YouSaid · the spoken record

Wisnumurti

lines on the record: 497
first: 1992-07-15
most recent: 1997-03-06
sittings or episodes: 62
sources: un-security-council

Every line below is reproduced as it was said and linked to the record it came from. Nothing here is summarised or generated. Directory · Search · Corrections

“Hence, a settlement of this conflict can brook no further delay. We cannot allow the Bosnian Serbs to dictate their own terms for a political settlement and thereby undermine the latest peace plan. We believe that it provides a viable basis for a peaceful solution to the conflict. I wish to emphasize that, in order to ensure its acceptance by the Bosnian Serbs, it is imperative for the members of the Security Council to support any initiatives to lift the arms embargo. Meanwhile, such action should be complemented by sustained diplomatic efforts to achieve that acceptance.”
1994-11-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3454Resumption1 (1994) · source
“If the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina has the necessary means to repel aggression, that will compel the Bosnian Serbs to reassess their options and realize the futility of imposing their will through force. It will bring about a comprehensive and a durable cessation of hostilities, ensure compliance with the principles of the Charter as well as the decisions of the Council, and thereby create conditions conducive to a political settlement on the basis of the peace plan proposed by the Contact Group. In view of this, the lifting of the arms embargo is the only viable option open to the international community. In conclusion, those who are responsible for the tragedy that has befallen the people of Bosnia and Herzegovina cannot be allowed to continue their deeds with impunity.”
1994-11-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3454Resumption1 (1994) · source
“While the former were reflected in the prospects for an immediate end to the hostilities, the latter consisted of warnings of punitive measures if the peace plan were rejected. It is very regrettable that although the Bosnian Serbs have spurned the peace proposals they have largely escaped retribution. The Bosnian Government, on the other hand, which has accepted the peace plan despite its serious shortcomings, continues to be denied the means to defend itself. When the world community has failed to take effective measures to terminate aggression, it is neither legal nor morally tenable to use the blanket enforcement of the ban on the delivery of arms to prevent Bosnia and Herzegovina from defending itself. It should not be denied its inherent right to defend itself in accordance with Article 51 of the Charter.”
1994-11-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3454Resumption1 (1994) · source
“Condemnations, wamings, sanctions and _ international isolation have not deterred them from their murderous campaign and wilful violation of their commitments. Not being compelled to negotiate, the aggressors have unashamedly continued to use their superiority in weapons to achieve their political and military goals of uniting in a "Greater Serbia". Their intransigence and their rejection of the latest peace plan has rendered the lifting of the arms embargo unavoidable. It has also put the peaceful settlement of the conflict in jeopardy. The peace plan launched by the five-nation Contact Group offered both incentives and disincentives to the parties directly concerned.”
1994-11-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3454Resumption1 (1994) · source
“Lifting the embargo, it has been contended, would only widen and deepen the war and jeopardize the role of the United Nations Protection Force (UNPROFOR),; the influx of arms would inevitably lead to more casualties; it would even intensify hostilities, with all their consequences; it would not contribute to a durable peace and would be counter-productive; and all this would undermine the negotiating process, which still represents our best hope. Despite those self-serving arguments, it cannot be denied that the embargo imposed in 1991 on the former Yugoslavia froze the advantage in weapons in favour of the Bosnian Serbs, who used it effectively to rout the nascent Bosnian army and seize large chunks of Bosnian territory.”
1994-11-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3454Resumption1 (1994) · source
“The lifting of the arms embargo has become imperative in the present circumstances, in which Bosnia and Herzegovina has to fight aggressors who have no intention of seeking a just and durable settlement. It is therefore incumbent upon the Council to pronounce itself unequivocally on the non-applicability of Security Council resolution 713 (1991) to the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. We would regard it as a grave injustice if the ill-conceived arms embargo were not lifted. We are not convinced by the arguments advanced by some States for the maintenance and enforcement of the ban on armaments.”
