Zainul Abidin Rasheed
Singapore
“I think much has been done as far as recovery is concerned, and the Japanese government itself is now paying due attention to reconstruction. Just at the Jakarta meeting, in fact, there was a lot of sharing of what has been done, and while they are grateful, they also look forward to us working together in terms of the reconstruction.”
“Kelp that he had met Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew when Mr Lee visited Moscow in 1970. Even though then Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew at that time showed an interest to learn from the Soviet socialist system, he changed his mind after visiting the Soviet Union and made changes to the political system and the system of governance in Singapore…”
“In my opinion, the measures and programmes to achieve progress are quite visible and numerous. The Community Leaders’ Forum network continues to develop. What else should be given attention to, especially in relation to dysfunctional families and divorce cases?”
“I found the Malay workers in the Middle East very encouraging. This is one of the best opportunities for us in this new area. Finally, the three-prong Government measure is to ensure that every citizen will continue to contribute towards the development of Singapore to ensure that every Singaporean will be given the best opportunity to en…”
“Sir, I believe ASEAN's credibility does not just hinge on Myanmar. ASEAN's credibility has been built over the years and we have shown a lot of credibility in many areas in terms of international relations.”
“As the President has said, when we take advantage of the existing opportunities through globalisation, we must also pay attention to the fact that these new opportunities should not result in a wide income gap.”
The complete record
Every one of 455 lines we hold for Zainul Abidin Rasheed, in date order, each linked to its source. Free to read, in full, without an account. Page 4 of 10.
“Be it industrialisation, import substitution, export promotion, assembly of components, simple manufacturing, high technology, life sciences, financial services and developing Singapore as medical and educational hubs, we have been there. Why then now? In many eyes, this is a drastic change in position as far as casinos are concerned. Is the economy that bad? Are we throwing in the towels with competition through the tested ways? Are we lost on ideas to fight competition from China and India and other emerging economies? Or indeed, are the IRs our new additional tool to meet those challenges? I believe the latter is the reason why our Government has chosen to do so. We need all hands on deck and all tools possible to meet the new challenges of globalisation and the new wave of competition confronting us. It is a new world that demands a new and creative approach to meet them. Obviously, I am not saying, at all costs, especially the social costs, which many Singaporeans are justly concerned about. However, I trust most Singaporeans will be reassured by the approach taken by Government in tackling the issue. We have heard the assurance given by the Minister for Home Affairs, Mr Wong Kan Seng, who himself had shared with us his concerns and what measures his Ministry will embark upon to tackle the crime angle. The package announced by Minister Vivian Balakrishnan to work with FSCs and community organisations will also help. To those who believe that the Government should not throw the problem arising from gambling to the community, they should ask themselves whether in fact that is the right attitude. We face the challenges of making Singapore to continue to succeed and prosper together and we can and should handle the fallouts, if any, together too.”
“I think many of us also realise that, in fact, some of the best gamblers, if you like, those who patronise casinos all over the world, are Muslims. They may be good customers to the casinos but bad examples or models for the Muslim community. Sir, for sure, we Singaporeans have been proud of our safe, clean and green image. That is something worth fighting for to upkeep. The question now is whether we are going to soil our image and go amber with IRs, what with the casinos thrown in. Risks are there for sure, especially the understandable concerns regarding the increased social ills, or even increase in crimes related to gambling. Clearly, some Singaporeans who are sincerely opposed to having casinos in Singapore will be disappointed and they might even say that there is no point in discussing the issue anymore as it looks like 'head I win, tail you lose' for the Government. But to these fellow Singaporeans, Muslims and non-Muslims alike, I appeal to them to keep their minds open and see how the decision on IRs could be turned into a win-win situation for Singapore. Rest assured that judging from PM and Ministers' speeches and assurances, those concerns expressed have not completely fallen on deaf ears. Sir, undoubtedly, the decision to go IRs was not an easy one for Singapore. It took Singapore 40 years to do so. Surely, when we became independent, with so scarce natural resources, a casino would have been an easy choice. After all, Singapore was and is at the geographical crossroads of Asia. It would have been a convenient oasis for one. But no, Singapore, thanks to our pioneering leaders of independent Singapore, Mr Lee Kuan Yew and his strong views, in particular, avoided that option.”
“Let me quote the Secretary-General of the Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Mr Ng Yeow Song, who said that the Singapore Government was probably keeping up with the current trend to attract more tourists to the republic. He said, in fact, Johor could also benefit from it if Johor were to protect its environment, ie, it would raise the state's tourism potential. Also, the President of the Malaysian Chinese Tourism Association, Mr Chay Ng, felt that the impact of Singapore IRs on Malaysia would be insignificant. Instead, it would probably boost Malaysia's tourist industry. He said tour operators should view the matter with foresight and should not be close-minded. To quote him, "Tour operators, including the Tourism Ministry need not worry about the issue but should instead face it with an open mind." So I would also like to urge our Singaporeans to approach this issue of IRs with an open mind. But let me say at the outset that, as a Muslim, my position has to be no for religious considerations. But I am troubled in the sense that I live in an environment where it is a secular society, it is multi-racial and multi-religious. Can one community dictate the needs and decisions of the others, as Minister Yaacob Ibrahim has said on Monday? I think we have to be pragmatic, realistic and rational in our approach towards this issue. I am also troubled in the sense that when I look around the world, I do see quite a number of Muslim countries - Malaysia, Cairo, Morocco - have casinos. But, at the same time, I do not see them coming out of a situation, becoming so immoral as a society, so degrading as a society. They also use that as a tool to attract tourists to their countries.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, thank you for allowing me to join in this discussion. Sir, the MM has spoken, and with such force, and we all know it is not easy to disagree with the Minister Mentor. But I think MM will also be one person who will agree that concerns remain and it will be very difficult actually to convince those who disagree with the idea of having casinos or IRs. But this is not a small number, and we have to find a way to make sure that we will not end up dividing our Singapore society. When MM speaks, many listen, not only in Singapore, the region, but all over the world. And MM asked what signals are we sending to the world, to investors and non-investors alike. But I would also like to ask what signals do we understand from this discussion? Do we really understand the signals which I think the Government is sending to us Singaporeans about the change that has taken place, about the challenges, the elements of competition, with emerging China and India, and what other opportunities and options do we have to make Singapore to continue to succeed and prosper? I think our discussion is also drawing a lot of attention across the causeway in Malaysia. Many Malaysian media, newspapers, television stations, even leaders, have responded to this. Many are positive, some negative, some even cynical. And for those who are positive, they agree that the IRs will be good for tourism in the region. I was told that even the Chairman of the tourism board and the Secretary-General of the Tourism Ministry was quoted on CNA last night about growing the regional tourism pie, and I am sure this is in fact the reason the Singapore Government has opted for this approach to IRs, and this is in fact our hope too.”
