YouSaid · the spoken record

Wisnumurti

lines on the record: 497
first: 1992-07-15
most recent: 1997-03-06
sittings or episodes: 62
sources: un-security-council

Every line below is reproduced as it was said and linked to the record it came from. Nothing here is summarised or generated. Directory · Search · Corrections

“This delay is mainly due to the acute shortage of personnel and resources. My delegation therefore would like to call upon the international community to be more forthcoming in providing the necessary assistance to Rwanda in this respect in order to restore the functions of the judicial system. In the light of these considerations, my delegation will vote in favour of the draft resolution now before us.”
1995-06-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3542 (1995) · source
“In our view, addressing in a comprehensive manner this particular problem, which is one of the major concerns of the Government of Rwanda, would require cooperation not only between the Government of Rwanda and UNAMIR, but also with the neighbouring countries. A regional approach towards resolving the matter would therefore be most welcome. Despite the fact that some progress has been achieved, there are still some difficulties faced by the Government of Rwanda that have created tensions and frustrations, which my delegation fully appreciates and sympathizes with. In this context, I would like to point out that delay in bringing the perpetrators of genocide to justice, through both the national judicial system and the International Tribunal, is one of the underlying causes.”
1995-06-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3542 (1995) · source
“It is the considered view of my delegation that efforts to enhance the security situation in Rwanda are indeed indispensable for a climate of stability and trust to prevail, which would positively affect the flow of returning refugees. We are, however, aware that all these undertakings should be based on genuine national reconciliation among the various elements of Rwandan society. Nevertheless, these efforts will not bring about the desired results if the supply of arms and materiel to elements of the previous Government continue unabated, with the ensuing consequence of cross-border militarization.”
1995-06-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3542 (1995) · source
“My delegation is particularly encouraged that the Government of Rwanda is taking the primary responsibility in providing security to its citizens, which is a fundamental task for a sovereign State. It was in this connection that my delegation fully supported the request made by the Government of Rwanda substantially to reduce the military component of UNAMIR. This reduction not only symbolizes the restoration of the sovereignty and dignity of the Government of Rwanda, but also reflects the reality in the field. My delegation therefore welcomes the agreement reached by the Government of Rwanda and the United Nations to reduce the force level to 2,330 troops within three months of the adoption of this draft resolution and to 1,800 troops within four months.”
1995-06-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3542 (1995) · source
“It is with great pleasure that my delegation expresses its congratulations to you, Sir, on your assumption of the presidency of the Council for the month of June. Allow me also to express our appreciation to Ambassador Merimee of France for his skilful leadership during the month of May, when he presided over the Council's activities. Regarding the extension of the mandate of the United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR), my delegation is cognizant of the significant role UNAMIR has played in contributing to the prevailing stable condition in Rwanda, which I believe will substantially contribute to the process of national reconciliation, rehabilitation and economic reconstruction. It is therefore imperative for the Government of Rwanda to maintain such favourable conditions in order for a just and durable peace to be achieved.”
1995-06-09 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3542 (1995) · source
“The international community must take the necessary and appropriate steps to ensure that agreements reached in the Middle East peace process are fully implemented and ensure the progression of its positive achievements. Ultimately, only by working together through confidence- building measures, and not through confidence-destroying measures, such as the expropriation of Arab lands, is it possible to achieve a comprehensive and durable settlement to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and peace in the Middle East. In the light of these considerations, my delegation commends to the Council the draft resolution that we sponsored together with the other non-aligned countries that are members of the Council.”
1995-05-17 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3538 (1995) · source
“In our View, there cannot be a successful conclusion of the Middle East peace process without a resolution of the question of Jerusalem. We believe that its status must be discussed in the context of the peace process and of a comprehensive settlement in the region. Any confidence- destroying measures, such as the present illegal policy of the Government of Israel, must immediately be discontinued. It is therefore evident that the international community cannot remain passive vis-a-vis these measures taken by Israel, which will continue to imperil the peace process. In this context, it is indispensable for the Security Council to reverse this situation by taking appropriate measures without delay. Failure to do so is bound to send the wrong message to Israel.”
