Zainul Abidin Rasheed
Singapore
“I think much has been done as far as recovery is concerned, and the Japanese government itself is now paying due attention to reconstruction. Just at the Jakarta meeting, in fact, there was a lot of sharing of what has been done, and while they are grateful, they also look forward to us working together in terms of the reconstruction.”
“Kelp that he had met Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew when Mr Lee visited Moscow in 1970. Even though then Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew at that time showed an interest to learn from the Soviet socialist system, he changed his mind after visiting the Soviet Union and made changes to the political system and the system of governance in Singapore…”
“In my opinion, the measures and programmes to achieve progress are quite visible and numerous. The Community Leaders’ Forum network continues to develop. What else should be given attention to, especially in relation to dysfunctional families and divorce cases?”
“I found the Malay workers in the Middle East very encouraging. This is one of the best opportunities for us in this new area. Finally, the three-prong Government measure is to ensure that every citizen will continue to contribute towards the development of Singapore to ensure that every Singaporean will be given the best opportunity to en…”
“Sir, I believe ASEAN's credibility does not just hinge on Myanmar. ASEAN's credibility has been built over the years and we have shown a lot of credibility in many areas in terms of international relations.”
“As the President has said, when we take advantage of the existing opportunities through globalisation, we must also pay attention to the fact that these new opportunities should not result in a wide income gap.”
The complete record
Every one of 455 lines we hold for Zainul Abidin Rasheed, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 5 of 10.
“They fear the CPF cut will affect further their capacity to pay for their dream homes, and I do not mean just the landed properties and condominiums but, in fact, the modest `under one HDB roof'. Many also fear about what they see as escalating health and transport costs, meaning cost of living. Here, Acting Minister Khaw Boon Wan's strategy to look at the eight priorities, including cutting costs and making the medical care system more efficient and cost competitive, I am confident, will be well received. Sir, no matter how convinced the Government is about the need for the CPF retuning, the Government should not rush into the fast lane of changes, as the PM has announced today, to avoid unexpected ramifications that will upset the apple cart. Investors, I think, have always had tremendous respect for Singapore and the Government for its hard-nosed and hard-headed approach when faced with difficult decisions. Send the right signals we must, but phase in the changes so as not to make the effects too razor-like and in the process bleed many people unexpectedly and the consequences difficult to cope with. On this note, the phased changes announced by the PM will be welcomed by many. If the effect of the proposed changes in the mind of the Government is marginal or tolerable, Singaporeans need to be told so and in clear terms. Take some time to go to the ground through more dialogues and information sessions. I learned that the PM will also be having his own dialogue sessions with the ground. I think that is an excellent idea and I trust more people will understand further and appreciate those critical needs for change. Do not think only the lower 10-15% of the population will face the brunt of these challenges.”
“Sir, judging from the feedback and views expressed during the dialogue sessions Malay MPs held for activists and community leaders, the fears and concerns are real. Even though the recent announcement by the PM may be a relief, I am sure many are still asking, "What's next? And when is the next cut?" Many are simply frightened by what is to come. One even described the dreams of a Swiss standard of living Singaporeans were chasing for as a nightmare now. Obviously, that was an exaggeration too, as I believe Singaporeans have shown the steel they are made of and the best is yet to be. But no matter how much one hypes the mood or the challenges, it takes much more than promises to satisfy Singaporeans. Many Singaporeans' confidence regrettably has been shaken. But I am sure all is not lost. Singapore Government's track record of overcoming problems, the 1985 recession for one, must be the saving grace. Although it was a problem by itself, as Singaporeans have gone round to expect the Government to turn the economy as fast as it did a decade ago, the situation, as we all know, is not as simple as before. The effect of globalisation has cut deeper now. China and India threaten to blunt further Singapore's competitive edge. Cyclical changes and unemployment have gone structural, dumping thousands of our workers as irrelevant, unless they retrain and upgrade. Sir, even if we can convince and assuage Singapore workers to accept that this is the new order of the day, and change their mindsets, at peace with the need to make short-term sacrifices for the long-term gains, many Singaporeans feel they need help, at least for the short term.”
“Or the red wine. I do not drink either. But I do not know whether the non-alcoholic halal white wine or red wine will allow me to live to 90. But I hope maybe Mr Chiam will be able to use some of the palliatives rather than to keep asking the same questions about our reserves. Because I am glad that we have those kinds of reserves in Singapore. Otherwise, our currency and our assets would have been halved by now. Mr Speaker, Sir, I could not believe my ears when last night, a grassroots leader told me that he heard a friend using an old caricature in the 60s to express his anxiety about CPF changes and the gloomy economic picture. The caricature was about a lightning striking and cracking up a rice bowl. I think some of you of my age will remember that caricature. I do not know who did the caricature, but I guess it was done by the ruling Alliance Party then, which wanted to frighten voters from supporting the opposition PAP then. Well, we know the story. PAP went on to win handsomely. I guess this person must have exaggerated the position but, nevertheless, to highlight his anxiety and worries about the proposed CPF cut and uncertainties regarding employment and the economy. After all, many Singaporeans now realise that the days of the iron rice bowl, even in Government service, are over. So, as the Prime Minister said just now, he knows the feeling and thus the compromises made in fixing the CPF cut from what people expected to be 36% is now 33%. Singapore workers, I am sure, will feel very relieved. I do not know whether the private sector will react the same way. And I am sure they will say, "Cut not enough." But, I am sure, for most workers, "Money not enough" is more supreme.”
“Sir, my question is on quarantine. But, before that, I would like to share this sentiment about a job well done by our medical providers, and we hope that they will continue with the courage and serve us well. On the question about quarantine, the Pasir Panjang Wholesale Centre incident has shown us the risk of mass quarantine. I gather that there are some essential services which are now trying out alternative groups, where some groups are encouraged to break up into two distinct groups, so that they do not meet each other in case one should contact SARS. To what extent is this necessary and how far do we go in determining the level of the need to break up into two groups? For example, the CDC is thinking of doing that. I was told mass media groups are also looking at dividing themselves into two groups and working differently. What about our Cabinet? I see that all the Ministers are here. What are the risks of one contracting SARS and us losing or quarantining all the Cabinet members?”
“Sir, I am speaking on MUIS and Muslim affairs, forging a better unity. Sir, at the last North East District meeting, one participant asked for the doing away with the position of Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs. The resident, interestingly a Malay, sees it as an anomaly in the context of a secular Singapore and also in our efforts at pursuing a Singaporean Singapore society. Sir, I believe Singapore still needs a position of the Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs. It is important to see the role in its correct perspective, especially in the context of multi-racial and multi-religious harmony and integration. May I ask the Minister to share with us how he sees that role and what are some of its challenges? Similarly, MUIS' position is also unique. Its credibility must be preserved and indeed enhanced, not by the nature of its statutory position, but by the rapport building and respect from the people. What has the Minister's and MUIS' experience been over the last year, particularly following the September 11 and the Bali bombing, in forging better understanding of the issues at hand and in achieving better bonding? Sir, MUIS' credibility is also as important in the eyes of the non-Muslims, being the only statutory board with a religious role in secular Singapore. MUIS needs to play its part in bringing about better understanding and rapport with non-Muslim organisations and the community at large. MUIS could initiate an annual inter-religious gathering to foster better understanding. After all, the Inter-Religious Organisation (IRO) was initiated by the famous Muslim scholar, Maulana Abdul Aleem Siddique. Would the Minister share with us what has MUIS done in promoting better racial and religious harmony in the schools and on the national front?”
