Zainul Abidin Rasheed
Singapore
“I think much has been done as far as recovery is concerned, and the Japanese government itself is now paying due attention to reconstruction. Just at the Jakarta meeting, in fact, there was a lot of sharing of what has been done, and while they are grateful, they also look forward to us working together in terms of the reconstruction.”
“Kelp that he had met Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew when Mr Lee visited Moscow in 1970. Even though then Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew at that time showed an interest to learn from the Soviet socialist system, he changed his mind after visiting the Soviet Union and made changes to the political system and the system of governance in Singapore…”
“In my opinion, the measures and programmes to achieve progress are quite visible and numerous. The Community Leaders’ Forum network continues to develop. What else should be given attention to, especially in relation to dysfunctional families and divorce cases?”
“I found the Malay workers in the Middle East very encouraging. This is one of the best opportunities for us in this new area. Finally, the three-prong Government measure is to ensure that every citizen will continue to contribute towards the development of Singapore to ensure that every Singaporean will be given the best opportunity to en…”
“Sir, I believe ASEAN's credibility does not just hinge on Myanmar. ASEAN's credibility has been built over the years and we have shown a lot of credibility in many areas in terms of international relations.”
“As the President has said, when we take advantage of the existing opportunities through globalisation, we must also pay attention to the fact that these new opportunities should not result in a wide income gap.”
The complete record
Every one of 455 lines we hold for Zainul Abidin Rasheed, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 3 of 10.
“Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction for Offences against Internationally Protected Persons Sir, a number of provisions in the Bill provide for extra-territorial jurisdiction in relation to certain offences against Internationally Protected Persons. Having this provision gives Singapore the ability and the flexibility to prosecute any offender found in our territory if he is not extradited. It will also ensure that the perpetrators do not escape punishment regardless of who they are and where the offence is committed, which is a key objective of this Convention. Sir, in particular, clause 4 of the Bill confers extra-territorial jurisdiction in relation to offences listed in the First Schedule which are committed against Internationally Protected Persons. Clause 5 confers extra-territorial jurisdiction for offences listed in the Second Schedule which are committed against the official premises of, or a vehicle used by, an Internationally Protected Person. Clause 7 confers extra-territorial jurisdiction for the abetment of a conspiracy, or an attempt to commit an offence against an Internationally Protected Person. Sir, clause 6 of the Bill makes it an offence, both within Singapore as well as outside, to threaten to commit an offence against an Internationally Protected Person, his official premises or place of residence or a vehicle used by him. Presumption of knowledge Persons who are charged for the offences specified in clauses 4 to 7 of this Bill will be presumed to know that the target of his actions was an Internationally Protected Person. The presumption is rebuttable and only applies after the prosecution shows that the victim had the status of an Internationally Protected Person. Such a provision in criminal legislation is not unprecedented.”
“The Bill also enables us to provide mutual legal assistance and extradition procedures in relation to persons who are accused of committing or aiding in the commission of offences against Internationally Protected Persons. Coupled with extra-territorial jurisdiction, this will ensure that offenders will not escape punishment simply because they committed such offences overseas. Sir, I will now touch on the key provisions of the Bill. Definition of Internationally Protected Person Under clause 3 of the Bill, the definition of the Internationally Protected Person follows that provided by Article 1 of the Convention. Under the Convention, an Internationally Protected Person could refer to two categories of persons. The first category of persons refers to Heads of State, Heads of Government and Ministers of Foreign Affairs as well as their family members. These persons are entitled to special protection as long as they are in a foreign country, regardless of whether their visit to the foreign country is official, unofficial or private. The second category refers to diplomatic officers, consular officers and officials of an international organisation, for example, the UN. It extends to the family members of this group of persons. Where there is doubt as to whether a particular person is an Internationally Protected Person, the Bill provides for the Minister for Foreign Affairs to give a written certificate stating whether a person was at any time an internationally protected person. This certificate is admissible as prima facie evidence in court proceedings to facilitate proof that the victim of an offence is indeed an Internationally Protected Person.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I beg to move, "That the Bill be now read a Second time." Introduction Sir, the war against terror is increasingly complex. Aided by sophisticated technology, terrorist groups are now able to extend their ideological reach and inflict harm beyond the immediate boundaries of countries or regions. In recognition of the globalised threat of terrorism, the international community has developed a series of 13 international counter-terrorism conventions within the framework of the United Nations to combat this threat. To date, Singapore has acceded to eight of them, the most recent being the International Convention on the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings in December 2007. Sir, one such instrument is the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes Against Internationally Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents. In a globalised world, it is imperative to protect officials of States and international organisations from being targeted by terrorists. This Convention focuses on such persons - called "Internationally Protected Persons", or IPP, and provides a framework for international cooperation in the investigation, prosecution and extradition of people who engage in offences against Internationally Protected Persons. The provisions of our Penal Code generally address our obligations under the Convention if such offences were to be committed domestically. However, for consistency with other Acts implementing other international counter-terrorism Conventions, this Bill extends Singapore's jurisdiction to deal with specific crimes against Internationally Protected Persons outside Singapore.”
“We are thankful that Singapore is a country that does not take lightly relations between civilisations and religion. Even though the Finance Minister said briefly that people have to work together to move Singapore forward, I hope that it is not only understood in the context of economic relations only. I want the Finance Minister to emphasise more clearly in his Budget Statement about the importance of promoting efforts and programmes that increase religious and racial relations. I urge the Government to see this secular country that is Singapore, as "Uniquely Singapore", in terms of religious relations too. As I said before, I see secularism in Singapore as "secularism with a soul", that is, a system that respects the role that can be played by religious life in Singapore. I hope the Finance Minister will not mind increasing the grant and budget for inter-religious activities that can bring about unity and resilience to our society and country. Through my visits and participation in inter-civilisation seminars and forums in London, Berlin and Paris last year, I learnt that Western and secular countries in Europe are ready to make use of programmes and their governments' budgets for the same reason. So we have to be more proactive to have a long-term inter-religious and inter-civilisation plan that is laid out properly, in order to strengthen our society’s resilience. *Cols. 917-920. 5.23 pm”
“This branding allows us to go further, to China, India, Southeast Asia, like Vietnam, and the Middle East, to look for new opportunities to spread our economic wings. As we share our skills and our experiences, we have to make sure that our competitive edge is maintained. In this context, I welcome the Finance Minister's announcement to give more help to schools, polytechnics and universities, especially in the form of scholarships and bursaries to students. With the Ministry of Education advocating the approach to "Teach Less, and Learn More", I suggest that the Government give a bigger grant to schools in order to accelerate this process. For example, the $1.5 billion grant that was announced for 100 schools the other day is not enough. Schools, up to university level, have to be more innovative and creative in their education system. Last Monday, I was invited as a Guest-of-Honour to the International Creativity Conference organised by the American Creative Association (ACA) and Singapore Management University. This is the first time the ACA organised this conference outside America, and Singapore was their choice. This proves that they look up to Singapore's creative efforts and we have to make sure that this high status that we have achieved, in terms of innovation and creativity, will be improved further by us. Creativity and innovation will determine future competition and economic growth for all countries. We cannot be left behind. Mr Deputy Speaker, our resilience cannot be measured through economic growth alone. Social resilience is important, especially after the September 11 incident. Inter-religious and racial relations cannot be taken for granted.”