1995-05-17 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3538 (1995) · source
“Nevertheless, we would simply like to reiterate that the recent Israeli expropriation order concerning 53 hectares of land in East Jerusalem is not only in violation of relevant United Nations resolutions and of international law, but also poses a serious threat to the Middle East peace process as a whole, as it contravenes the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements, signed on 13 September 1993 by the Government of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization. It is our considered View that any expropriations of Arab lands undertaken by Israel are null and void, and we therefore call upon Israel to immediately rescind these activities, be they in East Jerusalem or other occupied territories, which are in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949.”
1995-05-17 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3538 (1995) · source
“The Indonesian delegation has made its positions very clear concerning the issue of settlements in the Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, the most recent being the position it expressed during the formal open debate last Friday. That being the case, my delegation will not take up too much of the Council's time by expressing its already well-known positions.”
1995-05-17 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3538 (1995) · source
“Therefore, we urge all parties to continue their efforts to consolidate the peace process and to refrain from any action incompatible with the requirements of the agreed upon accords.”
1995-05-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3536 (1995) · source
“In this context, we would like to reiterate that it is the responsibility of the international community, and specifically of the Security Council, to take the necessary steps to put an end to these violations and to repudiate the Israeli confiscation orders, thus preventing any action which could jeopardize the negotiations on a final settlement of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. My delegation therefore calls upon the Government of Israel immediately to revoke its confiscation orders and arrangements affecting Palestinian land in the city of Jerusalem and to commence the effective dismantling of the Israeli settlements in all the occupied Palestinian territories, including Jerusalem. This is indispensable to sustain the positive achievements of the past.”
1995-05-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3536 (1995) · source
“We are deeply concerned by the present activities, which represent the first substantial land seizure since that promise was made. In this regard, while we note some encouraging developments which have taken place in the search for a peaceful settlement to the question of Palestine in the context of a comprehensive Middle East peace process, my delegation cannot refrain from emphasizing once again that the issue of settlements in the occupied territories has a profound bearing on the peace process.”
1995-05-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3536 (1995) · source
“My delegation therefore strongly condemns this decision by Israel, which is clearly in flagrant violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, United Nations resolutions declaring the settlements illegal and other relevant Security Council resolutions, as well as of the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements signed on 13 September 1993 by the Government of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization. Moreover, it is also in contradiction to the norms of international conduct, the United Nations Charter and the precepts and principles of international law. Contrary to what the Government of Israel promised in 1993 - that the future of Jerusalem would be negotiated with the Palestinian leaders - we are witnessing actions on the part of Israel which are far from this.”
1995-05-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3536 (1995) · source
“It is against this backdrop that my delegation wishes to stress the need for the Security Council to undertake a thorough consideration of the matter and to take urgent actions on it. In our view, the decision of the Government of Israel to confiscate Palestinian land in the city of Jerusalem and the establishment of settlements on those lands pose great dangers and may well jeopardize the whole Middle East peace process. Such untenable policies and practices by the Israeli Government could very well induce the utilization of drastic measures by certain groups, which would further exacerbate the already tense situation.”
1995-05-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3536 (1995) · source
“It was just three months ago, in February, that the Council was convened to discuss the same issue we are now addressing, namely, that of settlements in the territories occupied by Israel since 1967. It was precisely because of the lack of progress in this regard that my delegation strongly supported the request for this meeting of the Security Council, as called for by the League of Arab States, the Islamic Group and the Arab Group in response to the latest decision by the Israeli Government to confiscate 53 hectares of Palestinian land situated in the area of East Jerusalem and its announcement that the land is to be allocated for the purpose of continuing to build Israeli settlements.”