1994-11-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3454Resumption1 (1994) · source
“In fact, preventing the victims of aggression from defending themselves has already led to the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women and children and the maiming and torturing of countless others. In the face of such unspeakable horrors, the Bosnians have no choice but to defend themselves. My delegation and an overwhelming majority of Member States have been calling for the past two years for the lifting of the embargo unjustly imposed on the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. In this connection I wish to recall that Indonesia was a sponsor of the draft resolution on this matter recently adopted by the General Assembly.”
1994-11-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3454Resumption1 (1994) · source
“It has been self-evident that aggression has been sustained due to the stark military imbalance in armaments that has assured a huge advantage for the Bosnian Serbs in terms of weapons. Consequently, it has led to the unleashing of a reign of terror, massive violence and the brutal violation of human rights and international humanitarian law, causing untold human suffering. The inexorable process of "ethnic cleansing" and mass expulsions has been intensified. None the less, the pleas of the people of Bosnia for effective international intervention, or at least the lifting of the arms embargo, have gone unheeded. The consequences of a continued arms embargo on both the aggressors and their victims will ensure that atrocities and the killing of defenceless civilians will continue unabated.”
1994-11-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3454Resumption1 (1994) · source
“These horrible scenes have been repeated in all their intensity, particularly in the past year, and have had ramifications for the future not only of Bosnia but also of the Balkan region as a whole. We are gravely concerned that a continuation of this unequal war may lead to a new situation as Bosnia and Herzegovina faces the dangerous prospect of a forcible dismantling of its multi-ethnic, multicultural and multireligious society, the brutal decimation of its people and the diminution of its independence and sovereignty. The continued refusal to allow the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina to defend itself and to protect its people from slaughter can only be seen as a denial of the right to individual or collective self-defence as enshrined in the Charter.”
1994-11-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3454Resumption1 (1994) · source
“Madam President, I should like, at the outset, to extend my delegation's congratulations on your assumption of the presidency of the Council for this month. We remain fully confident that during your tenure, our deliberations on the issues now under consideration will lead to the introduction of effective measures. May I also take this opportunity to express our appreciation to your predecessor, Sir David Hannay of the United Kingdom, for his able guidance of the Council last month. For almost three years the Security Council has been seized of the conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which is posing a continuing threat to international peace and security. The death and destruction it has brought and the suffering and the atrocities it has inflicted are of such magnitude that they have galvanized the attention of the world.”
1994-11-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3454Resumption1 (1994) · source
“It is self-evident that determined action by the Security Council is now imperative. The status of Gorazde and other cities as safe areas must be 22 enforced, and Bosnia and Herzegovina must be exempted from the arms embargo imposed by the Security Council. At the same time, new diplomatic initiatives to establish a cease-fire in Gorazde and its vicinity, and the whole territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, as well as efforts to find a political settlement to the conflict, must be pursued. Lastly, the safety and freedom of United Nations personnel must be secured.”
1994-04-21 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3367 (1994) · source
“It calls not only for the immediate lifting of the arms embargo against the Republic of Bosnia, but also for a change in the mandate of UNPROFOR. And it calls for concerted military action against Serbian command posts, ammunition dumps and heavy weapons. The Consultative Meeting of Foreign Ministers of Non-Aligned Countries held in Jakarta last February called for more effective measures by the Security Council to end the genocide and carnage in Bosnia. The Meeting also raised the possibility of convening an appropriately structured international conference on Bosnia. Pressure, condemnation, warnings, sanctions and isolation have failed to persuade the Serbs to refrain from their murderous campaign and the willful violation of their commitments. Now more than ever, the credibility of this august body is at stake.”
1994-04-21 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3367 (1994) · source
“The imminent collapse of the city has already revealed the futility of the limited use of force. The limited air strikes which came too little and too late did not deter the aggressors. The brutal fact is that a mere pair of bombing runs has not provided protection to the besieged Bosnians. It is certainly a humbling moment for the international community to watch Gorazde's defence crumble and Serbian tanks roll into an area that the United Nations has already declared a "safe area". These have in fact become nothing more than areas under constant shelling, open jails and refugee camps. This intolerable situation has placed the people of Bosnia into what may become a major humanitarian catastrophe. It has been rightly described as grim.”