“More can and need to be done to change people's mindsets towards self-reliance. (ii) The Public Assistance programme. While welcoming the increase from $290 to $330, I believe there is a need for Government to consider a range rather than a flat rate to meet the different needs or situations. The Public Assistance range should depend on the cost of living (eg, rents and utilities), as it is different if a PA recipient stays alone in a rented room or shares with another PA recipient in a rented room or is a free lodger. Also, medical costs for those who need to go for dialysis are a lot higher. Between providing assistance and changing people's mindsets about self-reliance lies our long-term approach towards managing the challenge of looking after our needy in Singapore. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is all part and parcel of building a resilient community. No matter how top a quality our economy is, Singapore's success and stability will also be measured by how we take care of our low income and needy. After all, the Minister for Finance has also emphasised in last year's and this year's Budget Statement too that no one should be left behind or left out. It is also about how we keep everyone 'in'. Being involved, being inclusive. On this note, Sir, allow me to continue in Bahasa. (In Malay): [For vernacular speech, please refer to Appendix A *.] Mr Deputy Speaker, as I support this 2008 Budget, allow me to touch on Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam’s summary about "Creating a Top Quality Economy and Building a Resilient Community". It is a noble vision and an aspiration that should be held by every Singaporean, and not only the Government. The miracle of Singapore's economic achievements is recognised and captures the world’s attention.”
“So there are quite a number of supplementary programmes that we put forth because we believe that while national programmes are growing, there are still cracks, there are needs which we know better at the ground level, at the district level, and we provide them to supplement the national programmes. And the latest of which we have also just introduced is a Matching Grant Programme with the grassroots organisations, CCC, in particular, to meet local needs called CPR. Do not panic. It is called CPR because it is short for Community and Provision Relief Fund. It can resuscitate, in some instances, but I think the idea is actually to provide more help at the grassroots level. There is much that could still be done to fine-tune and improve the assistance schemes, but allow me to suggest two today: (i) The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) could do more to provide financial and professional support to expand programmes like what we have at the North-East CDC called Talking Dollars and Sense Programme which MAS sponsors. Here, we do spend quite a bit of time inviting all those who are receiving financial assistance to bring even their family members to go through a programme; counselling and informational programme where we can teach them how to stretch their dollar. When you hear children from poor homes, for example, wanting to go to McDonalds, parents cannot afford that and instead they go for Ramli burger or Dollah burger at home, where you can actually make cheap burgers at home and I think it can be equally good. So, at North-East CDC, we have reached out to about 50% of those who are receiving assistance, where we teach them not only to stretch their dollar but also to change their mindset and how to be more self-reliant.”
“4 billion surplus and what would be his guiding principles for future reference to reassure Singaporeans that in fact it was a fair formula in meeting the concerns of Singaporeans when faced with rising cost of living and inflation, while planning and saving for the future. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, allow me at this juncture to welcome the additional top-up of $10 million for CCC's Comcare Fund, self-help groups and VWOs to support flexible assistance schemes to households that may need additional assistance. In the light of uncertainties and possible economic slowdown in the West and the growing inflationary fears, I would like to urge the Minister to monitor this fund closely in case more is needed later in the year ahead. I say this because even at this juncture, the national programmes need to be supplemented by local ones. We need to continue to monitor and identify the cracks existing in society to ensure that the social safety net we provide is effective and meaningful. Members may like to know that at the North East CDC, we have introduced a number of local schemes to support the National ComCare Fund and the CCC Flexi Fund. From the Neighbourhood Provision Assistance Scheme to the Neighbourhood Medical and Dental Assistance Scheme, Pre-School Subsidy to Northeast eyeWear Scheme (NEWS) to the Dedicated Northeast Ambulance (DNA) Services, North East Healthcare on the Move (HOME) Plus, North East Essential Relief (NEER) Scheme to programmes to change people's mindsets and to wise-up to money matters like "Talking Dollars and Sense" and "Sharing Hearts and Homes".”
“Sir, thank you for allowing me to speak in support of the motion in the name of the Minister for Finance. Singapore is now abuzz with talk and concern about inflation and cost of living woes. Headlines of 6.5% inflation rate for January will add to the worries. Although it is expected to moderate to 4.5% - 5.5% for the year, worries especially for the lower income will definitely linger. Yesterday's debate clearly reflects the growing concern and call for Government to do more. Equally clear is the concern that Singaporeans are always asking for more and also whether the hong bao mindset would create a mentality of wanting more every Budget. It reminds me of the film "Oliver". I am sorry I used the name "Oliver". I could have used "Ah Kow" or "Ahmad". But it will be felt by a lot of Singaporeans, not only the poor but also the lower middle-income group. The Minister for Finance's decision to spend $1.8 billion of the $6.4 billion surplus from last year is indeed generous. And despite that, there is still a call for more, especially for the low and the lower middle-income Singaporeans who feel the squeeze most. This is felt by many in the House, also among our grassroots leaders, I suppose partly because of the large surplus of $6.4 billion staring them in the face. What then, Sir, is the right balance? The answer might be somewhere in between the $1.8 billion and the larger surplus of $6.4 billion. I would like to ask the Minister to elaborate on what were his considerations in deciding the $1.8 billion as against the $6.”
“I think this question is best answered by MOF. But this is the position we have made clear from the very beginning - that we, as a financial centre, stand on our merits and our own credible position as a financial hub. And I do not think the signing of the ET will undermine that position. In fact, on the contrary, I feel it might strengthen our position. DEFENCE COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH INDONESIA (Benefits) 3. Ms Irene Ng Phek Hoong asked the Minister for Defence how the Defence Cooperation Agreement with Indonesia can improve the capability of the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) and boost ties between the Indonesian Armed Forces (TNI) and SAF.”
“To answer that question, there are others who are saying why it has taken so long. We started back in 2005. Many had, in fact, complained as though we were dragging our feet. In fact, when both Ministers and the chiefs of the armed forces met - after the officials had not been able to come to any agreement - they were able to iron out the differences and even come to a conclusion. I do not know whether it was a surprise, but I think it was timely. I do not think the sand and the granite issue which came just before that was the primary contribution towards the signing of the two agreements.”
“I think sacrifices or compromises are part of any negotiations and relations. In the case of Indonesia and Singapore, as I mentioned earlier, in fact, if we work on the basis of compromises and friendship, much can be achieved. But specifically in answer to her question about sand, they are separate matters and are not linked. As I recounted earlier, the decision to negotiate and conclude both the ET and DCA as a package was made much earlier in October 2005. The negotiations were already well advanced when land, sand and granite became an issue earlier this year. It was a distraction but not related to these talks. The Indonesians have repeatedly stated that there is no ban on granite sales. It is the prerogative of the Indonesian government to sell or not sell us sand so long as they comply with the WTO rules. As you all know, and it has been reported before, we have made alternative arrangements for our sand supplies.”
“As I have mentioned earlier, there was consensus and agreement between the two leaders of Indonesia and Singapore - Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and President Bambang Yudhoyono - that both will be taken together. So, we are looking forward that both will be ratified. There are some snags in terms of implementation issues, but we are waiting for the Indonesian side to conclude that, and we look forward to signing both together. Our understanding is that, in fact, both will have to be signed together and both will be made applicable at the same time. Er Lee Bee Wah (Ang Mo Kio): Sir, I would like to ask the Senior Minister of State: since it was signed two months after the sand ban, did we sign it because we were under the pressure of the sand ban? My next question is: what has we sacrificed or compromised in reaching this agreement?”