1995-05-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3536 (1995) · source
“Indonesia's contribution to UNOMIG, albeit modest, is a reflection of our commitment to assist in the international community's effort to find a political settlement to the situation in Abkhazia, Georgia. We too share the Secretary-General's observation that an untimely withdrawal of UN OMIG would lead to open confrontation and the resumption of conflict. In the light of these considerations, we are in full support of the extension of UNOMIG's mandate, and we shall therefore vote in favour of the draft resolution.”
1995-05-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3535 (1995) · source
“We welcome the recent initiative of the Russian Federation in drafting a text which seeks to develop in greater detail the elements of a federal solution that could provide the basis for a comprehensive political settlement. The cooperation of all the parties in this effort is indeed essential. Genuine negotiations always require a spirit of conciliation, mutual concessions and a commensurate political will to achieve a peaceful and just solution. In this regard, the Indonesian delegation would like to reiterate its strong support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic of Georgia within its internationally recognized borders. It further reiterates its deep concern about the renewed hostilities and, therefore, encourages the efforts of the United Nations, the OSCE and the Russian Federation.”
1995-05-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3535 (1995) · source
“It would indeed be difficult to overemphasize the valuable role of the UNHCR in alleviating the plight of refugees and internally displaced persons. It is therefore with a deep sense of concern that my delegation notes the financial difficulties that are currently being faced by the UNHCR, thereby threatening the continuation of its valuable presence in Georgia. However, without in any way minimizing the plight of the refugees and displaced persons, it is worth noting that the humanitarian situation is merely a symptom of a more fundamental problem - that of the impasse in the political negotiations. We are concerned, for example, that the Secretary-General has reported that there was a renewed escalation of violence, in mid-March and early in April, in the Gali region, thereby impeding the convening of further rounds of negotiations.”
1995-05-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3535 (1995) · source
“We note the continued lack of a secure environment, particularly in the Gali region, and the observation contained in the Secretary- General's report about the failure of the Government of Georgia, as well as of the Abkhaz authorities, to guarantee the safety of the displaced persons and repatriants as agreed upon in the Quadripartite Agreement on the voluntary return of refugees and displaced persons of 4 April 1994. It is of the utmost importance to come to an acceptable arrangement on this matter, and we urge the parties to abide by the principles of international humanitarian law. In addition, we deem it imperative that the Abkhaz side significantly accelerate the process of the return of refugees and displaced persons, in accordance with the proposals of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).”
1995-05-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3535 (1995) · source
“In this regard, it would be remiss of me if I were to fail to commend the achievements of UNOMIG and the peace-keeping force of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) in preventing a further escalation of violence. Furthermore, we recognize the valuable contribution of the United Nations and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, as well as of the Russian Federation in its capacity as facilitator, to the search for a peaceful political settlement through negotiations between the conflicting parties in Georgia. My delegation is none the less fully cognizant of the fact that challenges still abound. We share the concern felt by the international community regarding the frustratingly slow progress in resolving the issue of refugees and displaced persons.”
1995-05-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3535 (1995) · source
“In this regard, we have come to learn that apparent breakthroughs in the political negotiations have, not infrequently, been followed by developments that have the effect of negating the apparent initial gains. Consequently, progress in the political negotiations has at best been mixed. However, this is certainly not due to a lack of effort on the part of the international community. The United Nations, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the Russian Federation have all been untiring in their combined efforts to find a comprehensive settlement, despite the often less than exemplary cooperation of the parties concerned. Indeed, these combined international and regional efforts are a true reflection of the call contained in the Charter for cooperation between our Organization and regional arrangements.”
1995-05-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3535 (1995) · source
“At the outset, I should like to extend my delegation's congratulations to you, Sir, on your assumption of the presidency of the Security Council for this month. I should like also to express my delegation's deep appreciation to Ambassador Kovanda for the excellent manner in which he guided the Council last month. Further, allow me to express my delegation's gratitude to those who formulated the draft resolution before us concerning the extension of the mandate of the United Nations Observer Mission in Georgia (UNOMIG). I wish to take this opportunity also to welcome in our midst Mr. Chikvaidze, the Foreign Minister of Georgia. My delegation has closely followed the situation in Abkhazia, Georgia.”