1994-04-21 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3367 (1994) · source
“A 21 credible response to these questions has now become urgent for the people of Bosnia in the face of increasingly brazen Serbian aggression with its attendant unconscionable toll in human lives and material destruction. After solemnly pledging to observe numerous cease-fires, the Serbian army has unleashed a campaign of terror which is no doubt intended to subdue and subjugate the inhabitants of Gorazde. The military objective behind this relentless bombardment, whose targets include a hospital and refugee sites, is equally self-evident: it straddles the road that links Serbia with the illegally held territory in southern Bosnia. The consequences of this grave situation in Gorazde to the territorial integrity and the independence of the Republic of Bosnia can not escape our attention.”
1994-04-21 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3367 (1994) · source
“It was the understanding of many Member States, including Indonesia, that those areas would be temporary, would ensure the safety of the civilians, guarantee an international military presence and assure the unimpeded presence of UNHCR and other humanitarian agencies, as well as the right to humanitarian assistance and, most importantly, security against military attacks. In this context, we also deem it pertinent to recall the Secretary General's report of May 1993 which raised two fundamental questions: What would the United Nations do if the aggressors were first to accept the establishment of safe areas but later refused to withdraw their forces? Would it then clear the way for the Security Council to use force and compel them to withdraw?”
1994-04-21 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3367 (1994) · source
“This meeting has been convened against the backdrop of a rapidly deteriorating situation in the on-going conflict in the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina, particularly the unconscionable siege of Gorazde and the brutal and indiscriminate shelling and attacks against that city and its vicinity, whose innocent population has been subjected to the brutality of Bosnian Serb forces. We recall in this context Security Council resolutions 819 (1993) and 824 (1993) of last year, which established the so-called safe areas, first in Srebrenica and then in Sarajevo, Gorazde, Zepa, Tuzla and Bihac.”
1994-04-21 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3367 (1994) · source
“On behalf of my delegation, I should like to extend congratulations to you, Sir, on your assumption of the presidency of the Council for the month of April. We remain confident that, under your able guidance, our deliberations on the issue under consideration will lead to the initiation of effective measures. May I also avail myself of this opportunity to express our appreciation to your predecessor, Ambassador Merimee of France, for his able leadership of the Council last month.”
1994-04-21 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3367 (1994) · source
“It is my delegation's earnest hope that this draft resolution, if implemented in full, will lead to an immediate end to this agonizing conflict and will also provide a long-term solution to the crisis. I am pleased to convey the request of my Government that Indonesia be included in the list of sponsors of draft resolution S/25997.”
1993-06-29 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3247 (1993) · source
“The imperative need, then, is the for the United Nations peace-keeping forces in Bosnia and Herzegovina to be strengthened for enforcement action under the provisions of Chapter VII of the Charter. The draft resolution of the non-aligned caucus now before the Council reaffirms the sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of Bosnia and Herzegovina. I fully concur with the statement made by the coordinator of the caucus when he so eloquently introduced the draft resolution. The draft resolution also calls for the arms embargo to be lifted for the sole purpose of enabling Bosnia and Herzegovina to exercise its inherent right to self- defence.”
1993-06-29 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3247 (1993) · source
“In conclusion, Indonesia and other non-aligned countries are firmly committed to the peaceful settlement of disputes. We believe that a renewal of dialogue in good faith i; essential to resolve this crisis and that a negotiated solution within the framework of appropriate international mechanisms is still within reach. But it is self-evident that the aggressors have become increasingly brazen and contemptuous of those who are trying to end the carnage; hence, the Council can no longer remain passive in the face of the defiance or flouting of the international will. The decisions taken now may well reverberate beyond the conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina and determine the course of events in the post-cold-war era.”