“Grassroots harmony journeys to mosques, temples and churches are important and must continue, but we should see more substantive programmes organised that would promote better understanding and integration. The better mixing and meeting of hearts and minds at the HDB heartlands should be one success criterion. There is room for more bridging among Singaporeans to bring about greater comfort level among neighbours, in particular, through Harmony Circles. And I hope the Minister will share with us what is being done in that direction.”
“Sir, my cut is on a cohesive and resilient society. This mission of MCDS will get more complex. It is already very challenging by itself because of the nature of our very own multi-racial and multi-religious society. It would be made even more sensitive and potentially divisive when external developments and forces come into play. The war with Iraq and the continuing fight against terrorism, with its Muslims and perceived Islamic connection, will make MCDS' task more onerous and formidable. Sir, allow me to touch briefly on the Iraq crisis and its immediate impact on our cohesion. Although till early this morning, I was still praying, like many other Muslims and non-Muslims all over the world, for peace and no war, we know that in fact it was inevitable. The US has already fired its first salvo. And the prayer notwithstanding, Sir, we have to deal with the realities of war and peace. Muslim Singaporeans do not want to be in the spotlight again. Even among Muslims generally, there is no love lost for President Saddam Hussein but they are, nonetheless, disturbed like many millions of other non-Muslims, as they worry for the innocent Iraqis who are also victims of the situation. We pray and hope that they will be spared a prolonged disaster. And we, as a country and a people, Muslims and non-Muslims alike, I trust we rally to the call to provide humanitarian aid to the Iraqi people. Sir, back to MCDS, how are MCDS' efforts for better integration taking shape, especially through IRCCs, GROs and VWOs? Does the Ministry see the momentum picking up, and are more ordinary citizens participating in Harmony Circles?”
“Sir, there is a cut on birds and crows, and they can talk about eagle and birdies! My cut is on global and regional cooperation. So, I will go straight to MOT and save some time! Environment, Sir, knows no boundaries. As the Minister has said just now that there was still some haze affecting our PSI, but my own observation is that we had less last year. Was it because of better regional cooperation on environmental matters? And will the situation last? Now that Singapore has drawn a very impressive experience in terms of urban development and environmental management, what are our plans to share the experience with the region and the world? Singapore's strength lies in the ability to deal with the host of environmental sustainability challenges in the city development context, be it water, waste management or air quality. So the expertise we have acquired over the years would be relevant to other developing countries in their efforts to address challenges brought about by urbanisation and development. So, in addressing these environmental sustainability challenges, how does Singapore see the process of sharing with fellow developing countries its own experience, especially in the field of urban environmental management? How do we intend to do so and what would be our priority? Finally, while we share with others our experiences, who do we learn from to meet our own needs? Is it everybody, somebody, nobody or anybody?”
“Sir, war or no war, energy is a strategic resource which we do not actually produce. If we were to drive around at night, whether in the city or in our housing estates, we realise that there is room for energy conservation. I would like to ask the Minister what is the pattern of energy utilisation in Singapore and what lessons can we draw from them in terms of energy conservation. What can the Ministry do to facilitate better energy conservation and optimisation, both for the commercial and residential areas? Does the recent awareness and need for greater safety and security result in our using more energy for lighting up purposes? And how does the Environment Ministry reconcile this need for new use of energy and electricity with conservation?”
“Sir, my topic is on waste minimisation. New water sources are one aspect of the need to educate Singaporeans about the value of water in Singapore. Minimisation of wastage is another. What are the plans to bring the message across to a wider cross-section of Singaporeans? Who are the worst wasters - commercial or residential users? What about hawker centres? 11.15 am We know that plastic bags and thimbles are being distributed free and that is a good way. But does ENV check whether those paraphernalia that are distributed are being applied in the households? If water use is still relatively unchanged after this campaign, what more will ENV do to minimise wastage?”
“Sir, while we are sitting here today, 150 government ministers and Heads of States are now attending the Third World Water Forum in Kyoto, Japan, calling for help for 1.4 billion people without access to safe drinking water. Singapore has a lot to be grateful for. The shortage of our own source of water supply has made us venture into new sources of water, including NEWater and desalination. To me, NEWater represents the spirit of Singapore. We have shown that, in times of need, we would master technology and, with our strong will to protect our independence, we are willing to do what is necessary. The result is NEWater. But, I suppose the battle is not over, because there are Singaporeans who are still relatively uncomfortable with NEWater. Sir, my question is: what more is the Ministry doing to help Singaporeans to be more comfortable with NEWater, and what are the plans to use NEWater through the reservoirs? In fact, I was attending a meeting, and someone said, "Why is Singapore, which is very well-known for being pragmatic, not using NEWater directly for consumption, because it has been proven to be very clean and safe?" I agree with the approach taken by the Ministry of the Environment to take it step by step. I would like to know what the plans are, in terms of our use of more NEWater in our reservoirs. What are the challenges to NEWater in terms of acceptance, and how will the Ministry of the Environment manage it? I would also like to ask whether the Ministry would look at other technologies available, to make more new sources of water available.”
“Sir, if one were to visit our local hospitals, especially when approaching the nurses' station, one sometimes wonder whether one was in Manila! This reminds us how short we are in terms of our local nurses. Indeed, there is a shortage of nurses worldwide. Just as our nurses are sought after from all over the world, including the Middle East and the UK, we too open our hospitals to foreign nurses. I believe we have employed nurses from various countries, including China and the Philippines. Which other countries do we have nurses from? What was the experience like with these foreign nurses in terms of the quality of their professional nursing skills? Are there plans to open the door to nurses from other countries too? In addition, Sir, what is MOH doing to attract and train more local nurses?”
“Sir, over the past week, MOH has been rather busy with its media blitz to inform Singaporeans about affordable healthcare. We have Medisave, MediShield and Medifund to provide that cover. The radio advertisement spoke about the importance of the above three schemes to make healthcare affordable. It said that 99% of appeals for Medifund were approved. That is reassuring indeed. May I ask the Minister what is the experience with Medisave and MediShield, whether they both are meeting the needs of average Singaporeans when it comes to meeting hospital bills? How have Singaporeans coped with the total hospital bill when Medisave and MediShield can only cover partial cost of the hospital bill and also for selected health situations? What about outpatient charges? From feedback, it is not cheap. My own personal experience is that when I got my finger caught in the door, it cost more than $100 just for treatment and to visit the specialist. What more can MOH do to moderate charges at outpatient clinics, and thus make healthcare more affordable?”