“Sir, since the Mayor's name has been invoked, I would like to reassure Mdm Phua that, in fact, we treat all cases with urgency. For those cases which are very urgent, especially those that came from MPS cases, we give special attention to it, and we will reply to the MP concerned. For MPs who are still not happy with the rate of processing and rate of reply, they should bring this up directly to the Mayor concerned, and we would give due attention.”
“In FY 05, MFA intends to acquire three properties to house two embassies and one consulate. The sale of overseas properties is governed by guidelines issued by, of course, MOF to ensure that the disposals do not constitute a draw on past Government reserves. The purchase of overseas properties is also governed by guidelines issued by MOF to ensure that purchases are at fair market value. There are also procedures to ensure that leases are contracted at fair market rent. Finally, in the last five years, the total sale proceeds accruing from the sale of overseas properties was S$36.8 million, and it exceeded the total acquisition cost of S$12.5 million. As we all know, diplomacy and foreign relations are more than just a matter of good bargains, good opportunities for better relations all round is our mission.”
“As we begin to implement the reconstruction projects for Indonesia, Sri Lanka and Maldives, Singapore will continue to work closely with these countries. I am confident that, through this close interaction, we will strengthen our warm relations with these countries and foster new opportunities for cooperation. Sir, on the question of properties which we lease or buy overseas, we thank Prof. Ivan for that interest. We take various factors into account in our decision to lease or buy overseas properties. When good opportunities come by, we must be prepared to acquire such properties, particularly in countries where we have significant interests. For example, our Official Residence in London, which we at first rented from 1968, but was bought over recently at below valuation. Members may also like to know that this residence also happens to be the former residence of Earl Mountbatten. So it has also historical significance. Generally, our preference is to lease when we set up a new overseas mission as time is needed to assess our long-term requirements. However, when our long-term requirements have been established, our preference is to own them, where local conditions permit, because it gives us greater flexibility. MFA currently owns a total of 135 properties in 23 countries. But remember we have relations with more than 160 countries all over the world. In addition, it leases 117 properties in these countries. Our development cashflow is in the region of S$40 million per annum between FY 03 and FY 05 and comprises about 35% for purchases and 65% for development and upgrading of existing properties. Currently, 19 of our embassies and consulates are housed in owned properties while the remaining 18 are housed in leased premises.”
“The Americas are coalescing with NAFTA and the FTAA as the core while Europe is engaged in an unprecedented experiment of pooling sovereignties. East Asia is also moving towards regionalism, although in a looser and less institutionalised form, as patterns of trade, investment, production decisions and a web of FTAs slowly but, inevitably, bring the region together. The basic question we face is defining the nature of East Asian regionalism. We believe that it should be inclusive, forward-looking, adapting to and co-opting new developments in its midst, not least of which is India's rise. It is in Singapore's and ASEAN's interest to encourage deeper engagement of all the major powers. An outward-looking and open East Asian regionalism will help secure Singapore's economic as well as political future for the long-term. On the question raised by Dr Warren Lee on how we can take advantage of goodwill following tsunami and inter-regional cooperation, I think Members are aware of the reply I gave on 18th February in Parliament to MP Mdm Halimah Yacob's question on assistance to Aceh. Work is in progress. We have spoken about the relief efforts of the SAF and non-Government organisations, such as the Red Cross Society (SRCS) - apart from Indonesia, the SRCS has also sent relief missions to other tsunami-affected areas. As these countries begin to enter into a reconstruction phase, the Red Cross Society now leads a committee comprising representatives from various NGOs to ensure that the funds collected from the public are properly disbursed for the reconstruction projects. Among the planned projects are the rebuilding of schools, clinics and hospitals.”
“Our effective handling of the SARS crisis in year 2003 have been noted and praised by various WHO officials. Last year, MOH collaborated with the WHO to host an international seminar on the public management of communicable diseases. That Singapore was chosen as a partner and venue for the seminar speaks for itself. Sir, we, as an open economy, are heavily dependent on international trade. Singapore strongly supports an open rules-based multilateral trading system under the WTO. Our FTAs complement and strengthen the multilateral trade liberalisation process and do not contradict the WTO regime since they are WTO-consistent and WTO-plus. We see a dense network of intra-regional and cross-regional FTAs as facilitating free trade both at the regional and global levels. It provides better immediate market access and, we believe, improves the dynamics at the WTO towards concluding the Doha Round by injecting a greater sense of urgency into the negotiations. Our FTAs serve to expand our economic as well as political links. As a small country in Southeast Asia, our network of global FTAs helps put us on the world map. Our FTAs with the US, Japan, Korea, EFTA, Australia, NZ and Jordan are testimony to this fact. We want to ensure that Singapore is well plugged into the world of trade, finance, tax, transport and telecommunications. We will continue to forge these links, spanning the world. Our FTAs have created greater access to major and emerging markets for our companies. Companies anchored in Singapore can and should tap into this extensive network of global connections. This will reinforce our position as a strategic hub for business. One of the major trends of this century, I think, as we all know, is regionalism.”
“In fact, whenever I go round visiting other countries and meeting foreign dignitaries, one thing that clearly comes out in conversation is that they always ask about Prof. Tommy Koh, and they are reminded about his contributions at the UN and also at the Law of the Sea Conference, and many other officers like Kishore Mahbubani and Prof. Jayakumar. They all have made their mark when it comes to serving at International Organisations. I believe that these International Organisations view our role positively. We do what we can within our resource constraints. Our guiding principle continues to be to focus efforts in areas where we believe we can make a meaningful contribution. Our recent contribution to the tsunami-related humanitarian efforts is one good example. We were the first to arrive at the affected areas to provide immediate relief and to open up the transport routes before the bulk of international assistance arrived. We worked closely with the UN specialised agencies, and offered them the use of our air and naval bases as well as military assets on the ground. Various UN officials, including the Secretary General, Mr Kofi Annan, and the Under-Secretary General for Humanitarian Affairs, Jan Egeland, have expressed appreciation for our efforts. In fact, in a recent letter to the Prime Minister to thank Singapore for its contributions, the Secretary General wrote, and I quote: "Your Government responded ... magnificently, and provided the critical support required to sustain the United Nation's effort on the ground, particularly in terms of logistics, civil-military liaison and coordination." 1.45 pm Singapore's cooperation with the World Health Organisation is another example of our positive relations with key International Organisations.”
