNB had a publication for parents previously called, "start talking before they start taking"? So, maybe those resources can be updated and there can be a sustained effort for parents as well. Assoc Prof Dr Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim: Sir, I thank the Member for the clarification. As I have shared in my answer, we have the NCPR platform where we not only look at efforts across agencies and the different community organisations, but we also look at specific areas that we want to focus on. One of the areas that we are looking at today is also about youths' addiction issues, substance abuse – that is one aspect. The other aspect, CNB as the Member has shared, has its own PDE efforts. The efforts are not only linked with other organisations, but also look at the different segments of the society – parents, students. At the last MHA COS, I shared that the schools are committed to play a more active role in this aspect, in working together with CNB. We will try to see how we can enhance that effort. Another thing that we do, if you look at CNB's social media platforms, they are very active. We share various types of resources.”
“He was introduced to drugs by people who knew of his precarious emotional state and took advantage of him to lure him into addiction. Once hooked, he had to pay through his nose, sometimes four or five times higher than the drug's street value, in order to avoid being detected or recognised. He has since served his time and rehabilitated himself. He now volunteers in the Anti-Drug Abuse Advocacy A3 Network with the National Council Against Drug Abuse (NCADA) and CNB. As a young and successful professional, he may not fit the mould of a stereotypical drug abuser. His story shows that our fight against drug abuse must be made on behalf of every segment of our society – our youths, our children, our workers – and we face battlefronts everywhere – our schools, our workplaces, our homes. Drug traffickers drive addiction to feed their greed for profits, at the expense of families and communities. They will continue to introduce new drugs and new ways to circumvent our laws and influence our people, but just as they are relentless in their ways, we must, similarly, be tireless in our vigilance to protect the minds and safety of our people, steward the future and potential of our youths. In this fight against drugs, we cannot let them win. Sir, I support the Bills.”
“Sir, another major concern is the softening attitudes among the young towards drugs – in particular, cannabis – including the prevalence of drug abuse depiction in popular culture. According to CNB, 26% of all drug abusers arrested were below 30 years old. Out of all the new abusers arrested, half of them were aged below 30. The number of youth abusers below 20 years old caught abusing cannabis, has also increased threefold since 2021. This Bill makes it a specific offence for anyone causing or procuring a young person to commit any offence relating to psychoactive substances, under the new section 11Q. This is the correct move to make. In addition, we need to be wary of the prevalence of the vaping culture trend worldwide. While nicotine is commonly consumed through vaping, these cigarettes can also be used as a way to deliver other controlled drugs, such as methamphetamine and heroin. In fact, vaping has become a common way of inhaling cannabis. In Canada, 29% of cannabis-using individuals aged 15 years and older, indicated that vaping is their preferred method for cannabis use. There is a strong link and risk between vaping use and drug abuse. Although it is already illegal here, we need to step up on enforcement and education on the harms of vaping. Vaping instruments also come in various shapes and forms. Some are even small and discrete, making it difficult to detect. Hence, can the Minister of State please share the strategy and actions that MHA will be taking in concert with the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) or other agencies against vaping? Sir, in closing, I would like to share a story about a young professional I knew who, unfortunately, fell into drugs after a bout of personal difficulties and mental health issues.”