“Sir, we always enjoy a good joke from Prof. Low. I wish he could keep his jokes halal! Recently, I visited an egg farm in Lim Chu Kang and also the AVA HQ in Jurong. There, I learnt that Singaporeans consume one million eggs a day, most of it imported though. In these days of very health conscious Singaporeans, I wonder whether that is good. Nevertheless, I am glad to learn that many of the sources of egg supply are now run by companies with Singapore investments, although they are overseas. Food, we all know, is of strategic value, and in these days of terrorism, including bio-terrorism, one cannot be too careful about our food supply. I also learnt that the egg farm I visited is the only one in Singapore. I realise we are short of land, but is one egg farm all that we can afford in Singapore? I would like the Minister to answer that. On a wider issue, Sir, what is the progress of Singapore's efforts to be less dependent on food imports, and our move to be more self-sufficient in food supply? Sir, I was also very impressed by the work done by AVA, specifically on food testing and food control. I saw the growing use of technology at the AVA but also how crammed the office space was. Thus, I was glad to learn that the AVA will be moving to its new and better premises somewhere in Jurong too. May I ask the Minister what provisions have been made to meet the growing challenge of technology in meeting AVA's role, including coping with genetically modified (GM) food?”
“Madam, I am speaking on this cut on rejuvenated public housing estates. Just before that, I would like to join hon. Member Tan Boon Wan to also express our thanks to HDB and Ministry of National Development for the Lift Upgrading Programme at Eunos, Aljunied GRC. I think one of the HDB success stories is also in the way they have rejuvenated their housing estates. Geylang Serai is due for SERS. We would have read in the papers and the media that there has been a very positive response from the residents of that area. I think we also know that the MP for that area, Mr Mohamad Maidin, has been working very hard towards that end. As we all know, Madam, Geylang Serai is very well-known for its deep histo- rical, social and political roots. Singapore would be the loser if the rejuvenated Geylang Serai would lose its special place as far as the hearts of the Malays are concerned. In fact, no Malay in Singapore would feel complete if he has not gone to Geylang Serai during Ramadan in preparation for his Hari Raya. For that matter, ask any Bruneian or Malaysian Malay who has come to Singapore. I think he will be able to regale us with his stories and experiences in visiting Geylang Serai. I, for one, actually enjoy the vanishing food which you can still find in Geylang Serai today. Just to share an experience with you. Even our Member of Parliament, Mr Yatiman Yusof, got married in Geylang Serai. I was there during that wedding. Madam, my question about Geylang Serai's rejuvenation is: what are the plans of HDB to ensure that the new Geylang Serai would not lose that ethnic culture and historical attraction that it has?”
“Madam, the role of HDB now carries a different meaning. HDB has, metaphorically and literally, been a household word. HDB's role has been, for a long time, synonymous with public housing. With it come the social sensitivities connected with different public housing needs, not just commercial interest. With corporatisation, and HDB farming out more and more public housing to the private sector, how would MND and HDB ensure that public interests are not compromised? Would MND and HDB consider setting up an advisory board to handle grievances from the public, especially when HDB is corporatised? Madam, today's Berita Harian highlighted some of the predicaments faced by HDB applicants following the new rules introduced by HDB, eg, when applying for loans through commercial banks, they were subjected to the tightest scrutiny, so much so that those who have problems with credit balances, or loan repayments, were not allowed loans by the banks, although they claimed that they had cleared those loans or credit balances. Would HDB explain why the need for corporatisation and what more changes can the public expect following this major shift in HDB's position?”
“Madam, what I wanted to say on the question of Iraq has actually been answered by Prof. Jayakumar quite eloquently. But I just wanted to say that there is more to life than after Iraq and Palestine. Because Singapore has played a very important role in terms of its contributions and influence in matters pertaining to the United Nations, Law of the Sea Conference and the World Environment Summit. What will MFA do to ensure that our credibility and standing in the eyes of the world remain, especially when we face issues like Palestine and Iraq?”
“Recognising the importance of the Singapore-Malaysia relations, beyond water and Pedra Branca, especially in the context of the global and regional fight against terrorism, how would MFA go about mending fences and bridging bilateral relations and bringing them to an even keel again?”
“Madam, Singapore-Malaysia relations are so mired with problems that sometimes one wonders whether it is worth all the trouble to keep it afloat or to believe that a win-win working relationship is at all possible. One can understand if that kind of feeling crops up every now and then, especially lately, but one cannot forget the fact that we will continue to be neighbours and we need to make the best of that. Our post-independence history is short, but we have witnessed many rounds of acrimony, in fact, Singapore-bashing. Singapore took all that in her stride, until recently, when Singapore decided to lay bare the facts once and for all to clear the air about the many accusations that were thrown at Singapore over water, Pedra Branca and the bridge issues, among others. Even talk about war was bandied about irresponsibly. Well, that was how we saw it. Malaysia saw things differently. In fact, the Malaysian media had carried out their campaign so successfully that many, if not most, Malaysians swallowed their story hook, line and sinker, much to the detriment of people-to-people relationship. There were exceptions. For example, there were Malaysians who practically called on the Malaysian government to stop the wayang and to stick to the facts and principles of the issues at hand, like what Singapore did. My questions are: what are the lessons Singapore should learn from this? How would the recent spat colour the way we handle bilateral relations? We have our perspectives, and they theirs. Where shall the twain meet?”
“Like at the North East CDC, the Students Middle Aged and Senior Citizens (SMS) approach will provide opportunities wide enough for all to realise their potential for entrepreneurship and being enterprising. Our national efforts at promoting entrepreneurship should also cover as wide and as deep an area as possible. In short, jobs, JELL and entrepreneurship should provide us the glue that would bind the people together in good or in bad times. Economics, or livelihood, after all, is the best bond for social cohesion. It is easy to say that the Government should and could do more but this is also an opportunity for us, the people, to ask ourselves: what have we done more to help ourselves and the economy in these uncertain times? Yes, the Government must and will have to take the lead but the people must also have the will to learn and unlearn many times around what holds for the future economy and the challenges of uncertainties. Let us not swallow the Oliver Twist culture for more hook, line and sinker unthinkingly. Instead, more Singaporeans should stand up, fighting for - in the words of SMS, Mr Khaw Boon Wan - a 'more than good' chance to be the best through a competitive culture called ERC - Enterprising and Resourceful Culture. Sir, I support the motion in the name of the Minister for Finance.”