“Sir, first, allow me to thank the honourable Members for their interest in Singapore and MFA's work in the UN and International Organisations. Singapore continues to play a key role in International Organisations such as the UN. We believe that the UN is an important component of the international system, upholding the rule of international law and safeguarding the rights of small and large states alike. Singapore remains active in various international organisations and forums, such as in the UN, the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) and World Trade Organisation (WTO). In the case of ICAO, Singapore has been re-elected to the Council in 2004, and that is its highest decision making body. In telecommunications, the InfoComm Development Authority (IDA) represents Singapore at key meetings of the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), the principal international organi sation dealing with telecommunication issues. Singapore also chairs the UN working group that is working on a treaty to harmonise laws relating to contracts entered into by electronic means. Such a treaty will promote international trade by removing uncertainty on the legal aspects of matters such as Internet sales. On environmental issues, Singapore supports UN initiatives like the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, which we are party to since 1997. Although Singapore has yet to accede to the Kyoto Protocol, we are committed to becoming more carbon efficient. Mr Chay asked how the UN and other international organisations view Singapore's contribution in international affairs.”
“My hope is that the private sector will also tango with the Government in its efforts to seek and benefit from these new opportunities. Only then can we grow our economy and realise our aspirations for Singapore - a land of opportunity. In short, let this land of opportunity be our oasis for prosperity and harmony.”
“So after clawing out the baby camel meat and distributing it to each one of us on a plate, and we, as humble guests, reciprocated and showed our enjoyment, then with his hands full of oil, camel fat, he extended his hand to our SM. Perhaps, he saw the charm in SM's personality or, perhaps, he was also testing SM, in terms of how SM would respond to such a gesture. But SM Goh rose to the occasion, extended his hand and there you have a friendship for life established. So you can see Saudi Arabia is not only rich in oil, camel and camel fat, but also warm in friendship. Earlier, in fact, SM Goh was even invited by Crown Prince Abdullah - I think, here, Mr Speaker may want to note there is something in the name - to watch his annual camel race, which we were told was also a very rare hospitality and rare show of friendship which the Crown Prince extended to our Senior Minister. To me, that was a royal invitation indeed for Singapore to grow closer to Saudi Arabia and the Middle East too. To conclude, Sir, we indeed must revisit our relations with the outside world to look at opportunities we might have missed out when we plan strategies for the future. Whether the Middle East, East Europe or Central Asia, these are new frontiers that await our venture and exploration. We need to open up new opportunities outside to achieve our dream of becoming a land of opportunity in Singapore. Just as we have achieved better understanding among our diverse and plural society through dialogue and developing trust, we must also take advantage of the opportunities for dialogue with other countries and other regions. The Asia-Middle East Dialogue held in June in Singapore is a good example, like the one which Singapore initiated for Europe (ASEM) and with Latin American countries too.”
“I welcome the moves introduced by the Finance Minister to facilitate Islamic finance and I urge the private sector to seriously follow up to take advantage of the new facilities. The Government, I trust, would be following developments related to Islamic finance closely and will be equal to the needs to match the opportunities mushrooming. I would also like to see the Government, through its financial and investment arm, for example, the GIC, to set an example in showing confidence in Islamic finance as some of these instruments have also proven to be equal if not better than conventional banking ones. Like the hon. Mr Othman Haron Eusofe, I also hope that members of the Malay/Muslim business fraternity would take advantage of the new opportunities to help uplift their level of economic presence. Admittedly, they are small players and would not be able to match their competitors. But I hope they could use their advantage, in terms of religious and cultural affinity, to help the bigger boys to muscle in that new competitive market. In the Middle East, it is sometimes more than just a question of technical capability and financial capacity. It is also about establishing personal relationships and trust. Many of us would have that photograph of SM Goh extending his hands to a desert Bedouin etched in our minds. Let me share with you this anecdote. We were guests of the wealthy and flamboyant Prince Al-Waleed Talal at a desert dinner, resplendent with baby camel meat and countless number of dishes. I think we all know how the Bedouins eat. They are at their best with their hands.”
“Similarly, we must also ask ourselves which other country have we taken for granted. We need to revisit our old relationships and look at them anew and see what opportunities hold. I was told, in the case of Saudi Arabia, trade with China has grown from a mere US$300 million to US$10 billion over a short time of less than a decade. Did we miss out on those opportunities for Singapore, in many ways has been a gateway to East Asia? There are many ways Singapore can benefit from the growing opportunities in Saudi Arabia and the Middle East. Manpower development is a clear one. During my earlier trip to Bahrain and also Saudi Arabia recently, Singapore's expertise in manpower development was often quoted as exemplary. So is our town and urban planning experience, its clean and green image and, of course, discipline; chewing gum issue notwithstanding. These are areas where we can market our products and services for export. Our standing as a financial centre is impeccable. It is a draw for conventional banking. But that is now incomplete as a banking financial centre, as a growing number of Middle East countries and Muslims look for Islamic finance and banking opportunities. We need to develop new partners in search of maximising such opportunities. Whether dealing directly with Saudi Arabia or other Middle East countries, financial institutions and banks, or through Malaysia, or Bahrain, which have had a headstart in this field, fresh efforts must be taken or we would lose out on such opportunities too. The Government has shown interest and taken new initiatives as enablers but the private sector must quickly follow suit.”
“Only then can we create jobs, realise our dreams, and provide a better future for our children." While I still dream of the Arabian nights, let me draw some lessons from SM Goh's Saudi Arabia trip that I consider relevant to our goal of the blessed land of opportunity - our Singapore. Sir, Saudi Arabia is our largest trading partner in the Middle East. Although most of our trade is in oil imports, our exports being small, that relationship keeps our oil refineries and petrochemical industry going. Despite that, the last time a senior Minister visited Saudi Arabia was Mr Rajaratnam, and that was more than 20 years ago. Mr Goh's visit was indeed an eye-opener in many ways. For one, we cannot take such relationship for granted, not that we would lose the oil supplies, but we could lose out on many more opportunities. The world is changing post-cold war and, specifically in the case of Saudi Arabia and Middle East, post-911. Following the black tragedy of September 11 and the introduction of new security immigration measures in the US and Europe, Saudi Arabia and the Middle East are now giving more attention to East Asia. Whether in terms of capital flow, investments, education and tourism, Middle East is a new area of opportunity for Singapore. We might have our own perceptions of Saudi Arabia, its conservative traditions, women cannot drive, its lack of safety, in terms of the recent terrorist attacks, but it is not a country that we can afford to neglect anymore. I was told when we were there that there is a woman pilot, and they took pride in telling us that, in fact, the woman pilot came from Mecca, the cradle of Islam. And they also have an astronaut Prince who went along on the shuttle and to the outer space.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I just came back from the desert of Saudi Arabia. So please excuse my coarse voice. But I am nevertheless clear in my support for the motion. Sir, this Budget is a landmark budget, being the first by the Finance Minister who is also the Prime Minister. The Budget has wide-ranging effects on the country, its people and highlight the Government's principles of governance. But allow me to touch on our efforts to make Singapore a land of opportunity, in particular on opportunities overseas. Before that, Sir, it is important that we remember the point made by the Finance Minister and Prime Minister in his Budget Statement that while we promote an economy brimming with opportunity, we should also foster a strong sense of community among Singaporeans. I applaud this balanced approach to economic development and nation-building, for I am sure all will agree that an economic miracle without the social cohesion for our multi-racial and multi-religious Singapore is not sustainable. To use the desert jargon, our economic miracle is no mirage, the financial crisis of 1997 and the economic slowdown the last few years notwithstanding. We have shown what Singapore, its Government and its people, can do in bringing this tiny city state from the swamps of Jurong to the wafer fab plants of Pasir Ris, with the financial centre of Shenton Way thrown in and life science laboratories of Biopolis emerging in the wings. As PM Lee said in his Budget Speech, "The best way to make Singapore a land of opportunity is to grow our economy, to generate the resources to realise our aspirations. That requires us to continually adapt to the changing world, upgrading and restructuring ourselves in order to stay competitive.”