1995-05-12 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3535 (1995) · source
“Also, we emphasize the importance of the principle of the unacceptability of any attempt to resolve the conflict by military means, which principle is reflected in the draft resolution, and the draft resolution's emphasis on reaching a peaceful settlement. In this regard, we urge all parties not only to comply fully with the cease-fire and cessation-of- hostilities agreements, but also to show the political will necessary for the attainment of these objectives on the basis of acceptance of the Contact Group peace plan, which has been accepted by the Government of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. My delegation still believes that a political settlement through negotiations is indeed imperative in order to re- establish comprehensive and permanent peace and security in that country and in the region as a whole.”
1995-04-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3521 (1995) · source
“With the resolution before us today, the Council re- emphasizes its strong condemnation of the intentional targeting of UNPROFOR. The international community cannot accept any attacks of this nature on members of United Nations peace-keeping forces, and the status of United Nations personnel must be respected in all circumstances by all parties. In this context, we underline the call on the Secretary- General to submit a proposal on measures to prevent future attacks. My delegation attaches great urgency to addressing this matter without delay, and we should like to re- emphasize the responsibility of the parties concerned to provide for the security and safety of all United Nations personnel.”
1995-04-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3521 (1995) · source
“Indonesia not only urges the parties to adhere to the current agreements, but would also like to encourage them to work towards their possible extension. In particular, my delegation would like to express its grave concern about the recent attacks on personnel of the United Nations Protection Force (UNPROFOR), and urges all parties to refrain from any similar action. Only a few days ago, the President of the Security Council issued a statement denouncing such acts, specifically, the deliberate targeting and shooting to death of a French soldier by an unidentified sniper in Sarajevo, continuing the recent killing of United Nations soldiers in similar circumstances. In fact, soon after the adoption of the Presidential statement, we learned of a repetition of this cowardly act which took the life of another French soldier.”
1995-04-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3521 (1995) · source
“At the outset, my delegation would like to express its deep condolences for the recent terrible loss of the two French soldiers in Bosnia and Herzegovina. My delegation would also like to express its appreciation to the French delegation for its endeavours in initiating the draft resolution now before us expressing the Council's concern regarding the recent developments in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Indonesian delegation is deeply concerned by the continuing fighting in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, in violation of the agreements of 23 and 31 December 1994 on a cease-fire and the complete cessation of hostilities, reflecting an overall deterioration in the situation in that country. The cessation of hostilities is indispensable if political dialogue is to have any prospect of success.”
1995-04-19 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3521 (1995) · source
“It is in this spirit, and with the reservations I have expressed, that my delegation will vote in favour of the draft resolution.”
1995-04-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3519 (1995) · source
“In order for the draft resolution to achieve the desired result and become an effective tool to rectify the situation, it is imperative not only to properly address the concerns of the issue at hand but also to maintain strict adherence to the basic principles governing relations between sovereign States. Indonesia is of the View that it is a meaningless exercise to adopt resolutions that are not implementable. However good the intentions are, if the fundamental principles are not respected, such measures may not adequately address the matter. My delegation firmly believes that the humanitarian situation in Iraq should be dealt with in a comprehensive manner, that humanitarian considerations should prevail and that the focus of our efforts should be directed towards ensuring that the requirements for the population are met.”
1995-04-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3519 (1995) · source
“My delegation would also like to express its reservations regarding paragraph 8 (b), describing Iraq's obligation to complement the distribution of humanitarian relief and to provide an amount exceeding 10 per cent of its oil production revenue. Within the context of the principles of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of States, it would be more appropriate not to mention a specific amount to be allocated for the three northern Governorates within Iraq. This, in our view, would constitute an infringement on the principle of non- interference in the internal affairs of sovereign States, as it would provide encouragement to separatist movements in the northern part of Iraq.”