“It could be as innocent as senior workers - those 45 and above - not wanting to attend classes for perceived fear of holding back others, to the more serious ones like those having mental blocks to upgrade, especially with computer training. The not-so-young 45 and above, concept of retirement - for a long time pegged to the 55-year mark - needs redressing, and their grey mindset about-one-job whole-life career too needs sensitive overhauling. Counselling for second and alternative careers needs to be looked at carefully as there is a serious shortage of counsellors working on the ground, whether at MOM, CDCs or VWOs. On a related but important new frontier, the Government's call for more entrepreneurs deserves closer scrutiny by all for the opportunities they come with. More can be done to upgrade and expand opportunities and open up new fronts for employment. We have often heard that not enough was done to support the nation's call for our budding entrepreneurs. From the stories we read or heard or saw in the media, the new budding - and now more successful - entrepreneurs did it on their own steam. That is what entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship are all about. Nevertheless, I personally believe that we could do a lot more to sow the seeds for more entrepreneurial flowers to bloom. While we would want to see more local entrepreneurs to succeed, creating employment in the process, I feel that it is equally important for the Government to nurture the spirit of enterprise in as many Singaporeans as possible. With your indulgence, Mr Speaker, Sir, the North East CDC believes so. We start young, even at primary schools. In fact, the need to instill the spirit of enterprise should cover all age groups.”
“The number of fellow Singaporeans hauled to court for bankruptcy, for example, must have risen, desperate and not knowing how to save themselves. All these will certainly have an impact on their self-confidence. When the number of those affected is large enough, either from a social and low income group or, worse, a particular race - as a significant percentage of those affected are Malays and Indians - the problem becomes more acute. There is a need to look at this problem of financial squeeze in the short term while we pursue to prepare them to overcome their predicament for the long term through education and training. Mr Speaker, Sir, the hon. Member, Dr Wang Kai Yuen, earlier this morning described the situation in three words: Jobs, Jobs, Jobs. I agree. But may I add that the solution is in a 4-letter word, an abbreviation: JELL. It is not a signal for a short cut nor a quick fix. But, indeed, it is to emphasise a longer term view for the future. JELL stands for Jobs, Employability and Lifelong Learning. This is also the approach at the North East CDC. I am therefore happy to welcome the decision by the Government to establish a statutory board in charge of Lifelong Learning and Training. MOM, NTUC, CDCs, self-help groups and voluntary welfare organisations will tell us that there are serious hurdles to overcome for training and retraining. The untiring efforts shown by MOM and other complementary agencies must continue and should bear fruit. The Government, the Ministry of Finance in particular, should not leave any stone unturned here to provide the infrastructural and financial help needed to give the new board a fighting chance to succeed and to excel. The mindsets and attitude problems on the ground are real.”
“This, Sir, reminds me of an anecdote, more like a joke. There was a time during the Cold War days when China used to provide a lot of financial aid to many African countries. One day, Chairman Mao got very upset because these satellite countries were getting spoilt. He decided to give them a dose of reality check. He sent them a note: "Comrade, yes, times are bad, but we cannot go on like this depending on others for help all the time. We must each do our part. Tighten your belts." Then came one reply: "Comrade Mao, you are right. We agree. We must tighten our belts. Yes, Comrade, please do send the belts." Mr Speaker, Sir, the situation faced by many of our retrenched and unemployed is no laughing matter. Much of the interim assistance given out has been exhausted, and even those forced to take lower paying jobs are now faced with loans and arrears beyond repair. Money owed to Singapore Power for electricity and water has led to many now living without those amenities. I do not have the numbers, but perhaps during the Committee of Supply, the relevant Ministry would be able to give us an update. But this situation must have dented the level of self-confidence and self-esteem in many of those affected. I dare say that many of those caught in this predicament are victims of their own situation and financial mismanagement. They will say that it is easy for people like us to say that. Nevertheless, their problems are real and they need urgent help. I dare not, however, say that we must provide more of Government assistance to get them out of the deep hole. Welfarism is not the way out. But how do we fare as Government and fellow Singaporeans in the face of these needy cases?”
“It never gave up. Even the GRC-based approach was taken, through Pasir Ris-Punggol, for better focus, with geographical considerations taken into account. Temporary employment through Town Councils too for those in arrears, pioneered by Pasir Ris-Punggol Town Council, thanks to the hard work by its Chairman, the hon. Member, Mr Charles Chong. The scheme is now extended to Tampines and Aljunied Town Councils. Mr Speaker, Sir, times are bad, all right. My CDC officers now tell me that there has been a change in attitude lately. More of those who came to seek help are less choosy. More desperate perhaps, savings dry up, relatives' help not as forthcoming, and more are even prepared for training and retraining. Before, it was difficult to convince them to go for training and retraining, they were thinking that the Government, with its past track record, would be able to turn the economy around in no time, and they would go back to their old jobs. I personally know of cases of those who, having worked as policemen, firemen, water boat men or tug boat men, did not see themselves in alternative work. They wanted to work in the same jobs till retirement. They are proud of the work they did, and they were good workers indeed. But those jobs are no longer available. This is the structural unemployment which the Government has been trying to prepare Singaporeans for, especially in terms of training and retraining. But some, perhaps many, did not take heed. Mr Speaker, Sir, the CDC experience shows how we have tried and how sad sometimes the stories can be. They serve as a reality check as to how difficult times can be, especially for those in need. As hon. MP, Mdm Cynthia Phua, said yesterday, many have to tighten their belts.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, practically all Singaporeans know we face uncertain times. Obviously, difficult times too. But the degree differs. And this can be seen in the way many of the unemployed and the retrenched behave. Contrary to what hon. Member, Mr Low Thia Khiang, said earlier, jobs are still available - plenty in fact - but not the ones many of the retrenched or the unemployed are waiting for or willing to accept. They give many and varied reasons why they chose not to accept the jobs matched or assisted by the CDCs, for example. Among them: "Money no enough"; "Jauh lo - distance. How can I work in Jurong? I stay in Punggol, you know?"; "No shift, please"; "Weekend free, can or not?"; "Admin job only, OK?" These are some of the responses that we got from many of those who actually came forward to seek help. We can understand the low salary as being a not strong enough pull, especially when a person, having benefited from the high wage policy and earning about $1,800-$2,000 after working for about 10-15 years suddenly finds himself retrenched, with two kids in school and has recently upgraded to a 4- or 5-room flat. Thus, for someone like him - and there are many of them - the $1,000 salary, with a take-home of about $850, in the mind of such a person, surely "money no enough". But after months of waiting, surely it is better to grab the $850 rather than no money at all, except for the interim assistance from Government, which is less. Mr Speaker, Sir, the CDCs try. Nearly 5,000 applied for assistance last year at the North East CDC, out of which 65% were matched, but only 14% placed with jobs. From the macro job fairs held with the help of the Ministry of Manpower to a more focused Compassvale locality and industry-based job fair, the CDC tried and tried.”