“Sir, we will convey the sentiment to the Singapore Red Cross Society. As Members know of our Singapore style, we are very transparent. So the Member can be rest assured that we will be able to give as much information as possible. POLICY ON SCHOOL DROP-OUTS 6. Mdm Halimah Yacob asked the Minister for Education (a) what is his Ministry's policy with regard to students who dropped out of school but subsequently wish to return; and (b) what programmes are in place to counsel, assist and encourage such students to return to school.”
“Sir, we have our own criteria of giving financial assistance. In fact, from past experiences, we have given something like US$50,000 or more to earthquake calamities and floods in China and Turkey. After giving the initial S$5 million for relief work, it dawned on all of us that the scale of the disaster caused by the tsunami was really unimaginable. If Members have been to Meulaboh and Banda Aceh, it is really unimaginable to think that waves could really cause that kind of devastation. We thought that it required more in terms of financial assistance. In fact, more than financial assistance, Singapore took the initiative to call for an international conference in Jakarta. So if we look at the total approach taken by Singapore, it is beyond the S$5 million, or beyond the US$10 million. In fact, it may reach something like S$150 million altogether put in by Singapore. As the whole episode unfolds, I am sure we will be incurring even more. We have to judge each calamity on its own merits, and I think the tsunami disaster deserves that kind of support.”
“On the question of disbursement, the Singapore Red Cross Society has set up a Committee (Tsunami Reconstruction Facilitation Committee) to support their work. I think the Committee has met four times since January and they have, in fact, received 14 proposals from seven VWOs and NGOs. They have given in-principle agreement to provide funding support to several projects. The Singapore Red Cross Society has issued a press release yesterday and we should see the details in the media soon. Some of the projects which have been approved include Habitat for Humanity for low-cost housing, the Singapore International Foundation's proposal for Sri Lanka to help restore the livelihood of fishermen, and support the rehabilitation of affected communities through the construction of communal facilities and provision of nutritional programmes. These are some examples to show that, in fact, work is in progress and there is movement. In fact, the Indonesian government only yesterday, if I am not mistaken, has given in-principle approval for the barge pier where they will form a joint committee and will work out the technical details. The Singapore Red Cross Society is appealing for VWOs and NGOs to come forward to put up their project proposals that require funding and other forms of support in the reconstruction phase. So it is still work in progress. Much has been done but much more, in fact, will be done in the few years ahead.”
“Under Article 6, the Minister for Foreign Affairs has the prerogative to extend certain privileges and immunities to certain persons as deemed appropriate though they are not covered under the provisions of the two Conventions. This provision will allow Singapore to accommodate the requirements of International Organisations for their staff to enjoy certain diplomatic privileges and immunities while in Singapore on temporary assignments. Sir, such a move will help promote Singapore as a diplomatic hub and, also, as an international arbitration centre. In addition, the Minister for Foreign Affairs also has the prerogative to withdraw certain diplomatic privileges and immunities from a foreign mission on the basis of reciprocity. The principle of reciprocity is enshrined in Article 47 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and Article 72 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, and is a universally recognised practice in international relations. Let me conclude, Sir, by saying that the passing of the Bill will put in place the necessary legislation for Singapore's accession to the two Conventions. Our accession will be one further demonstration of Singapore as a committed and responsible member of the international community. Sir, I beg to move. Question put, and agreed to. Bill accordingly read a Second time and committed to a Committee of the whole House. The House immediately resolved itself into a Committee on the Bill. - [Mr Zainul Abidin Rasheed]. Bill considered in Committee. [Mr Deputy Speaker in the Chair]”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I beg to move, "That the Bill be now read a Second time." Sir, this Bill seeks to enact the new Diplomatic and Consular Relations Act which gives force of law in Singapore to relevant provisions of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961 and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations 1963. This Bill will repeal the existing Consular Conventions Act (Cap. 52) and the Diplomatic Privileges (Commonwealth Countries and Republic of Ireland) Act (Cap. 83) whose provisions will be superseded by the new Diplomatic and Consular Relations Act. The Bill will also make related amendments to the Income Tax Act (Cap. 134) and the Merchant Shipping Act (Cap. 179). Sir, Singapore is currently not a signatory to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961 and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations 1963, although we follow closely the provisions of both Conventions in our dealings with foreign missions in Singapore and in managing our overseas missions in other countries. The two Conventions are universally recognised as customary international laws governing the protection and granting of privileges and immunities by the receiving State to diplomatic and consular missions and members of the missions so as to facilitate the smooth functioning of the foreign missions in the receiving State. To bring ourselves in line with international practices, Singapore has decided to accede to both the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, as well as the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, without any reservations. Sir, I would like to highlight two key features of the Bill.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, unlike Mr Low Thia Khiang, when it comes to safety and security, I feel that we should even be prepared to err on the conservative. I think we should put as much resources into making sure that our place and our citizens are safe. So while we pay tribute to our security agencies and personnel, I would like to even urge the Government to ensure that they are given the best of resources. It is also a question of spirit. I think we all know that it is also about the battle of the mind. So I am glad to see that the DPM and Coordinating Minister for Security and Defence has spoken about the need to build a better level of intellectual capital, for example, research into political Islam, violence and terrorism. I think we also need to ensure that we build up a greater sense of goodwill among our people. There is a lot of misunderstanding about Islam, Muslims, terrorism and violence. So I think better research into political Islam, violence and terrorism would also bring about better understanding so that we could get the majority of Muslims who are moderate to be on our side to fight the evils in terrorism and violence. And, finally, Sir, on the question about international and regional cooperation, I am glad to also hear the Coordinating Minister speak about threats in aviation and maritime. I would like to ask the DPM what is the level of cooperation that we are getting from our neighbours, particularly in the areas of maritime cooperation.”