“Similarly, we would like to enhance the enduring defence ties between the SAF and the Indonesian Armed Forces (or TNI) and strengthen the professional bonds and interoperability of the two militaries through the DCA. When these agreements come into force, relations between Singapore and Indonesia will enter a new phase. But this does not mean that there will be no more bilateral issues. Indeed, signing an ET has removed a bone of contention in bilateral relations but it may also create other problems. For example, there are legal procedures and judicial processes which have to be followed when an extradition request is made. Indonesia's police and judicial processes will be subject to review by our judges and vice versa. It is therefore important that both sides understand this and allow the due process of law in each country to take its course. Mr Speaker, Sir, it is natural that differences in bilateral relations will arise from time to time between close neighbours. We can resolve them together, as long as we take the right perspective against the overall relationship. This should also not stop us from finding ways to resolve these differences or explore new areas of cooperation on a "win-win" basis. The ET and DCA are good examples of how our countries were able to tackle difficult issues and find mutually beneficial solutions. I am therefore confident that Singapore-Indonesia relations will continue to mature and deepen.”
“Yes. Sir, the signing of the Extradition Treaty (ET) and the Defence Cooperation Agreement (DCA) last month was in line with the decision taken by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono in October 2005 to negotiate both the ET and DCA in parallel and conclude them as a package. Since October 2005, there were several rounds of negotiations on the ET and DCA. Officials on both sides worked hard and made progress. Given that both agreements involve many complex issues, significant give-and-take was required on both sides. On 23rd April 2007, the Foreign and Defence Ministers, as well as armed forces chiefs, from both sides met to discuss the outstanding issues in Singapore. In a spirit of compromise and friendship, both sides sorted out their differing positions vis-a-vis the various issues and reached agreement on the ET and DCA as a political package. This means that the two signed Agreements contained a carefully negotiated balance of benefits. These agreements are good for both countries. Now that they have been signed, the next step is for both agreements to be ratified by Singapore and Indonesia through our own procedures. As they are a package, we have agreed that they should come into force together. Sir, Indonesia, as we all know, is a close neighbour. Our relations are extensive and broad-based. It is therefore in our interest to find opportunities to work with them where we can. The ET and DCA will help lay a strong foundation for further cooperation in the future. The ET will strengthen our cooperation with Indonesia in tackling crime and other offences, including acts of terrorism, in accordance with the domestic laws of each country.”
“Whether it is race relations, whether it is income divide, I think we need to be prepared to look at all possible angles as to how we can actually bring about the kind of solutions to our problems, so that we can be creative and really effective. I know I grew up in the days of IBM and if I may share with you another joke, this time in the Middle East, that goes... IBM stands for I nsyaallah, B ukhra and M aalish. In Arabic, Insyaallah means God willing. Even Muslims are now saying, no more just God willing, but put in the effort. But even the Arabs are now no more IBM, no more just Insyaallah, no more just God willing, neither can wait till tomorrow or so be it. Today, of course, it is no more just the IBM, but we have more players like Microsoft, Google, also HP. I think we should move on, be creative, be ready to turn our world on our own head and look at all possible angles and make our Singaporeans Happy People, Harmonious People, and Happening People. ADJOURNMENT OF DEBATE”
“Just as we Muslim leaders in Singapore try hard to moderate Muslim sentiments and feelings when their feelings are hurt, try to understand Muslim sensitivities. Some of you might have heard of this joke in our neighbouring country about Da Vinci Code. In fact, somebody asked me if, for example, that film was about Prophet Muhammad or about Muslim prophets, how would the Muslims react? The Christians have reacted quite coolly, quite non-emotionally, but how would the Muslims react? Would they burn cinemas? I do not know. But I am raising this in the context of a joke which actually was circulating in our neighbouring country. Da Vinci Code, transliterated into Malay means "Dah Benci Kot" or "Do you hate us?" I hope non-Muslims have not come to that stage where they "dah benci kot" with Muslims. Instead, I would appeal for more Singaporeans to work with our IRCCs in promoting racial harmony in Singapore. I, therefore, commend the efforts made by the Minister for MCYS in strengthening our IRCCs and, I hope, all our grassroots leaders and Singaporeans will work hand in hand with the IRCCs to promote better understanding and bring about racial harmony in Singapore. Sir, in view of time, let me just end by showing an advertisement which I saw in the Straits Times and which I really like: "i.t.". This is not about IT, it is not about digital divide, but it is about an advertisement. [Mr Zainul showed a copy of the advertisement. ] You do not have to turn your head, neither do you have to turn your box - but think out of the box! It is basically a very creative advertisement by HP to say how, in fact, we need to turn our world on its head when it comes to meeting challenges.”
“But like in the case of Stephen Lee, and so many others who have raised this matter to me, they come from Singaporeans who have done well from the Singapore system, including Members of Parliament here. Even my North East and Eunos residents who do not need social help or financial assistance have shown concern as to how the CDC takes care of the needy. Another friend who also shared with me this week this concern is Dr R Thevendran, secretary of the MDIS, referring to me the article written by a journalist, Mr Seah Chiang Nee. I am very reassured that these people not only talk about it but are, in fact, themselves involved in the "many hands approach" in our society. Sir, another area of concern, to me, is race relations. This is not new for me. I think you know that I have been talking about it many times in this House. While we have shown how we can live harmoniously in this multi-cultural and multi-religious society of ours, we cannot take it for granted. I know it sounds cliche-ist, but I am sure you will realise it will be repeated and repeated in this House and outside, because it bears repeating as it is important. But look at how issue after issue have cropped up around us in the region and in the world, especially in the context of race and inter-religious and inter-civilisational relations, and it worries me. We know Muslims in Singapore have reacted non-emotionally to the many issues like the Danish cartoons, Mozart play, the Pope's remarks and lately, the veiled issue raised by Mr Jack Straw - I am not saying that is the last straw - I would like to appeal to all not to take Muslims' feelings and sensitivities for granted.”
“Members that we need to devote more time and resources to understanding the real needs of our needy. While wanting to ensure that we avoid the welfarism trap, we would want to be effective in helping them. I empathise with Mayor Amy Khor's call for an Inter-Ministerial Committee. In fact, perhaps to show that we really mean to help the needy and minimise whatever ills that might crop up from the income divide and dangers that might be created, I think perhaps a Joint Ministerial Committee could be placed under the Prime Minister's Office to give impact and substance. Bearing in mind that Minister Vivian Balakrishnan had said that he is not a veterinarian, perhaps Minister for MCYS, being an eye specialist, would focus his lenses on the kind of programmes we have and what more needs doing to ensure that the social saviour net we have will minimise the gaps we talk about, including "in the gap" problem. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, what is reassuring for me is that the concern about the income divide is felt by Singaporeans who have made good. These are not calls actually coming just from the ground, but people who have done well, people who are concerned for the community, and that is very reassuring indeed. Last Wednesday morning before the start of the debate, I asked my good friend, Mr Stephen Lee, Chairman of SIA - he calls me his "Malay Brother", and I appreciate that - if there is one concern in his mind, what would it be. And unhesitatingly, he said, "income divide". For someone like Stephen Lee to feel that way, I think the problem is serious enough for us to think further and deeper how we should tackle it.”