“Mdm Deputy Speaker, I have two supplementary questions. One, the Minister's statement has been a watershed development in more ways than one. In other words, it is no goreng pisang matter for anyone to take it lightly. It is, in a way, a matter of our lifeline. My question is: how does the Minister intend to get the message across the Causeway to the Malaysian people when the Malaysian media and leaders are bent on giving misrepresentations? Secondly, having bared the facts - and Singapore needs to do that - how does the Minister ensure that it does not add unnecessary heat to the important bilateral relations which are already emotionally charged in Kuala Lumpur and with the word "war" being bandied around irresponsibly?”
“This is a battle we do not have to, and cannot fight alone. I would like to urge the Government to enhance regional cooperation so as to ensure that no one group can abuse the common borders for any terrorist attacks. There are more that can be done in terms of regional cooperation in this fight against terrorism, and we certainly look forward to our neighbours sharing this sense of urgency. Sir, on a final note, we must do all we can to find ways to make both our Muslim Singaporeans and non-Muslim Singaporeans to be at ease with each other. Yes, there will be a certain amount of awkwardness, as mentioned by Mr Wong just now, but let that be just a passing wind. Let us look to the IRCC and Harmony Circles to bridge better relations and understanding at the HDB heartland. More Malays/Muslims should use this opportunity to improve the level of participation at the grassroots level. There is now an unprecedented demand for a better understanding about the Malay-Muslim way of life and the Malays/Muslims should not waste this opportunity for better bridging and better understanding. On a lighter note, Sir, although it is quite late, it would not be long before Mr Rafi of Marine Parade will be comfortable again with his sarong, where and when he chooses to wear, although I personally feel that the sarong is best worn at home.”
“He would not allow mosques to be misused and seminaries to become schools for hatred. In Malaysia too, the ruling government has begun its crackdown on rural religious schools (SARs) that sow hatred against the government by withdrawing funding. Fortunately, for Singapore, the bad influence was marginal and had been nipped in the bud. Nevertheless, it happened and can happen again. It is therefore the duty of all to ensure such tendencies do not repeat. MUIS and local Muslim groups and leaders have done well in responding to the call to reject extremist views and acts of terrorism. The Malay MPs have stated unequivocally their position to reject the JI and its extremist agenda. Together with the Malay community, they have pledged to continue to work with other Singaporeans to bring about a more cohesive, multi-racial and multi-religious society. Realising that the fight against terrorism and extremism will be a long-drawn affair, the Malay MPs call on everyone, Malays and non-Malays alike, to stand up and work together to strengthen mutual trust and confidence and move on as a nation. When I was in Delhi in November, I learned that further bloodshed was avoided when the Muslim organisations came out in force to condemn the violent and terrorist attacks by extremist Muslim groups on the Hindu community in Gujerat. Similarly, following a denial mode in Indonesia from most Muslim groups, the Bali bomb blast of October 12 jolted them to work alongside the Government to fight terrorism. This, I was told, avoided a very serious backlash between the majority Hindus in Bali and the minority Muslims on the island. Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore have this unique opportunity to work together to remove such unhealthy radicalism among fringe Muslim groups.”
“Most of the delegates rejected the theory and the conference ended in failure, much to the chagrin of the host. Delegates then participated in demonstrations, peaceful though, on the streets of Tripoli for the Palestinian cause and some were even approached to serve in the shadow cabinet-in-exile for the Moros of the Philippines. There were lots of sympathies for many causes of the Muslim then world-wide, but that did not make us, in fact, most delegates, see the need to go the JI way or to resort to terrorism. The serious threat of misconceived "Jihad" or "Holy War", is real, even till today. Mr M J Akbar, writing in his book, The Shade of Swords, Jihad and the Conflict between Islam and Christianity, concludes that "Defeat (of Osama and Al Qaeda and the Talebans) is only a setback in the holy war. The Jihad goes on". However, that should not alarm us, as it is not new. The power of jihad, for some, pervades the mind and soul of Islam. The mind is where the current battle will be fought, and this is why it will be a very long war. Muslim Singaporeans should realise that they should not be pawns, nor proxy, to such battles. The lesson from Pakistan is clear. After a bloodbath separation from India to form its own country of majority Muslims, it is now seen as a hotbed of this battle of the mind. M J Akbar wrote that Pakistan has become a haven of terrorists who have created "a state within a state". He said that no one said this more clearly than President Pervez Musharraf, when in an address to the nation a year ago, asked for an end to the culture of jihad. He told the extremist clergy that they must stop encouraging gullible young men into martyrdom, as he would not want Pakistan to take the responsibility for jihad across the world.”
“The collective rejection of the JI and acts of terrorism by the more than 120 Muslim groups in Singapore bodes well for Singapore and our fight against extremism and terrorism. Non-Muslim Singaporeans, on their part, should remove any fear of Muslims or Islam in general and instead work hand-in-hand with the Muslim community to rid of this menace. Talking about ISD, Sir, I remember their professional work standards which Singapore can be proud of. Back in 1973, when the University of Singapore Muslim Society was invited by President Moammar Ghaddafi to attend the International Youth Conference, they knew about it. I had to convince the ISD officers that the University of Singapore Muslim Society representatives, including myself, were moderate Muslims, even though we were going to Libya, and that they have nothing to worry about. We were open and transparent about the matter but, despite that, both the USMS representatives were stopped at the airport on their return and all the publications were confiscated for checking. I was furious as they had doubted me and my loyalty, I thought, but on hindsight, was happy that they were thorough and professional in their conduct and work. During that two-week stay in Libya, many things happened. Yes, most of those who attended the conference were in search of answers for their troubled situations back home and in the Muslim world. Where was the answer promised by Islam? There were so many double standards and hypocracies felt in international relations. It was true then, and I am sure you will say the same for now. Ghaddafi had proposed Islam as the Third International Theory, where he said that capitalism and Communism had failed, and brought about the Green Book, as his answer to the world's predicaments.”
“" But I feel this White Paper should be made essential reading for as many Singaporeans as possible, if we want to ensure that the challenge of terrorism we face is understood as national. Teachers, community leaders, including religious leaders, need a good understanding of the issue and the role they can play to bring about better social cohesion. However, the White Paper needs to be reduced to simpler language and creative graphic representations to reach as many Singaporeans as possible. Muslim Singaporeans should feel reassured that the White Paper made it clear that the large majority of Singapore Muslims and Islam were not at fault. It is this small group of misguided JI-type Muslims which Muslim Singaporeans and non-Muslim Singaporeans alike are concerned about. It is worth reiterating that this is not a question of Muslims and Islam yet again under the spotlight. Thanks to ISD, also the regional security cooperation with the relevant authorities in Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines and many other international players, Singapore was able to nip the problem in the bud. The efficacy and good intentions of the ISD need not be doubted. Networks of terrorist destruction work in strange and most irresponsible ways. They care not lives of innocents, and rationalise such dastardly acts even with religious conveniences and mis-justifications. It is also noteworthy that the original tip-off that led to the JI arrests came from a Muslim Singaporean, just to emphasise that Muslims and non-Muslims alike will have to fight this battle together. Yes, the JI is Muslim-connected, so is the Al-Qaeda, but Muslim Singaporeans must be bold enough to reject them as their methods bring terror, not solution to the problems faced.”