“Sir, "hub" seems to be the buzzword nowadays, be it in education, transport, training and, of course, medicine. When we go hubbing - and here I do not mean looking for husbands - what is MOH's thinking on Singapore as a medical hub? What are the challenges? What about rising cost of living and medical care here compared to other cities in the region, eg, Bangkok? What is competition like from Bangkok? Is there a need to develop strategic alliances with countries in the region and the developed West to make this hubbing a success? What is MOH's strategy to make Singapore a medical hub? Is it in general or is it specific to certain areas, eg, cardiac centre, neuro centre, cancer treatment or as an eye centre? Do we have the hinterland necessary to make successful medical or niche hubs? On a related matter, Sir, what will MOH do to facilitate clearance of patients when it comes to movement of emergency cases? In times of enhanced security post-9-11 and stricter visa requirements, will this be a problem area? Will MOH push for easier clearance for medical visas, even promote medical tourism, eg, provide packages for foreigners to seek treatment here, but also package with other tourism requirements like hotel, shopping and recreation necessities?”
“Sir, since the Hon. Minister's lucky number 8 approach for his priorities, MOH has shown greater transparency and we welcome that. Cost is important. Yes, but quality of service is also critical. So my question is: how would MOH rate the present rate of quality of service? How is the service mentality at Government hospitals, compared with private hospitals, especially when we are keen to develop Singapore as a medical hub? SARS has shown Singapore's spirit of medical service. But how do you maintain that? Quality of service is different during crisis time compared to peace time or boom time when there is greater mobility. How do you maintain a service when we are short of medical manpower, including doctors and nurses? What has Singapore's experience been when it comes to enhancing quality of service, when we have to import nurses from all over Asia - China, Philippines and, I was told now, even Indonesia? In short, will MOH assure us that quality of service will remain credible while medical care cost remains affordable? Medical Hub”
“Sir, I agree with Minister Khaw Boon Wan that doctors are not god, neither bomohs, I suppose. But for those who think of MOH as our godfather, think again. I think we need to do a reality check on that. As for the Toyota system, I have been a Toyota consumer for some time now, not quite Lexus yet, but I am happy with Camry, so I hope the Minister would be kind when they do means testing for me. Sir, for a country like Singapore, where we have achieved varying top positions in many areas including airport and port, workers' productivity and risk factor, performance indicators are important. I would like to ask the Minister what are MOH's key performance indicators. What is the number of patients served? Quality of service? Is it cut waste? Cut cost? Or affordability? Is it the use of IT or application of technology? But what about relative to managing cost? Is it how we stretch the Medisave dollar, as the Minister was talking about just now or, perhaps, more importantly, how will MOH stretch Government's subsidy dollar for medical care? Mission of National Healthcare Group and SingHealth”
“Madam, our students overseas are facing many challenges. Perhaps, the challenges are even greater after September 11, especially when there is concern that they might come under the influence of negative elements while studying overseas, particularly in the Middle East. I am confident that our students will be fully responsible and will return to their family, society and country as they are fully aware of the important role that they will be undertaking later. We welcome our Minister's initiative in meeting the students during his visit to the Middle East recently. I hope the Minister could explain how MUIS is going to assist our students who intend to further their religious education overseas. Student Resource Development Secretariat”
“Madam, please allow me to speak in Bahasa Melayu. (In Malay): Islamic religious education, in particular madrasah education, has been in the spotlight since the tragic September 11 attacks. What was revealed in many madrasahs in Afghanistan during the Taliban period and later with the influence of Al-Qaeda elements, and also in some regions in Pakistan, has raised the concern of many quarters, including those in Malaysia and Indonesia. Has the Islamic religious education system in some madrasahs been tarnished by extremism, or even terrorism? Such concern has apparently spread to the entire world, such that Islamic religious education, especially that conducted in madrasahs, is often misinterpreted. I hope it will not lead to a situation where because of a few black sheep, the whole flock is affected. Madam, our religious education system and madrasah are clearly not as such. My question relating to Islamic education is: what is being taught through our Islamic education system here, be it through the madrasah or informal education? Islamic religious education has grown rapidly recently. I am sure it takes into account the needs of society in the context of a multi-racial Singapore. I hope the Minister could give us an update on the religious education plans of MUIS. Will it also emphasise that Islam is not a religion of terror? Besides teaching the fundamentals of Islam, does Islamic education also emphasise that it is a religion of grace for everyone, for Muslims as well as non-Muslims? Is the philosophy of Islam which underlines elements of tolerance, understanding and inclusivenessincluded? Will it also explain the true concept of Jihad and focus more on knowledge, education, and the well-being and prosperity of the nation? 5.00 pm”
“Sir, markets and hawker centres have a special place in the hearts of Singaporeans. The HDB and the Environment Ministry should ensure that there will be minimum possible headaches when it comes to market and hawker centre upgrading and development. The old marketplace and hawker centre at Bedok Reservoir Road would soon be redeveloped and, once ready, it will be converted into a kind of a harmony hub. The HDB has been very helpful, similarly the Aljunied Town Council and NEA. My question to the Minister is: what is the progress of the Hawker Centre Upgrading Programme in Singapore? I believe it makes sense for the Environment Ministry and NEA to take over the management of hawker centres and wet markets. Are there plans to place them under one agency? Wet Markets/Hawker Centres”
“These private industries are eagerly waiting for PUB to supply NEWater to Jurong Island so as to provide cost-competitiveness and avoid a situation where the industries have no choice but to buy high-grade water from only one privatised source. Can the Ministry clarify whether PUB will supply NEWater to Jurong Island so as to ensure that Singapore remains cost-competitive and to ensure that there is no privatised monopoly for such NEWater of high-grade quality? Water Conservation and Supply”
“Sir, we agree with Minister Lim Swee Say that when it comes to our “OK” environment, we are all in it together. We will drink to that, and for that, we need more water. Singapore has already announced its new strategies of four taps, including NEWater and desalination, adding a new sense of confidence and fluidity. Although there seems to be a new wind of friendship blowing across the Causeway, after Datuk Abdullah Badawi took over as Malaysia’s Prime Minister, we have only seven years before the first Water Agreement in Malaysia expires in 2011. While we hope for the best, we must prepare for the worst. Are plans on track to make up for it if no solution to the Gordian Knot was forthcoming? Sir, what are the chances of resolving the Malaysian Water Agreement? Is the installation of our water supply system under a Water Agreement with Indonesia still on the cards? Even with NEWater and desalination, do we still need to increase the storage capacity of reservoirs within Singapore for strategic reasons? Should the use of underground space for storing water be pursued? What would ENV do to ensure that the waterworks will be kept in good working order to achieve the lowest costs, and thus keeping it competitive? Will NEWater and desalination drive up the cost of PUB water supplied to industries, commercial sectors and households? Finally, Sir, many industries located on Jurong Island require high-grade water and at the moment, I was told that there is only one private supplier of such high-grade water in Jurong Island. This results in a privatised monopoly.”