1995-04-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3519 (1995) · source
“In this regard, my delegation would like to draw attention to paragraph 6, which still insists that "the larger share of the petroleum and petroleum products" should be shipped Via the Kirkuk-Yumurtalik pipeline. It is our view that the volume of petroleum shipped through this pipeline, the property of Iraq and Turkey, should be considered a matter of paramount concern. We must respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Iraq, and Iraq should therefore be able to decide on the use of its pipelines for transportation and production purposes. Furthermore, we believe that the application of Chapter VII of the Charter should be specifically addressed to peace and security in the region, and should not be applied so as to interfere in the internal affairs of Iraq.”
1995-04-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3519 (1995) · source
“We welcome the cooperation demonstrated by the sponsors of this draft resolution in accommodating several amendments addressing the concerns not only of Member States, but also of the Government of Iraq. My delegation regrets, however, that this draft resolution falls short of our expectations. We respect the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity, which are guaranteed under the Charter of the United Nations and which we all espouse. The Indonesian delegation would therefore like to emphasize that these fundamental principles of international law should be adhered to and respected by all Member States. Although we know that reference to these principles has indeed been incorporated into some of the paragraphs of the draft resolution, we note that its contents are not consistent with these principles.”
1995-04-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3519 (1995) · source
“Like others, Indonesia is deeply concerned over the worsening humanitarian situation in Iraq, as clearly reflected in the latest reports of the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), as well as in the recent report made by an official of the Emergency and Humanitarian Aid section of the Netherlands Ministry for Foreign Affairs who had visited central and southern Iraq. The situation in those areas can be described only as a humanitarian tragedy, with young children, in particular, suffering from the effects. Therefore, the needs are enormous, and aid is urgently required in order to ameliorate the situation and keep the number of victims of this tragedy as low as possible.”
1995-04-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3519 (1995) · source
“At the outset, my delegation would like to express its appreciation to the Argentine delegation and the other sponsors for their endeavours in initiating the draft resolution before us, aimed at addressing the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Iraq, which has created concern among the international community. From the beginning, Indonesia has always believed that producing resolutions on a humanitarian basis is imperative in order to be able to address effectively the human sufferings and misery largely affecting, women, children and the elderly, which have taken on dramatic proportions. We also believe that it is therefore indispensable that Iraq's concerns also be taken into account so that this humanitarian tragedy may be addressed adequately and effectively.”
1995-04-14 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3519 (1995) · source
“Such assurances, to be credible, must be reinforced by a firm commitment to non-use of nuclear weapons and renunciation of such strategic doctrines; this would offer an immediate and more satisfactory solution to the universal quest for security. We therefore believe that more far-reaching action will be needed to ensure the security of all nations. None the less, we recognize that the draft resolution constitutes an initial step towards a legally binding international instrument which should be broader in scope and multilaterally negotiated. It will only be useful if the nuclear-weapon States pursue this objective and ensure its ultimate consummation. Its successful outcome could further strengthen the non-proliferation regime and also constitute an important step in the broader process of nuclear disarmament.”
1995-04-11 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3514 (1995) · source
“Another lacuna in the draft resolution is the failure to include the Non- Aligned Movement's proposal that aggression with nuclear weapons or the threat of such aggression against a non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the NPT constitutes a threat to international peace and security and necessitates immediate measures on the part of the Council, in conformity with Article 39 of the Charter and consistent with the substance and spirit of the relevant Articles of Chapter VII. This failure has rendered actions and measures envisaged in the draft insignificant. It is against this backdrop that the non-aligned countries Parties to the NPT have doubts concerning the purported significance of security assurances in the form of a resolution by the Security Council, however solemnly proclaimed and well-intentioned.”
1995-04-11 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3514 (1995) · source
“It recognizes the legitimacy of the demand of the non- nuclear-weapon States for security assurances, and calls for appropriate measures to safeguard their security. And it contemplates the initiation of measures to counter aggression involving the use of nuclear weapons and seeks to render necessary assistance to victims of such aggression. We regret, however, that the draft has failed to acknowledge the right of the non-nuclear-weapon States to unconditional security assurances in an international convention. Furthermore, it remains to be asked how a veto-bound Council could conceivably stem aggression committed by a nuclear-weapon State and take appropriate measures against that State.”