“For those not convinced, even the question of why no public confession was yet raised, despite the explanation given why such an approach was stopped following the experience of earlier ISA arrests. All these add to the notion how complex the issue is and why we need to continue to educate and reach out to more Singaporeans to make them understand how national this issue is and why it needs more careful handling. Muslim Singaporeans who still feel uneasy about them and their religion Islam being in the spotlight yet again, rest assured that it is more of the effort on the part of the Government to throw more light on the JI arrests, the JI members' operations, their psyche, their regional and global connections and their deadly dastardly schemes. For those who openly or secretly empathise with such suicidal terroristic methods of furthering the JI cause, think how you would feel if your own innocent flesh and blood fell victim to such bombings or attacks. If you say it is still all right, then the problem is even more serious. Some, although having accepted the threat of JI and terrorism, wondered why the Government prolonged the debate. "The sooner we close the matter, the better", fearing that the image of Muslim Singaporeans would be affected, not only locally but all over the world. They question the need to place the White Paper on sale and made available freely. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I feel otherwise, as I agree with the need for the White Paper to be issued and debated. However, I trust the Minister will explain why the price was pegged at a high of $22 each when we would like it to reach more citizens. I believe there are many Singaporeans who feel, "Oh, no, not another JI report!", or "Why place the Muslims under the spotlight again?”
“Yes, visits to mosques, temples, churches and clan associations must continue, dialogues on how to handle differences made a staple programme for grassroots organisations, but the underlying foundation to better understanding should be greater tolerance and acceptance in diversity. Race and religious relations should be inclusive rather than exclusive. Most importantly, a total rejection of terrorism, no matter what their causes. The White Paper in front of us for debate has called this threat of JI-types and of terrorism as a national one. Do enough Singaporeans know what that means? Do Singaporeans really know how serious the threat is? Judging from the reaction of some of whom I have met, I am not sure they do. For sure, not many Singaporeans have read the White Paper. We hope many more will follow the Parliamentary debate on the White Paper, as it is critical that as many Singaporeans as possible understand what holds. Singaporeans better believe that this threat is real. JI is real, and the threat of terrorism, whatever the cause, is real. Any sense of denial, as still held by some, will not help. However, this needs to be addressed, perhaps through more dialogues, even at grassroots level, as some generally responsible grassroots leaders do seem to still harbour such feelings of scepticism. At a recent Feedback Unit dialogue which I chaired, for example, there are still those who are sceptical about the findings, even to the point of doubting the integrity of the ISD. "Was force used?", they asked. "Why not charge them in open court, if there are already enough evidence?", they asked. I hope the booklet "Why the ISA", recently issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs, will help to explain and convince more why Singapore has to tackle the issue this way.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I rise in support of the motion in the name of the Minister for Home Affairs. Sir, I empathise with those who wish that the debate on this issue should not be prolonged, especially so for one who is the 13th speaker of the day! Enough is enough, some might say, both by Muslims and non-Muslims in Singapore. Perhaps, a sentiment felt more by the Muslim Singaporeans. But for those who believe so, Mr Wong's remarks earlier, I trust, would explain why this White Paper had to be presented to Parliament. Muslim Singaporeans should rest assured that this Paper is not about finding fault with the overwhelming majority of Muslims who are moderate and tolerant. Indeed, these Muslim Singaporeans themselves feel that they are the victims of this small group of misled Singaporeans who tried to hijack Islam. It bears reiterating that the majority of Muslim Singaporeans believe in living peacefully with others, especially in this plural, multi-racial and multi-religious Singapore. It will reassure the Muslims that this debate is not about finger-pointing Islam as the cause for all the ills brought about by the face of terror today. Yes, Muslims will be quick to point out that there is only one Islam, but they cannot deny that there are many faces of Muslims and many ways how Islam is interpreted or, worse, abused. Even here, there is room for better understanding among Muslims themselves, and also by the non-Muslims. There are many grey areas here, where black-and-white pronouncements might not be the quick answers towards better understanding. It is a long haul, and requires patience, perseverance and wisdom in handling it. It calls for continued confidence-building. It is not the form that matters.”
“One sure way to encourage it is to ensure that students know that wherever their passions may be, they will be supported and given an avenue of expression by the education system. Mr Speaker, Sir, however sound the principles proposed, the teachers must be prepared to play their part. Teachers come with their own mindsets too. A good remake programme is necessary to help prepare teachers for their new role. This needs time and closer scrutiny. One other area which would help the proposed changes to take root faster is to infuse more foreign students especially from countries which have a more open and liberal structure. Scholarships could be offered for some of such students to encourage our students to also open up and benefit from the new system. On a final note, Sir, these proposed changes clearly send a strong signal on the needs for change. Similarly, I hope those running `alternative' systems, the madrasahs, for example, will take note and heed of the changes also needed there. I hope that the MOE will also be able to provide help to ensure that the secondary madrasahs also measure up to the changing demands for secondary education for the future. I support the motion, Sir. 1.45 pm”
“This is something which Singapore has been consciously striving for through the Polytechnic and ITE education systems. I was among those who visited the MOE-arranged ITE visits and I am very impressed with the attention given and progress made in those areas. But further flexibility is required. We should be prepared to recognise talent from within these systems which are seen as secondary in stature to the contemporary secondary education-JC route, and hence be prepared to offer them and welcome them into further education in their later life. In this respect, I support the proposal to continue with the three-year Pre-University Centralised Institutes system and, if necessary, open another to provide more opportunities for those on the borderlines who might have the potential as late-bloomers. The proposal to allow some JC students to do their course in three years is also worthy of support. Our education system must be prepared to recognise that the future of national educational systems must take as their top priority the infusion into young minds the hunger for knowledge, the ability to learn and the freedom of expression. This hunger for knowledge and ability to learn should be given a longer leash, so to speak, by allowing students to choose at an early age areas of interest and to encourage their development. It is pointless to encourage creativity in general while keeping the options of student encased within what are deemed as 'guidelines for success'. It would be an even greater mistake to try to teach a person to be creative and expressive. It is something that has to be realised, or released . not taught.”