“Madam, I have lived before in an HDB flat for about 15 years, and I find it is not bad actually, with very little complaints. I enjoyed living in HDB flat. And now that I am an MP, I do receive quite a lot of complaints like quality, design and structure. But each time we have complaints, we will refer them to HDB or the town council. We do get quite good response. But I would like to raise two points. One is the question of spalling, ceiling leaks and many other complaints, and whether they have to do with aging of the HDB estates. About 85% of flats are 10-year old, and maybe half of that are 15 or 20 years old. I shudder to think what will happen in the next 10 or 20 years as most of the flats are on 99-year leasehold. I wonder whether HDB would like to look at this policy, in terms of ownership and leasehold. The other is the question of governance. What kind of governance do we want? We are told, in fact, that once you get a flat, HDB is liable for about one year for repairs and other complaints. But, on the other hand, when we have this ceiling leak problem, I am not sure about spalling concrete, we were given a kind of goodwill, sharing of cost at 50-50 responsibility. So residents have come to expect that, in fact, HDB is actually partly responsible. And now when it comes to windows falling, they also expect that, and we cannot say that since they have already got 10 years, it is their responsibility. So I think the question is: what kind of governance do we want? How do we educate the HDB dwellers about their responsibility? As this is public housing, they think HDB must be responsible. But, on the other hand, they must equally be responsible and be made aware of the question of shared responsibility.”
“Sir, I share the same concern raised by hon. Members Mdm Cynthia Phua and Mr Andy Gan and that is the question of whether there are enough rental flats available. I will not repeat those issues. But I just wish to add that I notice a new trend, that is, there are quite a number of senior citizens having bought a flat, maybe even upgraded, and then find that they now no longer need those flats or the flats are too big because their children have grown up, got married and moved on. For such people who would like to now go for rental flats, which they feel is a wiser thing to do, would the policy allow that? What are the encumbrances and are there enough flats available for rental?”
“Sir, allow me to congratulate the HDB for being flexible in rescheduling payments when residents appeal. Does HDB see this as a transient or a major exercise with long-term consequences? What has HDB's feedback been on the need to be even more flexible when faced with Singaporeans who are out of jobs? What are the kinds of flexibility asked for by Singaporeans other than downgrading and rescheduling of payments? What kind of flexibility was exercised by HDB? Will HDB allow those who have successfully obtained permission to downgrade to be allowed to obtain 3-room rental flats? My experience shows that while HDB allows downgrading, the same residents will be told that they will not be allowed to rent or purchase a flat for the next 30 months. Sir, in the light of these changing circumstances, would HDB relook at the older policies which were introduced during boom times, to prevent too much speculation and Singaporeans having too many bites of the public subsidy? Gone are the days when Singaporeans would buy for speculative reasons, hoping to reap huge margins to pocket profits when they resell their flats. Nowadays, many are caught in the changed market when they are strapped for cash and cannot manage their mortgage when out of job or suffering from chronic illnesses. Home Ownership”
“On a final note, Sir, while it is certainly helpful to boost the Singapore spirit with talk of the land of opportunity, the Government will need to do more to convince Singaporeans that we are still indeed a land of plenty, especially for those who are still out of job and struggling to find alternatives that would keep themselves and their families afloat. We note that while 12,000 jobs were created in the second half of 2003, 30,000 jobs were lost in the first half. The deficit has had a dent on that Singapore spirit. I would like to call on the Government to work even closer with the people to strengthen that Singapore spirit. That is also a fundamental. It is more than just a question of nuts and bolts and policies. It is also about mending mindsets. Sir, I support the financial policy of the Government.”
“Feedback I get from the ground is that they are very reassured that the Government and DPM Lee care about keeping healthcare cost affordable. They cited the escalating cost of medical care, like the example DPM mentioned about angioplasty with stents, as cause for concern, with cost rising very fast, and, worse too, if there were complications. We are told that only 5% of cases end up with complications but, knowing how kiasu Singaporeans can be, many would feel it is better to be cautious than to risk high charges. Means testing sounds equitable but, being new, I am glad to see the Government agreeing to "proceed cautiously". MOH needs to work out a system that is sustainable and this will be possible with time and experience. The Government must ensure that this means testing will not end up being seen as "mean". Flexibility must be its test, as services cover a wide range of inpatient care to surgery to specialist outpatient. There is also the need to differentiate from the ordinary observation ward to the ICU, with or without complication, no matter how low the chances of complications surface. The heart-wrenching case of filial children wanting to show gratitude to their father and placing him for observation in class A, ending up with complications and weeks in ICU and a $170,000 bill a year back, would be a case worth looking at. Indeed, for fear of such a situation or complications, there would be many Singaporeans who would prefer to be prudent in going for lower class treatment and not because they want to abuse the subsidy system.”
“But, mind you, people used to stare at my wife and myself when we walked with our four kids. Perhaps, they see us as anti-socials! Now, they say we have foresight! But I must say that it was not easy to have three or more kids, especially for the wife. It is easy to talk about shared responsibilities in bringing up families, but reality is different. Of course, we must do more to bring about this sense of shared responsibilities, as this will also be an important factor whether we succeed in promoting bigger family size. And it is more than just a question of affordability. It is also about quality of life, the pressures and demands on our time, and whether we could provide the kind of time necessary to ensure quality time for the family. Like other Members of the House, I also empathise with Mr Lim's unenviable task, but I am sure Minister Lim will not leave any stone unturned to ensure that this fundamental about procreation and a better replacement rate is a success. On a different note, Sir, while we want to generally promote more babies, we must also be careful not to send the wrong signal to those whom we feel would best provide a fighting chance for their families to make good, if they keep their families small. For those who are already struggling to make ends meet, for the sake of the future of their children and themselves, there is HOPE which we are trying to promote, and where an important consideration is still to stop at two. Perhaps the Government could also review this policy and consider whether those with three children could also benefit from the scheme, thus - excuse the expression - killing two birds with one stone through HOPE Plus. Similarly, Sir, an area of concern hanging like dark clouds on Singaporean minds is the question of healthcare cost.”
“While DPM's assurances that no one needs to miss a tertiary education because of financial reasons are well-received, in reality, the number of bursaries and scholarships is limited. Loans are also tight and, when made available, often hang like a psychological burden on the heads of the fresh undergraduates and their families. I would not be surprised if that also contributes to the larger concern to delay having their babies, let alone to have more bundles of joy when discharging loans still unpaid. If fees need to go up, requiring more to resort to loans, perhaps the Government could also consider allowing an incentive scheme where those graduates with such loans who marry early and have children would benefit from the baby bonus schemes, eg, a rebate on their outstanding loans. But dollars and cents aside, I agree with the hon. Member Mr David Lim that it is very much a question of emotions. The passion for having more children must be there before any policy to promote a more productive TFR rate could succeed. Mayor Othman was right that the Mayors generally have set a good example on this score. Mayor Heng is still young, and there is still hope. As the Government needs to set a good example on policy implementation, I suppose it is also right to hope that the younger married MPs should also set the example. I do not know about Mr Lim Hng Kiang, but younger Ministers, too, of course! When I was Editor of Berita Harian, I used to write editorials to persuade my readers to stop at two, as the situation then warranted such a policy. Personally, however, I felt that I could afford and should have more. I am now blessed with four lovely children. In fact, I used to encourage my Malay and non-Malay professional friends to have at least four children.”