1993-06-29 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3247 (1993) · source
“Lifting the arms embargo would render the Serbian policy of territorial acquisition by the use of force much more costly; hence, the contention that even a selective lifting of the embargo would be counter-productive and might even lead to a widening of the conflict can no longer be sustained. At a minimum, therefore, the embargo against the Bosnian Government should be lifted. Against the backdrop of the grave situation prevailing in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the World Conference on Human Rights held this month in Vienna adopted a special declaration and urged the Security Council to fulfil its responsibilities under the Charter, especially those under Article 24, and thereby restore the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Bosnia and Herzegovina.”
1993-06-29 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3247 (1993) · source
“Since the international community - or some of its members - has been unwilling or unable to defeat the aggression perpetrated against a sovereign State, there is a moral responsibility not to deny that State the right to defend itself. The arms embargo was in fact instrumental in facilitating the land grab, the "ethnic cleansing" and the process towards the creation of a "Greater Serbia". Thus, the arms embargo has proven to be largely ineffective in ending the Serbian onslaught: it has tied the hands of Bosnian Muslims in the face of the overwhelming military advantage enjoyed by the Bosnian Serbs, and has enabled the Bosnian Serbs to proceed with their devious plans, which are devoid of any humanitarian considerations.”
1993-06-29 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3247 (1993) · source
“Taken together, the plan and its principles recognize that Bosnia and Herzegovina will be a decentralized State, with most governing 'unctions to be carried out by the provinces. Although the plan represents an enforced compromise between the aggressors and their victims, the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina has nonetheless accepted the proposals contained therein in the cause of peace and of saving lives. The Government and people of Bosnia and Herzegovina have been subjected to continued and intensified bombardment while Bosnians have been deprived of their inherent right to self-defence. How long will the international community tolerate killings, murder and genocide against the people of Bosnia and Herzegovina while the S:rbs make a mockery of the efforts to attain a peaceful settlement of the :risis?”
1993-06-29 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3247 (1993) · source
“In my Government's view, a settlement of the crisis in Bosnia and Herzegovina can brook no further delay. We can no longer procrastinate. Of immediate importance are the implementation of an effective cease-fire; the reinforcement of humanitarian operations; an end to the bombardment of civilian populations and the surrender of heavy weapons to the peace-keeping forces. Furthermore, the Vance-Owen plan, along with its constitutional principles, the provisional map, interim as well as peace arrangements, must be implemented, as it constitutes a viable modality for peacefully resolving the conflict. The plan spells out terms for a cease-fire, the separation of combatants and the demilitarization of the country.”
1993-06-29 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3247 (1993) · source
“Furthermore, the cynical plan advanced by the aggressors would partition Bosnia and Herzegovina in utter disregard of the sacrosanct principle of the inviolability of the territorial integrity of States and would herd its people into less than a tenth of their territory: it is a blatant attempt to divide Bosnia and Herzegovina along ethnic lines and create States-within-a-State that would take the Bosnian Serbs closer to their proclaimed goal of an independent State that would ultimately link with the former Yugoslavia to form a "Greater Serbia", It would codify and reward aggression; it would result in an enforced transfer of population; it would ignite an already explosive situation and further undermine the stability of the region. Hence, we should categorically reject the insidious design to partition Bosnia and Herzegovina.”
1993-06-29 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3247 (1993) · source
“The announcement of the Joint Action Programme last month in Washington has further compounded the situation. We have serious doubts concerning how effective it will be to implement the Vance-Owen plan on a step-by-step basis, which is the concept underlying the Joint Action Programme.”
1993-06-29 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3247 (1993) · source
“For over a year now, the Council has been seized of the rapidly deteriorating situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina and has adopted numerous resolutions, always in the hope of terminating the conflict. Thus, the embargo on weapons, the imposition of economic sanctions, the ban on military flights over Bosnia's air space, as well as the decision to facilitate humanitarian aid and the establishment of safe areas, have justifiably heightened the expectations of many Member States that those measures would suffice to end the aggression, halt the genocide and end the forcible land grab. To our profound regret, however, those decisions have been met with contempt and scorn, and have emboldened the aggressors to intensify the brutalization of a defenceless people, particularly when the Council demurred at taking enforcement action.”