“But after hearing Minister Vivian Balakrishnan earlier today, my job now is made easier and also time is not on our side today, being the last speaker. I know many Members still feel that there are still gaps that need to be filled and more could be done to help the needy. I agree, so did Minister for MCYS. But we also need to have our perspectives right, as far as the CDCs are concerned. I started off as a Chairman of the Ang Mo Kio-Cheng San CDC and later on as a Mayor of the North East CDC for the third term now, and I know what it means to change gear and do more for the needy. I came in basically to do bonding through social programmes. CDC was basically a mechanism for bonding and social cohesion. But lo and behold, because of the financial crisis and we hear SM Goh crying out loud "jobs, jobs, jobs", we had to change gear immediately. Almost overnight, we changed strategies and focus to be more hands-on helping the needy - more social assistance and more programmes to help those out of job. Thanks to MCYS, MOM and WDA, we are given lots more resources to battle the new frontiers for the CDCs. But as someone said, it is always we want more, more and more. From financial assistance, we go into changing mindsets, and that is not easy. We moved from becoming mere administrators of social and job assistance, we became counsellors. But social work counsellors do not grow on trees. We therefore have to tackle the challenges step by step, and we are making good progress. We have made tremendous progress, especially with more of our resources focused on care and working with and through the grassroots, as called on by the Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister Wong Kan Seng. But having said that, I agree with many hon.”
“Allow me, Sir, to draw an example which I think could address this concern well. Last week when I was in Dubai, our Consul Mr Dileep Nair organised a Hari Raya-Deepavali party for me to meet Singaporeans there. More than 100 attended. What used to be perhaps about 50 a few years back, now the Singaporean population in Dubai has grown to about 600. They have also established a Dubai-Singapore Business Council. The founding Chairman of the Council, Mr Noor Imambek, to me, is a fine example of someone who has benefited from globalisation. From a humble background of a clearing clerk with the First Chicago Bank in Singapore years ago, he was talent-scouted as a banking specialist in Bahrain, before rising to be the General Manager of the Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank. From what I gather, he was even asked by a conference organiser to introduce Minister Mentor when MM visits Abu Dhabi at the end of this month. That is how far he has gone from that very simple and modest beginning. What is reassuring is that, having benefited from those experiences and the opportunities of globalisation, Noor remembers to help others. Not only did he establish the Council in Dubai, but he is also helping Minister Dr Yaacob Ibrahim with the latter's initiative to get Singaporeans in Dubai to network and help Singaporeans here who are looking for jobs and opportunities in the Middle East, in Dubai in particular. While this might not exactly amount to the better offs helping the needy, but it suffices as an example of Singaporeans reaching out with the many hands to help others. Sir, I had originally wanted to touch on how we are faring in helping the needy, particularly from the CDCs' experience and what more needs to be done.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, while all eyes would be on maiden speeches, the previous speaker included - indeed, we are all ears for our new stars - allow me, a third term pre-65 MP, to share with the House two matters of concern that will require some hard thinking, indeed a touch of the heart too. Like what the Minister for Community Development, Youth and Sports said earlier, we need all hearts, hands and heads on board to bear. Whether to send the sacred cow to the veterinarian, or beware of losing the milk of human kindness, we all need to take our sacred fundamentals that make Singapore what it is today seriously, lest we go down the slippery slope. Having said that, let us also understand that we are not perfect. We have many strengths, but we do have many gaps here and there that need refining and improving. There are many challenges to overcome. There are also many challenges to benefit from. One which clearly we can benefit from is globalisation. Our President is spot on when he mentioned about the need for Singaporeans to optimise the fruits of globalisation. There is much to be gained from globalisation and much more are awaiting to be reaped. I have been very privileged indeed to get a first-hand feel of such opportunities while doing my work at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, travelling to the Middle East in particular. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am also very happy that the President, while talking about globalisation, also reminded Singaporeans to ensure that we remain an inclusive society. No one should be left behind, the President cautioned. I fully agree. This surely reminds us how the cream of globalisation could also bring about greater income divide, an issue which had drawn many Members to touch on during this debate.”
“Sir, I could not help but hearing hon. Member Sylvia Lim asking about freedom of expression, where she said we should encourage Singaporeans to also make jokes about the Government. I wonder whether she will also agree that, in encouraging freedom of expression, she should also encourage Singaporeans to make jokes about the Opposition - the Workers' Party. 3.05 pm”
“So, how is MUIS, which is a member of Menteri Agama Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore (MARBIMS), or the Ministerial Council for Religious Cooperation in this part of the world, working with MARBIMS, and what else is being done locally to promote inter-religious dialogue? How is Singapore being developed as a venue for such dialogue? Back on the subject of IRO, I attended this gathering at the Kallang Theatre last Saturday where IRO inducted the latest organisation. The Jains are now a member of IRO, which is now constituted of 10 members. Each time I see all the nine or 10 religious leaders attending functions, doing prayers to pray for Singapore and for racial harmony in Singapore, it really gives me a very comforting feeling, that we in Singapore too has a lot to contribute. On that note, Sir, I would like to ask the Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs to share with us the programmes and the vision for inter-ethnic and inter-religious dialogue in Singapore as a venue for the world. Muslim Community”
“Who were to blame - the Muslims, non-Muslims or circumstances? Or was it the media? Was it Islam or the Islam that was taught by some? I think these are questions which are again bugging our minds, even till today. I know, for example, that Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura, ie, the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore, has not only been active but pro-active in encouraging inter-ethnic and inter-religious dialogue. I would like to ask the Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs: what is in store, in terms of activities that we are doing and intend to do, and how are we resorting to our experiences in Southeast Asia? We, in this region, serve as a very good model. We have different shades and mixes of Muslims and non-Muslims in various countries in this part of the world. We have, in Singapore, a significant minority of Muslims making up 15% in a majority Chinese, Buddhist/Taoist, non-Muslim society. In Malaysia, it is about 55% Muslims in a mix of non-Muslims, eg, Christians, Buddhist and Hindus. Indonesia, the largest Muslim country, has a very rich tradition of Hinduism and Buddhism, and the spirit of Pancasila. In Thailand, a small Muslim minority with a very large Buddhist majority. And, in the Philippines, a small Muslim minority, with a large Catholic majority. Indonesia is, of course, the largest Muslim country in the world. So they all come with very rich experiences. I forgot about Brunei. Brunei is quite unique. They call themselves "MIB" - not "Men In Black" - but "Muslim, Islam, Beraja", or "Malay, Islam and Royalty". They all come with their own experiences, and I think there is a lot to share, not only among ourselves as a region, but for the whole world.”