“But, Sir, one thing we do not want to leave to luck is manpower planning, as our human capital is one key resource we have to do our best to develop. Thus, I see the Government's intentions to raise university fees with some concern. So do I worry about healthcare affordability in our efforts to build a strong society, what more a greying one. I agree that a strong society is marked by a high degree of self-reliance, resilience and social responsibility. This, I call the Singapore Spirit. I also agree with DPM that "the migrants from China, India and the Malay archipelago who built modern Singapore relied on themselves, their families, and their communities to make a living against great odds". This, indeed, will have to continue to be the trump call, even more so for those lagging behind, as the world gets more competitive. Local communities and the people sector indeed had launched a variety of self-help initiatives and played an important role in society. DPM's call for more of such initiatives, I am sure, will be heeded, including by the CDCs and the public sector. Having said that, I appeal to the Government not to rush into asking undergraduates to pay a bigger share of the cost of university education. It is already high. Tertiary education is no longer the enclave of the privileged. In my days, an exclusive 5% benefits from university education. Now, it is more than 25%. Is it really true to say that the benefits of a university education accrue mostly to the individual? Not only do they end up contributing more to the country's coffers, more often than not they help to bring up their immediate families' economic well-being, thus helping the economy too.”
“Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I rise in support of the motion in the name of DPM and Finance Minister. We have just heard the voice of business earlier from hon. Member, Mrs Fang Ai Lian. Allow me to talk a little about strong society from the socio-economic point of view. To me, Sir, this is the right Budget for the right time. To agree with that statement, one needs to see the Budget in the context of what has been offered and achieved by way of the few previous budgets, particularly since the financial crisis of the late 90s. For those who look at the Budget in anticipation of more personal goodies, I agree with some of the feedback I have heard from my grassroots that it did not provide much excitement. For me, DPM's reminder and call for Singaporeans to reaffirm our fundamental for Singapore's survival and success and to make Singapore a Land of Opportunity are indeed exciting. I hope DPM's and the Government's thinking on such guiding principles will continue to fire the imagination of today's Singaporeans and that of succeeding generations, to carry on and to keep that torch burning. Sir, after two decades of fast-track growth, the last six years after the 1997 financial crisis have been rather humbling. It is like the lyrics of the Hokkien song "ai piah zia ay yiah: wusi ki, wusi lo". For those who do not understand Hokkien, it means, "It can go up, it can also come down." The residents in my constituency, however, get even more excited when the words are sung as "wusi ki, buay sai lok", ie, can go up but cannot go down, although reality tells us that the former is normally true. I am glad, however, that the song believes that it is 70% hard work that matters, and that it is only 30% "sa hun ti chu tia", meaning luck or fate.”
“In the longer term, it would be viable only if Muslims are included in HOTA, not as a special or exclusive component, but indeed inclusive. Muslims cannot expect to have the cake and eat it. The disadvantages of being out of the system are real and the Malay-Muslims as a community cannot afford to let this continue. The health and financial considerations are indeed very serious. I am nevertheless glad to see MOH agreeing to continue to work with NKF and MKAC to get more Muslims to pledge, with the waris agreeing, at the outset. Public education, Sir, must continue.”
“Such matters should be best left to them to decide. The Mufti and his Fatwa Committee in fact have been progressive in making rulings that meet the challenges of contemporary demands. While starting with a "No", following further investigations and enlightened interpretations of the Quran, the Fatwa had allowed organ donation and transplant. From kidney, the ruling now allows other organs too, like heart and liver. Even cornea, which was at first not allowed, is now possible. It is also positive in terms of stem cell research. I would like to urge MUIS and its Fatwa Committee to continue to be proactive and progressive in their search to make Islamic law more inclusive in times of need, whether in principle or in terms of emergency needs. The condition set for waris and next-of-kin to approve, while understandable in promoting a collective sense of family responsibility and to avoid potential abuses of individual consent, should also be reviewed in the context of this urgent and pressing need to save lives. The Fatwa Committee might want to review whether it is possible to waive the need for waris in the context of emergency (darurah). If the concept of 'darurah' was invoked for the principle of organ donation, perhaps it could also be done for the process, ie, the opt-out system. It is after all a process. MUIS and the Fatwa Committee should consider that. While waiting for that, for those who are waris or potential waris and have reservations countersigning the pledge by their next-of-kin or siblings, please think of the donors' wishes. The Fatwa Committee should encourage all waris to respect the donors' wishes. This, however, I see it as only an interim position.”
“While in the earlier decade, only about 42,000 people or less than 2% of the non-Muslim population pledged under MTERA, about 14,000 people among Muslims or 5% have pledged their kidneys. The Muslim effort was credible - names like Mr Ameerali Tyeabali and Mr Bokhari Razak, among others, are worth applauding - but it was never going to be enough. I had my doubts from the very beginning about the opt-in system. I remember asking Mr T T Durai of the Singapore Kidney Foundation, why not push for HOTA for the Muslims, years back, but he cautioned that it took Singapore 15 years to bring the Singapore population around to HOTA and that we should not rush the Muslims as it might backfire. I knew that human inertia being such and added to that, earlier misplaced religious/cultural misgivings and human comfort level being what they were, and indeed still true to some extent till today, an opt-in system would not deliver the results necessary. Later, after another 15 years, Mr Durai himself was desperately pushing for more Muslim pledges, if not to include them under HOTA, realising how critical the situation was. It is no longer just a question of opt-in or opt-out but serious financial and health burdens inflicted on many more Malays, as about 20% of those affected by kidney failures are Malays, compared to the population ratio of 14%. Moreover, if we want to achieve a better rate of compatibility in transplants, more Malays need to agree to pledge their organs. Just to clarify, Sir, what Mr Chiam mentioned yesterday, organ tranplant and donation should no longer be an issue for Muslims. The Fatwa allows organ transplant and donation. This is also true for many other Muslim countries, including Saudi Arabia, Indonesia and Malaysia. I am not a religious scholar.”