1993-06-29 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3247 (1993) · source
“Ever since the eruption of hostilities more than a year ago, a State Member of the United Nations has been subjected to unabated aggression, with a horrendous toll in human life and material devastation. We have witnessed systematic attempts progressively to decimate a people through the unconscionable policy of "ethnic cleansing" and the massive violation of basic human rights and fundamental freedoms. Consequently, two thirds of Bosnian territory has now come under Serbian occupation, while the few remaining towns under Bosnian control are under relentless bombardment, resulting in even more death and destruction, forced expulsions, mass starvation and the denial of desperately needed humanitarian aid and assistance.”
1993-06-29 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3247 (1993) · source
“Let me at the outset extend my delegation's congratulations to you, Sir, on your assumption of the presidency of the Council for this month. We are confident that under your able guidance, the Council's deliberations will be brought to a successful conclusion, I should like also to pay a well-deserved tribute to your predecessor, Ambassador Yuliy Vorontsov of the Russian Federation, for the able guidance and leadership he provided to the Council last month. Let me also take this opportunity to express our appreciation to the members of the Council for giving us the opportunity to participate in this debate. It is with a deepening sense of distress and grief that we in the Non-Aligned Movement have watched the tragedy that is unfolding in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina.”
1993-06-29 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3247 (1993) · source
“as well as the European Comauaity ead ite Monitoring Mission. Ia cvaclvueion, Indunesia secoguises the lamuteble principle of the faviolapility of tntesnationelly recognised troatiers and will not recognize 4 eituetion created by o pulicy of Lait accompli. The draft resolution before the Council de eloquent testimuny to the members' deep concera regardiag the eitvetivua in Bosale and Mersegovine. It is our hope that it will be adopted by @ coasessus decisioa.”
1992-11-16 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3136 (1992) · source
“Furthermore, my delegation supports the Malaysisn proposal for the imaediate creation of safety zones to ensure the security of the Bosnian Muslim population, The Council] shovld eleo entrust the Secretary-Geserel with the necessary suthority and support to move beyond a peace-keeping operation into an sctive peacemaking roie. Concurrently, the Council should continue to exert efforts with the European Community in order to enlarge and consolidate support for the cause of Bosnia and Herzegovins, leading to the esteblishment: of a multiethnic, multiracial and muitireligious society io Bosnia and Herzegovina, My Gelegatiun commends the efforte undertaken by the Secretary-Genera) auc such United Bations bodies ae the Office of the High Commiasioner for Bet..qece ead the Freteution Farce ta Yugvelavia.”
1992-11-16 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3136 (1992) · source
“The decision to enlarge the mandate and further to strengthen the United Nations Protection Force in Yugoslavia, the military protection of humanitarian aid convoys and the ban on military flights represents a modicum of progress, which should be seized upon to defuse the situation. However, the Council has an obligation to take further appropriate action, including enforcement measures, to end hostilities end to restore the territorial integrity and unity of Bosnia and Herzegovina. it should endorse the appeal made by Turkey to lift the arma embargo against Bosnis and Herzegovina and uphold ite right to self-defence under the Charter.”
1992-11-16 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3136 (1992) · source
“It has faithfully implemented the decisions of the London Conference, and it has cooperated in implementing the resolutions adopted by the General Assembly and the Security Council. But the hope fur peace, sought by Bosnia and Herzegovina, has beer shattered by the merciless onslaught of the Serbian forces that has unleashed a virtual reign of terror. Hence, determined action has become imperative to bring the caruage in Bosnia and Herzegovina to an end. The most urgent ueed is the cessation of fighting, the enforcement of the cease-fire aud the protection of relief supplies. The Security Council bas already taken the firat important steps towards the adoption of effective measures to stop the suffering of the people of Bosnia and Herzegovina.”