“Bombs continue to test, if not shake, the foundations of inter-faith dialogue and understanding. The last was in India, where more than 20, mostly the innocents, were killed. That was but a part of the trail of destruction left by the mad, if not moronic, minds. Mr Chairman, Sir, apparently, some unthinking minds have found new ways to disrupt whatever progress Muslims and non-Muslims have made in bridging understanding. After 9/11, there has been a flurry of activities where there was a need for better understanding. It reminds me of the situation of this film "Jaws". When people thought that the beach was safe to go out, suddenly, the "Jaws" struck again. Now, we have cartoons. Some jokers have resorted to cartoons that are not only not funny, but reflect the kind of warped minds some have, no matter how tempting freedom of speech or expression seems to be a cause. I do not intend to open a debate on the disrespectful cartoons. Enough has already been said by both sides of the canvas. More than enough, in fact, has been said about the very respected Prophet that makes this cartoonist and those who reproduce them a mockery or caricature of life. I would like to remind ourselves that, in fact, in Singapore, we serve as a good example of the kind of dialogue that exists and that can continue to enhance inter-racial understanding. The Inter-Religious Organisation (IRO) is a very good example. Back in 1949, more than 55 years ago, a very well-known Muslim sufi, a missionary worker by the name of Maulana Abdul Aleem Bin Siddique, established the IRO. But, unfortunately, about 20 months later, in 1950, the episode of Maria Hertogh erupted, where almost 20 people were killed and more than a hundred were injured. What went wrong? What lessons hold?”
“Sir, since the Northeast CDC's name was invoked, may I have a chance to clarify? First of all, I would like to thank hon. Member, Ms Irene Ng, for empathising with the heavy responsibilities of CDCs. Second, I also empathise with the proposal that we should have a more focused approach to older workers. But I would just like to add on to say that all our job fairs cater to all age groups, even our job preparation exercise and walk-in interviews too. This Saturday, in fact, we are having a special training and employment opportunity for mature workers, where all the people in our databank, seeking for jobs, will be invited to attend. Some are more employable than others, some have better mindsets than others. Just as there are choosy older workers, there are also choosy employers. But as mindsets change, our records have indeed been improving.”
“I think there are ways and means of measuring whether we are effective or not in terms of our cultural relations and cultural diplomacy. It is not just the number of agreements we sign. When you look at MFA, you realise that we are very short of people. We have enough difficulties in getting Singaporeans to represent us as Ambassadors, and that is why we have had to rely on Non-Resident Ambassadors. And what more if we appointed cultural attaches, like the big countries do? Nevertheless, we are active in various forms of cultural activities, as in the examples I have given just now. You can see from the kinds of things that we do, the numbers will grow, the activities will grow, and the reach-out will also improve. We feel that cultural diplomacy is indeed an important part of our cultural relations.”
“As a small country with no economic hinterland, our survival depends on us being able to remain relevant to the world. Our foreign policy is designed to support this approach. Singapore is now a key transport and logistics hub with efficient road networks, seaport and airport, as well as extensive air and sea links. We are a political hub by virtue of being part of Southeast Asia that forms the core of key regional architectures comprising APEC, ASEAN+3, ARF and EAS, and which is linked to other regions through ASEM, FEALAC and AMED. You have earlier heard Minister George Yeo say that the region is at a political crossroads between two great civilisations, ie, China and India. We are developing links with these countries because that is the way we want to encourage their presence in the region, just as with the US. Economically, Singapore and the region are also actively developing ties with other countries and regions through FTAs and OSAs. Singapore's role as a multi-dimensional global venue, or hub, will further contribute towards the region's engagement with major global players.”
“On the Prophet caricature issue, I think we all realise that religion plays an important part of living culture, so inter-faith dialogue is also important to our role. The Prophet caricature issue has reminded us how sensitive religious divisions can be. The Internet had quickly propagated what started as an issue in Europe to Southeast Asia as well. Both President Yudhoyono and Prime Minister Badawi had to talk about it because their Muslim grounds had been aroused. In ASEAN, we must not allow similar misunderstandings between Muslims and non-Muslims to surface, worse, to divide us. It is therefore in everyone's interest to have frequent, open and constructive dialogues involving key stakeholders, to address concerns and misperceptions. This will help to defuse potential conflict amongst the different religions. Singapore can play its part in promoting such inter-faith dialogue. Earlier this year, the first Arab-Muslim Israeli Ambassador visited Singapore. We would receive Cardinal Renato Raffaele Martino for the 25th Anniversary of Singapore-Holy See relations in June this year. These are occasions where inter-faith dialogues could be organised. It is educational for us, and we could benefit from the experience and wisdom of these personalities. At the same time, we can contribute and share with them our own experiences. These could be small but first steps towards eventually having a wider-based inter-faith dialogue forum in Singapore, a venue where different faiths could come together in open and constructive dialogue. I would also like to add that this concept of an inter-faith dialogue venue relates back to the fundamentals of Singapore's existence.”
“Members would like to note too that many of MFA's visiting delegations were also hosted to exhibitions, performances and exposed to our local culture. During AMED last June, we took the opportunity to introduce our Middle East and other Asian guests to our prized local dishes like laksa, satay and chicken rice, and also embraced them in song and dance at the Malay Heritage Centre, complete with Yemeni-Arab music, which they greatly appreciated. Recently, a Chinese delegation was hosted to the "Nutcracker" put up by the Singapore Dance Theatre at the Esplanade. And during my visit to Indonesia last December, I was also able to establish links with South Sulawesi for cooperation between the Malay Heritage Centre and the Bugis connections in Makassar. Where appropriate, we also showcase exhibitions by our local artists at our Singapore Art Museum, and/or the exhibitions at the Asian Civilisation Museum and our cultural heritage centres. Active cultural diplomacy efforts by MFA are indeed on-going. According to MICA, which leads our international cultural cooperation efforts, seven G-G Cultural Agreements and six Agency-Agency Cultural Agreements have also been signed with countries such as China, India, South Korea, Jordan, Germany and Ireland over the past five years. Our agencies, and through them our arts groups and companies, are encouraged to pursue whatever arrangement necessary to achieve our goals of internationalising our arts. MFA will continue to assist our agencies in pursuing international cultural exchanges and in bringing Singapore culture to a wider international audience. In a wider context, I would also like to raise this question of inter-faith dialogue.”
“Through sharing our arts, heritage and culture, cultural diplomacy allows Singaporeans to make friends and create more space for our political and economic interests. MFA has been involved in many cultural diplomacy programmes. A notable one last year was "Singapore Season" in London. Our mission in London had supported MICA and the National Arts Council in the project, which presented Singapore in an integrated manner, leveraging our local films, food, design and flagship arts companies like the Singapore Dance Theatre and Singapore Chinese Orchestra. A business conference and a networking dinner were also held to engage European opinion makers. On its own, MFA has also initiated smaller scale cultural diplomacy initiatives. Last October, our mission in Moscow initiated the World Premier of Vladimir Martynov's Symphony-Cantata called “Singapore�?. It was well-attended and received good coverage from the Russian media. Washington Mission also organised a "Singapore Encore" in May 2005, together with SIF (Singapore International Foundation), featuring the Singapore Chinese Orchestra, the Nuradee Brothers, and the jazz singer Robert Fernandez. Mission used the occasion to invite contacts from the Administration, Congress, business and media circles for an evening of fun and good food. Just last month, Washington Mission also assisted the Asia Society in Houston, Texas, to host the Annual Tiger Ball in honour of Singapore. Every year, they have this annual ball - the Tiger Ball - and each year they feature one country and Singapore was the chosen country for the last dinner. The event allowed us to profile and showcase Singapore's culture, foods and traditions.”