1995-04-11 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3514 (1995) · source
“Yet, despite widespread support for an international convention for security guarantees, a consensus on a common formula or approach has continued to elude us due to the maintenance of established positions and the reiteration of existing unilateral assurances. It is in this context that Parties to the NPT that are members of the Non-Aligned Movement have considered the draft resolution now before us. We have noted with appreciation that it contains some of the proposals advanced by the Non-Aligned Movement caucus. It rightly reiterates the importance of the NPT to the global community and calls upon the States parties to comply fully with their obligations, in particular with Article VI.”
1995-04-11 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3514 (1995) · source
“For without such iron-clad guarantees, the non- aligned countries would remain under the threat of nuclear weapons, or suffer their actual use, and they are therefore committed to a common formulation incorporated into a legal instrument. Hence, it is deeply regrettable to note the lack of tangible progress in the Conference on Disarmament despite concerted efforts by the Group of 21 since 1979. It was the expectation of the non-aligned countries Parties to the NPT that the improved international political atmosphere and achievements in the field of disarmament, as well as greater military openness and transparency, had provided a qualitatively new environment for a fresh appraisal of this question.”
1995-04-11 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3514 (1995) · source
“The declarations of last week made by the nuclear- weapon States contain inherent weaknesses and deficiencies, as they are unilateral and non-binding. Because security can never be assured on the basis of hortatory declarations, and because of the threat that continues to be posed by the very presence of vast nuclear arsenals, the non-aligned countries regard security guarantees in a binding international convention without any loopholes as the legitimate right of all non-nuclear nations. In the context of an unacceptable balance of obligations and responsibilities as between the nuclear and non-nuclear countries, the NPT parties that have renounced the manufacture and acquisition of nuclear weapons have a legitimate right to unconditional and legally binding assurances.”
1995-04-11 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3514 (1995) · source
“These endeavours, in our View, reflect concerted and serious efforts by the nuclear- weapon States to assuage the concerns of the non-nuclear- weapon States to ensure their security. However, they do not meet the long-standing demand of the non-aligned countries for legally binding commitments to enhance their security. Such a demand is fully consistent with the Final Document adopted by the General Assembly at its first special session devoted to Disarmament, held in 1978, as well as with the resolutions adopted by the Assembly since 1979 which have emphasized the urgency of seeking an agreement for a binding international instrument to assure non-nuclear nations against the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons. This issue was also accorded priority in all four NPT Review Conferences.”
1995-04-11 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3514 (1995) · source
“It is a truism that there is no protection against the use of nuclear weapons, which can be triggered by technical malfunction, political misjudgment or by miscalculation. The consequences of their use cannot remain limited, and there is no way to contain them within predetermined national or even regional boundaries. In addition to the human cost, the ecology of the world would be severely affected and its infrastructures shattered. We are therefore encouraged that there are signs of a positive change in the approaches adopted by the nuclear- weapon States on this crucial issue at this crucial juncture. In this context, we welcome the individual declarations made by them last week as well as the draft resolution submitted by them now before us.”
1995-04-11 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3514 (1995) · source
“Nor do the unilateral pledges contained in the statements of 6 April 1995 by themselves create the necessary confidence that nuclear weapons will not be used: such declarations leave ample room for subjective interpretations. There is also the danger that, in certain circumstances, especially after the initiation of hostilities, such assurances may be unilaterally withdrawn. They therefore do not meet the security needs of non-nuclear-weapon States since they were not multilaterally negotiated, are unverifiable and conflict with each other. Above all, they do not offer legitimate, reasonable and binding assurances to meet the valid concerns of non-nuclear-weapon States. To the non-aligned countries, nuclear issues are of world-wide significance because of the global reach of nuclear weapons.”