“Sir, not to be accused of failing to see the wood for the trees, my point in mentioning this anecdote is to emphasise that education is more than just a matter of passing the conventional subjects taught in class. Current affairs taught me the importance of knowing what is going on around us, and it gave me a good foundation for my journalistic career of more than 20 prime years of my life. I am glad that now "diversity and flexibility" is the "way forward". A broader and more flexible JC curriculum, with a focus on skills, more than content, giving students breadth and more flexible options, will certainly open new horizons for what education means. This has implications not only for JC and secondary education but also at the lower levels of primary and even pre-primary education. Parents not only need to be alerted but they must also be garnered to support the proposed changes. While communications skills will be given due and greater attention to the JC students, I hope and trust MOE will also polish its communications skills with parents to win over their support. Sir, the issue of competition in the system needs addressing. As criticisms seem rife as to the fact that the new system only encourages further elitism and an even greater struggle to get into the band of 'elite' students who will get to benefit from the more 'flexible' options in the system, I think we, as a nation, must be prepared to realise, welcome and cherish competition rather than shy away from it. Yet, it does not mean that students who do not fit into the top bandwidths will be forgotten. Flexibility should be tailored to ensure that students who do not excel in the normative system of education, be given a chance to excel in different fields.”
“In fact, the inherent spirit shown by MOE, indeed Singaporeans as a whole, to make refinements to an already successful system of education, will bode well for our future. I think the broader the education system, the more flexible our students will be and thus the easier they adapt to changing needs. We must move away from strait-jacketed systems that will hamper our movements. I realise that many of us, especially parents, are often hamstrung with outdated ideas about education and careers. Parents often think of their children in terms of being a doctor, lawyer or engineer. But the profile of the economy has changed so much that we have to change our mindsets and look at alternative routes. At the North East CDC, for example, we have chosen Creativity and Entrepreneurship as one of the key areas of our activities. The idea being, not just to create more entrepreneurs but more important, to instill a sense of enterprise in the hearts and minds of our citizens. Sir, when I was in secondary school, the mindset was to go for medicine. When I failed to get a place for Medicine in the Pre-University class, I remember my `mentor friend', a retired British Major, telling me, not to worry, I could be a good nurse. Little did I know that I would end up `nursing' the community. Community development and upliftment became my passion for life. This helped after I switched from the science stream to doing arts or humanities. I was also glad, Sir, that during my secondary education, the Principal of RI then, the late Mr E.W. Jesudason, introduced Current Affairs, as an examinable subject. I remember counting the number of coconut trees in the school compound and the question came out in the test paper. And I scored.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I rise in support of the motion. Sir, while in Delhi last week attending the Asian Network of Major Cities Meeting, I met the Governor of Tokyo, Mr Shintaro Ishihara, who is also a well-known writer and a critical thinker. He was awarded the prestigious Akutagawa Prize for the novel "Taiyo no Kisetsu" (or "The Season of the Sun"). He was indeed full of praise for our education system. He cited what he saw in how music was taught in our schools as an example of what he would like done in Tokyo. Similarly, he thought that it was strange that Singapore was already using the ERP technology, he said from Japan, but yet that system was not even introduced in his own country. This is the beauty of our system. It is a subject of praise in many countries, both in third and first worlds, but that did not stop us from improving and fine-tuning it. This is indeed the purpose of this exercise. The proposals put forth by the Junior College/Upper Secondary Education Review Committee, in the words of Minister RAdm Teo Chee Hean, will assure future cohorts of Singaporeans of a relevant and forward-looking education that is always in time for the future. I strongly agree. Senior Minister of State Tharman Shanmugaratnam and his able Committee deserve our encouragement and support for bravely venturing into those proposed changes, although there are those who feel that they could still be bolder. Mr Speaker Sir, the future challenges awaiting are innovation-driven and more globalised. Present standards of secondary and JC education will not be adequate. I share the confidence that the changes proposed will nurture the skills, spirit and values required for the more competitive world.”
“Nevertheless, like my friend, Mr Seng Han Thong, we all realise how difficult is the job done by the media people, day in day out, chasing deadlines and having to make decisions every moment of the day of their working day. Our hearts are with them and we hope they will continue to do the good work. The final point I would like to make, Mdm Deputy Speaker, is the test of this Bill or the Media Development Authority on the question of the choice of members which the Government or MITA will appoint to this Authority. I think the whole credibility of this Media Development Authority will depend on the kind of people that we elect to the Authority. I would like to ask the Minister to elaborate on what is the criterion for the selection of members of this Authority. I do hope that the Minister or the relevant authorities that will appoint the members will choose people who are critical-minded, open-minded Singaporeans, that will allow Singapore to move further ahead towards a mature media and a mature society. I support the Bill.”
“Mdm Deputy Speaker, thank you very much for allowing me to speak on this Bill. Mr Chiam here is a very good friend of mine. But I am amazed actually at the way he describes our media. I know we are all getting on in age, Mr Chiam included. Maybe we will soon be like grandfathers. But I cannot understand how he describes our media or Government's handling of the media is like a "nanny". Having been with the media business for more than 20 years as the editor of the Straits Times Group, I find that, in fact, the media has been maturing, and maturing very well indeed. I remember the early days when I was editor, I did feel that the media here was rather parochial and sensational and I did not want to have any part of it earlier on. But after having spent sometime, 3-5 years, I then realise how important the role of the media was and felt that in fact, it was important that we could be part of that development of the media. If you look at the media today, you will find that they are undergoing a maturing process, with the kind of different opinions and debates that are going on. I think it is helping us to move towards a maturing Singapore society. I see this move, Mdm Deputy Speaker, as an effort on the part of the Government to allow an authority and at arms-length to do the kind of work which the Ministry of Information, Communications and the Arts has been doing. To me, that is progress. When Mr Chiam and Mr Seng Han Thong talked about a "light touch", I wonder what do they mean by "light touch" as against a "heavy touch", I suppose. But I think here, perhaps what is needed is a judicious touch because "light touch" can also be too light and then we can also create problems for ourselves. But neither do I call for a "heavy touch" like in the early years.”
“Could the HDB also review its existing policies that might make it difficult for those needing to do so? This should also be part of the HDB's endeavours to remain nimble and flexible in helping those in need. Sir, I support the Bill.”