“Dr Warren Lee has asked about our relations with Israel and the Palestinian National Authority. We have sustained our longstanding relationship with Israel, and made more friends among the Palestinians, through the visits last year of Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong and Speaker of Parliament Mr Abdullah Tarmugi to Ramallah. SM Goh and Speaker Abdullah's visits were indeed historic firsts for Singapore leaders to the PNA. These visits were invaluable as they gave us a better insight to the situation on the ground. We note that HAMAS has begun to moderate its position towards Israel and has expressed willingness to engage Israel in dialogue and diplomacy under certain conditions. And we urge HAMAS to renounce the use of violence and continue to make efforts to work with Israel to build lasting peace in the Middle East and an independent Palestinian state through the Quartet Roadmap. And now on the question raised by Ms Irene Ng on cultural diplomacy, I cannot agree more that cultural diplomacy is useful in bringing people together. To the question she asked about what face we have, what face will Singapore presents to the world, I think we all know that Singapore has many faces. "Uniquely Singapore" - that may be the Singapore Tourism Board's slogan and motto. But at MFA, we present Singapore in total. Having a Minister like Minister George Yeo, who came from MICA, one can surely rest assured that culture will be an important part of our agenda. Just as the Minister also came from MTI, economics is also an important part of our MFA agenda. We all would agree that when diverse people are culturally attuned to one another, they interact in a more open and trusting manner.”
“We need to inculcate and facilitate a culture of self-reliance, including through the informal sector. Finally, Sir, one other example of Government's effort to really help the needy, but which had not really taken off, is Project Hope. The Government has even made it simpler and more attractive through this Budget, but more should be done to allow a better reach-out. There are still many of those who could benefit from this scheme but are ignorant about it. For those who might have misgivings, they could still be counselled and made to see the benefits. Grassroots leaders should be deployed to scout for such families who could benefit from the scheme which could easily reap about $100,000 in HDB housing, education, training and other financial benefits. Fellow Members of Parliament should also help. They could refer young families who are struggling to cope with life and qualify for Hope to apply or send them for counselling, if and when necessary, particularly to the CDCs. More could be done to bring Hope to success. Mr Speaker, Sir, I support the Budget. 1.07 pm”
“Even for those who are re-employed, their salaries could be far lower than their previous salaries and might either need a second job or their spouses have to work. There are also those who cannot work full time because of family considerations. They might be able to work a few hours of the day or have to stay home to do some work. They need to resort to the informal sector to source for additional income. At the North East CDC, we have started various projects in the informal sector, including Push Carts and HomeWorks. The Push Carts scheme was a success, and it was later adopted by the WDA for implementation at the national level, working together with the Retail Promotion Centre. Through HomeWorks, the North East CDC teaches residents skills like jewellery making, flower arrangement, baking and hair dressing. We also facilitate a community kitchen where residents could cook and sell food. There is a limit, of course, as to how many CCs which could be used for such purposes. Void decks in some HDB estates, bus interchanges and business hubs where the community gathers, would have to be put to better use. This, however, would require a seamless approach among related Government agencies, including the NEA, HDB and Town Councils, to facilitate more of such ventures. The one-size-fits-all approach will not work. We cannot look for just administratively-efficient arrangements but also those that are user-friendly. We need a one-stop or what in Mandarin is called e tiau long approach to accommodate such needs. Gone were the days when those looking for jobs could turn to school tuckshops, hawking or peddling on their own. We therefore need to help facilitate new opportunities for such people to remain self-reliant.”
“But growingly, we do see now that people are becoming more realistic, whether in terms of employment or expecting financial assistance only as an interim measure. Mr Speaker, Sir, to save time, allow me to ask the Clerk of Parliament to circulate some examples of residents who are realistic in their expectations and have become more self-reliant. With some interim financial assistance, counselling and help from the VWOs, many of my residents realise the importance of the Workfare approach and self-reliance. Like what Mr Ang Mong Seng said just now, I like the spirit of ai pia, jia a nya. In the song, you will remember that it says about e sai kee, e sai lok, meaning you can go up and you can go down. But my residents are always very excited when I sing the song and instead of e sai kee, e sai lok, I say, e sai kee, boi sai lok, meaning you can go up but do not go down. Sir, we emphasise Workfare and not welfare as the way out for the long-term. To ensure a better understanding of Workfare, the CDCs are now taking a more comprehensive approach, including counselling, even case work and working with the VWOs. CDCs will be most glad though to receive more resources from MCYS to enhance their capacity building. The Government's approach towards Workfare is right and should continue to be the basis for social and financial assistance. Workfare Bonus should be work-based and this would encourage people to stay employed. This is all fine, especially for those who are employable and do find employment. We must, however, remember that there are still many who, following retrenchment, find real difficulties getting re-employed.”
“The Progress Package says a lot about Singapore's philosophy in terms of relationship between the Government and its people, an important partnership that has withstood the test of time and the challenges in between. General elections, notwithstanding, this partnership has taken Singapore through the last 40 years, each step taking the country and its people forward, true to the spirit of Majulah Singapura. It is about hard work, facing challenges squarely, unity of purpose, sharing prosperity and moving ahead together. Budget 2006 is also about Workfare, not welfare or any programme that could bring about a false sense of short term comfort, but long term interest. When the Government wants to share the fruits of growth with all Singaporeans it is based on Growth Dividends. Again, based on hard work first. When the Government wants to reward low wage workers, it is also based on employment and employability first, not just handouts. I share Mayor Amy Khor's concern about the crutch mentality. I had the same fear too. The last thing we would want to do is to make our people soft. Yes, we will want to handle the needy with a warm heart but not to spoil them cold. My experience working at the grounds with the Northeast CDC shows that it is all the more meaningful when we can help provide employment for the retrenched and those out of jobs. Dignity and self-help growingly is a norm with Singaporeans. There are quite a number of my Eunos residents who would come to my meet-the-people sessions and ask not for doles but for jobs. This was reassuring. There are, of course, those who tried to resort to the short term and easy way out by demanding financial assistance as though it was their entitlement.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, please excuse me for my bad throat. Iran air, where I was last week, was very, very dry, but I am sure this Budget will surely whet many appetites. Mr Speaker, Sir, first, allow me to join you to record my respects and to honour the late Mr S Rajaratnam. While he was better known for his ideas, ideals and as a Singapore ideologue, as was very well captured by Prof Chan Heng Chee in yesterday's Straits Times, to many Kampong Glam residents he was a man with a great heart. He cared. I know, as I was among the fortunate few who served in his tuition schemes in the late 60s for needy residents. His concern for all Singaporeans to progress and to live in harmony was also embodied in our Singapore pledge. Sir, to me, the spirit behind the PM's Budget Statement is this pledge of a place for everyone in Singapore. In short, it is about sharing our progress and prosperity, educating our people regarding the opportunities ahead, just as Ms Eunice Olsen has spoken about Opportunity Funds, and it is also about hope. Not least, a sharing of responsibilities. Mr Speaker, Sir, I think you will agree with me that it will not be an easy task to convince Singaporeans that it is not an Election Budget. In fact, some even say that they do not mind having elections every year if it means goodies every Budget. But the point would have been lost if we Singaporeans only elect to measure the Budget in short term benefits. Let us look beyond. Singaporeans need to understand the real thrust behind the Budget. Allow me, Mr Speaker, Sir to focus on three areas from the Prime Minister's Budget Statement to illustrate my point.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, can I seek clarification from the hon. Member? When she mentioned earlier on that she wanted the instructions or guidance to be done in four languages, does she mean that it includes Malay (Bahasa Melayu)? Because this is one area where I think Malay Muslims do not want to demand equal rights, unless the hon. speaker has some Bahasa-speaking high-rollers from the neighbouring countries in mind.”