1995-04-11 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3514 (1995) · source
“We have noted with appreciation the endeavours made by the nuclear-weapon States to meet the legitimate security concerns of the vast majority of non-nuclear-weapon States by submitting the draft resolution as well as by issuing separate statements. We believe that those statements contain some elements that deserve our careful consideration, especially on the eve of the convening of the NPT Review and Extension Conference. The non-aligned countries continue to believe that Security Council resolution 255 (1968) and the assurances of 1978 fall short of providing adequate security assurances and therefore need to be supplemented.”
1995-04-11 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3514 (1995) · source
“Allow me to begin by expressing my delegation's congratulations to you, Sir, upon your assumption of the presidency of the Council for this month. We are convinced that your diplomatic skill will guide the Council effectively. My delegation would also like to express its sincere appreciation to Ambassador Li Zhaoxing, the Permanent Representative of China, for the excellent manner and wisdom with which he presided over the work of the Council. It is a distinct honour and privilege for me to deliver this statement on behalf of the States parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) that are members of the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries.”
1995-04-11 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3514 (1995) · source
“On behalf of the caucus, I would also like to express our deep gratitude to the Ambassador of Croatia, the Ambassador of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Ambassador of The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia for their contribution to the caucus's work.”
1995-03-31 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3512 (1995) · source
“Furthermore, we would also like to express our appreciation for the role of the preventive deployment force in The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. The importance of the actions by UNPROFOR in this area, for which both the Government and the ethnic Albanian leaders have expressed their appreciation, should be underscored. We support the continuation of these positive efforts under the newly mandated United Nations Preventive Deployment Force (UNPREDEP). Let me conclude by expressing, on behalf of the Non-Aligned caucus, our sincere appreciation to the sponsors of the draft resolutions before us for their cooperation and constructive approach during the negotiations.”
1995-03-31 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3512 (1995) · source
“In this connection, my delegation wishes to emphasize the importance of the tenth preambular paragraph of the draft resolution contained in document S/ 1995/243, on the need for Member States to take appropriate steps to enhance the capacity of UNPROFOR in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina to execute its mandate as set out in the relevant resolutions of the Security Council. Undoubtedly, the political climate requires much improvement, and the international community is called upon to intensify its efforts to promote political progress. In this context, my delegation would particularly like to commend the efforts undertaken by the Contact Group. We encourage the international community to continue its support for these positive efforts in bringing about a peaceful settlement to the conflict.”
1995-03-31 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3512 (1995) · source
“With regard to the operations in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, we recognize UNPROFOR's past achievements and setbacks as well as the extreme difficulty it continues to face in attempting to stabilize the situation on the ground, a stabilization which is necessary if an atmosphere conducive to political negotiations is to be established. In the light of these recent developments, which have caused grave concern in the international community, all parties are called upon to cooperate with UNPROFOR. In this context, my delegation would also like to draw attention to the past discrepancies between UNPROFOR's mandate and its implementation, and would like to emphasize the importance of effective implementation.”
1995-03-31 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3512 (1995) · source
“Firstly, the importance of controlling the crossing of military personnel, equipment, supplies and weapons over the international borders between the Republic of Croatia and the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and between the Republic of Croatia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) cannot be overstated. Secondly, we would like to re-emphasize that the strength of the troops not only should be adequate for the implementation of the Operation's mandate, but, most important, should have a deterrent function. Lastly, facilitating the delivery of international humanitarian assistance to the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina through the territory of the Republic of Croatia is a crucial element of UNCRO's mandate in the Republic of Croatia.”
1995-03-31 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3512 (1995) · source
“However, we are also fully cognizant of the concern expressed by the Government of the Republic of Croatia regarding the lack of progress in the political dialogue, which contributes to the perception that the UNPROFOR presence has merely reinforced the status quo. The sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic of Croatia within its internationally recognized borders cannot be compromised. This must also remain a guiding principle for the United Nations presence in the Republic of Croatia and in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. In the context of the actual nature, size and function of the new United Nations operation in the Republic of Croatia - the United Nations Confidence Restoration Operation (UNCRO) - we would like to stress several points.”
1995-03-31 · UN Security Council · Security Council, S/PV.3512 (1995) · source