1992-11-16 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3136 (1992) · source
“It is to be regretted that, despite the intense diplomatic efforts and actions of the European Community and the United Nations to contein the conflict, every day has brought new and more ominous reports of escalating levels of violence, mounting casualties and increased human privation. Indeed, the situation has markedly worsened owing to the continued aggression, the relentless bombardment of cities and towns and the forced expulsions. Further exacerbating the situation is the blatant violation both of the London accords and of the decisions of this body. Throughout the ordeal the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina has demonstrated its good faith in seeking a peaceful settlement of the conflict. It unequivocally accepted the principles outlined in the proposed constitutional framework.”
1992-11-16 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3136 (1992) · source
“The Tenth Summit Conference of Non-Aligned Countries, held in Jakarta last September, expressed grave concern over the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina and condemned the massive violation of human rights and the unconscionable policy of "ethnic cleansing". The Summit therefore demanded the immediate cessation of hostilities, the speedy withdrawal of all external forces from the territory, the deployment of United Nations peace-keeping forces, the freeing of all prisoners, the dismantling of camps, prisons and other places of detention, and the exercise of the right of refugees to return to their homes.”
1992-11-16 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3136 (1992) · source
“For somo time now my Government has noted with deepening concern the tragic chain of events that have engulfed Bosnia and Herzegovina, Following the referendum held last February and the subsequent declaratian o¢ independence, Bosnia and Herzegovina became a victim of unabashed aggression resulting in horrendous loss of life as well as the destruction of historical landmarks, hospitals and schools. The gravity of the situation has been made fully evident by the unmitigated violence and bloodshed, py the barbarism of paramilitary groups in the newly seized territory, by the massive influx of refugees to neighbouring countries and by repeated violations of cease-fire agreements. My Government is appalled by this grim state of affairs.”
1992-11-16 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3136 (1992) · source
“It is with a deep sense of sorrow and anguish that my delegation is addressing this meeting today while the people of Bosnia and Herzegovina are being subjected to the darkest moment in their history. The continuing reports of atrocities and the resultant human suffering have aroused the conscience of mankind. At this critical juncture, therefore, the international community is in duty bound to take immediate and resolute action not only to alleviate the suffering of a poople but also to forestall attempts to dismember a newly independent nation.”
1992-11-16 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3136 (1992) · source
“Cyrus Vance and Lord Owen for the statements they delivered last waek and for their unremitting efforts to seek a negotiated solution to the conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina. We are also grateful to the High Commissioner for Refugees and to the Special Rapporteur on human rights for their incisive statements. Taken together, they portray a sombre picture of the catastrophic dimension of the situation prevailing in that hapless nation. My delegation has endorsed the decision of the Organization of Islamic Conference (GIC) to request the convening of the Security Council in order to consider the rapidly deteriorating situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The OIC deserves our commendation for its endeavours in focusing the attention of the international community on this question.”
1992-11-16 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3136 (1992) · source
“I should like, on behalf of my delegation, to express our congratulations to you, Sir, on your assumption of the presidency of the Council for this month. We remain confident that with your extensive experience and diplomatic skills, you will guide our deliberations to a successful conclusion. I also wish to pay a well-deserved tribute to your predecessor. the Permanent Representative of France, Ambassador Merimee, for the able guidance he provided to the Council during last month. Let me avail myself of this opportunity to express our appreciation to you and to the other members of the Council for giving us the opportunity to participate in this debate. We are deeply indebted to Mr.”
1992-11-16 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3136 (1992) · source
“To conclude, my delegation would like to lend its support to the proposal that the Secretary-General appoint a Special Representative in order to assist in bringing an effective end to the violence and in order te create conditions for negotiations leading to a peaceful transition to a democratic, non-racial and united South Africa,”
1992-07-15 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3095 (1992) · source
“It is pertinent to recall that the Non-Aligned Movement has since its inception called for the dismantling of institutionalized racism in South Africa. Hence, at this critical stage in the struggle for a non-racial and democratic society, it is incumbent upon us to call upon the Government of South Africa to move decisively and quickly in resolving the deadlock over the transfer of power and to build a new society. The voices of the disenfranchised and oppressed can no longer be silenced. Racial reconciliation, equality of rights and majority rule will triumph and the people of South Africa will become free.”