“In this respect, Mr Deputy Speaker's suggestion yesterday that perhaps some of the taxes should go directly to fund these services, I think, is a laudable one. I think we need to ensure that winners can bank in their winnings safely, go home safely and live to become loyal repeat customers. We should not let crime rise outside the casino. We need to keep the underworld at bay. We also need to consider the role of junket operators, online gambling and cruise ship casinos in encouraging gambling among Singaporeans who have been kept out, one way or the other, from our own IRs. How do we stop these people from targeting our Singaporeans? We need to be equally concerned about foreign visitors to ensure that, for them, a visit to a Singapore casino will not turn into a financial disaster but a pleasant, if expensive, bit of entertainment. And finally, as parents, we need to show good personal examples to our children. Do we gamble at all? On or off the golf-course? Do we buy 4-D, Toto? Do we allow Internet gambling in our homes? Do we play video poker? Do we allow people to go for 4-D so easily? In fact, some of the people currently affected by gambling, spouses have said they would wish that the Government had a way to control these people. Finally, when I started asking people about the effects of the resorts, one elderly person said, "Look, look, look, don't talk about that. Where are the 35, 000 jobs? I want to be in line for one of them." So this issue has to be seen in its totality and not just on moral grounds. On this note, Sir, I support the IRs.”
“However, there will always be people who become problem gamblers and they leave a trail of destruction behind them. How do we protect their family members? We should perhaps pass legislation to protect CPF balances for the non-gambling spouse so that we prevent people from gambling away their retirement funds. It is difficult, but we should find a way to do this because I know that in Australia, one of the big problems is the elderly and retired gambling away their savings. I am heartened to know that ATM withdrawal limits and cash-only terms are measures being considered. But we really should go after the loan-sharks who prey in these casinos. We need to maintain our squeaky-clean and wholesome image in spite of the decision of casinos in our IRs. We can also perhaps make barring or gambling limits available to not just our own citizens, but hotel guests and their families. This would enhance the image of Singapore as a place where you could safely have a flutter but not lose your shirt. We need to strongly go after all forms of loan-shark activity and treat it as organised crime, so that loan- sharking becomes a very unattractive profession, just like drug trafficking, because both deal in human misery. We need to protect our womenfolk, perhaps, with new legislation to make sure they are not unwitting victims. We need to have organisations who have made known their opposition to the casinos to come forward and help those Singaporeans avoid and escape all forms of gambling - casino, lottery or otherwise. We need to adequately fund and build up services for those with gambling addiction and perhaps consider treating the worst cases in residential rehabilitation centres, like DRC. I think this can help with both casino and non-casino gambling.”
“To me, a key measure is the availability of the option to bar oneself or to bar a family member from the IRs, if he or she is at risk. We should perhaps extend this to all forms of gambling and also make this remedy available to medical professionals and community leaders, aware of, and responsible for a person with a gambling addiction. One woman whose ex-husband was a compulsive gambler asked me the obvious question: if I had barred my husband, would my husband have known who barred him? Would it not, as Mr Sin Boon Ann has also pointed out, cause all sorts of havoc at home? This is a real problem, given that many of these compulsive gamblers actually are already prone to spousal violence. So we have to think of a mechanism. Perhaps to say that only the spouse or children have the authority to do so and reveal who these people are may not be the best way. We should be aware that gambling is pre-existent and pervasive in our society and increasingly accessible via the Internet and easy travel options even at this time with no casino in Singapore. I think recent stories in the papers have borne this out. Hence, we need to emphasise parental advice and example. Perhaps we can draw a lesson from others. Many years ago, when I visited my cousins in Hong Kong, I realised that the news-stands in their rather upmarket residential area sold pornography quite openly and I asked my aunt how she protected her children from these influences. What she said then, 20 years ago, struck me. She said, "I tell my children, well, this is the way that other people may do things. But this is not the way our family does things." She recognised and confronted the issue and made sure that her children knew right from wrong. They are very successful now, by the way.”
“We are all rightly concerned about the 1%, 2% or 3%, maybe more, who will manifest gambling addiction, and so on. Dr Tan has asked whether one more family wrecked by gambling is worth all the money to be made. It is a serious thought. Yet, as a PAP MP, I know as many of my colleagues in this House know, that families are also wrecked by wage-earners losing their jobs and having no employment to turn to. I know that many have turned to gambling when they lose their jobs or when their businesses have gone downhill in an economic downturn. I know that moral and financial ruin can also come from irresponsible hire purchase decisions, ill-advised renovation loans and the pursuit of branded consumer goods and fashion accessories. So while statistics may show that gamblers may manifest more spousal violence, child abuse and so on, I know full well that these ills also increase markedly during an economic downturn. To be fair, we need to dig deeper into many of these statistics to determine conciliaty or, to put it simply, which is the chicken and which is the egg. The prospect of 35,000 jobs, a more vibrant tourist destination, more jobs for retail, F&B, transport and hospitality industries, a more attractive reason to be an air hub, a more lively city for an international workforce, more attractiveness as a commercial hub, these are very strong arguments. I would have to ask Dr Tan and many of my friends how many families must go hungry while we maintain our moral high ground. Yet I agree that we need to do more for the people who may be affected by this. We need to nip the problem in the bud the moment someone manifests behaviour that suggests that for him or her gambling has gone beyond responsible entertainment to destructive behaviour.”
“These attendees need to be able to mix business and pleasure at the same place. Most would like to dine, wine, shop, be entertained and then often bring home presents for their wives and kids because they feel a little guilty about having had such a good time. If we play it right, they would resolve to bring their family on the next trip, if they had a good and safe time. In many convention centres with casinos, a visitor would be hard-pressed to tell you where the casino was. But I think that sufficient numbers would visit, have a flutter and patronise the casino to make the cross-subsidies viable enough to support the total complex. As PM Lee had said, the numbers only seem to work out when you have a casino as part of an IR. I would urge the Government, however, to ensure that in evaluating the plans for the IR, that we actually make sure that the convention facilities are not tagged on as an after-thought, but really with the idea in mind of making sure that we become a serious mega venue for future conferences because you need the scale, human traffic, investments, classy shows and top-class museum exhibits to keep people coming back for more, year after year. Then you also need to keep upgrading and improving the facilities every five or 10 years. This then is why I think we have no choice but to build the integrated resorts. We sorely need the next generation of large convention and tourist facilities to attract the MICE business and remain an attractive destination for people, pleasure, planes and ships to visit. And, then we have to manage the downside. I share Dr Tan Sze Wee's concern that studies have shown that legalised gambling seems to increase the number of social and medical ills.”