“I would therefore like to commend MOH for a careful approach in this matter. The Minister's assurance that efforts at educating the public will continue is worthy of note. Despite more than 30 years of tackling this problem, there are still serious doubts about HOTA and now its extension, in many quarters, including from religious circles and individuals who are still not convinced of the need. Yes, the majority of Singaporeans do agree, but there are still others who are troubled by it. It is good that the Act allows Singaporeans who have doubts about the system to opt out. Some 12,000 non-Muslims have done so, and this freedom to choose should continue. The educational process must also continue and I think it can and should also start as early as possible in the schools, for example. I share the concerns raised by some of my fellow Parliamentarians, including those surrounding the definition of "brain death", professional as well as ethical considerations, and they need to be addressed. They must not be taken for granted and brushed aside easily. So are the personal, cultural and religious misgivings, but they need to be handled sensitively. One cannot under-estimate the risk of such issues being mishandled, including inadequate safeguards or the safeguards being abused. Let us ensure that there are sufficient ethical and professional safeguards to avoid the possible abuses, including sales of organs and/or wrongful removal of organs, as also cautioned by Dr Tan Cheng Bock yesterday. Allow me now, Sir, to turn to the question of Muslims and HOTA. I know that the Singapore Kidney Foundation, MUIS and the Muslim Kidney Action Committee have been working very hard to get more Muslims to pledge under MTERA.”
“This is especially true for Malay/Muslims, majority of whom are now not covered under the HOTA, as some true pledgings are covered under the 1972 Medical (Therapy, Education and Research) Act. It is sad to see the faces of many residents who suffer from those ailments, and their families, who seek help at our MPS sessions, CDCs, and also at the Ramadan Tabung Amal charity. When the North East CDC held its Talk Shop series on 26th January last year to discuss the proposed amendments, we featured four special guests connected with organ transplants. One was a heart transplant recipient, the first Malay to do so; another a Chinese gentleman who had to wait eight years for a kidney transplant; a couple who became a living-related donor and recipient, and a mother of an eight-year old boy who died of a platelet disorder (bleeding in the brain) and she decided at his deathbed to donate her only child's organs for transplant. And there, three persons benefited from this benevolent act of hers. Her boy's kidneys saved a 12-year old girl and a 17-year old boy; his liver saved a 14-year old girl, and his corneas gave sight to a 54-year old woman. All heart-wrenching stories to share, and the latter heart-warming too. However, for our first world Singapore, one that is well-known for being very professional and organised in managing its problems, this was not just a matter of clinical tackling of the situation. The Government realises the sensitivities involved and has taken a step by step approach to handling the question of organ transplant, from the Medical (Therapy, Education and Research) Act (MTERA) of 1972 to HOTA in 1987, and now, further amendments only after another decade and a half. I welcome this approach.”
“Mr Speaker, Sir, thank you for allowing me to join in the debate on the Human Organ Transplant (Amendment) Bill. Sir, yesterday, Mr Ahmad Khalis, cited an anonymous quote, asking "Is life worth living?" and answering it aptly by saying: "It depends on the liver". I know that Ahmad Khalis is no drinker. So, I suppose he means both the person and the organ. Well, take heart too, Sir, and mind you, we will have to do it with our eyes open. Yes, Sir, make no bones about it, I do support the amendment Bill. Sir, the Acting Minister has made his case very clear and we do need to amend the HOTA to extend it beyond "accident deaths" to include all brain deaths; beyond kidneys, to include liver, heart and cornea, and beyond "cadaveric organ donation" to also regulate living donor transplants. We know Singapore is not alone in this. There are at least 21 countries in the world with presumed consent for organ donation. Of these, only two countries, Spain and Turkey, limit their legislation to deaths caused by accidents. None of these countries restrict the organs covered by their legislation to just kidneys. We also know that the demand for organs for transplants exceeds supply. As of June 2003, there were 654 patients on the kidney transplant, 26 on liver and 5 on heart transplant waiting lists here. I believe the Minister may have a more updated position. For the kidney transplant waiting list, this is an increase of 15% over 1998. As a result, the average waiting time for a kidney has increased from five years to eight years. Sir, this is obviously not just about statistics. This means even more hardship.”
“This is a judgment, I think, that is best made by the medical professionals on the spot, given the particular case at hand and medical and evacuation facilities that are available.”
“The question that I would like to ask, Sir, is very specific. On the question of the time lapse which the Minister explained just now, between 1645 hours when SG Hu collapsed and the time he reached SGH at 1752 hours, I wonder whether anything could be done to improve on it, for example, Changi Hospital could have been used instead of SGH for the purpose. And what about the medical facilities at Pulau Tekong itself? Could they be improved? RAdm Teo Chee Hean: Sir, the timeframe for evacuation in the case of SG Hu was within the norms which have been designed and found to be suitable by the medical professionals in the SAF. A helicopter was used to evacuate SG Hu from Pulau Tekong to Singapore General Hospital. You can imagine the response time was quite fast - to be able to get a helicopter to Pulau Tekong and from Pulau Tekong to Singapore General Hospital. There are a number of phases in the medical treatment of SG Hu. The first phase was by the medic on the spot at the site. Then, he was evacuated to Pulau Tekong Medical Centre where he was again given medical treatment. Along the way to Pulau Tekong Medical Centre, he was continually treated and also during the evacuation from Pulau Tekong Medical Centre to Singapore General Hospital. Sir, one must not look just at the timing but also the circumstances of any particular case. Because there will be occasions when the casualty may not be able to be moved for medical reasons and may have to be stabilised on the spot first before being moved, say, from the location where the incident occurred to the next echelon of medical facility, and then again he may have to undergo further stabilisation there before being transported again.”
“Thank you, Mr Speaker, Sir. I have one question. But before that, if you allow me, Sir, to say this. As a father of three sons who had done National Service, and I am sure practically every household has a son who is doing National Service, it must have been quite frightening to learn that such unauthorised training practices have taken place. Parents, therefore, would expect higher discipline and adherence to authorised training. I would like to see MINDEF reassuring the public on that score. On that note, Sir, I am personally reassured to hear that MINDEF take the gravest view of the matter.”
“I have heard some of the concerns of the middle income squeeze too. In fact, many of them feel that they are the ones who will suffer most, and without much help from the existing programmes mostly catered for the needy, which the middle income would not qualify. Mr Speaker, Sir, I support the proposed changes in the CPF but would like to urge the Government and all its implementing agencies to watch the follow-through developments closely and to give feedback that would help fine-tune the system further, if necessary. I realise that the Government has said repeatedly that most, if not all, of the cost-cutting measures have been taken, including reducing other cost factors such as land price, taxes and other measures, to help alleviate the interim pains felt by many, but the Government should go through with a thin comb the cost of Government and trim whatever else necessary. MOH's recent announcement to do so is a good example. This will reassure many Singaporeans that Government is not too cost-cutting happy elsewhere but indeed ready to work hand in hand with the people to overcome these challenges together. EXEMPTED BUSINESS (Motion) Resolved, That the proceedings on the business set down on the Order Paper for today be exempted at this day's sitting from the provisions of Standing Order No. 1. - [Mr Mah Bow Tan]. RETUNING THE CPF Debate resumed.”