1992-07-15 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3095 (1992) · source
“The need for action has become imperative in view of the manoeuvres of the regime to perpetuate apartheid, which are bound to impact adversely on the ongoing endeavours for a negotiated solution. It is Pretoria's responsibility to control township violence and to maintain law and order. My delegation therefore calls upon the Pretoria regime not to exploit the rivalries that divide a frustrated and impoverished majority or to foment unrest in the country. Over the past two years, developments of far-reaching importance have taken place in South Africa leading to the establishment of a post-apartheid society. In this regard, my delegation extends its full support for the CODESA process, which we hope will be resumed to make a renewed and determined effort to finalize the terms for the transitional period.”
1992-07-15 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3095 (1992) · source
“In this context, my delegation endorses the decision taken by the Organization of African Unity at its meeting held last month in Dakar, Senegal, which inter alia called for an urgent meeting of this body to investigate the causes of violence, to take necessary measures and to create conditions conducive to a peaceful transition in South Africa. Unless the Council proceeds to take action as a matter of urgency, the situation in South Africa may deteriorate further with unforeseen consequences. The international community can no longer countenance barriers to justice and equality, and the South African Government must be held accountable for its policies.”
1992-07-15 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3095 (1992) · source
“These developments therefore constitute a serious setback to the continuation of any meaningful negotiations and to the eradication of apartheid. It is obvious that notwithstanding the important milestones on South Africa's irreversible course of reform, the regime's duplicitous policies have reinforced suspicion of its intention to perpetuate minority rule. Its failure to prevent the spiralling violence, aided and abetted by the security forces, provides an unambiguous confirmation of this belief and cannot but intensify the resistance to racial domination.”
1992-07-15 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3095 (1992) · source
“Furthermore, the potential for destabilization by extremist groups also remains a cause for deep concern. The situation has been markedly exacerbated by the escalating level of violence which has already taken a heavy toll in human lives. My Government was particularly appalled by the recent gruesome massacre at Boipatong Township. These wanton attacks have shown that the perpetrators are determined to terrorize township communities and create chaos in the country at large. Regrettably, the collusion of the security forces and the regime's ineffectual response to the killings of innocent men, women and children have shaken the confidence of the black majority in the impartiality of the Government.”
1992-07-15 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3095 (1992) · source
“Makwetu of the Pan Africanist Congress of Azania (PAC) for his lucid presentation. This meeting has been convened to deal with the disturbing deveiopments taking place in South Africa which makes it incumbent upon my delegation to participate in these debates. For some time now political tensions in South Africa have been increasing in the wake of a stalemate in talks between the racist regime and anti-apartheid leaders. There has been concern that the negotiations under the auspices of the Convention for a Democratic South Africa (CODESA) could break because of the insistence that certain provisions of the new constitution be subject to a veto by the minority, which has cast an ominous Shadow on the peaceful transition to Majority rule.”
1992-07-15 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3095 (1992) · source
“Mr. President, at the outset, I should like on behalf of my delegation to express appreciation to you and to other members of the Council for giving us the opportunity to participate in these deliberations. Allow me to extend to you, Sir, my delegation's congratulations upon your assumption of the Council's presidency for this month. We are confident that, with your extensive experience and diplomatic skills, you will guide the proceedings to a successful conclusion. I should also like to pay a well-deserved tribute to your predecessor for his able leadership of the Council in June. Let me avail myself of this opportunity warmly to welcome Mr. Nelson Mandela, the President of the African National Congress (ANC), and to congratulate him on his important address to the Council. My appreciation goes also to Mr.”
1992-07-15 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3095 (1992) · source