“Such events can bring millions into the economy in the space of a few days, with spillover effects for all sorts of ancillary services and businesses, but only if the meetings actually come to town year after year. Yes, we have Changi and the Singapore Expo with their huge halls, but they are far away from the hotel belt and you would need to take the bus or MRT there. And the parking system, as many have found, is not always ideal. In fact, if you hold a meeting in the Suntec or Raffles City belt, you may find that delegates are unwilling even to put up in an Orchard Road belt hotel. Singapore has been touted as a top MICE destination in the last decade, but I think it would not even make it to the shortlist of mega venues for large events. The competition is hotting up as regional cities realise the potential of such business and gear up their facilities. Ms Ong Sor Chin, writing in the Straits Times, wondered whether having two IRs would adversely affect the business of our existing convention facilities. I think not. Smaller meetings would still benefit from the entertainment options that the two large IRs would bring and the added traffic would add buzz we so sorely need, and increasingly lack. Should a mega meeting come to town, numerous satellite meetings would need all the break-out rooms and hotel rooms we can muster in the downtown region. Remember, Macau is already planning an IR with 10,000 rooms on-site. Conventions for professionals are not like air shows and trade exhibitions. People need to be able to go from their hotels to the lecture theatres in the shortest time possible, while their partners and families get to do something interesting, or go shopping, and then have the whole group come together for a meal or entertainment at the end of the day.”
“Perhaps we should have our plain-clothes policemen looking out for these birds of prey and tackling them as they would tackle organised crime and drug-traffickers. Yes, there is an undeniable downside, if we were to bring in the casino. Yes, gambling can be a dehumanising addiction that drives people to do desperate and silly things to feed their addiction. Yet, we must see the bigger picture. What would happen if we did not have an integrated resort-type development? What would it take to bring in world-class attractions that would revitalise Singapore as a buzzing place to be? As a practising pediatrician and diabetes specialist, I often travel overseas to give medical talks and attend medical conventions. I know that what we have in Singapore pales in comparison to many convention centres and facilities abroad. Singapore's largest convention facility can perhaps take in 12,000 people, with 5,000 rooms within so-called walking distance. This sounds very impressive until you know of other places that can take in 18,000-20,000 people for scientific or professional conventions and trade exhibitions and still have room for many more and hotels, food outlets and entertainment nearby to accommodate people on all sorts of budgets and with all sorts of requirements. When you realise that these convention centres are often fully booked year round, you realise why the MICE (Meetings, Incentives, Conventions and Exhibitions) business is central to the economies of so many so-called second-tier American cities likes Las Vegas, Atlanta, Orlando, San Francisco, New Orleans, and so on.”
“I grew up in the Bukit Timah area and for many years endured the weekly traffic jams outside the old Turf Club, with its stream of people coming out after the races - the winners in cabs and cars; the losers in buses or walking home. After the races, few would look happy. Mostly, the faces looked dejected. But they came week after week and I resolved never to join them. Later, during my NS days in the SAF's drug abuse rehabilitation unit, I met soldiers who had gone AWOL to pay their own or their wives' gambling debts. I realised then that gambling could be an addiction, just like drugs. Later, I got to know residents, friends and colleagues with many sad stories to tell. Someone whose father gambled away their five-room flat; many others educated and not so well-educated who gambled away their businesses; and another whose husband started gambling soon after she became pregnant with their first child and later wrecked their marriage. Residents who came to me with stories of harassment by loan sharks, people forced to put their wives and girlfriends into prostitution to pay their gambling debts. I have heard of a respectable retiree teacher who gambled away $400,000 of retirement gratuity on cruise ship casinos. I have heard of housewives who crammed the 3.30 pm ferry back from Batam to Singapore, getting home just in time to cook for their husbands, having gambled away up to $500 in a day in the casinos in our neighbouring islands. I know that casinos will bring birds of prey, people who will be looking out for those running short of money - foreign students getting a taste of freedom, call girls and so on. I hope that Singapore's IRs, when they do come up, will address those questions squarely.”
“Dr Warren Lee (Sembawang): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I rise to speak in favour of the integrated resorts. People who know me as a Christian MP may well wonder why I take this stand. I am well aware that many thoughtful Singaporeans of all faiths and creeds have expressed their strong reservations about letting in the evils of casinos on our own land. Many have tried to persuade me to take a stand against the casinos and were disappointed when I did not. And I made my support for the IRs known to PM Lee sometime ago. As a pragmatic Christian MP, representing multi-racial and multi-religious constituency in a secular state, I join PM and his Cabinet colleagues and fellow MPs in stating that my stand is taken with a heavy heart and with full recognition of the potential downsides that the integrated resorts and associated casinos may bring. In the end, it is because I feel that the upsides outweigh the downsides and it is because I feel that we are better off, confronting and dealing with the phenomenon of problem gambling, rather than trying to prohibit all gambling and pretending that we are too nice a place for all these nasty things to happen. Like many others in this House, I have had the subject weighing upon my conscience and my thoughts for many months. I am personally against gambling. I do not gamble and have never as much as bought a Singapore Big Sweep ticket, Toto or 4-D. Like many other Singaporeans, I do take part in lucky draw promotions and support worthy causes with donation draws. But aside from that, no gambling for me. I have seen the effects of gambling.”
“Personally, I believe that if I expect others to respect my faith, it is morally and spiritually right for me to give my neighbours and friends, who do not see it as wrong to have casinos in Singapore and IRs in general, the respect and space for them to live life as they chose. Having said that, we should not take lightly the differences that have emerged over the issue. Many Singaporeans, I believe, will be reassured by the approach taken by the PM to reach out to community and religious organisations to explain further the Government decision and to encourage them to work together with the Government in tackling the issue and the problems that might arise. We must not allow the decision to go IRs divide the society. The painstaking efforts we have taken to make Singapore a more cohesive society should not be put at risk because of this issue. I would also like to urge community and religious organisations to respond positively to PM's call and work together for the common benefit of our Singapore. This is a win-win formula we cannot afford to lose. We must work together, whatever the challenges. Make this a "Uniquely Singapore" experiment. We have experimented with many ideas and projects which others even shudder to think about - some very controversial policies which we have initiated and followed on earlier on in our independence but proven to be right later on. But with the need for us to constantly watch what are the challenges and demands in terms of fine-tuning and adjustments that are required to make sure that our initial objective of the good for Singapore is not lost. Let this work too, not only in terms of material gains but also in our managing its social costs.”
“To quote a friend, Mr Ahmad Isa Rahim, "After hearing PM and the other Ministers spoke, especially Mr Wong Kan Seng, I am convinced that the Government is sincere in tackling the social cost for the IRs." He said it was a good start. He, like many other Muslim Singaporeans, and many other Singaporeans too, eg, Catholics and those who do not profess a religion, are also against it. But he is willing to accept why the Government had to make that decision, as long as we are prepared to tackle the problems that might arise. The sincerity is very clear. Here in Singapore, it is not a case of us going for IRs because we want to benefit a certain group or certain individuals with the kind of opportunities for development of the casinos. Here, I think the basic principle with which the Government has approached this issue is how do we use IRs to the advantage of Singaporeans and Singapore in general. That is for the benefit of all. But having said that, we recognise the problems that might arise. We accept the concerns which many Singaporeans have raised and we should tackle them collectively. Clearly, many Muslims will also be opposed to it but I believe that most Muslim Singaporeans would be able to understand that this is part of the reality of living in a plural and secular society. I am also confident that Muslim Singaporeans, even if they are against the idea, would understand the thinking behind Government's move and not confuse the casino issue with the IRs. I know they are inter-related, but while Muslims should choose not to work at the casinos, they should not deny themselves the job opportunities that will be created through the wider concept of IRs.”