“Similarly, matters pertaining to leases, mortgages and the role of local banks are also very much in focus now. While I have no specific comments to make on those proposed amendments, except to call for a faster rate of lift upgrading, allow me, Mr Speaker, Sir, to urge the HDB to also look at the problem of those who want to downgrade. I realise that the HDB has been very understanding in facing the problems of those who need help in terms of rescheduling mortgages or in settlement of other financial dues. The recent economic downturn and its subsequent retrenchments and rising unemployment have made many, especially in the lower income brackets, to realistically review their aspirations and dreams about the level and quality of home-ownership. Many cases I met at the MPS, something I suspect must be true at other MPSs too, are seriously facing this problem of not being able to meet their obligations and do see downgrading as a way out. For those who had the hopes of making a profit from selling their flats have had to think again. Many, I suspect, are caught in this trap. They want to downgrade but there are not many three-room flats available as the HDB has stopped building new ones. Neither could they sell their present four or five-room flats without making a loss. Moreover, they would also need to put up cash upfront for their new purchases, something they would be hard put at. I do not know how serious this problem is but I fear it might be faced by many Singaporeans. Could the HDB, Sir, study this problem and see how best it could help the many home-owners who would like to or need to downgrade, but not capable of doing so either because of policy considerations or the market supply and demand situation?”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, we all know that HDB is one of the key household words in Singapore. There would not be the scale of home-ownership as we now know and have here without the concept and philosophy behind the setting up of HDB. It is an achievement which Singaporeans are all proud of. Successful as we are economically, the value of home-ownership, as a base for instilling a sense of belonging and as stakeholders in the newly emerging nation like our Singapore is priceless. One of the reasons why HDB has been able to deliver on that score is that it understood the need for the Board to remain relevant, nimble and flexible in fulfilling its role. HDB knows goalposts related to housing keep changing as Singapore and Singaporeans move up the ladder of economic and social well-being. For, after all, housing in Singapore is more than just a question of brick and mortar. It is indeed a socio-political phenomenon. It is about living and, more importantly, living under one multi-cultural roof. Judging from the number of amendments made by HDB since its inception, we are reassured that HDB wants to remain relevant, nimble and helpful. Whether for the better administration of the Act or to allow the Minister to make rules with respect to the terms and conditions of a sale, lease, mortgage or disposal of an HDB flat, or to allow an approved mortgage or statutory charge or to enable a poll to be conducted for lift upgrading and other special upgrading works, as the purpose behind this amendment Bill, to me, they all point to the intention of the HDB wanting to be helpful, and I support that. I agree that upgrading has been and is generally on the radar screen for sometime now.”
“Sir, I declare my interest as Mayor of North East CDC. Recently Radio 93.8 started a series of programmes where they interviewed Mayors and staff of the CDCs, to explain and to talk about the CDCs. To my surprise, most of those who were interviewed by Radio 93.8 claimed that they were not aware of what CDC was all about, and that they did not even know who their Mayors were, despite the fact that we have carried out quite a number of activities. Mrs Yu-Foo Yee Shoon said on the programme that South West CDC had 500 activities, and I am sure a lot other CDCs have equally impressive number of programmes to talk about. I wonder whether the PA and the Minister-in-charge would explain the thinking behind the CDC. I know the Prime Minister himself has been a champion of CDC and has made quite a number of speeches explaining CDC's role. But, CDC is an evolving entity. In fact, a number of the Mayors were doing part-time before, and only last term we have MPs serving as full-time Mayors. So in the nature of it evolving, from a role which I think the Prime Minister explained as "to play a bonding role to provide social cohesion", it has over the last six months spent a lot of time and energy on "jobs, jobs, jobs". So I think in the light of this evolving profile and nature of CDC, I hope the PA and the Minister-in-charge will explain the profile and the thinking behind the role of CDC.”
“A digital-lead empowered e-inclusive society will enjoy escalated value creation in the economy by increasing the productivity of our human capital. This ensures a better quality of life, something close to PA's heart.”
“Sir, I would like to touch on the question of digital divide which is highlighted under PA. I notice that PA has been alloted a budget to tackle this problem on digital divide. For Singapore to become a truly e-inclusive society, it is imperative that people who at present cannot use IT tools, such as Internets effectively, need to be facilitated and encouraged to adopt IT. For this to happen, focus needs to shift from just providing easy and cheap access to Internet to promoting relevant IT competencies and effective use of ICT among these digital have-nots, eg, senior citizens, disabled folks and people in the low-income group. These are people quite close to the ground where PA has direct access. Sir, relevant content and information knowledge need to be made available, and these skills will make our people more employable and encourage an independent way of life or lifestyle. To bridge the digital divide in Singapore, the following initiatives could go a long way: (1) Specific needs and problems of the digital have-nots in using ICT should be researched. Here, agencies like IDA can help PA in playing a key role. (2) Customise IT training tailored to the specific needs of these digital have-nots need to be made available at very low cost. Here, GROs and CDCs and organisations like the People Developer can take the lead. A focused campaign by PA on sensitising ICT player and how they can bridge the digital divide needs to be launched. (3) Web contents should also be made disabled and elderly-friendly. Here, SPRING can help PA. Finally, in today's knowledge-driven economy milieu, such steps will yield significant digital dividends.”
“MUIS needs to groom scholars who studied not just in Al Azhar (in Cairo) and Makkah/Medina (in Saudi Arabia) but also from new centres of Islamic learning in other more plural and open societies like Jordan, Morocco, or even in the US and Europe. Studies in Islamic tenets and jurisprudence are basic, but equally important are studies of contemporary Islamic societies and issues, including how they meet the challenges of social change, modernisation and living in this plural world. Sir, MUIS needs all the resources to tackle these challenges. It should also engage scholars and intellectuals from other parts of the Muslim world to work with our leaders to face these tasks. MUIS must also work closely with the community and religious leaders on issues affecting the community. 3.15 pm Now is not the time for the community to be passive and self-defeating. Neither should the community be finger-pointing all the time. The community does itself a disservice by being insular. It is time to look out and be bold about the fresh changes that are taking place in this new and different world. The community must feel and act as an integrated part of society in Singapore and the bigger world. Being a Muslim does not make me less a Singaporean, as anybody else in this House. The community has to stand up and stand tall in being counted as moderates who believe in tolerance, working together as a team, whether to fight terrorism or to build a better future for our children and grandchildren.”
“Sir, I wish there were more Members in the House because halal cuts can be just as sumptuous! Cut on MUIS, Sir. Why cut now? Sir, MUIS or the Islamic Religious Council's role in secular Singapore is unique. Singapore may be secular but even that brand of secularism is unique. I call it: secularism with a soul. The tudung issue notwithstanding, Singapore is not anti-religion. In fact, religion is allowed to play its role in forging a harmonious and cohesive society in our Singapore. After all, MUIS is a statutory board, appearing under the MCDS' care and budget. Back to the cut, yes, the budget cut, I was surprised to see a 4% dip in Government grants to MUIS. I do realise that MUIS has for some time now been receiving a larger income from its own zakat collection (tithes), but even that tap is facing a decrease, because of the economic downturn. I also realise that there are quarters, though a minority, who feel that MUIS should not bother about funds from the Government, for fear of being controlled, but I think that is being myopic and to the detriment of the community's interest. MUIS, identified by the PM as one of the key pillars for the Muslim community and which Minister Yaacob has also highlighted as a critical player to achieve his vision of the Community of Excellence, deserves all the help it can muster. This is especially true, post September 11. The tasks ahead for MUIS are even more formidable, both in forging a clear world view for the Malay/Muslim community and to help it uplift, in the light of the new and changing world, and also in promoting better understanding with other Singaporeans. MUIS needs new tools and added resources.”
“I know there are programmes being undertaken by the CDCs with some youth groups to carry out programmes to further entrench some of these youths who have come forward. Sir, I think I have answered most of the queries raised by Members.”